Antibody‐Mediated Rejection of Single Class I MHC‐Disparate Cardiac Allografts

Murine CCR5^?/? recipients produce high titers of antibody to complete MHC‐mismatched heart and renal allografts. To study mechanisms of class I MHC antibody‐mediated allograft injury, we tested the rejection of heart allografts transgenically expressing a single class I MHC disparity in wild‐type C57BL/6 (H‐2^b) and B6.CCR5^?/? recipients. Donor‐specific antibody titers in CCR5^?/? recipients were 30‐fold higher than in wild‐type recipients. B6.K^d allografts survived longer than 60 days in wild‐type recipients whereas CCR5^?/? recipients rejected all allografts within 14 days. Rejection was accompanied by infiltration of CD8 T cells, neutrophils and macrophages, and C4d deposition in the graft capillaries. B6.K^d allografts were rejected by CD8^?/?/CCR5^?/?, but not μMT^?/?/CCR5^?/?, recipients indicating the need for antibody but not CD8 T cells. Grafts recovered at day 10 from CCR5^?/? and CD8^?/?/CCR5^?/? recipients and from RAG‐1^?/? allograft recipients injected with anti‐K^d antibodies expressed high levels of perforin, myeloperoxidase and CCL5 mRNA. These studies indicate that the continual production of antidonor class I MHC antibody can mediate allograft rejection, that donor‐reactive CD8 T cells synergize with the antibody to contribute to rejection, and that expression of three biomarkers during rejection can occur in the absence of this CD8 T cell activity.     

Banff 2011 Meeting Report: New Concepts in Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

The 11th Banff meeting was held in Paris, France, from June 5 to 10, 2011, with a focus on refining diagnostic criteria for antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR). The major outcome was the acknowledgment of C4d‐negative ABMR in kidney transplants. Diagnostic criteria for ABMR have also been revisited in other types of transplants. It was recognized that ABMR is associated with heterogeneous phenotypes even within the same type of transplant. This highlights the necessity of further refining the respective diagnostic criteria, and is of particular significance for the design of randomized clinical trials. A reliable phenotyping will allow for definition of robust end‐points. To address this unmet need and to allow for an evidence‐based refinement of the Banff classification, Banff Working Groups presented multicenter data regarding the reproducibility of features relevant to the diagnosis of ABMR. However, the consensus was that more data are necessary and further Banff Working Group activities were initiated. A new Banff working group was created to define diagnostic criteria for ABMR in kidneys independent of C4d. Results are expected to be presented at the 12th Banff meeting to be held in 2013 in Brazil. No change to the Banff classification occurred in 2011.     

Microarray Diagnosis of Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Biopsies: An International Prospective Study (INTERCOM)

In a reference set of 403 kidney transplant biopsies, we recently developed a microarray‐based test that diagnoses antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR) by assigning an ABMR score. To validate the ABMR score and assess its potential impact on practice, we performed the present prospective INTERCOM study ( clinicaltrials.gov NCT01299168) in 300 new biopsies (264 patients) from six centers: Baltimore, Barcelona, Edmonton, Hannover, Manchester and Minneapolis. We assigned ABMR scores using the classifier created in the reference set and compared it to conventional assessment as documented in the pathology reports. INTERCOM documented uncertainty in conventional assessment: In 41% of biopsies where ABMR features were noted, the recorded diagnoses did not mention ABMR. The ABMR score correlated with ABMR histologic lesions and donor‐specific antibodies, but not with T cell–mediated rejection lesions. The agreement between ABMR scores and conventional assessment was identical to that in the reference set (accuracy 85%). The ABMR score was more strongly associated with failure than conventional assessment, and when the ABMR score and conventional assessment disagreed, only the ABMR score was associated with early progression to failure. INTERCOM confirms the need to reduce uncertainty in the diagnosis of ABMR, and demonstrates the potential of the ABMR score to impact practice.     

Summary of FDA Antibody‐Mediated Rejection Workshop

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) held an open public workshop in June 2010 to discuss the current state of science related to antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplantation. Desensitization, acute AMR and chronic AMR (CAMR) were considered in the context of clinical trial design. Participants discussed experiences with HLA antibody detection and quantitation and the utility of monitoring donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) to inform the management of patients with AMR. The role for animal models was discussed. Diagnostic and prognostic features of histology were presented, followed by discussion of sensitivity and specificity of various criteria. The published literature on treatment of acute AMR was summarized, which consisted of case series and limited data from controlled clinical trials. Considerations for future clinical trials were presented, including endpoints and statistical evaluations of outcome. Although many issues need further consideration, the meeting enabled an important exchange of ideas between experts in the field.     

Histopathology and Immunophenotype of the Spleen During Acute Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

Splenectomy has been reported to have a beneficial effect in treating Acute antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR). This reason for this often rapid and profound beneficial effect is not readily apparent from what is known about normal splenic immunoarchitecture. While the spleen is rich in mature B cells, it has not been noted to be a repository for direct antibody‐secreting cells. We present a case of a Native American female who received a renal transplant and developed a severe episode of ABMR. The patient was initially refractory to both plasmapheresis and IVIG. The patient underwent an emergent splenectomy with almost immediate improvement in her renal function and a rapid drop in her DR51 antibodies. Immunohistochemical stains of the spleen demonstrated abundant clusters of CD138+ plasma cells (>10% CD138 cells as opposed to 1% CD138 cells as seen in traumatic controls). Though this is a single case, these findings offer a rationale for the rapid ameliorative effect of splenectomy in cases of antibody rejection. It is possible that the spleen during times of excessive antigenic stress may rapidly turn over B cells to active antibody‐secreting cells or serve as a reservoir for these cells produced at other sites.     

Bortezomib for Acute Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in Liver Transplantation

Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) is an uncommon, but challenging type of rejection after solid organ transplantation. We review three cases of AMR in ABO‐compatible liver transplant recipients. These cases were characterized by severe acute rejection resistant to steroids and antithymocyte globulin, histologic evidence of plasma cell infiltrates, C4d positivity and high serum anti‐HLA donor‐specific antibodies. All three patients were treated with bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor effective in depleting plasma cells. After treatment, all patients had improved or normal liver function tests, resolution of C4d deposition and significant decline in their HLA donor‐specific antibodies.     

Preformed Donor HLA‐DP‐Specific Antibodies Mediate Acute and Chronic Antibody‐Mediated Rejection Following Renal Transplantation

Donor‐specific HLA alloantibodies may cause acute and chronic antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) and significantly compromise allograft survival. The clinical relevance of antibodies directed against some HLA class II antigens, particularly HLA‐DP, is less clear with conflicting reports on their pathogenicity. We report two patients with high levels of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA‐DP antibodies who subsequently developed recurrent acute AMR and graft failure. In both cases, there were no other donor‐specific HLA alloantibodies, suggesting that the HLA‐DP‐specific antibodies may be directly pathogenic.     

Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy in a Heart Transplant Recipient Following Rituximab Therapy for Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

We report the case of a male heart transplant recipient who developed acute antibody‐mediated rejection and was treated with 5 weeks of a rituximab‐containing regimen. Two months later he presented with progressive motor and cognitive impairments and was diagnosed with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). He was treated with reduction of his immunosuppressive medications, mirtazapine, IVIG and plasmapheresis. He died within weeks. We reviewed the current literature on PML and its association with immunosuppression, highlighting its impact in the setting of solid organ transplantation and considering the potential effect of newer biologic drugs on the incidence of this devastating disease in the transplant population.     

Posttransplant De Novo Donor‐Specific HLA Antibodies Identify Pediatric Kidney Recipients at Risk for Late Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

The emerging role of humoral immunity in the pathogenesis of chronic allograft damage has prompted research aimed at assessing the role of anti‐HLA antibody (Ab) monitoring as a tool to predict allograft outcome. Data on the natural history of allografts in children developing de novo Ab after transplantation are limited. Utilizing sera collected pretransplant, and serially posttransplant, we retrospectively evaluated 82 consecutive primary pediatric kidney recipients, without pretransplant donor‐specific antibodies (DSA), for de novo Ab occurrence, and compared results with clinical–pathologic data. At 4.3‐year follow up, 19 patients (23%) developed de novo DSA whereas 24 had de novo non‐DSA (NDSA, 29%). DSA appeared at a median time of 24 months after transplantation and were mostly directed to HLA‐DQ antigens. Among the 82 patients, eight developed late/chronic active C4d+ antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), and four C4d‐negative AMR. Late AMR correlated with DSA (p < 0.01), whose development preceded AMR by 1‐year median time. Patients with DSA had a median serum creatinine of 1.44 mg/dL at follow up, significantly higher than NDSA and Ab‐negative patients (p < 0.005). In our pediatric cohort, DSA identify patients at risk of renal dysfunction, AMR and graft loss; treatment started at Ab emergence might prevent AMR occurrence and/or progression to graft failure.     

Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in Pancreas Allografts—Updated Banff Grading Schema

The first Banff proposal for the diagnosis of pancreas rejection (Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 237) dealt primarily with the diagnosis of acute T‐cell‐mediated rejection (ACMR), while only tentatively addressing issues pertaining to antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR). This document presents comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis of AMR, first proposed at the 10th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology and refined by a broad‐based multidisciplinary panel. Pancreatic AMR is best identified by a combination of serological and immunohistopathological findings consisting of (i) identification of circulating donor‐specific antibodies, and histopathological data including (ii) morphological evidence of microvascular tissue injury and (iii) C4d staining in interacinar capillaries. Acute AMR is diagnosed conclusively if these three elements are present, whereas a diagnosis of suspicious for AMR is rendered if only two elements are identified. The identification of only one diagnostic element is not sufficient for the diagnosis of AMR but should prompt heightened clinical vigilance. AMR and ACMR may coexist, and should be recognized and graded independently. This proposal is based on our current knowledge of the pathogenesis of pancreas rejection and currently available tools for diagnosis. A systematized clinicopathological approach to AMR is essential for the development and assessment of much needed therapeutic interventions.     

Identifying Subphenotypes of Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplants

The key lesions in antibody‐mediated kidney transplant rejection (ABMR) are microcirculation inflammation (peritubular capillaritis and/or glomerulitis lesions, abbreviated “pg”) and glomerular double contours (cg lesions). We used these features to explore subphenotypes in 164 indication biopsies with ABMR‐related diagnoses: 137 ABMR (109 pure and 28 mixed with T cell–mediated rejection [TCMR]) and 27 transplant glomerulopathy (TG), identified from prospective multicenter studies. The lesions indicated three ABMR subphenotypes: pgABMR, cgABMR, and pgcgABMR. Principal component analysis confirmed these subphenotypes and showed that TG can be reclassified as pgcgABMR (n = 17) or cgABMR (n = 10). ABMR‐related biopsies included 45 pgABMR, 90 pgcgABMR, and 25 cgABMR, with four unclassifiable. Dominating all time intervals was the subphenotype pgcgABMR. The pgABMR subphenotype presented earliest (median <2 years), frequently mixed with TCMR, and was most associated with nonadherence. The cgABMR subphenotype presented late (median 9 years). Subphenotypes differed in their molecular changes, with pgABMR having the most histologic–molecular discrepancies (i.e. potential errors). Donor‐specific antibody (DSA) was not identified in 29% of pgcgABMR and 46% of cgABMR, but failure rates and molecular findings were similar to cases where DSA was known to be positive. Thus, ABMR presents distinct subphenotypes, early pg‐dominant, late cg‐dominant, and combined pgcg phenotype, differing in time, molecular features, accompanying TCMR, HLA antibody, and probability of nonadherence.