Laparoscopic repair of postoperative perineal hernia

Symptomatic perineal hernia is a rare complication after abdominoperineal resection. Various approaches to surgical repair have been described, including transabdominal, transperineal, and combined abdominoperineal repairs. In this report, we present a laparoscopic approach for repairing a perineal hernia that developed 10 months after laparoscopy-assisted abdominoperineal resection for a recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a laparoscopic repair of perineal hernia.     

Laparoscopic repair of postoperative perineal hernia

Perineal hernia is an uncommon complication of abdominoperineal resection and pelvic exenteration. We present an alternative not previously described for the surgical repair of this type of hernia: laparoscopic repair of postoperative perineal hernia. Electronic Publication     

Laparoscopic repair of postoperative perineal hernia

Background Perineal hernia is an uncommon complication following abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. There are only a few reports concerning the management of this unusual problem. Various methods of repair have been described, but none of them is well established. The purpose of our study is to present our experience and to discuss the pathogenesis and the different surgical repair techniques of these hernias. Methods Between September 2003 and December 2004, four patients with perineal hernia observed several months following laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum were treated. All patients underwent the transabdominal laparoscopic approach using synthetic mesh for repair. Results In all patients, the hernia was repaired by the laparoscopic transabdominal approach using synthetic mesh. The blood loss was minimal and mean operating time was 54 ± 10 min. There were no cases that required conversion to laparotomy and there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Beginning of soft diet intake and ambulation times were on the second day following surgery. The average length of hospital stay was 4 ± 1 days. During 8.3 ± 6 months of follow-up, there was no recurrence of the hernia. Conclusion Perineal hernias are rare complications of major pelvic surgeries. Symptomatic hernias should be repaired surgically. The transabdominal laparoscopic approach using synthetic mesh provides an appropriate solution for these hernias.     

Laparoscopic repair of perineal hernia after abdominoperineal excision

Purpose

Perineal hernia is a challenging complication after abdominoperineal excision (APE) of the rectum. Surgical repair can be accomplished using challenging abdominal or transperineal approaches. A laparoscopic repair using a Proceed mesh might be an easy and effective alternative.

Methods

We describe a multi-center case-series of twelve patients with a symptomatic perineal hernia treated by laparoscopic mesh repair. A cone-shaped 10 × 15 cm Proceed Mesh was tacked to the promontory or sacrum and sutured to the pelvic sidewalls and the anterior peritoneum.

Results

Twelve patients underwent laparoscopic repair of their perineal hernia. Four men and eight women presented with a symptomatic perineal hernia after abdominoperineal excision between 2008 and 2013 and underwent a laparoscopic repair with a Proceed mesh. The median age at presentation was 53 years (range 39–68 years). The mean total theater time was 119 min (range 75–200 min). No conversion to an open procedure was needed. No early complications where seen. The mean hospital stay was 2.25 days (range 1–4 days). Three patients showed recurrence, of whom two had a defect in the middle of the proceed mesh, one had a defect anterior to the previous perineal hernia. All 3 patients underwent a redo-laparoscopic repair with mesh.

Conclusion

In this case series we present an alternative approach for the surgical repair of perineal hernias. Based on our experience, perineal hernia after APE can be repaired safely and effectively using the described laparoscopic technique.

     

Laparoscopic hernia repair

The basis of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (LTPR) of herniae rests upon the utilization of a prosthetic screen to cover hernia defects. Preperitoneal prosthetic screen interposition reproduces the effect of the inguinal shutter mechanism. In this 3-year longitudinal study, one surgeon performed 224 laparoscopic hernia repairs (LTPR) on 164 patients. These patients have been examined postoperatively by that surgeon and a trained research assistant according to an established protocol. Patient mean age was 50.6 years; 45 cases involved bilateral inguinal herniae (21.5%); 20 laparoscopic repairs were for failed open repair (9.6%); and 46 herniae were incarcerated (22%) at the time of laparoscopic repairs. There were no intraoperative complications. Two procedures required conversion to open repair, the first because of uncertainty regarding incarcerated bowel viability and the second for massive abdominal-wall adhesions. Two laparoscopic repairs recurred and required subsequent repair.     

Laparoscopic hernia repair

Summary In this study, 101 consecutive laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs (LTPR) were performed in 62 patients by a single surgeon. The series began in April 1991 and involved repair of 49 direct, 41 indirect, 4 femoral, 3 umbilical, 3 sliding, and 1 incisional hernias. Twelve cases were bilateral, 11 hernias were incarcerated, and 15 hernias were recurrent. There were no intraoperative complications, and none of the procedures required conversion to open surgery. Patients experienced the following post-operative complications: transient testicular pain (1), transient anterior thigh paresthesias (2), urinary retention requiring TURP (1), and hernia recurrences (2). Follow-up has ranged from 6 to 17 months and initial results have been encouraging.     

Laparoscopic repair of a Morgagni-Larrey hernia

Morgagni-Larrey hernia is a congenital type of diaphragmatic hernia. It is quite uncommon, particularly when it occurs on the left side of the diaphragm. This is a report of a case of a large left-side diaphragmatic hernia through the foramen of Morgagni treated by laparoscopy. The hernia was repaired by incorporating and fixing a polypropylene double-filament mesh into the defect, leaving the sac in mediastinum. The patient recovered promptly after the hernia repair, and there was no recurrence or complaints 30 months after surgery. Our conclusion is that laparoscopically repairs of Morgagni hernias with a prosthetic material are a safe and effective treatment. A literature review also shows that laparoscopic techniques are the gold standard in diaphragmatic hernias repairs.     

Laparoscopic repair of a Morgagni hernia

Laparoscopic repair of a diaphragmatic hernia through the right sternocostal foramen of Morgagni in an obese 42-year-old man is described. The indications for surgery were symptoms of strain-induced dyspnea and tightness in the chest. The technique was carried out by incorporating a marlex mesh into the defect and fixing it in place with hernia staples. The patient had an immediate recovery after repair of the hernia and has remained free of recurrence or complaints 9 months after surgery.     

Laparoscopic repair of a paraduodenal hernia

Paraduodenal hernias have traditionally been treated by conventional laparotomy. We report the first case of a left paraduodenal hernia treated laparoscopically. A 44-year-old man was admitted with abdominal pain and nausea. Computed tomography and an upper gastrointestinal series with small-bowel followthrough showed accumulation of the small bowel on the left side of the abdomen. A laparoscopic repair was performed. The small bowel was observed beneath a thin hernia capsule. Approximately 1.5 m of jejunum was easily reduced into the abdominal cavity. The hernia orifice (5-cm diameter) was closed intracorporeally with five interrupted sutures. Good exposure of the operative field is critical to this procedure; poor exposure may limit the applicability of the laparoscopic approach. This minimally invasive operation is currently indicated in nonobstructive paraduodenal hernias, especially on the left. Received: 7 October 1996/Accepted: 11 April 1997     

Recurrent perineal hernia repair: a novel approach

Purpose

Postoperative perineal hernias are rare complications from procedures, which compromise the pelvic floor, mainly abdominoperineal resection, proctocolectomy, and partial or total pelvic exenteration. Surgical repair can be accomplished through abdominal, laparoscopic, or transperineal approaches.

Methods

We present a case report of a 70-year-old man who underwent two prior operations for recurrent perineal hernia and was ultimately successfully treated with a third operation, a synthetic mesh redo procedure that utilized a synthetic mesh system marketed for women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Results

Although there is no "gold standard" for perineal hernia repair, our patient had multiple surgeries employing a variety of approaches. Final success was achieved using a mesh system with improved fixation to secure pelvic ligaments, using an exclusive perineal approach. Now, more than five years following the final surgery, the patient remains symptom free with no clinical evidence of perineal hernia recurrence.

Conclusions

To date, this is the only report of using this mesh system in a male. The advantages of using this mesh system are (1) exclusive perineal approach without the accompanying risks of abdominal or laparoscopic approach; (2) improved fixation of mesh to secure pelvic ligaments; and (3) lightweight, flexible, and large mesh shape that can easily be trimmed to allow versatility in procedures.     

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

Background The recurrence rate after laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernias with paraesophageal involvement (LRHP) is reported to be high. Mesh reinforcement has been proposed with the objective of solving this problem. This study aimed to compare the outcome of LRHP before and after the introduction of mesh reinforcement. Methods Between 1992 and 2003, 56 consecutive patients received LRHP including posterior crurorrhaphy and additional fundoplication. Of these 56 patients, 17 underwent a mesh-reinforced hiatoplasty. Perioperative outcome was assessed retrospectively, and follow-up assessment was performed according to protocol including a barium contrast swallow. Results The follow-up period averaged 52 ± 31 months (range, 9–117 months). The recurrence rate for hiatal hernia without mesh reinforcement was 19% (7/36). No recurrence (0/16) was observed in patients with mesh reinforcement. The intraoperative complication rate was 9%, and the perioperative morbidity rate was 14%. There were neither mesh-related complications nor operation-related deaths. Conclusions Although challenging, LRPH is a successful procedure. The high recurrence rate reported in the literature can be reduced by additional mesh reinforcement.     

Laparoscopic paracecal hernia repair

The diagnosis and treatment of internal abdominal hernia usually require laparotomy. We report a case of preoperative diagnosis and laparoscopic repair of paracecal hernia. A 90-year-old woman was referred with features of a well-established small bowel obstruction (SBO). Computed tomography and a small bowel contrast examination showed a paracecal hernia. With the patient under general anesthesia, laparoscopic surgery was carried out with the use of pneumoperitoneum, and an easy reduction of the incarcerated intestinal loop was achieved by gentle traction of the intestine. The bowel was assessed for viability and showed no evidence of nonviability. The abnormal orifice in the paracecal region was observed. The orifice was closed with 3-0 PDS II (polydiaxonone) sutures laparoscopically. A laparotomy was avoided, and the patient recovered without significant complications. We conclude that laparoscopy can play a useful role in the treatment of internal hernia causing SBO when an obstructive lesion has been detected and decompression accomplished preoperatively.     

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Background: We performed a prospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hernia repair in our hospital. Methods: A total of 2500 consecutive laparoscopic transabdominal hernia repairs (TAPP) were performed in 1952 patients. Their average age was 59 years. We used a mesh. 12 × 15cm. Results: The average operating time was 32 mins. We had a recurrence rate of 1.04%. There were 89 complications (3.56%). Three were bladder injuries, one of which necessitated conversion to an open laparotomy. Three of 38 hematomas required open exploration. Three patients were reoperated because of nerve irritation. An incarcerated trocar hernia occurred in six cases. There was one wound infection at the umbilical incision. There were no infections or incompatibility reactions at the mesh. The complication rate declined over time. At the same time, the rate of recurrence decreased as we acquired more experience in laparoscopic hernia repair. Conclusion: Laparoscopic hernia repair can be performed safely, with low rates of recurrences and few complications are low. This technique achieves good results combined with the benefits of minimal invasive procedures. apd: 13 March 2001     

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair

Background Management of the parastomal hernia represents a common clinical dilemma for both the surgeon and patient. Once established, these defects are notoriously difficult to treat. Although most parastomal hernias can be managed nonoperatively, approximately 30% will require intervention secondary to complications such as obstruction, pain, bleeding, poorly fitting appliances, or leakage. Overall complication rates of up to 88%, combined with a growing body of literature citing decreased patient morbidity and improved outcomes with laparoscopic tension-free mesh repair of ventral hernias, have led many surgeons to apply these techniques to this difficult problem. Methods This was a retrospective review of 21 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of their parastomal hernias with ePTFE mesh. Results Nine (43%) were ileal conduits, seven (33%) were ileostomies, and five (24%) were colostomies. Eight patients had undergone prior hernia repair. Follow-up ranges from 1 to 36 months (average 14 months). There has been one recurrence (5%). Other complications included laparoscopic re-operation for obstruction of a urinary conduit (n = 1), mesh removal for infection (n = 2), Clostridium Difficile colitis (n = 1), pneumonia (n = 2), renal failure (n = 1), surgical site infection (n = 1), and bowel obstruction at a site remote from the hernia repair (n = 2). Conclusion The laparoscopic approach to parastomal hernias is a new technique that offers many potential advantages over conventional open repairs. Based on our initial experience, this repair seems to be associated with a low recurrence rate. Poster presentation at Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, April 18–22, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.     

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

The safest and most effective inguinal hernia repair (laparoscopic versus open mesh) is being debated. As the authors point out, the former accounts for the minority of hernia repairs performed in the United States and around the world. The reasons for this are a demonstration in the literature of increased operative times, increased costs, and a longer learning curve. But the laparoscopic approach has clear advantages, including less acute and chronic postoperative pain, shorter convalescence, and earlier return to work. This article describes the transabdominal preperitoneal and totally extraperitoneal techniques, provides indications and contraindications for laparoscopic repair, discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, and provides an overview of the literature comparing tension-free open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.     

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

Ventral hernias, whether naturally occurring or the result of previous surgery, comprise one of the most common problems confronting general surgeons. As many as 25% of laparotomy incisions develop a hernia over long-term follow-up, which is a difficult problem with many treatment algorithms. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has improved over the last decade and has proven to be an effective treatment option. With fewer wound complications and low recurrence rates, it is a useful tool in the surgeon’s armamentarium. Care should be taken regarding patient selection, operative technique, and mesh size to ensure adequate repair of the hernia, thereby preventing recurrence at a later date. The first attempt at a hernia repair has the highest chance of long-term success, so it is important that the surgeon take all the factors into mind before proceeding with operative repair.     

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair

Repair of parastomal represents a significant challenge for the hernia surgeon. Repair of these hernias is indicated because of an ill-fitting appliance, cosmetic deformity, inability to maintain proper hygiene and complications from the hernia itself such as incarceration or strangulation. Recent reports in the literature have shown that primary fascial repair can occur in 46% of patients and relocation of the stoma is associated with a 40% recurrence rate. For this reason, the use of polypropylene mesh has been applied to this repair. The recurrence rate with this open technique will still incur a failure rate of 20–29%. Additionally there are other complications such as obstruction, fistulization or mesh erosion with this biomaterial. The laparoscopic approach to this hernia may offer a new choice for this difficult problem. We have used ePTFE to repair 12 parastomal hernias with three different approaches. There have been eight colostomy, two ileostomy and two urostomy hernias. Follow-up ranges from 3–39 months (average 20 months). There has been one recurrence that required two repairs (8%). Other complications included enterotomy (one patient), ileus (one), seroma (one), and death from postoperative aspiration (one). The laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias appears to be a promising technique for this complex dilemma.Presented at the meeting of the American Hernia Society, Orlando, FL, February 2004