Tumor markers in dialysis-dependent renal failure. A comparison of the mucin-like carcinoma antigen, CA 15-3, CA 125, CA 19-9 and CEA antigens

The concentration of tumor markers in human sera is affected not only by malignant, but also by many benign diseases. In this regard, only few reports exist about renal insufficiency, whereas influences of different liver diseases have frequently been described. We determined the serum levels of the antigens MCA, CA 15-3, CA 125, CA 19-9, and CEA in 50 patients suffering from renal insufficiency in chronic hemodialysis, but without indication of malignant diseases. We found no difference between the serum concentrations of MCA and CA 125 as compared to the healthy control group, whereas the other antigens were more often elevated in the group of patients (CEA, 24% of patients greater than 5 ng/ml; CA 15-3, 20% of patients greater than 30 U/ml; CA 19-9, 14% of patients greater than 40 U/ml). We did not find any correlation between pathological values of markers and diseases leading to renal failure. As the increase of tumor markers could not be explained by concomitant diseases, it seems likely that the terminal renal insufficiency plays a causal role.     

Combined Detection of CEA,CA 19-9, CA 242 and CA 50 in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Resectable Gastric Cancer

Our aim was to investigate the value of combined detection of serum  carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, CA 242 and CA 50 in diagnosis and assessment of prognosis in consecutive gastric cancer patients. Clinical data including preoperative serum CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242, and CA 50 values and information on clinical pathological factors were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were used to explore the relationship between tumor markers and survival. Positive rates of tumor markers CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242 and CA 50 in the diagnosis of gastric cancer were 17.7, 17.1, 20.4 and 13.8%, respectively, and the positive rate for all four markers combined was 36.6%. Patients with elevated preoperative serum concentrations of CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242 and CA 50, had late clinical tumor stageand significantly poorer overall survival. Five-year survival rates in patients with elevated CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242 and CA 50 were 28.1, 25.8, 27.0 and 24.1%, respectively, compared with 55.0, 55.4, 56.4 and 54.5% in patients with these markers at normal levels (p<0.01). In multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses, an elevated CA 242 level was determined to be an independent prognostic marker in gastric cancer patients. Combined detection of four tumor markers increased the positive rate for gastric cancer diagnosis. CA 242 showed higher diagnostic value and CA 50 showed lower diagnostic value. In resectable gastric carcinoma, preoperative CA 242 level was associated with disease stage, and was found to be a significant independent prognostic marker in gastric cancer patients.     

Comparison of a new tumour marker CA 242 with CA 19-9, CA 50 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in digestive tract diseases

The levels of CA 242, a new tumour marker of carbohydrate nature, were measured in sera of 185 patients with malignancies of the digestive tract and of 123 patients with benign digestive tract diseases. High percentages of elevated CA 242 levels (greater than 20 U ml-1) were recorded in patients with pancreatic and biliary cancers (68%). The sensitivity was somewhat lower than that of CA 19-9 (76%) and CA 50 (73%). On the other hand, in benign pancreatic and biliary tract diseases the CA 242 level was less frequently elevated than the CA 19-9 and CA 50 levels. The serum CA 242 concentration was increased in 55% of patients with colorectal cancer. CA 242 detected more Dukes A-B carcinomas (47%) than CEA (32%), whereas CEA was more often elevated (71% vs 59%) in Dukes C-D carcinomas. CA 242 was slightly elevated (ad 41 U ml-1) in 10% of patients with benign colorectal diseases. CA 50 and CA 19-9 had lower sensitivities than CA 242 using the recommended cut-off values. When cut-off levels based on relevant benign colorectal diseases were used, the sensitivities of these markers were similar and somewhat higher than that of CEA. Less than half of patients with gastric cancer (44%) had an elevated CA 242 serum level. CA 242 is a promising new tumour marker, that may be of additional value in the diagnosis of pancreatic and biliary, as well as colorectal cancer, and may be useful in monitoring cancer patients after radical surgery.     

Evaluation of seven tumor markers (CA 50, CA 19-9, CA 19-9 TruQuant, CA 72-4, CA 195, carcinoembryonic antigen, and tissue polypeptide antigen) in the pretreatment sera of patients with gastric carcinoma.

Preoperative serum levels of the tumor markers CA 50, CA 19-9, CA 19-9 TruQuant, CA 72-4, CA 195, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) were measured in 94 patients with well-staged adenocarcinoma of the stomach and in 15 patients with benign gastric diseases. In all patients with carcinoma, a laparotomy was done. The serum levels were correlated with the stage of disease, the location of the primary tumor, and the resectability and grade of differentiation. The marker CA 50 was the best, with an overall positivity of 59.5%. For CA 19-9, this figure was 34%; for CA 19-9 TruQuant, 22%; for CA 72-4, 34%; for CA 195, 29%; for CEA, 33%; and for TPA, 50%. The best combination of two markers was CA 50 and TPA; this combination gave a positivity of 81%. There was no evident correlation with stage of disease and the percentage of positive serum levels or the median serum levels. The marker CA 50 gave the widest range of elevated serum levels between the cutoff level and the 90th percentile (54%). Patients with carcinoma of the cardia had higher preoperative serum levels than those with a tumor in other parts of the stomach. There was no correlation with the resectability of the tumor and the preoperative serum level. Patients with an undifferentiated tumors did not have significantly lower serum levels than those with more differentiated tumors. Currently, preoperative determination of serum tumor marker levels in patients with gastric carcinoma has no significant in clinical practice.     

Sequential measurement of serum CA 125 levels in Krukenberg's tumor

CA 125 is a tumor marker for ovarian cancer developed by hybridoma technology. In the present study, the levels of CA 125 were sequentially measured in the serum of five patients with Krukenberg's tumor originating in the gastrointestinal tract. Four out of the five (80%) had elevated serum CA 125 levels, i.e., greater than 35 U/ml and, in most cases, these levels decreased after resection of the ovarian tumor. Serum CA 19-9 and CEA levels were also increased in two (40%) and three (60%) patients, respectively, and, in these positive cases, reflected the clinical course. The results indicated the clinical usefulness of these cancer markers in Krukenberg's tumor.     

CEA,CA19—9,CA50联合检测对胃肠道肿瘤的诊断价值

采用放射免疫法检测４１例胃肠恶性肿瘤和２０名健康人血清癌胚抗原（ＣＥＡ），糖链抗原（ＣＡ１９－９、ＣＡ５０）含量，并与癌组织学分类、有无淋巴结转移对比分析。结果显示：胃肠肿瘤ＣＥＡ、ＣＡ１９－９、ＣＡ５０值明显高于对照组（Ｐ〈０．０１）。胃癌伴肝、胰转移时ＣＡ１９－９增高尤其显著，胃癌ＣＡ５０值高于大肠癌（Ｐ〈０．０５）。胃肠肿瘤淋巴结转移者三项指标检出率较无转移者高，但差异无显著性。病理分类中胃     

Clinical evaluation of the simultaneous determination of tumor markers in fluid and serum and their ratio in the differential diagnosis of serous effusions.

We evaluated the diagnostic utility of simultaneous determination of 5 tumor markers, CEA, CA 125, CA 15-3, CA 19-9 and cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA 21-1), in fluid and serum from 101 patients, 52 with pleural effusion (22 malignant) and 49 patients with ascites (14 malignant). Tumor marker concentrations in fluid from patients with malignant effusions were significantly higher than those obtained in benign fluids or serum. However, there are two types of tumor markers: those released/secreted by normal mesothelia such as CA 125 and cytokeratin 19 (higher levels in benign fluids than in serum) and non-released/secreted tumor markers (low concentrations in benign fluids) such as CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 15-3. The fluid/serum (F/S) ratio showed better sensitivity with maximum specificity than a single determination in fluid for CEA, CA 15-3 and CA 19-9, but not for CA 125 and CYFRA. The combination of a F/S ratio greater than 1.2 and a cut-off of 5 ng/ml for CEA, 30 U/ml for CA 15-3 and 37 U/ml for CA 19-9 showed sensitivities of 58, 57 and 44%, respectively, and a specificity of 100%, with a combined sensitivity of 82% for overall effusions and 79% for fluids with negative cytology with a specificity of 100%. In conclusion, the use of the F/S ratio in nonsecreted tumor markers such as CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 15-3 improve the sensitivity and specificity and allow standardization of the cut-off.     

Application of Joint Detection of AFP,CA19-9, CA125 and CEA in Identification and Diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma

Objective: To explore the application of joint detection of serum AFP, CA19-9, CA125 and CEA in identificationand diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma (CC). Materials and Methods: The levels of serum AFP, CA19-9, CA125and CEA of both 30 patients with CC and 30 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were assessed.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic effects of single and jointdetection of those 4 kinds of tumor markers for CC. Results: The levels of serum CA19-9, CA125 and CEAin CC patients were higher than that in HCC patients,whereas that of serum AFP was significantly lower s.The area under ROC curve of single detection of serum AFP, CA19-9, CA125 and CEA were 0.05, 0.86, 0.84and 0.83, with the optimal cutoff values of 15.4 ng/ml, 125.1 U/ml, 95.7 U/ml and 25.9 ng/ml, correspondingly,and the percentage correct single diagnosis was <79%. With joint detection, the diagnostic effect of combinedAFP, CA19-9, CA125 and CEA was the highest, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.94 (95%CI 0.88~0.99).Conclusions: Single detection of serum CA19-9, CA125 and EA is not meaningful. The sensitivity, specificity,the rate of correct diagnosis and the area under ROC curve of joint detection of AFP, CA19-9, CA125 and CEAare highest, indicating that the joint detection of these 4 tumor markers is of great importance in the diagnosisof CC.     

c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, CEA, and CA 15.3 in patients with breast cancer: prognostic value

The diagnostic value of a new tumor marker, c-erbB-2, was studied in the sera of 50 healthy subjects, 58 patients with benign breast diseases, and 413 patients with breast cancer (186 locoregional, 185 with advanced disease, and 42 with no evidence of disease). Using 15 U/ml as the cut-off, no healthy subjects or patients with benign diseases and only 2.4% of no evidence of disease patients had elevated serum levels. Abnormal c-erbB-2 levels were found in 29% (101/370) of the patients with breast carcinoma (locoregional 9%, metastases 45.4%). CEA (cut-off 5 U/ml) and CA 15.3 (cut-off 35 U/ml) sensitivity was 18% and 16% in patients with locoregional disease and 61% and 70% in those patients with advanced disease, respectively. A trend toward higher serum levels of all three tumor markers in patients with nodal involvement or greater tumor size was found, but was statistically significant only with CEA (p < 0.01). By contrast, c-erbB-2 was related to steroid receptors, in both locoregional and metastatic tumors. When the prognostic value of these markers was evaluated, patients with abnormally high presurgical CEA and c-erbB-2 had a worse prognosis than those patients with normal values, in both node-negative (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) and node-positive patients (p < 0.556 and p < 0.001, respectively). By contrast, no relationship was found between CA 15.3 values and prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that CEA and c-erbB-2 were also prognostic factors. The correlation between serum and tissue levels of c-erbB-2 was studied in the tumors of 161 patients. Significantly higher c-erbB-2 serum levels were found in patients with overexpression in tissue by immunohistochemistry, in both locoregional and advanced disease (p=0.0001). Serum concentrations in patients with advanced disease were related to the site of recurrence, with significantly higher values in patients with metastases (mainly in those with liver metastases) than in those with locoregional recurrence. In summary, c-erbB-2 serum levels seem to be a useful tumor marker in the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. Using all three tumor markers, sensitivity was 35% in patients with locoregional breast cancer and 88% in patients with recurrence.     

Diagnostic significance of the tumour markers CEA, CA 15-3 and CA 125 in malignant effusions in breast cancer

Concentrations of the tumour-associated antigens CEA, CA 15-3 and CA 125 were determined in serous effusions (EF) from patients (pts) with breast cancer. As controls, serous effusions from patients with benign and other malignant diseases were used. The EF levels were also compared with those of serum. CA 15-3 was elevated (greater than 35 U/ml) in 65.7% of breast cancer EF, in 39.3% of EF in various other malignant diseases and in 0% of benign EF. CEA was elevated (greater than 9 ng/ml) in 37.5% of breast cancer EF, in 17.9% of EF of various other malignant diseases and in 27% of benign EF. CA 125 was elevated (greater than 35 U/ml) in 93.8% of breast cancer EF, in 78.6% of EF of various other malignant diseases and in 58.8% of benign EF. There was a statistically significant correlation between EF and serum values for the markers studied. Sensitivity and specificity for CA 15-3 were 65.7% and 76.6%, for CEA 37.5% and 77.7% and for CA 125 93.8% and 28.7%, respectively. CA 15-3 is a marker with definite diagnostic accuracy compared to CEA and CA 125 in breast cancer EF. CA 125 appears to derive from proliferating mesothelia rather than cancer cells alone and occurs in a broad spectrum of malignant as well as benign EF. The above markers should not be used alone for diagnosis of breast cancer in patients with serous effusions.     

Serial levels of CA 19-9 and CEA in colonic cancer

The use of serial carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 assays was assessed by comparison with serial carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) levels on the plasmas of 53 patients with colorectal carcinoma. The patients had all undergone resection for their primary tumors and in six instances subsequent resections for hepatic metastases. Initial CA 19-9 levels were greater than or equal to 37 U/mL in 22 of the 53 patients (41%) and in 68% of the patients with metastatic disease. Similar trends of serial CA 19-9 and CEA levels were found in 79% of the 53 patients. One patient with initially normal CEA levels had elevated CA 19-9 levels from the start. In ten of the 53 patients (19%), serial CA 19-9 levels remained low despite tumor recurrence or progression, and despite increasing CEA levels above 5 ng/mL. The increasing serial CEA trends predicted recurrence in 88% and increasing CA 19-9 trends in 50% of cases, which was increased to 70% by including trends of CA 19-9 levels below 37 U/mL. Following hepatic lobectomy, both serial CEA and CA 19-9 levels decreased rapidly. Used alone, serial CA 19-9 levels did not appear to be as sensitive as standard CEA in this retrospective study of selected patients.     

Diagnostic value of CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1, NSE and TSA assay in pleural effusions

The aim of this study was to evaluate the individual and combined diagnostic utility of six tumor markers in patients with pleural effusion. Pleural and serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and total sialic acid (TSA) were assayed in 74 patients with pleural effusions (44 malignant and 30 benign). All tumor markers except TSA and NSE were increased in both serum and pleural fluid of patients with malignant diseases. Using the cut-off values 3 ng/ml, 14 U/ml, 5 U/ml, 8 ng/ml and 70 mg/dl for pleural fluid CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1 and TSA, respectively, the sensitivity (%) and specificity (%) of these tumor markers were as follows: CEA; 52/77, CA 15-3; 80/93, CA 19-9; 36/83, CYFRA 21-1; 91/90, TSA; 80/67, for differentiating malignant effusions from benign. When CA 15-3 and CYFRA 21-1 combined, the sensitivity and specificity were increased (100 and 83%, respectively). Classifying the malignant effusions as bronchial carcinoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma, CEA was shown to have the highest sensitivity and specificity (88 and 90%, respectively) while the combination of CEA with other tumor markers increased sensitivity but decreased specificity. According to our results, tumor markers are not suitable for the differential diagnosis of malignancy.     

Analysis of the levels of CA125, carcinoembryonic antigen, and CA19-9 in the cervical mucus for a detection of cervical adenocarcinoma

To verify whether analysis of the levels of CA125, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and CA19-9 in the cervical mucus is effective for a detection of cervical adenocarcinomas or not, simultaneous measurement of these three tumor markers in the cervical mucus samples from women without gynecologic disorders, with leiomyoma, with cervical squamous cell carcinomas, and with cervical adenocarcinomas was performed. Extremely high levels of CA125 with low levels of both CEA and CA19-9 were demonstrated in the cervical mucus samples from women without gynecologic disorders and with leiomyoma. The cervical mucus samples from cervical adenocarcinomas showed low CA125 levels with extremely high CEA and/or CA19-9 levels. Therefore, analysis of the levels of these three tumor markers in the cervical mucus possibly helps in the diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinomas if CEA and/or CA19-9 show extremely high levels. When a ratio of (CEA + CA19-9)/CA125 was calculated, all women without gynecologic disorders and with leiomyoma showed a ratio less than 0.5, whereas ten of 11 cases of cervical adenocarcinomas had a ratio greater than or equal to 0.5. Only one case of microinvasive adenocarcinoma showed a ratio less than 0.5. Accordingly, the ratio greater than or equal to 0.5 strongly suggested an existence of cervical adenocarcinoma, although it included some cases of squamous cell carcinomas (four of 17 cases).     

Evaluation of the utility of a radioimmunoassay for serum CA 19-9 levels in patients before and after treatment of carcinoma of the pancreas

By radioimmunoassay we determined circulating levels of a tumor-associated antigen, CA 19-9, in 47 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, to learn if serial testing was useful in predicting prognosis or in detecting disease progression. Before treatment, 42 (89%) had an abnormal serum level, and 45 (96%) had an abnormal level at some time during the disease course. A pretreatment value of less than 1,000 U/mL (normal, less than or equal to 37 U/mL) was found in 38 patients; 20 (53%) had resectable disease. One of nine patients (11%) with a pretreatment value greater than 1,000 U/mL had resectable disease (P2 = .05). Among 14 patients who underwent pancreatectomy and were studied serially, the CA 19-9 level normalized in eight; seven (88%) survived greater than or equal to 18 months. Six patients whose levels did not normalize after pancreatectomy all died in less than 12 months (P2 less than .005). Greatly elevated levels occurred in 11 patients after pancreatectomy 1 to 7 months before clinically apparent recurrence. The other three patients without significant elevations remain clinically free of disease. The data suggest that serial determination of serum CA 19-9 levels are useful as a prognostic indicator and in detecting disease recurrence following pancreatectomy. Concurrent determinations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels showed abnormal preoperative values in 28 of 46 patients tested (61%). Concurrent serial postoperative determinations of CEA were available in ten patients. Whereas CA 19-9 values clearly indicated eight recurrences, CEA was helpful in only four. In this small group of patients, CA 19-9 was a better predictor of recurrence.     

Serum levels and clinical evaluation of CA 19-9 in various diseases

We evaluated the clinical significance of serum CA 19-9 in various cancers, benign diseases and healthy controls. The percentage of positive cases for CA 19-9 (higher than 37 U/ml) was 83% in pancreas cancer, 78% in biliary tract cancer and 75% in urinary tract cancer. Benign diseases showed a low frequency of positive cases for CA 19-9, and their serum levels of CA 19-9 were low. Benign diseases with high serum levels of CA 19-9 were rarely seen, but they were easy to differentiate from malignant tumors by simultaneous examination of other tumor markers. In cancer patients with high serum levels of CA 19-9, CA 19-9 showed a weak positive correlation to CEA and ferritin.     

Diagnostic accuracy of a new tumor serologic marker, CA 19-9: comparison with CEA

Two hundred and twenty-one hospitalized patients underwent serum determination of CA 19-9, a recently developed tumor marker assay, and CEA. Among these, 53 had a gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, 59 a GI benign disease, 52 a non-GI cancer, and 57 a non-GI benign disease. CA 19-9 assay was more accurate than CEA to detect malignancy, especially of GI source (69.8% sensitivity vs. 24.5% in GI patients); when a cutoff level of 41 ng/ml for CA 19-9 was considered, only 6 false-positive cases were found and both markers showed excellent specificity (94.9% for CEA and 89.9% for CA 19-9 in gastric, hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer). We conclude that CA 19-9 is a useful GI tumor marker and it seems to be better than CEA in some pathologic situations.     

Initial clinical evaluation of an immunoradiometric assay for CA 19-9 using the NCI serum bank

More than 1,600 coded sera obtained from blood donors and the NCI/Mayo Clinic Serum Bank were analyzed with an improved immunoradiometric assay for the carbohydrate antigenic determinant, CA 19-9. Results indicated that CA 19-9 is elevated in a large fraction of sera (67%) from patients with advanced adenocarcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, including those with pancreatic, hepatobiliary and gastric carcinomas. Several of these sera had CA 19-9 exceeding 300,000 U/ml. A smaller fraction (18%) of patients with carcinomas of the large bowel had elevated serum CA 19-9 levels, the majority among patients with metastatic disease. In contrast, none of the healthy donors from the serum bank and only 4 of 1,023 of the blood donor specimens (0.4%) had CA 19-9 levels greater than or equal to 40 U/ml. Three of 235 sera (1.3%) from benign disease patients had levels of CA 19-9 in excess of 40 U/ml. These data suggest that the improved CA 19-9 immunoradiometric assay may have clinical utility as a diagnostic adjunct for adenocarcinoma of the upper GI tract and that the assay also may have some value in monitoring patients with advancing colorectal carcinoma, particularly in combination with CEA determinations. Rigorous prospective clinical trials will be necessary to verify these hypotheses.     

Tumor markers of pancreatic cancer

To determine the clinical usefulness for diagnosis and monitoring of pancreatic tumor markers, serum levels of CA 19-9 (RIA; less than or equal to 37U/ml), POA (EIA; less than 11 U/ml), CEA (EIA; less than or equal to 4.4 ng/ml) and TPA (RIA; less than or equal to 110 U/ml) were measured in 57 patients with pancreatic cancer and 25 patients with benign diseases of the pancreas. Frequencies of elevation for pancreatic cancers were 73.9% for CA 19-9, 69.2% for POA, 48.9% for CEA and 73.2% for TPA. Furthermore, the frequencies of elevation at relatively early stages of pancreatic cancer were not high. It was therefore thought that these markers were unsuitable for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancers. Although serum levels of CA 19-9 and POA in cases of pancreatic cancer were distributed up to on extremely high level, those for benign diseases of the pancreas were located up to twice the values of the cut-off levels. Therefore, these two markers seem promising for differentiating preoperatively between pancreatic cancer and benign diseases of the pancreas. CA 19-9 and POA were also useful for monitoring the recurrence of pancreatic cancer. In particular, patients with high preoperative levels seem good candidates for postoperative monitoring.     

Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 in gastric carcinoma.

The prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 tumor markers was investigated in patients with gastric cancer. Eighty-two patients who underwent surgical resection of gastric cancer were entered in the study. Correlation analyses showed that CA 72-4 was more frequently positive in patients with advanced tumors (p = 0.04), lymph node invasion (p = 0.02), liver metastasis (p = 0.02) and peritoneal involvement (p = 0.03). CA 19-9 was more frequently positive in patients with advanced tumors (p = 0.01) and with serosal (p = 0.04), lymph node (p = 0.008) and peritoneal involvement (p = 0.02). CEA was more frequently positive in patients with liver metastasis (p = 0.03). Low 3-year cumulative survival was significantly associated with elevated serum levels of CA 72-4 (p = 0.004), CA 19-9 (p = 0.001) and CEA (p < 0.001). Age, tumor stage and CA 72-4 provided prognostic information in the multivariate analysis. Patients with elevated serum levels of CA 72-4 showed a 4.2 times higher risk of death than patients with low levels of the marker. Our results suggest that CA 72-4 has prognostic value in gastric cancer, and patients with a high preoperative serum level of CA 72-4 have a greater risk of death due to gastric cancer.     

CA19-9、CA50、CA242、CEA检测对胰腺癌早期诊断的意义

目的　探讨CA19- 9、CA5 0、CA2 42、CEA肿瘤标志物联合检测对早期诊断胰腺癌 (PCA)的意义。方法　采用放射免疫分析法 ,检测 5 6例PCA患者及 5 4例胰腺良性疾病患者血清CA19- 9、CA5 0、CA2 42、CEA值并进行比较分析。结果　PCA患者血清CA19- 9(10 8± 148)、CA5 0 (45± 80 )、CA2 42 (78± 5 4)、CEA(3 5± 2 7)。与对照组血清CA19- 9(2 9± 3 6) ,CA5 0 (2 0± 3 0 )、CA2 42 (2 0± 14)、CEA(2 5± 12 )比较有非常显著差别(P <0 0 1)。结果　胰腺恶性肿瘤患者中 ,血清CA19- 9、CA5 0、CA2 42、CEA标志物含量明显高于胰腺良性疾病 ,且CA19- 9阳性率较高 (76 8% )。肿瘤越大CA19- 9水平越高 ;当癌肿手术后复发、转移时 ,均有CA19- 9再度明显升高 ,可早期发现以随时调整治疗方案。PCA标志物联合检测阳性率 (92 % ) ,明显高于单检阳性率 (76 8% )。四种标志物之间有相关性及互补性 ,可显著提高PCA的早期诊断 ,并有助于与良性胰腺疾病鉴别