Synchronous resection for colorectal liver metastases: The future

Colorectal Cancer is a common malignancy. Many patients have metastatic disease at presentation and a significant proportion subsequently go onto develop metastatic disease, following surgery for the primary disease.     

Systematic review of outcomes of patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastases in the setting of extra hepatic disease

BackgroundSurgical resection for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) can offer patients a significant survival benefit. We hypothesised that patients with CRLM and extra hepatic disease (EHD) undergoing metastasectomy had comparable survival and describe outcomes based on the distribution of metastatic disease.MethodsA systematic search using a predefined registered protocol was undertaken between January 2003 and June 2012. Primary exposure was hepatic resection for CRLM and primary outcome measure was overall survival. Meta-regression techniques were used to analyse differences between patients with and without extra hepatic disease.FindingsFrom a pool of 4996 articles, 50 were retained for data extraction (3481 CRLM patients with EHD). The median survival (MS) was 30.5 (range, 9–98) months which was achieved with an operative mortality rate of 0–4.2%. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 42.4% (range, 20.6–77%) and 28% (range, 0–61%) respectively. Patients with EHD of the lungs had a MS of 45 (range, 39–98) months versus lymph nodes (portal and para-aortic) 26 (range, 21–48) months versus peritoneum 29 (range, 18–32) months. The MS also varied by the amount of liver disease – 42.2 months (<two lesions) versus 39.6 months (two lesions) versus 28 months (⩾three lesions).InterpretationIn the evolving landscape of multimodality therapy, selective hepatic resection for CRLM patients with EHD is feasible with potential impact on survival. Patients with minimal liver disease and EHD in the lung achieve the best outcome.     

Liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases

Questions

1. Should surgery be considered for colorectal cancer (crc) patients who have liver metastases plus (a) pulmonary metastases, (b) portal nodal disease, or (c) other extrahepatic metastases (ehms)?
2. What is the role of chemotherapy in the surgical management of crc with liver metastases in (a) patients with resectable disease in the liver, or (b) patients with initially unresectable disease in the liver that is downsized with chemotherapy (“conversion”)?
3. What is the role of liver resection when one or more crc liver metastases have radiographic complete response (rcr) after chemotherapy?

Perspectives

Advances in chemotherapy have improved survival in crc patients with liver metastases. The 5-year survival with chemotherapy alone is typically less than 1%, although two recent studies with folfox or folfoxiri (or both) reported rates of 5%–10%. However, liver resection is the treatment that is most effective in achieving long-term survival and offering the possibility of a cure in stage iv crc patients with liver metastases. This guideline deals with the role of chemotherapy with surgery, and the role of surgery when there are liver metastases plus ehms. Because only a proportion of patients with crc metastatic disease are considered for liver resection, and because management of this patient population is complex, multidisciplinary management is required.

Methodology

Recommendations in the present guideline were formulated based on a prepublication version of a recent systematic review on this topic. The draft methodology experts, and external review by clinical practitioners. Feedback was incorporated into the final version of the guideline.

Practice Guideline

These recommendations apply to patients with liver metastases from crc who have had or will have a complete (R0) resection of the primary cancer and who are being considered for resection of the liver, or liver plus specific and limited ehms, with curative intent.

• 1(a). Patients with liver and lung metastases should be seen in consultation with a thoracic surgeon. Combined or staged metastasectomy is recommended when, taking into account anatomic and physiologic considerations, the assessment is that all pulmonary metastases can also be completely removed. Furthermore, liver resection may be indicated in patients who have had a prior lung resection, and vice versa.
• 1(b). Routine liver resection is not recommended in patients with portal nodal disease. This group includes patients with radiologically suspicious portal nodes or malignant portal nodes found preoperatively or intraoperatively. Liver plus nodal resection, together with perioperative systemic therapy, may be an option—after a full discussion with the patient—in cases with limited nodal involvement and with metastases that can be completely resected.
• 1(c). Routine liver resection is not recommended in patients with nonpulmonary ehms. Liver plus extrahepatic resection, together with perioperative systemic therapy, may be an option—after a full discussion with the patient—for metastases that can be completely resected.
• 2(a). Perioperative chemotherapy, either before and after resection, or after resection, is recommended in patients with resectable liver metastatic disease. This recommendation extends to patients with ehms that can be completely resected (R0). Risks and potential benefits of perioperative chemotherapy should be discussed for patients with resectable liver metastases. The data on whether patients with previous oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy or a short interval from completion of adjuvant therapy for primary crc might benefit from perioperative chemotherapy are limited.
• 2(b). Liver resection is recommended in patients with initially unresectable metastatic liver disease who have a sufficient downstaging response to conversion chemotherapy. If complete resection has been achieved, postoperative chemotherapy should be considered.
• 3. Surgical resection of all lesions, including lesions with rcr, is recommended when technically feasible and when adequate functional liver can be left as a remnant. When a lesion with rcr is present in a portion of the liver that cannot be resected, surgery may still be a reasonable therapeutic strategy if all other visible disease can be resected. Postoperative chemotherapy might be considered in those patients. Close follow-up of the lesion with rcr is warranted to allow localized treatment or further resection for an in situ recurrence.

     

Selective resection of colorectal liver metastases.

AIMS: Safety of liver surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has to be re-evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred Patients were prospectively analyzed after surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases between 2001 and 2004 at our institution. Special emphasis was given to perioperative morbidity and mortality under modern perioperative care. RESULTS: There was no in-hospital mortality and the perioperative morbidity was 10% (20/200). Four patients had to be reoperated due to bile leak or intraabdominal abscess. The remainder either had infectious complications or pleural effusion and/or ascites requiring tapping. Variables strongly associated with decreased survival were T, N, G and UICC (International Union against cancer) classification of the primary, hepatic lesions>5 cm and elevated tumour markers. Short disease free interval and neoadjuvant chemotherapy without response predicted impaired recurrence free survival (RFS). Multivariate analysis revealed lymph node status and differentiation of the primary, presence of extrahepatic tumour and gender as factors associated with decreased survival. Administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with higher postoperative morbidity or prolonged hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Modern dissection techniques and improved perioperative care contributed to a very low rate of surgery-related morbidity (10%) and a zero percent mortality which was also observed in patients pretreated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection. Liver resection in experienced hands has become a safe part in the potentially curative attempt of treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Prognostic models for outcome following liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases: A systematic review

Background

Liver resection provides the best chance for cure in colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases. A variety of factors that might influence survival and recurrence have been identified. Predictive models can help in risk stratification, to determine multidisciplinary treatment and follow-up for individual patients.

Aims

To systematically review available prognostic models described for outcome following resection of CRC liver metastases and to assess their differences and applicability.

Methods

The Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles proposing a prognostic model or risk stratification system for resection of CRC liver metastases. Search terms included ‘colorectal’, ‘liver’, ‘metastasis’, ‘resection’, ‘prognosis’ and ‘prediction’. The articles were systematically reviewed.

Results

Fifteen prognostic systems were identified, published between 1996 and 2009. The median study population was 305 patients and the median follow-up was 32 months. All studies used Cox proportional hazards for multi-variable analysis. No prognostic factor was common in all models, though there was a tendency towards the number of metastases, CRC spread to lymph nodes, maximum size of metastases, preoperative CEA level and extrahepatic spread as representing independent risk factors. Seven models assigned more weight to selected factors considered of higher predictive value.

Conclusion

The existing predictive models are diverse and their prognostic factors are often not weighed according to their impact. For the development of future predictive models, the complex relations within datasets and differences in relevance of individual factors should be taken into account, for example by using artificial neural networks.     

Management of liver metastases in colorectal cancer patients: A retrospective case-control study of systemic therapy versus liver resection

ObjectiveTo evaluate and compare the overall survival (OS) in case-matched patient groups treated either with systemic therapy or surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).MethodsPatients with CRLM, without extra-hepatic disease, treated with chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy in two phase III studies (n = 480) were selected and case-matched to patients who underwent liver resection (n = 632). Matching criteria were sex, age, established prognostic factors for survival (clinical risk score). Available computed tomography (CT)-scans of patients treated with systemic therapies were reviewed by three independent liver surgeons for resectability. Survival was compared between patients with resectable CRLM (based on CT-scan review) who were treated with systemic therapy versus patients who underwent liver resection.ResultsA total of 96 patients treated with systemic therapy were included. Pre-treatment CT-scans of the liver were available for review in 56 of the systemically treated patients, and metastases were unanimously considered resectable in 36 patients (64.3%) (complex resectable: n = 25; 69%). These 36 patients were case-matched with 36 patients who underwent liver resection (wedge resection or segmentectomy: n = 26; 72%). Median OS in the patient group treated with systemic therapy was 26.5 months (range 0–81 months), which was significantly lower than that in case-matched patients who underwent liver resection (median OS 56 months; range 6–116) (p = 0.027).ConclusionsIn this case-matched control study, surgery provided superior OS rates compared to systemic therapy for CRLM. Resection of CRLM should always be considered, preferably in a dedicated liver centre, since not all patients that qualify for resection are identified as such.     

Surgeon's awareness of the synchronous liver metastases during colorectal cancer resection may affect outcome

Aim

There is conflicting evidence about the importance of synchronous metastases upon tumor outcome. The aim of this study is to identify the effect of finding synchronous colorectal liver metastases on the performance of the surgeon whilst operating on primary colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients with completed colorectal cancer data who underwent liver resection for colorectal metastases between 1993 and 2001 were included. Two hundred seventy patients were categorised according to the site of the primary tumour (colon or rectum) and knowledge of the presence of liver metastases by the colorectal surgeon (SA = surgeon aware, n = 112, SNA = surgeon not aware, n = 158). The number of retrieved lymph nodes and colorectal resection margin involvement were used as surgical performance indicators. Survival and local recurrence rate were monitored.

Results

The SA group had a higher rate of colorectal circumferential resection margin involvement, the local and intra-abdominal recurrence rate was also significantly higher in this group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Awareness of the presence of liver metastases by the operating surgeon is an independent predictor of intra abdominal extra hepatic recurrence of colorectal cancer following potentially curative hepatic resection. This is related to an increased rate of primary colorectal resection margin involvement.     

Surgical treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

Colorectal carcinoma is one of the most frequent cancers in Western societies with an incidence of around 700 per million people.About half of the patients develop metastases from the primary tumor and liver is the primary metastatic site.Improved survival rates after hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer have been reported in the last few years and these may be the result of a variety of factors,such as advances in systemic chemotherapy,radiographic imaging techniques that permit more accurate determination of the extent and location of the metastatic burden,local ablation methods,and in surgical techniques of hepatic resection.These have led to a more aggressive approach towards liver metastatic disease,resulting in longer survival.The goal of this paper is to review the role of various forms of surgery in the treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.     

Outcome following repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.

AIM: Our aim was to determine independent predictors of survival after second liver resection and to confirm whether the type of first resection influences survival after repeat resection. METHODS: Fifty-four patients who underwent a second liver resection for colorectal liver metastases were analyzed. To find independent predictors of survival, possible prognostic factors regarding the primary tumor, and the first and second resections were used in the Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: There were three postoperative deaths within 90 days of surgery. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 53% and 46%, respectively. The size of the tumor (>50mm) (p=0.005), serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (>30microg/L) (p=0.002), and the presence of a positive surgical margin at the second resection (p=0.006) were independent predictors of poor survival following the second resection. The type of first resection was not associated with survival but was associated with the ability to achieve a histological negative surgical margin at the second liver resection (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Three independent predictors of survival were identified. Major initial liver resection was associated with a reduced ability to achieve surgical clearance at the second resection. For colorectal liver metastases, major resection should only be performed if a negative margin cannot be achieved by minor resection.     

Selection for surgery and survival of synchronous colorectal liver metastases; a nationwide study

BackgroundResection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is associated with improved survival but we currently have limited population-based data on selection for surgery.MethodsPatients in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register reported with liver metastases at diagnosis in 2007–2011 were identified. Clinical characteristics including American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, type of hospital and health care region were retrieved. Linkage to the National Patient Register and Statistics Sweden provided information on liver resection and socioeconomic variables.ResultsSynchronous CRLM was found in 4243/27,990 (15.2%) patients, of whom 1094 (25.8%) also had concurrent lung metastases. Of 3149 patients with liver-only metastases, 556 (17.8%) were subjected to liver resection. The resection rate varied by subsite; right-sided 11.7%, left-sided 19.7% and rectal cancer 22.7% (p = 0.001). It varied by type of hospital 14.1–23.6%, by region 11.5–22.7%, and was 19.8% in men and 14.9% in women (all p < 0.001).The adjusted odds were 0.74 (0.59–0.93) for females, 0.58 (0.46–0.74) for general district and 0.50 (0.37–0.68) for district hospital patients, and there were large regional differences. Patients >75 years were very unlikely to receive liver surgery 0.22 (0.15–0.32).In patients subjected to liver surgery, median survival was 57 months, 5-year survival rate was 45.4%, and those with left-sided colon cancer had the best outcome (48.8%; p = 0.02). Five-year hazard ratio for patients not subjected to liver surgery was 4.3 (3.7–5.0).ConclusionNationwide outcome after resection of synchronous CRLM was impressing but ambiguous selection mechanisms and inaccessibility need to be resolved. The implications of subsite deserve further attention.     

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly prevalent malignant disease in industrialized nations. The annual incidence of invasive CRC in the U.S. is among the highest in the world, and the liver is the only metastatic site in approximately one third of patients. Without treatment, patients with metastatic disease have a poor prognosis; however, long-term survival benefits and even cure have been reported in patients undergoing surgical resection of metastases. In addition, advances in chemotherapy, imaging, and surgical techniques have increased the proportion of patients who are eligible for resection. Combination therapy with fluorouracil and leucovorin has been the mainstay of treatment for metastatic CRC; however, the introduction of newer agents, such as oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and targeted agents, such as cetuximab and bevacizumab, has yielded improvements in response rates (RRs) and survival. Maximizing the exposure of hepatic metastases to high target concentrations of cytotoxic drugs using hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) increases RRs further than with systemic chemotherapy; however, the impact of HAI on survival is unclear. As the goals of chemotherapeutic treatment for metastatic CRC increasingly shift from palliation to prolongation of survival, improvement in RRs, and downsizing of tumors in order to enable or optimize resection, treatment in a multidisciplinary environment involving a medical oncologist, radiologist, and surgical oncologist with hepatobiliary expertise will become central to deciding the best course of therapy and timing of surgery.     

Extended preoperative chemotherapy,extent of liver resection and blood transfusion are predictive factors of liver failure following resection of colorectal liver metastasis

Aim

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and prognostic factors of postoperative liver failure in patients submitted to liver resection for colorectal metastases.

Method

Patients with CLM who underwent hepatectomy from 1998 to 2009 were included in retrospective analysis. Postoperative liver failure was defined using either the 50–50 criteria or the peak of serum bilirubin level above 7 mg/dL independently.

Results

Two hundred and nine (209) procedures were performed in 170 patients. 120 surgeries were preceded by chemotherapy within six months. The overall morbidity rate was 53.1% and 90-day mortality was 2.3%. Postoperative liver failure occurred in 10% of all procedures, accounting for a mortality rate of 9.5% among this group of patients. In multivariate analysis, extent of liver resection, need of blood transfusion and more than eight preoperative chemotherapy cycles were independent prognostic factors of postoperative liver insufficiency. This complication was not related with the chemotherapy regimen used.

Conclusion

We conclude that postoperative liver failure has a relatively low incidence (10%) after CLM resection, but a remarkable impact on postoperative mortality rate. The amount of liver resected, the need of blood transfusion and extended preoperative chemotherapy are independent predictors of its occurrence and this knowledge can be used to prevent postoperative liver failure in a multidisciplinary approach.     

结直肠癌肝转移患者行全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助同期切除手术的疗效观察

目的 探讨结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者采用全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助同期切除术治疗的临床疗效比较.方法 选取2010年2月至2015年4月间大连大学附属新华医院收治的68例CRLM同期切除患者,采用随机数表法分为辅助组和全镜组,每组34例.辅助组患者采用腹腔镜结直肠癌(CRC)根治术联合开腹CRLM切除术治疗,全镜组患者采...     

Outcomes following synchronous liver resection,cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases: A bi-institutional study

PurposeSynchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal liver (CRLM) and peritoneal metastases (CRPM) has traditionally been contraindicated. However, latest practice promotes specialist, multidisciplinary-led consideration for select patients. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of synchronous resection in the management of CRLM and CRPM from two tertiary referral centres.MethodThis bi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study included patients undergoing simultaneous liver resection, CRS and HIPEC for metastatic colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020. Patients treated with ablative liver techniques, staged operative approaches and extra abdominal disease were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified variables associated with survival and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV).ResultsTwenty-three patients were included. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 9 (range 0–22). There were two major liver resections and 21 minor resections. CC-0 resections were achieved in all patients. Major morbidity occurred in 7 patients. There were no deaths at 90 days. PCI was independently associated with morbidity (p = 0.04). PCI >10 (p = 0.069), major morbidity (p = 0.083) and presence of KRAS mutation (p = 0.052) approached significance for poor OS. Median follow up was 21 months (4–54 months). Median OS was 37 months, 3-year survival 54%, and median DFS 18 months.ConclusionSynchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is feasible in selected patients with low-volume CRPM and CRLM. Increasing PCI is associated with postoperative major morbidity, and should be considered during operative planning.     

Propensity score matching demonstrates similar results for radiofrequency ablation compared to surgical resection in colorectal liver metastases

PurposeMinimally invasive ablative treatments, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), are increasingly used in the curative treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Selection bias plays an important role in the evaluation of early and late results between RFA and surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate recurrences and oncological survival following these two treatment modalities using single pair propensity score matching.MethodsBetween 2000 and 2018, patients curatively treated for CRLM were included in a multicentre database. Patients were excluded when receiving two-staged treatment, synchronous treatment with primary tumor or combination of modalities. Propensity score matching was used to minimize influence of known covariates, i.e., age, ASA, FONG CRS, location and T-stage of the primary tumor.ResultsBefore matching, the RFA group contained 39 patients and the surgery group 982 patients, after matching both groups contained 36 patients. After matching, mean age was 69 years (53–86) for RFA and 68 (50–86) for surgery, with a mean tumor size of respectively 2.5 cm (0.8–6.5) and 3.4 cm (1–7.5). Both groups showed similar complication rate according to Clavien-Dindo (17vs.33%; p = 0.18), recurrence rate (58vs.64%; p = 0.09) without significant differences in 5-year DFS and OS (RFA compared to surgery respectively 25vs.37%; p = 0.09 and 42vs.53%; p = 0.09).ConclusionAfter propensity score matching, RFA showed lower complications and similar oncological survival compared to surgical resection. In patients who are suboptimal candidates for surgery, RFA seems to be a good and safe alternative.     

Laparoscopic liver resection compared to open approach in patients with colorectal liver metastases improves further resectability: Oncological outcomes of a case-control matched-pairs analysis

Aims

Liver resection is considered the standard treatment of colorectal metastases (CRLM). However, to date, no long term oncological results and data regarding repeat hepatectomy after laparoscopic approach are known. The aim of this study is to analyze single center long-term surgical and oncological outcomes after liver resection for CRLM.

Methods

A total of 57 open resections (OR) were matched with 57 laparoscopic resections (LR) for CRLM. Matching was based mainly on number of metastases, tumor size, segmental position of lesions, type of hepatectomy and type of resection.

Results

Morbidity rate was significantly less in the LR group (p = 0.002); the length of hospital stay was 6.5 ± 5 days for the LR group and 9.2 ± 4 days for the OR group (p = 0.005). After a median follow up of 53.7 months for the OR group and 40.9 months for the LR group, the 5-y overall survival rate was 65% and 60% respectively (p = 0.36) and the 5-y disease free survival rate was 38% and 29% respectively (p = 0.24). More patients in the LR group received a third hepatectomy for CRLM relapse than in the OR group (80% vs. 14.3% respectively; p = 0.015).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic resection for CRLM offers advantages in terms of reduced blood loss, morbidity rate and hospital stay. It provides comparable long-term oncological outcomes but can improve further resectability in patients with recurrent disease.     

Impact of patient,primary tumor and metastatic pattern including tumor location on survival in patients undergoing ablation or resection for colorectal liver metastases: A population-based national cohort study

IntroductionSelecting the optimal treatment strategy for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) aim to improve survival for the total cohort. Following the introduction of laparoscopic resections and ablation, localization may direct choice of method. The aim with this study was to re-evaluate prognostic factors that should be considered at the preoperative multidisciplinary tumor board, based on a national population cohort.Materials and methodsA national cohort with radically operated colorectal cancer in 2009-2013, also treated for CRLM was identified in Swedish national registries. Prognostic factors were identified and evaluated in multivariable analyses.Results1200 patients treated with resection and 125 with ablation only were included in the study cohort. Relative five-year survival was 54.7% (50.9%-58.4%) and 32.0% (22.4%-41.9%), respectively). High age, acute surgery and complications at time of primary tumor resection remained important risk factors at liver surgery, as well as the primary tumor characteristics; vascular invasion and high lymph node ratio. As for metastatic pattern; tumor size, location in segment 4, 6, 7 or 8, multiple metastatic sites and progress after preoperative chemotherapy were significant risk factors. In multivariate analyses, ablation therapy doubled the risk of death within 5 years. This strong negative impact was confirmed in a weighted propensity score analysis (HR = 2.1 (95 % CI 1.5 -3.0)).ConclusionSegmental localization and tumor size were prognostic factors but also patient and primary tumor factors significantly impacted survival after intervention for CRLM. Long-term survival was significantly lower after ablation therapy compared to surgical resection.     

Hepatic vascular inflow occlusion is associated with reduced disease free survival following resection of colorectal liver metastases

Background

Hepatic vascular inflow occlusion (VIO) can be applied during resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) to control intra-operative blood loss, but has been linked to accelerated growth of micrometastases in experimental models. This study aimed to investigate the effects of hepatic VIO on disease-free and overall survival (DFS and OS) in patients following resection for CRLM.

Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on liver resection for colorectal liver metastases

Aim

To compare the effects of preoperative chemotherapy on liver parenchyma morphology, as well as morbidity and mortality after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.

Methods

Prospectively collected data on 173 patients undergoing liver resection for CLM between 1/2003 and 9/2005 was analysed in three groups: A: preoperative oxaliplatin (Ox, n = 70); B: other chemotherapeutic agents (OC, n = 60); and C: surgery alone without chemotherapy (SA, n = 43). Blood transfusion, hospital stay, operative procedure, peak postoperative bilirubin levels, complications and histopathology of the resected liver were compared.

Results

Intra-operative blood transfusion requirement (34%) and biliary complications (16%) was higher in patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (p = 0.01 and p = 0.06, respectively). Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was also associated with sinusoidal dilatation of mild grade in 52.8% vs. 26.6% and 23.3% patients (p = 0.007 and p = 0.004) in other groups, respectively. Steatosis was similarly distributed across the study group. Postoperative mortality was 2, 1 and 4 patients, respectively (p = ns).

Conclusion

Oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemotherapy is associated with vascular alterations in the liver parenchyma without significantly increasing the risk of steatosis, or postoperative morbidity and mortality.