Effect of montelukast on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers

Montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, is being developed for the treatment of asthma and related diseases. This study was designed to evaluate whether montelukast at clinically used dosage levels would interfere with the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. In a two-period, double-blind, randomized crossover study, 12 healthy male subjects received a single oral dose of 30 mg warfarin on the 7th day of a 12-day treatment with montelukast, 10 mg daily by mouth, or a placebo. Montelukast had no significant effect on the area under the plasma concentration-time curves and peak plasma concentrations of either R- or S-warfarin. However, slight but statistically significant decreases in time to peak concentration of both warfarin enantiomers and in elimination half-life of the less potent R-warfarin were observed in the presence of montelukast. These changes were not considered as clinically relevant. Montelukast had no significant effect on the anticoagulant effect of warfarin, as assessed by the international normalized ratio (INR) for prothrombin time (AUC0-144 and INR maximum). The results of this study suggest that a clinically important interaction between these drugs is unlikely to occur in patients requiring concomitant administration of both drugs.     

Effect of carisbamate on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy participants

Carisbamate's effect (200 mg twice-daily [study 1], 600 mg twice-daily [study 2]) on warfarin's (25 mg single dose) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (international normalized ratio) was assessed during 2 open-label studies in healthy participants. Coadministration of either carisbamate regimen produced small changes on the mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve to the last measurable time point (AUC(last)) of (S)- and (R)-warfarin, which are unlikely to be clinically significant. For (S)-warfarin, the ratios (with carisbamate/without carisbamate) of geometric means for C(max) were 105.44 (study 1) and 98.48 (study 2) and for AUC(last) were 109.33 (study 1) and 114.43 (study 2); the corresponding 90% confidence intervals were within the bioequivalence limits of 80% to 125%. Results were similar for (R)-warfarin. Carisbamate at 600 mg (but not 200 mg) twice-daily prolonged the elimination half-life of (S)- and (R)-warfarin by ~10 hours (25% and 32% increase, respectively). Prothrombin time was unaltered by either carisbamate dose. Adverse events with the highest incidence were dizziness (50%) and headache (50%) in study 1 and somnolence (56%) in study 2. Warfarin exposure and international normalized ratio were unaffected by coadministration of carisbamate 200 mg or 600 mg twice-daily. Carisbamate was well tolerated.     

Effect of nebicapone on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects

Objective  Nebicapone is a new catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor. In vitro, nebicapone has showed an inhibitory effect upon CYP2C9, which is responsible for the metabolism of S-warfarin. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of nebicapone on warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy subjects. Methods  Single-centre, open-label, randomised, two-period crossover study in 16 healthy volunteers. In one period, subjects received nebicapone 200 mg thrice daily for 9 days and a racemic warfarin 25-mg single dose concomitantly with the nebicapone morning dose on day 4 (test). In the other period, subjects received a racemic warfarin 25-mg single dose alone (reference). The treatment periods were separated by a washout of 14 days. Results  For R-warfarin, mean ± SD C_max was 1,619 ± 284 ng/mL for test and 1,649 ± 357 ng/mL for reference, while AUC_0-t was 92,796 ± 18,976 ng·h/mL (test) and 73,597 ± 11,363 ng·h/mL (reference). The R-warfarin test-to-reference geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (90%CI) were 0.973 (0.878–1.077) for C_max and 1.247 (1.170–1.327) for AUC_0-t . For S-warfarin, mean ± SD C_max was 1,644 ± 331 ng/mL for test and 1,739 ± 392 ng/mL for reference, while AUC_0-t was 66,627 ± 41,199 ng·h/mL (test) and 70,178 ± 42,560 ng·h/mL (reference). The S-warfarin test-to-reference GMR and 90%CI were 0.932 (0.845–1.028) for C_max and 0.914 (0.875–0.954) for AUC_0-t . No differences were found for the pharmacodynamic parameter (INR). Conclusion  Nebicapone showed no significant effect on S-warfarin pharmacokinetics or on the coagulation endpoint (INR). A mild inhibition of the R-warfarin metabolism was found but is unlikely to be of clinical relevance.     

Effect of moricizine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers.

Moricizine HCl, a new orally active antiarrhythmic agent, induces its own hepatic metabolism and consequently may interfere with the metabolism of warfarin, a drug used commonly by cardiac patients that also is subject to extensive hepatic metabolism. Both drugs are also highly protein bound in plasma. To assess the possibility of an interaction, single-dose sodium warfarin (25 mg oral Coumadin, Du Pont Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE) pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics; and plasma protein binding were examined in 12 healthy male volunteers 14 days before and 14 days after starting chronic oral moricizine HCl administration (250 mg every 8 hours). The terminal elimination rate constant of warfarin was increased by about 10% when measured in the presence of chronic moricizine administration. However, oral plasma clearance, apparent volume of distribution, maximum peak plasma concentration, time to reach peak concentration, and protein binding were unaffected. More importantly, there was no evidence of a pharmacodynamic interaction based on the prothrombin time profile. It was concluded that no clinically significant interaction occurs under these conditions.     

Effect of gemfibrozil on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of racemic warfarin in healthy subjects

AIMS: Case reports suggest that gemfobrozil can increase the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. Because gemfibrozil inhibits CYP2C9 in vitro, we studied its effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of racemic warfarin. METHODS: In a randomized cross-over study, 10 healthy subjects ingested 600 mg gemfibrozil or placebo twice daily for 8 days. On day 3, they were administered a single dose of 10 mg racemic R-S-warfarin orally. The concentrations of R- and S-warfarin in plasma and thromboplastin time were monitored up to 168 h. RESULTS: Gemfibrozil decreased the mean (+/-SD) area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC((0-infinity))] of S-warfarin by 11%, from 19.9 +/- 5.2 mg l(-1) h to 17.6 +/- 4.7 mg l(-1) h (95% CI on the difference -3.7, -0.78; P < 0.01) and that of R-warfarin by 6% from 31.3 +/- 7.5 mg l(-1) h during the gemfibrozil phase to 29.5 +/- 6.9 mg l(-1) h during the placebo phase (95% CI -3.3, -0.33; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the elimination half-lives of S- or R-warfarin between the phases. Gemfibrozil did not alter the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. CONCLUSION: Unexpectedly, gemfibrozil slightly decreased the plasma concentrations of R- and S-warfarin. Displacement of warfarin from plasma albumin by gemfibrozil or its interference with the absorption of warfarin could explain the present findings. Usual therapeutic doses of gemfibrozil seem to have limited effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single dose warfarin in healthy subjects.     

Effect of ginkgo and ginger on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two common herbal medicines, ginkgo and ginger, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin and the independent effect of these herbs on clotting status. METHODS: This was an open label, three-way crossover randomized study in 12 healthy male subjects, who received a single 25 mg dose of warfarin alone or after 7 days pretreatment with recommended doses of ginkgo or ginger from herbal medicine products of known quality. Dosing with ginkgo or ginger was continued for 7 days after administration of the warfarin dose. Platelet aggregation, international normalized ratio (INR) of prothrombin time, warfarin enantiomer protein binding, warfarin enantiomer concentrations in plasma and S-7-hydroxywarfarin concentration in urine were measured. Statistical comparisons were made using anova and the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the ratio of log transformed parameters are reported. RESULTS: INR and platelet aggregation were not affected by administration of ginkgo or ginger alone. The mean (95% CI) apparent clearances of S-warfarin after warfarin alone, with ginkgo or ginger were 189 (167-210) ml h(-1), 200 (173-227) ml h(-1) and 201 (171-231) ml h(-1), respectively. The respective apparent clearances of R-warfarin were 127 (106-149) ml h(-1), 126 (111-141) ml h(-1) and 131 (106-156) ml h(-1). The mean ratio (90% CI) of apparent clearance for S-warfarin was 1.05 (0.98-1.21) and for R-warfarin was 1.00 (0.93-1.08) when coadministered with ginkgo. The mean ratio (90% CI) of AUC(0-168) of INR was 0.93 (0.81-1.05) when coadministered with ginkgo. The mean ratio (90% CI) of apparent clearance for S-warfarin was 1.05 (0.97-1.13) and for R-warfarin was 1.02 (0.95-1.10) when coadministered with ginger. The mean ratio (90% CI) of AUC(0-168) of INR was 1.01 (0.93-1.15) when coadministered with ginger. The mean ratio (90% CI) for S-7-hydroxywarfarin urinary excretion rate was 1.07 (0.85-1.32) for ginkgo treatment, and 1.00 (0.81-1.23) for ginger coadministration suggesting these herbs did not affect CYP2C9 activity. Ginkgo and ginger did not affect the apparent volumes of distribution or protein binding of either S-warfarin or R-warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Ginkgo and ginger at recommended doses do not significantly affect clotting status, the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects.     

Effect of rosuvastatin on warfarin pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics

The effect of rosuvastatin on warfarin pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics was assessed in 2 trials. In trial A (a randomized, double-blind, 2-period crossover study), 18 healthy volunteers were given rosuvastatin 40 mg or placebo on demand (o.d.) for 10 days with 1 dose of warfarin 25 mg on day 7. In trial B (an open-label, 2-period study), 7 patients receiving warfarin therapy with stable international normalized ratio values between 2 and 3 were coadministered rosuvastatin 10 mg o.d. for up to 14 days, which increased to rosuvastatin 80 mg if the international normalized ratio values were <3 at the end of this period. The results indicated that rosuvastatin can enhance the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. The mechanism of this drug-drug interaction is unknown. Rosuvastatin had no effect on the total plasma concentrations of the warfarin enantiomers, but the free plasma fractions of the enantiomers were not measured. Appropriate monitoring of the international normalized ratio is indicated when this drug combination is coadministered.     

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy young adults

The population pharmacokinetics and pharmacological response — prothrombin complex activity and factor VII activity — were studied in a group of 48 normal, healthy young volunteers. Population parameter estimates were obtained using a standard two-stage method, a nonlinear mixed effect model (NONMEM) and a two-stage Bayesian method (EM algorithm). A modified sigmoid-Imax model was used to relate the concentration of s-warfarin to the rate of clotting factor synthesis. The three methods produced similar estimates of the population pharmacokinetic parameters, although the standard two-stage method overestimated the contribution of the pharmacokinetic parameters to the interindividual variability. It was not possible to partition the interindividual variability in response between the pharmacodynamic parameters with the NONMEM procedure: the estimates obtained from the EM algorithm were generally in good agreement with those obtained using the standard two-stage approach. The variability in the warfarin concentration contributed at most only 40% of the observed variability in the pharmacological response, and then only for times greater than 96 h after the dose. Most of the variability in the pharmacodynamics was due to interindividual differences in the clotting factor degradation rate constant and C_50,s, the s-warfarin concentration causing a 50% decrease in synthesis rate.     

Effects of fesoterodine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers

AIMS

To confirm the lack of an interaction of fesoterodine 8 mg with warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adults.

METHODS

In this open-label, two-treatment, crossover study, subjects (n = 14) aged 20–41 years with normal prothrombin time (PT) and International Normalized Ratio (INR) were randomized to receive a single dose of warfarin 25 mg alone in one period and fesoterodine 8 mg once daily on days 1–9 with a single dose of warfarin 25 mg co-administered on day 3 in the other period. There was a 10-day washout between treatments. Pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0,∞)), maximum plasma concentration (C_max), AUC from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0,last)), time to C_max (t_max), and half-life (t_1/2) for S- and R-warfarin. Pharmacodynamic endpoints were area under the INR-time curve (AUC_INR), maximum INR (INR_max), area under the PT-time curve (AUC_PT) and maximum PT (PT_max).

RESULTS

Across all pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparisons, the point estimates of treatment ratio (warfarin co-administered with fesoterodine vs. warfarin alone) were 92–100%. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the adjusted geometric means were contained within (80%, 125%). There were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory tests, vital signs or ECG recordings.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin 25 mg in healthy adults are unaffected by fesoterodine 8 mg. Concomitant administration of fesoterodine and warfarin was well tolerated.     

Effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin

Objective To examine the effect of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Aprepitant is a neurokinin-1 (NK₁)-receptor antagonist developed as an antiemetic for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.Methods This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-period, parallel-group study. During period 1, warfarin was individually titrated to a stable prothrombin time (expressed as international normalized ratio, INR) from 1.3 to 1.8. Subsequently, the daily warfarin dose remained fixed for 10–12 days. During period 2, the warfarin dose was continued for 8 days, and on days 1–3 administered concomitantly with aprepitant (125 mg on day 1, and 80 mg on days 2 and 3) or placebo. At baseline (day –1 of period 2) and on day 3, warfarin pharmacokinetics was investigated. INR was monitored daily. During period 2, warfarin trough concentrations were determined daily.Results The study was completed by 22 healthy volunteers (20 men, 2 women). On day 3, steady-state pharmacokinetics of warfarin enantiomers after aprepitant did not change, as assessed by warfarin AUC_0-24h and C_max. However, compared with placebo, trough S(–) warfarin concentrations decreased on days 5–8 (maximum decrease 34% on day 8, P<0.01). The INR decreased after aprepitant with a mean maximum decrease on day 8 of 11% versus placebo (P=0.011).Conclusion These data are consistent with a significant induction of CYP2C9 metabolism of S(–) warfarin by aprepitant. Subsequently, in patients on chronic warfarin therapy, the clotting status should be monitored closely during the 2-week period, particularly at 7–10 days, following initiation of the 3-day regimen of aprepitant with each chemotherapy cycle.     

Effect of St John's wort and ginseng on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects

M: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of St John's wort and ginseng on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. METHODS: This was an open-label, three-way crossover randomized study in 12 healthy male subjects, who received a single 25-mg dose of warfarin alone or after 14 days' pretreatment with St John's wort, or 7 days' pretreatment with ginseng. Dosing with St John's wort or ginseng was continued for 7 days after administration of the warfarin dose. Platelet aggregation, international normalized ratio (INR) of prothrombin time, warfarin enantiomer protein binding, warfarin enantiomer concentrations in plasma and S-7-hydroxywarfarin concentration in urine were measured. Statistical comparisons were made using anova and 90% confidence intervals are reported. RESULTS: INR and platelet aggregation were not affected by treatment with St John's wort or ginseng. The apparent clearances of S-warfarin after warfarin alone or with St John's wort or ginseng were, respectively, 198 +/- 38 ml h(-1), 270 +/- 44 ml h(-1) and 220 +/- 29 ml h(-1). The respective apparent clearances of R-warfarin were 110 +/- 25 ml h(-1), 142 +/- 29 ml h(-1) and 119 +/- 20 ml h(-1) [corrected]. The mean ratio and 90% confidence interval (CI) of apparent clearance for S-warfarin was 1.29 (1.16, 1.46) and for R-warfarin it was 1.23 (1.11, 1.37) when St John's wort was coadministered. The mean ratio and 90% CI of AUC(0-168) of INR was 0.79 (0.70, 0.95) when St John's wort was coadministered. St John's wort and ginseng did not affect the apparent volumes of distribution or protein binding of warfarin enantiomers. CONCLUSIONS: St John's wort significantly induced the apparent clearance of both S-warfarin and R-warfarin, which in turn resulted in a significant reduction in the pharmacological effect of rac-warfarin. Coadministration of warfarin with ginseng did not affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of either S-warfarin or R-warfarin.     

大豆异黄酮对华法林在人体内药动学和药效学的影响

目的:研究大豆异黄酮对华法林在人体内药动学和药效学的影响。方法:采用随机、单盲、双周期交叉、安慰剂对照试验设计。12名健康志愿者(男女各半)随机分为2组,连续5 wk每日分别服用大豆异黄酮胶囊(75 mg)或安慰剂1粒;d 29口服单剂量华法林5 mg;第2周期2组交叉服用安慰剂或大豆异黄酮胶囊,其余给药方案不变。按要求收集志愿者血样,分别以高效液相色谱(HPLC)法测定华法林的血药浓度以及半自动血凝仪测定常见凝血指标。结果:合用大豆异黄酮后,华法林的药动学参数c_(max)、AUC_(0～144)、AUC_(0～∞)、t_(1/2)显著增加(P<0.05),CL(F)显著域小(P<0.05),t_(max)和V_d(F)没有显著变化;华法林的药效学参数均无显著变化。单独服用大豆异黄酮4 wk后,凝血酶原时间(PT)和活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTF)无显著变化。结论:大豆异黄酮可影响华法林的药动学,但不影响华法林的药效学;单独服用大豆异黄酮4 wk对凝血功能无明显影响。     

The effect of warfarin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of napsagatran in healthy male volunteers

OBJECTIVE: The effect of oral warfarin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor napsagatran was investigated. METHODS: In an open, randomised, two-way crossover study, 12 healthy male volunteers were infused napsagatran (80 micrograms/min) for 48 h. Each subject was administered 25 mg warfarin (Coumadin) at the start of the infusion in either the first or second treatment period. Sampling was performed regularly over the treatment period and 24 h thereafter for measurement of plasma levels of napsagatran, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of napsagatran were not significantly influenced by co-administration of warfarin. Napsagatran administration was followed by increases in APTT and PT. Co-administration of warfarin increased the AUEC (area under the effect curve) calculated for the period 0-48 h (corrected for baseline) for APTT by 45% (95% CI: 28-65%) and for PT by 438% (95% CI: 272-678%) compared to the treatment with napsagatran alone. CONCLUSION: Warfarin has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of napsagatran, but has a marked influence on the pharmacodynamic parameters (APTT, PT) of napsagatran. In clinical practice, this interaction between the two compounds should be taken into account. The PT cannot be used to monitor the effect of oral anticoagulants during the switch from this group of direct thrombin inhibitors to full oral anticoagulant therapy.     

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in combination with ambrisentan in healthy volunteers

AIMS

Ambrisentan is an oral, propanoic acid-based endothelin receptor antagonist often co-administered with warfarin to patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential for ambrisentan to affect warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

METHODS

In this open-label cross-over study, 22 healthy subjects received a single dose of racemic warfarin 25 mg alone and after 8 days of ambrisentan 10 mg once daily. Assessments included exposure (AUC_0–last) and maximum plasma concentration (C_max) for R-and S-warfarin, and International Normalized Ratio maximum observed value (INR_max) and area under the curve (INR_{AUC(0–last)}). The effects of warfarin on ambrisentan steady-state pharmacokinetics and the safety of ambrisentan/warfarin co-administration were assessed. Data are presented as geometric mean ratios.

RESULTS

Ambrisentan had no significant effects on the AUC_0–last of R-warfarin [104.7; 90% confidence interval (CI) 101.7, 107.7) or S-warfarin (101.6; 90% CI 98.4, 105.0). Similarly, ambrisentan had no significant effects on the C_max of R-warfarin (91.6; 90% CI 86.2, 97.4) or S-warfarin (89.9; 90% CI 84.8, 95.3). Consistent with these observations, little pharmacodynamic change was observed for INR_max (85.3; 90% CI 82.4, 88.2) or INR_{AUC(0–last)} (93.0; 90% CI 90.8, 95.3). In addition, co-administration of warfarin did not alter ambrisentan steady-state pharmacokinetics. Adverse events were infrequent, and there were no bleeding adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple doses of ambrisentan had no clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of warfarin. Therefore, significant dose adjustments of either drug are unlikely to be required with co-administration.     

Effect of continuous subcutaneous treprostinil therapy on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin

Treprostinil sodium was recently approved in the United States for continuous subcutaneous infusion in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Anticoagulation with warfarin is recommended in PAH therapy. Given the likelihood for treprostinil and warfarin coadministration, a single-blind, controlled, crossover study was conducted to evaluate the effect of treprostinil infusion on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of warfarin. Area under the effect-time curve (AUEC(0-1)) and maximum effect over the entire sampling phase (E(max)) for warfarin INR were 219.58 and 2.071 with treprostinil and 218.93 and 2.041 with vehicle, respectively. Mean time to attain the peak concentration of R-enantiomer of warfarin (T(max)), half-life, and elimination rate constant (k(el)) were 1.9 hours, 51.688 hours, and 0.0137 per hour, respectively, in the presence of treprostinil and 1.5 hours, 52.579 hours, and 0.0137 per hour, respectively, in the presence of vehicle (control). Results were similar for the S-enantiomer. The 90% confidence intervals for warfarin INR and warfarin R- and S-enantiomer pharmacokinetic parameter (C(max) and AUC( infinity )) ratios were within 0.80-1.25, which was established as the no-effect criterion for treprostinil coadministration. No serious or severe adverse events, anticoagulation-related events, or clinically significant physical or laboratory findings were reported. These findings suggest that a clinically important interaction between treprostinil and warfarin during therapy is unlikely.     

Lack of a meaningful effect of anacetrapib on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects

AIM

Anacetrapib is currently being developed for the treatment of dyslipidaemia. Since warfarin, an anticoagulant with a narrow therapeutic index, is expected to be commonly prescribed in this population, a drug interaction study was conducted.

METHODS

In a randomized, open-label, two-period fixed-sequence design, 12 healthy male subjects received two different treatments (treatment A followed by treatment B). In treatment A, a single oral dose of 30 mg warfarin (3 × 10 mg Coumadin^TM) was administered on day 1. After a washout interval, subjects began treatment B, where they were given daily 100 mg doses of anacetrapib (1 × 100 mg) beginning on day −14 and continuing through day 7, with concomitant administration of 30 mg warfarin (3 × 10 mg) on day 1. All anacetrapib and warfarin doses were administered with a standard low fat breakfast. After warfarin concentrations and prothrombin time were measured, standard pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and statistical (linear mixed effects model) analyses were applied.

RESULTS

Anacetrapib was generally well tolerated when co-administered with warfarin in the healthy males in this study. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for warfarin + anacetrapib : warfarin alone and 90% confidence interval (CIs) for warfarin AUC_(0–∞) were 0.94 (0.90, 0.97) for the R(+) warfarin enantiomer and 0.93 (0.87, 0.98) for the S(−) warfarin enantiomer, both being contained in the interval (0.80, 1.25), supporting the primary hypothesis of the study. The GMRs warfarin + anacetrapib : warfarin alone and 90% CIs for the statistical comparison of warfarin C_max were 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) for both the R(+) warfarin and the S(−) warfarin enantiomers, and were also contained in the interval (0.80, 1.25). The GMR (warfarin + anacetrapib : warfarin alone) and 90% CI for the statistical comparison of INR AUC_{(0–168 h)} was 0.93 (0.89, 0.96).

CONCLUSION

The single dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of orally administered warfarin were not meaningfully affected by multiple dose administration of anacetrapib, indicating that anacetrapib does not affect CYP 2C9 clinically. Thus, no dosage adjustment for warfarin is necessary when co-administered with anacetrapib.     

Effect of the oral renin inhibitor aliskiren on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of warfarin in healthy subjects

AIMS: To investigate the effects of aliskiren, an oral renin inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. METHODS: In a single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-period crossover study, 15 healthy male and female subjects received a single oral dose of 25 mg racemic warfarin twice, once in the morning of the 8th day of treatment with 150 mg aliskiren and once at the same time point during treatment with placebo. Blood samples were collected for the measurement of prothrombin time (PT) and activated thromboplastin time (aPTT) and for determination of plasma concentrations of (R)- and (S)-warfarin. RESULTS: Aliskiren treatment had no effect on the blood coagulation parameters (PT, INR and aPTT). The ratios of least square means (90% CI) of pharmacokinetic parameters in the presence and absence of aliskiren for (R)- and (S)-warfarin were Cmax 0.89 (0.82, 0.96) and 0.88 (0.80, 0.97), AUC(0, infinity) 1.00 (0.94, 1.07) and 1.06 (0.96, 1.16) and t(1/2) 0.99 (0.92, 1.07) and 1.05 (0.96, 1.14). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple doses of aliskiren had no detectable effect on the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of a single dose of warfarin in healthy subjects.