Health-related quality of life in high-grade glioma patients

Gliomas are malignant primary brain tumors and yet incurable. Palliation and the maintenance or improvement of the patient＇s quality of life is therefore of main importance. For that reason, health-related quality of life （HRQoL） has become an important outcome measure in clinical trials, next to traditional outcome measures such as overall and progression-free survivals, and radiological response to treatment. HRQoL is a multidimensional concept covering physical, psychological, and social domains, as well as symptoms induced by the disease and its treatment. HRQoL is assessed by using self-reported, validated questionnaires. Various generic HRQoL questionnaires, which can be supplemented with a brain tumor- specific module, are available. Both the tumor and its treatment can have a negative effect on HRQoL. However, treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and supportive treatment may also improve patients＇ HRQoL, in addition to extending survival. It is expected that the impact of HRQoL measurements in both clinical trials and clinical practice will increase. Hence, it is important that HRQoL data are collected, analyzed, and interpreted correctly. Methodological issues such as selection bias and missing data may hamper the interpretation of HRQoL data and should therefore be accounted. In clinical trials, HRQoL can be used to assess the benefits of a new treatment strategy, which should be weighed carefully against the adverse effects of that treatment. In daily clinical practice, HRQoL assessments of an individual patient can be used to inform physicians about the impact of a specific treatment strategy, and it may facilitate the communication between the physicians and the patients.     

Racial,ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the treatment of brain tumors

Disparities in American health care based on socially-defined patient characteristics such as race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position are well-documented. We review differences and disparities in incidence, pathobiology, processes and outcomes of care, and survival based on social factors for brain tumors of all histologies. In the US, black patients have lower incidences of most brain tumor types and lower-income patients have lower incidences of low grade glioma, meningioma and acoustic neuroma; ascertainment bias may contribute to these findings. Pathogenetic differences between malignant gliomas in patients of different races have been demonstrated, but their clinical significance is unclear. Patients in disadvantaged groups are less often treated by high-volume providers. Mortality and morbidity of initial treatment are higher for brain tumor patients in disadvantaged groups, and they present with markers of more severe disease. Long term survival differences between malignant glioma patients of different races have not yet been shown. Clinical trial enrollment appears to be lower among brain tumor patients from disadvantaged groups. We propose future research both to better define disparities and to alleviate them.     

Health-Related Quality of Life in EORTC clinical trials — 30 years of progress from methodological developments to making a real impact on oncology practice

The impact of cancer on patients' lives can be measured using self-reported questionnaires, known as Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) measures. HRQOL is defined as a multi-dimensional construct covering disease and treatment-related symptoms, physical, psychological, and social functioning.The EORTC Quality of Life Group (QLG) was created in 1984 with the mission to develop measures of HRQOL and to promote and coordinate clinical studies concerning the quality of life of cancer patients. The EORTC Quality of Life Department (QL Department) was founded in 1993 with the support of an EU grant to provide administrative, practical and scientific support to co-operative groups conducting clinical trials with HRQOL outcomes.We are proud to report significant scientific achievements that have made us international leaders in HRQOL research and have led to real changes to cancer patient treatments.We developed a modular system for HRQOL measurement consisting of the EORTC QLQ-C30, a core cancer quality of life questionnaire and supplementary questionnaire modules. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 has been one of the most widely used cancer questionnaires in randomized trials in oncology as demonstrated by systematic reviews. To date, the EORTC QLQ-C30 has been translated and linguistically validated into more than 60 languages.HRQOL outcome measures have been an integral part of EORTC clinical trials for the last 30 years. We present examples of significant, practice-changing clinical trials evaluating HRQOL in several cancer sites, such as brain tumors, breast and ovarian cancers, and malignant melanoma. In a series of systematic reviews, we examined the quality of reporting HRQOL in international cancer clinical trials, and the impact of the results on oncology practice that led to a recommendation to improve CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) with regard to reporting of HRQOL.The QLG is an international leader in methodological research in the measurement of HRQOL in oncology and pursues research in several key areas, such as cross-cultural differences between populations in HRQOL assessment, Computer-Adaptive Testing, electronic administration of EORTC QLQ-C30, and summary scores for EORTC QLQ-C30.In summary, the QLG and QL Department have been international leaders in the field. Our questionnaires have brought HRQOL assessment to the fore in many international trials that have changed oncology practice and brought the patient's perspective into cancer research.     

"...those left behind." Biology and oncology of invasive glioma cells

Although significant technical advances in surgical and radiation treatment for brain tumors have emerged in recent years, their impact on clinical outcome for patients has been disappointing. A fundamental source of the management challenge presented by glioma patients is the insidious propensity of the malignant cells to invade into adjacent normal brain. Invasive tumor cells escape surgical removal and geographically dodge lethal radiation exposure. Recent improved understanding of the biochemistry and molecular determinants of glioma cell invasion provide valuable insight to the underlying biological features of the disease, as well as illuminating possible new therapeutic targets. Heightened commitment to migrate and invade is accompanied by a glioma cell's reduced proliferative activity. The microenvironmental manipulations coincident to invasion and migration may also impact the glioma cell's response to cytotoxic treatments. These collateral aspects of the glioma cell invasive phenotype should be further explored and exploited as novel antiglioma therapies.     

Glioma virus therapies between bench and bedside

Despite extensive research, current glioma therapies are still unsatisfactory, and novel approaches are pressingly needed. In recent years, both nonreplicative viral vectors and replicating oncolytic viruses have been developed for brain cancer treatment, and the mechanistic background of their cytotoxicity has been unveiled. A growing number of clinical trials have convincingly established viral therapies to be safe in glioma patients, and maximum tolerated doses have generally not been reached. However, evidence for therapeutic benefit has been limited: new generations of therapeutic vectors need to be developed in order to target not only tumor cells but also the complex surrounding microenvironment. Such therapies could also direct long-lasting immune responses toward the tumor while reducing early antiviral reactions. Furthermore, viral delivery methods are to be improved and viral spread within the tumor will have to be enhanced. Here, we will review the outcome of completed glioma virus therapy trials as well as highlight the ongoing clinical activities. On this basis, we will give an overview of the numerous strategies to enhance therapeutic efficacy of new-generation viruses and novel treatment regimens. Finally, we will conclude with approaches that may be crucial to the development of successful glioma therapies in the future.     

Concomitant administration of radiation with eribulin improves the survival of mice harboring intracerebral glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is the most common and devastating type of malignant brain tumor. We recently found that eribulin suppresses glioma growth in vitro and in vivo and that eribulin is efficiently transferred into mouse brain tumors at a high concentration. Eribulin is a non‐taxane microtubule inhibitor approved for breast cancer and liposarcoma. Cells arrested in M‐phase by chemotherapeutic agents such as microtubule inhibitors are highly sensitive to radiation‐induced DNA damage. Several recent case reports have demonstrated the clinical benefits of eribulin combined with radiation therapy for metastatic brain tumors. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of a combined eribulin and radiation treatment on human glioblastoma cells. The glioblastoma cell lines U87MG, U251MG and U118MG, and SJ28 cells, a patient‐derived sphere culture cell line, were used to determine the radiosensitizing effect of eribulin using western blotting, flow cytometry and clonogenic assay. Subcutaneous and intracerebral glioma xenografts were generated in mice to assess the efficacy of the combined treatment. The combination of eribulin and radiation enhanced DNA damage in vitro. The clonogenic assay of U87MG demonstrated the radiosensitizing effect of eribulin. The concomitant eribulin and radiation treatment significantly prolonged the survival of mice harboring intracerebral glioma xenografts compared with eribulin or radiation alone (P < .0001). In addition, maintenance administration of eribulin after the concomitant treatment further controlled brain tumor growth. Aberrant microvasculature was decreased in these tumors. Concomitant treatment with eribulin and radiation followed by maintenance administration of eribulin may serve as a novel therapeutic strategy for glioblastomas.     

The effect of calmodulin inhibitors with bleomycin on the treatment of patients with high grade gliomas.

Glioblastoma multiforme is a fatal malignancy of the central nervous system, demanding new methods of treatment. The combination of a calmodulin antagonist with bleomycin has shown synergistic activity in several preclinical models and has been evaluated in a Phase I clinical trial. Since phenothiazines reach high concentrations in the central nervous system, and bleomycin has been reported to have antitumoral activity as well, we studied this combination in a Phase II clinical trial. In addition, we purified calmodulin from normal brain and malignant gliomas to determine its biochemical and pharmacological characteristics. Seventeen patients were entered onto this study and all were evaluable. There were no partial or complete responses. There was one case of fatal pulmonary toxicity in a patient showing an objective tumor response. Otherwise, the treatment was well tolerated. Calmodulin purified from the normal brain and gliomas of patients undergoing resection was identical to each other and to calmodulin prepared from rat cerebrum and glioma. These characteristics included elution from a TSK phenyl high pressure liquid chromatography column, migration on 16% sodium dodecyl sulfate gels, amino acid composition, and inhibition by drugs. Therefore, the failure of this combination therapy was not due to a difference in human glioma calmodulin as compared to previously reported studies with calmodulin from murine sources.     

Health-related quality of life in patients with high-grade glioma

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has become an increasingly important endpoint in cancer studies; however, the research into the HRQOL of patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) is sparse compared with that for patients with other neoplasms. Owing to the specific location and poor prognosis, it is more important and difficult to study HRQOL in patients with HGG than in those with other tumors; furthermore, the study of HRQOL in patients with HGG differs from that for patients with other tumors. In this review, we identified and compared the most frequently used instruments to assess HRQOL; analyzed specific facets and determinants of HRQOL (such as sex, tumor location and histological classification, depression, and cognitive function), as well as the association between HRQOL and survival; and appraised the effects of new treatments on HRQOL in patients with HGG from randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, we detected broadly existing problems and many contradictory outcomes and gave some proper interpretation and suggestions regarding them.     

热疗在胶质瘤治疗中的研究进展

胶质瘤是很常见的恶性脑肿瘤,目前主要治疗方法包括手术、放疗与化疗,但患者生存率较低、预后较差。上述方法的一些局限性促使人们寻找更有效、更安全的治疗方法。热疗是一种局部或全身加热,利用高温杀灭肿瘤细胞,从而达到治疗效果的方法。在胶质瘤治疗中有着如创伤性小、精确性高等优点,与放化疗联用可以改善预后。目前已作为一种具有极大潜在优势的胶质瘤治疗手段。本文主要介绍应用于胶质瘤治疗的热疗方法,热疗在胶质瘤治疗中的应用前景与应用现状,以及研究相对成熟且已上市的、可应用于胶质瘤热疗的设备及操作方法。     

Neurobehavioral status and health-related quality of life in newly diagnosed high-grade glioma patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and cognitive functioning of high-grade glioma patients in the postneurosurgical period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The HRQOL, as assessed by the Short-Form Health Survey-36, tumor-specific symptoms, and objective and subjective neuropsychologic functioning, of 68 newly diagnosed glioma patients were compared with that of 50 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The association between tumor lateralization, extent of resection, and use of medication, and the HRQOL outcomes was also investigated. RESULTS: The HRQOL of the two patient groups was similar but significantly lower than that of the healthy controls. Glioma patients reported significantly more neurologic symptoms and poorer objective and subjective neuropsychologic functioning than the NSCLC patients. Using healthy controls as the reference group, cognitive impairment assessed at the individual patient level was observed in all glioma patients and 52% of the NSCLC patients. Poor performance on timed tasks in the glioma group could be attributed, in large part, to visual and motor deficits. Tumor lateralization was found to affect neuropsychologic functioning in a predictable manner. The extent of resection was not related significantly to neuropsychologic functioning. Corticosteroid use was associated with better recognition memory, whereas antiepileptic drug use was correlated negatively with working memory capacity. CONCLUSION: The general HRQOL of glioma patients is similar to that of patients with NSCLC. However, they suffer from a number of condition-specific neurologic and neuropsychologic problems that have a significant impact on their daily lives in the postsurgical period, before treatment with radiotherapy.     

From the clinician's point of view - What is the status quo of positron emission tomography in patients with brain tumors?

The most common type of primary brain tumor is malignant glioma. Despite intensive therapeutic efforts, the majority of these neoplasms remain incurable. Imaging techniques are important for initial tumor detection and comprise indispensable tools for monitoring treatment. Structural imaging using contrast-enhanced MRI is the method of choice for brain tumor surveillance, but its capacity to differentiate tumor from nonspecific tissue changes can be limited, particularly with posttreatment gliomas. Metabolic imaging using positron-emission-tomography (PET) can provide relevant additional information, which may allow for better assessment of tumor burden in ambiguous cases. Specific PET tracers have addressed numerous molecular targets in the last decades, but only a few have achieved relevance in routine clinical practice. At present, PET studies using radiolabeled amino acids appear to improve clinical decision-making as these tracers can offer better delineation of tumor extent as well as improved targeting of biopsies, surgical interventions, and radiation therapy. Amino acid PET imaging also appears useful for distinguishing glioma recurrence or progression from postradiation treatment effects, particularly radiation necrosis and pseudoprogression, and provides information on histological grading and patient prognosis. In the last decade, the tracers O-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) and 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[¹⁸F]-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) have been increasingly used for these indications. This review article focuses on these tracers and summarizes their recent applications for patients with brain tumors. Current uses of tracers other than FET and FDOPA are also discussed, and the most frequent practical questions regarding PET brain tumor imaging are reviewed.     

Aging-related gene signature regulated by Nlrp3 predicts glioma progression

Aging is the strongest risk factor for glioma development, suggesting that molecular crosstalks between aging and tumorigenesis exist in many cellular pathways. Recently, Nlrp3 inflammasome have been shown to modulate several major cellular pathways such as inflammation and cell death and have been demonstrated to be an upstream target that controlled the process of brain aging. We proposed Nlrp3 inflammasome may serve as a possible molecular link between aging and glioma progression. In this study, we generated a aging-related gene signature that regulated by Nlrp3 in mouse hippocampus and demonstrated that this gene signature can distinguish subsets of glioma samples and predicts clinical outcome in radiotherapy-treated patients. In addition, using U87 and GL261 xenograft mouse glioblastoma model, we found that Nlrp3 inflammasome contributed to radiotherapy resistance in glioma. Ionizing radiation can induce Nlrp3 inflammasome expression; Nlrp3 inhibition reduced tumor growth and prolonged the survival of mouse following IR treatment; Nlrp3 inhibition reduced number of senescent cells induced by IR. These results above suggest that Nlrp3 inflammasome is an important molecular link between brain aging and glioma progression; the Nlrp3 gene signature may serve as a predictive biomarker for glioma patients.     

Sunitinib impedes brain tumor progression and reduces tumor‐induced neurodegeneration in the microenvironment

Malignant gliomas can be counted to the most devastating tumors in humans. Novel therapies do not achieve significant prolonged survival rates. The cancer cells have an impact on the surrounding vital tissue and form tumor zones, which make up the tumor microenvironment. We investigated the effects of sunitinib, a small molecule multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, on constituents of the tumor microenvironment such as gliomas, astrocytes, endothelial cells, and neurons. Sunitinib has a known anti‐angiogenic effect. We found that sunitinib normalizes the aberrant tumor‐derived vasculature and reduces tumor vessel pathologies (i.e. auto‐loops). Sunitinib has only minor effects on the normal, physiological, non‐proliferating vasculature. We found that neurons and astrocytes are protected by sunitinib against glutamate‐induced cell death, whereas sunitinib acts as a toxin towards proliferating endothelial cells and tumor vessels. Moreover, sunitinib is effective in inducing glioma cell death. We determined the underlying pathways by which sunitinib operates as a toxin on gliomas and found vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2, KDR/Flk1) as the main target to execute gliomatoxicity. The apoptosis‐inducing effect of sunitinib can be mimicked by inhibition of VEGFR2. Knockdown of VEGFR2 can, in part, foster the resistance of glioma cells to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Furthermore, sunitinib alleviates tumor‐induced neurodegeneration. Hence, we tested whether temozolomide treatment could be potentiated by sunitinib application. Here we show that sunitinib can amplify the effects of temozolomide in glioma cells. Thus, our data indicate that combined treatment with temozolomide does not abrogate the effects of sunitinib. In conclusion, we found that sunitinib acts as a gliomatoxic agent and at the same time carries out neuroprotective effects, reducing tumor‐induced neurodegeneration. Thus, this report uncovered sunitinib's actions on the brain tumor microenvironment, revealing novel aspects for adjuvant approaches and new clinical assessment criteria when applied to brain tumor patients.     

Tumor‐associated macrophage interleukin‐β promotes glycerol‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase activation,glycolysis and tumorigenesis in glioma cells

Tumor‐immune crosstalk within the tumor microenvironment (TME) occurs at all stages of tumorigenesis. Tumor‐associated M2 macrophages play a central role in tumor development, but the molecular underpinnings have not been fully elucidated. We demonstrated that M2 macrophages produce interleukin 1β (IL‐1β), which activates phosphorylation of the glycolytic enzyme glycerol‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GPD2) at threonine 10 (GPD2 pT10) through phosphatidylinositol‐3‐kinase‐mediated activation of protein kinase‐delta (PKCδ) in glioma cells. GPD2 pT10 enhanced its substrate affinity and increased the catalytic rate of glycolysis in glioma cells. Inhibiting PKCδ or GPD2 pT10 in glioma cells or blocking IL‐1β generated by macrophages attenuated the glycolytic rate and proliferation of glioma cells. Furthermore, human glioblastoma tumor GPD2 pT10 levels were positively correlated with tumor p‐PKCδ and IL‐1β levels as well as intratumoral macrophage recruitment, tumor grade and human glioblastoma patient survival. These results reveal a novel tumorigenic role for M2 macrophages in the TME. In addition, these findings suggest possible treatment strategies for glioma patients through blockade of cytokine crosstalk between M2 macrophages and glioma cells.     

Differential effect of surgery and radiotherapy on neurocognitive functioning and health-related quality of life in WHO grade I meningioma patients

Background Potential treatment-related neurotoxicity and the indolent course of the disease mainly feed the controversy concerning the optimal timing of surgery and radiotherapy in meningioma patients. Object To quantify the additional negative effects of conventional radiotherapy compared to surgery alone on neurocognitive functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with WHO grade I meningiomas. Methods Neurocognitive functioning and HRQOL (SF36, EORTC-BCM20) were assessed in consecutive patients (1999–2005) with WHO grade I meningiomas at least 1 year after surgical treatment in two centers for brain tumor patients. Subsequently, we selected all patients who underwent surgery and conformal external beam fractioned radiotherapy (n = 18) and matched these patients for age, sex, and educational level with the same number of patients who had had surgery only (n = 18), as well as with the same number of healthy controls. Results No significant differences in neurocognitive functioning were found between the two meningioma patient groups; however, even meningioma patients who were treated with surgery only had a significantly lower neurocognitive functioning than healthy controls. Meningioma patients who were treated with surgery and radiotherapy had significantly lower HRQOL scores than meningioma patients who were treated with surgery only, who had HRQOL ratings comparable with healthy controls; these differences, however, disappeared after correction for the duration of disease. Conclusions In contrast with conventional thinking, long-term neurocognitive functioning was significantly impaired in our meningioma patients. Additional radiotherapy following surgery, however, does not have additional deleterious effects on neurocognitive outcome in these patients.     

Diagnosis and management of multifocal gliomas

Patients who present with multiple cerebral tumors are usually considered as having metastatic disease. If they have a history of a primary cancer in another site, the brain tumors are considered metastases and are usually managed with standard whole-brain radiotherapy. If no primary cancer site is known, a diagnostic work-up is performed, but if no primary site is found, they are still considered as brain metastases from an unknown primary site. Thus, such patients can either have brain biopsy (recommended) for further diagnostic consideration or, occasionally, they can be treated with whole-brain radiotherapy, depending on the age, performance status and wish of the patient. However, in some of these patients the multiple brain tumors represent multifocal glioma rather than metastases, resulting in incorrect treatment. In such cases, various MRI characteristics may be helpful in directing towards the correct diagnosis. Thus, patients who present with multiple brain tumors should not always be considered to have metastatic disease even if they have a previous diagnosis of systemic cancer, and multifocal glioma should be ruled out.     

Penetration of Idarubicin into Malignant Brain Tumor Tissue

Anthracyclines are effective in breast cancer and have in vitro cytotoxicity in glioma. In patients with glioma anthracyclines are not effective possibly because the hydrophilic drugs do not reach cytotoxic levels in tumor tissue. Idarubicin is more lipophilic than the other anthracyclines and is more cytotoxic in glioma cell lines. The uptake of idarubicin and its major metabolite idarubicinol in brain tumor tissue were measured in a patient with a brain metastasis from breast cancer and in 4 patients with malignant glioma after an oral dose of idarubicin (45 mg/m² in 1 patient; 25 mg/m² in 4 patients), given 15–24 h before brain tumor resection. The concentrations of idarubicin and of idarubicinol in tumor tissue exceeded the concurrent plasma concentrations as well as the peak plasma concentrations in all cases. The median tumor: concurrent plasma ratio of idarubicinol was 5.7 (range 1.7–18). The concentration of idarubicinol in the marginal zone between brain and tumor tissue was lower than in central tumor tissue, but was still higher than the plasma concentration in 2 of the 3 examined cases. Bone marrow suppression (platelets CTC grade 2, granulocytes CTC grade 4) occurred after a single dose of 45 ml/m². No toxicity was seen at a dose of 25 mg/m². These results, the in vitro activity of idarubicin in glioma, the convenience of oral administration, and its toxicity profile make clinical studies with idarubicin in malignant glioma, and perhaps also in brain metastases from breast cancer worthwhile.     

Standard of care therapy for malignant glioma and its effect on tumor and stromal cells

Glioblastoma is the most common and deadly of the primary central nervous system tumors. Recent advances in molecular characterization have subdivided these tumors into at least three main groups. In addition, these tumors are cellularly complex with multiple stromal cell types contributing to the biology of the tumor and treatment response. Because essentially all glioma patients are treated with radiation, various chemotherapies and steroids, the tumor that finally kills them has been modified by these treatments. Most of the investigation of the effects of therapy on these tumors has focused on the glioma cells per se. However, despite the importance of the stromal cells in these tumors, little has been done to understand the effects of treatment on stromal cells and their contribution to disease. Understanding how current standard therapy affects the biology of the tumor and the tumor stroma may provide insight into the mechanisms that are important to the inhibition of tumor growth as well as the biology of recurrent tumors.     

Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer--taking stock

Measurement of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer has become common. In this review, we take stock of the contribution that HRQOL measurement in breast cancer clinical trials makes to clinical decision making regarding selection of optimal treatment. A series of MEDLINE searches was conducted to identify all randomized trials in breast cancer that included self-reported HRQOL or psychosocial outcomes. A total of 256 citations were identified that included HRQOL or psychosocial outcomes in breast cancer patients, and 66 of these involved randomized clinical trials of treatment. These 66 reports of breast cancer clinical trials of treatment are discussed in this review. Forty-six of the trials evaluated biomedical interventions, and 20 evaluated psychosocial interventions. Among the biomedical trials, eight trials evaluated HRQOL in primary management of breast cancer, seven trials evaluated HRQOL in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer patients, 20 trials involved metastatic breast cancer, eight trials involved symptom control/supportive care, and three trials evaluated different approaches to investigation or follow-up of breast cancer patients. Among the psychosocial trials, 13 trials evaluated HRQOL in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer patients, and their partners or spouses, six trials involved metastatic breast cancer, and one trial focused on symptom control. We found that the contribution of HRQOL measurement to clinical decision making depended on the clinical setting. In primary management of breast cancer, where medical outcomes of several treatment options are equivalent, HRQOL measurement provided added information for clinical decision making beyond that of traditional medical outcomes. In trials in the adjuvant setting, HRQOL measurement did not influence clinical decision making. In metastatic disease, HRQOL outcomes provided little information beyond that obtained from traditional medical outcomes, including toxicity. In the symptom control/supportive care setting, results of HRQOL questionnaires targeting specific symptoms (e.g., emesis) guided treatment decisions. In psychosocial intervention trials, psychosocial and/or HRQOL measurements often provided the only outcome information; therefore, selection of instruments that captured attributes likely to be altered by the intervention was essential. Until results of ongoing trials in breast cancer are available, caution is recommended in initiating new HRQOL studies unless treatment equivalency is expected, or unless the HRQOL questions target unique or specific issues that can only be addressed through patient self-report, including outcomes of psychosocial interventions.     

VEGF Trap induces antiglioma effect at different stages of disease

Pathological angiogenesis is a hallmark of cancer, specifically of glioblastomas, the most malignant and common primary brain tumor. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the key protein in the regulation of the hypervascular phenotype of primary malignant brain tumors. In this study, we tested VEGF Trap, a soluble decoy receptor for VEGF, in an intracranial glioma model. VEGF Trap was administered in short or prolonged schedules to animals bearing human gliomas at different stages of disease. Of importance, VEGF Trap treatment was efficacious in both initial and advanced phases of tumor development by significantly increasing overall survival. Furthermore, this effect was enhanced in animals treated with more prolonged regimens. In addition, we observed the emergence of a VEGF Trap-resistant phenotype characterized by tumor growth and increased invasiveness. Our results suggest that VEGF Trap will be effective in treating both patients with recurrent or progressive resectable glioblastoma and patients that have undergone extensive initial surgery. Finally, our results indicate that the clinical success of VEGF Trap may depend on a prolonged treatment in combined therapy aiming to simultaneously inhibit angiogenesis and tumor invasion.