Automated programs for collection of mononuclear cells and progenitor cells by two separators for peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: comparison by a randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND: Although automated programs have been increasingly used to collect peripheral blood (PB) progenitor cells (PBPCs), differences among them remain unclear. The automated programs of Amicus (Baxter Healthcare) and Spectra (software Version 6.1, Gambro BCT) apheresis machines were compared in a crossover study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The patients for autologous and donors for allogeneic PBPC transplantation mobilized with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor were randomly assigned into two groups. PBPCs were collected by the Amicus on the first day and the Spectra on the second of 2 consecutive days in Group I, and the reverse order was used in Group II. Of 39 patients or donors enrolled, 17 reached their collection goal with only one procedure and did not participate in the paired study. Thus, 44 paired procedures of the remaining 22 subjects were evaluated. RESULTS: The product yields of white blood cells (WBCs; p < 0.005), mononuclear cells (MNCs; p < 0.02), and CD34+ PBPCs (p < 0.0002) from patients or donors were higher in the Amicus collections than those in the Spectra collections. The collection efficiencies of WBCs (p < 0.03), MNCs (p < 0.02), and CD34+ PBPCs (p < 0.03) were higher in the Amicus collections. The numbers of contaminating platelets (PLTs) in the Amicus collections were lower than those in the Spectra collections (p < 0.05) with a greater decrease in PB PLT counts after apheresis with the Spectra (p < 0.01). The Amicus had a longer running time than the Spectra for processing similar volumes (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The automated program of the Amicus may be better than that of the Spectra for collecting MNCs and CD34+ PBPCs and avoiding apheresis-induced thrombocytopenia.     

In vitro collection and posttransfusion engraftment characteristics of MNCs obtained by using a new separator for autologous PBPC transplantation

BACKGROUND: A clinical study was performed to evaluate the peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection, transfusion, and engraftment characteristics associated with use of a blood cell separator (Amicus, Baxter Healthcare). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Oncology patients (n = 31) scheduled for an autologous PBPC transplant following myeloablative therapy were studied. PBPCs were mobilized by a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens and the use of G-CSF. As no prior studies evaluated whether PBPCs collected on the Amicus separator would be viable after transfusion, to ensure patient safety, PBPCs were first collected on another cell separator (CS-3000 Plus, Baxter) and stored as backup. The day after the CS-3000 Plus collections were completed, PBPC collections intended for transfusion were performed using the Amicus instrument. For each transplant, >2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ PBPCs per kg of body weight were transfused. RESULTS: Clinical data collected on the donors immediately before and after PBPC collection with the Amicus device were comparable to donor data similarly obtained for the CS-3000 Plus collections. While the number of CD34+ cells and the RBC volume in the collected products were equivalent for the two devices, the platelet content of the Amicus collections was significantly lower than that of the CS-3000 Plus collections (4.35 x 10(10) platelets/bag vs. 6.61 x 10(10) platelets/bag, p<0.05). Collection efficiencies for CD34+ cells were 64 +/- 23 percent for the Amicus device and 43 +/- 14 percent for the CS-3000 Plus device (p<0.05). The mean time to engraftment for cells collected via the Amicus device was 8.7 +/- 0.7 days for >500 PMNs per microL and 9.7 +/- 1.5 days to attain a platelet count of >20,000 per microL-equivalent to data in the literature. No CS-3000 Plus backup cells were transfused and no serious adverse events attributable to the Amicus device were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: The mean Amicus CD34+ cell collection efficiency was better (p<0.05) than that of the CS-3000 Plus collection. Short-term engraftment was durable. The PBPCs collected with the Amicus separator are safe and effective for use for autologous transplant patients requiring PBPC rescue from high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy.     

Apheresis-induced platelet activation:comparison of three types of cell separators

BACKGROUND: Platelet-harvesting technology differs in various cell separators. Alteration in shear stress and biocompatibility of surfaces may give variable platelet activation and thereby affect the quality of the component. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Four groups (n = 10) of single-needle apheresis procedures using three cell separators, were compared: 1) Spectra LRS, 90-minute harvesting time; 2) MCS+, 90-minute harvest; 3) Amicus, 90-minute; and 4) Amicus, 45-minute. Whole-blood samples were collected from the donors as were samples from the final components at intervals during the first 4 hours after cessation of the apheresis. Platelet activation status and platelet activation capacity after agonist stimulation were assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: No activated platelets were found in preapheresis and postapheresis samples from the donors. The platelets in the components from the Amicus (90-min) were significantly more activated than those in the other groups of components: that is, there was increased size of platelet aggregates, increased fraction of microparticles, increased degranulation, increased fibrinogen receptor activation, and decreased von Willebrand factor receptor expression. Moreover, the response of these platelets to agonist stimulation was reduced for all activation variables. CONCLUSIONS: After 90 minutes' processing time, platelets obtained with the Amicus cell separator were significantly more activated than platelets harvested with the Spectra and the MCS+.     

WBC subset analysis of WBC-reduced platelet components

BACKGROUND: WBC-reduced platelet components may be prepared by filtration or apheresis processing. Both methods have previously been shown to result in a residual total WBC content <5 x 10(6) per component. However, there may be differences in the efficacy of these techniques for removing certain WBC subsets. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two multiparameter flow cytometric assays were developed and validated to perform WBC analysis on WBC-reduced platelets collected with two apheresis instruments (Amicus and COBE Spectra) and on 6 units of filtered pooled random-donor platelet concentrates. RESULTS: All components contained <1 x 10(5) WBCs. The COBE Spectra and Amicus apheresis platelet components contained more WBCs than did filtered pooled platelets (p<0.05). Lymphocytes (T and B), monocytes, and granulocytes were identified in all components. Granulocyte content was lowest in the Amicus components and filtered pools. Monocytes were lowest in filtered pools. Amicus platelet components had fewer granulocytes and monocytes than the COBE Spectra platelets. Amicus and COBE Spectra components contained more lymphocytes than the filtered pools. CONCLUSION: Multiparameter flow cytometry can be used to quantify and characterize WBCs in WBC-reduced platelet components. WBC reduction by filtration or apheresis was highly effective. WBCs from each subset were identified in all components. Although filtered pools had the lowest numbers of WBCs, the very low numbers observed in all components suggests that the absolute quantitative differences in WBC subset content are of questionable clinical significance.     

Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells with an automated leukapheresis system

BACKGROUND: Apheresis devices designed for the collection of mature blood elements are being used for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs).The collection of PBPCs differs from that of other cells in the rarity of the target cell and in the fact that donors may undergo several days of collection. A consequence of this process may be a depletion of blood cells such as platelets from the blood. The disposable set and operating software for an apheresis device (Spectra, COBE BCT) was modified by the manufacturer to automate the collection of PBPCs and reduce the collection of unwanted blood cells. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A study was initiated to compare the collection of PBPCs with the new device, the AutoPBSC (version [V]6.0 with AutoPBSC tubing set), and that with the MNC (mononuclear cell) procedure (V4.7 with white cell tubing set), for patients and healthy donors. RESULTS: Patients whose blood was processed by either theV6.0 orV4.7 procedure achieved the target dose of 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of patient weight in similar numbers of procedures, even though the calculated collection efficiency for CD34+ cells using the automated V6.0 procedure was significantly less than that with the V4.7 procedure for both allogeneic donors and patients donating PBPCs. The collection efficiency for platelets was lower with the V6.0 procedure, and components collected in this manner contained fewer platelets. Apheresis by the V6.0 procedure required 30 to 60 more minutes per procedure than apheresis by the V4.7 procedure. Review of engraftment kinetics after transplantation did not reveal any effect of the collection procedure on recipients of either allogeneic or autologous transplants. CONCLUSION: The collection efficiencies of the V6.0 procedure for both CD34+ cells and mature blood cells are lower than those of the V4.7 procedure.The lower collection efficiency for platelets results in a smaller drop in peripheral blood platelet count after the procedure.The automated features of the V6.0 procedure may simplify PBPC collection, but this procedure requires a longer apheresis.     

African American adult apheresis donors respond to granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor with neutrophil and progenitor cell yields comparable to those of Caucasian and Hispanic donors

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF)‐mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are the most common source of cells used for hematopoietic transplantation. Benign ethnic neutropenia has been found in persons of African descent, affecting circulating white blood cells (WBCs), but not WBC production within marrow. Persons of African descent have reduced neutrophil mobilization after steroid administration, and newborns have fewer nucleated and progenitor cells in their cord blood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty‐two African American (AA) and 12 Hispanic PBPC donors were age, sex, and weight matched with 34 Caucasian donors. Groups were compared based on WBC and neutrophil counts after mobilization and numbers of CD34+ cells collected on Day 5 of G‐CSF mobilization. RESULTS: AA donors had significantly lower baseline WBC (6.1 ± 1.1 vs. 7.1 ± 1.7, p = 0.04) and neutrophil (3.4 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 1.3, p = 0.01) counts compared to matched Caucasian donors. G‐CSF–stimulated AAs had a significantly greater increase in WBC and neutrophil counts compared to matched Caucasians (889 ± 293% vs. 665 ± 230% neutrophils, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in product cell counts when comparing total nucleated, CD3+, CD34+, and mononuclear cells or colony‐forming units (CFUs) between Caucasians and Hispanics or AAs and trends to greater numbers of neutrophils in products from AA donors. CONCLUSION: When stimulated by G‐CSF, AAs are able to increase WBC and neutrophil counts to a higher degree than Caucasians, achieving similar numbers of neutrophil and progenitor cells in apheresis products despite starting from lower baseline blood counts.     

Comparison of Amicus and COBE Spectra for allogenic peripheral blood stem cell harvest: Study from tertiary care centre in India

Introduction

Most common source of stem cell graft for both autologous and allogenic haematopoietic transplants are peripheral blood haematopoietic progenitor stem cells. Adequate collection of the CD34+ cells and safety of the allogenic donor during the leukapheresis are of prime importance to an apheresis physician. Our retrospective analysis is a comparison between of two platforms namely, COBE Spectra and Amicus, for CD34+ mononuclear cell collection.

Peripheral blood circulating immature cell counts predict CD34+ cell yields in G-CSF-induced PBPC mobilization in healthy donors

BACKGROUND: It has been previously reported that the number of circulating immature cells (CIC) in peripheral blood (PB) estimates the number of CD34+ cells collected in G-CSF plus chemotherapy-induced PBPC mobilization. The correlation of CIC counts in PB with CD34+ cell yield and its usefulness was evaluated in G-CSF-induced PBPC mobilization for healthy donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: CIC counts in PB and CD34+ cell counts in the apheresis product from 122 collections were assessed, and the relationship between these two variables was evaluated with the Pearson rank correlation analysis, the chi-squared test, and the U-test. RESULTS: CIC counts were correlated weakly with the number of CD34+ cells per L of blood processed in the apheresis product (Pearson rank correlation analysis; r=0.357, p<0.0001). When a level of 1.7 x 10(9) CICs per L was selected as a cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity for collecting more than 20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per L of blood processed were 63.6 and 77.5 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that the number of CICs in PB may estimate the number of CD34+ cells collected. The data indicate that CIC counts above 1.7 x 10(9) per L can be used as a good predictor for PBPC collections containing more than 20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per L of blood processed in a single apheresis procedure.     

Evaluation of the Amicus Separator in the collection of apheresis platelets

BACKGROUND: A new apheresis instrument, the Amicus Separator with software versions 2.13 and 2.34, was evaluated for component yields, collection efficiency, and incidence of donor and transfusion recipient reactions. The Amicus was also compared to the Spectra Leukocyte Reduction System (LRS) with version 5 software. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Single and double apheresis platelets (APs) were collected at two locations. The targeted platelet yields were 4.0 × 10(11) for single APs and 6.8 × 10(11) for double APs. One location used a double- needle procedure, and the other used a single-needle procedure. Along with 28 of the Amicus procedures (14 at each of two locations), the same donors underwent single or double AP collections on the Spectra LRS. APs were tested for platelet yields and residual white cells. APs were transfused in three hospitals. Donor and transfusion recipient reactions and technical problems were documented. RESULTS: The Amicus Separator efficiently collected single APs (n = 59) and double APs (n = 62) with mean platelet yields of 4.2 × 10(11) and 6.5 × 10(11), respectively. When inlet line alarms occurred in single-needle procedures, platelet yields were lower and collection times were longer. All APs were white cell-reduced below 5.0 × 10(6), and all but one AP were white cell-reduced below 1.0 × 10(6) without filtration. Component yields from the paired Amicus and Spectra LRS procedures were comparable. Collection times (excluding reinfusion/rinseback) were 20 to 23 minutes faster on the Amicus Separator. No serious donor or transfusion recipient reactions occurred. CONCLUSION: The Amicus Separator provided satisfactory platelet yields and collection efficiency, with shorter collection times than did the Spectra LRS, and it white cell-reduced components without filtration.     

Recommendations for optimized settings of the Amicus Crescendo cell separator for the collection of CD34+ progenitor cells

BACKGROUND: CD34+ PBPCs for autologous transplantation purposes are collected by leukapheresis procedures on automated cell separators. In this study, the influence of different parameters on collection efficiency (CE) of the Amicus Crescendo cell separator (Baxter) was investigated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 146 PBPC collections with Amicus cell separators were performed in 56 patients with either settings recommended by the manufacturer or modified settings to identify variables that have a significant and important impact on CE. RESULTS: By use of a standard setting with a cycle volume of 1400 mL, CE significantly decreases when patients' preapheresis peripheral blood WBC counts are between 25,000 and 35,000 per micro L. CE can be improved if cycle volume is reduced to 1000 mL. If WBC concentrations exceed 55,000 per micro L before apheresis, CE also significantly decreases despite of reduced cycle volume. Additionally, high flow rates greater than 60 mL per minute significantly reduce CE. CONCLUSION: Parameters influencing the outcome of CD34+ PBPC collections were identified, such as patients' WBC count, cycle volume, and whole blood flow rate. An optimized adjustment of these variables will further increase the CE of the device.     

G-CSF-induced spleen size changes in peripheral blood progenitor cell donors

BACKGROUND: PBPC donors given G-CSF experience splenic enlargement and, rarely, spontaneous rupture of the spleen. This study evaluated the incidence and time course of splenic enlargement in PBPC concentrate donors and assessed factors affecting size changes. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty healthy adults were given G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day) for 5 days and a PBPC concentrate was collected by apheresis. Ultrasound was used to assess craniocaudal spleen length before giving G-CSF, on the day of apheresis and 3 or 4 days after apheresis. The effects of donor age, gender, race, and changes in blood chemistries, blood counts, and CD34+ cell counts on spleen length change were assessed. RESULTS: Spleen length increased in 19 of 20 donors. Mean length changed from 10.9 +/- 2.0 cm before G-CSF to 12.3 +/- 2.1 cm on the day of apheresis (p < 0.001). The mean increase in length was 1.5 +/- 0.9 cm or 13.8 +/- 9.1 percent. Spleen length increased 20 percent or more in six subjects. The spleen length fell to 11.3 +/- 1.8 cm (p < 0.001) 3 or 4 days after apheresis, but it remained greater than baseline levels (p = 0.03). Spleen length change was not affected by donor gender, race, or age. There was no relationship between changes in spleen length and 1) baseline and apheresis-day blood counts and chemistries, or 2) changes in blood counts and chemistries. CONCLUSIONS: Spleen size increases in almost all PBPC donors. Enlargement is transient but may be marked in some donors and may place them at risk for splenic rupture.     

Pediatric peripheral blood progenitor cell collection: haemonetics MCS 3P versus COBE Spectra versus Fresenius AS104

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of apheresis machines are becoming available for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection in children. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: At the Children's Hospital of Florence (Italy), three apheresis machines were evaluated: MCS 3P (Haemonetics) (10 procedures in 4 patients, aged 10–12 years, weight 23.5-64 kg), Spectra, (COBE) (8 procedures in 3 patients, aged 4–17 years, weight 19–59 kg), and AS104 (Fresenius) (24 procedures in 9 patients, aged 2–16 years, weight 13.6-60 kg). For PBPC quantitative analysis, CD34 cytofluorimetry was employed. Relevant variables analyzed included efficiency of CD34+ cell extraction and enrichment, mononuclear cell purity and red cell contamination of the apheresis components, and platelet count decreases after leukapheresis. RESULTS: No significant differences in CD34+ cell-extraction abilities were found. However, the AS104 provided consistently purer leukapheresis components in terms of mononuclear cell and CD34+ cell enrichment (441 +/− 59%, vs. 240 +/− 35% and 290 +/− 42% for MCS 3P and Spectra, respectively). Postapheresis platelet counts dropped the least with the AS104. The smallest patient who underwent apheresis with MCS 3P (the only machine working on discontinuous flow and hence with greater volume shifts) weighed 23.5 kg and tolerated the procedure well, with no signs of hemodynamic instability. No significant complications were observed. CONCLUSION: All machines seem to have comparable PBPC extraction efficiency, but the AS104 seems to give the component with the greatest PBPC enrichment. This feature might be relevant for further ex vivo cell processing (CD34+ cell selection, expansion, and so on).     

两种血细胞分离机干/祖细胞采集和移植效果的比较

背景：外周血造血干/祖细胞通过血细胞分离机进行体外收集,血细胞分离机的性能、工作状况将直接关系到采集物的特性和数量,从而直接影响受者的造血重建。目的：比较Fenwal CS-3000Plus与Amicus两种血细胞分离机采集外周血造血干/祖细胞及受者移植效果。方法：共入选接受异基因外周血干细胞移植患者51例,Fenwal CS-3000Plus组27例,平均年龄（34.2±10.6）岁;Amicus组24例,平均年龄（35.4±12.1）岁。比较两组采集物有核细胞数、CD34＋细胞数、采集效率、红细胞与血小板采集量及造血重建时间。结果与结论：两组采集物的有核细胞数、CD34＋细胞数、采集效率、红细胞采集量及造血重建时间差异均无显著性意义;Fenwal CS-3000Plus组血小板采集量明显高于Amicus组（P〈0.01）。结果显示Fenwal CS-3000Plus与Amicus血细胞分离机在分离外周血干/祖细胞方面和移植效果没有差异;血小板较低被采集者使用Amicus血细胞分离机采集可能更为安全。     

Comparison of the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec cell separators for autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection.

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) are commonly used as a stem cell source for autologous transplantation. This study was undertaken to evaluate blood cell separators with respect to separation results and content of the harvest. Forty autologous PBPC collections in patients with hematological malignancies were performed with either the Amicus or the COM.TEC cell separators. The median product volume was lower with the Amicus compared to the COM.TEC (125 mL vs. 300 mL; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the median number of CD34+ cell/kg in product between the Amicus and the COM.TEC (3.0 x 10(6) vs. 4.1 x 10(6); p = 0.129). There was a statistically higher mean volume of ACD used in collections on the Amicus compared to the COM.TEC (1040 +/- 241 mL vs. 868 +/- 176 mL; p = 0.019). There was a statistical difference in platelet (PLT) contamination of the products between the Amicus and the COM.TEC (0.3 x 10(11) vs. 1.1 x 10(11); p < 0.001). The median % decrease in PB PLT count was statistically higher in the COM.TEC compared to the Amicus instruments (18.5% vs. 9.5%; p = 0.028). In conclusion, both instruments collected PBPCs efficiently. However, Amicus has the advantage of lower PLT contamination in the product, and less decrease in PB platelet count with lower product volume in autologous setting.     

Platelet Recruitment during Multiple Donor Platelet Apheresis Differs between Cell Separators

SUMMARY: BACKGROUND: Recruitment of platelets (PLT) during donor PLT apheresis may facilitate the harvest of multiple units within a single donation. METHODS: We compared two PLT apheresis procedures (Amicus and Trima Accel) in a prospective, randomized, paired cross-over study in 60 donors. The 120 donations were compared for depletion of circulating PLT in the donors, PLT yields and PLT recruitment. A recruitment was defined as ratio of total PLT yield and donor PLT depletion > 1. RESULTS: Despite comparable differences of pre- and post-apheresis PLT counts (87 × 10(9)/l in Trima Accel vs. 92 × 10(9)/l in Amicus, p = 0.383), PLT yields were higher with Trima Accel (7.48 × 10(11) vs. 6.06 × 10(11), p < 0.001), corresponding to a higher PLT recruitment (1.90 vs. 1.42, p < 0.001). We observed a different increase of WBC counts after aphereses, which was more pronounced with Trima Accel than with Amicus (1.30 × 10(9)/l vs. 0.46 × 10(9)/l, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both procedures induced PLT recruitment. This was higher in Trima Accel, contributing to a higher yield in spite of a comparable depletion of circulating PLT in the donors. This recruitment facilitates the harvest of multiple units within a single donation and seems to be influenced by the procedure utilized. The different increases of circulating donor white blood cells after donation need further investigation.     

Platelet count is a sensitive predictor of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection yield in previously treated plasma cell disease patients

BACKGROUND: It is often a clinical dilemma to determine when to collect autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) in patients who received prior chemotherapy. It is also challenging to predict if the collected cells will be enough for one or two transplants. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 103 PBPC donors were followed to evaluate factors that predict poor autologous PBPC collection. The donors were categorized into three groups: plasma cell disorders (PCDs), lymphomas, and normal allogeneic donors. RESULTS: Our evaluation showed that platelet (PLT) count before growth factor administration significantly correlated with total CD34+ cell yield (Spearman r = 0.38, p < 0.001). Further analysis showed this correlation was only significant in plasma cell disease patients who received prior chemotherapy (Spearman r = 0.5, p = 0.008). Baseline PLT counts did not correlate with PBPC collection yield in untreated PCD, lymphoma, and normal allogeneic donors. In addition, daily PLT count during PBPC harvest correlated with CD34+ cell yield for that day (Spearman r = 0.41, p < 0.001). With a multiple linear regression model (adjusted R(2) = 0.31, AIC = 63.1), it has been determined that the baseline PLT count significantly correlates with total CD34+ cell yield in treated PCD patients. CONCLUSION: Baseline PLT count is a sensitive indicator of autologous PBPC mobilization in PCD patients who received prior chemotherapy. This finding may be considered before growth factor administration to determine the optimal period to mobilize treated PCD patients and to predict if enough cells can be collected for one or two transplants.     

Transient respiratory disturbance by granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor administration in healthy donors of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation requires granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration to mobilize PBPCs in healthy donors. The effects of G-CSF on pulmonary functions, however, have not been clearly elucidated in PBPC donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Respiratory status by measurements of arterial blood gas was prospectively evaluated serially in 25 healthy donors (9 men, 16 women; age, 18-61 years) administered a dose of 10 microg per kg for 5 days. RESULTS: White blood cell (WBC) counts increased in all the subjects after G-CSF administration; means on Days 0, 3, and 5 were 6 x 10(9), 33.4 x 10(9), and 33.6 x 10(9) per L, respectively. The mean PaO(2) values on the respective days were 93.1, 85.8, and 81.8 mmHg, and these changes were significant (p < 0.0001), remaining significant after adjustment for the WBC count. Levels of both PaCO(2) and AaDO(2) were significantly higher after G-CSF administration than those before G-CSF administration (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0004, respectively). SaO(2) was significantly decreased after G-CSF administration (p = 0.0002). Age was identified as a significant predictive factor for the increase of AaDO(2) and PaO(2) decline. These observations clearly indicate that the gas exchange was significantly affected during G-CSF administration in healthy PBPC donors. CONCLUSION: Considering an increasing use of PBPC mobilization by G-CSF, careful monitoring of the respiratory status is important to ensure safety of PBPC donors, especially elderly donors.     

Comparison of two apheresis systems for the collection of CD14+ cells intended to be used in dendritic cell culture

BACKGROUND: Monocytes collected by leukapheresis are increasingly used for dendritic cell (DC) culture in cell factories suitable for DC vaccination in cancer. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Using modified MNC programs on two apheresis systems (Cobe Spectra and Fresenius AS.TEC204), leukapheresis components collected from 84 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma and from 31 healthy male donors were investigated. MNCs, monocytes, RBCs, and platelets (PLTs) in donors and components were analyzed by cell counters, WBC differential counts, and flow cytometry. RESULTS: In 5-L collections, Astec showed better results regarding monocyte collection rates (11.0 vs. 7.4 x 10(6)/min, p = 0.04) and efficiencies (collection efficiency, 51.9 vs. 31.9%; p < 0.001). Both devices resulted in monocyte yields at an average of 1 x 10(9) (donors) and 2.5 x 10(9) (patients), whereas Astec components contained high residual RBCs. Compared to components with low residual PLTs, high PLT concentration resulted in higher monocyte loss (48 vs. 20%, p < 0.0001) before DC culture. CONCLUSION: The Astec is more efficient in 5-L MNC collections compared to the Spectra. Components with high residual PLTs result in high MNC loss by purification procedures. Thus, optimizing MNC programs is essential to obtain components with high MNC yields and low residual cells as prerequisite for high DC yields.     

Inverse relationship between patient peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and collection efficiency for CD34+ cells in two automated leukapheresis systems

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the CD34 cell collection efficiency (CE) of automated leukapheresis protocols of two blood cell separators (Spectra, COBE [AutoPBSC protocol] and AS104, Fresenius [PBSC-Lym, protocol]) for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvest in patients with malignant diseases. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPCs were collected by the Spectra AutoPBSC protocol in 95 patients (123 collections) and the AS104 PBSC-Lym protocol in 87 patients (115 harvests). Patients underwent a median of one (range, 1-4) conventional-volume apheresis procedure of 10.8 L (9.0-13.9) to obtain a target cell dose of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. RESULTS: The median overall CD34 CE was significantly better on the AS104 than on the Spectra: 55.8 percent versus 42.4 percent (p = 0.000). This was also true below (59.2% vs. 50.1%; p = 0.022) and above (51.2% vs. 41.3%; p = 0.001) the preleukapheresis threshold of 40 CD34+ cells per microL needed to collect a single-apheresis autograft. However, at > or =40 circulating CD34+ cells per microL, both cell separators achieved the target of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. The CD34 CE dropped significantly, from 59.2 percent at <40 cells per microL to 51.2 percent at > or =40 cells per microL on the AS104 (p = 0.017) and from 50.1 percent to 41.3 percent on the Spectra (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Whereas the CD34 CE was significantly different with the AS104 and the Spectra, the CD34 CE of both machines correlated inversely with peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, showing a significant decline with increasing numbers of circulating CD34+ cells. Nevertheless, at > or 40 preapheresis CD34+ cells per microL, sufficient hematopoietic autografts of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg were harvested by a single conventional-volume (11 L) leukapheresis on both cell separators.     

A randomized crossover trial comparing three plateletpheresis machines

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare three different apheresis machines with the same donors regarding the processing time required to obtain a 3.5 x 10(11) platelet (PLT) dose and acceptance by donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized crossover trial was performed to evaluate the differences between the Amicus Crescendo (Baxter Biotech Corp.), the MCS Plus (Haemonetics Corp.), and the Trima Accel (Gambro BCT). Donations from 51 donors were compared for time adjusted to obtain a standard 3.5 x 10(11) PLT dose (TSD3.5), efficiency, adverse reactions, yield, leukodepletion, machine accuracy, and donor preferences. Processing times were measured by chronometer. The same vein access was used during all three processes in each donor. In the statistical analysis, to take into account the nonindependence of several measurements from the same donor, generalized estimating equations were used with an autoregressive correlation matrix. RESULTS: The Accel produced a TSD3.5 (mean +/- SEM) of 47.9 +/- 1.0 min; the Amicus, 60.3 +/- 1.0 min; and the MCS Plus, 66.7 +/- 1.0 (p < 0.0001). The Amicus presented the greatest efficiency (87.5%; p < 0.0028). The MCS Plus demonstrated the highest capacity for leukodepletion (p < 0.0002) despite one process presenting more than 1 x 10(6) white blood cells per unit. The MCS Plus also measured the processing time with the greatest accuracy. No severe adverse effects were observed. The donors preferred the Accel (61%) followed by the Amicus (35%) and the MCS Plus (4%; p < 0.0001) and the processing speed was the most highly valued measure (55%). CONCLUSIONS: The Accel is the fastest and, because of this advantage, the machine preferred by donors. The Amicus was the most efficient and the MCS Plus was the only one not to underestimate the processing time.