Prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness in Icelanders aged 50 years and older: the Reykjavik Eye Study

Purpose: This study aimed to study the prevalences and causes of visual impairment and blindness in an Icelandic adult population. Methods: The Reykjavik Eye Study includes a random sample of citizens of Reykjavik aged ≥ 50 years, with an equal proportion (6.4%) for each year of birth and each sex. A total of 1045 persons were examined, representing a response rate of 75.8%. All participants underwent an extensive ophthalmological examination using a standard protocol. We used World Health Organization (WHO) definitions for bilateral visual impairment (best corrected visual acuity [VA] < 6/18 or visual field of ≥ 5 ° and < 10 ° around the fixation point in the better eye) and blindness (VA < 3/60 or visual field < 5 ° in the better eye). We also used US criteria, which define bilateral visual impairment as present if VA is < 6/12 and blindness as present if VA is ≤ 6/60 (both in the better eye). The causes of visual loss were determined for all participants found to be visually impaired in one or both eyes. Results: The prevalences of bilateral visual impairment and blindness were 0.96% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–1.55) and 0.57% (95% CI 0.12–1.03), respectively, using the WHO criteria, and 2.01% (95% CI 1.16–2.86) and 0.77% (95% CI 0.24–1.29), respectively, using the US criteria. The prevalence rates were 4.40% and 5.45% for unilateral visual impairment and 1.72% and 3.06% for unilateral blindness, using the WHO and US criteria, respectively. Age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) was the major cause of bilateral visual loss, whereas the most common causes of unilateral visual loss were, in this order, amblyopia, cataract and glaucoma. Conclusions: Prevalence of visual loss increases with age. The leading cause of bilateral visual impairment and blindness was AMD, accounting for more than half of all cases, and cases of geographic atrophy outnumbered those of exudative AMD by two to one.     

Incidence of visual impairment and blindness in indigenous Australians within Central Australia: the Central Australian Ocular Health Study

Background: To estimate the incidence and causes of visual impairment and blindness among indigenous Australians living in Central Australia. Design: Clinic‐based cohort study. Participants: A total of 1884 individuals aged ≥20 years living in one of 30 remote communities within the statistical local area of ‘Central Australia’. Methods: From those initially recruited, 608 (32%) participants were reviewed again between 6 months and 3 years (median 2 years). Patients underwent Snellen visual acuity testing and subjective refraction. Following this, an assessment of their anterior and posterior segments was made. Baseline results were compared with those who were reviewed. Main Outcome Measures: The annual incidence rates and causes of bilateral visual impairment (vision worse than Snellen visual acuity 6/12 in the better eye) and bilateral blindness (Snellen visual acuity worse than 6/60 in the better eye). Results: The annual incidence of bilateral visual impairment and blindness was 6.82% (8.12% for those aged ≥40 years) per year and 0.50% (0.62% for those aged ≥40 years) per year, respectively. Refractive error, followed by cataract and diabetic retinopathy, were the main causes for incident bilateral visual impairment and blindness. Conclusion: This study has demonstrated rates of incident bilateral blindness and visual impairment among the indigenous Australian population within Central Australia, which are substantially higher than those from the non‐indigenous population. Services need to address the underlying causes of this incident vision loss to reduce visual morbidity in indigenous Australians living in central Australia.     

Visual impairment and blindness in rural central India: the Central India Eye and Medical Study

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate prevalence of visual impairment in rural central India. Methods: The population‐based Central India Eye and Medical Study included 4711 subjects with an age of 30+ years. Presenting visual acuity (PRVA) and best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were recorded. Visual impairment and blindness were defined using the World Health Organization (WHO) standard and United States (US) standard. Results: On the basis of PRVA and using WHO and US standards, 1049 [22%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 21.1, 23.5] subjects and 1290 (27%; 95% CI: 26.1, 28.7) subjects, respectively, were visually impaired, and 35 (0.7%; 95% CI: 0.5, 1.0) subjects and 116 (2.5%; 95% CI: 2.0, 2.9) subjects, respectively, were blind. The corresponding age‐standardized prevalence figures were 17%, 21%, 0.5% and 2%, respectively. Using best‐correcting glasses could eliminate PRVA‐visual impairment/blindness in 729 subjects (67% of all subjects with visual impairment/blindness). On the basis of BCVA and using WHO and US standards, 333 (7%; 95% CI: 6.3, 7.8) subjects and 473 (10%; 95% CI: 9.2, 10.9) subjects, respectively, had visual impairment, and 22 (0.5%; 95% CI: 0.3, 0.7) and 31 (0.7%; 95% CI: 0.4, 0.9) subjects, respectively, were blind. Corresponding age‐standardized prevalence figures were 5%, 8%, 0.4% and 0.5%, respectively. Causes for BCVA‐visual impairment/blindness were cataract (75%), postoperative posterior capsular opacification (4%), surgical complications (2%), corneal opacifications (2%), age‐related macular degeneration (2%), other macular diseases (1%), and glaucoma (1%). Conclusions: Age‐standardized prevalence of PRVA‐visual impairment/blindness (WHO definition) in the adult population of rural central India was 17%. Most frequent cause was undercorrected refractive error. Supply of correct glasses is the most efficient way to improve vision in the rural central India.     

Prevalence and causes of blindness and low vision among adults in Fiji

Background: To estimate the prevalence and causes of blindness and low vision among adults aged ≥40 years in Fiji. Design: Population‐based cross‐sectional study. Participants: Adults aged ≥40 years in Viti Levu, Fiji. Method: A population‐based cross‐sectional survey used multistage cluster random sampling to identify 34 clusters of 40 people. A cause of vision loss was determined for each eye with presenting vision worse than 6/18. Main Outcome Measures: Blindness (better eye presenting vision worse than 6/60), low vision (better eye presenting vision worse than 6/18, but 6/60 or better). Results: Of 1892 people enumerated, 1381 participated (73.0%). Adjusting sample data for ethnicity, gender, age and domicile, the prevalence of blindness was 2.6% (95% confidence interval 1.7, 3.4) and low vision was 7.2% (95% confidence interval 5.9, 8.6) among adults aged ≥40 years. On multivariate analysis, being ≥70 years was a risk factor for blindness, but ethnicity, gender and urban/rural domicile were not. Being Indo‐Fijian, female and older were risk factors for vision impairment (better eye presenting vision worse than 6/18). Cataract was the most common cause of bilateral blindness (71.1%). Among participants with low vision, uncorrected refractive error caused 63.3% and cataract was responsible for 25.0%. Conclusion: Strategies that provide accessible cataract and refractive error services producing good quality outcomes will likely have the greatest impact on reducing vision impairment.     

Cataract blindness in Paraguay – results of a national survey

PURPOSE To estimate the burden of visual loss and blindness due to cataract in people aged 50 years and over in Paraguay. METHODS Forty clusters of 60 persons each who were 50 years and older (2400 eligible persons) were selected by systematic random sampling from the entire population of Paraguay.A total of 2136 persons were examined (89% coverage). RESULTS For the population 50 years and over, the age- and gender- adjusted prevalence of bilateral blindness (VA &lt; 3/60 with available correction) was 3.14% (95% CI: 2.2–4.4). The adjusted prevalence of bilateral cataract blindness (VA &lt; 3/60) was 2.01% (95% CI: 1.3–3.0), making cataract the major cause of bilateral blindness in this age group (64%). The adjusted prevalence of bilateral severe visual impairment (VA &lt; 6/60 with available correction) was 5.17% (95% CI: 3.9–6.7) and the adjusted prevalence of severe visual impairment due to bilateral cataract (VA &lt; 6/60) was 3.09% (95% CI: 2.2–4.3). The cataract surgical coverage (persons) was 44% for bilaterally blind persons with VA &lt; 3/60; 36% for persons with bilateral VA &lt; 6/60; and 28% for any eye with VA &lt; 6/60 due to cataract. With IOL implantation, 77% of the operated eyes could see 6/18, against 46% of the non-IOLs (p &lt; 0.005), a significant better outcome. CONCLUSIONS There is a need to increase the cataract surgical coverage in Paraguay. The number of eye surgeons is adequate but the accessibility of cataract surgical services in rural areas and the affordability of surgery to large sections of society are major constraints.     

Age-specific prevalence and causes of bilateral and unilateral visual impairment in older Australians: the Blue Mountains Eye Study

Purpose : To report age‐specific prevalence and causes of bilateral and unilateral visual impairment in a representative older Australian population. Methods : Participants in the Blue Mountains Eye Study (n = 3654) underwent a detailed eye examination. Any visual impairment was defined as best‐corrected visual acuity (VA) of 6/12 or worse, moderate impairment as VA 6/24–6/60 and severe impairment as VA worse than 6/60 (the Australian definition for legal blindness). Bilateral visual impairment was defined from the better eye and unilateral impairment from the worse eye. Proportional causes for visual loss were determined by the examining ophthalmologist. Results : Prevalence of bilateral and unilateral visual impairment was strongly age related. Corresponding bilateral and unilateral visual impairment prevalence rates were, respectively, 0.6% and 3.6% for persons aged 49–59 years, 1.1% and 8.2% for ages 60–69, 5.4% and 20.1% for ages 70–79, and 26.3% and 52.2% for persons aged 80+ years. Overwhelmingly, age‐related maculopathy (ARM) was the predominant cause of bilateral blindness (13/17) and of moderate to severe bilateral visual impairment in persons aged 70+ years. However, cataract was the most frequent cause of mild bilateral visual impairment among persons aged 60+ years. Amblyopia was the most frequent cause of mild or worse unilateral visual impairment in persons aged 49–59 years. Cataract was the most common cause of mild unilateral visual impairment in people aged 60+ years, while ARM and cataract were jointly the most frequent causes of moderate to severe unilateral visual impairment in people aged 70+ years. Conclusions : These findings indicate that around half of visually impaired persons aged 60 years or over had cataract, a cause amenable to treatment.     

Incidence of blindness and low vision in a sample population: the Priverno Eye Study,Italy

PURPOSE: To study the incidence of blindness and low vision over a 7-year period. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The survivors of the original cohort of 860 persons from Priverno, Italy, aged 45 to 69 years, were reexamined. Of the 760 eligible survivors, 619 (81.4%) had a 7-year follow-up visit. METHODS: Baseline and follow-up examinations included the collection of anamnestic and ophthalmologic data by the same observers using the same methods and classification criteria to minimize sources of variability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity (VA) measured at 4 m by standardized logarithmic chart was expressed as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). World Health Organization definitions of blindness and low vision were adopted (respectively, VA > 1.3 logMar and VA > 0.6 to 1.3 logMar in the better eye or in either eye). Participants at risk for visual impairment were those without blindness or low vision in one or both eyes at baseline; participants at risk for one-eye visual impairment were those without blindness or low vision in both eyes at baseline. RESULTS: A total of 33 participants were defined as incident cases of visual impairment. The overall incidence figures for blindness, low vision, one-eye blindness, and one-eye low vision were respectively 0.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0-0.9), 1.3% (95% CI, 0.7-2.6), 1.2% (95% CI, 0.6-2.4), and 2.9% (95% CI, 1.8-4.6). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides population-based estimates of the incidence of visual impairment in an adult, free-living European population. With respect to the younger participants, older subjects at baseline were at higher risk for incident visual impairment, the main causes of which were cataract, myopia, and diabetic retinopathy. The incidence of visual impairment in the subgroup aged 55 to 64 years at baseline was significantly higher than that found in Beaver Dam 5-year study and similar to that found in Beaver Dam 10-year Study, when the same definitions were adopted. This difference may be partially explained by social and cultural habits of the female samples, but many other factors may play a role.     

Blindness and vision impairment in the elderly of Papua New Guinea

BACKGROUND: To estimate the magnitude and causes of blindness and vision impairment in Papua New Guinea for service delivery planning and ophthalmic education development. METHODS: Using the World Health Organization standardized Rapid Assessment of Cataract Surgical Services protocol, a population-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2005. By systematic, two-stage cluster random sampling, 39 clusters each of 30 people aged 50 years and over were selected from urban and rural locations. A cause of vision loss was determined for each eye with a presenting visual acuity worse than 6/18. RESULTS: Of the 1191 people enumerated, 1174 were examined (98.6%). The 50 years and older age-gender adjusted prevalence of vision impairment (presenting visual acuity less than 6/18 in the better eye) was 29.2% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 27.6, 35.1, Design Effect [deff] = 2.3). That of functional blindness (presenting visual acuity less than 6/60 in the better eye) was 8.9% (95% CI: 8.4, 12.0, deff = 1.2), and of World Health Organization blindness (but presenting, rather than best corrected, visual acuity of less than 3/60 in the better eye) was 3.9% (95% CI: 3.4, 6.1, deff = 1.0). Uncorrected refractive error (13.1%, 95% CI: 11.3, 15.1, deff = 1.2) and cataract (7.4%, 95% CI: 6.4, 10.2, deff = 1.3) were leading causes of vision impairment, age-gender adjusted. Cataract was the most common (age-gender adjusted 6.4%, 95% CI: 5.1, 7.3, deff = 1.1) cause of functional blindness. On bivariate analysis, increasing age (P < 0.001), illiteracy (P < 0.001) and unemployment (P < 0.001) were associated with functional blindness. Gender was not. CONCLUSIONS: The identification and treatment of refractive error and cataract need to be priorities for eye health services in Papua New Guinea if the burden of vision impairment and blindness is to be diminished. The education of community and hospital eye care providers, whether medical, nursing or other cadres, must emphasize these. Eye care services must be structured and provided to allow and encourage accessibility and uptake, with satisfactory treatment outcomes for these conditions.     

Prevalence and Causes of Visual Impairment and Blindness in Adults Aged 45 Years and Older from Parintins: The Brazilian Amazon Region Eye Survey

Purpose: To determine the prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness in adults aged 45 years and older from Parintins, Brazilian Amazon Region.

Methods: A random cluster sampling method was used to identify subjects 45 years of age and older from urban and rural census sectors of Parintins city, Amazonas State, from March 2014 to May 2015. Participants underwent a detailed ocular examination, including presenting (PVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The main cause of PVA<20/32 per eye was determined.

Results: A total of 2384 subjects were enumerated and 2041 (85.6%) examined. The prevalence of presenting mild visual impairment – MiVI (<20/32 – ≥20/63) in the better-seeing eye was 17.0% [95% CI: 15.3–18.7%], and 8.5% [95% CI: 7.3–9.7%] with best correction. The prevalence of presenting moderate visual impairment – MVI (<20/63 – ≥20/200) was 18.4% [95% CI: 16.2–20.6%], and 6.9% [95% CI: 5.8–8.0%] with best correction. The prevalence of presenting bilateral VA <20/200 was 4.3% [95% CI: 3.6–5.0%], and 3.3% [95% CI: 2.5–4.0%] with best correction and increased with older age. Cataract (47.8%) and glaucoma (7.5%) were its main causes. In less severely affected eyes, uncorrected refractive errors (MVI: 42.6%; MiVI: 79.0%), cataract (MVI: 40.6%; MiVI: 13.7%) and pterygium (MVI: 7.6%; MiVI: 2.7%) were the main causes.

Conclusions: Most cases of visual impairment in Parintins are either preventable or treatable, and public health initiatives should target cataract surgical services and refraction with spectacle provision.     

Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness and Diabetic Retinopathy in Gilan Province,Iran

Purpose: To conduct an assessment of avoidable blindness and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in Gilan, 2014.

Methods: A cross-sectional population-based survey was performed on a representative sample of urban and rural individuals aged ≥50 years of the province. Blindness was defined as presenting visual acuity (PVA) <3/60 in the better eye. Moderate visual impairment (MVI) and severe visual impairment (SVI) were defined as 6/60 ≤ PVA <6/18 and 3/60 ≤ PVA <6/60 in the better eye, respectively. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was determined based on random blood sugar (RBS) levels ≥200 mg/dL or a previous diagnosis. We used the Scottish grading system to grade DR.

Results: We invited 2975 individuals from 85 clusters. Age- and sex-adjusted prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) of blindness, SVI, MVI, and DM in 2587 participants (response rate: 86.9%) were 1.5% (95% CI: 1.1–2.0), 1.5% (95% CI: 0.9–2.0), 11.3% (95% CI: 9.9–12.7) and 21.4% (95% CI: 19.2–23.7), respectively. The leading causes of blindness were cataract (47.1%), age-related macular degeneration (14.7%) and DR (8.8%). Cataract surgery (CS) coverage was 69.3%. The main challenges for CS were cost and unawareness. The outcome of CS was good in 66.9% of operated eyes. Any DR and/or maculopathy were observed in 25.3% (95% CI: 21.0–29.5) of subjects including 12.6% (95% CI: 9.7–15.6) sight-threatening DR. In previously known DM cases, 215 (41.7%) had never undergone an eye examination for DR.

Conclusion: The proportion of avoidable blindness and DR is considerable in Gilan Province.     

Tromsø eye study: prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of visual impairment, retinopathy and macular oedema, and assess risk factors for retinopathy in persons with diabetes. Methods: The present study included 514 participants with diabetes aged 46–87 years from the Tromsø Eye Study, a sub‐study of the population‐based Tromsø Study in Norway. Visual acuity was measured using an auto‐refractor. Retinal images from both eyes were graded for retinopathy and macular oedema. We collected data on risk factor exposure from self‐report questionnaires, clinical examinations, laboratory measurements and case note reviews. Regression models assessed the cross‐sectional relationship between potential risk factors and diabetic retinopathy. Results: The prevalence of visual impairment (corrected Snellen visual acuity <20/60 in the better‐seeing eye) was 1.6%. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 26.8% and macular oedema 3.9%. In a multivariable logistic regression model, retinopathy was associated with longer diabetes duration (odds ratio, OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03–1.11), insulin use (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.19–3.85), nonfasting glucose (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00–1.15) and microalbuminuria (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.28–2.81). Sub‐group analyses showed association between retinopathy and even low levels of microalbuminuria (1.16 mg/mmol). Conclusion: The findings suggest that low levels of microalbuminuria may be a useful risk predictor for identifying individuals with diabetes at high risk of retinopathy. The study confirms previous findings that insulin use, longer diabetes duration and higher levels of blood glucose are associated with retinopathy in persons with diabetes. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was similar as reported in other studies.     

Prevalence and Causes of Blindness and Low Vision Revisited after 5 years of Eye Care in Timor-Leste

Purpose: To estimate the 2010 prevalence and causes of blindness and low vision among Timor-Leste adults aged ≥40 years, and compare these to the results of a survey conducted 5 years previously.

Method: A population-based cross-sectional survey used multistage cluster random sampling proportionate to size to identify 50 clusters of 45 people each. Cause of vision loss was determined for each eye with presenting visual acuity worse than 6/18.

Results: A participation rate of 89.5% (n?=?2014) was achieved. The gender-age-domicile adjusted prevalence was 7.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5, 8.8) for 6/60, and 3.6% (95% CI 2.7, 4.4) for 3/60 blindness (better eye presenting vision worse than 6/60 and 3/60, respectively) among Timorese aged ≥40 years. Cataract caused most blindness (69.3% at 6/60). The population prevalence of low vision (better eye presenting vision of 6/60 or better, but worse than 6/18) was 13.6% (95%CI 12.1, 15.1), most caused by uncorrected refractive error (57.4%) or cataract (39.5%). The prevalence and causes of blindness were unchanged compared with 5 years earlier, but low vision was less common.

Conclusion: Unusually for a developing country, Timor-Leste has initiated a cycle of evidence-based eye care in which, although with limitations, population data are periodically available for monitoring and planning.     

Viscoat versus Visthesia during phacoemulsification cataract surgery: corneal and foveal changes

Background

Reliable data are a pre-requisite for planning eye care services. Though conventional cross sectional studies provide reliable information, they are resource intensive. A novel rapid assessment method was used to investigate the prevalence and causes of visual impairment and presbyopia in subjects aged 40 years and older. This paper describes the detailed methodology and study procedures of Rapid Assessment of Visual Impairment (RAVI) project.

Methods

A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted using cluster random sampling in the coastal region of Prakasam district of Andhra Pradesh in India, predominantly inhabited by fishing communities. Unaided, aided and pinhole visual acuity (VA) was assessed using a Snellen chart at a distance of 6 meters. The VA was re-assessed using a pinhole, if VA was < 6/12 in either eye. Near vision was assessed using N notation chart binocularly. Visual impairment was defined as presenting VA < 6/18 in the better eye. Presbyopia is defined as binocular near vision worse than N8 in subjects with binocular distance VA of 6/18 or better.

Results

The data collection was completed in <12 weeks using two teams each consisting of one paramedical ophthalmic personnel and two community eye health workers. The prevalence of visual impairment was 30% (95% CI, 27.6-32.2). This included 111 (7.1%; 95% CI, 5.8-8.4) individuals with blindness. Cataract was the leading cause of visual impairment followed by uncorrected refractive errors. The prevalence of blindness according to WHO definition (presenting VA < 3/60 in the better eye) was 2.7% (95% CI, 1.9-3.5).

Conclusion

There is a high prevalence of visual impairment in marine fishing communities in Prakasam district in India. The data from this rapid assessment survey can now be used as a baseline to start eye care services in this region. The rapid assessment methodology (RAVI) reported in this paper is robust, quick and has the potential to be replicated in other areas.     

Prevalence and causes of blindness and low vision in a rural setting in Pakistan

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in people 40 years of age and older in Budni, Peshawar, Pakistan. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was carried out involving 1,106 men and women 40 years of age and older in a rural area in Pakistan's North West Frontier Province (NWFP). All subjects with a presenting visual acuity < 6/18 in either eye were referred to a centralized clinic for a standardized eye examination that included refraction and dilated fundal examination. The main outcome was blindness (presenting visual acuity < 3/60 in the better eye) and low vision (presenting VA < 6/18-3/60 in the better eye). RESULTS: Of 1,106 people examined, 21 (1.9%; 95% CI: 1.1-2.7%) were blind, while another 27 (2.4%) and 62 (5.5%) subjects had severe visual impairment (< 6/60-3/60) and visual impairment (< 6/18-6/60), respectively. Women, as compared to men, had a higher prevalence of visual impairment and severe visual impairment; but they had a lower prevalence of blindness (1.6 vs. 2.2%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (0.6%; 95% CI: -0.9-2.1%). Similarly farmers had the highest prevalence of blindness. The leading cause of blindness and low vision was cataract, which accounted for 14 of 21 (66.6%) cases of blindness and 49 of 89 (55.5%) cases of low vision. The second leading cause of blindness was uncorrected aphakia. CONCLUSION: Much of the blindness was due to unoperated cataract and uncorrected aphakia. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop ways in which cataract surgical output could be increased, and glasses provided to those who need them.     

Four-year incidence of visual impairment: Barbados Incidence Study of Eye Diseases

OBJECTIVE: To describe the 4-year incidence of visual impairment and causes of blindness among black participants of the Barbados Eye Studies. DESIGN: Population-based incidence study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The Barbados Incidence Study of Eye Diseases (BISED) followed the cohort of the Barbados Eye Study (BES), a prevalence study based on a simple random sample of Barbadians 40 to 84 years of age. BISED included 3193 black participants from the original cohort (85% of those eligible). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity (Ferris-Bailey chart) at baseline and follow-up was measured according to a modified Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol. By use of World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, low vision and blindness for an individual were defined as visual acuity (VA) <6/18 to 6/120 and <6/120, respectively, in the better eye. By commonly used US criteria, low vision and blindness were defined as VA < or = 20/40 and < or = 20/200, respectively. Vision loss was defined as a doubling of the visual angle (i.e., decrease of 15 letters or more read correctly between baseline and follow-up examinations). Progression was defined as vision loss among those with low vision at baseline. RESULTS: On the basis of WHO criteria, the overall 4-year incidence was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0%-4.4%) for low vision and 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.0%) for blindness. Incidence rates were higher using US criteria: 5.3% (95 % CI, 4.5%-6.2%) and 1.5% (95% CI, 1.1%-2.0%), respectively, reaching 21.5% and 7.3% for persons aged 70 years or older at baseline. One tenth of the cohort had vision loss, and 28.6% of those with low vision progressed. About one half of incident blindness was due to age-related cataract. Nearly one fifth was caused by open-angle glaucoma (OAG) alone or combined with cataract, and approximately 10% was caused by diabetic retinopathy (DR). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of visual impairment was high in this Afro-Caribbean population, particularly in older age groups, indicating the public health significance of visual loss for this and similar black populations. Cataract, OAG, and DR were among the leading causes of incident blindness, paralleling their high prevalence in this population.     

Prevalence and causes of blindness and low vision in Timor-Leste

AIM: To estimate the prevalence and causes of blindness and low vision in people aged > or = 40 years in Timor-Leste. METHOD: A population-based cross-sectional survey using multistage cluster random sampling to identify 50 clusters of 30 people. A cause of vision loss was determined for each eye presenting with visual acuity worse than 6/18. RESULTS: Of 1470 people enumerated, 1414 (96.2%) were examined. The age, gender and domicile-adjusted prevalence of functional blindness (presenting vision worse than 6/60 in the better eye) was 7.4% (95% CI 6.1 to 8.8), and for blindness at 3/60 was 4.1% (95% CI 3.1 to 5.1). The adjusted prevalence for low vision (better eye presenting vision of 6/60 or better, but worse than 6/18) was 17.7% (95% CI 15.7 to 19.7). Gender was not a risk factor for blindness or low vision, but increasing age, illiteracy, subsistence farming, unemployment and rural domicile were risk factors for both. Cataract was the commonest cause of blindness (72.9%) and an important cause of low vision (17.8%). Uncorrected refractive error caused 81.3% of low vision. CONCLUSION: Strategies that make good-quality cataract and refractive error services available, affordable and accessible, especially in rural areas, will have the greatest impact on vision impairment.     

Cause-specific prevalence of bilateral visual impairment in Victoria, Australia: the Visual Impairment Project

PURPOSE: To study the cause-specific prevalence of eye diseases causing bilateral visual impairment in Australian adults. DESIGN: Two-site, population-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were aged 40 years and older and resident in their homes at the time of recruitment for the study. The study was conducted during 1992 through 1996. METHODS: The study uses a cluster stratified random sample of 4744 participants from two cohorts, urban, and rural Victoria. Participants completed a standardized interview and eye examination, including presenting and best-corrected visual acuity, visual fields, and dilated ocular examination. The major cause of vision loss was identified for all participants found to be visually impaired. Population-based prevalence estimates are weighted to reflect the age and gender distribution of the two cohorts in Victoria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual impairment was defined by four levels of severity on the basis of best-corrected visual acuity or visual field: <6/18 > or =6/60 and/or <20 degrees > or =10 degrees radius field, moderate vision impairment; severe vision impairment, <6/60 > or =3/60 and/or <10 degrees > or =5 degrees radius field; and profound vision impairment <3/60 and/or <5 degrees radius field. In addition, less-than-legal driving vision, <6/12 > or =6/18, and/or homonymous hemianopia were defined as mild vision impairment. In Australia, legal blindness includes severe and profound vision impairment. RESULTS: The population-weighted prevalence of diseases causing less-than-legal driving or worse impairment in the better eye was 42.48/1000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.11, 54.86). Uncorrected refractive error was the most frequent cause of bilateral vision impairment, 24.68/1000 (95% CI, 16.12, 33.25), followed by age-related macular degeneration (AMD), 3.86/1000 (95% CI, 2.17, 5.55); other retinal diseases, 2.91/1000 (95% CI, 0.74, 5.08); other disorders, 2.80/1000 (95% CI, 1.17, 4.43); cataract, 2.57/1000 (95% CI, 1.38, 3.76); glaucoma, 2.32/1000 (95% CI, 0.72, 3.92); neuro-ophthalmic disorders, 1.80/1000 (95% CI, 0, 4.11); and diabetic retinopathy, 1.53/1000 (95% CI, 0.71, 2.36). The prevalence of legal blindness was 5.30/1000 (95% CI, 3.24, 7.36). Although not significantly different, the causes of legal blindness were uncorrected refractive errors, AMD, glaucoma, other retinal conditions, and other diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reduction of visual impairment may be attained with the application of current knowledge in refractive errors, diabetes mellitus, cataract, and glaucoma. Although easily preventable, uncorrected refractive error remains a major cause of vision impairment.     

Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in a rural North‐east China adult population: a population‐based survey in Bin County,Harbin

Acta Ophthalmol. 2010: 88: 669–674

Abstract.

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence and causes of visual impairment in a rural population in north‐east China. Methods: A population‐based study was conducted within Bin County, Harbin of north‐east China. Low vision and blindness were defined using the World Health Organization categories of visual impairment. The prevalence of visual impairment was estimated, and causes were identified based on best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as well as presenting visual acuity (VA). Results: Out of 5764 people, 4956 (86.01%) aged older than 40 participated in the study. The prevalence of visual impairment, low vision and blindness based on presenting VA was 9.6% (BCVA, 6.6%), 7.7% (BCVA, 4.9%) and 1.9% (BCVA, 1.7%), respectively. Taking the presenting VA, cataract (44%) was the most common cause for visual impairment followed by uncorrected refractive error (24%), treatable causes of visual impairment accounted for 68% of the total cases. Cataract (59%) and glaucoma (15%) were leading causes for blindness based on presenting VA. According to BCVA, cataract was the leading cause of visual impairment and blindness (58% and 60%, respectively), followed by glaucoma (17% and 15%, respectively). The prevalence of visual impairment was higher among women than men (p < 0.0001) and increasing with age (p < 0.0001) and decreasing with increasing education level (p = 0.0075). Conclusion: Visual impairment was a serious public health problem in this rural population, with most of it easily remedied. Results highlighted the need for visual impairment prevention programs to an increasing number of elderly people, with a special emphasis on female and those with little or no education.     

Causes of blindness, low vision, and questionnaire-assessed poor visual function in Singaporean Chinese adults: The Tanjong Pagar Survey

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence rates and causes of low vision, blindness, and patient-assessed deficient visual function among Singaporean Chinese adults. DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Singaporean Chinese adults 40 to 79 years old (n = 1152). METHODS: From an initial sampling frame of 40- to 79-year-old Chinese in the Tanjong Pagar district in Singapore, 2000 subjects were selected using a disproportionate, stratified, clustered, random-sampling method. Of 1717 eligible subjects, 1232 were examined (participation rate = 71.8%), and 80 adults who did not have visual acuity (VA) data were excluded from the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bilateral low vision was defined as best-corrected VA (BCVA) worse than 6/18 and 3/60 or better, and bilateral blindness as BCVA worse than 3/60 in the better eye or constriction of the visual field to within 10 degrees of fixation, in accordance with the World Health Organization criteria. Patient-assessed visual function was measured using a modified VF-14 questionnaire. RESULTS: The age- and gender-adjusted prevalence rates were 1.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-1.8) for bilateral low vision and 0.5% (95% CI, 0.2-1.1) for bilateral blindness, and the mean visual function score was 98.6. The rates of bilateral low vision and blindness increased with age, whereas visual function scores decreased with age, even after adjusting for gender and education. Cataract accounted for 58.8% of bilateral low vision, 20.0% of bilateral blindness, and 52.0% of poor visual function (score<90). Glaucoma contributed to 60.0% of bilateral blindness. CONCLUSION: The age- and gender-adjusted rates of low vision and blindness were 1.1% and 0.5%, respectively. Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness in Singaporean Chinese adults, in addition to well-recognized causes in the rest of Asia such as cataract.     

Incidence of visual impairment due to cataract,diabetic retinopathy and trachoma in indigenous Australians within central Australia: the Central Australian Ocular Health Study

Background: To estimate the incidence and causes of visual impairment for the purposes of service provision among the indigenous Australian population within central Australia from its most common causes, namely cataract, diabetic retinopathy and trachoma. Design: Clinic‐based cohort study. Participants: One thousand eight hundred eighty four individuals aged ≥20 years living in one of 30 remote communities within the statistical local area of ‘Central Australia’. Methods: From those initially recruited, 608 (32%) participants were reviewed again between 6 months and 3 years (median 2 years). Patients underwent Snellen visual acuity testing and subjective refraction. Following this, an assessment of their anterior and posterior segments was made. Baseline results were compared with those who were reviewed. Main Outcome Measures: The annual incidence rates and causes of visual impairment (vision worse than Snellen visual acuity 6/12 in at least one eye). Results: The incidence of visual impairment in at least one eye was 6.6%, 1.2% and 0.7% per year for cataract, diabetic retinopathy and trachoma, respectively (7.9%, 1.5% and 0.7% per year for those aged ≥40 years). Advancing age was the main risk factor common to all three. Conclusion: It is important to be mindful not only of the prevalence of disease in a community but also of the rate at which new cases are occurring when allocating resources to address the ocular health needs of this region. Compared with historical data, diabetic retinopathy is emerging as a new and increasing threat to vision in this population.