Use of topiramate in treatment-resistant bipolar spectrum disorders

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of topiramate as add-on, long-term therapy for treatment-resistant bipolar-spectrum disorders, 34 DSM-IV bipolar-spectrum patients, including bipolar I (n = 28), bipolar II (n = 3), bipolar not otherwise specified (n = 2), and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (n = 1), considered to be resistant to treatment with lithium, carbamazepine, and valproate, received increasing doses of topiramate as adjunctive therapy for their manic (n = 17), depressive (n = 11), hypomanic (n = 3), or mixed (n = 3) symptoms. Outcome measures included the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) for Severity. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Twenty-five patients (74%) completed the 6-month follow-up. Nine patients (26%) dropped out early due to lost of follow-up (n = 4), worsening of symptoms (n = 2), side effects (n = 1), hospitalization due to intercurrent illness (n = 1), and noncompliance (n = 1). By intent-to-treat analysis, there was a significant reduction in YMRS, HAM-D, and CGI scores (p < 0.0001 for all measures at the endpoint) after the introduction of topiramate. Most therapeutic effects appeared between weeks 2 and 6. Fifty-nine percent of manic patients and 55% of depressed patients were considered to be responders to the drug, which was well tolerated; only one patient discontinued due to side effects. The most common side effect was paraesthesia (n = 2). Ten patients experienced moderate weight loss during the follow-up period. The mean topiramate dose at endpoint was 202 +/- 65 mg/day. These preliminary results indicate that adjunctive topiramate may be useful in the long-term treatment of bipolar spectrum disorders, even in the most difficult-to-treat patients.     

Outcomes for Latin American versus White patients suffering from acute mania in a randomized, double-blind trial comparing olanzapine and haloperidol

Data from a published double-blind randomized trial comparing olanzapine versus haloperidol in acute mania were used to address the response and tolerability of Latin American patients. Primary efficacy end point was the remission rate (Young Mania Rating Scale score 相似文献   

Evaluation of C-reactive protein and total serum cholesterol in adult patients with bipolar disorder

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the role of CRP and Total Cholesterol (TC) in patients suffering from type I Bipolar Disorder (BD-I). Moreover, the goal is to elucidate possible CRP and TC differences in different phases of BD-I: acute mania, euthymia and bipolar depression. Medical records of 90 BD-I patients (30 patients with acute mania, 30 in euthymic state, full remission, and 30 in depressive phase) were reviewed to evaluate serum CRP and TC levels. Laboratory data of 30 healthy controls were also obtained. The scores of Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Bech-Rafaelsen Manic Rating Scale (BRMRS) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) were evaluated. CRP levels were higher in acute mania and depressive phase subgroups when compared to healthy controls. CRP was positively associated with BRMRS and YMRS scores in acute mania and with HAM-D in depressive phase subgroups. TC levels were lower in all clinical groups compared to controls. TC levels were negatively correlated to BRMRS, YMRS and HAM-D. In conclusion, the results of the present study support the notion that CRP and TC may be altered in patients with BP-I.     

Ziprasidone in acute bipolar mania: a 21-day randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled replication trial

BACKGROUND: In an earlier 21-day, placebo-controlled trial, ziprasidone was efficacious in improving symptoms of mania and was well tolerated. To confirm these results, a similarly designed 21-day trial was conducted. METHODS: Inpatients with bipolar I disorder, manic or mixed, were randomized to ziprasidone (40 to 80 mg BID) or placebo. Efficacy rating scales were derived from the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Change Bipolar Scale (SADS-CB). SADS-CB-derived Mania Rating Scale (MRS) total score was the primary efficacy parameter. Secondary SADS-CB-derived efficacy parameters included Manic Syndrome and Behavior and Ideation Subscales, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S), the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were also assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-five placebo and 137 ziprasidone patients were evaluable for efficacy. Baseline-to-endpoint mean changes in MRS scores were -11.1 for ziprasidone and -5.6 for placebo (all patients, last observation carried forward [LOCF]; P < 0.01). Ziprasidone produced significantly greater improvements in Manic Syndrome (P < or = 0.01) and Behavior and Ideation Subscales (P < or = 0.001), CGI-S score, (P < or = 0.001), PANSS Total (P < or = 0.01) and Positive Subscale (P < or = 0.001) scores, and GAF (P < or = 0.001). With ziprasidone, significant improvements were observed from Day 2 onward for MRS and CGI-S at all time points except Day 4 for MRS. Treatment-related discontinuations due to adverse events were 5.8% for ziprasidone and 1.5% for placebo (P = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Ziprasidone was well tolerated, rapidly efficacious, and superior to placebo in improving symptoms and global illness severity in these inpatients with acute bipolar mania, both manic and mixed episodes.     

Asenapine as adjunctive treatment for acute mania associated with bipolar disorder: results of a 12-week core study and 40-week extension

In a 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of adjunctive asenapine, bipolar I disorder patients experiencing manic or mixed episodes despite pretreatment with lithium or valproate monotherapy were treated with flexible-dose, twice-daily asenapine 5 or 10 mg (n = 158) or placebo (n = 166). The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score at week 3. Secondary outcomes included YMRS response and remission and Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score changes. Patients completing the core study were eligible for a 40-week double-blind extension assessing safety and tolerability. Adjunctive asenapine significantly improved mania versus placebo at week 3 (primary end point) and weeks 2 to 12. The YMRS response rates were similar at week 3 but significantly better with asenapine at week 12. The YMRS remission rates and changes from baseline on Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder for mania and overall illness were significantly better with asenapine at weeks 3 and 12. No other statistically significant differences on secondary outcomes were observed. Only a small number of patients entered the extension, making firm statistical conclusions on efficacy difficult. Treatment-emergent adverse events reported by 5% or more of asenapine patients and at twice the incidence of placebo were sedation, somnolence, depression/depressive symptoms, oral hypoesthesia, and increased weight in the 12-week core study. Adjunctive asenapine to lithium or valproate was more effective than mood stabilizer monotherapy in the core study and was well tolerated for up to 52 weeks.     

Influence of topiramate on olanzapine-related weight gain in women: an 18-month follow-up observation

In a randomized controlled trial, we compared the efficacy of topiramate versus placebo in women undergoing olanzapine therapy and found that topiramate effectively contributed to weight loss in short-term treatment and had a positive effect on health-related quality of life, the patients' actual state of health, and psychological impairments. The aim of this observational study was to assess whether topiramate has a sustained benefit in long-term treatment of olanzapine-associated weight gain in subjects who had participated in the previous randomized controlled trial comparing topiramate with placebo. The subjects (topiramate group, n = 25; former placebo group, n = 18) were observed in an 18-month open-label study. After unblinding, subjects from the former topiramate group continued treatment with topiramate, whereas subjects from the former placebo group received neither placebo nor topiramate.The subjects were seen every 6 months, weighed, and tested with the SF-36 Health Survey, Scale of Well-Being, and the Adjective Checklist. According to the intent-to-treat principle, the repeated-measures analysis showed a significant interaction for the group-by-time effect for change of weight (P < 0.01) on the Scale of Well-Being (P < 0.01), all scales of the Adjective Checkist (all P < 0.01), and 5 scales (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, social functioning, mental health, and vitality) of the SF-36 Health Survey (all P < 0.01). Topiramate was well tolerated and seems to be effective and safe in the long-term treatment of olanzapine-related adiposity in women. Furthermore, positive changes in the patients' state of health, psychological impairments, and health-related quality of life could be also observed.     

Treatment of bipolar I rapid cycling patients during dysphoric mania with olanzapine

The simultaneous presentation of manic and depressive symptoms in the same patient is fairly common. The terms and have been used as equivalents to mixed states. Pharmacotherapy is less effective in this group of patients. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine as an add-on therapy in patients with bipolar disorder with a rapid cycling course during a dysphoric mania episode. Thirteen patients treated with mood stabilizers for at least 1 year and diagnosed with a mixed episode were included in an open trial. All had at least 4 episodes in the last year. Patients with organic diseases, including altered thyroid function, were excluded from the research. Patients were evaluated at inclusion and at day 28. Response was defined as a decrease of 50% in the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression concomitant with a Clinical Global Impression improvement of 1 or 2. All patients completed the study. The doses of olanzapine were 16.15 +/- 5.82 mg/day. There was a reduction in the manic and depressive symptoms in all patients. Ten of the 13 patients were considered to have responded to the treatment according to the response definition. Adverse effects included somnolence (23.08%) and weight gain (0.81 +/- 1.96 kg in women, 2.20 +/- 2.28 kg in men). Our results suggest that olanzapine combined with mood stabilizers is safe and effective in the treatment of the manic and the depressive symptoms of dysphoric mania with a rapid cycling course.     

Amantadine for weight gain associated with olanzapine treatment.

Patients with schizophrenia (Sch), schizoaffective, schizophreniform, or bipolar (BP) I disorders [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)]; not manic or acutely psychotic [Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score < or =45]; treated with olanzapine for 1-24 months; and who had gained > or =5% of their initial body weight were examined to determine whether amantadine could attenuate weight gain or promote weight loss. Olanzapine (Olz; 5-20 mg/day) was co-administered with double-blind treatment of 100-300 mg/day amantadine (Olz+Amt, n=60) or placebo (Olz+Plc, n=65). Visit-wise analysis of weight showed that weight change from baseline [last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF)] in the Olz+Amt group was significantly different from the Olz+Plc group at weeks 8 (P=0.042), 12 (P=0.029), and 16 (primary endpoint, mean+/-S.D.: -0.19+/-4.58 versus 1.28+/-4.26 kg, P=0.045). Mean BPRS total score, positive subscale, and anxiety-depression scores improved comparably in both groups, and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score improved in the Olz+Amt group. Overall, amantadine was safe, was well tolerated, and attenuated weight gain or promoted weight loss in some patients who had gained weight during olanzapine therapy.     

Zonisamide for bipolar disorder, mania or mixed states: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled adjunctive trial

Objective

This is the first multicenter, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjunctive zonisamide for the treatment of bipolar mania or mixed state.

Experimental design

One hundred four patients with Bipolar Disorder, Type I, II or NOS, in a manic, hypomanic or mixed state of illness were randomized to either adjunctive zonisamide or placebo. The study consisted of three phases: a 7 to 30 day screening and stabilization phase, 6 weeks of blinded treatment and a 1 to 3 week discontinuation phase. The primary outcome variable for manic and hypomanic patients was the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) both the YMRS and Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) served as primary outcome variables for patients in mixed states. Secondary outcome measures included the Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP), the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) and an a priori analysis of response and remission. Metabolic parameters including weight, waist-hip ratio, body mass index, fasting glucose, cholesterol and triglyceride levels were also analyzed. Side effects were measured using the SAFTEE.

Principal observations

There were no statistically significant differences for any of the primary or secondary outcome measures between zonisamide and placebo-treated patients.

Conclusions

In contrast to previous studies that suggested efficacy of adjunctive zonisamide in bipolar mania or mixed state, these results were not confirmed in this double blind controlled study.     

Olanzapine monotherapy for acute depression in patients with bipolar I or II disorder: results of an 8‐week open label trial

We evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of olanzapine monotherapy in 20 adult patients with bipolar I or II disorder, depressed phase. Patients received open‐label olanzapine monotherapy (mean modal dose, 15 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Assessments of psychopathology (Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS], Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology [QIDS‐SR‐16], Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS]), clinical global state (Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] scale), and safety/tolerability were performed at baseline, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks. Seventeen patients (85.0%) completed the study. Improvement in MADRS total scores was observed after the first week of treatment, and at all remaining follow‐up time points (p ≤ 0.005). Parallel improvement in QIDS‐SR‐16 (p < 0.001) and CGI‐Severity (p < 0.001) was observed between baseline and study endpoint. Nine (45%) subjects achieved positive treatment response, eight of whom (40%) also achieved symptom remission. There were significant increases in weight (+3.2 kg, p = 0.001) and body mass index (+1.1 kg/m², p = 0.001), but not fasting glucose or lipids, with the exception of reduced triglyceride levels in the overall sample, and reduced HDL cholesterol in females. Olanzapine may be an effective, well‐tolerated option for treating acute non‐psychotic depression across a variety of bipolar disorder subtypes. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Comparison of short-term venlafaxine versus lithium monotherapy for bipolar II major depressive episode: a randomized open-label study

OBJECTIVE: Practice guidelines for the initial treatment of bipolar II (BP II) major depressive episode (MDE) recommend mood stabilizer (MS) monotherapy or combined MS plus antidepressant drug (AD) therapy. We hypothesized that initial AD monotherapy would be superior to MS monotherapy for BP II MDE with a low hypomanic switch rate. METHODS: Bipolar II MDE patients were randomized to a 12-week open-label treatment with either venlafaxine monotherapy (n = 43) or lithium carbonate monotherapy (n = 40). The primary outcome measure was the 28-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D 28). The secondary outcome measures included the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), clinical global impressions severity and change ratings, and the proportion of patients classified as responder (with > or = 50% reduction in baseline HAM-D score) or as remitter (final HAM-D score, < or = 8). RESULTS: Thirty-four venlafaxine-treated patients (79.1%) and 15 lithium-treated patients (37.5%) completed the trial (P < 0.0005). Venlafaxine monotherapy produced a greater reduction in HAM-D 28 scores, with a difference in change of -6.57 points (95% confidence interval, -11.97 to -1.18) (P = 0.017) between treatment conditions. There was a greater proportion of venlafaxine-treated (vs lithium-treated) patients classified either as treatment responder (58.1% vs 20.0%; P < 0.0005) or as treatment remitter (44.2% vs 7.5%; P < 0.0005) for the HAM-D 28 scores. There was no significant increase in mean YMRS scores over time in the venlafaxine (vs lithium) treatment condition, and no significant increase in mean YMRS scores at any study visit compared with baseline for either treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that AD monotherapy with venlafaxine may be an effective initial therapy for BP II MDE with a low hypomanic switch rate.     

Acute dysphoric mania: treatment response to olanzapine versus placebo

A substantial number of patients with mania have significant concomitant depressive features, and they may respond differently to mood stabilizers than patients with pure mania. This post-hoc analysis explored the response characteristics of olanzapine versus placebo in bipolar I manic patients with dysphoric and nondysphoric mania (differentiated by baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAM-D] score of >20). Two similar, double-blind, randomized trials comparing olanzapine, 5-20 mg, to placebo were pooled for these analyses (N = 246). Mean changes in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) and HAM-D scores during 3 weeks of treatment were examined. Twenty-eight percent of patients had dysphoric mania (olanzapine, n = 33; placebo, n = 35). Among these patients, olanzapine-treated patients had greater improvement within 1 week than did placebo-treated patients on both mania ratings (Y-MRS: -9.7 vs. -3.0 points; = 0.011) and depressive symptom ratings (HAM-D: -9.9 vs. -5.4 points; = 0.025). Among those manic subjects without prominent depressive symptoms (olanzapine, n = 91; placebo, n = 87), mean Y-MRS improvement from baseline to endpoint with olanzapine (-11.5 points) versus placebo (-6.13 points) was comparable to the improvement seen with olanzapine versus placebo in the dysphoric mania subgroup ( = 0.476, test of interaction). In acutely ill manic patients with significant depressive symptoms, olanzapine demonstrated a broad spectrum of efficacy, effectively treating both manic and depressive symptoms. The magnitude of the antimanic response appears similar, regardless of baseline depressive features. Additional experience with putative mood stabilizers and atypical agents in mixed mania should include an exploration of their efficacy in treating both manic and depressive mood symptoms.     

Risperidone plus lithium versus risperidone plus valproate in acute and continuation treatment of mania

This exploratory analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of risperidone when added to two different mood stabilizers (lithium or valproate) for mania in bipolar disorder. Patients receiving lithium or valproate at baseline were drawn from the database of a 12-week, open-label risperidone study. The primary efficacy measure was the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Other assessments included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of improvement, and safety measures. The analysis included 33 patients on lithium plus risperidone and 46 patients on valproate plus risperidone. Both subgroups had comparable baseline YMRS scores (lithium 28.2, valproate 28.7) and both had significant reductions in score by week 1 (P<0.0001). Comparable reductions in score continued for both subgroups until the end of the study (YMRS scores at week 12: lithium 4.6 and valproate 6.7). There were no significant differences in response rates (> or =50% improvement on YMRS) or remission rates (YMRS score < or = 8) between the two subgroups. At week 12, 88% of the lithium plus risperidone patients and 80% of the valproate plus risperidone patients were in remission. Similarly, HAM-D scores were significantly and comparably reduced in both subgroups, and improvement in CGI was the same. There was no difference between subgroups in the incidence of adverse events or weight gain. These data suggest that risperidone can be safely combined with either lithium or valproate, and that the efficacy is similar regardless of the mood stabilizer used.     

Switching from other agents to extended-release carbamazepine in acute mania

There is a dearth of available knowledge relating to the efficacy of switching from one psychotropic agent to another in treating patients with acute mania. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of data from two randomized, placebo-controlled trials of carbamazepine extended-release capsules (CBZ-ERC) in the treatment of mania, to evaluate the efficacy of CBZ-ERC in patients previously nonresponsive to lithium (n 5 40), olanzapine (n 5 38), or valproate (VPA, n 5 77). Results: In patients previously on lithium, Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores improved significantly from baseline to end point (27.4 6 SD 3.5 vs. 15.8 6 11.1; P 5 .0002). In patients previously on VPA or olanzapine, YMRS scores significantly improved in both CBZ-ERC- and placebo-treated groups (VPA: CBZ-ERC, P , .0001; placebo, P 5 .0002; olanzapine: CBZ-ERC, P , .0001; placebo, P 5 .0054). Improvement in YMRS was significantly greater in CBZ-ERC-treated patients versus placebo in subjects previously nonresponsive to lithium (CBZ-ERC 11.6 6 10.3 vs. placebo 4.0 6 11.2, P 5 .03), or VPA (CBZ-ERC 10.8 6 11.9 vs. placebo 5.7 6 9.2; P 5 .04), and trending to be greater for those previously nonresponsive to olanzapine (olanzapine 13.2 6 9.3 vs. placebo 7.3 6 9.7, P 5 .06). Conclusions: CBZ-ERC is an effective therapy for bipolar patients previously nonresponsive to lithium or valproate. Medication switch is frequently associated with symptom improvement.     

Efficacy of olanzapine monotherapy for treatment of bipolar I depression: a randomized,double-blind,placebo controlled study

Rationale and objective

Depression symptoms are now recognized to be the predominant cause of disability for bipolar disorder (BD) patients. The treatment strategies for the depressed phase of BD remain more anecdotal than data-based. Olanzapine has been investigated as an alternative to antidepressants and a mood stabilizer for acute bipolar depression. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of olanzapine monotherapy for bipolar I depression.

Method

Sixty-eight patients with bipolar I depression were randomly assigned to treatment with olanzapine (mean final dose 14.4 mg/day) (n?=?34) or placebo (n?=?34) in a double-blind parallel-group study design. Planned assessments included Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S), Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I), Hamilton Depression scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAMA), and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS).

Results

Of the 68 patients who were randomly assigned, 57 (83.8 %) completed treatments. Improvements in MADRS total score, CGI-S, CGI-I, and HAMD in the olanzapine group were significantly greater relative to those in the placebo group during the 8-week follow-up period (p?<?0.001, p?=?0.0017, p?=?0.007, and p?<?0.001, respectively). Rates of categorical treatment response and remission in the olanzapine group (50.0 % and 35.3 %, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the placebo group (20.6 %, p?=?0.011 and 11.8 %, p?=?0.022, respectively). At the 8-week treatment, the mean weight and the total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels increased significantly in the olanzapine group (p?=?0.037, p?=?0.029, p?=?0.030, and p?=?0.028, respectively).

Conclusions

Olanzapine is effective in the treatment of bipolar I depression but is associated with significant metabolic side effects.     

卡马西平单用及其与逍遥散合用治疗双相情感障碍随机双盲安慰剂对照临床研究

目的 评估卡马西平单用及其与逍遥散合用治疗双相情感障碍的疗效和安全性。方法 用随机双盲安慰剂对照方法，双相躁狂82例，双相抑郁76例，各随机分为3组。双相躁狂疗程8周，双相抑郁疗程12周。用Young与Bech—Rafaelsen躁狂量表、Hamilton与Montgomery—Asberg抑郁量表和临床总体印象量表评定疗效，用副反应量表观察药物不良反应。结果 双相躁狂患者3组药物临床有效率分别为：逍遥散合用卡马西平为79％，卡马西平单用为64％，安慰剂为45％，3组比较有显著性差异（P〈0．05）。双相抑郁患者3组药物临床有效率分别为：逍遥散合用卡马西平为75％，卡马西平单用为59％，安慰剂为33％，3组比较有显著性差异（P〈0．05）。逍遥散合用卡马西平较卡马西平单用，在头昏、视力模糊、皮疹、恶心发生率增加。结论 逍遥散作为辅助药物治疗双相障碍有效，但能增加卡马西平药物不良反应发生率。     

Quetiapine monotherapy for mania associated with bipolar disorder: combined analysis of two international,double-blind,randomised, placebo-controlled studies

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of quetiapine monotherapy for mania in bipolar disorder by an a priori defined combined analysis of data from two placebo-controlled studies.

Method: The intent-to-treat (ITT) populations from two studies of patients with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder, manic episode, randomised to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with quetiapine (up to 800?mg/day) or placebo were combined. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score from baseline to Day 21. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in YMRS to Day 84, YMRS response and remission rates and change from baseline to Days 21 and 84 in the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), Clinical Global Impressions – Bipolar (CGI-BP) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). These endpoints were analysed as continuous variables, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with the baseline as covariate. In order to account for any difference in response between studies, the analyses were stratified by study as a fixed effect, and centre as a random effect. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test was used to analyse binary variables. A chi square test was used to compare the frequency of adverse events between the treatment groups.

Results: The combined analysis included a total of 403 patients from two quetiapine monotherapy studies in patients with bipolar I disorder. A significant improvement in YMRS score was observed from Day 4 (?p = 0.021) onward in the quetiapine group compared with placebo. The treatment advantage of quetiapine over placebo continued to increase to Day 21 (?p < 0.001) and Day 84 (?p < 0.001). Significantly more quetiapine-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved a response (?p < 0.001). The average quetiapine dose in responders was approximately 600?mg daily. Of adverse events occurring in ≥ 5% of patients, quetiapine-treated patients had a significantly greater incidence versus placebo of somnolence (16.3% vs. 4.0%), dry mouth (15.8% vs. 3%), weight gain (9.1% vs. 1.5%) and dizziness (6.7% vs. 2.5%).

Conclusions: The data from this combined analysis support the results from the individual studies and indicate that quetiapine monotherapy is effective across a broad range of mood symptoms, fast-acting and well tolerated in the treatment of mania.     

Olanzapine compared to lithium in mania: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Neuroleptics are of established efficacy in mania. Controlled data on the use of olanzapine in mania is however, absent. In this study, 30 patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for mania were randomly allocated to receive either olanzapine or lithium in a 4 week double-blind randomized controlled design. There were no significant outcome differences between the two groups on any of the primary outcome measures, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (lithium 28.2; olanzapine 28.0; P = 0.44); Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement scale (lithium 2.75, olanzapine 2.36; P = 0.163) or the Mania Scale (lithium 13.2, olanzapine 10.2; P = 0.315). Olanzapine was however, significantly superior to lithium on the CGI-severity scale at week 4 (lithium 2.83, olanzapine 2.29; P = 0.025). Olanzapine did not differ from lithium in terms of treatment emergent extrapyramidal side-effects as measured by the Simpson-Angus Scale. Olanzapine appears to be at least as effective as lithium in the treatment of mania.     

A pilot study of topiramate as monotherapy in the treatment of acute mania

This small-scale pilot study was performed to grossly document safety and any evidence of efficacy of topiramate in bipolar disorder. Ten patients hospitalized for acute mania were given open-label topiramate monotherapy for up to 28 days. The mean Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score decreased from 32 (range, 26-40) at baseline to 22 (range, 2-40) at the end of the study. Five patients exhibited evidence of moderate to marked improvement, three subjects had at least a 50% reduction in YMRS scores, and the other two patients experienced an improvement of 25% to 49% on the YMRS. The preliminary findings of this small series suggest that topiramate may be effective in acute mania. Double-blind controlled trials are now needed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of topiramate in bipolar disorder.     

Olanzapine for schizophrenia refractory to typical and atypical antipsychotics: an open-label, prospective trial

The role of olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia is still unresolved. This article presents an open-label, prospective, 14-week trial with olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder selected for unambiguous resistance to either clozapine or risperidone and to typical antipsychotics. Forty-three inpatients (mean age, 41.6 years; mean duration of illness, 21.7 years) were enrolled and treated after cross-titration from their previous antipsychotic treatment with olanzapine 10 to 40 mg daily without any concomitant antipsychotic medication. Patients were evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impressions Scale, and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale. The change with olanzapine treatment was associated with a PANSS total score improvement of 3.7 (SD = 15.6; not significant). There was a significant improvement for the PANSS cognitive and depression/anxiety factors, whereas the PANSS excitement factor worsened. The improvement rate was superior in patients receiving olanzapine doses higher than 20 mg. A total of 16.7% of patients reached response criteria set forth by a previous study. There was a significant decrease in extrapyramidal side effects (t = 2.04; p < 0.05) and statistically significant, yet modest, weight gain. These results indicate that olanzapine is only modestly effective in these severely treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia. However, a trial with olanzapine can be recommended in these patients before moving to augmentation strategies, given the lack of proven alternatives and the observation that 16.7% of patients reached the response criteria.