Improved graft survival of pediatric liver recipients transplanted with pediatric-aged liver donors

BACKGROUND: Improving graft survival after liver transplantation is an important goal for the transplant community, particularly given the increasing donor shortage. We have examined graft survivals of livers procured from pediatric donors compared to adult donors. METHODS: The effect of donor age (<18 years or > or =18 years) on graft survivals for both pediatric and adult liver recipients was analyzed using data reported to the UNOS Scientific Registry from January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1997. Graft survival, stratified by age, status at listing, and type of transplant was computed using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, odds ratios of graft failure at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years posttransplant were calculated using a multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for several donor and recipient factors. Modeling, using the UNOS Liver Allocation Model investigated the impact of a proposed policy giving pediatric patients preference to pediatric donors. RESULTS: Between 1992 and 1997 pediatric recipients received 35.6% of pediatric aged donor livers. In 1998 the percent of children dying on the list was 7.4%, compared with 7.3% of adults. Kaplan-Meier graft survivals showed that pediatric patients receiving livers from pediatric aged donors had an 81% 3-year graft survival compared with 63% if children received livers from donors > or =18 years (P<0.001). In contrast, adult recipients had similar 3-year graft survivals irrespective of donor age. In the multivariate analysis, the odds of graft failure were reduced to 0.66 if pediatric recipients received livers from pediatric aged donors (P<0.01). The odds of graft failure were not affected at any time point for adults whether they received an adult or pediatric- aged donor. The modeling results showed that the number of pediatric patients trans planted increased by at most 59 transplants per year. This had no significant effect on the probability of pretransplant death for adults on the waiting list. Waiting time for children at status 2B was reduced by as much as 160 days whereas adult waiting time at status 2B was increased by at most 20 days. CONCLUSION: A policy that would direct some livers procured from pediatric- aged donors to children improves the graft survival of children after liver transplantation. The effect of this policy does not increase mortality of adults waiting. Such a policy should increase the practice of split liver transplantation, which remains an important method to increase the cadaveric donor supply.     

Risk factors for renal allograft survival from pediatric cadaver donors: an analysis of united network for organ sharing data

BACKGROUND: The shortage of cadaveric donors for kidney transplantation has prompted many centers to use cadaver kidneys from pediatric donors. Use of kidneys from pediatric donors has been shown to have a lower graft survival. METHODS: Recipients receiving cadaver kidneys from pediatric and adult donors between 1988 and 1995 were analyzed. The data were obtained from United Network of Organ Sharing database. The actuarial kidney transplant graft survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify various risk factors for 1-year graft failure. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated for various risk factors. RESULTS: Kidney transplant survival rates for donor age <18 years (n=12,838) at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 81.5%, 76.3%, 71.3%, 66.4%, and 61.7%, respectively. The corresponding results for adult donors from age 18 to 50 years (n=35, 442) were 83.5%, 78.4%, 73.1%, 67.9%, and 62.4%, respectively, Log-rank test P<0.01. Pediatric donors were further divided into three groups according to donor age: group I (0-5 years), group II (6-11 years), and group III (12-17 years). The actuarial survival rates for 1, 3, and 5 years for group I (n=2198) were 73.6%, 63.3%, and 55.6%, respectively. The corresponding values for group II (n=2873) were 78.0%, 67.5%, and 57.8% and for group III (n=7767) were 85%, 75.0%, and 64.8%, respectively, P<0.01. Although the recipients of group I had lower graft survival, en bloc grafts (n=751) had much better 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates (76.3%, 67.7%, and 60.7%, respectively) compared with single grafts (n=1447; 72.2%, 61.1%, and 53.2%, P=0.02) from donors 0 to 5 years. Graft thrombosis as a cause of graft failure was seen in 10% of group I compared with 6% in group II and 5% in group III. In group I, lower OR were seen when an en bloc transplant was performed (0.688, P<0.01) and when donor body weight was>15 kg (0.547, P<0.01). However, OR were elevated in recipients of previous transplants (1.556, P<0.01), with prolonged cold ischemic time (1.097, P=0.03), for black recipients (1.288, P=0.03), and for recipients with body mass index> or =25 (1.286, P=0.02). Progressive increase in the donor age was associated with lower OR in group II (0.894, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Overall, poorer graft survival was seen in pediatric donor transplants, (2) transplant kidney survival with en bloc kidneys was better than a single kidney from donors 0-5 years, (3) progressive increase in donor age was associated with improved graft survival when the donors were 6-11 years, whereas progressive increase in donor weight was associated with improved graft survival when the donors were 0-5 years.     

Outcome of the use of pediatric donor livers in adult recipients

The prolonged waiting time caused by the lack of donor livers leads to an increasing number of terminally ill patients waiting for lifesaving liver transplantation. To rescue these patients, transplant programs are accepting donor organs from the expanded donor pool, using donors of increasingly older age, as well as from the pediatric age group, often despite significant mismatch in liver size. We investigated the outcome of 102 consecutive liver transplantations using pediatric donor livers in adult recipients. One-year graft survival using donors aged 12 years or younger (group 1, n = 14) and donors aged 12 to 18 years (group 2, n = 88) was compared. In addition, risk factors for graft loss and vascular complications were analyzed. The 1-year graft survival rate in adult transplant recipients in group 1 was 64.3% compared with 87.5% in those in group 2 (P = .015). The main cause of graft loss was arterial complications, occurring in 5 of 16 transplant recipients (31.3%). Major risk factors for graft loss and vascular complications were related to the size of the donor: age, height and weight, body surface area of donor and recipient, and warm ischemic time. We conclude that the outcome of small pediatric donor livers in adult recipients is poor, mainly because of the increased incidence of arterial complications. When a pediatric donor is used in an adult recipient, ischemic time should be kept to a minimum and anticoagulative therapy should be administered in the immediate postoperative period to avoid arterial complications. However, because small pediatric donors are the only source of lifesaving organs for the infant recipient, the use of small pediatric donor livers in adults should be avoided. (Liver transpl 2001;7:38-40.)     

OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Liver

Data on adult liver transplants performed in the US in 2018 are notable for (1) continued growth in numbers of new waitlist registrants (11,844) and transplants performed (8250); (2) continued increase in the transplant rate (54.5 per 100 waitlist‐years); (3) a precipitous decline in waitlist registrations and transplants for hepatitis‐C‐related indications; (4) increases in waitlist registrants and recipients with alcoholic liver disease and with clinical profiles consistent with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease; (5) increased use of hepatitis C virus antibody‐positive donor livers; and (6) continued improvement in graft survival despite changing recipient characteristics such as older age and higher rates of obesity and diabetes. Variability in transplant rates remained by candidate race, hepatocellular carcinoma status, urgency status, and geography. The volume of pediatric liver transplants was relatively unchanged. The highest rate of pre‐transplant mortality persisted for children aged younger than 1 year. Children underwent transplant at higher acuity than in the past, as evidenced by higher model for end‐stage liver disease/pediatric end‐stage liver disease scores and listings at status 1A and 1B at transplant. Despite higher illness severity scores at transplant, pediatric graft and patient survival posttransplant have improved over time.     

High body mass index and short- and long-term renal allograft survival in adults

BACKGROUND: The effect of recipient obesity on kidney allograft survival remains enigmatic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of donor and recipient body mass index on graft survival. METHODS: Retrospective study of 193 consecutive, adult renal transplants, with at least six months follow-up (mean 24+/-14.1 months). Patients were divided into two groups based upon body mass index (BMI), [weight (kg)/height (m)]: normal (<30.0, n=137) and obese (> or =30.0, n=56). Endpoints were graft loss, defined as either total loss of graft function (return to dialysis) or patient death with a functional graft. Unadjusted and adjusted multivariate analysis techniques, including Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used. RESULTS.: Individuals with a BMI > or =30 were not more likely to experience graft loss (O.R. 0.93, 95% C.I. 0.50, 1.72). Rates of acute rejection were not increased in obese recipients. While mortality was not increased in the BMI > 30 group, morbidity, especially surgical, had an increased incidence. The ratio of recipient to donor BMI did not influence graft survival. CONCLUSION: Obese recipients (BMI > or =30.0) were not at increased risk for graft failure. Additionally, matching donor and recipient BMI's would not appear to substantially improve transplant outcome. Obese recipients do have increased posttransplant morbidity and risk all the known health consequences associated with obesity. Careful evaluation and clinical management of obese patients allows for successful kidney transplantation with results equivalent to normal BMI patients.     

Pediatric liver and kidney transplantation with allografts from DCD donors: A review of UNOS data

INTRODUCTION: Donation after cardiac death (DCD) is recognized as an important source of allografts to bridge the growing disequilibrium between the number of donors and recipients. Current transplant experience with DCD organs has focused on the adult recipient population, however little is known about the pediatric recipient experience. While there is increasing acceptance of these grafts in adults, transplant centers appear reluctant to use these grafts in the pediatric population. METHODS: We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing database from 1995-2005 to determine the national experience with pediatric recipients of DCD organs. RESULTS: Among 4026 renal transplants performed in children 18 years and younger, 26 (0.6%) received a renal allograft from a DCD donor. Ten (38.5%) received kidney allografts from pediatric donors (age < or = 18) and 16 (61.5%) from adult donors (age > 18 years). Graft survival at one and five years was 82.5%, 74.3% for kidneys from DCD donors compared to 89.6%, 64.8% from brain dead donors (DBD) (P = 0.7). Among 4991 liver transplants, 19 (0.4%) were from DCD donors. Sixteen patients (84.2%) received livers from pediatric donors and three (15.8%) from adult donors. Graft survival at one and five years was 89.2%, 79.3% for livers from DCD, compared to 75.6%, 65.8% for DBD (P = 0.3). CONCLUSION: The use of DCD donors in the pediatric population is very limited; however graft survival is comparable to DBD grafts. Although pediatric centers may have been reluctant to utilize this donor source, this limited experience demonstrates that the select use of DCD organs can produce acceptable and durable graft survival in the pediatric population.     

OPTN/SRTR 2017 Annual Data Report: Liver

Data on adult liver transplants performed in the US in 2017 are notable for (1) continued growth in numbers of new waitlist registrants (11,514) and of transplants performed (8,082); (2) continued increase in the transplant rate (51.5 per 100 waitlist‐years); (3) a precipitous decrease in waitlist registrations and transplants for hepatitis C‐related indications; (4) reciprocal increases in waitlist registrants and recipients with alcoholic liver disease and with clinical profiles consistent with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease; and (5) continued improvement in graft survival despite changing recipient characteristics such as older age and higher rates of obesity. Variability in transplant rates remained by candidate race, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, urgency status (status 1A versus model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) score >35), and geography. More than half of all children listed for liver transplant in 2017 were aged younger than 5 years in 2017, and the highest rate of pretransplant mortality persisted for children aged younger than 1 year. Children underwent transplant at higher acuity than the past, as evidenced by higher MELD/pediatric end‐stage liver disease scores and listings at status 1A and 1B. Higher acuity at transplant is likely due to lack of access to suitable donor organs, which has been compensated for by persistent trends toward use of partial or split liver grafts and ABO‐incompatible grafts. Despite higher illness severity scores at transplant, pediatric graft and patient survival posttransplant have improved over time.     

Split and whole liver transplantation outcomes: a comparative cohort study.

A specific split liver transplantation (SLT) program has been pursued in the North Italian Transplant program (NITp) since November 1997. After 5 yr, 1,449 liver transplants were performed in 7 transplant centers, using 1,304 cadaveric donors. Whole liver transplantation (WLT) and SLT were performed in 1,126 and 323 cases, respectively. SLTs were performed in situ as 147 left lateral segments (LLS), 154 right trisegment liver (RTL) grafts, and 22 modified split livers (MSL), used for couples of adult recipients. After a median posttransplant follow-up of 22 months, SLTs achieved a 3-yr patient and graft survival not significantly different from the entire series of transplants (79.4 and 72.2% vs. 80.6 and 74.9%, respectively). Recipients receiving a WLT or a LLS showed significantly better outcomes than patients receiving RTL and MSL (P < 0.03 for patients and P < 0.04 for graft survival). At the multivariate analysis, donor age of >60 yr, RTL transplant, <50 annual transplants volume, urgent transplantation (United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status I and IIA), ischemia time of >7 hours, and retransplantation were factors independently related to graft failure and to significantly worst patient survival. Right grafts procured from RTL and either split procured as MSL had a similar outcome of marginal whole livers. In conclusion, in 5 yr, the increased number of pediatric transplants due to split liver donation reduced to 3% the in-list children mortality, and a decrease in the adult patient dropout rate from 27.2 to 16.2% was observed. Such results justify a more widespread adoption of SLT protocols, organizational difficulties not being a limit for the application of such technique.     

The Impact of Donor Obesity on Outcomes after Cadaver Pancreas Transplants

We examined the impact of donor obesity on surgical complications and graft function after pancreas transplants. From January 1994 through December 2001, we performed 711 cadaver pancreas transplants. We analyzed outcomes for three groups based on donor body mass index (BMI): <25 kg/m2 (n=434), 25-30 (n=196), and >30 (n=81). Donor characteristics were similar between the three groups except for donor cause of death. Cerebrovascular deaths were more common in the BMI >30 group (p=0.002), while trauma deaths were more common in the BMI <25 group (p=0.02). In the BMI >30 group, surgical complications, most notably surgical infections and thrombosis, were significantly more common; in addition, technical failure rates were higher and short-term graft survival was inferior. The incidence of technical failure was 9.7% in the BMI <25 group, 16.3% in the BMI 25-30 group, and 21.0% in the BMI >30 group (p=0.04). However, when we looked at only technically successful transplants, we found minimal differences in the three groups with regard to graft survival at 1 and 3 years posttransplant. Donor obesity increased the incidence of surgical complications in our pancreas recipients, but did not affect initial graft function posttransplant. Technically successful transplants using obese donors results in good graft function at 1 and 3 years posttransplant.     

Right lobe living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of livers for transplantation has prompted transplant centers to seek alternatives to conventional cadaveric liver transplantation. Left lateral segmentectomy from living donors has proven to be a safe operation for the donor with excellent results in the pediatric population. Left lobectomy, conceived to supply more tissue, still provides insufficient liver mass for an average size adult patient. Right lobectomy could supply a graft of adequate size. METHODS: Donors were considered only after recipients were listed according to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) criteria. Donor evaluation included liver biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging, and celiac and mesenteric angiography. The donor operation consisted of a right lobectomy uniformly performed throughout the series as described herein. RESULTS: Twenty-five right lobe living donor liver transplants were performed between adults, with no significant complications in donors. Recipient and graft survival was 88%, with three recipient deaths secondary to uncontrolled sepsis in patients at high risk for liver transplant; all three had functioning grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Right lobe living donor liver transplantation poses challenges that require a meticulous surgical technique to minimize morbidity in the recipient. Right lobectomies for living donation can be performed safely with minimal risk to both donor and recipient although providing adequate liver mass for an average size adult patient.     

Gender Differences in Liver Donor Quality Are Predictive of Graft Loss

Some studies have found that donor–recipient gender mismatch predicts posttransplant outcomes but whether this is independent of donor quality is unknown. To evaluate the association between gender mismatch and graft loss, 11 508 females (F) and 16 714 males (M) who underwent liver transplant from March 1, 2002 to December 31, 2007 were studied. Of 11 donor characteristics, clinically relevant differences between F and M donors were median age (47 vs. 39 years), height (165 vs. 178 cm) and proportion dying of stroke (59 vs. 35%) (p < 0.001 for all). The donor risk index was significantly lower for F than M donors (1.3 vs. 1.6, p < 0.001). Recipients of gender‐mismatched grafts had an 11% higher risk of graft loss (p < 0.001). Compared to M→M donor–recipient‐matched transplants in univariable analysis, F→M mismatch was associated with a 17% increased risk of graft loss (95% CI = 1.11–1.24, p < 0.001), whereas M→F mismatch was not (HR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.96–1.09; p = 0.46). However, adjustment for significant recipient and donor factors eliminated the association between F→M mismatch and graft loss (HR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.89–1.02; p = 0.18). In conclusion, donor quality differs significantly between female and male donors—female donors are older, shorter and die more frequently of stroke—and gender differences in donor quality, rather than gender mismatch are predictive of graft loss.     

Single Kidney Transplantation from Young Pediatric Donors in the United States

Kidney transplantation (KTX) from small pediatric donors is performed as single or en bloc. Criteria to determine when to split pediatric donor kidneys and transplant as singles are not well established. Data reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient for donors <10 yrs from 1995 to 2007 were reviewed (n = 5079). Donors were categorized by weight group by 5 kg increments and solitary (n = 3503) versus en bloc (n = 1576). The primary outcome was overall graft survival. Results were compared as adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) relative to ideal standard criteria donors (SCDs) (defined as age 18–39 without other risk factors), non‐ideal SCDs (all other SCDs) and expanded criteria donors (age 50–59 with other risk factors or age ≥60). Single KTX from donors ≥ 35 kg conferred a similar risk of graft survival as ideal SCDs. Of donors 10–34 kg, risks of en bloc KTX were similar to ideal and risks of single KTX to non‐ideal SCDs; single and en bloc KTXs had 7.9 and 5.2 graft losses per 100 follow‐up years, respectively. Single KTX from donors >35 kg are similar to ideal SCDs. Single KTX from donors 10–35 kg are similar to non‐ideal SCDs. From a resource perspective, pediatric donors 10–35 kg used as singles offer more cumulative graft years than when used en bloc.     

Factors Affecting Graft Survival After Adult/Child Split-Liver Transplantation: Analysis of the UNOS/OPTN Data Base

When considering advocacy of split-liver transplantation, it is important to understand whether comparable outcomes can be achieved. The goal of this study was to identify donor and transplant characteristics predictive of comparable outcomes by risk factor analysis. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing/ Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data base between January 1996 and May 2006, first time adult/child split cases (568 adults, 508 children) were examined. In multivariate analysis, recipient medical condition (hospitalization), status 1 assignment, ABO incompatibility, donor age (>40 years), donor body weight (≤40 kg), calculated whole graft volume to recipient body weight ratio (cGRWR ≤1.5%) and no sharing between centers were significant risk factors in adult recipients.
Recipient diagnosis of tumor, dialysis prior to transplant, recipient body weight (≤6 kg), donor age (>30 years), donor history of cardiac arrest after declaration of death and cold ischemia time (CIT > 6 h) increased the risk of graft failure in pediatric recipients. The livers from young donors showed comparable outcomes to whole deceased liver transplantation (LT) when other transplant-related risk factors were minimized in adult recipients. Reducing CIT is important to obtain comparable outcomes to living donor LT in pediatric recipients.     

Recovery and Utilization of Deceased Donor Kidneys from Small Pediatric Donors

The optimal use of kidneys from small pediatric deceased donors remains undetermined. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, 2886 small (< 21 kg) pediatric donors between 1993 and 2002 were identified. Donor factors predictive of kidney recovery and transplantation (1343 en bloc; 1600 single) were identified by logistic regression. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the risk of graft loss. The rate of kidney recovery from small pediatric donors was significantly higher with increasing age, weight and height. The odds of transplant of recovered small donor kidneys were significantly higher with increasing age, weight, height and en bloc recovery (adjusted odds ratio = 65.8 vs. single; p < 0.0001), and significantly lower with increasing creatinine. Compared to en bloc, solitary transplants had a 78% higher risk of graft loss (p < 0.0001). En bloc transplants had a similar graft survival to ideal donors (p = 0.45) while solitary transplants had an increased risk of graft loss (p < 0.0001). En bloc recovery of kidneys from small pediatric donors may result in the highest probability of transplantation. Although limited by the retrospective nature of the study, kidneys transplanted en bloc had a similar graft survival to ideal donors but may not maximize the number of successfully transplanted recipients.     

Feasibility and limits of split liver transplantation from pediatric donors: an italian multicenter experience

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a multicenter experience of split liver transplantation (SLT) with pediatric donors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There are no reports in the literature regarding pediatric liver splitting; further; the use of donors weighing <40 kg for SLT is currently not recommended. METHODS: From 1997 to 2004, 43 conventional split liver procedures from donors aged <15 years were performed. Nineteen donors weighing < or =40 kg and 24 weighing >40 kg were used. Dimensional matching was based on donor-to-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) for left lateral segment (LLS) and on estimated graft-to-recipient weight ratio (eGRWR) for extended right grafts (ERG). In 3 cases, no recipient was found for an ERG. The celiac trunk was retained with the LLS in all but 1 case. Forty LLSs were transplanted into 39 children, while 39 ERGs were transplanted into 11 children and 28 adults. RESULTS: Two-year patient and graft survival rates were not significantly different between recipients of donors < or =40 kg and >40 kg, between pediatric and adult recipients, and between recipients of LLSs and ERGs. Vascular complication rates were 12% in the < or =40 kg donor group and 6% in the >40 kg donor group (P = not significant). There were no differences in the incidence of other complications. Donor ICU stay >3 days and the use of an interposition arterial graft were associated with an increased risk of graft loss and arterial complications, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Splitting of pediatric liver grafts is an effective strategy to increase organ availability, but a cautious evaluation of the use of donors < or =40 kg is necessary. Prolonged donor ICU stay is associated with poorer outcomes. The maintenance of the celiac trunk with LLS does not seem detrimental for right-sided grafts, whereas the use of interposition grafts for arterial reconstruction should be avoided.     

The development of proteinuria and focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis in recipients of pediatric donor kidneys

Several reports in animals, and sporadic case reports in humans, have suggested that kidneys with decreased nephron mass may be more susceptible to the development of focal-segmental glomerosclerosis. This prompted a reexamination of our previously reported group of pediatric donor-adult recipient renal transplant combinations. Data were analyzed from 31 adult recipients who had received renal transplants from cadaver pediatric donors (less than 6 years) with graft function for greater than 6 months and no evidence of chronic rejection. These were compared with a control group transplanted during the same period with adult donor kidneys. Immunosuppression consisted of azathioprine/prednisone or quadruple therapy in 16 and 15 patients respectively. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) was secondary to chronic glomerulonephritis (n = 9), diabetes mellitus (n = 6), polycystic kidney disease (n = 5), and miscellaneous causes (n = 11). Twenty patients had radiographic documentation of renal hypertrophy posttransplant. All patients had serial 24-hr urinalysis for protein and creatinine after transplantation during periods of stable renal function. Ten patients had renal biopsies performed at a mean time from transplant to biopsy of 10.4 +/- 1.6 months. Seven recipients had biopsies that revealed glomerulosclerosis at 13 +/- 6 months posttransplant. Protein excretion and serum creatinine in these patients were significantly higher than in control patients (1.6 +/- 0.37 vs. 0.49 +/- 0.15 g/24 hr and 1.96 +/- 0.11 vs. 1.64 +/- 0.09 mg%; P less than 0.03 and P less than 0.01, respectively). Only 3 of 25 control adult donor recipients developed proteinuria greater than 0.8 g/24 hr within 2 years of transplantation vs. 15/31 pediatric donor recipients. No correlations with the etiology of ESRD, age (greater than or less than 40 years), weight, sex, diabetes, hypertension, or the number of acute rejection episodes could be found. Our data suggest that adult recipients of pediatric donor renal transplants may be at greater risk for the development of glomerulosclerosis than those recipients receiving adult donor kidneys.     

Differential Rates of Ischemic Cholangiopathy and Graft Survival Associated With Induction Therapy in DCD Liver Transplantation

Transplantation utilizing donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors is associated with ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) and graft loss. The University of Washington (UW) DCD experience totals 89 DCD liver transplants performed between 2003 and 2011. Overall outcome after DCD liver transplantation at UW demonstrates Kaplan–Meier estimated 5‐year patient and graft survival rates of 81.6% and 75.6%, respectively, with the great majority of patient and graft losses occurring in the first‐year posttransplant from IC. Our program has almost exclusively utilized either anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG) or basiliximab induction (86/89) for DCD liver transplantations. Analysis of the differential effect of induction agent on graft survival demonstrated graft survival of 96.9% at 1 year for ATG versus 75.9% for basiliximab (p = 0.013). The improved survival did not appear to be from a lower rate of rejection (21.9% vs. 22.2%) but rather a differential rate of IC, 35.2% for basiliximab versus 12.5% for ATG (p = 0.011). Multivariable analysis demonstrated induction agent to be independently associated with graft survival and IC free graft survival when analyzed against variables including donor age, fWIT, donor cold ischemia time and transplant era.     

Living unrelated donors in kidney transplants: better long-term results than with non-HLA-identical living related donors?

BACKGROUND: Given the severe organ shortage and the documented superior results obtained with living (vs. cadaver) donor kidney transplants, we have adopted a very aggressive policy for the use of living donors. Currently, we make thorough attempts to locate a living related donor (LRD) or a living unrelated donor (LURD) before proceeding with a cadaver transplant. METHODS: We compared the results of our LURD versus LRD transplants to determine any significant difference in outcome. RESULTS: Between 1/1/84 and 6/30/98, we performed 711 adult kidney transplants with non-HLA-identical living donors. Of these, 595 procedures used LRDs and 116 used LURDs. Immunosuppression for both groups was cyclosporine-based, although LURD recipients received 5-7 days of induction therapy (antilymphocyte globulin or antithymocyte globulin), whereas LRD recipients did not. LURD recipients tended to be older, to have inferior HLA matching, and to have older donors than did the LRD recipients (all factors potentially associated with decreased graft survival). Short-term results, including initial graft function and incidence of acute rejection, were similar in the two groups. LURD recipients had a slightly higher incidence of cytomegalovirus disease (P=NS). We found no difference in patient and graft survival rates. However, the incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection was significantly lower among LURD recipients (16.7% for LRD recipients and 10.0% for LURD recipients at 5 years posttransplant; P=0.05). LRD recipients also had a greater incidence of late (>6 months posttransplant) acute rejection episodes than did the LURD recipients (8.6% vs. 2.6%, P=0.04). The exact reason for these findings is unknown. CONCLUSION: Although LURD recipients have poorer HLA matching and older donors, their patient and graft survival rates are equivalent to those of non-HLA-identical LRD recipients. The incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection is lower in LURD transplants. Given this finding and the superior results of living donor (vs. cadaver) transplants, a thorough search should be made for a living donor-LRD or LURD-before proceeding with a cadaver transplant.     

Whole liver versus split liver versus living donor in the adult recipient: an analysis of outcomes by graft type

BACKGROUND: We studied patient and graft survival rates in adult liver transplant recipients, analyzing outcomes based on donor source (deceased donor [DD] vs. living donor [LD]) and graft type (whole liver vs. partial liver). METHODS: A retrospective database analysis of all adult liver transpants performed at our center over a 7-year period of time. RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2005, 384 liver transplants were performed in adult recipients, either as a whole liver from a deceased donor (DD-WL, n=284), split liver from a DD (DD-SL, n=31), or a partial transplant from a living donor (LD, n=69). DD-SL transplants were performed with a full right or left lobe graft, while LD transplants used the right lobe. Demographic differences in the three groups were most noticeable for lower model for end-stage liver disease scores in LD recipients (P<0.001) and younger donor age in DD-SL recipients (P<0.001). Superior graft survival results were seen in LD recipients versus either DD-WL recipients or DD-SL recipients (P=0.02 and P=0.05, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed hepatitis C (HR=1.53, P=0.05) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HR=1.74, P=0.03) to be significant risk factors for patient survival. Hepatitis C (HR=1.61, P=0.03) and donor age more than 50 (HR=1.64, P=0.04) were significant risk factors for graft survival. However, neither graft type nor donor source were significant independent risk factors for patient or graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that the status of the recipient is probably a more important determinant of outcome than graft type or donor source.     

Transplantation of single pediatric kidneys into adult recipients

AIM: To evaluate the outcome of single pediatric kidneys transplanted into adult recipients. METHODS: A retrospective single-center review was performed of transplants from donors less than 5 years of age. Outcomes were compared with recipients of grafts from donors 18 to 45 years transplanted during the same time period. RESULTS: Thirty single renal transplants from pediatric donors and 117 transplants from adult donors between 18 and 45 years of age were performed during the study period. The mean age of the pediatric donors was 2.9 +/- 0.8 years versus 31.5 +/- 8.9 years for adult donors (P < .001). The mean age of the recipients of pediatric donors was 41.9 +/- 13 years versus 48 +/- 12.6 years for recipients of adult grafts (P = .020). The mean recipient weight of pediatric donors was 55.9 +/- 7.8 kg versus 78.0 +/- 17.7 kg for recipients of adult donors (P < .001). Sixty-six percent of pediatric donor recipients were of female gender compared to only 36% of adult donor recipients (P = .005). Death-censored actuarial graft survivals at 1 and 4 years for recipients of pediatric donor grafts were 90% and 85% compared to 93% and 85% for recipients of adult donor grafts (P = NS). The mean calculated creatinine clearances of adult donor graft recipients at 1 and 4 years posttransplantation were 70.8 +/- 26.5 and 73.7 +/- 27.2 mL/min, respectively, compared to 50.3 +/- 20.1 and 56.3 +/- 21.4 mL/min for pediatric donor grafts (P < .01 at 1 and 4 years). CONCLUSION: The use of single pediatric donor kidneys provides an excellent opportunity to safely expand the donor pool.