Effect of preinfarction angina pectoris on outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty (results from the Myocardial Infarction Registry

Preinfarction angina is associated with better clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who receive intravenous thrombolysis. This has not been proved in patients with AMI treated with primary angioplasty. We analyzed the data of the prospective multicenter Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR). Of 14,440 patients with AMI, 774 with a prehospital delay of < or =12 hours were treated with primary angioplasty. Five hundred thirty-two patients (68.7%) had preinfarction angina. Patients with preinfarction angina were slightly older than patients without (63 vs 62 years, p = 0.042), prehospital delay was 1 hour longer (180 vs 120 minutes, p = 0.001), and arterial hypertension was more prevalent (47.6% vs 32.2%, odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.39 to 2.62). There was no significant difference in hospital mortality (5.6% vs 3.3%, OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.79 to 3.87), reinfarction, stroke, or the combined end point of death, reinfarction, or stroke between the 2 groups. Logistic regression analysis showed no association of preinfarction angina with the occurrence of either death (OR 2.21, 95% CI 0.91 to 6.08) or the combined end points (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.31). There was also no significant difference in mortality (6% vs 5.1%, OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.52), reinfarction, stroke, postinfarction angina, or the combined end points between patients with preinfarction angina within 48 hours compared with patients with preinfarction angina between 49 hours and 4 weeks before the AMI. Thus, the MIR data showed no protective effects of preinfarction angina in patients with AMI treated with primary angioplasty.     

Improving care for patients with acute coronary syndromes: initial results from the National Audit of Myocardial Infarction Project (MINAP)

Objective: To describe the improvements in care that have followed the introduction of an electronic data entry and analysis system providing contemporary feedback on the management of acute coronary syndromes in 230 hospitals in England and Wales.     

Characteristics of black patients admitted to coronary care units in metropolitan Seattle: results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry (MITI)

Since 1988, 641 black and 11,892 white patients with chest pain of presumed cardiac origin have been admitted to coronary care units in 19 hospitals in metropolitan Seattle. Black men and women were younger (58 vs 66, p less than 0.0001), more often admitted to central city hospitals (p less than 0.0001), and developed evidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) less often (19 vs 23%, p = 0.01). In the subset of 2,870 AMI patients, blacks (n = 121) were younger (59 vs 67, p less than 0.0001) and had less prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (2 vs 10%, p = 0.005) and more prior hypertension (67 vs 46%, p less than 0.0001). During hospitalization, whites (n = 2,749) had higher rates of coronary angioplasty (18 vs 10%, p = 0.03) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (10 vs 4%, p = 0.04), although thrombolytic therapy and cardiac catheterization were used equally in the 2 groups. Hospital mortality was 7.4% for black and 13.1% for white patients (p = 0.07). However, after adjustment for key demographic and clinical variables by logistic regression, this difference was not as apparent (p = 0.38). Questions about the premature onset of coronary artery disease, excess systemic hypertension, and the differential use of interventions in black persons have been raised by other investigators. Despite differences in age, referral patterns and the use of coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery, black and white patients with AMI in metropolitan Seattle had similar outcomes.     

Association of pre-percutaneous coronary flow grade and clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Data from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry

Because of a paucity of published data, we compared the 2-year major clinical outcomes between pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (pre-PCI) thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0/1 (pre-TIMI flow grade [pre-TIMI] 0/1) group and pre-PCI TIMI flow grade 2/3 (pre-TIMI 2/3) group in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who underwent successful implantation of newer-generation drug-eluting stent.A total of 7506 NSTEMI patients were divided into 2 groups: pre-TIMI 0/1 group (n = 3157) and pre-TIMI 2/3 group (n = 4349). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or any repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was stent thrombosis (ST).After propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis, 2 PSM groups (2473 pairs, n = 4946, C-statistic = 0.684) were generated. Major adverse cardiac events (hazard ration [HR], 1.294; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.065–1.572; P = .009), all-cause death (HR, 1.559, P = .003), cardiac death (HR: 1.641, P = .005), and all-cause death or MI (HR: 1.531, P = .001) rates were significantly higher in the pre-TIMI 0/1 group than in the pre-TIMI 2/3 group. Moreover, these differences were more prominent during the first 1 month after the index PCI. However, the cumulative incidences of recurrent myocardial infarction, any revascularization, and ST were similar between the 2 groups.Among a contemporary cohort of NSTEMI, these data suggest that the presence of a pre-PCI patency of the infarct-related artery showed better mortality reduction capacity than those with a lack of patency.     

Appropriateness of gastrointestinal prophylaxis use during hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Analysis from the China Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry

BackgroundThe current status of gastrointestinal prophylaxis (GIP) usage and its effects on hospitalized acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is not clear. We investigate the appropriateness of GIP usage and its relationship with clinical events in China.HypothesisAppropriate use of GIP is not associated with increased adverse outcomes.MethodsFrom January 2013 to September 2014, a total of 24 001 consecutive patients from 108 hospitals with AMI in China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) registry were analyzed. The appropriateness of GIP was evaluated using the current American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association (ACCF/AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. The primary endpoint was in‐hospital gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), while the secondary endpoints were in‐hospital and 2‐year follow‐up net adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (NACCE). Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the effect of appropriate GIP.ResultsThere were 16 413 (68.38%) AMI patients co‐medicated with GIP. Among 108 involved hospitals, only 35 (32.4%) hospitals prescribed more than 50% appropriate GIP. Totally, 59.7% (14 340) AMI patients received inappropriate GIP. Inappropriate GIP use was independently associated with use of GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Moreover, appropriate GIP use was associated with decreased GIB risk (OR: 0.692, 95% CI: 0.507‐0.944, P = .0202) during hospitalization, while not with increased in‐hospital and 2‐year follow‐up NACCE.ConclusionThe use of GIP is prevalent in patients with AMI in China but only 40% of hospitalized patients received appropriate GIP. Appropriate prophylactic therapy was associated with decreased GIB risk during hospitalization.     

Seasonal Pattern of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the rate of hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) varies seasonally in a large, prospective U.S. registry.

Background. Identification of specific patterns in the timing of the onset of AMI is of importance because it implies that there are triggers external to the atherosclerotic plaque. Using death certificate data, most investigators have noted a seasonal pattern to the death rate from AMI. However, it is unclear whether this observation is due to variation in the prevalence of AMI or to other factors that may alter the likelihood of a fatal outcome.

Methods. We examined the seasonal mean number of cases of AMI (adjusted for the length of days in each season) that were submitted to the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) by 138 high volume core hospitals over a 3-year period (December 21, 1990 through December 20, 1993) during which the number of hospitals participating in the Registry was stable. Data were analyzed using general linear modeling and analysis of variance.

Results. High volume core hospitals reported 83,541 cases of AMI to the Registry during the study period. Approximately 10% more such cases were entered into the Registry in winter or spring than in summer (p < 0.05). The same trends were seen in both northern and southern states, men and women, patients <70 versus ≥70 years of age and those with Q wave versus non-Q wave AMI.

Conclusions. We conclude that there is a seasonal pattern to the reporting rate of cases of AMI in the NRMI. This observation further supports the hypothesis that acute cardiovascular events may be triggered by events that are external to the atherosclerotic plaque.

(J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1684–8)>     

Transfer of patients with acute myocardial infarction for primary or acute angioplasty from hospitals without the facilities to perform angioplasty. Results from the pooled data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Registry and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR)

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) admitted at hospitals without angioplasty facilities there are some subgroups of patients which seem to profit from a transfer to primary or acute angioplasty. However, current clinical practice at such hospitals is unknown. We analyzed the pooled data of the German acute myocardial infarction registries MITRA and the MIR. Angioplasty was not available at 221/271 hospitals (81.5%). Out of 14,487 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to these hospitals, 50.1% (7,259/14,487) received thrombolysis at the initial hospital and 3.6% (523/14,487) were transferred. Out of the transferred patients, 55.3% (289/523) were treated with primary angioplasty and 44.7% (234/523) received a combination of thrombolysis and angioplasty. The proportion of transferred patients increased from 1.1% in 1994 to 5.5% in 1998 (p for trend = 0.001). One hundred and four hospitals (47.1%) never transferred patients. Patients transferred for primary angioplasty (289 patients) were compared to patients treated with thrombolysis at the initial hospitals (7,259 patients). Multivariate analysis showed the following independent predictors for transfer of patients for primary angioplasty: contraindications for thrombolysis (OR = 17.9), a non-diagnostic first ECG (OR = 4.0), pre-hospital delay > 6 hours (OR = 2.5), unknown symptom onset of the acute myocardial infarction (OR = 2.0) and anterior wall acute myocardial infarction (OR = 1.6). Heart failure at admission was the only independent predictor not to transfer patients (OR = 0.40). In Germany only 47.1% of hospitals without angioplasty facilities transfer patients with acute myocardial infarction to primary or acute angioplasty. The proportion of transferred patients increased from 1.1% in 1994 to 5.5% in 1998. Contraindications for thrombolysis were the strongest predictor to transfer patients to primary angioplasty.     

Seasonal Distribution of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction

Objectives. This observational study sought to determine whether cases of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) reported to the second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2) varied by season.Background. The existence of circadian variation in the onset of AMI is well established. Examination of this periodicity has led to new insights into pathophysiologic triggers of atherosclerotic plaque rupture. Although a seasonal pattern for mortality from AMI has been previously noted, it remains unclear whether the occurrence of AMI also displays a seasonal rhythmicity. Documentation of such a pattern may foster investigation of new pathophysiologic determinants of plaque rupture and intracoronary thrombosis.Methods. We analyzed the number of cases of AMI reported to NRMI-2 by season during the period July 1, 1994 to July 31, 1996. Data were normalized so that seasonal occurrence of AMI was reported according to a standard 90-day length.Results. A total of 259,891 cases of AMI were analyzed during the study period. Approximately 53% more cases were reported in winter than during the summer. The same seasonal pattern (decreasing occurrence of reported cases from winter to fall to spring to summer) was seen in men and women, in different age groups and in 9 of 10 geographic areas. In-hospital case fatality rates for AMI also followed a seasonal pattern, with a peak of 9% in winter.Conclusions. The present results suggest that there is a seasonal pattern in the occurrence of AMIs reported to NRMI-2 that is characterized by a marked peak of cases in the winter months and a nadir in the summer months. This pattern was seen in all subgroups analyzed as well as in different geographic areas. These findings suggest that the chronobiology of seasonal variation in AMI may be affected by variables independent of climate.     

Early use of ACE inhibitors in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the United States: experience from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 participants

This study was undertaken to examine recent trends in the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors within 24 hours of admission in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to identify clinical factors associated with ACE inhibitor-prescribing patterns. Demographic, procedural, and acute medication use from 202,438 patients with AMI were collected at 1,470 US hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 from June 1994 through June 1996. Acute ACE inhibitor use increased from 14.0% in 1994 to 17.3% in 1996. After controlling for all important clinical variables, we found that there was a significant increase in the odds of acute ACE inhibitor treatment over time (odds ratio [OR]1.07 for each 180-day period; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.06 to 1.08; p<0.0001). Univariate data suggested that patients treated acutely with ACE inhibitors tended to be older (70.9 vs. 67.2 years) and had lower rates of in-hospital mortality (8.8% vs. 11.0%). Independent predictors of receiving an ACE inhibitor acutely included anterior wall infarction (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.32 to 1.40), Killip class 2 or 3 (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.72 to 1.83), prior myocardial infarction (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.30 to 1.37), prior history of congestive heart failure (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.82 to 1.95), and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.30 to 1.38). Physicians are prescribing ACE inhibitors acutely in patients with AMI with increasing frequency. Patients with evidence of congestive heart failure and those with anterior myocardial infarction have the greatest expected benefit from such therapy, and these persons receive such treatment most often. However, most patients hospitalized with AMI do not receive this potentially life-saving therapy.