Infectious risk and retroviral restriction factors in xenotransplantation

The clinical application of xenotransplantation evokes immunological and microbiological as well as virological challenges. Porcine pathogens that do not show any symptoms in their natural host could exhibit a risk of fatal infections to humans. The presence of pig infectious agents including zoonotic and dissimilar agents should be reduced by specific pathogen free (spf) breeding of donor animals. However, the genetic information of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) is integrated in the pig genome and can not be eradicated by spf breeding. The concerns about PERV for human xenograft recipients are based on data of in vitro replication of PERV in some human cell lines. So far, viral replication of PERV has been difficult to demonstrate in non‐human primate cell lines and in preclinical studies of non‐human primates receiving porcine xenografts, respectively. In this regard, natural and effective mechanisms of human and porcine cells counteracting productive infections caused by PERV are important to investigate. Intracellular proteins and components of the innate immune system including endogenous “antiretroviral restriction factors” act at various steps in retroviral replication. The cellular front is composed by several constitutively expressed genes which prevent or suppress retroviral infections. Some of these factors such as members of the tripartite motif (TRIM) and the apolipoprotein B mRNA‐editing polypeptide (APOBEC) families as well as tetherin and zinc‐finger antiviral protein (ZAP) could be useful in the management of PERV in xenotransplantation. The risks of infection and the potential role of antiretroviral restriction factors in xenotransplantation are presented in detail.     

Infectious disease risks in xenotransplantation

Hurdles exist to clinical xenotransplantation including potential infectious transmission from nonhuman species to xenograft recipients. In anticipation of clinical trials of xenotransplantation, the associated infectious risks have been investigated. Swine and immunocompromised humans share some potential pathogens. Swine herpesviruses including porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) and porcine lymphotropic herpesvirus (PLHV) are largely species‐specific and do not, generally, infect human cells. Human cellular receptors exist for porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV), which infects certain human‐derived cell lines in vitro. PERV‐inactivated pigs have been produced recently. Human infection due to PERV has not been described. A screening paradigm can be applied to exclude potential human pathogens from “designated pathogen free” breeding colonies. Various microbiological assays have been developed for screening and diagnosis including antibody‐based tests and qualitative and quantitative molecular assays for viruses. Additional assays may be required to diagnose pig‐specific organisms in human xenograft recipients. Significant progress has been made in the evaluation of the potential infectious risks of clinical xenotransplantation. Infectious risk would be amplified by intensive immunosuppression. The available data suggest that risks of xenotransplant‐associated recipient infection are manageable and that clinical trials can be performed safely. Possible infectious risks of xenotransplantation to the community at large are undefined but merit consideration.     

Cellular interaction of functional porcine endogenous retrovirus

Human cells might display mechanisms counteracting infections by porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) in the course of pig‐to‐human xenotransplantation. Mammals have developed a number of protective strategies against viruses, including an intracellular antiretroviral defense as part of the innate immunity. In addition to the conventional innate and acquired immune responses an array of dominant genes have evolved that are constitutively expressed which suppress or prevent retroviral infections. Several of these antiretroviral restriction mechanisms have been identified including members of the tripartite motif (TRIM) and APOBEC families. The TRIM5 class of inhibitors appears to target incoming retroviral capsids and the APOBEC class of cytidine deaminases hypermutates and destabilizes retroviral genomes. Our data show that human and porcine cytidine deaminases inhibit PERV replication significantly, thereby reducing the infectious risk raised by PERV in vitro. The exact mechanism of the TRIM5 mediated restriction has not been exactly determined so far. Data published by Wood et al. (2009) indicate that PERV are insensitive to restriction by divergent TRIM5 molecules including human and monkey TRIM5α?proteins. The role of pig TRIM5 has not been clarified. We have identified a single TRIM5 gene in the pig genome. The impact of porcine TRIM5 protein on PERV will be tested using the human TRIM5α as a negative control, expecting that PERV will be insensitive to porcine TRIM5.     

Productive infection of primary human endothelial cells by pig endogenous retrovirus (PERV)

Abstract: The potential risk of viral transmission in the setting of xenotransplantation has gained major attention. Different porcine cell types have been shown to release retroviral particles, which are infectious for human cell lines in vitro. However, there are only a few data on whether PERV (pig endogenous retrovirus) is able to infect primary human cells. In this study we have analyzed endothelial cells, vascular fibroblasts, mesangial cells, mononuclear cells, hematopoetic stem cells and bone marrow stromal cells for PERV transmission. We now provide evidence for primary human endothelial cells, vascular fibroblasts, and mesangial cells to be susceptible to PERV transmission. PERV infection was productive in endothelial cells and mesangial cells. Our data confirm and extend former reports concerning the PERV infection of human cells. The PERV infection of different primary human cells represents further significant evidence for a viral risk during xenotransplantation. In this context, special attention should be directed towards productive infection of human endothelial cells: in the setting of xenotransplantation this cell type will have close contact with porcine cells and PERV particles.     

Virus and host factors in pathogenesis

Zoonoses pose a threat to mammalian species. Cross‐species transmission of viruses have given rise to fatal diseases because the host organism is not prepared to resist a new pathogen. Mammals have developed several strategies of defense against viruses, including an intracellular antiretroviral defense, a part of innate immunity. In addition to the conventional innate and acquired immune responses, complex organisms such as mice and primates have evolved an array of dominant, constitutively expressed genes that suppress or prevent retroviral infections. Several of these antiretroviral restriction mechanisms have recently been identified, with two particularly well described factors being members of the tripartite motif (TRIM) and APOBEC families. The TRIM5 class of inhibitors appears to target incoming retroviral capsids and the APOBEC class of cytidine deaminases hypermutates and destabilizes retroviral genomes. Lentiviruses such as HIV‐1 have developed countermeasures that allow them to replicate despite the human host factors. In the course of risk assessment for pig‐to‐human xenotransplantation the capacity of human cells to counteract infections of gamma‐type porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) should be analyzed. We raised the question as to whether PERV is affected by APOBEC3 proteins. Initial data indicate that human and porcine cytidine deaminases inhibit PERV replication, thereby possibly reducing the risk for infection of human cells by PERV as a consequence of pig‐to‐human xenotransplantation. The exact mechanism of the TRIM5 mediated restriction has not been clarified up to now. At current, we investigate how many TRIM5 genes are located in the pig genome. Furthermore, the properties of porcine TRIM5α isoform proteins will be tested and we will check the potential of the human TRIM5α to restrict PERVs in order to determine the risk of virus transmission.     

APOBEC3 proteins and porcine endogenous retroviruses

Xenotransplantation of porcine cells, tissues, and organs offers a solution to overcome the shortage of human donor materials. In addition to the immunological and physiological barriers, the existence of numerous porcine microorganisms including viruses poses a risk for xenozoonosis. Three classes of functional gamma-type porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) have been identified, whereby functional polytropic PERV-A and PERV-B infect human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) and other cell lines in vitro. In the course of risk assessment for xenotransplantation the capacity of human cells to counteract PERV infections should be analyzed. Primates and other mammals display different means of protection against viral infections. APOBEC3 proteins which are cytidine deaminases and a part of the intrinsic immunity mediate potent activity against a wide range of retroviruses including murine leukemia viruses (MLV). As PERV and MLV belong to the same genus, we raised the question as to whether PERV is affected by APOBEC3 proteins. Initial data indicate that human and porcine cytidine deaminases inhibit PERV replication, thereby possibly reducing the risk for infection of human cells by PERV as a consequence of pig-to-human xenotransplantation.     

No in vivo infection of triple immunosuppressed non‐human primates after inoculation with high titers of porcine endogenous retroviruses*

Abstract: Background: Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) released from pig tissue can infect selected human cells in vitro and therefore represent a safety risk for xenotransplantation using pig cells, tissues, or organs. Although PERVs infect cells of numerous species in vitro, attempts to establish reliable animal models failed until now. Absence of PERV transmission has been shown in first experimental and clinical xenotransplantations; however, these trials suffered from the absence of long‐term exposure (transplant survival) and profound immunosuppression. Methods: We conducted infectivity studies in rhesus monkeys, pig‐tailed monkeys, and baboons under chronic immunosuppression with cyclosporine A, methylprednisolone, and the rapamycin derivative. These species were selected because they are close to the human species and PERVs can be transmitted in vitro to cells of these species. In addition, the animals received twice, a C1 esterase inhibitor to block complement activation before inoculation of PERV. In order to overcome the complications of microchimerism, animals were inoculated with high titers of cell‐free PERV. In addition, to enable transmission via cell–cell contact, some animals also received virus‐producing cells. For inoculation the primate cell‐adapted strain PERV/5° was used which is characterized by a high infectious titer. Produced on human cells, this virus does not express alpha 1,3 Gal epitopes, does not contain porcine antigens on the viral surface and is therefore less immunogenic in non‐human primates compared with pig cell‐derived virus. Finally, we present evidence that PERV/5° productively infects cells from baboons and rhesus monkeys. Results: In a follow‐up period of 11 months, no antibody production against PERV and no integration of proviral DNA in blood cells was observed. Furthermore, no PERV sequences were detected in the DNA of different organs taken after necropsy. Conclusion: These results indicate that in a primate model, in the presence of chronic immunosuppression, neither the inoculation of cell‐free nor cell‐associated PERV using a virus already adapted to primate cells results in an infection; this is despite the fact that peripheral blood mononuclear cells of the same animals are infectible in vitro.     

Pig endogenous retroviruses and xenotransplantation

Xenotransplantation of porcine organs might provide an unlimited source of donor organs to treat endstage organ failure diseases in humans. However, pigs harbour retroviruses with unknown pathogenic potential as an integral part of their genome. While until recently the risk of interspecies transmission of these porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) during xenotransplantation has been thought to be negligible, several reports on infection of human cells in vitro and spread of PERV from transplanted porcine islets in murine model systems have somewhat challenged this view. Here, we compile available data on PERV biology and diagnostics, and discuss the significance of the results with regard to the safety of clinical xenotransplantation.     

Pseudotyping of Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus by Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus in a Pig Islet Xenotransplantation Model

The potential of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) as a human pathogen, particularly as a public health risk, is a major concern for xenotransplantation. In vitro PERV transmission to human cells is well established. Evidence from human/pig hematopoietic chimeras in immunodeficient mice suggests PERV transmission from pig to human cells in vivo . However, recently Yang et al. demonstrated in such a model that PERV-C, a nonhuman-tropic class, could be transmitted via pseudotyping by xenotropic murine leukemia virus (X-MLV). We developed a mouse pig islet xenotransplant model, where pig and human cells are located in physically separate compartments, to directly assess PERV transmission from a functional pig xenograft. X-MLV efficiently pseudotypes all three classes of PERV, including PERV-A and -B that are known to productively infect human cell lines and PERV-C that is normally not infectious for human cells. Pseudotyping also extends PERV's natural tropism to nonpermissive, nonhuman primate cells. X-MLV is activated locally by the surgical procedure involved in the tissue transplants. Thus, the presence and activation of endogenous X-MLV in immunodeficient mice limits the clinical significance of previous reports of in vivo PERV transmission from pig tissues to human cells.     

Knockdown of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) expression by PERV-specific shRNA in transgenic pigs

Abstract: Background: Xenotransplantation using porcine cells, tissues or organs may be associated with the transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). More than 50 viral copies have been identified in the pig genome and three different subtypes of PERV were released from pig cells, two of them were able to infect human cells in vitro. RNA interference is a promising option to inhibit PERV transmission. Methods: We recently selected an efficient si (small interfering) RNA corresponding to a highly conserved region in the PERV DNA, which is able to inhibit expression of all PERV subtypes in PERV‐infected human cells as well as in primary pig cells. Pig fibroblasts were transfected using a lentiviral vector expressing a corresponding sh (short hairpin) RNA and transgenic pigs were produced by somatic nuclear transfer cloning. Integration of the vector was proven by PCR, expression of shRNA and PERV was studied by in‐solution hybridization analysis and real‐time RT PCR, respectively. Results: All seven born piglets had integrated the transgene. Expression of the shRNA was found in all tissues investigated and PERV expression was significantly inhibited when compared with wild‐type control animals. Conclusion: This strategy may lead to animals compatible with PERV safe xenotransplantation.     

Safety of xenotransplantation: screening the donor pig and the recipient

Introduction: Xenotransplantation using pig cells and tissues may be associated with the transmission of porcine microorganisms including bacteria, parasites, fungi and viruses to the human recipient and may result in zoonones. Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) represent a special risk since PERV‐A and PERV‐B are present in the genome of all pigs and infect human cells. PERV‐C is not present in all pigs and does not infect human cells. However, recombinants between PERV‐A and PERV‐C have been observed in normal pigs characterised by higher replication rates compared with PERV‐A, and they are also able to infect human cells (1). Methods: In the past years numerous assays based on the PCR technology have been developed to screen for the prevalence and expression of PERV and other porcine microorganisms in the donor pig (2). Whereas most microorganisms may be eliminated by designated pathogen‐free breeding, PERVs cannot be removed this way. In addition, assays have been developed to analyse the recipient for the transmission of PERV and other microorganisms, either using PCR methods or immunological assays to detect an antibody production as a result of infection (3). Results: Using these assays, no transmission of PERV as well as of other porcine microorganisms has been observed in first preclinical and clinical xenotransplantations or animal infection experiments. This was especially true for the first clinical transplantation of pig islet cells approved by the New Zealand government (4). Until now there is no susceptible animal model to study PERV transmission and transplantations of porcine cells or organs to non‐human primates as they are associated with limitations concerning the safety aspect, which do not allow transmitting the negative findings to humans (5). Different experimental approaches are under development to reduce the probability of PERV transmission, e.g. the generation of transgenic pigs expressing PERV‐specific siRNA inhibiting PERV expression by RNA interference (6), genotypic selection of pigs with a low prevalence and expression of PERV and neutralising antibodies against the envelope proteins inhibiting PERV infection (7). Conclusion: Investigations of the last years resulted in highly sensitive and specific methods to study PERV and other microorganisms in donor pigs and human recipients of xenotransplants. These methods showed absence of PERV transmission in all investigated cases, both in more than 200 human xenotransplant recipients, mostly recipients of cellular xenotransplants, as well as in non‐human primates and small animals. New technologies under development may further decrease the probability of transmission. References: 1. Denner J. Recombinant porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV‐A/C): A new risk for xenotransplantation? Arch Virol 2008; 153: 1421–1426. 2. Kaulitz D, Mihica D, Dorna J, Costa MR, Petersen B, Niemann H, TÖnjes RR, Denner J. Development of sensitive methods for detection of porcine endogenous retrovirus‐C (PERV‐C) in the genome of pigs J Virol Methods 2011; 175(1): 60–65. 3. Denner, J. Infectious risk in xenotransplantation – what post‐transplant screening for the human recipient? Xenotransplantation 2011; 18(3): 151–157. 4. Wynyard S, Garkavenko O, Nathu D, Denner J, Elliott R. Microbiological safety of the first clinical pig islet xenotransplantation trial in New Zealand, submitted. 5. Mattiuzzo G, Takeuchi Y. Suboptimal porcine endogenous retrovirus infection in non‐human primate cells: implication for preclinical xenotransplantation. PLoS One 2010; 5(10): e13203. 6. Semaan M, Kaulitz D, Petersen B, Niemann H, Denner J. Long‐term effects of PERV‐specific RNA interference in transgenic pigs. Xenotransplantation 2012; 19(2): 112–21. 7. Kaulitz D, Fiebig U, Eschricht M, Wurzbacher C, Kurth R, Denner J. Generation of neutralising antibodies against porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). Virology 2011; 411(1): 78–86.     

Generation and testing of a highly specific anti-serum directed against porcine endogenous retrovirus nucleocapsid

Advances in xenotransplantation offer chances to alleviate the shortage of human donor organs. The discovery that pig endogenous retroviruses (PERV) can infect human cells in vitro has stimulated the discussion on infectious risk in xenotransplantation. A molecular and immunologic monitoring of xenograft recipients and of donor animals for putative infection with PERV and other microorganisms is inevitable. In this report, we describe the generation and testing of a highly specific anti-serum directed against the PERV nucleocapsid protein. The Gag amino acid (aa) sequence of PERV class B was used to define immunogenic domains by computer analysis. A peptide corresponding to the C-terminal 19 aa of the 10 kDa (p10) nucleocapsid (NC) portion of the Gag polyprotein was used to immunize rabbits. The generated serum was tested using recombinant PERV Gag protein expressed in insect cells, purified PERV virus particles and human 293 cells transfected or infected with PERV, respectively. Test methods included Western blotting, indirect immunofluorescence, immunoperoxidase assay and ELISA. The PERV anti-serum provides a tool that is instrumental for detection of a potential agent of zoonosis. It can be used for screening of donor animals and xenograft recipients in the course of xenotransplantation procedures.     

Xenotransplantation: Infectious Risk Revisited

Xenotransplantation is a possible solution for the shortage of tissues for human transplantation. Multiple hurdles exist to clinical xenotransplantation, including immunologic barriers, metabolic differences between pigs--the source species most commonly considered--and humans, and ethical concerns. Since clinical trials were first proposed almost 10 years ago, the degree of risk for infection transmitted from the xenograft donor to the recipient has been extensively investigated. A number of potential viral pathogens have been identified including porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV), porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV), and porcine lymphotropic herpesvirus (PLHV). Sensitive diagnostic assays have been developed for each virus. Human-tropic PERV are exogenous recombinants between PERV-A and PERV-C sequences and are present in only a subset of swine. Porcine cytomegalovirus can be excluded from herds of source animals by early weaning of piglets. In contrast, the risks associated with PLHV remain undefined. Microbiologic studies and assays for potential xenogeneic pathogens have furthered understanding of risks associated with xenotransplantation. Thus far, clinical xenotransplantation of pig tissues has not resulted in transmission of viral infection to humans; significant risks for disease transmission from swine to humans have not been confirmed. If immunologic hurdles can be overcome, it is reasonable to initiate carefully monitored clinical trials.     

Clinical Xenotransplantation: Pigs Might Fly?

Xenotransplantation has the potential to deliver an unlimited supply of organs for transplantation. However, this promise has yet to translate into clinical application, despite substantial research efforts in the last decade. Although increasing numbers of studies are being performed in relevant pre-clinical (pig-to-primate) transplantation models, so far these have highlighted the apparent elusiveness of long-term xenograft survival. Humoral rejection remains the main obstacle to success, but control of T cell-mediated rejection will be a problem in the future and there are major concerns about the possible transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) and other infectious agents. This article reviews recent advances in the understanding of acute vascular rejection (AVR), acute T cell-mediated rejection and PERV transmission and highlights some of the strategies that may prove successful in overcoming these problems. Although progress has been slow, the promise of an inexhaustible supply of organs is sufficient reason to continue research in these areas. Assuming the specific problem of AVR can be ameliorated by one of a number of strategies currently under investigation, there are grounds to believe that xenotransplantation will become a clinical reality. Pig xenografts, currently grounded, might eventually fly!