“Non-criteria” antiphospholipid syndrome: A nomenclature proposal

The classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) generate discussion, with a growing impression that certain patients not fulfilling these criteria might be inadequately excluded from the classification. Nonetheless, these “non-criteria” patients are heterogeneously defined across different publications. We reviewed the “non-criteria” APS subgroups depicted in the literature and attempted to organize these subsets in a nomenclature proposal that could be used for research purposes.We established four potential patient profiles, grouped under the broad term “non-criteria APS”: (A) “Seronegative APS”: patients fulfilling clinical criteria, plus “non-criteria” manifestations, with persistently negative antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL); (B) “Clinical non-criteria APS”: patients with “non-criteria” manifestations, plus aPL positivity fulfilling the classification criteria; (C) “Incomplete laboratory APS”: patients fulfilling clinical criteria, plus positive aPL, but not fulfilling the classification criteria (low titer aPL); and (D) “Laboratory non-criteria APS”: patients fulfilling clinical criteria, with negative or low titer criteria aPL, plus positive “non-criteria” aPL. This categorization could allow for a more homogeneous research approach to APS, enabling more sustained and universal conclusions.     

Antiphospholipid antibodies

The concept of antiphospholipid syndrome(APS) has been widely accepted. Antiphospholipid antibodies originally included anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulants as serological marker of APS. However, recent advances have shown that most pathogenic antiphospholipid antibodies are directed to phospholipid binding proteins such as beta 2-glycoprotein I and prothrombin as well as phospholipids. The preliminary classification criteria for definite APS have been advocated as the "Sapporo criteria". Further prospective investigations are required to re-evaluate the clinical significance of so-called antiphospholipid antibodies.     

Evaluation of novel assays for the detection of autoantibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome

Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) present with clinical features of recurrent thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity and persistently test positive for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). At least one clinical (vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity) and one lab-based (positive test result for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies) criterion have to be met for a patient to be classified as having APS. Nevertheless, the clinical variety of APS encompasses additional signs and symptoms, potentially affecting any organ, that cannot be explained exclusively by a prothrombotic state. Those manifestations, also known as extra-criteria manifestations, include haematologic (thrombocytopenia and haemolytic anaemia), neurologic (chorea, myelitis and migraine) manifestations as well as the presence of livedo reticularis, nephropathy and valvular heart disease. The growing body of evidence describing the clinical aspect of the syndrome has been paralleled over the years by emerging research interest focusing on the development of novel biomarkers that might improve the diagnostic accuracy for APS when compared to the current aPL tests. This review will focus on the clinical utility of extra-criteria aPL specificities. Besides, the promising role of a new technology using particle based multi-analyte testing that supports aPL panel algorithm testing will be discussed. Diagnostic approaches to difficult cases, including real-world case studies investigating the diagnostic added value of extra criteria aPL, particularly anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, will also be examined.     

14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force Report on Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Pregnancy morbidity is one of the clinical manifestations used for classification criteria of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). During the 14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies (aPL), a Task Force with internationally-known experts was created to carry out a critical appraisal of the literature available regarding the association of aPL with obstetric manifestations present in actual classification criteria (recurrent early miscarriage, fetal death, preeclampsia and placental insufficiency) and the quality of the evidence that treatment(s) provide benefit in terms of avoiding recurrent adverse obstetric outcomes. The association of infertility with aPL and the effectiveness of the treatment of patients with infertility and positive aPL was also investigated. This report presents current knowledge and limitations of published studies regarding pregnancy morbidity, infertility and aPL, identifying areas that need better investigative efforts and proposing how critical flaws could be avoided in future studies, as suggested by participants of the Task Force. Except for fetal death, there are limitations in the quality of the data supporting the association of aPL with obstetric complications included in the current APS classification criteria. Recommended treatments for all pregnancy morbidity associated to APS also lack well-designed studies to confirm its efficacy. APL does not seem to be associated with infertility and treatment does not improve the outcomes in infertile patients with aPL. In another section of the Task Force, Dr. Jane Salmon reviewed complement-mediated inflammation in reproductive failure in APS, considering new therapeutic targets to obstetric APS (Ob APS).     

Antiphospholipid syndrome diagnosis: an update

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by arterial and/or venous thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity in association with the persistent presence of autoantibodies called antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs). APAs are a heterogeneous group of circulating autoantibodies that can be detected either by phospholipid-dependent coagulation test for lupus anticoagulant (LA) or ELISA test for anticardiolipin and anti-β2GPI antibodies. In 2006, the revised criteria for the diagnosis of APS introduce the anti-β2GPI antibodies as a new biological criterion and highlight the necessity to increase the interval between two positive APA test from 6 to 12 weeks. However, despite these updated criteria, the diagnosis of APS remains challenging and we proposed here to make an overview of the latest evolution in the diagnosis of this syndrome.     

Antiprothombin antibodies and the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome

The preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) include the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and/or lupus anticoagulant (LA) as laboratory criteria. However, antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are a heterogeneous group of antibodies comprising also antibodies against phospholipid-binding proteins or their complexes with phospholipids. Prothrombin is one of the antigen recognized by aPL. In the last decade, there has been increasing interest in antibodies against prothrombin alone and those against phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex. The latter, phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies (aPT), have been closely associated with APS and LA. In this paper, we review the properties of antiprothrombin antibodies.     

The clinical value of assays detecting antibodies against domain I of β2-glycoprotein I in the antiphospholipid syndrome

As the clinical symptoms of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) frequently occur irrespective of the syndrome, diagnosis predominantly depends on the laboratory assays measuring the level or function of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) is increasingly accepted as the most important target of aPLs. Anti-β2GPI antibodies constitute a heterogeneous population, but current in vivo and in vitro evidence show that especially the first domain (DI) of β2GPI contains an important pathogenic epitope. This epitope containing Glycine40-Arginine43 (G40-R43) has proven to be cryptic and only exposed when β2GPI is in its open conformation. A previous study demonstrated a highly variable exposure of the cryptic epitope in commercial anti-β2GPI assays, with implications on correct patient classification. Unexpectedly, recent unpublished data revealed impaired exposure of the pathogenic epitope in the commercially available anti-DI chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA) assay detecting specific antibodies directed to DI.In this review we summarize the laboratory and clinical performance characteristics of the different anti-DI assays in published data and conclude with inconsistent results for both the correlation of anti-DI antibodies with clinical symptoms and the added value of anti-DI antibodies in the classification criteria of APS. Additionally, we hypothesize on possible explanations for the observed discrepancies. Finally, we highly advise manufacturers to use normal pooled plasma spiked with the monoclonal anti-DI antibodies to verify correct exposure of the cryptic epitope.     

Classification of primary antiphospholipid syndrome as systemic lupus erythematosus: Analysis of a cohort of 214 patients

Objectives

To assess the limitations of the SLICC (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS).

Anticardiolipin antibodies and recurrent early pregnancy loss: a century of equivocal evidence

In 1987, Nigel Harris cautioned against over-diagnosing the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In what was a rather prophetic editorial titled 'The Syndrome of the Black Swan', he suggested that while patients with APS do indeed exist, they are probably much more unusual than many medical professionals might like to believe. He expressed concern that the value of studying antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) as interesting non-organ specific autoantibodies, would become lost in a 'sea of over-interpreted and over-reported laboratory and clinical findings'. It is our contention that 25 years later, this prediction has come to pass, particularly with respect to one type of aPL and its relation to a clinical event, namely anticardiolipin antibodies and early recurrent pregnancy loss. In this commentary, we trace the evolution of the current dogma and propose that reevaluation of available data from an alternative perspective results in quite a different understanding, the acceptance of which would necessitate not only a revision of the classification criteria for APS but also the subsequent revision of many diagnoses.     

Diagnosis and classification of the antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by the occurrence of venous and arterial thromboses, often multiple, and recurrent fetal losses, frequently accompanied by a moderate thrombocytopenia, in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Some estimates indicate that the incidence of the APS is around 5 new cases per 100,000 persons per year and the prevalence around 40–50 cases per 100,000 persons. The aPL are positive in approximately 13% of patients with stroke, 11% with myocardial infarction, 9.5% of patients with deep vein thrombosis and 6% of patients with pregnancy morbidity. The original classification criteria for the APS were formulated at a workshop in Sapporo, Japan, in 1998, during the 8th International Congress on aPL. The Sapporo criteria, as they are often called, were revised at another workshop in Sydney, Australia, in 2004, during the 11th International Congress on aPL. At least one clinical (vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity) and one laboratory (anticardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant or anti-β₂-glycoprotein I antibodies) criterion had to be met for the classification of APS.     

HLA class II alleles and genetic predisposition to the antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Its etiology is linked to genetic predisposition, which is accounted for, at least in part, by genes of major histocompatibility complex (HLA system). The association of APS with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles is a consequence of the association of aPL with HLA alleles. Some HLA alleles carry the risk to produce aPL, and this is independent of the clinical context. In fact, we find the same associations between HLA and aPL in primary APS and in APS secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The association of HLA-DR4, -DR7, -DRw53 and -DQB1*0302 with aCL that has been demonstrated in primary APS can also be found in SLE, a disease with a completely different pattern of HLA allele association (DR2, DR3, DRw52). In addition, the various aPL (anticardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, anti-beta2GPI antibodies, antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies) show similar HLA association, again independent of the clinical context (primary APS or SLE), and across various ethnic groups.     

Antiphospholipid antibodies, antiphospholipid syndrome and infections

Since the association between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and syphilis was first described, many other viral, bacterial and parasitic infections have been shown to induce antiphospholipid antibodies, notably anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL). A review of the literature shows that while aCL occur frequently in viral infections, particularly in HIV (49.75%), HBV (24%) and HCV (20%), it is very rarely associated with anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-beta2GPI) and is not correlated with thrombosis risk or hematological manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Concerning bacterial infections, aCL is often present in leprosy (42.7%), where it is frequently associated with the presence of anti-beta2GPI (44.8%), and in syphilis infections (8 to 67%), though without correlation with thrombotic events. Though few individual patients with unequivocal infection-induced aPL satisfy criteria for APS, the lack of statistical association with thrombotic events strongly argues against the identification of a true APS subset in this context. However, physicians should keep in mind the fact that an infection, generally bacterial, in patients with confirmed APS, may lead to catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome with a possible fatal outcome.     

Laboratory evaluation of the antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was first described in 1986. The original association of this hypercoagulable state with anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) resulted from the synthesis of evidence stemming from laboratory findings in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), ie, the frequent occurrence of false-positive VDRL tests and the paradoxical observation of the so-called "lupus anticoagulant" (LA), an increase in phospholipid (PL)-dependent clotting times. By the early 1990s, it was clear that a co-factor was involved in the reaction of antibodies to PL (aPL) in SLE patients with secondary APS and that this was a hitherto-obscure protein, beta-2 glycoprotein I (beta2GPI). In the intervening years, it has been established that beta2GPI and other PL-binding proteins such as prothrombin (PT) are relevant antigens in APS and assays for these antigens have been developed, standardized, and applied to subjects with both primary and secondary APS. Measurement and confirmation of LA activity is based on a stepwise approach and should follow the recommendations of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Although antibodies to various PL-binding proteins have been suggested as diagnostic targets for APS, the current (2006) consensus guidelines recognize only LA, aCL, and anti-beta2GPI for the classification of APS.     

The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome: A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma

The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is the association of certain clinical features with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) in the serum or plasma of affected individuals. APS may be primary or secondary to another disease, typically autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).The prototypic clinical features are thrombotic events (venous and arterial) and pregnancy morbidity (recurrent fetal loss, severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, and multiple spontaneous abortions). The term antiphospholipid antibody is a misnomer since it now appears that APA are actually directed against protein phospholipid complexes. APA may also occur secondary to infections however these APA seem to be directed at phopsholipid only and are transient. Particular phospholipid-binding proteins associated with APS include beta 2-glycoprotein I (B2GPI), prothrombin, and annexin V. A recent International Consensus Statement defines Definite APS as the presence of certain clinical findings (either a thrombotic event and/or pregnancy morbidity) and the presence and persistence of laboratory evidence of APA [either the lupus anticoagulant (LA) and/or anticardiolipin antibodies (ACL)]. Other clinical features associated with APS include thrombocytopenia, various skin conditions, cardiac valvular diseases, and diverse neurological conditions as outlined in the main text. These other features may be part of APS but require further evidence to establish their pathological and clinical validity. Other laboratory tests of interest include anti-B2GPI, antiprothrombin, and antiphosphatidylserine antibodies. The diagnostic and clinical importance of these additional laboratory tests remains to be determined.APA are estimated to be present in up to 5% of the general population, with the prevalence increasing with age. APA are estimated to be present in 12% or more of patients with thrombosis. ACL are present in 12 to 30% of patients with SLE and LA are present in 15 to 34% of patients with SLE. There is often concordance between LA and ACL however this is not always true. APA (both ACL and LA) are associated with thromboembolic events. Venous thrombosis is more common than arterial thrombosis and a minority of patients have both. LA is more strongly associated with thrombosis than ACL. The estimated yearly incidence of thrombosis in individuals with APA is 1% for those with no history of thrombosis, 4% for those with SLE, and 6% for those with high titer immunoglobulin G (IgG) ACL. The presence of LA, and possibly of medium to high titers of IgG ACL, help identify patients at risk for thrombosis.     

The emerging role of multiple antiphospholipid antibodies positivity in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by clinical symptoms of vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in the presence of autoimmune antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Current laboratory APS criteria include the presence of at least one of the three relevant aPL: lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β₂ glycoprotein I antibodies. Therefore, patients could have a single aPL pattern or combinations of aPL. Evidence arising from clinical experience indicates that patients having the highest aPL titer and simultaneous aPL detected by different tests have a worse prognosis and a higher probability of recurrence of the APS clinical features. In recent years, an emerging role of multiple aPL positivity in the identification of high-risk patients with aPL/APS is evident. This paper will review the current knowledge on the clinical relevance of having single or multiple aPL positivity.     

14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force. Report on antiphospholipid syndrome laboratory diagnostics and trends

Current classification criteria for definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) require the use of three laboratory assays to detect antiphospholipid antibodies (aCL, anti-β2GPI and LA) in the presence of at least one of the two major clinical manifestations (i.e. thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity) of the syndrome. However, several other autoantibodies shown to be directed to other proteins or their complex with phospholipids have been proposed to be relevant to APS but their clinical utility and their diagnostic value remains elusive.This report summarizes the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the “APS Task Force 3—Laboratory Diagnostics and Trends” meeting that took place during the 14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies (APLA 2013, September 18–21, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil).     

Antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a disease characterized by venous and arterial thromboses or spontaneous abortions and the repeated detection of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). APS may be associated with another autoimmune disease (secondary APS), particularly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), or unrelated to an underlying disease (primary APS). APS affects almost all organs. In addition to the clinical criteria, lupus anticoagulant testing and immunological aPL determinations are required to establish the diagnosis of APS.     

Antiphospholipid Syndrome Infectious Origin

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by the presence of pathogenic autoantibodies against beta 2-glycoprotein-I (beta 2GPI). The factors causing production of anti-beta 2GPI remain unidentified, but an association with infectious agents has been reported. Studies on experimental APS models proved that molecular mimicry between beta 2GPI-related synthetic peptides and structures within bacteria, viruses, tetanus toxoid, and CMV are a cause for experimental APS. Any explanation of how microbial infections might set off APS must take into account the observation that all individuals appear to harbor potentially autoreactive lymphocytes, as well as natural antiphospholipid antibodies, but that these cells or antibodies remain innocuous unless somehow activated. Herein, we discuss the association of antiphospholipid antibodies in the infectious state, molecular mimicry as a proposed cause for development of APS, and the contribution of the database to this topic.     

Microthrombotic/Microangiopathic Manifestations of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome

The paper presents an overview of clinical manifestations and histopathologic findings in different organs in microvascular thrombotic and microangiopathic antiphospholipid syndrome (MAPS). Subsets of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are presented and defined. Clinico-pathologic correlations seem insufficient so far, because of a lack of detailed systematic studies of the histopathology in different organs. Based on their own autopsy and biopsy studies, the authors propose a novel categorization of histopathologic lesions that occur in patients with classic and catastrophic APS. In addition to the already accepted category of a microvascular thrombotic type of lesions, microangiopathic lesions consistent with thrombotic microangiopathy are proposed to be included in new revised classification criteria for definite APS. Microvascular thrombotic and so far underestimated microangiopathic histopathologic lesions have been shown to appear in various combinations and of different ages in patients with both classic and catastrophic APS, which fits into the concept of MAPS. These preliminary findings of our studies are also in line with the most recent hypothesis of two main mechanisms in the pathogenesis of APS, emphasizing a key role of endothelial cell affection induced by aPL on the one hand and interference with coagulation cascade on the other side.     

Revisiting Libman–Sacks Endocarditis: A Historical Review and Update

Libman–Sacks (LS) endocarditis was first described by Libman and Sacks in 1924, and is characterized by sterile, verrucous valvular lesions with a predisposition for the mitral and aortic valves. It is now regarded as both a cardiac manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus and, in recent years, of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Though typically mild and asymptomatic, LS endocarditis can lead to significant complications, including severe valvular insufficiency requiring surgery, infective endocarditis, and thromboembolic events, such as stroke and transient ischemic events. Improvements in imaging modalities, particularly in echocardiography, have allowed better estimation of the prevalence of the disease, but further investigation is still needed into its pathogenesis, treatment, and association with APS.