共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Tominaga T Kimura M Asaga T Yoshida M Awane H Koyama H Takatsuka Y Mitsuyama S Ikeda T Ogita M Aoyama H Sano M Abe R Nishi T Wada T Danno M Toi M Takashima S 《Oncology reports》2004,12(4):797-803
We studied the usefulness of the oral 5-FU anti-cancer drug 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU) + cyclophosphamide (CPM) + tamoxifen (TAM) (HCT group) in comparison with CMF + TAM (CMFT group) in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer by a non-inferiority study based on a multi-institutional joint study. Clinical stage I, II primary breast cancers with histologically positive axillary lymph node metastasis were randomly assigned to the HCT group or the CMFT group after primary surgery. We registered 136 cases (HCT group 68 cases, CMFT group 68 cases). No significant difference in the 5-year overall survival rate (OS) and the 5-year disease-free survival rate (DFS) was found between the two groups. In the stratified analysis, DFS in cases in which the number of metastatic lymph nodes was 1-3 was significantly better in the HCT group (HCT group 84.3%, CMFT group 69.4%, log-rank test p=0.0496). No significant difference in the total incidence of adverse effects was found between the two groups, but there were significantly less adverse effects of grade 2 or over in the HCT group (p=0.034). The QOL survey at 3 months after surgery showed a significant decline of the QOL regarding lassitude, degree of difficulty in daily life, satisfaction with treatment and present mood in the CMFT group. Study results suggest that 2-year HCT therapy including the oral 5-FU anti-cancer drug HCFU is a useful adjuvant therapy which can replace CMFT therapy in early breast cancer cases with 3 or lower metastatic lymph nodes. 相似文献
2.
Koizumi W Fukuyama Y Fukuda T Akiya T Hasegawa K Kojima Y Ohno N Kurihara M 《Anticancer research》2004,24(4):2465-2470
Various chemotherapies have been used to treat inoperable gastric cancer. Most combination therapies include cisplatin (CDDP) and fluoropyrimidine (5-FUs), which are thought of as key drugs. In the present study, we randomly compared mitomycin (MMC) and CDDP plus doxifluridine (5'-DFUR), which is an oral 5-FU and an intermediate metabolite of capecitabine (Xeloda), with CDDP plus 5'-DFUR in advanced unresectable gastric cancer. Regimen A was CDDP (70 mg/m2, by 2-hour intravenous drip infusion on day 1), MMC (7 mg/m2, injected intravenously on day 2), and oral 5'-DFUR (1200 mg/m2, on days 4 to 7, 11 to 14, 18 to 21 and 25 to 28; 3 days rest and 4 days administration). Regimen B was identical to regimen A without MMC. RESULTS: The response rate was 25.0% (8/32 patients) in Regimen A, 17.2% (5/29) in Regimen B (p=0.541). The median survival time was 241 days in Regimen A and 179 days in Regimen B (p=0.498). In Regimen A, although no significant difference was observed, end points such as response rate and suvival improved. Thus, we concluded that a randomized controlled phase III study with more subjects should be conducted. 相似文献
3.
4.
《Annals of oncology》2010,21(1):48-54
BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine combinations as front-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer (ABC).Patients and MethodsPreviously untreated patients with ABC were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus epirubicin 75 mg/m2 (DE) on day 1 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 plus capecitabine 950 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1–14 (DC) in 21-day cycles. Previous anthracycline-based (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if completed >1 year before enrollment. The primary objective of the study was to compare time to disease progression (TTP).ResultsOne hundred and thirty-six women were treated on each arm and median TTP was 10.6 versus 11.0 months (P = 0.7), for DE and DC, respectively. According to RECIST criteria we observed 15 (11%) versus 11 (8%) complete responses and 55 (40%) versus 61 (45%) partial responses (P = 0.8), with DE and DC, respectively. Severe toxicity included grade 3–4 neutropenia (57% versus 46%; P = 0.07), febrile neutropenia (11% versus 8%; P = 0.4), hand–foot syndrome (0% versus 4%; P = 0.02), grade 2–3 anemia (20% versus 7%; P = 0.001) and asthenia (12% versus 6%; P = 0.09) with DE and DC, respectively.ConclusionsThe DE and DC regimens have similar efficacy but different toxicity. Either regimen can be used as front-line treatment of ABC. 相似文献
5.
M J Piccart A Di Leo M Beauduin A Vindevoghel J Michel C Focan A Tagnon F Ries P Gobert C Finet M T Closon-Dejardin J P Dufrane J Kerger F Liebens S Beauvois S Bartholomeus S Dolci J P Lobelle M Paesmans J M Nogaret 《Journal of clinical oncology》2001,19(12):3103-3110
PURPOSE: To compare a full-dose epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (HEC) regimen with classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) therapy and with a moderate-dose epirubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen (EC) in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Node-positive breast cancer patients who were aged 70 years or younger were randomly allocated to one of the following treatments: CMF for six cycles (oral cyclophosphamide); EC for eight cycles (epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2); day 1 every 3 weeks); and HEC for eight cycles (epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 830 mg/m(2); day 1 every 3 weeks). RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-five, 267, and 255 eligible patients were treated with CMF, EC, and HEC, respectively. Patient characteristics were well balanced among the three arms. One and three cases of congestive heart failure were reported in the EC and HEC arms, respectively. Three cases of acute myeloid leukemia were reported in the HEC arm. After 4 years of median follow-up, no statistically significant differences were observed between HEC and CMF (event-free survival [EFS]: hazards ratio [HR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.31, P =.80; distant-EFS: HR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.34, P =.87; overall survival [OS]: HR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.44, P =.87). HEC is more effective than EC (EFS: HR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.99, P =.04; distant-EFS: HR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02, P =.06; OS HR = 0.69, 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.00, P =.05). CONCLUSION: This three-arm study does not show an advantage in favor of an adequately dosed epirubicin-based regimen over classical CMF in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive pre- and postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Moreover, this study confirms that there is a dose-response curve for epirubicin in breast cancer adjuvant therapy. 相似文献
6.
John H. Glick M.D. Richard H. Creech M.D. Susan Torri R.N. Christopher Holroyde M.D. Harvey Brodovsky M.D. Robert B. Catalano Pharm.D. Michael Varano Ph.D. 《Breast cancer research and treatment》1981,1(1):59-68
Summary Eighty-eight postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, in whom estrogen receptors (ER) were positive or unknown, were treated on a controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of tamoxifen and to assess the therapeutic advantage of sequentially adding low-dose cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy in tamoxifen responders. Patients with known ER negative status were not studied. After the initial 12-week treatment with tamoxifen alone, 60% of ER positive patients achieved complete or partial response as did 35% in whom ER were unknown. Response status further improved in 18% randomized to continue tamoxifen alone vs 31% in whom CMF was added to tamoxifen. There were no statistically significant differences in time to the development of progressive disease or survival between the ER positive and ER unknown patients or between the tamoxifen and tamoxifen plus CMF groups. We conclude that inability to determine ER status should not prejudice against the use of tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. No benefit has been demonstrated from the addition of CMF chemotherapy in tamoxifen responders.
Address for reprints: J.H. Glick, M.D., Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. 相似文献
7.
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with oral doxifluridine plus low-dose oral leucovorin in unresectable primary rectal cancer 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Seong J Cho JH Kim NK Min JS Suh CO 《International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics》2001,50(2):435-439
PURPOSE: The use of oral chemotherapeutic agents in chemoradiotherapy provides several advantages. Doxifluridine, an oral 5-FU prodrug, has been shown to be effective in colorectal cancer. We attempted a Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with doxifluridine plus a low-dose oral leucovorin in unresectable primary rectal cancer patients. In this study, toxicity and efficacy were evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: There were 23 patients with primary unresectable rectal cancer in this trial, 21 of whom were available for analysis. The patients were treated with oral doxifluridine (900 mg/day) plus oral leucovorin (30 mg/day) from days 1 to 35, and pelvic radiation of 45 Gy over 5 weeks. Surgical resection was performed 5-6 weeks after the treatment. RESULTS: Acute toxicity involved thrombocytopenia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and skin reaction. All were in Grade 1/2, except diarrhea, which was not only the most frequent (7 patients, 33.3%), but also the only toxicity of Grade 3 (2 patients). The clinical tumor response was shown in 5 patients (23.8%) as a complete response and 13 patients (61.9%) as a partial response. A complete resection with negative resection margin was done in 18 patients (85.7%), in 2 of whom a pathologic complete response was shown (9.5%). The overall downstaging rate in the T- and N-stage groupings was 71.4% (15 patients). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the efficacy and low toxicity of chemoradiotherapy with doxifluridine. Currently, a Phase III randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy is ongoing at our institute to compare the therapeutic efficacy of oral 5-FU with respect to i.v. 5-FU in locally advanced and unresectable rectal cancer. 相似文献
8.
J N Ingle L K Everson H S Wieand S A Cullinan L E Wold J B Hagen J K Martin J E Krook R G Fitzgibbons J F Foley 《Cancer》1989,63(7):1257-1264
A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if the addition of hormonal therapy with tamoxifen to a combination chemotherapy regimen was superior to the chemotherapy alone for adjuvant treatment of premenopausal women after mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer. The chemotherapy regimen utilized consisted of cyclophosphamide (C), 5-fluorouracil (F), and prednisone (P), and the doses employed were: C, 150 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 5; F, 300 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 5; and P, 10 mg orally three times daily on days 1 to 7. A total of ten courses of therapy, given every 6 weeks, was planned. Tamoxifen (T) was given at a dose of 10 mg twice daily and was stopped 6 weeks after the last course of CFP. Four hundred patients are fully eligible and evaluable. With a median observation time of 5.3 years, the proportion of recurrences on each arm were: CFP, 95 of 202 (47%); CFPT, 77 of 198 (39%). The relapse-free survival distribution for CFPT was superior to that for CFP, at a borderline level of significance (two-sided P = 0.06). When significant prognostic factors were considered in covariate analysis, CFPT was not significantly better than CFP (P = 0.43). This marked change in level was due to imbalance in several factors not considered in stratification. Currently, 31% of CFP and 25% of CFPT patients have died, and although there is a slight separation of the survival curves in favor of CFPT, the difference is not significant (P = 0.21). Analysis within receptor subsets also showed no significant advantage for the addition of tamoxifen. This study does not establish a significant advantage for the concurrent administration of tamoxifen with the CFP regimen. It does, however, clearly demonstrate the importance of examination of clinically important prognostic factors, even those not utilized in stratification, and consideration of these factors in covariate analysis if imbalances are present. 相似文献
9.
Mark N Levine Kathleen I Pritchard Vivien H C Bramwell Lois E Shepherd Dongsheng Tu Nancy Paul 《Journal of clinical oncology》2005,23(22):5166-5170
PURPOSE: Certain anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens are associated with improved relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with the classic regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in women with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 1993, 710 pre- and perimenopausal women with axillary node-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either cyclophosphamide 75 mg/m(2) orally days 1 through 14, epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 and 8, and fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 and 8 (CEF) or CMF (cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m(2) orally days 1 through 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 and 8, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1 and 8). On the basis of follow-up to May 1997 (median follow-up time, 59 months), there was a statistically significant improvement in RFS and OS for CEF compared with CMF. RESULTS: The trial results are now updated, with a median follow-up of 10 years for live patients. The 10-year RFS is 52% for patients who received CEF compared with 45% for CMF patients (hazard ratio [HR] for CMF v CEF = 1.31; stratified log-rank, P = .007). The 10-year OS for patients who received CEF and CMF are 62% and 58%, respectively (HR for CMF v CEF = 1.18; stratified log-rank, P = .085). The rates of acute leukemia have not changed since the original report, whereas the rates of congestive heart failure are slightly higher but acceptable (four patients [1.1%] in the CEF group v one patient [0.3%] in the CMF group). CONCLUSION: The previously demonstrated benefit of CEF compared with CMF adjuvant chemotherapy is maintained with longer follow-up in the MA5 trial. 相似文献
10.
Morihiko Kimura Takeshi Tominaga Yuichi Takatsuka Masakazu Toi Rikiya Abe Hiroki Koyama Shigemitsu Takashima Yasuo Nomura Shigeto Miura Izo Kimijima Hideya Tashiro Yasuo Ohashi 《Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)》2010,17(3):190-198
Background
To compare the cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy and the anthracycline-containing regimen cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the latter.Methods
A total of 294 patients with axillary node-positive primary breast cancer of STAGE I–IIIa were randomly assigned to either CEF [cyclophosphamide (CPA) 500 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8; epirubicin (EPI) 60 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8] or CMF [CPA 500 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8; methotrexate (MTX) 40 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8; and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8]. Both treatment regimens were comprised of six cycles at 4-week intervals. Tamoxifen (TAM) 20 mg/day was concomitantly given to estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients and those with undetermined ER status for 2 years.Results
The overall 5-year survival was 77.1% for CEF and 71.4% for CMF [p = 0.24; hazard ratio 0.79 (95% CI 0.50–1.24)], and the 5-year disease-free survival was 55.7% for CEF and 48.9% for CMF [p = 0.15; hazard ratio 0.80 (95% CI 0.57–1.12)]. Although the log-rank test did not show a significant difference, both overall and disease-free survivals were higher for CEF according to the point estimates. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred more frequently in CEF.Conclusion
Whereas CEF had a good trend compare with CMF, it could not be proven statistically significant. The principal cause of the failure seems to be insufficient power, that is, the dose intensity (EPI: 60 mg/m2) set 10 years ago, when the trial began, was low, and the number of trial subjects was small because of the background of the times, which made the accumulation of cases extremely difficult. However, the trial should be considered to be meaningful, as it was the first, formally conducted controlled trial on chemotherapy in Japan. 相似文献11.
J N Ingle L K Everson H S Wieand J K Martin H J Votava L E Wold J E Krook S A Cullinan J K Paulsen D I Twito 《Journal of clinical oncology》1988,6(9):1388-1396
Following mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer, 261 postmenopausal women were randomized to observation or adjuvant treatment with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, prednisone (CFP) alone or combined with tamoxifen (T). Doses used were: C, 150 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 to 5; F, 300 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 5; P, 10 mg by mouth 3 times daily on days 1 to 7; and T, 10 mg by mouth 2 times daily. A total of ten courses of treatment, administered every 6 weeks, was planned and T was stopped 6 weeks after the last course of CFP. Two hundred thirty-four patients were fully eligible and evaluable. With a median observation time slightly in excess of 5 years, the proportion of recurrences on each arm were: CFP, 29 of 75 (39%); CFPT, 29 of 71 (41%); and observation, 50 of 88 (57%). Relapse-free survival distributions for both CFP and CFPT were superior to observation (both two-sided P = .01). Considering prognostic factors in covariate analysis revealed two-sided P = .0006 for CFP v observation and P = .0003 for CFPT v observation. No substantial difference was identified between CFP and CFPT. Survival data are not yet mature with 31% dead; and, although slight separations of the curves exist in favor of the treatment arms, no significant differences in survival have been seen. Both adjuvant therapy programs are well tolerated and there were no treatment-related deaths. Further maturation of the data is required to determine if the advantages in relapse-free survival will be translated into any overall survival benefit which must be considered the goal of primary interest. 相似文献
12.
Colleoni M Dibartolomeo M Bajetta E Nole F Nelli P Carnaghi C Vicario G Delvecchio M Bono A 《Oncology reports》1995,2(4):603-606
Systemic chemotherapy with currently available agents in unresectable HCC has a minimal impact on disease progression and a predictable response rate of <20%. Doxifluridine (5 deoxy-5-fluorouridine, dFUR) is a new fluropyrimidine derivative that demonstrated higher antitumoral activity than other fluoropyrimidines in murine tumors and optimal gastrointestinal absorption when administered orally. Therefore, we evaluated the activity and feasibility of a combination of dFUR and l-leucovorin in unresectable HCC by the following schedule: l-leucovorin 25 mg orally followed 2 hours later by dFUR 1,200 mg/m(2), day 1 through 5, cycles being repeated every 10 days. Thirtyseven patients with unresectable HCC entered the study and are evaluable for response and toxicity. Three partial responses have been observed, to a global response rate of 8% (95% confidence interval 2-22%). After a median observation time of 12 months, the median survival was 7 months, with a median time to progression of 4 months; Main toxicity was diarrhea; severe in 30% of the patients. One patient died as a result of uncontrollable diarrhea. In view of the limited activity observed, further trials with this schedule are not warranted. 相似文献
13.
J N Ingle S J Green D L Ahmann H J Long J H Edmonson J Rubin M N Chang E T Creagan 《Journal of clinical oncology》1986,4(6):958-964
A randomized clinical trial was performed to compare the efficacy of tamoxifen (TAM) alone with that of TAM plus aminoglutethimide (AG) and hydrocortisone (HC). Patients failing TAM could receive AG and HC. Objective responses to therapy were seen in 21 of 49 TAM patients (43%) and 25 of 51 TAM, AG and HC patients (49%). Time to disease progression and survival distributions were not significantly different between the treatment arms. Toxicity was greater for patients treated with TAM, AG, and HC and the trial was discontinued early for this reason. Twenty-four patients received AG and HC after TAM therapy and three (12%) achieved a response. We conclude that the combination of TAM, AG, and HC is not recommended over TAM alone because toxicity appears to outweigh any potential therapeutic advantage. 相似文献
14.
J N Ingle D I Twito D J Schaid S A Cullinan J E Krook J A Mailliard R F Marschke H J Long J G Gerstner H E Windschitl 《Journal of clinical oncology》1988,6(5):825-831
A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if combination hormonal therapy with tamoxifen (TAM) and fluoxymesterone (FLU) was more efficacious than TAM alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients failing TAM could subsequently receive FLU. The dose of both drugs was 10 mg orally twice daily. Objective responses were seen in 50 of 119 TAM patients (42%) and 63 of 119 TAM plus FLU patients (53%) (one-sided P = .05). Time to disease progression distributions were better for TAM plus FLU (median, 350 days v 199 days), but the log rank test only approached statistical significance (one-sided P = .07). Duration of response and survival distributions were similar between the two treatment arms. Toxicities, in terms of androgenic side effects, were greater on the TAM plus FLU regimen. Fifty-two patients are evaluable for response with FLU following TAM and 21 (40%) have achieved a response. We conclude that the advantages in terms of response rate and time to progression observed with TAM plus FLU probably represent a biological effect, but are not of sufficient magnitude to justify the routine clinical use of this combination given the lack of survival advantage and side effects encountered. 相似文献
15.
Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-28. 总被引:16,自引:0,他引:16
Eleftherios P Mamounas John Bryant Barry Lembersky Louis Fehrenbacher Scot M Sedlacek Bernard Fisher D Lawrence Wickerham Greg Yothers Atilla Soran Norman Wolmark 《Journal of clinical oncology》2005,23(16):3686-3696
PURPOSE: The primary aim of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-28 was to determine whether four cycles of adjuvant paclitaxel (PTX) after four cycles of adjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) will prolong disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with four cycles of AC alone in patients with resected operable breast cancer and histologically positive axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 1995 and May 1998, 3,060 patients were randomly assigned (AC, 1,529; AC followed by PTX [AC --> PTX], 1,531). Patients > or = 50 years and those younger than 50 years with estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) -positive tumors also received tamoxifen for 5 years, starting with the first dose of AC. Postlumpectomy radiotherapy was mandated. Postmastectomy or regional radiotherapy was prohibited. Median follow-up is 64.6 months. RESULTS: The addition of PTX to AC significantly reduced the hazard for DFS event by 17% (relative risk [RR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.95; P = .006). Five-year DFS was 76% +/- 2% for patients randomly assigned to AC --> PTX compared with 72% +/- 2% for those randomly assigned to AC. Improvement in OS was small and not statistically significant (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.12; P = .46). Five-year OS was 85% +/- 2% for both groups. Subset analysis of the effect of paclitaxel according to hormone receptors or tamoxifen administration did not reveal statistically significant interaction (for DFS, P = .30 and P = .44, respectively). Toxicity with the AC --> PTX regimen was acceptable for the adjuvant setting. CONCLUSION: The addition of PTX to AC resulted in significant improvement in DFS but no significant improvement in OS with acceptable toxicity. No significant interaction between treatment effect and receptor status or tamoxifen administration was observed. 相似文献
16.
J N Ingle J A Mailliard D J Schaid J E Krook J B Gerstner D M Pfeifle R F Marschke H J Long G W McCormack J F Foley 《American journal of clinical oncology》1989,12(6):474-480
A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if combination therapy with doxorubicin, vincristine, and mitomycin C (DVM) was superior to doxorubicin alone in women with metastatic breast cancer for whom prior chemotherapy had failed. A total of 185 women were randomized to monthly courses of D (60 mg/m2, observation after 500 mg/m2); or D (50 mg/m2, maximum cumulative dose 500 mg/m2), V (1 mg/m2), and M (10 mg/m2, given every other cycle). Patients failing after D alone could receive V (1 mg weekly for 5 weeks, then 1.2 mg/m2 every 5 weeks) plus M (12 mg/m2 every 5 weeks). Objective responses were seen in 24 of 95 patients (25%) on D alone and 39 of 90 patients (43%) on DVM (two-sided p = 0.01). The time to disease progression distribution was significantly better for DVM (two-sided p = 0.02), but the magnitude of the advantage was small with the medians being 2.7 months for D and 4.2 months for DVM. There was no significant difference in survival between the two regimens. The degree of leukopenia was greater for DVM both in terms of median white blood cell nadir (1,300/microL versus 1,700/microL) and percentage of patients with a nadir less than 1,000/microL (33% versus 16%). A total of 45 patients received VM following D alone, and only seven (16%) achieved an objective response. We conclude that, despite a significantly higher response rate and longer time to progression, the degree of clinical benefit is not sufficient to recommend the combination of DVM over D alone as second-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. The level of efficacy seen with VM as tertiary therapy is low and is of such a magnitude to suggest that V adds little but toxicity to M. 相似文献
17.
Jinka R Sathya Ian R Davis Jim A Julian Qing Guo Dean Daya Ian S Dayes Himu R Lukka Mark Levine 《Journal of clinical oncology》2005,23(6):1192-1199
PURPOSE: To determine if iridium implant (IM) and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is better than standard EBRT in locally advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients with T2 and T3 prostate cancer with no evidence of metastatic disease were randomly assigned to EBRT of 66 Gy in 33 fractions during 6.5 weeks or to IM of 35 Gy delivered to the prostate during 48 hours plus EBRT of 40 Gy in 20 fractions during 4 weeks. The primary outcome consisted of biochemical or clinical failure (BCF). BCF was defined by biochemical failure, clinical failure, or death as a result of prostate cancer. Secondary outcomes included 2-year postradiation biopsy positivity, toxicity, and survival. RESULTS: Between 1992 and 1997, 51 patients were randomly assigned to receive IM plus EBRT, and 53 patients were randomly assigned to receive EBRT alone. The median follow-up was 8.2 years. In the IM plus EBRT arm, 17 patients (29%) experienced BCF compared with 33 patients (61%) in the EBRT arm (hazard ratio, 0.42; P = .0024). Eighty-seven patients (84%) had a postradiation biopsy; 10 (24%) of 42 in the IM plus EBRT arm had biopsy positivity compared with 23 (51%) of 45 in the EBRT arm (odds ratio, 0.30; P = .015). Overall survival was 94% in the IM plus EBRT arm versus 92% in the EBRT arm. CONCLUSION: The combination of IM plus EBRT was superior to EBRT alone for BCF and postradiation biopsy. This trial provides evidence that higher doses of radiation delivered in a shorter duration result in better local as well as biochemical control in locally advanced prostrate cancer. 相似文献
18.
Randomized trial of breast irradiation schedules after lumpectomy for women with lymph node-negative breast cancer 总被引:22,自引:0,他引:22
Whelan T MacKenzie R Julian J Levine M Shelley W Grimard L Lada B Lukka H Perera F Fyles A Laukkanen E Gulavita S Benk V Szechtman B 《Journal of the National Cancer Institute》2002,94(15):1143-1150
BACKGROUND: Breast irradiation after lumpectomy is an integral component of breast-conserving therapy that reduces the local recurrence of breast cancer. Because an optimal fractionation schedule (radiation dose given in a specified number of fractions or treatment sessions over a defined time) for breast irradiation has not been uniformly accepted, we examined whether a 22-day fractionation schedule was as effective as the more traditional 35-day schedule in reducing recurrence. METHODS: Women with invasive breast cancer who were treated by lumpectomy and had pathologically clear resection margins and negative axillary lymph nodes were randomly assigned to receive whole breast irradiation of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions over 22 days (short arm) or whole breast irradiation of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 35 days (long arm). The primary outcome was local recurrence of invasive breast cancer in the treated breast. Secondary outcomes included cosmetic outcome, assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Cosmetic Rating System. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: From April 1993 through September 1996, 1234 women were randomly assigned to treatment, 622 to the short arm and 612 to the long arm. Median follow-up was 69 months. Five-year local recurrence-free survival was 97.2% in the short arm and 96.8% in the long arm (absolute difference = 0.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.5% to 2.4%). No difference in disease-free or overall survival rates was detected between study arms. The percentage of patients with an excellent or good global cosmetic outcome at 3 years was 76.8% in the short arm and 77.0% in the long arm; the corresponding data at 5 years were 76.8% and 77.4%, respectively (absolute difference = -0.6%, 95% CI = -6.5% to 5.5%). CONCLUSION: The more convenient 22-day fractionation schedule appears to be an acceptable alternative to the 35-day schedule. 相似文献
19.
J A Wils J M Bliss M Marty G Coombes C Fontaine F Morvan T Olmos F R Pérez-López P Vassilopoulos E Woods R C Coombes 《Journal of clinical oncology》1999,17(7):1988-1998
PURPOSE: To assess whether the addition of epirubicin (EPI) therapy to prolonged treatment with tamoxifen (TAM) improves relapse-free and overall survival in postmenopausal women with node-positive primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred four patients entered onto a randomized clinical trial were allocated to receive TAM 20 mg/d for 4 years or TAM 20 mg/d for 4 years plus EPI 50 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks for six cycles. Analysis was performed according to allocated treatment, with all randomized patients included (intention to treat), irrespective of eligibility status. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 5.7 years, an improvement in relapse-free survival (RFS) was observed for the TAM and EPI-treated patients, compared with those who received TAM alone. The unadjusted hazard ratio was 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.96), with a corresponding reduction in the odds of recurrence of 27.9% (SD, 12. 3), which was statistically significant (P =.023). Adjustment for prognostic and/or predictive factors did not materially affect the hazard ratio. No difference was observed in terms of overall survival (reduction in odds of death, 11.9% [SD, 16.3]; P =.46). Combined chemohormonal treatment was associated with a higher incidence of acute side effects but without a clear increase in long-term cardiotoxicity. Twelve nonbreast second malignancies, including five hematologic malignancies (two of which were cases of acute myelogenous leukemia), were observed. CONCLUSION: The data show that combined chemohormonal treatment reduces the risk of relapse in postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. No evidence was found, however, for an improvement in overall survival. The size of benefit observed for both outcomes was consistent with that reported in the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group overview. The trial presented here, however, provides the first report of an improvement in RFS associated with the provision of a single cytotoxic drug in addition to prolonged TAM. 相似文献
20.
Rinaa S Punglia Karen M Kuntz Jason H Lee Abram Recht 《Journal of clinical oncology》2003,21(12):2260-2267
PURPOSE: To compare outcomes for hypothetical cohorts of postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors that are < or = 2 cm in size, with pathologically uninvolved axillary nodes, treated with radiation therapy plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone after breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: A Markov model was used to simulate patients' clinical course and estimate overall survival, recurrence-free survival, time with an intact breast, and death from breast cancer. Probabilities were derived from randomized trials and retrospective studies. Analyses were performed separately by age of diagnosis in 5-year increments from 50 to 80 years. Sensitivity analyses tested the stability of radiation benefit. RESULTS: The modeled recurrence-free survival benefit of giving radiation therapy was 3.35 years for women who were 50 years of age at diagnosis, versus 0.61 years for women who were 80 years of age. In the 50-year-old cohort, radiation therapy resulted in additional 0.60 years survival, compared with 0.04 years among 80-year-olds. A 50-year-old woman who received radiation therapy plus tamoxifen was less likely to die from breast cancer than if she received tamoxifen alone (2.43% v 5.29%; relative-risk reduction, 54%). An 80-year-old woman had a 1.17% chance of dying from breast cancer if she received radiation therapy plus tamoxifen, versus 2.02% with tamoxifen alone (relative-risk reduction, 42%). Sensitivity analyses showed that the magnitude of benefit was strongly influenced by including unequal rates of developing distant disease after breast recurrence between the treatment arms and varying rates of local recurrence. CONCLUSION: The absolute and relative benefits of radiation therapy and individual patient preferences for different health states should be considered when selecting treatment. 相似文献