Extra-amniotic saline, laminaria, or prostaglandin E(2) gel for labor induction with unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine which of three methods of cervical ripening resulted in the lowest cesarean rate in women with unfavorable cervices and indications for labor induction. METHODS: Consenting women with singleton gestations, vertex presentations, and unfavorable cervices (dilatation under 2 cm and effacement under 75%) were randomly assigned to laminaria and standard intravenous oxytocin, serial doses of intracervical prostaglandin (PG) E(2) gel (Prepidil, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc., Kalamazoo, MI) 0.5 microg every 6 hours for two doses followed by oxytocin if indicated, or extra-amniotic saline infusion and oxytocin. RESULTS: An interim analysis after recruitment of 321 subjects, 67% of the planned sample, found similar cesarean rates for the three groups (laminaria 36%; PGE(2) gel 33%; saline infusion 29%; P =.59); however, the mean randomization-to-delivery interval was significantly longer in the PGE(2) group. Stochastic curtailment, as part of the interim analysis, indicated a low likelihood of achieving a statistically significant difference in cesarean rates between PGE(2) gel and the other two groups. Therefore, we completed the study with saline infusion and laminaria. The saline infusion and laminaria groups had similar preinduction characteristics. The cesarean rates were similar (saline infusion 25.4% versus laminaria 30.3%; P =.32), but the mean interval from randomization to delivery was shorter in the saline infusion group (18.0 versus 21.5 hours, P =.002). There were no significant differences in selected maternal and neonatal morbidities. CONCLUSION: Cervical ripening with extra-amniotic saline infusion, PGE(2), or laminaria resulted in comparable cesarean rates in women with an unfavorable cervix and indications for labor induction. Extra-amniotic saline infusion had the shortest randomization-to-delivery interval without increasing maternal or neonatal morbidity.     

A comparison of vaginally administered misoprostol with extra-amniotic saline solution infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare intravaginal misoprostol with extra-amniotic saline solution infusion with concomitant oxytocin for cervical ripening and labor induction in viable pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred women with indications for labor induction and unfavorable cervices were assigned randomly to vaginal misoprostol or extra-amniotic saline solution infusion. Twenty-five micrograms of misoprostol was administered every 4 hours up to six doses, followed by intravenous oxytocin administration. Patients who had received extra-amniotic saline solution infusion also received intravenous oxytocin along with a maximum 12-hour saline solution infusion through Foley catheters that were placed above the internal cervical os. RESULTS: One hundred women were randomly assigned to misoprostol, and 100 women were assigned randomly to extra-amniotic saline solution infusion. The average interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery was longer in the misoprostol group (1323.3 +/- 700.3 minutes) than in the extra-amniotic saline solution infusion group (970.4 +/- 502.7 minutes; P =.006, log transformed data). Abnormal fetal heart rate tracings were found in 30% of the patients who received misoprostol and in 19% of the patients who received extra-amniotic saline solution infusion (relative risk, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4; P =.05). There was more tachysystole in the misoprostol group (8%) than in the extra-amniotic saline solution infusion group (1%; P =.02). There were no differences in the routes of deliveries or neonatal outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: Extra-amniotic saline solution infusion with oxytocin administration appears more effective and is associated with fewer maternal complications than misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.     

Increased rates of chorioamnionitis with extra-amniotic saline infusion method of labor induction

OBJECTIVE: Extra-amniotic saline infusion has been shown to be equal to or more efficacious than misoprostol, laminaria, dinoprostone, and prostaglandin estradiol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Because of the introduction of a foreign body into the uterus, extra-amniotic saline infusion may potentially cause increased rates of chorioamnionitis. This study examines the risk of chorioamnionitis with extra-amniotic saline infusion compared with other methods of induction and spontaneous labor. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed based on deliveries at Bellevue Hospital Center, a tertiary-care facility, from August 2000 to December 2002. Three groups were identified: extra-amniotic saline infusion, other methods of induction, and spontaneous labor. Differences in chorioamnionitis rates were analyzed by using analysis of variance and multivariable logistic regression as appropriate. RESULTS: There were 625 charts evaluated: 171 extra-amniotic saline infusion, 190 other, and 264 with spontaneous labor. The rates of chorioamnionitis were 26.9%, 17.9%, and 13.3%, respectively. After adjusting for confounding variables, such as instrumentation, length of rupture, and number of exams, subjects who were induced with extra-amniotic saline infusion were significantly more likely to develop chorioamnionitis (relative risk = 2.2; 95% confidence interval 1.4, 4.0; P =.006). CONCLUSION: Extra-amniotic saline infusion may be associated with a greater risk of chorioamnionitis when compared with other methods of labor induction. Given the increased risk of chorioamnionitis associated with extra-amniotic saline infusion, its use should be in the context of a careful assessment of the risks and benefits of various methods of labor induction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2     

Balloon cervical ripening with extra-amniotic infusion of saline or prostaglandin E2: a double-blind, randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To compare extra-amniotic infusion of diluted prostaglandin (PG) E2 solution with saline infusion in balloon cervical ripening and labor induction. METHODS: Women with pregnancy complications and Bishop scores of 3 or lower (n = 116) were assigned randomly to receive extra-amniotic infusion (1 mL/minute) of normal saline or PGE2 in saline (0.5 microg/mL) through a Foley catheter with a 30-mL inflated balloon. We induced labor using intravenous oxytocin only when labor had not developed by 6 hours after balloon expulsion. Analysis was by intent-to-treat. We assessed ripening efficiency and course of labor in women who had spontaneous balloon expulsion (n = 110) and trial of labor (n = 107), respectively. RESULTS: Ripening with PGE2 was associated with significantly shorter mean (+/- standard error of the mean [SEM]) time for balloon expulsion (4.7 +/- 0.4 versus 6.5 +/- 0.6 hours) and with significantly higher Bishop scores (P <.002), compared with ripening with saline. In the PGE2 group, rates of labor induction (15%) and oxytocin use (37%) were significantly lower than in the saline group (51% and 72%, respectively). The groups did not differ significantly in other labor abnormalities, labor duration, mode of delivery, birth weight, Apgar scores, and puerperal morbidity. CONCLUSION: Cervical ripening by extra-amniotic balloon and PGE2 infusion is faster and more effective than by balloon and saline infusion, resulting in a higher rate of spontaneous labor and a lower rate of oxytocin use.     

Extra-amniotic saline infusion versus extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha for cervical ripening and induction of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of extra-amniotic saline infusion versus extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha for cervical ripening, induction of labor and achievement of vaginal delivery in patients with unfavorable cervices. METHOD: A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion versus extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha performed at Harare Central Hospital Maternity Unit, Zimbabwe. One hundred and sixty-four patients were recruited from those referred to Harare Central Hospital Maternity Unit who required induction of labor for either maternal or fetal indications. RESULTS: 162 patients (extra-amniotic PgF2alpha group, N = 81; extra-amniotic saline infusion group, N = 81) had complete information. Two patients (one from each group) were lost to follow up. The demographic characteristics of the patients and the indications for induction were not statistically different. There was a marginally statistically significant difference in the change of Bishop Score in favor of the extra-amniotic saline infusion (4.0, S.D. = 1.4) as compared to (4.5, S.D. = 1.5) for extra-amniotic PgF2alpha (P value = 0.047). All other parameters showed no statistically significant differences. Maternal and fetal complications were minimal and not significantly different. Extra-amniotic saline infusion was however almost six times cheaper than PgF2alpha. CONCLUSION: Extra-amniotic saline infusion is as effective as PgF2alpha, safe, but much cheaper than PgF2alpha and should be seriously considered as a method of first choice in resource-poor settings.     

A randomized trial of misoprostol versus extra-amniotic sodium chloride infusion with oxytocin for induction of labor

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of misoprostol and extra-amniotic sodium chloride infusion with oxytocin for induction of labor.Study Design: This randomized trial compared two methods of labor induction in women requiring cervical ripening. One hundred twenty-three women undergoing labor induction with a Bishop score < or =5 were randomly selected to receive either misoprostol, 50 microg intravaginally every 4 hours, or extra-amniotic sodium chloride infusion. The primary outcome variable was the time interval from induction to vaginal delivery. RESULTS: Sixty-one women received extra-amniotic sodium chloride infusion and 62 women received misoprostol. The mean time interval from the start of induction to vaginal delivery was 15.0 +/- 5.0 hours and 16.5 +/- 7.2 hours for the extra-amniotic infusion and misoprostol groups, respectively (P, not significant). The cesarean delivery rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups (32.8% for the extra-amniotic infusion group; 19.4% for the misoprostol group). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods of induction are equally efficacious and result in similar maternal and neonatal outcomes.     

Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, side effects, and complications of high-dose vaginal misoprostol with concentrated intravenous oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal prostaglandin (PGE(2)) for second-trimester labor induction. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six consenting women with maternal or fetal indications for pregnancy termination and no prior cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to receive either vaginal misoprostol 600 microg 1x, 400 microg every 4 hours 5x (misoprostol group, n = 60) or escalating-dose concentrated oxytocin infusions (277-1,667 mU/min) plus vaginal PGE(2) 10 mg every 6 hours 4x (oxytocin group, n = 66). Both groups received concurrent extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening. Women who failed their assigned regimen received 20 mg of PGE(2) suppositories every 4 hours until delivery. Analysis was by intent to treat. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar between study groups. Median induction-to-delivery interval was significantly shorter in the misoprostol group (12 hours) than in the oxytocin group (17 hours; P <.001). There was a higher induction success rate at 24 hours in the misoprostol group (95%) than in the oxytocin group (85%; P =.06), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. The incidence of live birth (25% versus 17%), chorioamnionitis (5% versus 2%), and postpartum hemorrhage greater than 500 mL (3% versus 3%) were similar between the misoprostol and oxytocin groups, respectively. Diarrhea (2% versus 11%; P =.04), nausea/emesis (25% versus 42%; P =.04), and retained placenta requiring curettage (2% versus 15%; P =.008) were significantly less common in the misoprostol group when compared with the oxytocin group, respectively. Isolated intrapartum fever, however, was more frequent in the misoprostol group (67%) than in the oxytocin group (21%; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal PGE(2), high-dose vaginal misoprostol is associated with significantly shorter induction-to-delivery intervals, fewer side effects, a lower incidence of retained placenta, and comparable incidence of live birth.     

The contribution of laminaria placement for cervical ripening in second trimester termination of pregnancy induced by intra-amniotic injection of prostaglandin F(2)alpha followed by concentrated oxytocin infusion

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether intracervical placement of laminaria stalks would improve the effectiveness of inducing termination of pregnancies in the second trimester by intra-amniotic injection of prostaglandin F(2)alpha. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at Gynecology Department, Lis Maternity Hospital. Fifty women admitted for indicated second trimester pregnancy termination were randomly assigned to receive either intracervical placement of laminaria (n = 25) or not (n = 25), with concurrent use of intra-amniotic injection of prostaglandin F(2)alpha and concentrated oxytocin. The outcome measures were: time from induction to delivery and the side effects and complications of treatment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean interval from induction to delivery in the laminaria and no laminaria groups, being 20 +/- 1.3 (8-30) h versus 19 +/- 1.0 (8-26) h, respectively. In addition, this interval was not different in subgroups of primiparas or multiparas. Other outcome measures such as retained placenta (4% in both groups), post-partum hemorrhage (4% in both groups) gastro-intestinal side effects, fever, and use of analgesia were not significantly different between both groups. CONCLUSION: We found no additional value in placing laminaria stalks when using intra-amniotic injection of prostaglandin F(2)alpha followed by concentrated oxytocin infusion for second trimester termination of pregnancy.     

Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to determine whether the addition of extra-amniotic saline infusion improves the efficacy of the Foley catheter in women undergoing cervical ripening and induction of labor with an unfavorable cervical examination. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred consenting women with a Bishop score less than 5 with singleton gestation, intact membranes, vertex presentation, who required induction of labor were randomly assigned to 2 groups: Foley alone (Foley, n=49) or to the Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion (EASI, 30 mL of NS per hour infused through the distal port of the Foley, n=51). All women received concurrent dilute oxytocin infusion per protocol. The primary analysis was intent to treat. Nonparametric tests were used as indicated. RESULTS: At randomization, the groups were well balanced for potential confounders including: parity, gestational age, prior cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, mean dilation, effacement, and Bishop score. There were no differences between the groups for time to delivery (Foley 17.7 +/- 10.5 hours vs EASI 17.4 +/- 11.7 hours, P=.9), the proportion of women delivered before 24 hours (Foley 41/49 [84%] vs EASI 39/51 [77%], P=.37) or cesarean rates (Foley 9/49 [17.7%] vs EASI 9/51 [18.4%], P=.92). There were also no differences in complications, including chorioamnionitis, endometritis, and neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSION: EASI does not increase the efficacy of cervical ripening and induction of labor with a Foley catheter and concurrent oxytocin infusion.     

Sequential use of Prepidil and extra-amniotic saline infusion for the induction of labor in nulliparous women with very low Bishop scores.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of sequential use of Prepidil (prostaglandin E2 gel) and extra-amniotic saline infusion for the induction of labor in nulliparous women with very low Bishop scores. STUDY DESIGN: Nulliparous women with singleton gestations, intact membranes and a cervical Bishop score of < or = 2 who received Prepidil gel and extra-amniotic saline infusion sequentially for the induction of labor between July 1996 and July 1998 were studied. RESULTS: Thirty-one women met the inclusion criteria. Indications for induction included post-dates (six of 31), pre-eclampsia (ten of 31), diabetes (three of 31), oligohydramnios (three of 31), intrauterine growth restriction (two of 31) and non-reactive non-stress test (NST) (seven of 31). The average time from onset of induction to delivery was 38.1 +/- 13.5 h. Vaginal delivery was achieved in 80.6%. Women requiring > 2 doses of Prepidil had a higher risk of delivering abdominally (OR = 3.5). Three of seven (42.9%) women with labor induced for non-reactive NST but only three of 24 (12.5%) with labor induced for other indications had a Cesarean section delivery (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nulliparous women with very unfavorable cervices can be counselled that they have an 80% chance of vaginal delivery using sequential Prepidil and extra-amniotic saline infusion as an induction method, with 90% delivering within the first 48 h.     

A randomized comparison of extra-amniotic saline infusion and intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening

Objective: To compare extra-amniotic saline infusion to intracervical dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening.Methods: Women with Bishop scores less than 5 were assigned randomly to either extra-amniotic saline infusion (n = 26) or intracervical dinoprostone gel (n = 26) for preinduction cervical ripening. A sample size of 50 would have 80% power to detect a 10-hour difference in the mean time from start of cervical ripening to delivery for the two methods of intervention, with a type I error of .05.Results: The study populations were similar in age, gestational age, and initial Bishop score. They differed in parity, with 22 nulliparas in the extra-amniotic saline infusion group versus 13 in the dinoprostone gel group (relative risk [RR] 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11, 2.57). The number of women achieving a favorable Bishop score at 6 hours was greater with extra-amniotic saline infusion (n = 20) than dinoprostone gel (n = 9) (RR 2.14, 95% CI 1.22, 3.75). Mean time from start of ripening to delivery was 25.9 hours with extra-amniotic saline infusion and 30.2 hours with dinoprostone gel (P = .25). Birth weight, Apgar scores, umbilical artery pH, and infectious morbidity were similar between groups.Conclusion: More women achieved a favorable Bishop score at 6 and 12 hours after the start of cervical ripening with extra-amniotic saline infusion compared with dinoprostone gel. Saline infusion is as safe as dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening.     

Comparative study of cervical laminar tents prior to extra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate (Rivanol) and a condom-nelathon catheter method for second-trimester pregnancy interruption in Vietnam.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the regimen for termination of second-trimester pregnancies using laminaria tents 12-24 h prior to extra-amniotic ethacridine lactate (Rivanol) instillation, is more effective in shortening the insertion-expulsion interval than the presently used method of abortion induction by a condom/Nelathon catheter. DESIGN: A prospective randomised comparative study was performed at Uong Bi General Hospital in Quang Ninh Province, Vietnam, on 91 women undergoing pregnancy termination in the second trimester. INTERVENTIONS: The subjects were randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups, receiving either the Nelathon catheter-condom method (n = 50) or by insertion of a laminaria tent into the cervical canal for preinduction, 13-29 h before extra-amniotic instillation of ethacridine lactate (n = 34). Seven subjects were not pretreated with the laminaria tent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The insertion-expulsion intervals and the incidence of side effects were assessed. RESULTS: The mean insertion-expulsion interval in the 2 groups was not significantly different (mean 27.5 +/- 16.1 and 26.4 +/- 16.4 h, respectively), calculating the insertion-expulsion interval from the start of active treatment, i.e. from the instillation of Rivanol or insertion of the Nelathon catheter and condom, until expulsion of the fetus. CONCLUSIONS: The laminaria-Rivanol method for pregnancy interruption is not more advantageous than the existing Nelathon catheter-condom method. Simple, successful and cost-effective methods in achieving second-trimester abortion in the Vietnamese context have therefore to be identified and tested.     

Labor induction with vaginal misoprostol and extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha gel.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of vaginally administered misoprostol with extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) gel for induction of labor. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial, with women allocated to receive either misoprostol 50 microg intra-vaginally or extra-amniotic PGF2alpha gel 5 mg, was conducted in Harare Maternity Hospital. A total of 152 women were admitted for induction of labor with a term singleton, pregnancy and cephalic presentation were recruited. The main outcome was duration of induction. RESULTS: There were no differences in the characteristics of women in the two groups at recruitment. In the misoprostol group there was a significantly reduced need for augmentation of labor with oxytocin (OR=0.36; 95% C.I. 0.17-0.73) and delivery by cesarean section for failure to progress (OR=0.11; 95% C.I. 0.00-0.88). The risk for duration of induction to vaginal delivery exceeding 12, 18 or 24 h was reduced by 18%, 38% and 68%, respectively, but only the risk for duration >24 h was significantly reduced (OR=0.32; 95%C.I. 0.11-0.91). The mean duration of induction was shorter in the misoprostol group, 15.2 vs. 23.6 h (P=0.02). There were no differences in fetal outcome. CONCLUSION: Misoprostol 50 microg was associated with less use of oxytocin in labor, a shorter induction to delivery interval and fewer cesarean sections for failure to progress when compared with extra-amniotic PGF2alpha gel.     

Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of transcervical Foley catheter alone (Foley) to transcervical Foley catheter with extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction and cervical ripening in women with an unfavorable cervix. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of women presenting for labor induction with a singleton, cephalic fetus, intact membranes, and unfavorable cervix (Bishop score 6 or less). Eligible women were randomly assigned to receive either Foley catheter alone or Foley catheter with extraamniotic saline infusion. All women received concurrent oxytocin administration. The primary study outcome was the induction-to-delivery interval. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery, maternal infectious outcomes, and immediate neonatal outcomes. Analysis was by intent to treat. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-eight women met eligibility criteria and were randomly assigned (Foley plus extraamniotic saline infusion, n=97; Foley, n=91). Baseline demographic characteristics, including parity, gestational age, and Bishop score were similar between the study groups. The median induction-to-delivery interval in the extraamniotic saline infusion arm (12.6 hours, interquartile range 9.3-18.8 hours) was similar to that in the Foley arm (13.4 hours, interquartile range 9.6-17.5 hours) (P=. 70). The proportion of women delivered by 24 hours was comparable between groups (delivery 24 hours, extraamniotic saline infusion 89.7%, Foley 87.9%, P=.70), as was the rate of cesarean delivery (Foley 18.7%, extraamniotic saline infusion 27.8%, P=.14). No significant differences were noted between the study groups with respect to rate of chorioamnionitis, endometritis, or immediate birth outcomes. CONCLUSION: In women with an unfavorable cervix, the addition of extraamniotic saline infusion to a transcervical Foley catheter does not improve efficacy for labor induction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00442663 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.     

Comparison of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial

Objective: To compare the efficacy of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion and the Cook cervical ripening balloon. Methods: Women at term with a singleton pregnancy who presented for labor induction were randomly assigned to the Foley catheter or the Cook cervical ripening balloon (costs $3 and $41, respectively). The main outcome measures included time from device insertion to delivery, rates of successful vaginal delivery and occurrence of adverse events. Results: The study was completed by 188 women. Time from balloon insertion to expulsion and from insertion to delivery was significantly shorter in the Foley catheter group when compared with the Cook cervical ripening balloon group (6.9 ± 4.2 vs. 10.1 ± 4.7 hours, p = .001 and 19.6 ± 11.4 vs. 23.4 ± 15.5 hours, p = .03, respectively). There were no significant differences in other outcomes. Conclusions: Considering its shorter induction process and lower cost, Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion is superior to the Cook cervical ripening balloon for initiating cervical ripening.     

The effect of vaginal pH on the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor

BACKGROUND: Misoprostol was reported to be an effective agent for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Our purpose was to evaluate whether vaginal pH affected the efficacy of misoprostol for induction of labor. METHODS: The vaginal pH of 103 women admitted for induction of labor were measured. According to the vaginal pH, two groups were generated, those with a vaginal pH <5 (n= 65), and those with a vaginal pH > or =5 (n=38). All women received intravaginal misoprostol tablets, 50 microg every 4 hours up to three doses. Further medication was not given after entry into active labor or spontaneous rupture of membranes. In cases of failed induction or arrest disorders oxytocin augmentation was used. RESULTS: The average interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery was shorter, and oxytocin augmentation was required less commonly in the lower pH group. We did not find any significant difference in cesarean section rates, or incidence of adverse maternal or fetal outcome. CONCLUSION: Vaginal pH may affect the pharmacokinetics of vaginally administered misoprostol, and may cause an alteration in induction to delivery interval.     

Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis and its effect on uterine activity during established premature labor in sheep.

OBJECTIVE: Continuous infusion of the selective prostaglandin synthase type-2 inhibitor nimesulide, together with the oxytocin receptor antagonist atosiban, inhibits glucocorticoid induction of labor in sheep. We evaluated the effectiveness of this treatment commencing after the onset of premature labor when prostaglandin concentrations are already significantly elevated. METHODS: Premature labor was induced in chronically cannulated fetuses by constant fetal dexamethasone infusion. After the onset of active labor in each ewe, defined as uterine electromyographic (EMG) activity twice basal levels, ewes received combined nimesulide and atosiban (20.0 and 4.12 mg/kg per day, respectively; n = 6) or vehicle (n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone and saline each 1 mL/hour; n = 4) infusions for 48 hours. Maternal and fetal plasma PGFM (13,14-dihydro-15-keto PGF2alpha, the stable metabolite of prostaglandin (PG) F2alpha) and PGE2 concentrations were measured before, during, and after infusions. RESULTS: Four nimesulide- and atosiban-treated ewes successfully completed the 48-hour infusion period with no deliveries occurring during inhibitor treatment, or up to 6 hours after inhibitor treatment. Delivery was delayed in two other ewes, compared with control animals. Uterine EMG activity in nimesulide- and atosiban-treated ewes (n = 4) was significantly reduced during the 48-hour inhibitor treatment period. Maternal and fetal prostaglandin concentrations were significantly decreased in inhibitor-treated ewes during and after the infusions. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of nimesulide and atosiban treatment for 48 hours successfully inhibited the progression of active premature labor to delivery. This study further supports the potential value of this treatment regime for the inhibition of premature labor.     

Evaluation of the effect of extra-amniotic normal saline infusion alone or in combination with dexamethasone for the induction of labor

AIM: To compare the effect of extra-amniotic normal saline solution infusion on its own, and in combination with dexamethasone on the ripening of the cervix and induction of labor. METHODS: A double-blind randomized clinical trial study was performed at Akbar Abadi Teaching Hospital in Tehran, Iran, between March 2002 and March 2003 on 84 pregnant women at a gestational age of 40 weeks or more, and with a Bishop score 相似文献   

A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare orally administered with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty subjects with medical or obstetric indications for labor induction and undilated, uneffaced cervices were randomly assigned to receive orally administered or vaginally administered misoprostol. Fifty micrograms of oral misoprostol or 25 microgram of vaginal misoprostol was given every 4 hours. If cervical ripening (Bishop score of >/=8 or cervical dilatation of >/=3) or active labor did not occur, repeated doses were given to a maximum of 6 doses or 24 hours. Thereafter, oxytocin was administered intravenously by a standardized incremental infusion protocol to a maximum of 22 mU/min. RESULTS: Of the 220 subjects evaluated, 110 received orally administered misoprostol and 110 received vaginally administered misoprostol. Fewer subjects who received the oral preparation (34/110, 30.9%) were delivered vaginally within 24 hours of initiation of induction, in comparison with those who received the vaginal preparation (52/110, 47.3%) (P =.01). The average interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery was nearly 6 hours longer in the oral treatment group (mean and SD 1737.9 +/- 845.7 minutes) than in the vaginal treatment group (mean and SD 1393.2 +/- 767.9) (P =.005, log-transformed data). Orally treated patients required significantly more doses than vaginally treated patients (orally administered doses: mean and SD 3.3 +/- 1.7; vaginally administered doses: mean and SD 2.3 +/- 1.2) (P <.0001). Oxytocin administration was necessary in 83 (75.4%) of 110 orally treated subjects and in 65 (59.1%) of 110 vaginally treated subjects (P =.01, relative risk 1. 28, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.54). Vaginal delivery occurred in 95 (86.4%) orally treated subjects and in 85 (77.3%) vaginally treated subjects (P =.08, relative risk 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.27), with the remainder undergoing cesarean delivery. There was no difference in the incidence of uterine contractile abnormalities (tachysystole, hypertonus, or hyperstimulation), intrapartum complications, or neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral administration of 50-microgram doses of misoprostol appears less effective than vaginal administration of 25-microgram doses of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Further investigation is needed to determine whether orally administered misoprostol should be used for cervical ripening and labor induction.     

Laminaria and sulprostone in second trimester pregnancy termination for fetal abnormalities.

The efficacy and safety of intracervical placement of laminaria and intravenous prostaglandin E2 (sulprostone) infusion for termination of second-trimester pregnancies with abnormal fetuses was investigated. One hundred and six pregnant women at 13-29 weeks' gestation with fetal anomalies underwent laminaria tent insertion into the cervical canal on admission. The next morning, Sulprostone infusion was started at a rate of 16 microg/h and increased by 16 microg/h every 30 min to induce uterine contractions. Induction-to-abortion time (IAT), success and complete abortion rates, and sulprostone-related side effects were registered. The overall success and complete abortion rates within 24 h were 91.5 and 80.2%, respectively. The mean IAT was 12.1+/-7.6 h. The incidence of nausea and/or vomiting was 17.9%, with 1.7 episodes per case. Diarrhea and fever (9.5%) were not common. Laminaria tent insertion plus sulprostone infusion was an effective and safe regimen for second-trimester termination of pregnancy with live fetuses.