A 10‐year retrospective analysis of marginal bone‐level changes around implants in periodontally healthy and periodontally compromised tobacco smokers

Aim: To compare the 10‐year marginal bone loss rates around implants supporting single‐unit crowns in tobacco smokers with and without a history of treated periodontitis. Materials and methods: In this retrospective controlled study, 40 tobacco smokers were divided into four groups of 10 patients each. Two groups of periodontally compromised (PC) patients and two groups of periodontally healthy (PH) patients were established. PC patients had been treated for their periodontal conditions before implant placement. All patients were enrolled in a regular, individually tailored maintenance care program. For the rehabilitation of PC and PH patients, two different types of implants were used (Nobel Biocare AB; Straumann^® Dental Implant System). The radiographic bone loss rate was calculated by subtracting the bone levels at the time of crown delivery from the bone levels at the 10‐year follow‐up. Results: The mean age, mean full‐mouth plaque score and full‐mouth bleeding score and implant location were similar for the four groups. Implant survival rates ranged between 70% and 100%, without statistically significant differences between the four groups (P>0.05). Implants placed in PC patients yielded statistically significantly higher marginal bone loss rates compared with those in PH patients (P<0.05), independent of the implant system used. Conclusion: After 10 years, implants placed in tobacco smokers with a history of treated periodontitis and enrolled in a supportive therapy program yielded lower survival rates and higher marginal bone loss rates compared with those of implants placed in PH smokers. These outcomes were independent of the implant system installed or the healing modality applied. To cite this article:
Aglietta M, Iorio Siciliano V, Rasperini G, Cafiero C, Lang NP, Salvi GE. A 10‐year retrospective analysis of marginal bone‐level changes around implants in periodontally healthy and periodontally compromised tobacco smokers
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 47–53.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01977.x     

Ten‐year results of a three‐arm prospective cohort study on implants in periodontally compromised patients. Part 1: implant loss and radiographic bone loss

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the long‐term outcomes of implants placed in patients treated for periodontitis periodontally compromised patients (PCP) and in periodontally healthy patients (PHP) in relation to adhesion to supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Material and methods: One hundred and twelve partially edentulous patients were consecutively enrolled in private specialist practice and divided into three groups according to their initial periodontal condition: PHP, moderate PCP and severe PCP. Perio and implant treatment was carried out as needed. Solid screws (S), hollow screws (HS) and hollow cylinders (HC) were installed to support fixed prostheses, after successful completion of initial periodontal therapy (full‐mouth plaque score <25% and full‐mouth bleeding score <25%). At the end of treatment, patients were asked to follow an individualized SPT program. At 10 years, clinical measures and radiographic bone changes were recorded by two calibrated operators, blinded to the initial patient classification. Results: Eleven patients were lost to follow‐up. During the period of observation, 18 implants were removed because of biological complications. The implant survival rate was 96.6%, 92.8% and 90% for all implants and 98%, 94.2% and 90% for S‐implants only, respectively, for PHP, moderate PCP and severe PCP. The mean bone loss was 0.75 (± 0.88) mm in PHP, 1.14 (± 1.11) mm in moderate PCP and 0.98 (± 1.22) mm in severe PCP, without any statistically significant difference. The percentage of sites, with bone loss ≥3 mm, was, respectively, 4.7% for PHP, 11.2% for moderate PCP and 15.1% for severe PCP, with a statistically significant difference between PHP and severe PCP (P<0.05). Lack of adhesion to SPT was correlated with a higher incidence of bone loss and implant loss. Conclusion: Patients with a history of periodontitis presented a lower survival rate and a statistically significantly higher number of sites with peri‐implant bone loss. Furtheremore, PCP, who did not completely adhere to the SPT, were found to present a higher implant failure rate. This underlines the value of the SPT in enhancing the long‐term outcomes of implant therapy, particularly in subjects affected by periodontitis, in order to control reinfection and limit biological complications. To cite this article:
Roccuzzo M, De Angelis N, Bonino L, Aglietta M. Ten‐year results of a three arms prospective cohort study on implants in periodontally compromised patients. Part 1: implant loss and radiographic bone loss.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 490–496.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01886.x     

Long-term follow-up of turned single implants placed in periodontally healthy patients after 16-22 years: radiographic and peri-implant outcome

Objectives: Retrospectively evaluate the survival, radiographic and peri‐implant outcome of single turned Brånemark^? implants after at least 16 years. Materials and methods: From 134 patients (C‐group), 101 could be contacted concerning implant survival and 50 (59 remaining implants) were clinically examined (I‐group). Marginal bone level was radiographically measured from the implant–abutment junction at baseline (=within 6 months after abutment connection) and 1–4, 5–8 and 16–22 years post‐operatively. Probing depth, gingival and plaque index were measured. Marginal bone‐level changes were analyzed using Friedman's and Wilcoxon's signed ranks tests. Spearman's correlations between radiographic and clinical parameters were calculated. Results: In the C‐group, 13 out of 166 implants in 11 out of 134 patients failed (CSR=91.5%). In the I‐group (28 males–22 females; mean age 23.9 years at baseline; range 14–57), the mean follow‐up was 18.4 years (range 16–22). The mean bone level was 1.7±0.88 mm (range ?0.8 to 5) after 16–22 years. Changes in the mean marginal bone level were statistically significant between baseline and the second measuring interval (1–4 years). Thereafter, no significant differences could be demonstrated. The mean interproximal probing depth, gingival and plaque indices were 3.9±1.27 mm, 1.2±0.81 and 0.2±0.48, respectively. Probing depth was moderately correlated with gingival inflammation (r=0.6; P<0.001) but not with bone level (P>0.05). 81.4% of the implants had a bone level ≤2nd thread and 91.5% had a probing depth ≤5 mm. 76.3% had both bone level ≤2nd thread and probing depth ≤5 mm. Conclusions and clinical implications: The single turned Brånemark^? implant is a predictable solution with high clinical survival and success rates. In general, a steady‐state bone level can be expected over decades, with minimal signs of peri‐implant disease. A minority (5%), however, presents with progressive bone loss. To cite this article :
Dierens M, Vandeweghe S, Kisch J, Nilner K, De Bruyn H. Long‐term follow‐up of turned single implants placed in periodontally healthy patients after 16–22 years: radiographic and peri‐implant outcome.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012; 197–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02212.x     

Crestal Bone Changes at Teeth and Implants in Periodontally Healthy and Periodontally Compromised Patients. A 10‐Year Comparative Case‐Series Study

Background: Limited data exist on the longitudinal crestal bone changes around teeth compared with implants in partially edentulous patients. This study sought to compare the 10‐year radiographic crestal bone changes (bone level [BL]) around teeth and implants in periodontally compromised (PCPs) and periodontally healthy (PHPs) patients. Methods: A total of 120 patients were evaluated for the radiographic crestal BL around dental implants and adjacent teeth at time of implant crown insertion and at the 10‐year follow‐up. Sixty patients had a previous history of periodontitis (PCPs), and the remaining 60 were PHPs. In each category (PCP and PHP), two different implant systems were used. The mean BL change at the implant and at the adjacent tooth at the interproximal area was calculated by subtracting the radiographic crestal BL at the time of crown cementation from the radiographic crestal BL at the 10‐year follow‐up. Results: At 10 years after therapy, the survival rate ranged from 80% to 95% for subgroups for implants, whereas it was 100% for the adjacent teeth. In all eight different patient categories evaluated, teeth demonstrated a significantly more stable radiographic BL compared with adjacent dental implants (teeth BL, 0.44 ± 0.23 mm; implant BL, 2.28 ± 0.72 mm; P <0.05). Radiographic BL changes around teeth seemed not to be influenced by the presence or absence of advanced bone loss (≥3 mm) at the adjacent implants. Conclusions: Natural teeth yielded better long‐term results with respect to survival rate and marginal BL changes compared with dental implants. Moreover, these findings also extend to teeth with an initial reduced periodontal attachment level, provided adequate periodontal treatment and maintenance are performed. As a consequence, the decision of tooth extraction attributable to periodontal reasons in favor of a dental implant should be carefully considered in partially edentulous patients.