Transurethral needle ablation for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: outcome after 1 year

PURPOSE: The aims of the study were to evaluate short-term effects on lower urinary tract symptoms and uroflowmetry and assess side effects of transurethral needle ablation of the prostate (TUNA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six men with a median age 68 years (range 53-77 years) were evaluated with symptom scores and voiding parameters before and at 3 and 12 months after TUNA. All treatments were performed in the outpatient department using topical anesthesia supplemented with sedoanalgesia. RESULTS: The International Prostate Symptom Score had decreased from 21.2 to 10.5 at 12 months postoperatively. Peak urinary flow was 10.9 mL/sec at baseline and was elevated to 13.7 mL/sec after 12 months. Residual urine volumes were unchanged. Postoperative urinary retention developed in 71% of the patients and had a mean duration of 6.3 (range 1-34) days. Postoperative perineal pain was noted by about half of the patients for the first 1 to 2 weeks. Painkillers were frequently used to reduce postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS: Transurethral needle ablation is a safe procedure suitable for the outpatient clinic. After short-term follow-up, statistically and clinically significant effects were observed on symptoms and uroflow. Long-term follow-up is mandatory to define the future role of this therapy.     

Phase I/II examination of transurethral ethanol ablation of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE: We assessed the safety of transurethral ethanol ablation of the prostate as a treatment for men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia and determined the efficacy of this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter randomized trial on 79 men, 50 to 79 years old, who had drug refractory voiding symptoms (International Prostate Symptom Score greater than 12) and prostate volumes of 30 to 80 cc. Ethanol was injected transurethrally into the prostate with a curved cystoscopic needle in men randomly assigned to 1 of 3 doses: 15%, 25% or 40% of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound. Followup evaluations were performed 1, 3 and 6 months later. Postoperative cystoscopy was performed on all patients to evaluate ablation extent and extraprostatic effects. Transrectal ultrasound volume determinations were obtained before and 6 months after transurethral ethanol ablation of the prostate. RESULTS: Adverse events were generally mild or moderate, and included hematuria (42.9%), irritative voiding symptoms (40.3%), pain/discomfort (25.6%) and urinary retention (22.1%). No serious adverse events were reported. Statistically significant improvements were seen in International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, maximum flow rate and prostate volume reduction (p<0.05). Improvements were consistently observed across the 3 groups without an apparent dose effect. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized clinical trial transurethral ethanol ablation of the prostate was safe and effective at 6-month followup. No serious adverse events were encountered. Although ethanol can safely ablate prostatic tissue, further studies will be necessary before widespread clinical application.     

Durability and cost-effectiveness of transurethral needle ablation of the prostate as an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate when alpha-adrenergic antagonist therapy fails

PURPOSE: We analyzed the adverse event profile, long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness of transurethral needle ablation of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia as an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate in men with symptoms uncontrolled by medical therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 71 men on a waiting list for transurethral resection of the prostate after failed medical therapy underwent transurethral needle ablation of the prostate. Symptom scores, uroflowmetry and residual urine were measured before and up to 10 years following treatment. Transrectal ultrasound and pressure flow studies were performed before, and 3 and 12 months following treatment, respectively. Treatment failure was defined as lower urinary tract symptoms progression requiring further therapy or associated with deteriorating quality of life assessment. RESULTS: Apart from transient postoperative urinary retention, no significant treatment emergent adverse events due to transurethral needle ablation of the prostate were observed. Treatment failure occurred in 58 men (83%) at a median of 20 months. A total of 36 men (51%) underwent invasive treatment (transurethral resection of the prostate 33, bladder neck incision 2, microwave thermal ablation 1), 2 men (3%) were deemed unfit for anesthesia and now practice clean intermittent self-catheterization, 14 men (20%) reported improvement following resumption of treatment with an alpha-adrenergic antagonist after transurethral needle ablation of the prostate and 6 men (9%) have experienced deterioration in lower urinary tract symptoms with reduction in quality of life assessment (International Prostate Symptom Score 3 or greater) but have declined further intervention. There were 12 men (17%) who remained symptom-free up to 10 years after transurethral needle ablation of the prostate. The estimated additional cost of treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms per man treated with transurethral needle ablation of the prostate during the 10-year followup was $1,377. CONCLUSIONS: Despite documented safety and lack of morbidity, the high re-treatment rate associated with transurethral needle ablation of the prostate renders it relatively expensive when viewed as a long-term alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia in men in whom medical therapy failed. Of men failing alpha-blockade therapy 20% will benefit from a combination of transurethral needle ablation of the prostate and alpha-blockade.     

Holmium: YAG Laser Resection of the Prostate Versus Visual Laser Ablation of the Prostate and Transurethral Ultrasound-Guided Laser Induced Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Background:
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the gold standard for treating symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) despite some perioperative morbidity. As a minimally-invasive alternative to TUR-P, a neodymium:YAG laser, and more recently a holmium:YAG laser, have been used in transurethral surgery for BPH. In order to assess the safety and efficacy of various BPH treatments, the outcome in patients treated with transurethral ultrasound-guided laser induced prostatectomy (TULIP), visual laser ablation of the prostate (VLAP) and holmium:YAG laser resection of the prostate (HoLRP) were retrospectively compared.
Methods:
From May 1995 to August 1996, 60 patients with symptomatic BPH underwent TULIP (n=20), VLAP (n=20), and HoLRP (n=20). All patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the IPSS quality-of-life score (QOL), maximum flow rate (MFR), prostate volume, and residual urine volume.
Results:
The preoperative mean IPSS was 18.5, 19.3, and 19.6 and the mean MFR was 6.3, 6.9, and 6.1mL/sec in the TULIP, VLAP, and HoLRP groups, respectively. At 1 month after surgery, the mean IPSS was 10.2, 9.5, and 4.7 and the mean MFR was 9.6, 1 3.4, and 1 8.7mL/sec while at 3 months the mean IPSS was 6.2, 6.1, and 3.6 and the mean MFR was 14.1, 1 6.0, and 21.5 mL/sec in patients treated with TULIP, VLAP, and HoLRP, respectively. No serious complication occurred in any patient.
Conclusion: Although HoLRP requires expertise, it appears to be a promising treatment modality for BPH.     

Impact of pre‐implant lower urinary tract symptoms on postoperative urinary morbidity after permanent prostate brachytherapy

Objectives: To assess the impact of baseline lower urinary tract symptoms on postoperative urinary morbidity in patients being treated for prostate cancer with 125‐I permanent prostate brachytherapy. Methods: A total of 104 prostate cancer patients were enrolled in this study. Their urinary morbidity was followed up using the International Prostate Symptom Score and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for 12 months or more after permanent prostate brachytherapy. Patients were classified into two groups based on their baseline International Prostate Symptom Score: the low International Prostate Symptom Score group (score ≤ 7) and the high International Prostate Symptom Score group (score ≥ 8). Urinary morbidity was estimated in each group based on the results of the International Prostate Symptom Score and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite measured before permanent prostate brachytherapy, and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the end of all radiation therapy. Results: The overall mean total International Prostate Symptom Score, International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life score, and urinary‐related scores for Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite were significantly worse at 1 month after the end of treatment, but they improved gradually after the treatment and recovered to the baseline level within 12 months. Even in the high‐International Prostate Symptom Score group, the International Prostate Symptom Score and International Prostate Symptom Score Quality of Life score were significantly worse at 1–3 months after permanent prostate brachytherapy, and then recovered to the baseline level without prolongation. Although the urination‐related Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite score in the high‐International Prostate Symptom Score group was significantly worse at 1 month after permanent prostate brachytherapy in comparison with that in the low‐International Prostate Symptom Score group, it recovered to the baseline level without prolongation. Conclusions: The present findings suggest that the presence of lower urinary tract symptoms before implantation does not prolong urinary morbidity after permanent prostate brachytherapy.     

A prospective study of transperineal prostatic block for transurethral needle ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Emory University Experience.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and role of transperineal prostate block in providing anesthesia during minimally invasive radio frequency thermal therapy of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 38 consecutive patients undergoing transurethral needle ablation for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were entered in this prospective study. All patients received transperineal prostatic block as the main method of anesthesia. A mixture of equal volumes of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine, each with epinephrine (1:100,000 concentration ratio) was used. Pain control during the instillation of transperineal prostatic block and transurethral needle ablation was assessed using a 10-point linear analog pain scale and questionnaire. RESULTS: Median patient age was 65.5 years (range 47 to 79), with 21% of men in the eighth decade of life. Median American Urological Association symptom score was 25.0 (range 14 to 35), bother score was 20.0 (11 to 28), quality of life score was 4.0 (3 to 6) and peak urinary flow rate was 8.9 cc per second (3.5 to 15.7). Median sonographic prostate volume was 35.0 cc (range 17 to 129). Median volume of anesthetic agent used was 40.0 cc (range 30 to 60) per case (1.1 cc solution per 1 cc prostate tissue). No adverse events were encountered. Median pain score was 3.3 (range 1 to 6) during instillation of transperineal prostatic block and 1.0 (0 to 6) during transurethral needle ablation. Transperineal prostatic block proved highly effective and was a satisfactory method of anesthesia during transurethral needle ablation as judged by postoperative questionnaire. No sedation, narcotic or analgesia was required. All procedures were performed in the outpatient cystoscopy suite or office setting without support of an anesthesia team or conscious sedation monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Transperineal prostatic block is a safe, convenient, effective and satisfactory method of minimally invasive anesthesia for transurethral needle ablation of the prostate in an outpatient office setting. Elderly patients and those at high surgical risk can be treated safely using this approach. Considerable cost saving is seen secondary to omission of charges related to anesthesia team support, recovery room facility and conscious sedation monitoring.     

Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate is a reliable minimal invasive technique for benign prostate hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was carried out. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The pooled estimates of maximum flow rate, International Prostate Symptom Score, operation time, catheterization time, irrigated volume, hospital stay, transurethral resection syndrome, transfusion, clot retention, urinary retention and urinary stricture were assessed. There was no notable difference in International Prostate Symptom Score between TURP and PKRP groups during the 1-month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months follow-up period, while the pooled Q_max at 1-month favored PKRP group. PKRP group was related to a lower risk rate of transurethral resection syndrome, transfusion and clot retention, and the catheterization time and operation time were also shorter than that of TURP. The irrigated volume, length of hospital stay, urinary retention and urinary stricture rate were similar between groups. In conclusion, our study suggests that the PKRP is a reliable minimal invasive technique and may anticipatorily prove to be an alternative electrosurgical procedure for the treatment of BPH.     

TRANSURETHRAL PROSTATIC RESECTION OR LASER THERAPY FOR MEN WITH ACUTE URINARY RETENTION: THE CLASP RANDOMIZED TRIAL

PURPOSE: Transurethral resection of the prostate is the standard operation for acute urinary retention, although laser prostatectomy is reportedly effective and safe. The ClasP (conservative management, laser, transurethral resection of the prostate) study compared transurethral prostatic resection and noncontact neodymium (Nd):YAG visual laser assisted prostatectomy for treatment of acute urinary retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial, analyses were by intention to treat and followup was at 7.5 months after randomization. Primary outcomes were treatment failure, and included International Prostate Symptom Score, International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life score, residual urine and flow rate. Secondary outcomes included complications, and duration of catheterization and hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 148 men were randomized to transurethral prostatic resection (74) and laser (74). There were fewer treatment failures after prostatic resection (p = 0.008) and fewer men after resection required secondary surgery for poor results (1 versus 7, p = 0.029). Maximum flow rates after transurethral prostatic resection were better than after laser (mean difference 4.4 ml. per second). Comparison of symptom and quality of life scores demonstrated that any clinically significant advantage for laser could be ruled out. Patients stayed a mean of 2 extra days in the hospital after resection. The duration of catheterization was greater after laser but significantly fewer major treatment complications were found with laser therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Transurethral prostatic resection was more effective, resulted in fewer failures than laser treatment and remains the procedure of choice for men with acute urinary retention.     

Rotoresection versus transurethral resection of the prostate: short-term evaluation of a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE: We compared in a prospective fashion the short-term outcome of rotoresection to transurethral resection of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 patients with bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized into 2 groups, rotoresection and transurethral resection of the prostate. Mean+/-SD patient age was 60.76+/-5.85 years in the rotoresection and 64.24+/-6.84 in the transurethral resection groups. All patients had an International Prostate Symptom Score of 8 or more, maximum free flow rate less than 15 ml per second, prostate volume 20 to 100 ml and prostate specific antigen 1 to 4 ng/ml. Pressure flow study revealed bladder outlet obstruction (Schafer's grade 3 or more). Patients were assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months by International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum free flow rate, transrectal ultrasound, pressure flow study, hemoglobin and urinalysis. RESULTS: At 6 months International Prostate Symptom Score decreased from 26.2+/-4.06 to 5.32+/-1.52 in the rotoresection group and from 22.84+/-4.56 to 7+/-1.4 in the transurethral resection group. Maximum free flow rate increased from 7.87+/-2.24 to 25.29+/-10.39 ml per second in the rotoresection group and from 9.44+/-2.29 to 25.2+/-5.8 ml per second in the transurethral group. Prostate volume decreased from 41.2+/-16.58 to 17.24+/-7.61 ml in the rotoresection group and from 40.6+/-16.93 to 18.28+/-8.75 ml in the transurethral group. Detrusor pressure at maximum flow and Schafer grade decreased from 79.84+/-26.8 cm H2O and 4.24+/-0.97 to 38.8+/-18.8 cm H2O and 1.24+/-0.93 in the rotoresection group, and from 63.04+/-21.08 cm H2O and 3.48+/-0.65 to 34.16+/-12.7 cm H2O and 1+/-0.7 in the transurethral group. Dilutional hyponatremia was higher with transurethral resection of the prostate (p=0.005) but no patient showed manifestations of the transurethral syndrome. Mild stress urinary incontinence was noted in 4 patients in the rotoresection group and in 3 in the transurethral group. CONCLUSIONS: Rotoresection is a safe and effective method of treating bladder outlet obstruction resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia, and its efficacy is comparable to transurethral resection of the prostate.     

Transurethral Needle Ablation of the Prostate: Report of Initial United States Clinical Trial

Purpose

We studied the efficacy and safety of transurethral needle ablation of the prostate for treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Materials and Methods

A total of 12 patients with symptomatic BPH underwent transurethral needle ablation of the prostate. Voiding outcomes, including American Urological Association symptom scores, bother scores, quality of life scores, peak urinary flow rates, residual urine volumes and urodynamic pressure flows, were measured with time, and immediate and short-term (6 months) complications were assessed.

Results

Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate was performed with local intraurethral lidocaine anesthesia in 11 patients and general anesthesia in 1. At 6 months there was a 61.7 percent improvement in American Urological Association symptom score (25.6 to 9.8, p = 0.0001), 61.1 percent improvement in bother score (18.8 to 7.3, p = 0.0002), 70.0 percent improvement in quality of life score (13.7 to 4.1, p = 0.0001), 73.0 percent increase in peak flow rate (7.8 to 13.5 cc per second, p less than 0.0001) and 54.9 percent decrease in the post-void residual (111 to 50 cc, p = 0.0457). Prostate volumes, maximum detrusor pressures and detrusor opening pressures decreased significantly. There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperatively, all 12 patients had mild dysuria for 1 to 7 days, 5 had transient urinary retention for 1 to 4 days, 3 had hematuria for 1 to 2 days and 1 had retrograde ejaculation.

Conclusions

This initial United States trial confirms previous experience, and shows that transurethral needle ablation of the prostate appears to be a simple, safe and efficacious procedure for treatment of symptomatic BPH. In addition, it can be performed in the majority of patients using topical urethral anesthesia.     

Randomized clinical trial comparing transurethral needle ablation with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results at 18 months

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) during an 18-months follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 59 patients older than 40 years were included in this study. The entry criteria were prostate size <70 g, maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) <15 mL/sec, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >13, and no suspicion of prostate cancer according to the clinical or laboratory findings. Of the patients, 26 (44%) were treated with TUNA and 33 (56%) with TURP. At 3 and 18 months of follow-up, Q(max), postvoiding residual volume (PVR), IPSS, and the quality of life (QOL) score were compared with the baseline values. The results were also compared in patients undergoing TUNA v TURP. RESULTS: Improvements in Q(max), PVR, IPSS, and QOL score were statistically significant for both groups at 3 and 18 months of follow-up. The increase in the mean Q(max) of the TURP group was higher than that in the TUNA group, whereas no significant differences were found in the two groups regarding improvements in IPSS and QOL score. There were no complications associated with the TUNA procedure, while 16 retrograde ejaculation, 4 erectile impairment, 2 urethral stenosis, and 1 urinary incontinence cases were observed after TURP. CONCLUSIONS: The TUNA procedure is an effective and safe minimally invasive treatment with negligible adverse effect for selected patients with symptomatic BPH compared with TURP. It should be considered as an alternative treatment option for younger patients who want to preserve sexual function.     

Impact of interventional therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia on quality of life and sexual function: a prospective study

PURPOSE: Treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), including minimally invasive therapy, can impair the quality of life. We prospectively determined the impact of 4 different interventional therapies on quality of life and sexual function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 173 patients were prospectively evaluated between February 1995 and August 1997. Treatment modalities consisted of standard transurethral resection of the prostate in 55 cases, transurethral microwave thermotherapy in 34, interstitial laser coagulation of the prostate in 42 and transurethral needle ablation in 42. Disease specific quality of life was assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life assessment index and BPH impact index. In addition, a self-reporting questionnaire was completed before and 3 months after treatment to determine the impact on sexual function. RESULTS: All 4 treatment groups showed significant improvement in the symptom score, International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life assessment score and BPH impact index score. Satisfaction with treatment was highest in patients treated with transurethral resection or laser coagulation. A mild to moderate decrease in erectile function was noted in 26.5%, 18.2%, 18.4% and 20.0% of the transurethral resection, microwave thermotherapy, laser coagulation and needle ablation groups, respectively, but there was no significant difference of mean pretreatment and posttreatment erectile function or libido scores in any group. Ejaculation loss or severe decrease in ejaculate volume was reported by 48.6%, 28.1%, 21.6% and 24.3% of the patients, respectively. Interestingly, 20 of the 44 patients (45. 5%) with loss of ejaculation or severe decrease in ejaculate reported deterioration of the sex life, while only 2 (3.6%) of the 56 without any change in ejaculate volume reported such deterioration. The association of ejaculatory dysfunction with an adverse impact on sexual activity was highly significant (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement in quality of life could be achieved with the present assessed interventional therapies. There was no significant change in sexual desire or erectile function with these therapies. Posttreatment sexual dysfunction appears to be mainly related to impaired ejaculatory function. Urologists should provide proper counseling regarding the possibility of this complication even in patients receiving minimally invasive treatment.     

Seeking evidence that cell kill guided thermotherapy gives results not inferior to those of transurethral prostate resection: results of a pooled analysis of 3 studies of feedback transurethral microwave thermotherapy

PURPOSE: We compared ProstaLund Feedback Treatment (PLFT) to transurethral prostate resection (TURP) in terms of efficacy and safety in a pooled analysis of 3 clinical studies with 1-year followup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall raw data on 183 patients with PLFT and 65 with TURP were pooled. All studies had identical inclusion criteria, and the efficacy and safety of the method were evaluated using the International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urine flow (Qmax), responder rate, bother score, prostate volume reduction and adverse events. RESULTS: The response rate was 85.3% and 85.9% in the PLFT and TURP groups, respectively. One-sided 95% CI analysis showed the noninferiority of PLFT vs TURP for this variable. Mean International Prostate Symptom Score was significantly decreased in the PLFT and TURP groups after 12 months (from 20.9 to 6.4 and 20.7 to 7.1, respectively). The 1-sided upper 95% CI of PLFT was within the noninferiority definition compared with that of TURP. The bother score decrease in the PLFT and TURP groups was not significant different (70.9% and 64.0%, respectively). An increase in Qmax from 7.7 to 16.1 ml per second 12 months after PLFT was noted, while the improvement in Qmax in the TURP group was higher (from 7.5 to 18.6 ml per second). The 1-sided lower 95% CI was close (0.76) but it did not attain the predetermined level of noninferiority (0.80). Mean transurethral ultrasound determined volume 12 months after PLFT and TURP was reduced by 32.8% and 58.1%, respectively. A significant correlation between the transurethral ultrasound determined prostate volume reduction and estimated cell kill was found (r = 0.456, p <0.000001). Serious adverse events with causality occurred in 15.4% of patients with TURP compared with 6.0% in those with PLFT (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Combined experience from our pooled analysis indicates that PLFT challenges TURP in terms of efficacy and safety after 1 year of followup.     

Advantages of transurethral rotoresection versus standard transurethral resection in the management of benign hyperplasia of the prostate

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The endourologic community is in search of safer and efficient alternatives to conventional transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). This research compared the efficacy of two transurethral resection techniques - conventional loop and rotoresection - in the surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2000 through December 2001, we randomized 128 BPH patients aged 55 to 74 years (average 61.4 +/- 2.7 years), all complaining of symptoms for prostatism for 1 to 14 years (average 4.5 +/- 1.5 years), to either transurethral rotoresection (TURotor; N = 58) or TURP (N = 70). The mean ages in the two groups were 67.53 +/- 7.21 years and 62.93 +/- 6.43 years, respectively. The diagnosis of BPH was made on the basis of patient history, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, uroflowmetry, and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration. Three months after surgery, we again measured the residual urine volume, uroflow, IPSS, and prostate size by ultrasonography. RESULTS: The TURotor took 30.1 +/- 10.2 minutes with an intraoperative blood loss of 130 +/- 25 mL. During the immediate postoperative period, an insignificant amount of blood was visible in the urine and irrigation fluid. We removed the catheter at 1.8 +/- 0.69 days. At 3 months' follow-up, the maximum uroflow rate (Q(max)) had increased to 19.87 +/- 6.77 mL/sec, and the residual urine volume had fallen to 38.75 +/- 18.84 mL. The average TURP lasted 42.1 +/- 13.2 minutes, or almost 30% longer than TURotor. The intraoperative blood loss averaged 21050 mL. The catheter was removed in 2.2 +/- 0.78 days. At 3 months, the Q(max) was 20.78 +/- 6.56 mL/sec, and the average amount of residual urine had fallen to 35.48 +/- 8.71 mL. CONCLUSION: Rotoresection is a promising alternative to conventional TURP because it affords almost bloodless, 30% faster removal of prostate tissue.     

Holmium laser enucleation for large (greater than 100 mL) prostate glands

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) using the transurethral soft tissue morcellator (TUSTM), as a primary surgical treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with prostate glands > 100 mL. METHODS: Eighteen patients with preoperative prostate volumes > 100 mL underwent the HoLEP procedure. The criteria for surgery were determined by a preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), a prior failure of medical therapy, and urinary retention. RESULTS: The mean preoperative IPSS and prostate gland size were 13.8 and 142.3 mL, respectively. The total energy used by the laser was 288.4 kJ. The mean catheter time was 23.8 h and, perioperatively, no patients had electrolyte abnormalities or required blood transfusions. The 3-week postoperative IPSS was 2.8, with minimum long-term complications. CONCLUSIONS: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with TUSTM is a safe and effective alternative to open prostatic surgery for glands > 100 mL.     

钬激光前列腺切除术应用体会

目的 探讨钬激光前列腺切除术HoLRP)的治疗体会。方法 2000年10月至2002年1月行HoLRP术10例，观察其手术并发症、术后留置导尿时间及治疗效果；如IPSS评分、最大尿流率。结果 无围手术期死亡或电切综合征发生，无需输血，术后平均置管2d，平均最大尿流率从术前的6．7mL/s增加至18．3mL/s，平均IPSS评分由23分降至7分。结论 HoLRP是一种安全有效的BPH新疗法，术中和术后并发症少，术后恢复快。     

Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate: outcome at 1 year

BACKGROUND: Urologists continue to search for alternatives to transurethral prostatectomy that carry a lower potential for complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients on the public waiting list for transurethral resection of the prostate, all spontaneously voiding, underwent transurethral needle ablation of the prostate (TUNA). Eight patients had a simultaneous bladder neck incision (BNI). Follow-up with International Prostate Symptom Scores and flow rate measurement was performed at 6 weeks, 7 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in flow rate and fall in symptom scores occurred out to 1 year after TUNA. Despite this result, six patients (24%) were not satisfied with their outcome and underwent a second endoscopic operation. CONCLUSION: In our hands, TUNA produced an unsatisfactory clinical result.     

A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED 1-YEAR CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING TRANSURETHRAL NEEDLE ABLATION TO TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Purpose

We assess the 1-year efficacy and safety of transurethral needle ablation of the prostate compared to transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Materials and Methods

A prospective, randomized clinical trial of 121 men 50 years old or older with symptomatic BPH was performed at 7 medical centers across the United States. Of the men 65 (54%) were treated with transurethral needle ablation of the prostate and 56 (46%) underwent transurethral resection of the prostate. Mean and percentage changes from baseline and between cohorts for American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, AUA bother score, quality of life score, peak urinary flow rate and post-void residual urine volume were measured at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following treatment. Length of procedure, hospitalization, type of anesthesia, post-procedure catheterization, side effects and sexual function were compared.

Results

Transurethral needle ablation and resection resulted in a statistically significant improvement in AUA symptom, bother and quality of life scores, peak urinary flow rate and post-void residual. At 1-year followup, needle ablation and resection were equally effective in enhancing quality of life. Needle ablation had less effect on sexual function, with resection being associated with a greater incidence of retrograde ejaculation. Needle ablation could be performed as an outpatient procedure with local anesthesia while resection required anesthesia and hospitalization. Needle ablation was associated with markedly fewer side effects than resection.

Conclusions

Compared to transurethral resection of the prostate, transurethral needle ablation of the prostate is an efficacious, minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic BPH that is associated with few side effects.     

A single injection of lidocaine as local anesthesia for ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the effectiveness of a single injection of lidocaine on patient tolerance of multiple needle biopsies of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 100 consecutive group 1 patients local anesthesia was achieved by a single bolus injection of 10 ml. lidocaine and multiple prostatic needle biopsies was performed under ultrasound guidance. At the end of the procedure patients were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding the level of pain. Answers were compared with those of 100 group 2 patients who underwent prostatic biopsy before the introduction of local anesthesia. RESULTS: Of the group 1 patients 93% had only slight discomfort during the procedure and 7% required a further 1 cc bolus of lidocaine. In 55% of group 2 patients the level of pain during the procedure was significant but bearable, in 35% it was considered unbearable and in 10% sedation with midazolam was necessary. There was no significant difference in complications in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: A single injection of local anesthesia for prostatic biopsy proved to be efficient, well tolerated by patients and effective for decreasing the pain associated with the procedure.     

经尿道等离子体电切加剜除术治疗BPH(附230例报告)

目的:探讨经尿道等离子体双极电切(TUPKVP)加剜除术治疗BPH的安全性和疗效.方法:回顾性分析经尿道等离子体双极电切加剜除术治疗BPH 230例临床资料.结果:手术操作45～150 min,术中平均失血(1004±20)ml.切除前列腺重量约12～90 g,平均(30±9)g.无经尿道前列腺电切综合征发生.23例(10%)术后膀胱痉挛;2例(0.8%)继发术后出血再次电凝止血.随访2～24个月,IPSS评分平均降至5分.无剩余尿.结论:经尿道等离子体前列腺电切术加剜除术具有安全性高、出血少,手术时间短、并发症少、疗效确切等优点.