Effects of skeletal size of the lumbar spine on areal bone density,volumetric bone density,and the diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women in China

To understand the effects of skeletal size of the lumbar spine on areal bone mineral density (aBMD), volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), and the diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, we measured the projected bone area, bone mineral content (BMC), aBMD, and vBMD at the anteroposterior and lateral lumbar spines in a population of 1081 postmenopausal Chinese women, 42 to 86 years of age. The results indicated that, at the anteroposterior and lateral lumbar spine, there were significant positive correlations between bone area and both BMC (r = 0.606; P = 0.000 and r = 0.610; P = 0.000) and aBMD (r = 0.270; P = 0.000 and r = 0.182; P = 0.000), but not vBMD (r = –0.055; P = 0.000 and r = 0.000; P = 0.929). When bone area at the anteroposterior spine changed by ±1 SD, the BMC, aBMD, and vBMD correspondingly changed by 28.2%, 10.1%, and 1.69% on the basis of their respective means. When a variation of ±1 SD was observed in bone area at the lateral spine, BMC and aBMD, correspondingly changed by 25.9% and 6.18% on the basis of their respective means, while vBMD indicated no change. Through comparisons among large-, intermediate-, and small-bone area groups, significant differences were found in the means of subjects heights, weights, BMC, and vBMD at the anteroposterior and lateral lumbar spines, as well as in the detection rates of osteoporosis by aBMD (P = 0.000). Detection rates of osteoporosis by aBMD at the anteroposterior spine and by aBMD at the lateral spine, and by vBMD were 44.1%, 55.5%, and 49.7%, respectively, in the total population; 31.4%, 41.7%, and 53.7%, respectively, in the large-bone area group; 43.3%, 55.9%, and 50.5%, respectively, in the intermediate-bone area group; and 61.7%, 70.0%, and 42.5%, respectively, in the small-bone area group. No significant differences were found in the detection rates of osteoporosis by vBMD among the groups. The results of multiple linear regression revealed that the major factors influencing skeletal size and aBMD of the lumbar spine were height and weight. Therefore, in menopausal women of the same ethnic group and age, the skeletal size of the lumbar spine would have significant influence upon aBMD and the diagnosis of osteoporosis, i.e., the larger the spinal size, the greater the aBMD and the lower the osteoporosis detection rate, while, conversely, the smaller the skeletal size, the smaller the aBMD and the higher the osteoporosis detection rate. When we use aBMD of the lumbar spine to diagnose osteoporosis in a population with different body sizes, we need to take this body size difference into account. When we use vBMD to diagnose osteoporosis, the effect of body size on BMD will diminish.     

女性年龄相关的腰椎骨量与骨骼大小的关系及对诊断骨质疏松的影响

目的探讨腰椎骨量(面积骨密度和体积骨密度)与年龄和骨骼骨面积(BA)大小之间的关系,及腰椎骨骼大小对评价骨量和诊断骨质疏松(OP)的影响。方法采用QDR-4500A型扇形束双能X线吸收法骨密度仪,测量5585例年龄5～96岁的女性正位腰椎BA、骨矿含量(BMC)、面积骨密度(aBMD)及估算体积骨密度(vBMD)。结果腰椎aBMD和vBMD的峰值BMD(x珋±s)分别为0.9884±0.1064g/cm2和0.1310±0.0128g/cm3。在所有年龄阶段aBMD随年龄的变化率显著大于vBMD。腰椎BA与BMC、aBMD和vBMD均呈显著正相关,其中BA与BMC的相关系数最大(r=0.706,P=0.000),与aBMD的相关系数次之(r=0.394,P=0.000),与vBMD的相关系数最小(r=0.141,P=0.000)。年龄≥40岁(平均52.7±9.58岁)的受试者(n=4012)腰椎BA按四分位数分成Q1、Q2、Q3和Q4组,4个组之间的BA、BMC和aBMD的平均值均有显著性差异。采用aBMD诊断OP,4个组的OP检出率分别为Q1=33.6%、Q2=17.9%、Q3=13.3%和Q4=8.39%,呈显著性梯次降低;与总体组比较,Q1组的患病风险增加126%,Q2、Q3和Q4组的患病风险分别降低3%、31%和59%。采用vBMD诊断OP,4个组的OP检出率分别为Q1=27.4%、Q2=18.3%、Q3=15.9%和Q4=14.0%,其梯次差异显著低于aBMD;与总体组比较,Q1组的患病风险增加62%,Q2、Q3和Q4组的患病风险分别降低4%、19%和30%。Q1组aBMD的OP检出率显著高于vBMD,Q4组aBMD的OP检出率显著低于vBMD。在椎体最小的Q1组,aBMD(OR=2.26)的患病风险比vBMD(OR=1.62)大约高64%,在椎体最大的Q4组,aBMD(OR=0.41)的患病风险比vBMD(OR=0.70)大约低29%。结论该研究揭示腰椎vBMD并不能完全消除骨骼大小对评价骨量和诊断OP的影响。在腰椎椎体较小的受试者,aBMD诊断OP的敏感性高于vBMD;在椎体较大的受试者,vBMD诊断OP的敏感性则高于aBMD。     

Bone density,geometry, microstructure,and stiffness: Relationships between peripheral and central skeletal sites assessed by DXA,HR‐pQCT,and cQCT in premenopausal women

High‐resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR‐pQCT) is a new in vivo imaging technique for assessing 3D microstructure of cortical and trabecular bone at the distal radius and tibia. No studies have investigated the extent to which measurements of the peripheral skeleton by HR‐pQCT reflect those of the spine and hip, where the most serious fractures occur. To address this research question, we performed dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA), central QCT (cQCT), HR‐pQCT, and image‐based finite‐element analyses on 69 premenopausal women to evaluate relationships among cortical and trabecular bone density, geometry, microstructure, and stiffness of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, distal radius, and distal tibia. Significant correlations were found between the stiffness of the two peripheral sites (r = 0.86), two central sites (r = 0.49), and between the peripheral and central skeletal sites (r = 0.56–0.70). These associations were explained in part by significant correlations in areal bone mineral density (aBMD), volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), and cross‐sectional area (CSA) between the multiple skeletal sites. For the prediction of proximal femoral stiffness, vBMD (r = 0.75) and stiffness (r = 0.69) of the distal tibia by HR‐pQCT were comparable with direct measurements of the proximal femur: aBMD of the hip by DXA (r = 0.70) and vBMD of the hip by cQCT (r = 0.64). For the prediction of vertebral stiffness, trabecular vBMD (r = 0.58) and stiffness (r = 0.70) of distal radius by HR‐pQCT were comparable with direct measurements of lumbar spine: aBMD by DXA (r = 0.78) and vBMD by cQCT (r = 0.67). Our results suggest that bone density and microstructural and mechanical properties measured by HR‐pQCT of the distal radius and tibia reflect the mechanical competence of the central skeleton. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Pubertal bone growth in the femoral neck is predominantly characterized by increased bone size and not by increased bone density—a 4-year longitudinal study

Fragility fractures are correlated to reduced bone size and/or reduced volumetric bone density (vBMD). These region-specific deficits may originate from reduced mineral accrual and/or reduced skeletal growth during the first 2 decades of life. Before pathological development can be defined, normal skeletal growth must be described. To evaluate growth of bone size, accrual of bone mineral content (BMC), areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and vBMD in a population-based cohort, 44 boys and 42 girls were followed by annual measurements from the age of 12 to 16 (attendance rates 90-100%). Segmental bone length, bone width, BMC, aBMD and vBMD were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data were compared with predicted adult peak, as determined in 36 men aged 27.7+/-4.6 years and 44 women aged 26.8+/-4.9 years. Growth in width of the femoral neck precedes accrual of BMC in the femoral neck in both genders up to age 15. The girls were at all ages closer to their predicted adult peak in both bone width and BMC compared with the boys except in the femoral neck. As femoral neck vBMD had reached its predicted adult peak already at 12 years in both genders, the increase in femoral neck BMC and femoral neck aBMD from age 12 to 16 was most likely to be explained by the increase in bone size. In boys the peak velocity growth was recorded at ~14 years for BMC, height, width and lean mass. Growth from the age of 12 to 16 seems to build a bigger but not a denser skeleton in the femoral neck.     

Frame size, ethnicity, lifestyle, and biologic contributors to areal and volumetric lumbar spine bone mineral density in Indian/Pakistani and American Caucasian premenopausal women.

Published data on the spinal bone mineral density (BMD) of premenopausal women originating from the Indian subcontinent (Indian/Pakistani) are few. We compared anteroposterior (AP) and lateral areal BMD (aBMD) using dual X-ray absorptiometry and calculated volumetric BMD (vBMD) in Indian/Pakistani (n = 47) vs American (n = 47) women with dissimilar statures and skeletal sizes. To account for differences, we "adjusted" lumbar aBMD separately for vertebral size (aBMD/the square root of the projected area), height (aBMD/height), and hip skeletal width (aBMD/hip width). We "corrected" bone mineral content (BMC), aBMD, and vBMD for frame size, collectively using height, hip width, and vertebral size. Unadjusted mean aBMD values for AP lumbar (L1-L4, p = 0.0086; L3-L4, p = 0.044) spine were higher in Americans than Indians/Pakistanis,whereas lateral vBMD (p = 0.56) or aBMD (p = 0.060) values were not different. After adjusting for height, hip width, or vertebral size, or correcting for frame size, differences in aBMD disappeared. Regression analyses indicated that the best measures to correct for frame size were: vertebral area for BMC, hip width for aBMD, and vertebral width for lateral vBMD. Height was not significant in any model. In correcting for frame size, we accounted for 73-85% of the variability in BMC, 22-28% in aBMD, and 27% in lateral vBMD. After frame size was corrected, we accounted for 34% of the variability in AP BMC and aBMD, in contrast with 6-9% in the lateral models. Five significant biologic and lifestyle factors remained in AP models; only body weight remained for lateral spine. Upon accounting for frame size using regression, much variability in BMD, aBMD, and vBMD was explained by lifestyle and biologic factors, not by ethnicity.     

Catch up in bone acquisition in young adult men with late normal puberty

The aim of this study was to investigate the development of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) in relation to peak height velocity (PHV), and to investigate whether late normal puberty was associated with remaining low BMD and BMC in early adulthood in men. In total, 501 men (mean ± SD, 18.9 ± 0.5 years of age at baseline) were included in this 5‐year longitudinal study. Areal BMD (aBMD) and BMC, volumetric BMD (vBMD) and cortical bone size were measured using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) and pQCT. Detailed growth and weight charts were used to calculate age at PHV, an objective assessment of pubertal timing. Age at PHV was a strong positive predictor of the increase in aBMD and BMC of the total body (R² aBMD 11.7%; BMC 4.3%), radius (R² aBMD 23.5%; BMC 22.3%), and lumbar spine (R² aBMD 11.9%; BMC 10.5%) between 19 and 24 years (p < 0.001). Subjects were divided into three groups according to age at PHV (early, middle, and late). Men with late puberty gained markedly more in aBMD and BMC at the total body, radius, and lumbar spine, and lost less at the femoral neck (p < 0.001) than men with early puberty. At age 24 years, no significant differences in aBMD or BMC of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total body were observed, whereas a deficit of 4.2% in radius aBMD, but not in BMC, was seen for men with late versus early puberty (p < 0.001). pQCT measurements of the radius at follow‐up demonstrated no significant differences in bone size, whereas cortical and trabecular vBMD were 0.7% (p < 0.001) and 4.8% (p < 0.05) lower in men with late versus early puberty. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that late puberty in males was associated with a substantial catch up in aBMD and BMC in young adulthood, leaving no deficits of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total body at age 24 years. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Increased physical activity is associated with enhanced development of peak bone mass in men: a five-year longitudinal study

Data supporting physical activity guidelines to optimize bone development in men is sparse. Peak bone mass is believed to be important for the risk of osteoporosis later in life. The objective of this study was to determine if an increased amount of physical activity over a 5‐year period was associated with increased bone mineral content (BMC), areal (aBMD) and volumetric (vBMD) bone mineral density, and a favorable development of cortical bone size in young adult men. The original 1068 young men, initially enrolled in the Gothenburg Osteoporosis and Obesity Determinants (GOOD) study, were invited to participate in the longitudinal study, and a total of 833 men (78%), 24.1 ± 0.6 years of age, were included in the 5‐year follow‐up. A standardized self‐administered questionnaire was used to collect information about patterns of physical activity at both the baseline and 5‐year follow‐up visits. BMC and aBMD were measured using dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry, whereas vBMD and bone geometry were measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Increased physical activity between the baseline and follow‐up visits was associated with a favorable development in BMC of the total body, and aBMD of the lumbar spine and total hip (p < 0.001), as well as with development of a larger cortex (cortical cross sectional area), and a denser trabecular bone of the tibia (p < 0.001). In conclusion, increased physical activity was related to an advantageous development of aBMD, trabecular vBMD and cortical bone size, indicating that exercise is important in optimizing peak bone mass in young men. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Odanacatib Treatment Affects Trabecular and Cortical Bone in the Femur of Postmenopausal Women: Results of a Two‐Year Placebo‐Controlled Trial

Odanacatib, a selective cathepsin K inhibitor, increases areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the spine and hip of postmenopausal women. To gain additional insight into the effects on trabecular and cortical bone, we analyzed quantitative computed tomography (QCT) data of postmenopausal women treated with odanacatib using Medical Image Analysis Framework (MIAF; Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany). This international, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, 2‐year, phase 3 trial enrolled 214 postmenopausal women (mean age 64 years) with low aBMD. Subjects were randomized to odanacatib 50 mg weekly (ODN) or placebo (PBO); all participants received calcium and vitamin D. Hip QCT scans at 24 months were available for 158 women (ODN: n = 78 women; PBO: n = 80 women). There were consistent and significant differential treatment effects (ODN‐PBO) for total hip integral (5.4%), trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) (12.2%), and cortical vBMD (2.5%) at 24 months. There was no significant differential treatment effect on integral bone volume. Results for bone mineral content (BMC) closely matched those for vBMD for integral and trabecular compartments. However, with small but mostly significant differential increases in cortical volume (1.0% to 1.3%) and thickness (1.4% to 1.9%), the percentage cortical BMC increases were numerically larger than those of vBMD. With a total hip BMC differential treatment effect (ODN‐PBO) of nearly 1000 mg, the proportions of BMC attributed to cortical gain were 45%, 44%, 52%, and 40% for the total, neck, trochanter, and intertrochanter subregions, respectively. In postmenopausal women treated for 2 years, odanacatib improved integral, trabecular, and cortical vBMD and BMC at all femur regions relative to placebo when assessed by MIAF. Cortical volume and thickness increased significantly in all regions except the femoral neck. The increase in cortical volume and BMC paralleled the increase in cortical vBMD, demonstrating a consistent effect of ODN on cortical bone. Approximately one‐half of the absolute BMC gain occurred in cortical bone. © 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume

Biomechanical studies of the thoracic spine often scan cadaveric segments by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to obtain measures of bone mass. Only one study has reported the accuracy of lateral scans of thoracic vertebral bodies. The accuracy of DXA scans of thoracic spine segments and of anterior-posterior (AP) thoracic scans has not been investigated. We have examined the accuracy of AP and lateral thoracic DXA scans by comparison with ash weight, the gold-standard for measuring bone mineral content (BMC). We have also compared three methods of estimating volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) with a novel standard–ash weight (g)/bone volume (cm³) as measured by computed tomography (CT). Twelve T5–T8 spine segments were scanned with DXA (AP and lateral) and CT. The T6 vertebrae were excised, the posterior elements removed and then the vertebral bodies were ashed in a muffle furnace. We proposed a new method of estimating vBMD and compared it with two previously published methods. BMC values from lateral DXA scans displayed the strongest correlation with ash weight (r=0.99) and were on average 12.8% higher (p<0.001). As expected, BMC (AP or lateral) was more strongly correlated with ash weight than areal bone mineral density (aBMD; AP: r=0.54, or lateral: r=0.71) or estimated vBMD. Estimates of vBMD with either of the three methods were strongly and similarly correlated with volumetric BMD calculated by dividing ash weight by CT-derived volume. These data suggest that readily available DXA scanning is an appropriate surrogate measure for thoracic spine bone mineral and that the lateral scan might be the scan method of choice.     

Identification of genes influencing skeletal phenotypes in congenic P/NP rats

We previously showed that alcohol‐preferring (P) rats have higher bone density than alcohol‐nonpreferring (NP) rats. Genetic mapping in P and NP rats identified a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) between 4q22 and 4q34 for alcohol preference. At the same location, several QTLs linked to bone density and structure were detected in Fischer 344 (F344) and Lewis (LEW) rats, suggesting that bone mass and strength genes might cosegregate with genes that regulate alcohol preference. The aim of this study was to identify the genes segregating for skeletal phenotypes in congenic P and NP rats. Transfer of the NP chromosome 4 QTL into the P background (P.NP) significantly decreased areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) at several skeletal sites, whereas transfer of the P chromosome 4 QTL into the NP background (NP.P) significantly increased bone mineral content (BMC) and aBMD in the same skeletal sites. Microarray analysis from the femurs using Affymetrix Rat Genome arrays revealed 53 genes that were differentially expressed among the rat strains with a false discovery rate (FDR) of less than 10%. Nine candidate genes were found to be strongly correlated (r² > 0.50) with bone mass at multiple skeletal sites. The top three candidate genes, neuropeptide Y (Npy), α synuclein (Snca), and sepiapterin reductase (Spr), were confirmed using real‐time quantitative PCR (qPCR). Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed relationships among the candidate genes related to bone metabolism involving β‐estradiol, interferon‐γ, and a voltage‐gated calcium channel. We identified several candidate genes, including some novel genes on chromosome 4 segregating for skeletal phenotypes in reciprocal congenic P and NP rats. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research     

Vertebral Size,Bone Density,and Strength in Men and Women Matched for Age and Areal Spine BMD

To explore the possible mechanisms underlying sex‐specific differences in skeletal fragility that may be obscured by two‐dimensional areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measures, we compared quantitative computed tomography (QCT)‐based vertebral bone measures among pairs of men and women from the Framingham Heart Study Multidetector Computed Tomography Study who were matched for age and spine aBMD. Measurements included vertebral body cross‐sectional area (CSA, cm²), trabecular volumetric BMD (Tb.vBMD, g/cm³), integral volumetric BMD (Int.vBMD, g/cm³), estimated vertebral compressive loading and strength (Newtons) at L₃, the factor‐of‐risk (load‐to‐strength ratio), and vertebral fracture prevalence. We identified 981 male‐female pairs (1:1 matching) matched on age (± 1 year) and QCT‐derived aBMD of L₃ (± 1%), with an average age of 51 years (range 34 to 81 years). Matched for aBMD and age, men had 20% larger vertebral CSA, lower Int.vBMD (–8%) and Tb.vBMD (–9%), 10% greater vertebral compressive strength, 24% greater vertebral compressive loading, and 12% greater factor‐of‐risk than women (p < 0.0001 for all), as well as higher prevalence of vertebral fracture. After adjusting for height and weight, the differences in CSA and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) between men and women were attenuated but remained significant, whereas compressive strength was no longer different. In conclusion, vertebral size, morphology, and density differ significantly between men and women matched for age and spine aBMD, suggesting that men and women attain the same aBMD by different mechanisms. These results provide novel information regarding sex‐specific differences in mechanisms that underlie vertebral fragility. © 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Trabecular volumetric bone mineral density is associated with previous fracture during childhood and adolescence in males: The GOOD study

Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measured with dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been associated with fracture risk in children and adolescents, but it remains unclear whether this association is due to volumetric BMD (vBMD) of the cortical and/or trabecular bone compartments or bone size. The aim of this study was to determine whether vBMD or bone size was associated with X‐ray‐verified fractures in men during growth. In total, 1068 men (aged 18.9 ± 0.6 years) were included in the population‐based Gothenburg Osteoporosis and Obesity Determinants (GOOD) Study. Areal BMD was measured by DXA, whereas cortical and trabecular vBMD and bone size were measured by peripheral quantitative computerized tomography (pQCT). X‐ray records were searched for fractures. Self‐reported fractures in 77 men could not be confirmed in these records. These men were excluded, resulting in 991 included men, of which 304 men had an X‐ray‐verified fracture and 687 were nonfracture subjects. Growth charts were used to establish the age of peak height velocity (PHV, n = 600). Men with prevalent fractures had lower aBMD (lumbar spine 2.3%, p = .005; total femur 2.6%, p = .004, radius 2.1%, p < .001) at all measured sites than men without fracture. Using pQCT measurements, we found that men with a prevalent fracture had markedly lower trabecular vBMD (radius 6.6%, p = 7.5 × 10^?8; tibia 4.5%, p = 1.7 × 10^?7) as well as a slightly lower cortical vBMD (radius 0.4%, p = .0012; tibia 0.3%, p = .015) but not reduced cortical cross‐sectional area than men without fracture. Every SD decrease in trabecular vBMD of the radius and tibia was associated with 1.46 [radius 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26–1.69; tibia 95% CI 1.26–1.68] times increased fracture prevalence. The peak fracture incidence coincided with the timing of PHV (±1 year). In conclusion, trabecular vBMD but not aBMD was independently associated with prevalent X‐ray‐verified fractures in young men. Further studies are needed to determine if assessment of trabecular vBMD could enhance prediction of fractures during growth in males. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research     

Relation of serum serotonin levels to bone density and structural parameters in women

Recent studies have demonstrated an important role for circulating serotonin in regulating bone mass in rodents. In addition, patients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have reduced areal bone mineral density (aBMD). However, the potential physiologic role of serotonin in regulating bone mass in humans remains unclear. Thus we measured serum serotonin levels in a population‐based sample of 275 women and related these to total‐body and spine aBMD assessed by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry, femur neck total and trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) and vertebral trabecular vBMD assessed by quantitative computed tomography (QCT), and bone microstructural parameters at the distal radius assessed by high‐resolution peripheral QCT (HRpQCT). Serotonin levels were inversely associated with body and spine aBMD (age‐adjusted R = ?0.17 and ?0.16, P < .01, respectively) and with femur neck total and trabecular vBMD (age‐adjusted R = ?0.17 and ?0.25, P < .01 and < .001, respectively) but not lumbar spine vBMD. Bone volume/tissue volume, trabecular number, and trabecular thickness at the radius were inversely associated with serotonin levels (age‐adjusted R = ?0.16, ?0.16, and ?0.14, P < .05, respectively). Serotonin levels also were inversely associated with body mass index (BMI; age‐adjusted R = ?0.23, P < .001). Multivariable models showed that serotonin levels remained significant negative predictors of femur neck total and trabecular vBMD, as well as trabecular thickness at the radius, after adjusting for age and BMI. Collectively, our data provide support for a physiologic role for circulating serotonin in regulating bone mass in humans. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research     

Reproducibility of Volume-Adjusted Bone Mineral Density of Spine and Hip from Dual X-ray Absorptiometry

Skeletal size has a confounding effect on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) related to differences in skeletal volume. Several methods have been proposed for calculating volumetric BMD (vBMD), but in vivo precision data are limited for the spine and have not been published for the hip. We prospectively performed duplicate dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the anteroposterior spine and hip (n = 121) in a diverse female population referred for initial clinical BMD testing. Each scan pair was performed and analyzed by two different technologists (mean interval of 4 d) to obtain standard aBMD. Scan data were reprocessed at a later date to calculate vBMD for the lumbar spine (L2-L4), femoral neck, and total hip in the 87 spines and 82 hips for which we had complete analyzable scan data. We found much worse precision in femoral neck volume (5.2% coefficient of variation [CV]) than in spine volume (2.6% CV; p < 0.003). This contributed to greater error in femoral neck vBMD (3.9% CV) than aBMD (2.3= CV; p < 10(-6)). Total hip aBMD had better precision than vBMD (1.0 and 1.3-2.5% CV; p < 10(-5)). The reverse pattern was seen in the spine with slightly better precision for vBMD than aBMD (1.1 and 1.5% CV; p < 0.002). Volumetric measures of lumbar spine density can be obtained with high precision. Because of poor reproducibility in the femoral neck, the total hip region may be preferable for measuring volumetric bone density in the proximal femur.     

Gender differences in volumetric bone density: a study of opposite-sex twins

Gender difference in bone size is a potential confounder when comparing bone density between males and females. A comparison of volumetric BMD (vBMD) between men and women, which is a measure of bone mass relative to three-dimensional bone volume (g/cm³) as opposed to areal bone density (g/cm²), may be a more accurate reflection of gender differences in bone density. The aims of this study were to examine gender differences in bone mass (BMC), areal BMD (aBMD), volumetric BMD (vBMD) by comparing twins of opposite sex in whom the effects of age, genes and environment are partially controlled for. DEXA derived BMC, aBMD, vBMD at the third lumbar vertebra (L3), femoral neck (FN) and forearm (1/3 radius) were compared between 82 opposite sex pairs aged 18–80. BMC was significantly higher in males at all three sites (26–45.5%). For aBMD the gender differences remained significant at all sites except the spine. The average differences in aBMD were not as great as the differences in BMC (2.2–20.5%). The differences in vBMD, however, followed a different pattern. FN and L3 vBMD were significantly higher in females (4.8 and 0.6%, respectively), while radial BMD was not significantly different between the sexes. Comparing aBMD values between males and females, when females in general have a smaller skeleton than males may not be a true indication of gender differences in bone density. A comparison of vBMD between men and women shows only small differences in bone density between the sexes.     

Bone mineral content and density of the lumbar spine of infants and toddlers: Influence of age,sex, race,growth, and human milk feeding

Little is known about factors that affect bone mass and density of infants and toddlers and the means to assess their bone health owing to challenges in studying this population. The objectives of this study were to describe age, sex, race, growth, and human milk feeding effects on bone mineral content (BMC) and areal density (aBMD) of the lumbar spine, and determine precision of BMC and aBMD measurements. We conducted a cross‐sectional study of 307 healthy participants (63 black), ages 1 to 36 months. BMC and aBMD of the lumbar spine were measured by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Duplicate scans were obtained on 76 participants for precision determination. Age‐specific Z‐scores for aBMD, weight, and length (BMDZ, WAZ, LAZ) were calculated. Information on human milk feeding duration was ascertained by questionnaire. Between ages 1 and 36 months, lumbar spine BMC increased about fivefold and aBMD increased twofold (p < 0.0001). BMC was greater (5.8%) in males than in females (p = 0.001), but there was no difference in aBMD (p = 0.37). There was no difference in BMC or aBMD between whites and blacks (p ≥ 0.16). WAZ and LAZ were positively associated with BMDZ (r = 0.34 and 0.24, p < 0.001). Duration of human milk feeding was negatively associated with BMDZ in infants <12 months of age (r = ?0.42, p < 0.001). Precision of BMC and aBMD measurements was good, 2.20% and 1.84%, respectively. Dramatic increases in BMC and aBMD of the lumbar spine occur in the first 36 months of life. We provide age‐specific values for aBMD of healthy infants and toddlers that can be used to evaluate bone deficits. Future studies are needed to identify the age when sex and race differences in aBMD occur, and how best to account for delayed or accelerated growth in the context of bone health assessment of infants and toddlers. © 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research     

Trabecular Bone Score has Poor Association With pQCT Derived Trabecular Bone Density in Indian Children With Type 1 Diabetes and Healthy Controls

Background: In children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), low trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (Trab vBMD) has been reported. However, studies using the trabecular bone score (TBS) are scarce. The objective of our study was to assess areal bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (LS aBMD), the TBS and Trab vBMD in children with type 1 diabetes in comparison with healthy controls and to assess the relationship of Trab vBMD with TBS.Methods: A total of 205 children were assessed for their LS bone mineral content (BMC) and LS aBMD by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and Trab vBMD at distal radius by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Machine generated Z-scores for both LS aBMD and Trab vBMD were used. The retrospective DXA LS scans in children with T1DM (n=137, age 13.1 ± 3.2 years) and controls (n = 68, age 13.0 ± 2.7 years) were analysed with a research trial version of TBS iNsight software (Medimaps Group). The established TBS cut-offs were used to categorize TBS.Results: The mean LS BMC, LS aBMD, TBS and Trab vBMDs were lower in children with T1DM. TBS was positively correlated with LS aBMD but not with Trab vBMD in both groups. Distribution of T1DM and control children was similar in the TBS categories. Over a fourth of the T1DM children with low Trab vBMD (below -2 Z score) had normal TBS, while, in children with LS aBMD Z-score > -2 from both groups, >50% had degraded or partially degraded TBS. Degraded TBS was seen in half the control children although none of them had low Trab vBMD.Conclusion: We found poor correlation between TBS and Trab vBMD in paediatric diabetic and healthy population. Our results also suggest establishing paediatric TBS cut offs in improving the classification of children having degraded trabecular bone.     

Physical activity increases bone size in prepubertal boys and bone mass in prepubertal girls: a combined cross-sectional and 3-year longitudinal study

This study evaluates the effect on the skeleton of physical activity from age 9 to 16. In 42 girls and 44 boys, bone mass and bone size were evaluated longitudinally by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) from ages 13 to 16. Physical activity from ages 9 to 13 was cross-sectionally evaluated at baseline (age 13). Girls with high physical activity from ages 9 to 13 at baseline had higher femoral neck bone mineral content (FN BMC; g) (P = 0.07), higher FN areal bone mineral density (FN aBMD; g/cm2), and higher FN volumetric BMD (FN vBMD; g/cm3) (both P < 0.05) compared with girls of low activity. FN width (cm) and head aBMD (an unloaded region) showed no differences when comparing the two groups. Three years of further high and low activity (from ages 13 to 16) did not yield any increased differences between the two groups. Boys with high physical activity from ages 9 to 13, had at baseline higher FN BMC, FN aBMD, and FN width (all P < 0.05) compared with boys with low activity. FN vBMD and head aBMD showed no differences when comparing the two groups. Three years of further high and low activity did not yield any increased differences between the two groups. We conclude that exercise may yield skeletal benefits before age 13, and that 3 years of continued high or low level activity up to age 16 did not yield any increased differences in bone size or bone mass in either girls or boys.     

Differences in skeletal microarchitecture and strength in African‐American and white women

African‐American women have a lower risk of fracture than white women, and this difference is only partially explained by differences in dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) areal bone mineral density (aBMD). Little is known about racial differences in skeletal microarchitecture and the consequences for bone strength. To evaluate potential factors underlying this racial difference in fracture rates, we used high‐resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR‐pQCT) to assess cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture and estimate bone strength using micro–finite element analysis (µFEA) in African‐American (n = 100) and white (n = 173) women participating in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). African‐American women had larger and denser bones than whites, with greater total area, aBMD, and total volumetric BMD (vBMD) at the radius and tibia metaphysis (p < 0.05 for all). African‐Americans had greater trabecular vBMD at the radius, but higher cortical vBMD at the tibia. Cortical microarchitecture tended to show the most pronounced racial differences, with higher cortical area, thickness, and volumes in African‐Americans at both skeletal sites (p < 0.05 for all), and lower cortical porosity in African‐Americans at the tibia (p < 0.05). African‐American women also had greater estimated bone stiffness and failure load at both the radius and tibia. Differences in skeletal microarchitecture and estimated stiffness and failure load persisted even after adjustment for DXA aBMD. The densitometric and microarchitectural predictors of failure load at the radius and tibia were the same in African‐American and white women. In conclusion, differences in bone microarchitecture and density contribute to greater estimated bone strength in African‐Americans and probably explain, at least in part, the lower fracture risk of African‐American women. © 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.