Estimating Medicare Part D's impact on medication access among dually eligible beneficiaries with mental disorders

OBJECTIVE: Medicare drug benefit (Part D) plans may restrict psychotropic medications more than state Medicaid programs do. This may have important implications for patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid whose medications previously were covered under Medicaid. The objective of this study was to estimate rates of medication switching among dually eligible beneficiaries using antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers attributable to their enrollment in Medicare drug plans. METHODS: Baseline data on medication usage patterns among 467 dually eligible beneficiaries with mental disorders from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, formulary data from a sample of Medicare drug plans, and estimates of the utilization response to pharmacy management tools from the Medicaid literature were used to estimate the likelihood of switching medications conditional on use of drugs and assignment to particular Medicare drug plans. RESULTS: Restrictions on psychotropic medications were common among the drug plans studied. Estimated rates of medication switching attributable to Medicare Part D were 6%-10% among dually eligible beneficiaries using antipsychotics, 5%-7% among those using antidepressants, and 2%-4% among those using mood stabilizers. Switching rates varied substantially across plans. CONCLUSIONS: On average, relatively few dually eligible beneficiaries with mental disorders are likely to experience treatment disruptions because of formulary restrictions and utilization controls used by Medicare drug plans. However, beneficiaries in some plans will experience significant barriers to medication access. Given the substantial variation among Medicare drug plans' management of psychotropic medication use, clinicians and social service agencies should counsel their beneficiaries with mental disorders in navigating the complex Medicare drug plan market.     

Patterns of adult psychotherapy in psychiatric practice

OBJECTIVE: Psychotherapy has long been recognized as a key component of psychiatric care. However, concerns have been raised about access to psychotherapy as a result of changes in the financing and management of care. This study examined patterns and predictors of receipt of psychotherapy among patients of psychiatrists. METHODS: Data were collected for 587 psychiatrists who participated in the American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education's Practice Research Network 1999 Study of Psychiatric Patients and Treatments, which generated nationally representative data for 1,589 adult patients. RESULTS: Findings indicate that more than 66 percent of patients of psychiatrists received some form of psychotherapy from the psychiatrist or another provider in the past 30 days--56 percent from their psychiatrist and 10 percent from another clinician. Although 72 percent of patients with depression received psychotherapy, more than half of those with schizophrenia did not. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients of psychiatrists received psychotherapy from their psychiatrist. However, these rates varied by demographic, diagnostic, and health plan characteristics and by practice setting. Further research determining if these observed patterns of psychotherapy are related to differential outcomes is needed.     

Characteristics and service use patterns of nonelderly medicare beneficiaries with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to describe the characteristics of nonelderly Medicare beneficiaries who have a diagnosis of schizophrenia and to assess the impact of Medicare financing on service quality by comparing service use among individuals who were enrolled only in Medicare and those who were enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid. The authors hypothesized that persons who received only Medicare benefits would use proportionally fewer psychosocial services and less antipsychotic medication than individuals who were dually enrolled. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS). The study sample consisted of 257 individuals younger than age 65 who were included in the 1995 MCBS sample and who had one inpatient or two outpatient claims for schizophrenia between 1992 and 1996. The variables examined were demographic characteristics, comorbid psychiatric and substance use disorders, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, self-reported use of prescribed antipsychotic medication, and claims for psychosocial services. A multivariate analysis was also conducted to predict the use of antipsychotic medication from demographic and health status variables. RESULTS: Dually enrolled beneficiaries were significantly more likely to be receiving antipsychotic medication than Medicare-only beneficiaries, even when the analysis controlled for demographic characteristics, health status, and comorbidity. No significant differences were found in the use of psychosocial services. CONCLUSIONS: The findings were consistent with the hypothesis that Medicare financing, which restricts access to many mental health services, is not conducive to good community care for persons with schizophrenia.     

Role of a medical staff coding committee in documentation,coding, and billing compliance

Physician documentation, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding, and compliance with federal billing regulations are essential given the government's significant efforts to address fraud and abuse and the grave financial and legal consequences of noncompliance. Because Medicare guidelines do not focus substantially on psychiatric care, compliance is especially challenging for psychiatrists and psychiatric centers. Four years ago, the University of Texas-Harris County Psychiatric Center formed a medical staff coding committee to assist the center and its psychiatrists in dealing with compliance issues. The committee has evolved into a highly effective and important component of the institution's overall compliance program. The authors discuss the origins, development, and accomplishments of the medical staff coding committee.     

Book Reviews

Despite caregivers' impact on suicidal patients' compliance with treatment and suicide prevention, little is known about mental-health professionals' perceptions of work with suicidal patients. The roles of psychiatric staff's training and supervision in the care of suicidal patients were investigated by means of a postal questionnaire sent to a random sample of 1543 psychiatric staff members. The response rates were 71% for psychiatrists and 57% for nurses and assistant nurses. The responses of 53 psychiatrists, 164 nurses and 333 assistant nurses working with suicidal patients on a regular basis were compared and analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Thirty-five per cent of the assistant nurses, 43% of the nurses and 74% of the psychiatrists who worked with suicidal patients on a regular basis perceived that they were sufficiently trained for this work, while 75% of the assistant nurses, 72% of the nurses and 34% of the psychiatrists received supervision in their work with suicidal patients. In spite of receiving supervision, nursing staff who perceived that they lacked training reported uncertainties in their work with suicidal patients to a larger extent than those who perceived that their training was sufficient. Uncertainties were significantly more prevalent among nursing staff than among psychiatrists. Basic and specific training in suicidology is needed and cannot be replaced solely by supervision, since psychiatric staff often have to deal with suicidal patients in emergency situations and must be able to rely on their own skills.     

The roles of knowledge and supervision in work with suicidal patients

Despite caregivers' impact on suicidal patients' compliance with treatment and suicide prevention, little is known about mental-health professionals' perceptions of work with suicidal patients. The roles of psychiatric staff's training and supervision in the care of suicidal patients were investigated by means of a postal questionnaire sent to a random sample of 1543 psychiatric staff members. The response rates were 71% for psychiatrists and 57% for nurses and assistant nurses. The responses of 53 psychiatrists, 164 nurses and 333 assistant nurses working with suicidal patients on a regular basis were compared and analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Thirty-five per cent of the assistant nurses, 43% of the nurses and 74% of the psychiatrists who worked with suicidal patients on a regular basis perceived that they were sufficiently trained for this work, while 75% of the assistant nurses, 72% of the nurses and 34% of the psychiatrists received supervision in their work with suicidal patients. In spite of receiving supervision, nursing staff who perceived that they lacked training reported uncertainties in their work with suicidal patients to a larger extent than those who perceived that their training was sufficient. Uncertainties were significantly more prevalent among nursing staff than among psychiatrists. Basic and specific training in suicidology is needed and cannot be replaced solely by supervision, since psychiatric staff often have to deal with suicidal patients in emergency situations and must be able to rely on their own skills.     

Guideline recommendations for treatment of schizophrenia: the impact of managed care

BACKGROUND: Medicaid-managed care has been shown to reduce the number and length of psychiatric hospitalizations, but little is known about the clinical and social consequences of such managed care programs. The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment of schizophrenia for disabled Medicaid beneficiaries who were and were not enrolled in managed care. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of patients who sought care for a psychiatric crisis from June 7, 1997, to May 13, 1999. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Inpatient and outpatient mental health facilities in Massachusetts were studied. The participants included 420 adult Medicaid beneficiaries, aged 24 to 64 years, who were treated for schizophrenia; 784 eligible beneficiaries were originally contacted and invited to participate (53.6% response). A private managed behavioral health care organization administered the Medicaid mental health benefit for about half the patients in the study. The other half were enrolled in the dually insured fee-for-service Medicare/Medicaid plan. The main outcome measures were adherence to the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team treatment recommendations from inpatient and outpatient medical records, self-reported quality of interpersonal interactions between patient and clinician, self-reported care experiences and outcomes, and clinician-reported outcomes. RESULTS: There were no differences between the managed care plan and the unmanaged fee-for-service plan in adherence to the schizophrenia treatment guidelines. However, much outpatient care in both programs was inconsistent with treatment guidelines. Inpatient treatment was far more likely to conform to guidelines than outpatient treatment. Patient ratings of their care were positive and not different between plans. Clinical outcome and health-related quality of life were not different between plans. CONCLUSIONS: A major change in Massachusetts in the way mental health care is organized and financed had neither a negative nor a positive effect on care quality. However, adherence to nationally accepted guidelines for care was only modest, suggesting a need to improve the delivery of treatment to the most disabled highest-risk adults with schizophrenia.     

A preliminary study of staff perception of psychiatric services in general hospitals

There has been increasing recognition of the importance of integrating physical and psychiatric care under growing economic pressure. We conducted a survey of staff perception on psychiatric services in four general hospitals. The purpose of this study was to see differences among the staff in their recognition and expectation of the role of the psychiatric department and the need for psychiatric and other staff to work more closely together. Although 81% of psychiatrists recognized their role in acute psychiatry, only 42.6% thought that acute psychiatry was the most important role of psychiatry. Mood disorders were recognized as a psychiatric category in 95.2% of psychiatrists and 54.8% of nonpsychiatrist physicians. Overall satisfaction with psychiatric services in psychiatric and other staff were 54.0% and 68.2%, respectively. Although 85.7% of psychiatrists answered that they supported staff in other departments that have psychiatric or psychological problems, only 53.5% of those staff in other departments were satisfied with their support. Staff in other departments expected psychiatric staff to establish consultation hotlines and to visit other departments regularly. Our results suggest that there are discrepancies between psychiatric and other staff in their perception of psychiatric services, and it is our belief that those gaps must be bridged for better collaboration in general hospitals.     

A Crisis of Credibility: Professionals’ Concerns about the Psychiatric Care Provided to Clients of the Child Welfare System

Objectives This study examined child welfare and mental health professionals’ views of the quality of psychiatric services received by consumers of the child welfare system and explored root causes of perceived quality problems. Methods One hundred and thirty child welfare, mental health and court professionals participated in qualitative interviews individually or in groups. Data analyses identified perceived problems in quality and perceived causes of quality problems. Participants in member checking groups were then asked to comment on and further clarify the results. Results The participants reported concerns related to overuse of psychotropic medication, overmedicated children, short inpatient stays, and continuity of psychiatric care. Overuse of psychotropic medications and overmedication were perceived to be driven by short evaluations, liability concerns, short inpatient stays and a lack of clinical feedback to psychiatrists from child welfare partners. Medicaid reimbursement policies were at the heart of several quality concerns. These problems contributed to a distrust of psychiatric practices among child welfare professionals. Conclusions These findings underscore the adverse effects of modern marketplace medicine coupled with low Medicaid reimbursement rates on quality of care for vulnerable groups. Child welfare and mental health professionals and their associated stakeholders may together possess substantial clout to advocate for a reimbursement system and structure that promotes quality service. The findings also point to a crisis of credibility toward psychiatric practice among social service and other non-psychiatrist mental health professionals. Efforts are needed to increase the capacity for psychiatrists and child welfare professionals to communicate effectively with each other and for psychiatrists to receive the information that they need from their child welfare partners to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.     

The long road home: rebuilding public inpatient psychiatric services in post-Katrina New Orleans

In August 2006, a year after Hurricane Katrina, the first acute inpatient public psychiatric unit for adults was opened in New Orleans to serve patients referred from local emergency departments. This article describes the clinical and administrative experiences of providing inpatient care in post-Katrina New Orleans, including the increased demand for programs to treat patients with co-occurring disorders, the expanded scope of practice for psychiatrists to include primary care, and ongoing staff shortages in a traumatized and displaced workforce. Lessons learned in regard to disaster planning and recovery are also discussed.     

Psychiatric treatment in primary care patients with anxiety disorders: a comparison of care received from primary care providers and psychiatrists

OBJECTIVE: This study examined psychiatric treatment received by primary care patients with anxiety disorders and compared treatment received from primary care physicians and from psychiatrists. METHOD: Primary care patients at 15 sites were screened for anxiety symptoms. Those screening positive were interviewed to assess for anxiety disorders. Information on psychiatric treatment received and provider of pharmacological treatment were collected. RESULTS: Of 539 primary care participants with at least one anxiety disorder, almost half (47.3%) were untreated. Nearly 21% were receiving medication only for psychiatric problems, 7.2% were receiving psychotherapy alone, and 24.5% were receiving both medication and psychotherapy. Patients receiving psychopharmacological treatment received similar medications, often at similar dosages, regardless of whether their prescriber was a primary care physician or a psychiatrist. One exception was that patients were less likely to be taking benzodiazepines if their provider was a primary care physician. Those receiving medications from a primary care provider were also less likely to be receiving psychotherapy. Overall, patients with more functional impairment, more severe symptoms, and comorbid major depression were more likely to receive mental health treatment. Members of racial/ethnic minority groups were less likely to be treated. Frequently endorsed reasons for not receiving pharmacological treatment were that the primary care physician did not recommend it and the patient did not believe in taking medication for emotional problems. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half the primary care patients with anxiety disorders were not treated. However, when they were treated, the care received from primary care physicians and psychiatrists was relatively similar.     

Are we training too many psychiatrists?

In contrast to the past decade's concerns about an undersupply of psychiatric manpower, the authors point out that the profession may soon be facing the prospect of an oversupply of psychiatrists. Given the present rate of producing psychiatrists, shifts in demands for psychiatric services, changing payment and access patterns regarding specialty medical care, increasing numbers of nonpsychiatrist mental health professionals, and a probable surfeit of primary care physicians, underemployment of psychiatrists may become commonplace. Future psychiatrists will likely be used more as consultants, and the profession will need fewer, but better trained, graduates. The authors present alternative proposals to deal with service needs related to such reductions.     

Preparing to implement medication algorithms: staff perspectives and system infrastructure

To assess the readiness of mental health facilities in Oregon to implement medication algorithms using the Medication Management Approaches in Psychiatry toolkit (MedMAP) developed by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), researchers conducted interviews with 68 clinical and administrative employees of four inpatient and four outpatient mental health facilities in Oregon. Respondents had generally positive opinions about the algorithms, but they also expressed many concerns about logistics and implementation, chiefly related to medication selection and expected restrictions on choices for prescribing providers and patients. In implementing medication algorithms, it may be beneficial to assess staff perspectives as well as the capabilities of the program's infrastructure. The extent to which staff concerns, values, and needs are anticipated and promptly and responsively addressed is likely have a major influence on successful implementation.     

Cigarette smoking in psychiatric settings: occupational health, safety, welfare and legal concerns

OBJECTIVE: In the current climate of growing concern for the harmful effects of cigarette smoking and passive smoking, the high prevalence of this activity within psychiatric settings can no longer be ignored. This paper reviews the findings of research in a public stand-alone psychiatric facility in South Australia where significant legal and occupational health, safety and welfare (OHSW) concerns were apparent for both patients and staff as a consequence of the strong culture of smoking in that setting. The aim of this paper is to raise awareness of this significant health and legal issue and to inform policy and practice change. METHOD: This paper reviews legal issues associated with smoking in psychiatric settings and presents relevant findings from previous studies in which in-depth interviews and observations in community and inpatient psychiatric settings were conducted. RESULTS: Significant legal and OHSW concerns were apparent for both patients and staff in all settings. The potential for future litigation was high. CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of legal and OHSW implications of continued smoking by staff and patients within mental health settings. Several administrative, clinical and cultural practices need to change within this system of care in order to improve overall patient wellbeing and to avoid the potential for litigation by patients and staff.     

AIDS: clinical and ethical issues on a psychiatric unit

Using a case illustration, this paper describes how AIDS has affected psychiatric practice on an inpatient unit. The clinical, ethical and administrative issues are discussed from a multi-disciplinary perspective. The issues are discussed as 1. clinical issues (diagnostic and management), 2. effects on ward milieu, 3. staff issues, 4. family counselling and discharge planning and 5. administrative issues. It is important for inpatient staff to discuss these issues and develop clinical guidelines and administrative procedures that will help staff provide the highest level of care possible. Because every patient is potentially an HIV carrier, many of the solutions developed around AIDS related concerns should apply to all patients on a psychiatric ward.     

Challenges in developing an inpatient psychiatric program for patients with AIDS and ARC

The presence of patients with AIDS and AIDS-related complex (ARC) on a psychiatric unit requires education of and adaptation by staff and other patients as well as changes in the psychiatric milieu. The authors describe their experiences with 36 AIDS and ARC patients admitted to a psychiatric unit over an 18-month period. They address issues related to staff reactions to terminal illness and to increased demands to provide physical care, milieu management that takes into account the limitations of AIDS patients suffering from dementia, diagnostic complications arising from mixed psychopathology in some AIDS patients, and the increased susceptibility of AIDS patients to side effects and toxicity from psychotropic medication. Other issues relating to infection control, ethical concerns, needs of friends and family, and disposition planning are also discussed.