共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
早在古希腊时期,医护工作者已经意识到温度的提高和人体疾病状态有着密切关系,然而,至今,有关体温测量的方法选择、准确性、临床操作等问题仍然一直普遍存在。水银的毒性及玻璃的易碎性使得人们对传统水银玻璃体温计产生了质疑,而在欧洲,医疗卫生机构规定在2012年将限制水银玻璃体温计的生产与使用。可见,随着社会经济的发展以及人们对健康需求的提高,作为临床最普遍的评估方法,体温测量方法也有了更高的要求,而本文就想以此为线索,搜寻有关体温测量方法选择与应用的相关证据,为临床护理工作者提供参考。 相似文献
6.
Davidson JE Powers K Hedayat KM Tieszen M Kon AA Shepard E Spuhler V Todres ID Levy M Barr J Ghandi R Hirsch G Armstrong D;American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force - Society of Critical Care Medicine 《Critical care medicine》2007,35(2):605-622
OBJECTIVE: To develop clinical practice guidelines for the support of the patient and family in the adult, pediatric, or neonatal patient-centered ICU. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary task force of experts in critical care practice was convened from the membership of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) to include representation from adult, pediatric, and neonatal intensive care units. EVIDENCE: The task force members reviewed the published literature. The Cochrane library, Cinahl, and MedLine were queried for articles published between 1980 and 2003. Studies were scored according to Cochrane methodology. Where evidence did not exist or was of a low level, consensus was derived from expert opinion. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The topic was divided into subheadings: decision making, family coping, staff stress related to family interactions, cultural support, spiritual/religious support, family visitation, family presence on rounds, family presence at resuscitation, family environment of care, and palliative care. Each section was led by one task force member. Each section draft was reviewed by the group and debated until consensus was achieved. The draft document was reviewed by a committee of the Board of Regents of the ACCM. After steering committee approval, the draft was approved by the SCCM Council and was again subjected to peer review by this journal. CONCLUSIONS: More than 300 related studies were reviewed. However, the level of evidence in most cases is at Cochrane level 4 or 5, indicating the need for further research. Forty-three recommendations are presented that include, but are not limited to, endorsement of a shared decision-making model, early and repeated care conferencing to reduce family stress and improve consistency in communication, honoring culturally appropriate requests for truth-telling and informed refusal, spiritual support, staff education and debriefing to minimize the impact of family interactions on staff health, family presence at both rounds and resuscitation, open flexible visitation, way-finding and family-friendly signage, and family support before, during, and after a death. 相似文献
7.
Zhao H Heard SO Mullen MT Crawford S Goldberg RJ Frendl G Lilly CM 《Critical care medicine》2012,40(6):1700-1706
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
End-of-life care in the intensive care unit (ICU) was identified as an objective in a series of Task Forces developed by the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine Council in 2014.The objective was to develop a generic statement about current knowledge and to identify challenges relevant to the global community that may inform regional and local initiatives.An updated summary of published statements on end-of-life care in the ICU from national Societies is presented, highlighting commonalities and differences within and between international regions.The complexity of end-of-life care in the ICU, particularly relating to withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment while ensuring the alleviation of suffering, within different ethical and cultural environments is recognized.Although no single statement can therefore be regarded as a criterion standard applicable to all countries and societies, the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine endorses and encourages the role of Member Societies to lead the debate regarding end-of-life care in the ICU within each country and to take a leading role in developing national guidelines and recommendations within each country. 相似文献
13.
Maccioli GA Dorman T Brown BR Mazuski JE McLean BA Kuszaj JM Rosenbaum SH Frankel LR Devlin JW Govert JA Smith B Peruzzi WT;American College of Critical Care Medicine Society of Critical Care Medicine 《Critical care medicine》2003,31(11):2665-2676
OBJECTIVE: To develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of restraining therapies to maintain physical and psychological safety of adult and pediatric patients in the intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary, multispecialty task force of experts in critical care practice was convened from the membership of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN). EVIDENCE: The task force members reviewed the published literature (MEDLINE articles, textbooks, etc.) and provided expert opinion from which consensus was derived. Relevant published articles were reviewed individually for validity using the Cochrane methodology (http://hiru.mcmaster.ca/cochrane/ or www.cochrane.org). CONSENSUS PROCESS: The task force met as a group and by teleconference to identify the pertinent literature and derive consensus recommendations. Consideration was given to both the weight of scientific information within the literature and expert opinion. Draft documents were composed by a task force steering committee and debated by the task force members until consensus was reached by nominal group process. The task force draft then was reviewed, assessed, and edited by the Board of Regents of the ACCM. After steering committee approval, the draft document was reviewed and approved by the SCCM Council. CONCLUSIONS: The task force developed nine recommendations with regard to the use of physical restraints and pharmacologic therapies to maintain patient safety in the intensive care unit. 相似文献
14.
Djillali Annane Stephen M. Pastores Wiebke Arlt Robert A. Balk Albertus Beishuizen Josef Briegel Joseph Carcillo Mirjam Christ-Crain Mark S. Cooper Paul E. Marik Gianfranco Umberto Meduri Keith M. Olsen Bram Rochwerg Sophia C. Rodgers James A. Russell Greet Van den Berghe 《Intensive care medicine》2017,43(12):1781-1792
Objective
To provide a narrative review of the latest concepts and understanding of the pathophysiology of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI).Participants
A multispecialty task force of international experts in critical care medicine and endocrinology and members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).Data sources
Medline, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.Results
Three major pathophysiologic events were considered to constitute CIRCI: dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, altered cortisol metabolism, and tissue resistance to glucocorticoids. The dysregulation of the HPA axis is complex, involving multidirectional crosstalk between the CRH/ACTH pathways, autonomic nervous system, vasopressinergic system, and immune system. Recent studies have demonstrated that plasma clearance of cortisol is markedly reduced during critical illness, explained by suppressed expression and activity of the primary cortisol-metabolizing enzymes in the liver and kidney. Despite the elevated cortisol levels during critical illness, tissue resistance to glucocorticoids is believed to occur due to insufficient glucocorticoid alpha-mediated anti-inflammatory activity.Conclusions
Novel insights into the pathophysiology of CIRCI add to the limitations of the current diagnostic tools to identify at-risk patients and may also impact how corticosteroids are used in patients with CIRCI.15.
The role of the critical care specialist has been unequivocally established in the management of severely ill patients throughout the world. Data show that the presence of a critical care specialist in the intensive care unit (ICU) environment has reduced morbidity and mortality, improved patient safety, and reduced length of stay and costs. However, many ICUs across the world function as “open ICUs,” in which patients may be admitted under a primary physician who has not been trained in critical care medicine. Although the concept of the ICU has gained widespread acceptance amongst medical professionals, hospital administrators and the general public; recognition and the need for doctors specializing in intensive care medicine has lagged behind. The curriculum to ensure appropriate training around the world is diverse but should ideally meet some minimum standards. The World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine has set up a task force to address issues concerning the training, functions, roles, and responsibilities of an ICU specialist. 相似文献
16.
Miguel A Qui?ones Pamela S Douglas Elyse Foster John Gorcsan Jannet F Lewis Alan S Pearlman Jack Rychik Ernesto E Salcedo James B Seward J Geoffrey Stevenson Daniel M Thys Howard H Weitz William A Zoghbi Mark A Creager William L Winters Michael Elnicki John W Hirshfeld Beverly H Lorell George P Rodgers Cynthia M Tracy Howard H Weitz 《Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography》2003,16(4):379-402
17.
18.
19.
Gosselink R Bott J Johnson M Dean E Nava S Norrenberg M Schönhofer B Stiller K van de Leur H Vincent JL 《Intensive care medicine》2008,34(7):1188-1199
The Task Force reviewed and discussed the available literature on the effectiveness of physiotherapy for acute and chronic critically ill adult patients. Evidence from randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses was limited and most of the recommendations were level C (evidence from uncontrolled or nonrandomized trials, or from observational studies) and D (expert opinion). However, the following evidence-based targets for physiotherapy were identified: deconditioning, impaired airway clearance, atelectasis, intubation avoidance, and weaning failure. Discrepancies and lack of data on the efficacy of physiotherapy in clinical trials support the need to identify guidelines for physiotherapy assessments, in particular to identify patient characteristics that enable treatments to be prescribed and modified on an individual basis. There is a need to standardize pathways for clinical decision-making and education, to define the professional profile of physiotherapists, and increase the awareness of the benefits of prevention and treatment of immobility and deconditioning for critically ill adult patients. 相似文献