Progressive improvement in short‐, medium‐ and long‐term graft survival in kidney transplantation patients in Ireland – a retrospective study

It is often quoted that while short‐term graft survival in kidney transplantation has improved in recent years, it has not translated into a commensurate improvement in long‐term graft survival. We considered whether this was true of the entire experience of the national kidney transplant program in Ireland. A retrospective analysis of the National Kidney Transplant Service (NKTS) database was undertaken to investigate patient and graft survival for all adult first deceased donor kidney transplant recipients in Ireland, 1971–2015. Three thousand two hundred and sixty recipients were included in this study. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to estimate survival at each time period post transplant for the various eras of transplantation. Uncensored graft survival has improved over the course of the program in Ireland at various time points despite risk factors for graft failure progressively increasing over successive eras. For example the graft survival at 15 years post transplant has increased from 10% in 1971–1975 to 45% by 1996–2000. Ireland has experienced a progressive improvement in long‐term graft survival following kidney transplantation. Whether these trends are attributable to biological or nonbiological factors is unclear but likely involves a combination of both.     

Ten‐year observational follow‐up of a randomized trial comparing cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy combined with steroid withdrawal in living‐donor renal transplantation

Although various strategies for steroid withdrawal after transplantation have been attempted, there are few reports of the long‐term results of steroid withdrawal regimens in kidney transplantation. Earlier, we reported on a 5‐year prospective, randomized, single‐center trial comparing the safety and efficacy of cyclosporine (CsA) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with that of tacrolimus (TAC) plus MMF, when steroids were withdrawn 6 months after kidney transplantation in low‐risk patients. We now report the 10‐year observational data on the study population. We collected data from the database of the Organ Transplantation Center, Samsung Medical Center for 5 years after completion of the original study (TAC group n = 62; CsA group n = 55). The 10‐year patient survival, death‐censored graft survival, and acute rejection‐free survival did not differ between groups (98% vs 96%; P = 0.49, 78% vs 85%; P = 0.75 and 84% vs 76%; P = 0.14 in the TAC group vs CsA group, respectively). In low‐risk patients, there was no difference in long‐term patient and graft survival between TAC‐ and CsA‐based late steroid withdrawal regimens that included MMF treatment. More long‐term randomized clinical trials are needed to clarify the benefits of late steroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation.     

De novo donor‐specific antibodies in belatacept‐treated vs cyclosporine‐treated kidney‐transplant recipients: Post hoc analyses of the randomized phase III BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT studies

Donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with an increased risk of antibody‐mediated rejection and graft failure. In BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT, kidney‐transplant recipients were randomized to receive belatacept more intense (MI)–based, belatacept less intense (LI)–based, or cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression for up to 7 years (84 months). The presence/absence of HLA‐specific antibodies was determined at baseline, at months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84, and at the time of clinically suspected episodes of acute rejection, using solid‐phase flow‐cytometry screening. Samples from anti‐HLA‐positive patients were further tested with a single‐antigen bead assay to determine antibody specificities, presence/absence of DSAs, and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of any DSAs present. In BENEFIT, de novo DSAs developed in 1.4%, 3.5%, and 12.1% of belatacept MI‐treated, belatacept LI‐treated, and cyclosporine‐treated patients, respectively. The corresponding values in BENEFIT‐EXT were 3.8%, 1.1%, and 11.2%. Per Kaplan‐Meier analysis, de novo DSA incidence was significantly lower in belatacept‐treated vs cyclosporine‐treated patients over 7 years in both studies (P < .01). In patients who developed de novo DSAs, belatacept‐based immunosuppression was associated with numerically lower MFI vs cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. Although derived post hoc, these data suggest that belatacept‐based immunosuppression suppresses de novo DSA development more effectively than cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression.     

Early post‐transplant conversion from tacrolimus to belatacept for prolonged delayed graft function improves renal function in kidney transplant recipients

Prolonged delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplant recipients imparts a risk of poor allograft function; tacrolimus may be detrimental in this setting. We conducted a retrospective single center analysis of the first 20 patients converted to belatacept for prolonged DGF as part of a clinical protocol as a novel treatment strategy to treat prolonged DGF. Prior to conversion, patients underwent an allograft biopsy to rule out rejection and confirm tubular injury. The primary outcome was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months post‐transplant; secondary outcome was the change in eGFR 30 days post‐belatacept conversion. At 1 year post‐transplant, the mean eGFR was 54.2 (SD 19.2) mL/min/1.73 m². The mean eGFR on the day of belatacept conversion was 16 (SD 12.7) mL/min/1.73 m² and rose to 43.1 (SD 15.8) mL/min/1.73 m² 30 days post‐conversion (P<.0001). The acute rejection rate was 20% with 100% patient survival at 12 months post‐transplant. There was one graft loss in the setting of an invasive Aspergillus infection that resulted in withdrawal of immunosuppression and transplant nephrectomy. Belatacept conversion for prolonged DGF is a novel treatment strategy that resulted in an improvement in eGFR. Additional follow‐up is warranted to confirm the long‐term benefits of this strategy.     

Long‐term survival in visceral transplant recipients in the new era: A single‐center experience

There is a paucity of data on long‐term outcomes following visceral transplantation in the contemporary era. This is a single‐center retrospective analysis of all visceral allograft recipients who underwent transplant between November 2003 and December 2013 with at least 3‐year follow‐up data. Clinical data from a prospectively maintained database were used to assess outcomes including patient and graft survival. Of 174 recipients, 90 were adults and 84 were pediatric patients. Types of visceral transplants were isolated intestinal transplant (56.3%), combined liver‐intestinal transplant (25.3%), multivisceral transplant (16.1%), and modified multivisceral transplant (2.3%). Three‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall patient survival was 69.5%, 66%, and 63%, respectively, while 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall graft survival was 67%, 62%, and 61%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, significant predictors of survival included pediatric recipient (P = .001), donor/recipient weight ratio <0.9 (P = .008), no episodes of severe acute rejection (P = .021), cold ischemia time <8 hours (P = .014), and shorter hospital stay (P = .0001). In conclusion, visceral transplantation remains a good option for treatment of end‐stage intestinal failure with parenteral nutritional complications. Proper graft selection, shorter cold ischemia time, and improvement of immunosuppression regimens could significantly improve the long‐term survival.     

Three‐Year Outcomes From BENEFIT‐EXT: A Phase III Study of Belatacept Versus Cyclosporine in Recipients of Extended Criteria Donor Kidneys

Recipients of extended‐criteria donor (ECD) kidneys have poorer long‐term outcomes compared to standard‐criteria donor kidney recipients. We report 3‐year outcomes from a randomized, phase III study in recipients of de novo ECD kidneys (n = 543) assigned (1:1:1) to either a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) belatacept regimen, or cyclosporine. Three hundred twenty‐three patients completed treatment by year 3. Patient survival with a functioning graft was comparable between groups (80% in MI, 82% in LI, 80% in cyclosporine). Mean calculated GFR (cGFR) was 11 mL/min higher in belatacept‐treated versus cyclosporine‐treated patients (42.7 in MI, 42.2 in LI, 31.5 mL/min in cyclosporine). More cyclosporine‐treated patients (44%) progressed to GFR <30 mL/min (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 4/5) than belatacept‐treated patients (27–30%). Acute rejection rates were similar between groups. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurrence was higher in belatacept‐treated patients (two in MI, three in LI), most of which occurred during the first 18 months; four additional cases (3 in LI, 1 in cyclosporine) occurred after 3 years. Tuberculosis was reported in two MI, four LI and no cyclosporine patients. In conclusion, at 3 years after transplantation, immunosuppression with belatacept resulted in similar patient survival, graft survival and acute rejection, with better renal function compared with cyclosporine. As previously reported, PTLD and tuberculosis were the principal safety findings associated with belatacept in this study population.     

Outcomes at 7 years post‐transplant in black vs nonblack kidney transplant recipients administered belatacept or cyclosporine in BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT

Clinical outcomes are generally worse for black vs nonblack renal allograft recipients. In BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT, recipients were randomized to belatacept more intense‐based, belatacept less intense‐based, or cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. At year 7, belatacept was associated with superior graft survival vs cyclosporine in BENEFIT (recipients of living or standard criteria deceased donor kidneys); belatacept was associated with similar graft survival vs cyclosporine in BENEFIT‐EXT (recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys). In both studies, renal function was superior for belatacept‐treated vs cyclosporine‐treated patients. Seven‐year outcomes were examined by race post hoc in each study. The effect of race and treatment on time to death or graft loss was compared using Cox regression. The interaction between treatment and race was also considered. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated from months 1 to 84 using a repeated‐measures model. In total, 8.3% (55/666) and 13.1% (71/543) of patients in BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT, respectively, were black. Time to death or graft loss was similar in blacks and nonblacks. For both subgroups, estimated mean GFR increased over 7 years for belatacept, but declined for cyclosporine. Outcomes were similar in belatacept‐treated black and nonblack patients. Due to the small number of black patients, these results must be interpreted with caution.     

Negative outcomes after liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic liver disease beyond the fifth post‐transplant year

Although up to 50% of patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) resume alcohol consumption after liver transplantation (LT), numerous studies indicate that long‐term results are not compromised. This study focused on evaluating the impact of ALD on outcomes up to and beyond the fifth year after LT. Among the 432 primary LT recipients included in this study, 97 underwent transplantation for ALD. Alcohol relapse rate at 10 yr was 33.5%, with younger recipient age being the only independent predictor (p = 0.019). Survival of patients with ALD (77.0%) was similar to those without (79.0%) up to the fifth post‐transplant year (p = 0.655) but worse during the five subsequent years among the five‐yr survivors (70.6% vs. 92.9%; p = 0.002). ALD was an independent risk factor for poorer survival beyond the fifth post‐transplant year (p = 0.049), but not earlier (p = 0.717). Conversely, alcohol relapse increased the risk of death only during the first five post‐transplant years (p = 0.039). There were no significant differences regarding graft failure incidence between ALD and non‐ALD recipients up to the fifth post‐transplant year (7.3% vs. 11.6%; p = 0.255) and beyond (12.9% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.126). In conclusion, pre‐transplant diagnosis of ALD yields negative effects on post‐transplant outcomes beyond the fifth post‐transplant year, not attributable to recidivism.     

Ten‐year outcomes in a randomized phase II study of kidney transplant recipients administered belatacept 4‐weekly or 8‐weekly

In the phase II IM103‐100 study, kidney transplant recipients were first randomized to belatacept more‐intensive‐based (n = 74), belatacept less‐intensive‐based (n = 71), or cyclosporine‐based (n = 73) immunosuppression. At 3‐6 months posttransplant, belatacept‐treated patients were re‐randomized to receive belatacept every 4 weeks (4‐weekly, n = 62) or every 8 weeks (8‐weekly, n = 60). Patients initially randomized to cyclosporine continued to receive cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. Cumulative rates of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) from first randomization to year 10 were 22.8%, 37.0%, and 25.8% for belatacept more‐intensive, belatacept less‐intensive, and cyclosporine, respectively (belatacept more‐intensive vs cyclosporine: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47‐1.92; P = .89; belatacept less‐intensive vs cyclosporine: HR = 1.61; 95% CI 0.85‐3.05; P = .15). Cumulative BPAR rates from second randomization to year 10 for belatacept 4‐weekly, belatacept 8‐weekly, and cyclosporine were 11.1%, 21.9%, and 13.9%, respectively (belatacept 4‐weekly vs cyclosporine: HR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.35‐3.17, P = .92; belatacept 8‐weekly vs cyclosporine: HR = 2.00, 95% CI 0.75‐5.35, P = .17). Renal function trends were estimated using a repeated‐measures model. Estimated mean GFR values at year 10 for belatacept 4‐weekly, belatacept 8‐weekly, and cyclosporine were 67.0, 68.7, and 42.7 mL/min per 1.73 m², respectively (P<.001 for overall treatment effect). Although not statistically significant, rates of BPAR were 2‐fold higher in patients administered belatacept every 8 weeks vs every 4 weeks.     

Impact of ureteral stricture and treatment choice on long‐term graft survival in kidney transplantation

We aimed to evaluate the influence of urological complications occurring within the first year after kidney transplantation on long‐term patient and graft outcomes, and sought to examine the impact of the management approach of ureteral strictures on long‐term graft function. We collected data on urological complications occurring within the first year posttransplant. Graft survivals, patient survival, and rejection rates were compared between recipients with and without urological complications. Male gender of the recipient, delayed graft function, and donor age were found to be significant risk factors for urological complications after kidney transplantation (P < .05). Death censored graft survival analysis showed that only ureteral strictures had a negative impact on long‐term graft survival (P = .0009) compared to other complications. Death censored graft survival was significantly shorter in kidney recipients managed initially with minimally invasive approach when compared to the recipients with no stricture (P = .001). However, graft survival was not statistically different in patients managed initially with open surgery (P = .47). Ureteral strictures following kidney transplantation appear to be strongly negatively correlated with long‐term graft survival. Our analysis suggests that kidney recipients with ureteral stricture should be managed initially with open surgery, with better long‐term graft survival.     

No impact of disseminated intravascular coagulation in kidney donors on long‐term kidney transplantation outcome: A multicenter propensity‐matched study

The diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is often considered to be a contraindication to organ donation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of DIC+ donors on kidney recipient (KR) evolution. We identified 169 KRs with DIC+ donation after brain death donors between January 1996 and December 2012 in 6 French transplant centers. Individuals were matched using propensity scores to 338 recipients with DIC? donors according to donor age and sex, whether expanded criteria for the donor existed, graft year, and transplantation center. After kidney transplantation, delayed graft function was observed in 28.1% of DIC+ KRs and in 22.8% of DIC? KRs (NS). Renal allograft survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 94.5%, 89.3%, and 73.9% and 96.2%, 90.8%, and 81.3% in DIC+ KRs and DIC? KRs, respectively (NS). The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was similar between DIC+ and DIC? KRs at 3 months, 1 year, and 10 years: 45.9 vs 48.1 mL/min, 42.1 vs 43.1 mL/min, and 33.9 vs 38.1 mL/min, respectively. Delayed calcineurin inhibitor introduction or induction had no impact on delayed graft function rate or eGFR evolution at 10 years after transplantation in DIC+ KRs. Donor DIC did not seem to affect initial outcome, long‐term graft function, or allograft survival.     

Minimization of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation comparing cyclosporine A/azathioprine or cyclosporine A/mycophenolate mofetil bitherapy to cyclosporine A monotherapy: a 10‐year postrandomization follow‐up study

Long‐term outcomes in renal transplant recipients withdrawn from steroid and submitted to further minimization of immunosuppressive regimen after 1 year are lacking. In this multicenter study, 204 low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients were randomized 14.2 ± 3.7 months post‐transplantation to receive either cyclosporine A (CsA) + azathioprine (AZA; n = 53), CsA + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 53), or CsA monotherapy (n = 98). At 3 years postrandomization, the occurrence of biopsy for graft dysfunction was similar in bitherapy and monotherapy groups (21/106 vs. 26/98; P = 0.25). At 10 years postrandomization, patients’ survival was 100%, 94.2%, and 95.8% (P = 0.25), and death‐censored graft survival was 94.9%, 94.7%, and 95.2% (P = 0.34) in AZA, MMF, and CsA groups, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 70.4 ± 31.1, 60.1 ± 22.2, and 60.1 ± 19.0 ml/min/1.73 m², respectively (P = 0.16). The incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection was 1.4%/year in the whole cohort. None of the patients developed polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy. The main cause of graft loss (n = 12) was chronic antibody‐mediated rejection (n = 6). De novo donor‐specific antibodies were detected in 13% of AZA‐, 21% of MMF‐, and 14% of CsA‐treated patients (P = 0.29). CsA monotherapy after 1 year is safe and associated with prolonged graft survival in well‐selected renal transplant recipient ( ClinicalTrials.gov number: 980654).     

Outcome of sirolimus‐based immunosuppression,fifteen years post–live‐donor kidney transplantation: Single‐center experience

In a prospective randomized controlled trial, between May 2001 and January 2003, 132 live‐donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive sirolimus primary immunosuppression, either in combination with low dose tacrolimus (Tac group) or in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF group). We have previously reported on 2‐ and 5‐year follow‐up results, with favorable patient and graft outcomes obtained in both groups. In view of recent published reports of increased risk of inferior outcomes among sirolimus‐treated patients, we herein present results of an observational extension of the previously randomized patients 15 years post‐transplantation. Mortality rates were 10.8% and 3% in Tac and MMF groups respectively after mean follow‐up period of 11.2‐11.8 years. Comparable graft survival rates were obtained in both groups ranging from 60% to 62.7%. The (MMF) group continued to have the advantage of remaining on primary plan of immunosuppression (56.7% of patients) as well as to maintain better graft function in terms of serum creatinine level. Herein, we presented longest term published data for sirolimus‐based immunosuppression among live‐donor kidney transplants with favorable outcome in terms of survival and graft function.     

Kidney transplant from uncontrolled donation after circulatory death donors maintained by nECMO has long‐term outcomes comparable to standard criteria donation after brain death

Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) increases organ availability for kidney transplant (KT) with short‐term outcomes similar to those obtained from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. However, heterogeneous results in the long term have been reported. We compared 10‐year outcomes between 237 KT recipients from uDCD donors maintained by normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (nECMO) and 237 patients undergoing KT from standard criteria DBD donors during the same period at our institution. We further analyzed risk factors for death‐censored graft survival in the uDCD group. Delayed graft function (DGF) was more common in the uDCD group (73.4% vs 46.4%; P < .01), although glomerular filtration rates at the end of follow‐up were similar in the 2 groups. uDCD and DBD groups had similar rates for 10‐year death‐censored graft (82.1% vs 80.4%; P = .623) and recipient survival (86.2% vs 87.6%; P = .454). Donor age >50 years was associated with graft loss in the uDCD group (hazard ratio: 1.91; P = .058), whereas the occurrence of DGF showed no significant effect. uDCD KT under nECMO support resulted in similar graft function and long‐term outcomes compared with KT from standard criteria DBD donors. Increased donor age could negatively affect graft survival after uDCD donation.     

Influence of pretransplant midodrine use on outcomes after kidney transplantation

Evaluation of potential kidney transplant recipients is important to identify and treat conditions that may influence graft or patient survival after transplantation. We performed a single‐center, observational cohort study to determine whether pretransplant midodrine use influences outcomes after kidney transplantation. We analyzed graft and patient outcomes for adult patients who underwent a kidney‐only transplantation at Barnes‐Jewish Hospital from January 1999 to December 2015. We quantified adjusted associations of pretransplant midodrine use with post‐transplant complications by multivariable Cox regression. Among the 2621 kidney transplant recipients analyzed, 37 (1.4%) were taking midodrine immediately prior to transplantation. Midodrine users were more commonly older (56.5 vs 50.4 years) and obese (67.6% vs 33.6%). Midodrine users were also more likely to be on hemodialysis (86.5% vs 59.2%), to have a longer duration of dialysis dependence (646 months vs 577 months), and to have higher levels of sensitization (peak panel reactive antibody >20%, 32.4% vs 15.8%) compared to nonusers. Pretransplant midodrine users had significantly higher rates of delayed graft function (DGF) (32.4% vs 6.7%, P < 0.001). No difference in the incidence of DGF was observed based on the midodrine dosing regimen. After multivariable adjustment for recipient and donor characteristics, pretransplant midodrine use was independently associated with graft failure at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.09‐12.49).     

Pediatric heart transplantation at adult‐specialty centers in the United States: A multicenter registry analysis

Recent Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network bylaw revisions mandate that US transplant programs have an “approved pediatric component” in order to perform heart transplantation (HT) in patients <18 years old. The impact of this change on adolescents, a group known to be at high risk for graft loss and nonadherence, is unknown. We studied all US primary pediatric (age <18 years) HT from 2000 to 2015 to compare graft survival between centers organized mainly for adult versus pediatric care. Centers were designated as pediatric‐ or adult‐specialty care according to the ratio of pediatric:adult HT performed and minimum age of HT (pediatric‐specialty defined as ratio>0.7; adult‐specialty ratio<0.05 and minimum age >8 years). In propensity score‐matched cohorts, we observed no difference in graft loss by center type (median survival: adult 12.4 years vs pediatric 9.2 years, P = .174). Compared to the matched pediatric cohort, adult‐specialty center recipients lived closer to their transplant center (31 vs 45 miles, P = .012), and trended toward fewer out‐of‐state transplants (15 vs 25%, P = .082). Our data suggest that select adolescents can achieve similar midterm graft survival at centers organized primarily for adult HT care. Regardless of post‐HT setting, the development of care models that demonstrably improve adherence may be of greatest benefit to improving survival of this high‐risk population.     

Pre‐existing donor‐specific antibodies are detrimental to kidney allograft only when persistent after transplantation

Donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) increase the risk of allograft rejection and graft failure. They may be present before transplant or develop de novo after transplantation. Here, we studied the evolution of preformed DSA and their impact on graft outcome in kidney transplant recipients. Using the Luminex Single Antigen assay, we analyzed the sera on the day of transplantation of 239 patients who received a kidney transplant. Thirty‐seven patients (15.5%) had pre‐existing DSA detected the day of transplantation. After 5 years, the pre‐existing DSA disappeared in 22 patients whereas they persisted in 12. Variables associated with DSA persistence were age <50 years (P = 0.009), a history of previous transplantation (P = 0.039), the presence of class II DSA (P = 0.009), an MFI of preformed DSA >3500 (P < 0.001), and the presence of two or more DSA (P < 0.001). DSA persistence was associated with a higher risk of graft loss and antibody‐mediated rejection. Previously undetected preformed DSA are deleterious to graft survival only when they persist after transplantation.     

Donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies detected by Luminex: predictive for short‐term but not long‐term survival after heart transplantation

In heart transplantation, the clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) detected by solid phase assay (SPA), which is more sensitive than the conventional complement‐dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assays, is unclear. The aim was to evaluate SPA performed on pretransplant sera for survival after heart transplantation. Pretransplant sera of 272 heart transplant recipients were screened for anti‐HLA antibodies using CDC and SPA. For determination of pretransplant DSA, a single‐antigen bead assay was performed. The presence of anti‐HLA antibodies was correlated with survival. Secondary outcome parameters were acute cellular rejection, graft coronary vasculopathy and ejection fraction. In Kaplan–Meier analysis, SPA‐screening did not predict survival (P = 0.494), this in contrast to CDC screening (P = 0.002). However, the presence of pretransplant DSA against HLA class I was associated with decreased short‐term survival compared to non‐DSA (P = 0.038). ROC curve analysis showed a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 73% at a cutoff of 2000 MFI. In contrast, the presence of anti‐HLA antibodies had no influence on long‐term survival, rejection incidence, and graft function. Thus, detection of DSA class I in pretransplant serum is a strong predictor of short‐term, but not long‐term survival and may help in the early management of heart transplant patients.     

A Phase III Study of Belatacept Versus Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplants from Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT‐EXT Study)

Recipients of extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are at increased risk for graft dysfunction/loss, and may benefit from immunosuppression that avoids calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. Belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker, may preserve renal function and improve long‐term outcomes versus CNIs. BENEFIT‐EXT (Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First‐line Immunosuppression Trial—EXTended criteria donors) is a 3‐year, Phase III study that assessed a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept versus cyclosporine in adult ECD kidney transplant recipients. The coprimary endpoints at 12 months were composite patient/graft survival and a composite renal impairment endpoint. Patient/graft survival with belatacept was similar to cyclosporine (86% MI, 89% LI, 85% cyclosporine) at 12 months. Fewer belatacept patients reached the composite renal impairment endpoint versus cyclosporine (71% MI, 77% LI, 85% cyclosporine; p = 0.002 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.06 LI vs. cyclosporine). The mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 4–7 mL/min higher on belatacept versus cyclosporine (p = 0.008 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.1039 LI vs. cyclosporine), and the overall cardiovascular/metabolic profile was better on belatacept versus cyclosporine. The incidence of acute rejection was similar across groups (18% MI; 18% LI; 14% cyclosporine). Overall rates of infection and malignancy were similar between groups; however, more cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurred in the CNS on belatacept. ECD kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept‐based immunosuppression achieved similar patient/graft survival, better renal function, had an increased incidence of PTLD, and exhibited improvement in the cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus cyclosporine‐treated patients.