Lipoprotein (a) levels and apolipoprotein (a) isoform size in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism: effect of treatment with levothyroxine.

The increased risk for ischemic heart disease (IHD) associated with subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) has been partly attributed to dyslipidemia. There is limited information on the effect of SH on lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], which is considered a significant predictor of IHD. Serum Lp(a) levels are predominantly regulated by apolipoprotein [apo(a)] gene polymorphisms. The aim of our study was to evaluate the Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes in patients with SH compared to healthy controls as well as the influence of levothyroxine substitution therapy on Lp(a) values in relation to the apo(a) isoform size. Lp(a) levels were measured in 69 patients with SH before and after restoration of a euthyroid state and in 83 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Apo(a) isoform size was determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) agarose gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblotting and development via chemiluminescence. Patients with SH exhibited increased Lp(a) levels compared to controls (median value 10.6 mg/dL vs. 6.0 mg/dL, p = 0.003]), but this was not because of differences in the frequencies of apo(a) phenotypes. There was no association between thyrotropin (TSH) and Lp(a) levels in patients with SH. In subjects with either low (LMW; 25 patients and 28 controls) or high (HMW; 44 patients and 55 controls) molecular weight apo(a) isoforms, Lp(a) concentrations were higher in patients than in the control group (median values 26.9 mg/dL vs. 21.8 mg/dL, p = 0.02 for LMW, and 6.0 mg/dL versus 3.3 mg/dL, p < 0.001 for HMW). Levothyroxine treatment resulted in an overall reduction of Lp(a) levels (10.6 mg/dL baseline vs. 8.9 mg/dL posttreatment, p = 0.008]). This effect was mainly evident in patients with LMW apo(a) isoforms associated with high baseline Lp(a) concentrations (median values 26.9 mg/dL vs. 23.2 mg/dL pretreatment and posttreatment, respectively; p = 0.03). In conclusion, even though a causal effect of thyroid dysfunction on Lp(a) was not clearly demonstrated in patients with SH, levothyroxine treatment is beneficial, especially in patients with increased baseline Lp(a) levels and LMW apo(a) isoforms.     

Quantification of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) in plasma and lipoprotein fractions in the hypertriglyceridemic state.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) in particular in association with high low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations. Hypertriglyceridemia on the other hand has been found to be associated with low Lp(a) values. This observation could be confirmed in 851 patients of the outpatient lipid clinic. Lp(a) median levels were 2.7-fold higher in patients with triglycerides below 200 mg/dl as compared with patients expressing triglyceride levels above 200 mg/dl (19 vs 7 mg/dl, P < 0.0001). In contrast to these data apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] has been detected in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL). To find out whether the presence of apo(a) in TRL is determined by the concentration of these particles, apo(a) concentrations were measured in TRL in fasting plasma of ten hypertriglyceridemic patients and ten normal controls with Lp(a) serum levels above 25 mg/dl. The apo(a) concentration in TRL did not show statistically significant differences between controls and patients (2.0+/-0.9 vs 1.8+/-1.6 mg/dl). In the second part of the study apo(a) levels in TRL were measured before and after fat feeding in eight healthy volunteers. Again no significant differences were observed in the apo(a) concentrations of the d < 1.006 a ml fraction before and after fat feeding (1.03+/-1.06 vs 0.81+/-0.63 mg/dl). In summary, this study fails to show an association of apo(a) with TRL for different states of hypertriglyceridemia. This negative finding is shown for constant particle numbers but might not be true if the particle number in TRL increases.     

Contribution of apolipoprotein(a) size, pentanucleotide TTTTA repeat and C/T(+93) polymorphisms of the apo(a) gene to regulation of lipoprotein(a) plasma levels in a population of young European Caucasians.

Several studies indicate that the inter-individual variation in plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is mainly under genetic control. To define the effect of three DNA polymorphisms on apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) expression, we have determined plasma Lp(a) concentrations, apo(a) isoform size, KpnI allele size, the TTTTA pentanucleotide repeat number in the 5' control region of the apo(a) gene and the +93 C/T polymorphism in a European Caucasian population. The simultaneous determination of the kringle 4 (K4) number by genotyping and by phenotyping revealed that the size distribution of non-expressed apo(a) alleles was markedly skewed towards alleles with greater than 25 K4 repeats. This is consistent with the inverse relationship frequently described between the kringle 4 number and the plasma Lp(a) level. Apportioning the Lp(a) concentration from the surface of the peaks on apo(a) phenotyping blots, we have observed that the Lp(a) plasma concentration associated with alleles having more than 25 K4 units does not exceed 400 mg/l, whereas the range of Lp(a) concentrations associated with smaller alleles was broad, from 0 to more than 1000 mg/l. It can thus be concluded that the number of K4 repeats is the main determinant of Lp(a) concentration when this number is more than 25, whereas other polymorphisms may be involved in the alleles with fewer than 26 K4. Analyses of the TTTTA repeat number and of the +93 C/T polymorphism were performed in subjects with KpnI alleles of the same length: low Lp(a) concentrations were shown to be preferentially associated with the presence of apo(a) alleles with more than eight pentanucleotide repeats while no association was revealed between Lp(a) plasma levels and the C/T polymorphism. These results demonstrate that the (TTTTA)(n) polymorphism affects the Lp(a) expression independently of apo(a) size polymorphism.     

Association of lipoprotein(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes with coronary artery disease in Type 2 diabetic patients and in non-diabetic subjects.

AIMS: We investigated whether in Type 2 diabetic patients lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels and apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) polymorphism are associated with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CAD). We also examined whether there are differences in the distributions of Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes between CAD patients with and without diabetes. METHODS: A hundred and seven diabetic patients with CAD, 274 diabetic patients without CAD, 201 non-diabetic patients with CAD, and 358 controls were enrolled. RESULTS: Diabetic patients with CAD showed Lp(a) levels (21.2 +/- 17.7 vs. 15.1 +/- 17.8 mg/dl; P = 0.0018) and a percentage of subjects with at least one apo(a) isoform of low molecular weight (MW) (67.2% vs. 27.7%; P = 0.0000) significantly greater than diabetic patients without CAD. Multivariate analysis showed that in diabetic patients Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes were significantly associated with CAD; odds ratios (ORs) of high Lp(a) levels for CAD were 2.17 (1.28-3.66), while ORs of the presence of at least one apo(a) isoform of low MW were 5.35 (3.30-8.60). Lp(a) levels (30.2 +/- 23.7 vs. 21.2 +/- 17.7 mg/dl; P = 0.0005) and the percentage of subjects with at least one apo(a) isoform of low MW (87.0% vs. 67.2%; P = 0.0001) were significantly higher in CAD patients without than in those with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes are independently associated with CAD in Type 2 diabetic patients; thus both these parameters may be helpful in selecting diabetic subjects at high genetic cardiovascular risk. However, Lp(a) levels and apo(a) polymorphism seem to be cardiovascular risk factors less important in diabetic than in non-diabetic subjects. Diabet. Med. 18, 589-594 (2001)     

Lack of association between genetic variations of apo A-I-C-III-A-IV gene cluster and myocardial infarction in a sample of European male: ECTIM study.

The goal of the present study was to compare the allele frequency of four polymorphisms at the apo A-I C-III A-IV cluster gene locus-ApoA-I: XmnI and PstI; ApoC-III: SstI; ApoA-IV: XbaI-between male patients who had had a myocardial infarction (n= 614) and matched controls (n = 764). The association with a number of lipid lipoprotein, apolipoprotein and lipoprotein particle variables was also assessed. Patients and subjects were recruited in Belfast, Lille, Strasbourg and Toulouse in the framework of the ECTIM study. In the control group, the frequencies of the different polymorphic alleles were homogeneous among recruitment centres suggesting the absence of any European North to South gradient for these cluster polymorphisms. There was no evidence for a significant difference in allelic distribution between cases and controls suggesting that apo A-I, C-III, A-IV gene cluster polymorphisms do not explain MI survival in this sample of European men. There was no statistically significant association between apo A-I C-III A-IV cluster gene polymorphisms and lipid, lipoprotein, apolipoprotein, and lipoprotein particle levels. In conclusion, in the ECTIM study, the apo A-I, C-III, A-IV gene cluster polymorphism is associated with neither circulating plasma variables nor MI survival.     

Lipoprotein(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism in type 1 diabetes mellitus: relationships to microvascular and neurological complications

To investigate plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] polymorphism in relation to the presence of microvascular and neurological complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus, 118 young diabetic patients and 127 age-matched controls were recruited. Lp(a) levels were higher in patients than in controls, but the apo(a) isoforms distribution did not differ between the two groups [higher prevalence of isoforms of high relative molecular mass (RMM) in both groups]. Microalbuminuric patients had Lp(a) levels significantly greater than normoalbuminuric patients, and normoalbuminuric patients showed higher Lp(a) levels than controls. Patients with retinopathy or neuropathy showed similar Lp(a) levels to those without retinopathy or neuropathy. No differences in apo(a) isoforms frequencies were observed between subgroups with and without complications (higher prevalence of isoforms of high RMM in every subgroup). However, among patients with retinopathy, those with proliferative retinopathy had higher Lp(a) levels and a different apo(a) isoforms distribution (higher prevalence of isoforms of low RMM) than those with non-proliferative and background retinopathy (higher prevalence of isoforms of high RMM). Our data suggest that young type 1 diabetic patients without microalbuminuria have Lp(a) levels higher than healthy subjects of the same age. Lp(a) levels are further increased in microalbuminuric patients. High Lp(a) levels and apo(a) isoforms of low RMM seem to be associated with the presence of proliferative retinopathy, but have no relation to neuropathy. Received: 23 June 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 27 November 1997     

Serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) isoforms: association with the severity of clinical presentation in patients with coronary heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the possible associations between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations or apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and the mode of clinical presentation of coronary heart disease (CHD) (acute thrombotic event or not). METHODS: A total of 131 CHD patients and 71 age- and gender-matched individuals without known CAD (free of symptoms of heart disease) were enrolled in the study. CHD patients were classified into patients with a history of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS, n=94) and patients with stable angina (SA, n=37). Lp(a) levels were measured with an ELISA method, whereas apolipoprotein(a) isoform analysis was performed (in all patients and 33 controls) by electrophoresis in 1.5% SDS-agarose gels followed by immunoblotting. Isoform size was expressed as the number of kringle 4 (K4) repeats. RESULTS: ACS patients had higher Lp(a) plasma levels 121.9 (0.8-84.1) mg/dl] and a greater proportion of elevated (> or = 30 mg/dl) Lp(a) concentrations (25.5%) compared with SA patients [9.2 (0.8-50.5) mg/dl, P < 0.01 and 10.8%, P < 0.05] and controls [8.0 (0.8-55.0) mg/dl, P < 0.01 and 11.2%, P < 0.05], while there were no differences between SA patients and controls. The median apolipoprotein(a)-isoform size was 26 K4. In 17 (10%) patients we could not detect any apolipoprotein(a) isoform bands by immunoblotting. ACS patients had a higher proportion of isoforms < 26 K4 (low molecular weight) than SA patients (56/85 vs. 12/33, P < 0.005) and controls (10/29, P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: CAD patients with a history of ACS have higher Lp(a) plasma levels and a significantly higher proportion of low molecular weight apolipoprotein(a) isoforms compared with patients with SA or to controls.     

LPA gene: interaction between the apolipoprotein(a) size ('kringle IV' repeat) polymorphism and a pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism influences Lp(a) lipoprotein level

OBJECTIVES: In order to search for factors influencing the Lp(a) lipoprotein level, we have examined the apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) size polymorphism as well as a pentanucleotide (TTTTA) repeat polymorphism in the 5' control region of the LPA gene. DESIGN: Lp(a) lipoprotein levels were compared between individuals with different genotypes as defined by pulsed field gel electrophoresis of DNA plugs, and PCR of DNA samples followed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. DNA plugs and DNA were prepared from blood samples collected from blood donors. RESULTS: Twenty-seven different K IV repeat alleles were observed in the 71 women and 92 men from which apo(a) size polymorphism results were obtained. Alleles encoding 26-32 Kringle IV repeats were the most frequent. Alleles encoding seven to 11 TTTTA repeats were detected in the 84 women and 122 men included in the pentanucleotide polymorphism study, and homozygosity for eight TTTTA repeats was the most common genotype. The eight TTTTA repeat allele occurred with almost any apo(a) allele. An inverse relationship between number of K IV repeats and Lp(a) concentration was confirmed. The contributions of the apo(a) size polymorphism and the pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism to the interindividual variance of Lp(a) lipoprotein concentrations were 9.7 and 3.5%, respectively (type IV sum of squares). Nineteen per cent of the variance in Lp(a) lipoprotein level appeared to be the result of the multiplication product (interaction) between the apo(a) size polymorphism and the pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism. CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of the apo(a) size polymorphism alone to the variation in Lp(a) lipoprotein level was lower than previously reported. However, the multiplicative interaction effect between the K IV repeat polymorphism and the pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism may be an important factor explaining the variation in Lp(a) lipoprotein levels among the populations.     

Associations among serum lipoprotein(a) levels, apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes, and myocardial infarction in patients with extremely low and high levels of serum lipoprotein(a).

A high serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level, which is genetically determined by apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] size polymorphism, is an independent risk factor for coronary atherosclerosis. However, the associations among Lp(a) levels, apo(a) phenotypes, and myocardial infarction (MI) have not been studied. Patients with MI (cases, n = 101, M/F: 86/15, age: 62+/-10y) and control subjects (n = 92, M/F: 53/39, age: 58+/-14y) were classified into quintile groups (Groups I to V) according to Lp(a) levels. Apo(a) isoform phenotyping was performed by a sensitive, high-resolution technique using sodium dodecyl sulfate-agarose/gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (3-6%), which identified 26 different apo(a) phenotypes, including a null type. Groups with higher Lp(a) levels (Groups II, III, and V) had higher percentages of MI patients than that with the lowest Lp(a) levels (Group I) (54%, 56%, or 75% vs. 32%, p<0.05). Groups with different Lp(a) levels had different frequency distributions of apo(a) isoprotein phenotypes: Groups II, III, IV, and V, which had increasing Lp(a) levels, had increasingly higher percentages of smaller isoforms (A1-A4, A5-A9) and decreasingly lower percentages of large isoforms (A10-A20, A21-A25) compared to Group I. An apparent inverse relationship existed between Lp(a) and the apo(a) phenotype. Subjects with the highest Lp(a) levels (Group V) had significantly (p<0.05) higher serum levels of total cholesterol, apo B, and Lp(a). Patients with MI and the controls had different distributions of apo(a) phenotypes: i.e., more small isoforms and more large size isoforms, respectively (A1-A4/A5-A9/A10-A20/A21-A25: 35.7%/27.7%/20.8%/15.8% and 22.8%/23.9%/29.4%/23.9%, respectively). Lp(a) (parameter estimate +/- standard error: 0.70+/-0.20, Wald chi2 = 12.4, p = 0.0004), apo(a) phenotype (-0.43+/-0.15, Wald chi2 = 8.17, p = 0.004), High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, apo A-I, and apo B were significantly associated with MI after adjusting for age, gender, and conventional risk factors, as assessed by a univariate logistic regression analysis. The association between Lp(a) and MI was independent of the apo(a) phenotype, but the association between the apo(a) phenotype and MI was not independent of Lp(a), as assessed by a multivariate logistic regression analysis. This association was not influenced by other MI- or Lp(a)-related lipid variables. These results suggest that apo(a) phenotype contributes to, but does not completely explain, the increased Lp(a) levels in MI. A stepwise logistic regression analysis with and without Lp(a) in the model identified Lp(a) and the apo(a) phenotype as significant predictors for MI, respectively.     

High levels of Lp(a) with a small apo(a) isoform are associated with coronary artery disease in African American and white men

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and the presence of small isoforms of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] have been associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) in whites but not in African Americans. Because of marked race/ethnicity differences in the distribution of Lp(a) levels across apo(a) sizes, we tested the hypothesis that apo(a) isoform size determines the association between Lp(a) and CAD. We related Lp(a) levels, apo(a) isoforms, and the levels of Lp(a) associated with different apo(a) isoforms to the presence of CAD (>/=50% stenosis) in 576 white and African American men and women. Only in white men were Lp(a) levels significantly higher among patients with CAD than in those without CAD (28.4 versus 16.5 mg/dL, respectively; P:=0.004), and only in this group was the presence of small apo(a) isoforms (<22 kringle 4 repeats) associated with CAD (P:=0.043). Elevated Lp(a) levels (>/=30 mg/dL) were found in 26% of whites and 68% of African Americans, and of those, 80% of whites but only 26% of African Americans had a small apo(a) isoform. Elevated Lp(a) levels with small apo(a) isoforms were significantly associated with CAD (P:<0.01) in African American and white men but not in women. This association remained significant after adjusting for age, diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypertension, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. We conclude that elevated levels of Lp(a) with small apo(a) isoforms independently predict risk for CAD in African American and white men. Our study, by determining the predictive power of Lp(a) levels combined with apo(a) isoform size, provides an explanation for the apparent lack of association of either measure alone with CAD in African Americans. Furthermore, our results suggest that small apo(a) size confers atherogenicity to Lp(a).     

Serum lipoprotein(a) concentration and Apo(a) isoform under the condition of renal dysfunction

A serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent risk factor for cardiac events. It is well known that the patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) have a high concentration of serum Lp(a). The purpose of this study was to indicate the relationship between serum Lp(a) concentration and apoprotein(a) (apo(a)) isoforms under the condition of renal dysfunction. One-hundred thirty patients having hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus and/or CRF were selected in this study. All patients were divided into two groups according to the level of serum creatinine. Serum Lp(a) concentration in the CRF patients (Cr > 2.0 mg/dl) was significantly higher than that in the controls (Cr < 1.2 mg/dl). Many CRF patients had high molecular weight (HMW)-apo(a). This study showed that the increase in HMW-apo(a) was closely accompanied by the increase in serum creatinine levels, and the serum Lp(a) concentration with HMW-apo(a) was higher according to their creatinine levels.     

Lipoprotein(a): an elusive cardiovascular risk factor

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], is present only in humans, Old World nonhuman primates, and the European hedgehog. Lp(a) has many properties in common with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) but contains a unique protein, apo(a), which is structurally different from other apolipoproteins. The size of the apo(a) gene is highly variable, resulting in the protein molecular weight ranging from 300 to 800 kDa; this large variation may be caused by neutral evolution in the absence of any selection advantage. Apo(a) influences to a major extent metabolic and physicochemical properties of Lp(a), and the size polymorphism of the apo(a) gene contributes to the pronounced heterogeneity of Lp(a). There is an inverse relationship between apo(a) size and Lp(a) levels; however, this pattern is complex. For a given apo(a) size, there is a considerable variation in Lp(a) levels across individuals, underscoring the importance to assess allele-specific Lp(a) levels. Further, Lp(a) levels differ between populations, and blacks have generally higher levels than Asians and whites, adjusting for apo(a) sizes. In addition to the apo(a) size polymorphism, an upstream pentanucleotide repeat (TTTTA(n)) affects Lp(a) levels. Several meta-analyses have provided support for an association between Lp(a) and coronary artery disease, and the levels of Lp(a) carried in particles with smaller size apo(a) isoforms are associated with cardiovascular disease or with preclinical vascular changes. Further, there is an interaction between Lp(a) and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The physiological role of Lp(a) is unknown, although a majority of studies implicate Lp(a) as a risk factor.     

Different apoprotein(a) isoform proportions in serum and carotid plaque

INTRODUCTION: Cardio- and/or cerebro-vascular risk are associated with high lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels and low-molecular-weight (LMW) apo(a) isoforms. Aims of this study were to evaluate the deposition of apo(a) isoforms and apoprotein B (apo B) in atherosclerotic plaque from patients (males and females) who had carotid endarterectomy for severe stenosis, and to identify differences between patients classified by gender and divided according to the stability or instability of their plaques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined lipids, apo B and Lp(a) in serum and plaque extracts from 55 males and 25 females. Apo(a) was phenotyped and isoforms were classified by number of kringle IV (KIV) repeats. RESULTS: Lp(a) levels were higher in female serum and plaque extracts than in male samples, while apo B levels were lower. More Lp(a) than apo B deposition was observed in plaque after normalization for serum levels. Thirty-one different apo(a) isoforms were detected in our patients, with a double band phenotype in 94% of cases. In both sexes, the low/high (L/H) molecular weight apo(a) isoform expression ratio was significantly higher in plaque than in serum. Females with unstable plaques had higher Lp(a) levels in both serum and tissue extracts, and fewer KIV repeats of the principal apo(a) isoform in the serum than the other female group or males. CONCLUSIONS: In both sexes, the same apo(a) isoforms are found in serum and atherosclerotic plaque, but in different proportions: in plaque, LMW apo(a) is almost always more strongly accumulated than HMW apo(a), irrespective of any combination of apo(a) isoforms in double band phenotypes or Lp(a) serum levels. Moreover, serum and tissue Lp(a) levels were higher in females than in males, and particularly in the group with unstable plaques.     

Lipoprotein Lp(a) in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: density profile, particle heterogeneity and apolipoprotein(a) phenotype.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder featuring a functional defect in cellular LDL receptors, marked elevation in circulating LDL concentrations, and premature atherosclerosis. The potential atherogenic role of apo B-containing lipoproteins other than LDL in this disease is indeterminate. We describe the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Lp(a) as a function of apo(a) phenotype in a group of eight, unrelated homozygous FH patients. Plasma Lp(a) levels were significantly elevated (2.5-fold; mean 50 +/- 32 mg/dl) as compared to those in healthy subjects. The S2 isoform of apo(a) occurred most frequently (6 of eight patients); the rare B isoform presented in three patients. Plasma Lp(a) levels in homozygous FH did not correspond to those predicted by apo(a) phenotype. Analyses of the density distribution of Lp(a) and of Lp(a) particle size and heterogeneity as a function of density did not reveal any anomalies characteristic of homozygous FH. However, comparison of the hydrated density of Lp(a) particles as a function of apo(a) isoform content revealed a clear influence of isoform on this parameter; thus, in a B/S2 heterozygous patient, the density distribution of Lp(a) fractions containing isoform B alone, B and S2, and S2 alone, demonstrated that the apparent molecular weight of apo(a) plays a determining role in controlling the hydrated density and size of the resulting Lp(a) particle. Indeed, patients expressing the high molecular weight, S2 isoform uniformly displayed a dense form of Lp(a) (hydrated density approximately 1.055 g/ml). In subjects presenting two apo(a) isoforms, each isoform resided on distinct lipoprotein particles; in such cases, the plasma levels of the denser isoform predominated, suggesting differences in rates of formation, or rates of tissular catabolism, or in the plasma stability of the particles, or a combination of these mechanisms. Considered together, our data may be interpreted to suggest that the elevated circulating levels of Lp(a) in homozygous FH patients may reflect either an increased biosynthesis, or diminished catabolism via the cellular LDL receptor pathway, or a combination of both.     

Postprandial lipoprotein(a) response to a single meal containing either saturated or omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in subjects with hypoalphalipoproteinemia.

We have recently reported that the apolipoprotein (apo) B-100-apo(a) complex, the protein moiety of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], has a high affinity for triglyceride(TG)-rich particles (TRP) and that this complex can affiliate with endogenous TG-rich lipoproteins. To shed more light on the apo B-100-apo(a) complex associated with plasma TRP during postprandial lipidemia, we fed five male subjects presenting with primary hypoalphalipoproteinemia (HP) and four male controls a single fat meal (60 g/m2) containing saturated fatty acids (SFA) and, 6 weeks later, an isocaloric meal containing omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. The subjects were phenotyped for plasma Lp(a) and apo C-III levels, apo(a) and apo E isoforms, and lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase activities. Vitamin A was included in the meal as a marker of intestinally derived TRP. Following the SFA meal, three of the HP subjects showed a decrease in plasma levels of Lp(a) that lasted 10 to 12 hours in the presence of an increased hypertriglyceridemic response. Two HP subjects who had low preprandial lipoprotein lipase activity and elevated plasma apo C-III levels showed an increase in plasma Lp(a) levels along with the hypertriglyceridemic excursion. However, in all cases, inclusive of the controls, there was an elevation in plasma levels of TRP of Sf greater than 1,000 that contained apo B-100-apo(a) 6 to 8 hours after the meal. This TRP excursion appeared not to be related to the basal levels of plasma Lp(a), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, TGs, or apo(a) and apo E isoforms, and it did not coincide with the retinyl ester peak.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphism is associated with coronary heart disease in polygenic hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In addition to high serum cholesterol levels, various cardiovascular risk factors may be involved in the development of coronary heart disease (CHD) in hypercholesterolemic subjects. As the levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], an important and independent cardiovascular risk factor, are high in polygenic hypercholesterolemia (PH), we investigated plasma Lp(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes in relation to occurrence of CHD events in PH patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Lp(a) levels and apo(a) isoforms were determined in 191 PH patients, 83 normocholesterolemic subjects with CHD, and 94 normocholesterolemic controls without CHD. Lp(a) levels were similar in the hypercholesterolemic subjects with (n=100) or without CHD (n=91): 21.4 (range 6.6-59.23) vs 18.5 (range 5.25-57.25) mg/dL (p=NS). Low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms were more prevalent (55%) in the PH patients with CHD, whereas high molecular weight apo(a) isoforms were more prevalent (62.6%) in those without CHD: this difference was significant (p<0.05). A stepwise multiple-discriminant analysis made in order to determine the independence of common cardiovascular risk factors, Lp(a) levels and low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms in predicting CHD among hypercholesterolemic subjects showed that the presence of a positive family history of CHD, smoking, age, and the presence of at least one apo(a) isoform of low molecular weight were independently associated with CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high Lp(a) levels, our findings do not support the hypothesis that Lp(a) plays an independent role in determining clinical CHD in PH subjects. However, the presence of at least one low molecular weight apo(a) isoform is an independent genetic predictor of CHD in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Together with other cardiovascular risk factors, apo(a) phenotypes should be assessed to evaluate the overall CHD risk status of all subjects with high serum cholesterol levels.     

High lipoprotein(a) levels and small apolipoprotein(a) sizes are associated with endothelial dysfunction in a multiethnic cohort

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the effect of lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), levels and apolipoprotein(a), or apo(a), sizes on endothelial function and to explore ethnic differences in their effects. BACKGROUND: Although high levels of Lp(a) have been shown to confer increased cardiovascular risk in Caucasians, its significance in non-Caucasian populations is uncertain. The pathogenic role of the apo(a) component of Lp(a) is also unclear. METHODS: The relationship of Lp(a) levels and apo(a) sizes to endothelial function was examined in a multiethnic cohort of 89 healthy subjects (age 42 +/- 9 years; 50 men, 39 women) free of other cardiac risk factors. Endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and endothelium-independent, nitrate-induced dilation (NTG) were assessed by ultrasound imaging of the brachial artery. RESULTS: Plasma Lp(a) levels were lowest in Caucasians (18.3 +/- 21.1 mg/dl, n = 40); intermediate in Hispanics (30.2 +/- 30.5 mg/dl, n = 21); and highest in African Americans (68.8 +/- 46.0 mg/dl, n = 28). Lipoprotein(a) levels were found to correlate inversely to FMD (r = -0.33, p < 0.005) but not to NTG (r = 0.06, p = 0.60). This association remained significant after adjusting for gender (p = 0.002). In addition, subjects with small apo(a) size of 相似文献   

Lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism and restenosis after intracoronary stent placement in Type 2 diabetic patients

The relationship between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and restenosis after intracoronary stent implantation has never been analysed in diabetic patients. The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate whether Lp(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes are predictors of restenosis after elective stent implantation in Type 2 diabetic patients with de novo lesions of coronary arteries. We recruited 102 Type 2 diabetic patients with a new lesion successfully treated with elective placement of one or two Palmaz-Schatz stents. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 months or earlier if clinically indicated. Seven patients were lost to the follow up. Among 95 patients enrolled, restenosis was present in 37 (38.9%) and absent in 58 (61.1%). The restenosis group showed Lp(a) levels higher than the nonrestenosis group (25.1+/-14.4 vs. 21.3+/-14.6 mg/dl), but the difference was not significant. The restenosis group had a percentage of subjects with at least one apo(a) isoform of low molecular weight (MW) significantly greater than the nonrestenosis group (75.7% vs. 55.1%; P<.05). A multiple logistic regression analysis showed that presence of multivessel disease (risk relative [RR]: 5.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-28.15; P<.05) was the only predictor of restenosis after stent placement in diabetic patients. Lp(a) and apo(a) polymorphisms did not enter the model as predictive variables. Our study shows that the presence of multivessel disease is a predictor of restenosis after intracoronary stent implantation in diabetic patients. On the contrary, Lp(a) and apo(a) polymorphisms do not appear to be reliable markers of restenosis in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Lipoprotein (a) levels, apolipoprotein (a) phenotypes and thyroid autoimmunity

It has been reported that euthyroid normolipidemic males and postmenopausal females exhibit significantly higher serum lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) levels compared with age- and sex-matched normolipidemic controls. However, it is well known that there is an inverse correlation between Lp(a) concentration and apolipoprotein (a) (apo(a)) isoform size. Thus, it is imperative to exclude differences in apo(a) isoform frequencies between subjects with or without thyroid autoimmunity in order to verify if there is an association between thyroid autoimmunity and increased Lp(a) concentration. To exclude such an effect of different apo(a) isoform frequencies, we determined apo(a) phenotypes in 22 patients (9 males and 13 postmenopausal females) with thyroid autoimmunity and in 64 (29 males and 35 females) age- and sex-matched individuals without thyroid autoimmunity (control group). There were no significant differences in the values of lipid parameters between the two groups, including Lp(a). We did not detect any significant differences in the apo(a) phenotype frequencies between the two groups. Additionally, in neither of the subgroups formed according to the presence of low molecular vs high molecular weight apo(a) isoforms were there any significant differences in median serum Lp(a) levels between patients with and without thyroid autoimmunity. Thus, our results contradict the previously reported association between thyroid autoimmunity and Lp(a) concentrations.     

Serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in the families of NIDDM patients

Summary We studied the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a function of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype in 87 members (42 males, 45 females) of 20 diabetic families, 26 of whom were diagnosed with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) with moderate glycaemic control (HbA_1c7.1±1.2%). Apo(a) phenotyping was performed by a sensitive, high-resolution technique using SDS-agarose/gradient PAGE (3–6%). To date, 26 different apo(a) phenotypes, including a null type, have been identified. Serum Lp(a) levels of NIDDM patients and non-diabetic members of the same family who had the same apo(a) phenotypes were compared, while case control subjects were chosen from high-Lp(a) non-diabetic and low-Lp(a) non-diabetic groups with the same apo(a) phenotypes in the same family. Serum Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in NIDDM patients than in non-diabetic subjects (39.8±33.3 vs 22.3±19.5 mg/dl, p<0.05). The difference in the mean Lp(a) level between the diabetic and non-diabetic groups was significantly (p<0.05) greater than that between the high-Lp(a) non-diabetic and low-Lp(a) non-diabetic groups. An analysis of covariance and a least square means comparison indicated that the regression line between serum Lp(a) levels [log Lp(a)] and apo(a) phenotypes in the diabetic patient group was significantly (p<0.01) elevated for each apo(a) phenotype, compared to the regression line of the control group. These data, together with our previous findings that serum Lp(a) levels are genetically controlled by apo(a) phenotypes, suggest that Lp(a) levels in diabetic patients are not regulated by smaller apo(a) isoforms, and that serum Lp(a) levels are greater in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic family members, even when they share the same apo(a) phenotypes.Abbreviations Lp(a) Lipoprotein(a) - apo(a) apolipoprotein(a) - NIDDM non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus - TC total cholesterol - LDL low density lipoprotein - TG triglycerides - HDL-C high density lipoprotein-cholesterol - LDL-C low density lipoprotein-cholesterol - PBS phosphate buffered saline The first two authors contributed equally to this work