Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: Comparison of forceps versus cesarean section

Objectives.?To compare the immediate maternal and neonatal morbidity in women delivered by forceps or cesarean section after failed ventouse delivery.

Methods.?Case notes of 400 consecutive successful ventouse deliveries compared with 342 failed ventouse deliveries, where delivery was subsequently achieved with either forceps (N = 247) or cesarean section (N = 95), which took place between October 1999 and May 2003, were reviewed.

Results.?Failed ventouse delivery was associated with an increased chance for fetal malposition (OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.6 – 5.3) and postpartum hemorrhage (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8 – 6.8). Compared to forceps after failed ventouse, cesarean section was associated with a higher prevalence of postpartum hemorrhage (OR 7.8, 95% CI 3.6 – 16.9) and fewer third degree perineal tears (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between cesarean section and forceps delivery after failed ventouse for neonatal morbidity.

Conclusions.?Failure of ventouse delivery is 3 – 4 times more likely with a fetal malposition and is associated with an increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage. While cesarean section increases the postpartum hemorrhage rate, forceps delivery is associated with increased likelihood of third degree perineal tears. The neonatal morbidity was comparable regardless of whether forceps or cesarean was used after failed ventouse.     

Characteristics and outcome of deliveries by forceps after failed ventouse.

With the increasing use of the ventouse, it is becoming common for deliveries to be completed by the application of forceps. We present 48 cases delivered by forceps after a failed ventouse and compare these with 63 cases delivered by forceps only. There was significantly higher incidence of caesarean sections and cephalhaematoma in the group where forceps delivery was attempted after a failed ventouse compared to those delivered with forceps only.     

Maternal and neonatal outcome after cesarean section: the impact of anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Among the anesthetic technologies used, regional anesthesia is becoming the most common in cesarean section (CS) deliveries. Aim. This retrospective survey examined the variables taken into account when selecting the anesthetic technique to be used, and how this choice affects the outcome for the mother and the newborn. METHODS: One thousand eight hundred and seventy elective and emergency CS were evaluated for anesthetic technique used, indications, and maternal and neonatal outcome. RESULTS: Of the 611 elective CS (32.6%), 206 (33.8%) were performed under general anesthesia and 405 (66.2%) under regional anesthesia. Of the 1259 emergency CS performed (67.4%), 525 (41.9%) were under general anesthesia and 734 (58.1%) under regional anesthesia. Conditions associated with a newborn 1-minute Apgar score of <7 were general anesthesia and multiple pregnancy (p<0.01); a 5-minute Apgar score of <7 was only associated with multiple pregnancy. The most important factor for very low Apgar scores was the presence of fetal malformations. Whatever the chosen technique, neither maternal deaths directly or indirectly due to the anesthesia nor major maternal and perinatal complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: This survey confirms the preference for regional anesthesia during elective cesarean sections and for general anesthesia in emergency situations. Moreover, newborn outcome was found not to be influenced either by the technique used or by the character of the procedure.     

Maternal and neonatal copeptin levels at cesarean section and vaginal delivery

Objective

The objective of the study was to measure the copeptin levels in maternal serum and umbilical cord serum at cesarean section and vaginal delivery in normotensive pregnancy and pre-eclamptic women.

Study design

This was a prospective study at Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt. Ninety cases were included. They were divided into six groups: (1) normal pregnancy near term, as a control group, (2) primiparas who had vaginal delivery, (3) primiparas who had vaginal delivery and mild preeclampsia, (4) elective repeat cesarean section, (5) intrapartum cesarean section for indications other than fetal distress, and (6) intrapartum cesarean section for fetal distress. Serum copeptin concentrations were quantified with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Mean, standard deviation, and paired t-test were used to test for significant change in quantitative data.

Results

The vaginal delivery groups had higher levels of maternal serum copeptin than the elective cesarean section group (P < 0.01). Higher maternal serum copeptin levels were found in cases with pre-eclampsia as compared with the normotensive cases. The maternal copeptin levels during intrapartum cesarean section were higher than that during elective repeat cesarean section. There was a significant correlation between maternal copeptin levels and the duration of the first stage. In the presence of fetal distress, umbilical cord serum copeptin levels were significantly higher than other groups.

Conclusion

Vaginal delivery can be very painful and stressful, and is accompanied by a marked increase of maternal serum copeptin. Increased maternal levels of serum copeptin were found in cases with pre-eclampsia as compared with the normotensive cases, and it may be helpful in assessing the disease. Intrauterine fetal distress is a strong stimulus to the release of copeptin into the fetal circulation.     

Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse.

OBJECTIVE: To undertake a five year follow up of a cohort of women and children delivered by forceps or vacuum extractor in a randomised controlled study. DESIGN: Follow up of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: District general hospital in the West Midlands. POPULATION: Follow up questionnaires were sent to 306 of the 313 women originally recruited at the North Staffordshire Hospital to a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and vacuum extractor for assisted delivery. Two hundred and twenty-eight women responded (74.5%) and all were included in the study; forceps (n = 115) and vacuum extractor (n = 113). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bowel and urinary dysfunction, child vision assessment, and child development. RESULTS: Maternal adverse symptoms at long term follow up were relatively common. Urinary incontinence of various severity was reported by 47%, bowel habit urgency was reported by 44% (98/225), and loss of bowel control 'sometimes' or 'frequently' by 20% of women (46/226). No significant differences between instruments were found in terms of either bowel or urinary dysfunction. Overall, 13% (20/158) of children were noted to have visual problems. There was no significant difference in visual function between the two groups: ventouse 11/86 (12.8%), compared with forceps 9/72 (12.5%); odds ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.38-2.50. Of the 20 children with visual problems, a family history was known in 18, and 17/18 (94%) had a positive family history for visual problems. No significant differences in child development were found between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to suggest that at five years after delivery use of the ventouse or forceps has specific maternal or child benefits or side effects.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: Weight-based outcomes

OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to compare infectious morbidity and trial of labor (TOL) success stratified by weight in women. STUDY DESIGN: Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) candidates were divided into groups based on prepregnancy weight: group I, 70 (<200 pounds); group II, 70 (200-300 pounds); and group III, 69 (>300 pounds). RESULTS: The TOL success rate was 81.8% in group I compared with 57.1% in group II and 13.3% in group III (P =.001). The overall infectious morbidity was significantly greater in the obese women 39% (P =.001) compared with the average women at 11.4% and the lean women at 5.7%. CONCLUSION: Infectious morbidity is increased and VBAC success is reduced in patients who weigh more than 300 pounds.     

Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse

Objective To undertake a five year follow up of a cohort of women and children delivered by forceps or vacuum extractor in a randomised controlled study.
Design Follow up of a randomised controlled trial.
Setting District general hospital in the West Midlands.
Population Follow up questionnaires were sent to 306 of the 313 women originally recruited at the North Staffordshire Hospital to a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and vacuum extractor for assisted delivery. Two hundred and twenty-eight women responded (74.5%) and all were included in the study; forceps (   n = 115  ) and vacuum extractor (   n = 113  ).
Main outcome measures Bowel and urinary dysfunction, child vision assessment, and child development.
Results Maternal adverse symptoms at long term follow up were relatively common. Urinary incontinence of various severity was reported by 47%, bowel habit urgency was reported by 44% (98/225), and loss of bowel control 'sometimes' or 'frequently' by 20% of women (46/226). No significant differences between instruments were found in terms of either bowel or urinary dysfunction. Overall, 13% (20/158) of children were noted to have visual problems. There was no significant difference in visual function between the two groups: ventouse 11/86 (12.8%), compared with forceps 9/72 (12.5%); odds ratio 0.97,95% CI 0.38–2.50. Of the 20 children with visual problems, a family history was known in 18, and 17/18 (94%) had a positive family history for visual problems. No significant differences in child development were found between the two groups.
Conclusions There is no evidence to suggest that at five years after delivery use of the ventouse or forceps has specific maternal or child benefits or side effects.     

Trial of labor after cesarean section in twin pregnancies: Maternal and neonatal safety

Objective.?To assess maternal and perinatal morbidity in patients undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) in twin gestations.

Methods.?A retrospective study including all twin pregnancies with a single prior cesarean section was performed. Stratified analysis using a multiple logistic regression model was performed to control for confounders. Patients who had a clear medical indication for a cesarean section (i.e. previous corporeal cesarean section, breech or transverse presentation, placenta previa, placental abruption, and herpes infection) were excluded from the analysis.

Results.?During the years 1988–2007, 134 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 25 patients underwent a trial of labor and the remaining 109 underwent a repeat cesarean delivery. There were no cases of uterine rupture, maternal mortality, or peripartum fever in our population. Higher rates of perinatal mortality were noted in patients undergoing a trial of labor (8% vs. 1.8%, p?=?0.042, OR?=?4.652, 95% CI?=?1.122–19.286). However, a trial of labor was not found to be an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality after controlling for confounders such as gestational age, ethnicity, and fetal malformations (adjusted OR?=?1.07, 95% CI?=?0.07–15.95, p?=?0.95).

Conclusions.?A TOLAC is not associated with an increased risk for maternal morbidity, including uterine rupture. Nevertheless, in our population TOLAC was noted as a risk factor for perinatal mortality, although residual confounding cannot be excluded. Further prospective randomized studies should evaluate the safety of TOLAC in twin gestations to establish appropriate guidelines.     

Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery

Background:  The use of Kjelland's forceps is now uncommon, and published maternal and neonatal outcome data are from deliveries conducted more than a decade ago. The role of Kjelland's rotational delivery in the 'modern era' of high caesarean section rates is unclear.
Aims:  To compare the results of attempted Kjelland's forceps rotational delivery with other methods of instrumental delivery in a tertiary hospital.
Methods:  Retrospective review of all instrumental deliveries for singleton pregnancies 34 or more weeks gestation in a four-year birth cohort, with reference to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Results:  The outcomes of 1067 attempted instrumental deliveries were analysed. Kjelland's forceps were successful in 95% of attempts. Kjelland's forceps deliveries had a rate of adverse maternal outcomes indistinguishable from non-rotational ventouse, and lower than all other forms of instrumental delivery. Kjelland's forceps also had a lower rate of adverse neonatal outcomes than all other forms of instrumental delivery.
Conclusions:  Prudent use of Kjelland's forceps by experienced operators is associated with a very low rate of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Training in this important obstetric skill should be reconsidered urgently, before it is lost forever.     

Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in cesarean section

Maternal mortality rates after cesarean delivery are low, but cesarean section is more hazardous than vaginal delivery by a factor of two to four. Operative complications can be minimized by careful technique and are more often seen in emergency than elective cases. Prophylactic antibiotics are of some benefit in reducing postoperative endometritis in patients with risk factors. Cesarean birth rarely causes the death of a newborn. Nevertheless, significant newborn pulmonary problems, especially respiratory distress syndrome, may follow an inappropriately timed cesarean delivery. Careful attention to clinical measures and supporting evidence of pulmonary maturity from ultrasound will avoid most instances of iatrogenic prematurity. Amniocentesis, with a higher complication rate than ultrasound, may still be required to prove pulmonary maturity in some circumstances. If concern or doubt precludes elective delivery of patients with previous low transverse uterine incisions, one can wait for the patient to go into spontaneous labor.     

Vaginal delivery after cesarean section

We retrospectively analyzed 194 pregnancies in women with a history of previous cesarean section (CS) who were offered a trial of labor. We offered every woman a trial of labor as long as she did not have a known previous classical scar. One hundred fifty-one women delivered vaginally (79%), 24 women had multiple uterine scars. Multiple gestations and breech presentation were not considered a sole indication to perform CS. Fetal and maternal morbidity are presented. We conclude that women with multiple previous CS scars can safely deliver vaginally as can women with unknown uterine scars, with careful intrapartum surveillance. Although our numbers of women with breech presentation and multiple gestations are small, in the absence of significant morbidity, we continue to allow these women to labor and deliver vaginally.     

Maternal febrile morbidity after cesarean section

The frequency of puerperal febrile complications is considerably higher following cesarean section than after vaginal delivery. In a retrospective investigation of 234 planned operations and 506 emergency operations, a significantly different frequency of febrile morbidity (FM) was found following the two types of operation (7.7% vs. 20.9%). The development of FM following emergency operation was investigated in relation to factors such as age, parity, repeat cesarean section, surgeon's experience, peroperative bleeding, rupture of membranes, frequency of vaginal exploration, gestational weeks, pre- and postoperative anemia. We found some predisposing factors to FM and of these five, each was significant, but a multiple regression analysis showed that only rupture of the membranes, and pre- and postoperative anemia have an independent significant explanatory value (p less than 0.01).     

Mode of delivery after one cesarean section.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate labor patterns and mode of delivery of aginal births after cesarean (VBAC) versus unsuccessful trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) in a South African district hospital, and the influence of the indication for the primary cesarean section (C-section) on the subsequent mode of delivery. METHODS: Retrospective audit of the partogram of 202 VBAC and 382 repeat C-section. There were 108 elective repeat cesarean deliveries (ERCD) and 274 emergency repeat C-sections after unsuccessful TOLAC. The indication of the primary C-section was known in 127: 43 (33.9%) VBAC and 84 (66.1%) repeat C-sections. RESULTS: The indication for the primary C-section in terms of recurrent/non-recurrent did not affect the subsequent mode of delivery (chi(2)=3.5; P=0.06; OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.23-1.04). The indication of the primary C-section in terms of dysfunctional/non-dysfunctional labor did not reoccur in the same parturients (chi(2)=0.01; P=0.91; OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.35-2.55). CONCLUSION: Dysfunctional labor accounted for most primary and repeat emergency C-sections, but not as a recurrent condition in the same parturients.     

Neonatal outcome after cesarean section

Cesarean section is the most commonly performed procedure all over the world. Both American and European data reveal constant and steady increase of pregnancies resolved by a cesarean section. The reasons include: growing number of medical indications or requests of the pregnant women. Regardless of the fact that elective cesarean section decreases the risk of intrauterine hypoxia, meconium aspiration and injury during labor it remains a significant risk factor for respiratory failure in the course of transient tachypnea of the newborn, infant respiratory distress syndrome and pulmonary hypertension, both for term and late preterm infants. As a consequence, the infant requires a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit, together with advanced and often expensive medical procedures such as mechanical (often high-frequency) ventilation, nitric oxide therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the European Association of Perinatal Medicine recommend for a cesarean section due to medical indications to be performed after 39 weeks gestation, preferably after uterine contractions started, and elective cesarean section, particularly if there are indications to finish the pregnancy before 39 weeks gestation, after lung maturity has been assessed (in other case steroids ought to be administered prenatally to mature the lung muscles). That includes also cases of elective cesarean sections performed due to previous cesarean sections, which are the most frequent reasons for repeating procedure. The recommendations also restrict the indications for cesarean section in case of significant prematurity what in turn is connected with more restricted indications for resuscitation of extremely premature infants and babies with extremely low birth weight.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity to elective repeat cesarean section

A retrospective study of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) was conducted over 24 months. Of 152 women who had a previous cesarean, 141 were offered VBAC. Sixty-eight had an elective repeat cesarean, and 73 agreed to VBAC. These groups were similar with respect to age, race, parity, and weight. Fifty-nine of the VBAC patients delivered vaginally (80.8%). The two groups were compared for the incidence of febrile morbidity, endomyometritis, uterine dehiscence and estimated blood loss at delivery. There were no significant differences between the two groups or when each was compared with a control group of 69 routine vaginal deliveries except for the estimated blood loss and the number of days hospitalized (p less than 0.05). Neonatal morbidity was examined between the two groups by comparing the incidence of transient tachypnea and the number of newborns with suspected sepsis, as well as those requiring antibiotics or admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. The repeat cesarean group had a higher overall incidence of neonatal morbidity than the VBAC group, but this was not statistically significant. However, there was statistical significance (p less than 0.05) when comparing the number of days hospitalized between the infants in the VBAC group versus the repeat cesarean group. This study supports VBAC as a safe alternative to elective repeat cesarean for the patient and neonate. Data analysis was performed using Student's t test or chi-square analysis with a p less than 0.05 regarded as being statistically significant.     

A double-blind, randomized comparison of moxalactam versus clindamycin-gentamicin in treatment of endomyometritis after cesarean section delivery

A double-blind comparison of clindamycin plus gentamicin versus moxalactam plus placebo was performed for the treatment of endomyometritis after cesarean section delivery. Entry criteria were uterine tenderness, temperature greater than or equal to 101 degrees F, and leukocytosis. Uterine specimens were obtained for culture via a single-lumen transcervical catheter. Bacteremia occurred in 10% of patients. Among the 57 patients treated with clindamycin plus gentamicin, there were two clinical failures and four side effect failures (diarrhea in two, allergic reaction in two). Among the 56 patients in the moxalactam group, there were four clinical failures and one side effect failure (diarrhea). Both regimens had good cure rates, with no significant differences in cures or postoperative hospital stay.