Three‐Year Outcomes From BENEFIT‐EXT: A Phase III Study of Belatacept Versus Cyclosporine in Recipients of Extended Criteria Donor Kidneys

Recipients of extended‐criteria donor (ECD) kidneys have poorer long‐term outcomes compared to standard‐criteria donor kidney recipients. We report 3‐year outcomes from a randomized, phase III study in recipients of de novo ECD kidneys (n = 543) assigned (1:1:1) to either a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) belatacept regimen, or cyclosporine. Three hundred twenty‐three patients completed treatment by year 3. Patient survival with a functioning graft was comparable between groups (80% in MI, 82% in LI, 80% in cyclosporine). Mean calculated GFR (cGFR) was 11 mL/min higher in belatacept‐treated versus cyclosporine‐treated patients (42.7 in MI, 42.2 in LI, 31.5 mL/min in cyclosporine). More cyclosporine‐treated patients (44%) progressed to GFR <30 mL/min (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 4/5) than belatacept‐treated patients (27–30%). Acute rejection rates were similar between groups. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurrence was higher in belatacept‐treated patients (two in MI, three in LI), most of which occurred during the first 18 months; four additional cases (3 in LI, 1 in cyclosporine) occurred after 3 years. Tuberculosis was reported in two MI, four LI and no cyclosporine patients. In conclusion, at 3 years after transplantation, immunosuppression with belatacept resulted in similar patient survival, graft survival and acute rejection, with better renal function compared with cyclosporine. As previously reported, PTLD and tuberculosis were the principal safety findings associated with belatacept in this study population.     

Immunosuppression with Belatacept‐Based,Corticosteroid‐Avoiding Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Current immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation typically include calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids, both of which have toxicities that can impair recipient and allograft health. This 1‐year, randomized, controlled, open‐label, exploratory study assessed two belatacept‐based regimens compared to a tacrolimus (TAC)‐based, steroid‐avoiding regimen. Recipients of living and deceased donor renal allografts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive belatacept‐mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), belatacept‐sirolimus (SRL), or TAC‐MMF. All patients received induction with 4 doses of Thymoglobulin (6 mg/kg maximum) and an associated short course of corticosteroids. Eighty‐nine patients were randomized and transplanted. Acute rejection occurred in 4, 1 and 1 patient in the belatacept‐MMF, belatacept‐SRL and TAC‐MMF groups, respectively, by Month 6; most acute rejection occurred in the first 3 months. More than two‐thirds of patients in the belatacept groups remained on CNI‐ and steroid‐free regimens at 12 months and the calculated glomerular filtration rate was 8–10 mL/min higher with either belatacept regimen than with TAC‐MMF. Overall safety was comparable between groups. In conclusion, primary immunosuppression with belatacept may enable the simultaneous avoidance of both CNIs and corticosteroids in recipients of living and deceased standard criteria donor kidneys, with acceptable rates of acute rejection and improved renal function relative to a TAC‐based regimen.     

A Phase III Study of Belatacept Versus Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplants from Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT‐EXT Study)

Recipients of extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are at increased risk for graft dysfunction/loss, and may benefit from immunosuppression that avoids calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. Belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker, may preserve renal function and improve long‐term outcomes versus CNIs. BENEFIT‐EXT (Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First‐line Immunosuppression Trial—EXTended criteria donors) is a 3‐year, Phase III study that assessed a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept versus cyclosporine in adult ECD kidney transplant recipients. The coprimary endpoints at 12 months were composite patient/graft survival and a composite renal impairment endpoint. Patient/graft survival with belatacept was similar to cyclosporine (86% MI, 89% LI, 85% cyclosporine) at 12 months. Fewer belatacept patients reached the composite renal impairment endpoint versus cyclosporine (71% MI, 77% LI, 85% cyclosporine; p = 0.002 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.06 LI vs. cyclosporine). The mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 4–7 mL/min higher on belatacept versus cyclosporine (p = 0.008 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.1039 LI vs. cyclosporine), and the overall cardiovascular/metabolic profile was better on belatacept versus cyclosporine. The incidence of acute rejection was similar across groups (18% MI; 18% LI; 14% cyclosporine). Overall rates of infection and malignancy were similar between groups; however, more cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurred in the CNS on belatacept. ECD kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept‐based immunosuppression achieved similar patient/graft survival, better renal function, had an increased incidence of PTLD, and exhibited improvement in the cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus cyclosporine‐treated patients.     

环孢素A血药浓度监测的临床意义

目的：探讨环孢素A(CsA)血药谷值浓度监测的临床意义。方法：对269例同种肾移植受者术后4081次CsA血药谷值浓度进行了分析。结果：随着移植肾存活时间的延长,CsA治疗浓度水平呈逐渐下降趋势。排斥反应发生时及排斥反应前两周内,CsA浓度不仅低下,而且有一持续约2周的显著下降过程,平均降幅达31％。术后一周内急性排斥反应的发生与CsA浓度关系不大。过高的CsA浓度则与肾中毒’反应有关。CsA治疗浓度与发生排斥反应时的浓度及肾中毒浓度均有一定程度的重叠。结论：认为术后CsA理想的治疗窗浓度应为：术后第1月内为300-450ng／ml,3月内为250～400ng／ml,半年内为200～350ng／ml,以后CsA浓度最好维持在150～250ng／ml。     

Long‐Term Exposure to Belatacept in Recipients of Extended Criteria Donor Kidneys

Patients in the BENEFIT‐EXT study received extended criteria donor kidneys and a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) belatacept immunosuppression regimen, or cyclosporine A (CsA). Patients who remained on assigned therapy through year 3 were eligible to enter a long‐term extension (LTE) study. Three hundred four patients entered the LTE (n = 104 MI; n = 113 LI; n = 87 CsA), and 260 continued treatment through year 5 (n = 91 MI; n = 100 LI; n = 69 CsA). Twenty patients died during the LTE (n = 5 MI; n = 9 LI; n = 6 CsA), and eight experienced graft loss (n = 2 MI; n = 1 LI; n = 5 CsA). Three patients experienced an acute rejection episode (n = 2 MI; n = 1 LI). The incidence rate of serious adverse events, viral infections and fungal infections was similar across groups during the LTE. There were four cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) from the beginning of the LTE to year 5 (n = 3 LI; n = 1 CsA); two of three PTLD cases in the LI group were in patients who were seronegative for Epstein–Barr virus (EBV(?)) at transplantation. Mean ± SD calculated GFR at year 5 was 55.9 ± 17.5 (MI), 59.0 ± 29.1 (LI) and 44.6 ± 16.4 (CsA) mL/min/1.73 m². Continued treatment with belatacept was associated with a consistent safety profile and sustained improvement in renal function versus CsA over time.

     

Long‐Term Belatacept Exposure Maintains Efficacy and Safety at 5 Years: Results From the Long‐Term Extension of the BENEFIT Study

The Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First‐line Immunosuppression Trial randomized patients receiving a living or standard criteria deceased donor kidney transplant to a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept or cyclosporine A (CsA). The 5‐year results of the long‐term extension (LTE) cohort are reported. A total of 456 (68.5% of intent‐to‐treat) patients entered the LTE at 36 months; 406 patients (89%) completed 60 months. Between Months 36 and 60, death occurred in 2%, 1% and 5% of belatacept MI, belatacept LI and CsA patients, respectively; graft loss occurred in 0% belatacept and 2% of CsA patients. Acute rejection between Months 36 and 60 was rare: zero belatacept MI, one belatacept LI and one CsA. Rates for infections and malignancies for Months 36–60 were generally similar across belatacept groups and CsA, respectively: fungal infections (14%, 15%, 12%), viral infections (21%, 18%, 16%) and malignancies (6%, 6%, 9%). No new posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder cases occurred after 36 months. Mean calculated GFR (MDRD, mL/min/1.73 m²) at Month 60 was 74 for belatacept MI, 76 for belatacept LI and 53 for CsA. These results show that the renal function benefit and safety profile observed in belatacept‐treated patients in the early posttransplant period was sustained through 5 years.     

Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT, a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study in adult kidney transplant recipients

The clinical profile of belatacept in kidney transplant recipients was evaluated to determine if earlier results in the BENEFIT study were sustained at 3 years. BENEFIT is a randomized 3 year, phase III study in adults receiving a kidney transplant from a living or standard criteria deceased donor. Patients were randomized to a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept, or cyclosporine. 471/666 patients completed ≥3 years of therapy. A total of 92% (MI), 92% (LI), and 89% (cyclosporine) of patients survived with a functioning graft. The mean calculated GFR (cGFR) was ～21 mL/min/1.73 m(2) higher in the belatacept groups versus cyclosporine at year 3. From month 3 to month 36, the mean cGFR increased in the belatacept groups by +1.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year (MI) and +1.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year (LI) versus a decline of -2.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year (cyclosporine). One cyclosporine-treated patient experienced acute rejection between year 2 and year 3. There were no new safety signals and no new posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) cases after month 18. Belatacept-treated patients maintained a high rate of patient and graft survival that was comparable to cyclosporine-treated patients, despite an early increased occurrence of acute rejection and PTLD.     

Randomized Phase 2b Trial of Tofacitinib (CP‐690,550) in De Novo Kidney Transplant Patients: Efficacy,Renal Function and Safety at 1 Year

In this Phase 2b study, 331 low‐to‐moderate risk de novo kidney transplant patients (approximately 60% deceased donors) were randomized to a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of tofacitinib (CP‐690, 550), an oral Janus kinase inhibitor or cyclosporine (CsA). All patients received basiliximab induction, mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids. Primary endpoints were: incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) with a serum creatinine increase of ≥0.3 mg/dL and ≥20% (clinical BPAR) at Month 6 and measured GFR at Month 12. Similar 6‐month incidences of clinical BPAR (11%, 7% and 9%) were observed for MI, LI and CsA. Measured GFRs were higher (p < 0.01) at Month 12 for MI and LI versus CsA (65 mL/min, 65 mL/min vs. 54 mL/min). Fewer (p < 0.05) patients in MI or LI developed chronic allograft nephropathy at Month 12 compared with CsA (25%, 24% vs. 48%). Serious infections developed in 45%, 37% and 25% of patients in MI, LI and CsA, respectively. Anemia, neutropenia and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder occurred more frequently in MI and LI compared with CsA. Tofacitinib was equivalent to CsA in preventing acute rejection, was associated with improved renal function and less chronic allograft histological injury, but had side‐effects at the doses evaluated.     

Bilateral Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Cyclosporine A and Atorvastatin in Renal Transplant Recipients

Atorvastatin is increasingly used as a cholesterol-lowering agent in solid organ transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine A (CsA). However, the potential bilateral pharmacokinetic interaction between atorvastatin and CsA in renal transplant recipients has not previously been examined. Baseline 12-h CsA pharmacokinetic investigation was performed in 21 renal transplant recipients and repeated after 4 weeks of atorvastatin treatment (10 mg/ d). At week 4, 24-h pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin was also performed. All patients received basiliximab induction followed by CsA and prednisolone immunosuppression. Compared with historic controls, CsA-treated patients showed, on average, sixfold higher plasma HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity after 4 weeks of atorvastatin treatment (p < 0.05). Atorvastatin had a moderate effect on the pharmacokinetics of CsA and reduced the AUC0-12 (area under curve, 0-12h) by 9.5 +/- 18% (p = 0.013) and Cmax (maximal concentration) by 13.5 +/- 24% (p =0.009), while C12 (trough level) was unchanged (p =0.42). Total and LDL cholesterol decreased by 26.8 +/- 8.4% (p < 0.0001) and 41.5 +/- 11.0% (p < 0.0001), respectively. Bilateral pharmacokinetic interaction between atorvastatin and CsA resulted in sixfold higher plasma HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity, but only a moderate decrease in systemic exposure of CsA.     

Impact of Early or Delayed Cyclosporine on Delayed Graft Function in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Multicenter Study

The benefit of delayed cyclosporine in reducing risk of delayed graft function (DGF) is not clearly established. This study compared early vs. delayed cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) in de novo renal transplant patients. Patients were randomized to early (day 0, n = 97) or delayed (day 6, n = 100) CsA-ME at an initial dose of 8 mg/kg/day with dose adjusted according to C₂ level. All patients received enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), steroids and an anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody. In both groups, 33% of patients were at high risk of DGF; 26 patients (26.8%) in the early CsA-ME group and 23 patients (23.0%) in the delayed CsA-ME group experienced DGF (n.s.). Renal function at 3 months was comparable (creatinine clearance 51.1mL/min with early CsA-ME and 53.8 mL/min with delayed CsA-ME), and remained similar to 12 months. Treatment failure, defined as biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss or death, did not differ significantly at 12 months (23.7% with early CsA-ME vs. 29.0% with delayed CsA-ME). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 15.5% of early CsA-ME and 26.5% of delayed CsA-ME patients (n.s.). Both regimens were well tolerated. These data suggest that early or delayed introduction of CsA-ME results in similar renal function in renal transplant patients regardless of DGF risk level.     

Risk of Developing Fibroadenoma with the Use of Cyclosporine A in Renal Transplant Recipients

To investigate the effect of cyclosporine A (Cyc A) on the development of fibroadenomas, 30 renal transplant patients and 20 chronic renal failure patients on dialysis were breast examined with ultrasonography and/or mammography. Of the renal transplant patients, 17 were receiving Cyc A-based combination therapy for immunosuppression. All patients were female with the age range of 29.7 ± 9.2 years in the transplant group and 33.95 ± 9.91 in the dialysis group. Eight of the 17 patients receiving Cyc A had fibroadenomas, 5 of them having bilateral lesions. None of the other patients, those on dialysis and on non-Cyc A combination therapy had fibroadenomas. A significant difference for fibroadenoma incidence in patients receiving Cyc A combination immunosuppression was found.     

Comparison of Utilization and Clinical Outcomes for Belatacept‐ and Tacrolimus‐Based Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients

The performance of belatacept in a real clinical setting has not been reported. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using registry data comparing 1‐year clinical outcomes between belatacept‐ and tacrolimus‐treated adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from January 6, 2011, through January 12, 2014. Of 50 244 total patients, 417 received belatacept plus tacrolimus, 458 received belatacept alone, and 49 369 received tacrolimus alone at discharge. In the overall study cohort, belatacept alone was associated with a higher risk of 1‐year acute rejection, with the highest rates associated with non–lymphocyte‐depleting induction (adjusted hazard ratio 2.65, 95% confidence interval 1.90–3.70, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in rejection rates between belatacept plus tacrolimus and tacrolimus alone. In KTRs who met inclusion criteria for the Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First‐line Immunosuppression Trial–Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT‐EXT), 1‐year kidney function was higher with belatacept plus tacrolimus and belatacept alone versus tacrolimus alone (mean estimated GFR 65.6, 60.4 and 54.3 mL/min per 1.73 m², respectively; p < 0.001). The incidence of new‐onset diabetes after transplantation was significantly lower with belatacept plus tacrolimus and belatacept alone versus tacrolimus alone (1.7%, 2.2%, and 3.8%, respectively; p = 0.01). Despite improved graft function and metabolic complications with belatacept alone, it may be advisable to add short‐term tacrolimus in the first year after transplant and to consider lymphocyte‐depleting induction in patients with high rejection risk, as the risk–benefit ratio allows.     

Sirolimus Does Not Exhibit Nephrotoxicity Compared to Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients

Sirolimus and cyclosporine (CsA) prevent acute rejection in man when used as primary therapies in triple drug regimens. Sirolimus does not act via the calcineurin pathway and therefore is not expected to produce the same renal side-effects. This paper presents the pooled 2-year data analysis of renal function parameters from two open-label, randomized, multicenter studies. Patients (18-68 years) receiving a primary renal allograft were randomized to receive concentration-controlled sirolimus (n = 81) or CsA (n = 80), in combination with azathioprine and steroids (n = 83), or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids (n = 78). From week 10 through year 2, calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was significantly higher in sirolimus--than in CsA-treated patients (69.3 vs. 56.8 mL/min, at 2 years, p = 0.004). Serum uric acid was significantly higher in the CsA-treated patients and magnesium was significantly lower; these parameters were more likely to be within normal limits in the sirolimus group. Mean serum potassium and phosphorus were lower in sirolimus-treated patients. In conclusion, sirolimus, when administered as primary therapy in combination with azathioprine or MMF, has a favorable safety profile compared to CsA with regards to renal function.     

Everolimus Plus Reduced‐Exposure CsA versus Mycophenolic Acid Plus Standard‐Exposure CsA in Renal‐Transplant Recipients

Everolimus allows calcineurin‐inhibitor reduction without loss of efficacy and may improve renal‐transplant outcomes. In a 24‐month, open‐label study, 833 de novo renal‐transplant recipients were randomized to everolimus 1.5 or 3.0 mg/day (target troughs 3–8 and 6–12 ng/mL, respectively) with reduced‐exposure CsA, or mycophenolic acid (MPA) 1.44 g/day plus standard‐exposure CsA. Patients received basiliximab ± corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection, graft loss, death or loss to follow‐up) and the main safety endpoint was renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD]) at Month 12 (last‐observation‐carried‐forward analyses). Month 12 efficacy failure rates were noninferior in the everolimus 1.5 mg (25.3%) and 3.0 mg (21.9%) versus MPA (24.2%) groups. Mean eGFR at Month 12 was noninferior in the everolimus groups versus the MPA group (54.6 and 51.3 vs 52.2 mL/min/1.73 m² in the everolimus 1.5 mg, 3.0 mg and MPA groups, respectively; 95% confidence intervals for everolimus 1.5 mg and 3.0 mg vs MPA: ?1.7, 6.4 and ?5.0, 3.2, respectively). The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups. The use of everolimus with progressive reduction in CsA exposure, up to 60% at 1 year, resulted in similar efficacy and renal function compared with standard‐exposure CsA plus MPA.     

同种异体肾移植后CD4+、CD8+、CD16+、CD19+、CD56+变化及临床意义

目的了解对比肾移植受者术后体内淋巴细胞免疫表型的变化情况及其临床意义.方法采用多种单克隆抗体及流式细胞仪,对肾移植受者术后的淋巴细胞免疫表型进行了化验监测,分析了淋巴细胞免疫表型变化与免疫用药及并发症的关系.结果移植受者淋巴细胞免疫表型阳性细胞数普遍偏低(P＜0.05),肾移植后顺利恢复组的淋巴细胞免疫表型阳性细胞与健康对照组无差异(P＞0.05),肾移植后并发症组受者CD4+、CD8+阳性细胞数低于临床正常值,NK细胞及CD19+阳性细胞数减少(P＜0.05).肾移植后急排组的NK细胞及CD19+阳性细胞数明显增加,CD4+/CD8+比值偏高(P＜0.05).结论淋巴细胞免疫表型可用于评价移植受者的免疫状态,临床上根据受者的化验结果综合评价受者的免疫抑制状态,并作为调整免疫抑制剂用量的参考指标.     

Hyperhomocysteinemia in Renal Transplant Recipients

Renal transplantation is a commonly performed curative procedure for end-stage renal disease. With the increase in renal allograft half-lives, attention is now being focused on cardiovascular morbidity and death in the renal transplant recipient (RTR) population. Among the more novel cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors for which this group is at risk is hyperhomocysteinemia. Hyperhomocysteinemia has been associated with an increased risk of CVD, although prospective randomized trials designed to prove causality are still ongoing. Since plasma total homocysteine levels are inversely related to renal function, RTRs have a greatly increased prevalence of hyperhomocysteinemia. Other determinants of homocysteine include B-vitamins, albumin, age, and genetic polymorphisms. Although RTRs are resistant to the typical B-vitamin doses used to correct hyperhomocysteinemia in the general population, they do respond to supraphysiologic dose therapy. In terms of prevalence, etiology, and treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia, RTRs are very similar to the much larger chronic renal insufficiency population. For this reason, RTRs have been chosen as an ideal study population in investigating the effect of reducing hyperhomocysteinemia on CVD outcomes.     

Beta-Trace Protein-Based Equations for Calculation of GFR in Renal Transplant Recipients

Recently, we showed that serum beta-trace protein (BTP) is an alternative marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in renal transplant recipients (RTR). We have now developed three BTP-based GFR formulae derived by multiple regression analyses from the patients who had participated in that study. Currently, we validated the diagnostic performance of these BTP-formulae in 102 consecutive RTR who underwent a technetium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) clearance for GFR measurement in comparison to the re-expressed Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation and a recently proposed BTP-based equation (referred to as 'White equation').
The best-performing BTP formula was found to be: GFR = 89.85 × BTP^−0.5541× urea^−0.3018. This equation estimated true GFR virtually without bias (+0.43 mL/min/1.73 m ² , not significant [NS]), while a small, but significant, overestimation was seen for the MDRD formula (+3.43 mL/min/1.73 m ² , p = 0.003). Precision and accuracies within 50% of true GFR (93.1% and 88.2%, respectively) tended to be higher for the BTP formula, but the differences did not reach significance. The White equation overestimated the true GFR by 9.43 mL/min/1.73 m ² (p = 0.001), and was inferior with respect to precision and 50% accuracy (79.4%). BTP-based GFR calculations are reliable, and may serve as an alternative to the re-expressed MDRD equation .     

Effect of Pregnancy on Long-Term Kidney Function in Renal Transplant Recipients Treated with Cyclosporine and with Azathioprine

In order to investigate the effect of different immunosuppressive regimens and the time interval between transplantation and pregnancy on long-term outcome, we performed a case-control study in pregnant renal allograft recipients. Eighty-one pregnancies of kidney transplanted recipients were identified [cyclosporine (CYA): n = 40; azathioprine (AZA): n = 41]. Controls were matched with respect to important prognostic factors. Posttransplant follow-up was 91.3 +/- 5 months. Graft and patient survival were similar in both groups and there was no apparent effect of immunosuppression. A total of 28 recipients (33%) delivered within 2 years and 6 (8%) subjects within 1 year after transplantation, but these short transplantation-to-pregnancy intervals had no apparent adverse effect on long-term outcome. In contrast to AZA-treated patients, CYA-treated patients experienced an increase in serum creatinine postpartum (1.15 +/- 0.2 mg/dL vs. 1.61 +/- 0.1 mg/dL; p < 0.05). Whole blood CYA levels decreased transiently during pregnancy from 115.9 +/- 8 ng/mL to 80.7 +/- 7 ng/mL leading to a gradual increase in drug dose from 240 +/- 14 mg/day to 324 +/- 21 mg/day (p < 0.05). Following delivery, there was an increase in CYA concentrations to 173 +/- 5.4 ng/mL, requiring rapid dose tapering to baseline of 246 +/- 15 mg/day. Pregnancies in renal recipients do not affect long-term patient and graft survival, independent of the immunosuppression. No detrimental effect of short transplantation-to-pregnancy intervals on long-term graft function was detected.