Lower erythropoietin and iron supplementation are required in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a common infectious agent in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients. In this prospective case-control study, we aimed to investigate the influence of chronic HCV infection on erythropoietin (EPO) and iron requirement in HD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 49 HD patients (24 male, 25 female, mean age 47 +/- 15 years) were included. The mean time spent on dialysis was 39 +/- 38 months, and follow-up time was 1 year for this study. Biochemical analyses and complete blood counts together with iron status of the patients (transferrin saturation and serum ferritin levels) were measured monthly. Highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were measured within 3-month intervals. Endogenous EPO levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunoassay 2 weeks after cessation of EPO treatment. RESULTS: Eleven of the HD patients (22%) were anti-HCV(+). There was no difference in age, sex, time on dialysis, distribution of primary renal diseases, predialytic BUN, Kt/V, albumin and i-PTH levels between HCV(+) and (-) patients. Anti-HCV-positive patients required significantly lower weekly doses of EPO (87 +/- 25 IU/kg vs 129 +/- 11 IU/kg, p = 0.042) and iron (16.8 +/- 12.2 mg vs 32.6 +/- 16.1 mg, p = 0.02) replacement than anti-HCV(-) group; hs-CRP levels were similar between study groups. Serum endogenous EPO levels were significantly higher in HCV(+) patients than HCV(-) HD patients (9.43 +/- 6.47 mU/ml vs 3.59 +/- 2.08 mU/ml, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Anti-HCV(+) HD patients had higher serum EPO levels and required less EPO and iron replacement as compared to anti-HCV(-) patients. Because of the changes in iron metabolism, iron treatment should be carefully administered in HD patients with HCV.     

The clinical outcome of hepatitis C virus antibody-positive renal allograft recipients.

In order to investigate the prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in renal transplant patients, the evolution of anti-HCV status, and clinical outcome in anti-HCV-positive renal allograft recipients, we tested the sera from 120 renal transplant patients for anti-HCV. Thirty-eight patients were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive. Two patients were anti-delta-positive. A total of 79 patients (65.8%) had at least one serum positive for anti-HCV. Anti-HCV positivity decreased after transplantation for more than 5 years (65.5% at transplantation versus 37.9%, 78.3 +/- 13.4 months later). Among those with positive anti-HCV, the HBsAg-positive group had significantly higher incidence of chronic hepatitis (50% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.026) and liver cirrhosis (21.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.001) than HBsAg-negative group. Among the 82 HBsAg-negative patients, the prevalence of anti-HCV was significantly higher in those with chronic hepatitis than in those without (86.7% vs. 56.7%, P = 0.027). We conclude from this study: (1) anti-HCV positivity is quite prevalent in renal transplant patients; (2) coinfection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) may lead to aggressive liver disease and cirrhosis; HCV infection alone has a more benign clinical outcome; and (3) HCV infection is an important cause of posttransplant chronic hepatitis in HBsAg-negative patients.     

High ALT levels predict viremia in anti-HCV-positive HD patients if a modified normal range of ALT is applied

AIMS: Some studies have reported that ALT determination is of little value in the study of chronic hepatitis C in hemodialysis (HD) patients. This could be due to the fact that ALT values are lower in HD patients than in healthy individuals; ALT in HCV infection follows a fluctuating pattern and the HCV viremia may be intermittent. The aim of this study was to establish the reference ALT values in a large group of hepatitis-free HD patients, and to determine their role in predicting viremia in anti-HCV-positive HD patients. METHODS: Four subject groups were studied: group I, patients with normal renal function (n = 88); group II, hepatitis-free HD patients (n = 218); group III, non-viremic anti-HCV+ HD patients (n = 9); and group IV, viremic anti-HCV+ HD patients (n = 24). The ALT used for calculation purposes was the mean value of the twelve previous months for each individual patient. PCR screening for HCV-RNA was performed at least twice for anti-HCV+ patients; these were deemed viremic (HCV-RNA+) if at least one screening was positive, and non-viremic (HCV-RNA) if all PCR results were negative. RESULTS: Mean ALT in group II was lower than in subjects with normal renal function (15.6 +/- 12 vs. 22.7 +/- 18 IU/l, p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between group III and group II (17.7 +/- 6 vs. 15.6 +/- 6 IU/l, ns). ALT levels in group IV patients were higher than those of groups II and III (38.5 +/- 39 IU/l, p < 0.05). The upper limit (mean + 2 SD and 95th percentile) for ALT in hepatitis-free HD patients was 27 IU/l. Sensitivity of a mean ALT value > or = 27 IU/l in the diagnosis of HCV viremia was 50%, and specificity was 100%. The positive predictive value of this test in the diagnosis of hepatitis C viremia was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: ALT values are lower in HD patients and a high ALT level can constitute an excellent tool in predicting viremia in anti-HCV-positive HD patients once other causes of liver disease have been excluded.     

Infection of hepatitis C virus in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis therapy and staff members]

The prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was determined in 564 patients and 145 staff members of nine hemodialysis (HD) units in Nagano Prefecture using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on the C 100 HCV antigen (the first generation anti-HCV assay). And also serum HBV markers were tested in these subjects. One hundred patients (18%) were anti-C100 HCV positive, indicating that this figure represents a much higher prevalence than that (0.9%) among general population in the same geographical area. Out of 141 patients without history of blood transfusion, 17 (12%) were positive for anti-C 100 HCV, suggesting that blood-transfusions-unrelated acquisition of HCV infection can occur. Anti-HCV prevalence correlated with both the blood units transfused and the duration of HD treatment. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of anti-C 100 HCV in individual dialysis units ranging from 0% to 53%. In the dialysis unit with prevalence of 53%, approximately half of the anti-HCV positive patients were found to have chronic liver disease. The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers among HD patients, on the other hand, was 36% (202/564). Fifty one (51%) of 100 anti-C 100 HCV positive patients and 151 (33%) of 464 anti-C 100 HCV negative patients were positive for HBV markers, with significant difference in HBV infection rate between the 2 groups. The prevalence of chronic liver disease, defined as abnormal serum transaminase levels for more than 6 months was significantly higher in anti-HCV positive patients than in anti-HCV negative ones (39% vs 10%, p less than 0.05), suggesting that HCV infection may contribute to chronic liver disease in HD patients. Among 145 staff members, only 3 (2%) were positive for anti-HCV, whereas 25 (17%) were positive for hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), indicating prior HBV infection. With applying the second generation anti-HCV assay, which can detect antibodies to both capsid and nonstructural products of HCV gene, anti-HCV prevalence increased by two times in HD patients, but didn't change in HD staff members.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as an adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccination in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) have poor seroconversion rate after hepatitis B vaccination. The present study was designed to test the efficacy of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as an adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccination for improving seroconversion rate in maintenance HD patients. Twelve chronic HD patients were randomly assigned to receive either hepatitis B vaccination alone or hepatitis B vaccination 24 h after 1 dose of GM-CSF for primary immunization. A group of 16 chronic HD patients who had not seroconverted after a standard two-dose hepatitis B vaccination were randomly assigned either to a booster dose of hepatitis B vaccine alone or a booster dose given 24 h after one dose of GM-CSF. In the primary immunization group only 2 of 6 patients (33%) who had received vaccination alone, versus 5 of 6 patients (83%) who had received hepatitis B vaccine after one dose of GM-CSF, developed seroprotective antibody titers. Moreover, seroprotective antibody titers (IU/ml) were significantly higher in the latter group (275 +/- 286.5 vs. 14 +/- 22, p < 0.05). In patients who had not seroconverted with prior hepatitis B vaccination, GM-CSF adjuvant therapy significantly increased the seroconversion rate versus booster dose alone (87.5 vs. 25%, respectively, p < 0.02), with significantly higher seroprotective antibody titers (84 +/- 80 vs. 19 +/- 33 IU/ml, respectively, p < 0. 05). These findings suggest that administration of one dose of GM-CSF, as adjuvant therapy, prior to primary or booster dose hepatitis B vaccination may significantly increase seroconversion rate and seroprotective antibody titers in chronic HD patients.     

维持性血液透析患者感染乙型和丙型肝炎的分析

目的为了评价血液透析（血透）患者乙型和丙型肝炎（HBV、HCV）感染状态及对临床情况和肝功能的影响。方法对62例血透患者应用ELISA法和RT-PCR法检测抗-HCV和HCVRNA，采用斑点杂交法和固相放免法检测HBV标志，并检测肝功能和血浆蛋白电泳。结果62例患者中，抗-HCVIgM阳性27例（43．6％），抗-HCVIgG阳性29例（46．8％），HCVRNA阳性34例（54．8％），三项任一项阳性37例（59．7％），5例（8．1％）HBsAg阳性，其中HBeAg和HBVDNA阳性3例。结论向透患者中HCV感染严重，临床情况及预后差，检测血浆蛋白和电泳较肝功能酶学能更好地作为肝炎诊断和反映病情的指标。     

Measurement of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels in hemodialysis patients positive for anti-hepatitis virus C antibody

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of anti-hepatitis virus C (HCV) antibody is much higher in hemodialysis (HD) patients than in the normal population. Recently, blood des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (PIVKA-II) has been demonstrated as a sensitive marker for the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we measured blood PIVKA-II in HD patients positive for anti-HCV antibody or hepatitis B virus surface (HBs) antigen to examine if HD therapy may affect the measurement of PIVKA-II. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-four stable HD patients who had anti-HCV antibodies (n = 86) or HBs antigen (n = 8) without any evidence of HCC were enrolled in the study (age: 60 +/- 11 years, duration of HD: 17 +/- 10 years, male/female = 63/31). Five patients had liver cirrhosis and another 5 patients received warfarin treatment. We simultaneously measured serum PIVKA-II and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and compared the association between these markers and HCV RNA titer and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Serum PIVKA-II became positive (> or = 40 mAU/ml) in only 5.6% (5/89) of patients without warfarin administration, ranging from 47 to 71 mAU/ml. Seventy out of 89 patients (78.7%) were below 20 mAU/ml. Serum PIVKA-II did not correlate with biochemical parameters including HCV RNA, while serum AFP was significantly correlated with serum AST (r = 0.21, p < 0.05), gamma-GTP (r = 0.21, p < 0.01) and platelet counts (r = -0.29, p < 0.01), respectively. In contrast, 5 patients receiving warfarin had an extremely high PIVKA-II value ranging from 1,930 to 19,900 mAU/ml. PIVKA-II was significantly and inversely correlated with the thrombotest value (r = -0.72, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The positivity of blood PIVKA-II in HD patients with hepatitis viremia was identical to that in patients without renal failure. Warfarin treatment dramatically increased serum PIVKA-II more than 1,000 mAU/ml. These findings suggested that HD treatment itself did not affect the measurement of PIVKA-II, but vitamin K deficiency can readily influence the PIVKA-II level in dialysis patients.     

Oxidative stress markers in hepatitis C infected hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress in hemodialysis (HD) patients or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections may be related to increased production of free radicals. We assessed the effect of HCV infection on the oxidative stress markers, malondialdehyde (as TBARS), protein carbonyl content and protein sulfhydryl groups, in chronic HD patients. METHODS: Twenty HCV infected patients (9 men and 11 women, age 44.8 +/- 14.3 years) and 10 non-HCV infected patients (6 men and 4 women, age 55.6 +/- 14.3 years) receiving regular HD were recruited. The average hemodialysis duration was 30 +/- 8 months for HCV (+) patients and 14 +/- 8 months for HCV (-) patients. Controls consisted of healthy subjects. RESULTS: Serum TBARS and carbonyl content were significantly elevated in HCV(-) patients (p<0.001, p<0.05) and in HCV(+) patients (p<0.001, p<0.001) vs. Controls. There was also a significant difference in serum TBARS and carbonyl content between HCV(-) patients and HCV(+) patients (p<0.001, p<0.05). Serum protein sulfhydryl groups in HCV(-) and HCV(+) patients were the same, but significantly lower than in Controls (p<0.001, p<0.001). When HCV(+) patients were divided into two sub-groups, one with shorter (13.4 +/- 8 months; n=7) and the other with longer (40.3 +/- 8 months; n=13) duration of HD treatment, no differences were found between subgroups. CONCLUSION: HCV infection may aggravate oxidative stress in HD patients.     

Plasma concentration of human atrial natriuretic polypeptide in patients with impaired renal function

Using direct radioimmunoassay, the plasma concentration of human atrial natriuretic polypeptide (hANP) was measured in patients with impaired renal function. Patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and those still on medical management (non-HD) were examined. In 13 non-HD patients with serum creatinine values from 2.0 to 8.3 mg/dl, mean plasma hANP (+/- SE) was 404 +/- 23 pg/ml, while it was 236 +/- 11 pg/ml in the normal control group (n = 15) and the difference was significant (p less than 0.001). In all patients as a whole, there was a positive correlation between plasma hANP and mean blood pressure (r = 0.56, p less than 0.05) but no correlation was present between plasma hANP and renal function. Fifty-six HD patients were divided into 2 groups depending on blood pressure level. Plasma levels of hANP in the hypertensive (BP greater than or equal to 150/90 mmHg, n = 21) and in the normotensive (BP less than 150/90 mmHg, n = 35) HD group were 588 +/- 58 pg/ml and 364 +/- 29 pg/ml, respectively, with plasma hANP in both HD groups significantly higher than in the controls (p less than 0.001). There was also a significant difference of plasma hANP between hypertensive and normotensive HD patients (p less than 0.01). However, when the normotensive HD group without cardiomegaly (cardiothoracic ratio less than 50%, n = 17) was compared with the control, the value of plasma hANP was not statistically different from that of the control group. These results suggest that plasma hANP in patients with impaired renal function is influenced by blood pressure and/or cardiac condition.     

Severe evolution of chronic hepatitis C in renal transplantation: a case control study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of kidney transplantation on histopathological progression of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 28 HCV-positive renal transplant patients, who underwent two sequential liver biopsies with a mean of 7.1+/-4.0 years, were compared with 28 matched immunocompetent controls. RESULTS: According to the Metavir score, the initial and final activity scores (from 0 to 3) increased from 0.2+/-0.4 to 1.4+/-1.1 (P<0.001) and those of fibrosis (from 0 to 4) from 0.5+/-0.5 to 2.0+/-1.4 (P<0.001) in the transplanted group, respectively, whereas the respective differences were not significant in the control group. The yearly progression rate of activity and fibrosis was significantly higher in the renal transplant group as compared with the immunocompetent group: 0.26+/-0.41 vs 0.01+/-0.19 (P<0.01) and 0.26+/-0.35 vs 0.05+/-0.21 (P<0.03), respectively. Twenty (71.5%) and 14 (50.0%) of the renal allograft recipients had activity and fibrosis progression as compared with four (16%) (P<0.001) and four (16%) (P<0.01) in immunocompetent patients; six kidney recipients (21.4%) evolved to cirrhosis vs only one in the control group (3.6%) (P=0.07). Liver-related mortality was significantly higher during the follow-up period in renal transplant patients than in the control group (10 vs 0%) (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Using conventional immunosuppressive regimen, renal transplantation is associated with a more severe evolution of chronic hepatitis C as compared with HCV-infected immunocompetent subjects. Thus, the histopathological evaluation should be performed and anti-viral therapy discussed before renal transplantation.     

Does hepatitis C virus infection increase hematocrit and hemoglobin levels in hemodialyzed patients?

OBJECTIVE: Some case reports indicated that red cell status increased after hepatitis C viral infection. The aim of study was to define the influence of hepatitis C infection (HCV) on red cell status in hemodialyzed patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 49 (21 anti-HCV-positive and 28 anti-HCV-negative) patients with ESRD were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were blood transfusion and massive blood loss in the last 6 months preceding the study. None of the patients used any drug containing aluminum. RESULTS: The prevalence of anti-HCV antibody was 42.8%. Mean age was 51.6 +/- 14.3 in anti-HCV (+) group and 50.4 +/- 17.0 in anti-HCV (-) group. There was no statistically significant difference between the ages of the 2 groups. Mean duration time of hemodialysis was significantly longer in patients with anti-HCV antibody (+) group (54.9 +/- 34.2 months) compared to anti-HCV-negative group (12.5 +/- 9.0 months) (p < 0.001). Mean hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Htc) levels were significantly higher in anti-HCV-positive patients than in anti-HCV-negative patients (Hb: 10.4 +/- 1.8 g/dl, Htc: 30.5 +/- 5.5% vs Hb: 8.8 +/- 1.7 g/dl, Htc: 26.1 +/- 5.3%) (for Hb p < 0.005, for Htc p < 0.007). There was no significant difference regarding the usage ofrHuEPO between the 2 study groups (57.1% in anti-HCV antibody (+)/59.3% in anti-HCV antibody (-)) (p > 0.05). All patients not receiving rHuEPO did so because of economical reasons. Serum AST and ALT levels were significantly higher in the anti-HCV antibody-positive group compared with the anti-HCV antibody-negative group. (AST p < 0.04, ALT p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: Anti-HCV antibody-positive ESRD patients have higher hemoglobin and hematocrit levels compared to HCV-negative patients.     

Antibodies against hepatitis C virus among renal transplant patients in Greece

To evaluate the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Greek renal transplant (RT) patients and its association with abnormal liver function tests (LFTs), serum anti-HCV was determined (Ortho-ELISA test system) in 206 RT and 245 haemodialysis patients (HD) as controls. The prevalence (10.2%) of anti-HCV in RT patients was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than in the Greek general population (0.7%) and lower (P < 0.0001) than in the HD patients (23.8%), and was not related to the patients' age, post-transplant time or pre-transplant HD time. None of the anti-HCV RT patients was HBsAg +, whereas 13 (62%) and 12 (57%) of them were anti-HBsAg + and anti-HBc +, respectively. The incidence of abnormal LFTs in anti-HCV + HBsAg ? and anti-HCV ? HBsAg + RT patients was similar. Our findings indicate that: (a) the prevalence of serum anti-HCV in the Greek RT population is high, although considerably lower than in HD pts; (b) anti-HCV + RT patients have a high incidence of abnormal LFTs, comparable to that seen in HBsAg + RT patients; and (c) in a substantial proportion of anti-HCV + RT patients there is evidence of previous HBV infection.     

Natural history of hepatitis C virus infection in adult renal graft recipients

AIM: To study the natural history of hepatitis C virus infection in renal transplantation, 464 HbsAg negative patients were prospectively studied from 1989. METHODS: AntiHCV was tested by ELISA II and HCVRNA by Amplicor HCV RNA tests. RESULTS: Two hundred nine patients were antiHCV positive (C+). HCVRNA was confirmed in 89% of C+ patients. Compared with the 255 anti-HCV negative (C-), C+ had undergone longer periods of dialysis (P = .0001), were more transfused (P = .01), and included more retransplants (P = .002). Immunosuppression was azathioprine (AZA) plus steroids in 133 and cyclosporine (CsA) in 331 patients. Liver biopsy showed chronic active hepatitis in 50, cirrhosis in 8, and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in 2 patients. Histologic progression of liver disease was confirmed in 18 of 26 patients. The causes of death in 84 patients (51 C+ vs 33 C-) were cardiovascular disease in 49%, sepsis in 13%, liver failure in 14%, neoplasia in 21%, and hepatocarcinoma in 2%. The 14-year patient survival was 75% in C+ and 86% in C- (P = .002). By multivariate analysis, age (>40) (P = .001) and C+ (P = .019) correlated with a worse patient survival. If patients were stratified according to age (<40 vs > or =40), younger C+ patients had a lower survival probability (P = .03). The 14-year graft survival was 44% in C+ vs 60% in C- patients (P = .001) but pure graft survival was similar (68% in C+ vs 72% in C-) (P = .13). CONCLUSION: The presence of C+ significantly reduced both patient and graft survival in the long-term with liver failure being the second most frequent cause of death.     

Chronic liver disease in kidney recipients with hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive test is higher among patients in dialysis and in kidney recipients than in general population. Hepatitis C virus infection is the main cause of chronic liver disease in renal transplant patients. Liver biopsy and virological analysis were performed to clarify the grade of liver damage in kidney recipients. METHODS: Renal recipients patients with at least 5 yr under immunosuppression were submitted to clinical and laboratory analysis. Patients who tested anti-HCV positive were candidates to liver biopsy with no regard to transaminase levels. RESULTS: Forty-five patients tested anti-HCV positive and 42 anti-HCV negative. Twenty-six anti-HCV and RNA-HCV positive patients were submitted to liver biopsy. Seventy-three percentage of these patients presented chronic active hepatitis, from these only one patient presented cirrhosis. Only 29% of the anti-HCV positive group presented elevated alanine aminotransferase levels. Anti-HCV positive patients presented longer previous time on dialysis and less rejection episodes than the group anti-HCV negative (p < 0.05). All anti-HCV positive patients but one tested RNA-HCV positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). CONCLUSIONS: In this series the prevalence of anti-HCV positive is 51.7%. Most of the patients presented liver damage in histology caused by HCV. However, we found only mild or minimal fibrosis and inflammatory activity grade, despite 10 yr of HCV infection and 5 yr of immunosuppressive treatment. Only one patient presented cirrhosis (4%). Performing serial liver biopsies in a long-term follow-up is needed to clarify the impact of HCV infection in renal transplant patients.     

Cerebral ischemia as a causative mechanism for rapid progression of brain atrophy in chronic hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND: It has been found that brain atrophy develops more rapidly in patients with end-stage renal failure after initiation of dialysis therapy. The present study was designed to analyze the relationship between brain atrophy and asymptomatic ischemic brain lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed for the evaluation of brain atrophy and ischemic lesions. Brain atrophy was assessed by the ventricular-brain ratio (VBR), calculated as the ratio of the ventricular area to the whole brain area on the maximum MRI slice. The severity of periventricular hyperintensity (PVH) and the number of lacunae were also regarded as ischemic brain lesions. Fifty-five patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD) without clinically overt neurological signs and symptoms, with a mean age of 52 +/- 11 (SD) years and a mean HD duration of 7 +/- 6 (SD) years were subjected. VBR and its relationship to ischemic brain lesion data were compared to those in 35 non-HD patients (controls), with a mean age of 42 +/- 14 (SD) years. RESULTS: The VBR, the number of lacunae and the severity of PVH tended to increase with age in HD. The VBRs at all age groups were significantly higher in HD than in controls (7.0 vs 3.7% at the 4th decade, p < 0.05; 8.4 vs 5. 9% at the 5th decade, p < 0.05; 9.6 vs 5.4% at the 6th decade, p < 0.05; and 11.6 vs 6.3% at the 7th decade, p < 0.05). HD patients had significantly higher number of lacunae and had more advanced PVH than did controls. Both the number of lacunae and the severity of PVH were significantly correlated to VBR in HD. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the rapid progression of brain atrophy was related to the asymptomatic ischemic brain lesions in our HD patients. Such data indicated that cerebral ischemia might be a causative mechanism of brain atrophy in chronic hemodialysis patients.     

Efficacy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for patients on hemodialysis. Comparison with those not on dialysis

Ischemic heart disease has become more important in regard to mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We examined the therapeutic outcome of initial percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) in maintenance HD patients with angina pectoris. They consisted of 8 men and 4 women with a mean age of 56.3 +/- 8.6 years and a mean duration of HD of 4.3 +/- 4.0 years. Thirty-six non-HD patients treated with initial PTCA were matched for age, sex and coronary risk factors, and used as a control. Angiographic lesion success was confirmed by angiography in 21 (84%) of the 25 stenotic sites attempted and clinical success was obtained in 9 (75%) of the 12 HD patients, while there were 40 (78%) lesions successfully removed out of the 51 stenotic sites and there were 26 (72%) clinically successful cases out of the 36 non-HD patients, respectively. Angina recurred in 4 (44%) of 9 HD patients, and in 10 (38%) of 26 non-HD patients after successful PTCA, where the follow-up periods were 23 +/- 20 and 28 +/- 25 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in cumulative lesion survival curve between the two groups. In conclusion, PTCA for chronic HD patients is as effective as that for non-HD patients, at least regarding initial PTCA.     

Outcome of 67 patients with hepatocellular cancer detected during screening of 1125 patients with chronic hepatitis.

OBJECTIVE: We performed this prospective screening trial in chronic hepatitis virus-infected patients to determine the incidence of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and the resectability and long-term survival rates of these HCC patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic hepatitis B or C virus infection is a major etiologic factor in human HCC. It is not clear if routine screening of chronic viral hepatitis patients improves the survival of patients who develop HCC. METHODS: Screening for HCC was offered to patients chronically seropositive (>5 years) for hepatitis B or C infection. All patients underwent percutaneous core liver biopsy to assess the histologic severity of chronic liver injury. Patients were screened initially and every 3 months thereafter with serum alpha-fetoprotein and transabdominal ultrasound evaluations; HCC was confirmed by needle biopsy of liver tumors. RESULTS: Screening was performed on 1125 hepatitis-positive patients (804 with hepatitis C, 290 with hepatitis B, 31 with both). On liver biopsy, 800 patients had mild chronic active hepatitis and 325 had severe chronic active hepatitis, cirrhosis, or both. Initial screening detected HCC in 61 patients. HCC was detected in six more patients during follow-up; thus, the incidence of HCC was 5.9% (67/1125). However, 66 of the 67 HCC cases (98.5%) arose in the 325 patients with severe chronic active hepatitis or cirrhosis (66/325 [20.3%] vs. 1/800 [0.1%], p < 0.0001 [Wilcoxon signed rank]). Median follow-up of the 67 HCC patients was 24 months. Locally advanced or metastatic, unresectable HCC occurred in 43 patients (64.2%); 24 patients (35.8%), including the 6 patients detected during follow-up screening, underwent margin-negative resection. The median survival for the 24 resected patients was 26 months, compared to 6 months for the 43 patients with unresectable cancer (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed rank). CONCLUSIONS: HCC was found to arise in 20.3% of patients with chronic hepatitis B or C infection and severe liver injury. Initial screening detected resectable lesions in less than half the HCC patients. Routine screening of chronic hepatitis B or C virus-infected patients with ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein determination should be reserved for patients with severe chronic active hepatitis, cirrhosis, or both.     

Extrahepatic immunological manifestations of hepatitis C virus in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may be associated with various extrahepatic immunological disorders. Uremic patients on chronic regular dialytic treatment (RDT) frequently develop immunological abnormalities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the probability that HCV infection creates an increased risk for extrahepatic immunological abnormalities in chronic RDT patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a series of one hundred sixteen chronic RDT patients, HCV status was determined by anti-HCV antibodies, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) RNA and viral genotyping. After excluding four anti-HCV negative/PCRRNA positive patients, a comparison was made between 51 anti-HCV negative/PCR-RNA negative and 61 anti-HCV positive patients, this latter group including seventeen PCR-RNA negative, fifteen genotype 1, thirteen genotype 2, three genotype 3, four genotype 4, four undeterminable genotype and five mixed genotypes. The following investigations were performed: cryoglobulinemia (presence, titer and, when possible, identification), monoclonal gammopathy, antineutrophil cytoplasm antibodies, antidouble stranded DNA antibodies, circulating immunocomplexes and immunoglobulin levels. RESULTS: Cryoglobulinemia was found in 77% of anti-HCV positive versus 29% of anti-HCV negative patients, and cryocrit > 1% in 50% versus 9.8% respectively, p=<0.01. Also cryoglobulin concentration was higher (logarithmic transformation: 4.38 +/- 0.94 vs 3.11 +/- 1.06, p =< 0.001) in anti-HCV positive versus negative patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significantly increased odds ratio (12.0, confidence interval 3.0 to 48.3) for having high levels of cryoglobulins (cryocrit >1%) after adjusting for age and dialytic age. The prevalence of this abnormality did not differ significantly among patients infected with different genotypes, but a tendency towards a lower frequency was observed in the anti-HCV positive/PCR negative subgroup. Cryoglobulins were identified as type I (2 anti-HCV positive case), type II (2 anti-HCV positive and 1 anti-HCV negative case) and type 3 (1 anti-HCV negative case). The frequency of monoclonal gammopathy was not significantly different between anti-HCV positive and anti-HCV negative patients (6.5% versus 2%) as well as that of the other parameters evaluated except for IgG concentration which was higher in the anti-HCV positive group (1,685 +/-605 versus 1349 +/- 352 mg/dl, p 0.006). Five events, potentially linked to HCV infection, occurred in our anti-HCV positive patients: 2 cases of porphyria cutanea, 1 case of unexplained peripheral neuropathy, 1 cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis, 1 death for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In one anti-HCV positive patient treated with interferon-alpha, the presence of cryoglobulins, monoclonal gammopathy and high IgG levels strictly paralleled that of viremia, disappearing during the recovery phase under treatment and reappearing shortly after stopping treatment. CONCLUSIONS: HCV infection provides a significantly increased risk for developing extrahepatic immunological abnormalities also in chronic RDT patients. It is possible that the clinical relevance of this event might be scant because of the low level of these abnormalities, but an awareness of its possibility should to be taken into account.     

Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in the hemodialysis unit.

An enzyme immunoassay was used to detect antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in 261 patients and 69 staff members of a hemodialysis unit. The prevalence of anti-HCV was 46.7% in patients and 2.9% in staff members (p less than 0.001). The prevalence of anti-HCV increased significantly with increasing duration of hemodialysis (p less than 0.001), but was not related to age, sex, history of blood transfusion, status of hepatitis B or hepatitis A virus infection, or serum ALT. Patients with hepatitis episode increased with increasing duration of hemodialysis and showed a significantly higher prevalence of anti-HCV than those without (63.1 vs. 34.7%, p less than 0.001). The prevalence of anti-HCV in patients with hepatitis also increased with increasing duration of hemodialysis (p = 0.05). Thus, HCV appears to be the major cause of hepatitis in hemodialysis patients. Besides strict infection control measures, further studies are needed to determine the mode of HCV infection and its prevention in the hemodialysis unit.