帕金森病患者运动并发症的调查分析

目的 调查帕金森病(PD)患者中异动症及症状波动的发生率、分布情况以及影响因素.方法 详细记录患者资料,并进行统一帕会森病评分量表(UPDRS)、Hoehn＆Yahn(H-Y)分级评分.根据UPDRS Ⅳ记录患者有无异动症及症状波动.结果 122例患者接受左旋多巴治疗,疗程至少6个月.其中15例(12.3%)合并异动症,41例(33.6%)合并症状波动.异动症的独立影响因素为:发病年龄(OR=0.907,P<0.01)和左旋多巴总量(95%C/1.000～1.004,OR=1.002,P<0.05);症状波动的独立影响因素为:发病年龄(OR=0.922,P<0.05),接受左旋多巴治疗的时间(OR=1.234,P<0.05),左旋多巴总量(95%CI 1.002～1.008,OR=1.005,P<0.01)和H-Y分级(OR=1.869,P<0.05).结论 本组患者异动症及症状波动的发生率均低于欧洲调查结果,每日左旋多巴总最是异动症及症状波动的独立影响因素.添加其他药物辅助治疗而减少左旋多巴用量,可以减少运动并发症的发生.     

Long-term, open-label study of once-daily ropinirole prolonged release in early Parkinson's disease

Long-term safety and efficacy of once-daily ropinirole prolonged release (PR) were evaluated in subjects with early Parkinson's disease (PD). Subjects (n = 83) who completed one of two studies were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter, extension study, and followed for up to 78 months. Ropinirole PR was titrated/continued, and adjusted as appropriate during the maintenance phase (maximum 24 mg/day). L-dopa and other non-dopamine agonist PD medications were permitted. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs). Efficacy outcomes included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II and III scores, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scores. The median duration of ropinirole PR exposure was 1,069 days. Most subjects (97.6%) reported at least one AE, most commonly (≥ 30%) nausea (42.2%), dizziness (41.0%), peripheral edema (38.6%), back pain (33.7%), and headache (31.3%). Seventeen (20.5%) subjects discontinued due to an AE. UPDRS and CGI scores indicated that the clinical status of subjects was maintained throughout the treatment period. In patients with early PD, long-term treatment with once-daily ropinirole PR was not associated with any new safety concerns, and was effective in maintaining clinical status. These results support the extended use of ropinirole PR for treatment of PD.     

Differential progression of motor impairment in levodopa-treated Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To monitor comparative progression of clinical impairment over 4 years in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who present on levodopa at two different levels of Hoehn and Yahr (HY) stages, II and III. BACKGROUND: The rate of clinical impairment progression in patients with PD being treated with levodopa has not been studied in detail using current, standardized assessment tools. Sample size estimates for all levodopa adjunctive treatment studies and proper definition of study groups require a solid estimate of longitudinal motor impairment progression. DESIGN/METHODS: From our computer database, we identified two groups of patients with PD being treated with levodopa based on their initial HY stage at presentation to our center (II or III). Fifty randomly selected subjects in each stage were monitored in the ON state with annual Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores, dyskinesia ratings, and antiparkinsonian medication doses using a repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: The stage II and stage III subjects had similar disease duration. In stage II subjects, parkinsonian impairment was maintained without progression over 4 years, but in association with significantly higher dyskinesia scores and dopaminergic medication doses. In stage III subjects, UPDRS motor scores deteriorated despite more medication and increased dyskinesias. Of the established six factors comprising the UPDRS motor scale, bradykinesia accounted for the increased impairment. Initial UPDRS motor score and disease duration did not influence progression of motor impairment. CONCLUSION: In subjects with similar disease duration, progression of PD motor impairment differs significantly between stage II and stage III subjects over 4 years. Whereas in stage II subjects, parkinsonian impairment can be stabilized at the expense of increased dyskinesia and dopaminergic drugs, once subjects reach stage III, motor impairment progresses. Power estimates and sample size calculations for these groups of patients should be calculated separately.     

Ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a 16-week bromocriptine controlled study

Background: and objectives Ropinirole is a non-ergoline, selective dopamine D₂ agonist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) complicated by motor fluctuations. Methods: A total of 76 patients with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage II to IV) were included in this trial. Each patient was randomly allocated to receive either ropinirole (n = 37) or bromocriptine (n = 39) as an adjunct to levodopa over a 16-week period. Ropinirole and bromocriptine were titrated for optimal efficacy and tolerability. This optimal dose was then maintained for the rest of the study. Response rate was defined as the percentage of patients who achieved at least a 20 % reduction in levodopa dose. Clinical status was also assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and reduction in time spent ‘off’. Results: Ropinirole produced a significantly greater response rate than bromocriptine (odds ratio 2.995, 95 % C. I. (1.157, 7.751) p < 0.05). There was also a statistically significant difference between the groups in the proportion of patients who were ‘improved’ on the CGI improvement scale (91.9 % for ropinirole, 74.3 % for bromocriptine, p = 0.046). Other measures, including at least a 20 % improvement in the UPDRS motor score (70 % for ropinirole and 63.3 % for bromocriptine), and a 20 % reduction in ‘off’ duration (81 % for ropinirole and 52.4 % for bromocriptine) showed a trend in favour of ropinirole. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the overall incidence of adverse effects (ropinirole, 59.5 %; bromocriptine, 59 %). In each group, the most common side-effects were dizziness, dyskinesia and nausea/vomiting. No patients were withdrawn from the study because of side-effects. Conclusion: Ropinirole was found to be safe and well-tolerated. Ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of PD with motor fluctuation was associated with more significant reduction of levodopa dose and, on one form of analysis, with significantly greater improvement in CGI ratings than bromocriptine. On the other efficacy measures the two drugs were comparable. Received: 4 September 2001, Received in revised form: 8 May 2002, Accepted: 31 July 2002 This study was supported by SmithKline Beecham Korea and presented at the XIII International Congress on Parkinson's Disease, Vancouver, Canada, July 24–28, 1999. Correspondence to Joo-Hyuk Im, MD     

Ropinirole for the treatment of tremor in early Parkinson's disease.

The effect of Ropinirole on tremor in early Parkinson's disease (PD) was assessed. The results of three multicentre, randomized, double-blind trials comparing ropinirole monotherapy with levodopa, bromocriptine and placebo treatment were analysed retrospectively with respect to improvement of resting tremor and postural/action tremor as measured by items 20 and 21 of the motor section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Improvements in resting tremor were significantly better with ropinirole than placebo. There were no significant differences between the effect of ropinirole and those of levodopa (L-dopa) or bromocriptine on resting tremor. Postural/action tremor was mild in these early therapy studies, and there were no significant differences between treatment groups. These results suggest that ropinirole monotherapy is effective in treating resting tremor in early PD. On the other hand, response of postural/action tremor to dopaminergic treatment in early PD was not significantly better than to placebo at the dosages used in these trials.     

Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study

Preclinical studies suggest ropinirole (a D2/D3 dopamine agonist) may be neuroprotective in Parkinson's disease (PD), and a pilot clinical study using (18)F-dopa positron emission tomography (PET) suggested a slower loss of striatal dopamine storage with ropinirole compared with levodopa. This prospective, 2-year, randomized, double-blind, multinational study compared the rates of loss of dopamine-terminal function in de novo patients with clinical and (18)F-dopa PET evidence of early PD, randomized 1 to 1 to receive either ropinirole or levodopa. The primary outcome measure was reduction in putamen (18)F-dopa uptake (Ki) between baseline and 2-year PET. Of 186, 162 randomized patients were eligible for analysis. A blinded, central, region-of-interest analysis showed a significantly lower reduction (p = 0.022) in putamen Ki over 2 years with ropinirole (-13.4%; n = 68) compared with levodopa (-20.3%; n = 59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-13.06). Statistical parametric mapping localized lesser reductions in (18)F-dopa uptake in the putamen and substantia nigra with ropinirole. The greatest Ki decrease in each group was in the putamen (ropinirole, -14.1%; levodopa, -22.9%; 95% CI, 4.24-13.3), but the decrease was significantly lower with ropinirole compared with levodopa (p < 0.001). Ropinirole is associated with slower progression of PD than levodopa as assessed by (18)F-dopa PET.     

An open-label, multicentre clinical trial to determine the levodopa dose-sparing capacity of pramipexole in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease

Summary. Ninety-three patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) entered a 12 week open-label, baseline controlled, multicentre study. The study was designed to determine the levodopa sparing effect of pramipexole as add-on treatment in PD while maintaining an optimal clinical improvement in motor performance. The overall reduction in adjusted levodopa dose was the primary endpoint. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) subscores as well as motor fluctuations, frequency and severity of dyskinesia (assessed by patient diaries) were secondary endpoints. Pramipexole permitted a median reduction of adjusted levodopa by 40% while maintaining or improving the UPDRS scores in 61 patients (per protocol [PP] analysis). The intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis (90 patients) similarly revealed a median reduction of 40%. An anticipated short-term levodopa dose reduction as substantiated by 95% confidence interval calculations lies within a range of 35% to 50%. If unadjusted levodopa doses were considered, a median reduction of 42% (PP) or 43% (ITT) was achieved. 47% patients (ITT) had a levodopa dose reduction (adjusted) of more than 40% while maintaining or improving their level of efficacy, and 72.2% had a reduction of at least 20%. Motor fluctuations improved compared to baseline according to patient diaries and UPDRS part IV. These findings suggest that pramipexole can markedly reduce the daily levodopa dosage without deterioration of motor response and support that this new selective D2/D3 receptor agonist also improves later levodopa-associated motor complications. Received November 11, 1999; accepted April 7, 2000     

Relationship between weight, levodopa and dyskinesia: the significance of levodopa dose per kilogram body weight

Purpose:  Levodopa dose per kilogram body weight is reported to be a significant factor for dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease. We have investigated this hypothesis in data from the studies comparing ropinirole versus levodopa as the initial therapy.
Methods:  Data from the ropinirole versus levodopa studies 056 and REAL-PET in early Parkinson's disease were pooled and manipulated to calculate levodopa dose per kilogram body weight. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate significant variables for the development of dyskinesia. Only the patients on levodopa monotherapy or with ropinirole were analyzed.
Results:  Analysis of levodopa therapy patients revealed that dyskinetic patients had received significantly higher absolute levodopa dose and levodopa dose per kilogram body weight. Logistic regression revealed that the most significant factor was the higher levodopa dose per kilogram body weight, P  = 0.005, odds ratio 1.078, 95% CI 1.023–1.135; younger age was the second factor – P  = 0.026. Variables of gender, absolute levodopa dose, weight, disease duration and initial motor Unified Parkinson's disease rating score were not significant.
Conclusion:  Higher levodopa dose per kilogram body weight is an independently significant factor for developing dyskinesia. This relationship should be considered in treatment of Parkinson's disease patients aiming to prevent and manage dyskinesia.     

A comparison of sumanirole versus placebo or ropinirole for the treatment of patients with early Parkinson's disease.

To assess the safety and efficacy of sumanirole, a highly selective dopamine agonist, versus placebo and demonstrate its noninferiority to ropinirole, 614 patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) were treated with sumanirole, 1 to 16 mg/day; ropinirole, 0.75 to 24 mg/day; or placebo. Primary end point in this flexible-dose, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study of 40 weeks was the change in total sum of the United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II + III scores from baseline to end of maintenance. Approximately half the subjects in the sumanirole and placebo groups withdrew early from the study, most (51.8% and 68.5%, respectively) due to lack of efficacy. Of the ropinirole subjects who withdrew (50.5%), most discontinued because of adverse events. In sumanirole and ropinirole groups, mean changes from baseline of -2.48 and -5.20 in UPDRS II + III mean scores were significant versus 0.38 in the placebo group (P 相似文献   

Sarizotan as a treatment for dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

The objective of this study is to conduct a dose-finding study of sarizotan in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with dyskinesia to identify a safe dose and to identify a sensitive dyskinesia rating measure. Sarizotan is a novel compound with full 5-HT(1A) agonist properties and additional high affinity for D(3) and D(4) receptors. An open label study documented improvements in PD patients with levodopa-induced dyskinesia. There is no precedent for study designs or outcome measures in pivotal trials of antidyskinesia therapies. The approach used here was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel study. Included were PD patients optimized to levodopa and dopaminergic drugs with moderately disabling dyskinesias present greater than or equal to 25% of the waking day. Interventions included sarizotan 2, 4, or 10 mg/day or matching placebo, given in two doses. There were two outcome measures: the primary measure was change from baseline in diary-based on time without dyskinesia; the secondary measures were change from baseline in scores on the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), the composite score of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Items 32+33 (dyskinesia duration and disability) and total UPDRS. A total of 398 subjects were randomized, with 381 included in the intention-to-treat population. No significant changes occurred on sarizotan compared to placebo on any diary-based measure of dyskinesia or the AIMS score. The composite score of UPDRS Items 32+33 was significantly improved with 2 mg/day sarizotan, with a trend at 10 mg/day. Adverse events were not significantly different in sarizotan- and placebo-treated patients, but off time significantly increased with sarizotan 10 mg/day. Sarizotan 2 mg/day is a safe agent in PD patients with dyskinesia. To test its role in abating dyskinesia, future studies should focus on this dose and will use the composite score of UPDRS Items 32+33 as the primary outcome.     

Sumanirole versus placebo or ropinirole for the adjunctive treatment of patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.

The aims of this study were to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of sumanirole, a highly selective D(2) dopamine receptor agonist, versus placebo in subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), and to demonstrate noninferiority of sumanirole to ropinirole. In this flexible-dose, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 948 subjects were treated with sumanirole 1 to 48 mg/day, ropinirole 0.75 to 24 mg/day, or placebo. Treatment consisted of 13 weeks of dose escalation, 26 weeks of maintenance, and 1 week of tapering. Approximately 70% of subjects treated with either sumanirole or ropinirole completed the study. Statistical significance (P < 0.0001) was achieved when both sumanirole and ropinirole groups were compared with placebo, with mean differences of -7.7 and -8.8 on combined sum of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part II (average on and off) and part III total scores at the end of maintenance. Noninferiority of sumanirole to ropinirole was also demonstrated, with a sumanirole minus ropinirole difference of 1.17 (90% CI: -0.56 to 2.89). Both dopamine agonists, sumanirole and ropinirole, were statistically superior compared with placebo as adjunctive therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, based on UPDRS II + III total score. Noninferiority of sumanirole to ropinirole was established, with comparable tolerability profiles.     

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for parkinson's disease after successful pallidotomy: clinical and electrophysiological observations.

Unilateral pallidotomy is an effective treatment for contralateral parkinsonism and dyskinesia, yet symptoms progress in many patients. Little is known about whether such patients obtain a useful response to subsequent bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS). Changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Motor and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores, medication requirements, and dyskinesias were measured. Clinical outcomes were compared to patients with de novo STN DBS. Neuronal recordings were performed. STN DBS resulted in a significant reduction in UPDRS Motor scores (42.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 26.9-57.4; P = 0.03), comparable with de novo STN DBS surgery (41%; 95% CI, 26-46%; P < 0.001). There was also less change in dyskinesia duration and disability scores (P = 0.017, 0.005). There were no side-to-side differences clinically or in the STN neuronal firing rates and patterns. Bilateral STN DBS is safe and efficacious in improving motor symptoms in patients with prior pallidotomy.     

Development of dyskinesias in a 5-year trial of ropinirole and L-dopa.

A 5-year trial of ropinirole and levodopa in early Parkinson's disease showed that ropinirole is associated with reduced incidence of dyskinesias. This post hoc analysis investigated whether the dyskinesia-sparing benefit of ropinirole is lost when levodopa is added to the regimen and evaluated other risk factors for developing dyskinesias. Patients receiving levodopa had a significantly higher risk of dyskinesias than those taking ropinirole monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 6.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.23-14.29; P < 0.001). When patients randomized to ropinirole were treated with supplementary levodopa, the development of dyskinesias was not significantly different from that in those receiving levodopa from the start (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.48-1.33; P = 0.39). However, the onset of dyskinesias was delayed by around 3 years compared with levodopa monotherapy. Adjusted analyses taking into account baseline and on-treatment factors that influenced use of supplementary levodopa or the development of dyskinesias produced similar results. In conclusion, the risk of developing dyskinesias during maintained initial ropinirole monotherapy is very low. Only once levodopa is added does the risk substantially change. Early use of ropinirole postpones the onset of dyskinesias, but these benefits decline when levodopa therapy is started, with no evidence of a subsequent rapid "catch-up" or a persisting preventive effect.     

Early piribedil monotherapy of Parkinson's disease: A planned seven-month report of the REGAIN study.

Piribedil is a D2 dopamine agonist, which has been shown to improve symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) when combined with L-dopa. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of piribedil monotherapy to placebo in patients with early PD over a 7-month period. Four hundred and five early PD patients were randomized (double-blind) to piribedil (150-300 mg/day) or placebo. L-dopa open-label supplementation was permitted. Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS III) score as the last observation on monotherapy over 7 months was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes were proportion of responders (UPDRS III improvement > 30%), patients remaining on monotherapy after 7 months, UPDRS III subscores, and UPDRS II. UPDRS III improved on piribedil (-4.9 points) versus a worsening on placebo (2.6 points; estimated effect = 7.26 points; 95% CI = 5.38-9.14; P < 0.0001). The proportion of responders was significantly higher for piribedil (42%) than for placebo (14%) (OR = 4.69; 95% CI = 2.82-7.80; P < 0.001). Piribedil significantly improved several UPDRS III subscores. UPDRS II improved on piribedil by -1.2 points, while it deteriorated by 1.5 points on placebo (estimated effect = 2.71; 95% CI = 1.8-3.62; P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients remaining on monotherapy after 7 months was greater in the piribedil group (OR = 3.72; 95% CI = 2.26-6.11; P < 0.001). Safety was consistent with that reported for other dopamine agonists, gastrointestinal side effects being the most common (22% of patients in piribedil group vs. 14% on placebo). Piribedil is effective and safe as early PD therapy.     

Efficacy of combining levodopa with entacapone on quality of life and activities of daily living in patients experiencing wearing-off type fluctuations

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) plus entacapone with levodopa/DDCI plus placebo on measures of parkinsonian disability and health-related quality of life (QoL) in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IV study was performed in 270 PD patients randomized to receive either entacapone 200 mg or placebo with each dose of their current levodopa regimen. The primary variables were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part II activities of daily living (ADL) and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ)-39 summary index. UPDRS parts I, III-VI, Global Assessment of Change, PDQ-39 subscores, and the Short-Form (SF)-36 and the European Quality of Life five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were included as secondary variables. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in ADL scores with levodopa/DDCI/entacapone compared with levodopa/DDCI/placebo at 5 and 13 weeks (-2.3 vs -0.7, respectively; P = 0.0001). However, no significant differences were observed between treatments using the PDQ-39 summary index. UPDRS part III (motor) scores significantly decreased in the levodopa/DDCI/entacapone group compared with the levodopa/DDCI/placebo group (-5.0 vs -2.9, respectively; P = 0.03). Similarly, the change in the investigators Global Assessment was significantly greater (P = 0.004) in the levodopa/DDCI/entacapone group. There were no significant differences between treatments for any of the PDQ-39 subscores, the SF-36 variables or the EQ-5D utility score. CONCLUSIONS: Levodopa combined with entacapone demonstrated good efficacy in terms of ADL, global function, motor performance and was well tolerated. However, this short-term study did not generate significant improvements in QoL.     

Improvements in nocturnal symptoms with ropinirole prolonged release in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease

Background: The 24‐week, double‐blind Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in PD–Adjunct (EASE‐PD Adjunct) study randomized patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) suboptimally controlled with levodopa to once‐daily placebo or adjunctive ropinirole prolonged release (2–24 mg/day). We investigated the effect of ropinirole prolonged release on nocturnal symptoms in these patients. Methods: Total and grouped item PD Sleep Scale (PDSS) scores were analyzed post hoc in patients with baseline PDSS total scores ≤ 100 (troublesome nocturnal symptoms) and >100. Results: Baseline PDSS total score was ≤ 100 in 93 of 198 (47%) and 89 of 189 (47%) patients receiving ropinirole prolonged release and placebo, respectively; this subgroup displayed evidence at baseline of greater daily awake ‘off’ time, reduced night‐time sleep and worse quality of life, than the PDSS >100 subgroup. Significant improvements with ropinirole prolonged release versus placebo in PDSS score from baseline to Week 24 last observation carried forward were observed for those with baseline PDSS ≤ 100 [adjusted mean treatment difference 9.0 (95% CI: 2.76, 15.33; P = 0.0051)], but not >100. The PDSS ≤ 100 subgroup demonstrated treatment benefits for PDSS groupings of motor symptoms on waking and global quality of sleep. Changes in daytime sleepiness were similar between treatment groups. The PDSS >100 subgroup demonstrated significant treatment benefit for global quality of sleep. The unadjusted odds ratio for a positive response with ropinirole prolonged release relative to placebo, for the PDSS ≤ 100 subgroup, was 2.90 (95% CI: 1.42, 5.95, P = 0.004). Conclusions: Once‐daily ropinirole prolonged release improves nocturnal symptoms in patients with advanced PD not optimally controlled with levodopa who suffer troublesome nocturnal disturbance.     

Rotigotine vs ropinirole in advanced stage Parkinson's disease: A double-blind study

ObjectiveTo confirm the superiority of transdermal rotigotine up to 16 mg/24 h over placebo, and non-inferiority to ropinirole, in Japanese Parkinson's disease (PD) patients on concomitant levodopa therapy.MethodsThis trial was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, three-arm parallel group placebo- and ropinirole-controlled trial. Four-hundred and twenty PD patients whose motor symptoms were not well controlled by levodopa treatment were randomized 2:2:1 to receive rotigotine, ropinirole (up to 15 mg/day) or placebo during a 16-week treatment period followed by a 4-week taper period. The primary variable was change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III (ON state) sum score from baseline to the end of the treatment period.ResultsThe difference in the change in the UPDRS Part III (ON state) sum score from baseline to the end of treatment between rotigotine and placebo groups was −6.4 ± 1.2 (95% CI: −8.7 to −4.1; p < 0.001), indicating superiority of rotigotine over placebo. The difference between rotigotine and ropinirole groups was −1.4 ± 1.0 (95% CI: −3.2 to 0.5), below the non-inferiority margin, indicating the non-inferiority of rotigotine to ropinirole. Application site reaction was seen in 57.7% of the patients in the rotigotine group and in 18.6% in the ropinirole group (P < 0.001). No other safety issue was noted.ConclusionsRotigotine was well tolerated at doses up to 16 mg/24 h and showed similar efficacy to ropinirole except that the application site reaction was much higher in the rotigotine group.     

Pergolide versus levodopa monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease patients: The PELMOPET study.

Dopamine agonists are used as initial treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) to reduce incidence and severity of motor complications. This paradigm is based on long-term studies, allowing "rescue" therapy with levodopa. The present strict monotherapy study (PELMOPET, the acronym for the pergolide-versus-L-dopa-monotherapy-and-positron-emission-tomography trial) evaluated the efficacy and safety of pergolide versus levodopa without levodopa "rescue" medication. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, 3-year trial compared pergolide monotherapy (n=148) with levodopa monotherapy (n=146) in dopamine-naive patients with early PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-2.5). Primary efficacy measures were clinical efficacy, severity and time to onset of motor complications, and disease progression. During the 3 years, severity of motor complications was significantly lower and time to onset of dyskinesia was significantly delayed in the group receiving pergolide (3.23 mg/day) compared with those receiving levodopa (504 mg/day). However, time to onset of motor complications was not longer in patients receiving pergolide after 3 years. Symptomatic relief (assessed by Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS], UPDRS II, and III, Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] severity, and CGI and Patient Global Impressions [PGI] improvement) was significantly greater in patients receiving levodopa. Adverse events led to discontinuation of therapy in 17.6% of pergolide patients and 9.6% of levodopa patients. This is the first study comparing strict monotherapy with a dopamine agonist versus levodopa in previously untreated early PD. In principle, both levodopa and a dopamine agonist such as pergolide seem to be suitable options as initial PD therapy. The choice remains with the treating physician based on the different efficacy and adverse event profiles.     

帕金森病患者自主神经功能障碍评估

目的：评估帕金森病（PD）患者中自主神经功能障碍症状发生比例、各症状分布的差异，及其与PD临床特点之间的关系。方法：应用SCOPA-AUT量表、统一帕金森病评分量表（UPDRS）、日常生活能力量表（ADL）、Hamilton抑郁量表和简易智能量表（MMSE）对116例原发性PD患者进行评估。结果：SCOPA-AUT总分和消化系统（GI）症状、排尿（UR）症状、体温调节（TH）症状、性功能（SX）症状评分均高于对照组，差异有极显著统计学意义（P=0．0001）。SCOPA-AUT总分与UPDRS评分、Hamilton抑郁量表评分呈正相关（P〈0．001），与生活质量ADL评分呈负相关（P〈0．001）。结论：自主神经功能障碍在PD早期就会出现，并随着疾病进展而加重，影响患者的生活质量。     

Onset of dyskinesia with adjunct ropinirole prolonged‐release or additional levodopa in early Parkinson's disease

Levodopa‐induced dyskinesia can result in significant functional disability and reduced quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The goal of this study was to determine if the addition of once‐daily ropinirole 24‐hour prolonged‐release (n = 104) in PD patients not optimally controlled with levodopa after up to 3 years of therapy with less than 600 mg/d delays the onset of dyskinesia compared with increasing doses of levodopa (n = 104). During the study, 3% of the ropinirole prolonged‐release group (mean dose 10 mg/d) and 17% of the levodopa group (mean additional dose 284 mg/d) developed dyskinesia (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale activities of daily living or motor scores, suggesting comparable efficacy between the two treatments. Adverse events were comparable in the two groups with nausea, dizziness, insomnia, back pain, arthralgia, somnolence, fatigue, and pain most commonly reported. Ropinirole prolonged‐release delayed the onset of dyskinesia with comparable efficacy to increased doses of levodopa in early PD patients not optimally controlled with levodopa. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society