Long-term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the PHOENIX 1 trial through up to 3 years

Background An unmet need remains for safe and effective long‐term treatments of psoriasis. Objectives To evaluate ustekinumab efficacy and safety for up to 3 years in the PHOENIX 1 trial. Methods Patients (n = 766) with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis were randomized to ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg at weeks 0 and 4, and then every 12 weeks, or placebo at weeks 0 and 4, with crossover to ustekinumab at week 12. Ustekinumab responders [≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at weeks 28 and 40] were re‐randomized at week 40 to continue or withdraw from treatment until psoriasis recurrence. Partial responders (week 28: PASI 50–74; week 40: < PASI 75) switched to dosing every 8 weeks. Clinical efficacy was assessed by PASI, the Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA), and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) measures. Results Overall, 79·8% of the ustekinumab‐treated patients remained in the study for 3 years. PASI 75 response rates (45 mg: 61·2%; 90 mg: 72·4%) at week 76 were maintained through year 3 (45 mg: 62·7%; 90 mg: 72·2%); PGA response was similarly durable. At year 3, 80·9% (45 mg) and 82·7% (90 mg) of week 40 responders continuing treatment every 12 weeks achieved a PASI 75 response, while 42·6% (45 mg) and 58·0% (90 mg) achieved a PASI 90 response. Among partial responders adjusted to dosing every 8 weeks, 50·9% (45 mg) and 52·0% (90 mg) had a PASI 75 response at year 3. DLQI responses paralleled the PASI responses. Through year 3, no dose response was observed in rates of adverse events (AEs), overall infections, serious AEs, or AEs leading to discontinuation; nor was there evidence of cumulative organ toxicity. Conclusions Continuous, stable, maintenance dosing with ustekinumab was generally well tolerated and sustained durable efficacy for up to 3 years of treatment.     

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from the SustaIMM phase 2/3 trial

Risankizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, selectively inhibits interleukin‐23, a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, by binding to its p19 subunit. In SustaIMM (ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03000075), a phase 2/3, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study, Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (n = 171) were stratified by bodyweight and concomitant psoriatic arthritis and randomized 2:2:1:1 to 75 mg risankizumab, 150 mg risankizumab, placebo with cross‐over to 75 mg risankizumab and placebo with cross‐over to 150 mg risankizumab. Dosing was at weeks 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40, with placebo cross‐over to risankizumab at week 16. The primary end‐point was 90% or more improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI‐90) at week 16 for risankizumab versus placebo. Missing data were imputed as non‐response. All primary and psoriasis‐related secondary end‐points were met for both risankizumab doses (P < 0.001). At week 16, PASI‐90 responses were significantly higher in patients receiving 75 mg (76%) or 150 mg (75%) risankizumab versus placebo (2%). Corresponding response rates were 86%, 93% and 10% for static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score of clear/almost clear; 90%, 95% and 9% for PASI‐75; and 22%, 33% and 0% for PASI‐100, with significantly higher responses for both risankizumab doses versus placebo. Through week 52, PASI and sPGA responses increased or were maintained and treatment‐emergent adverse events were comparable across treatment groups. Both doses of risankizumab were superior to placebo in treating patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The safety profile was consistent with previous risankizumab trials, with no new or unexpected safety findings.     

Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab treatment in elderly patients with psoriasis

The ratio of the elderly among psoriasis patients has been increasing. However, satisfactory long‐term management of psoriasis for the elderly is challenging because of the more frequent presence of comorbidities, and the higher risk of adverse events from systemic therapeutic agents than younger patients. The use of ustekinumab (UST) appears to be an appropriate systemic treatment because it is considered less likely to cause adverse events than other systemic treatments, as well as necessitating fewer hospital visits. Our retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of UST in elderly patients with psoriasis. The study included 24 patients aged over 65 years (range, 65–88 years; mean, 73.1 years) with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with impaired quality of life. Efficacy and safety were assessed over a 1‐year period using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and the Dermatology Live Quality Index (DLQI). The efficacy was evaluated by the proportion of subjects who achieved ≥75% reduction in PASI score (PASI 75). PASI 75 responses were 56.5% at week 16, 59.1% at week 28, and 60.0% at week 52. None of the patients developed any serious infection during the 1‐year treatment. The mean DLQI score at weeks 0, 16, 28, and 52 was 7.8 ± 6.0, 2.5 ± 3.4, 1.4 ± 1.7, and 1.2 ± 1.7, respectively. UST showed sufficient efficacy for elderly patients with psoriasis without any serious infection over the 1‐year treatment. Our results suggest that UST is the preferable agent for the treatment of elderly patients with psoriasis.     

Comprehensive long-term safety of adalimumab from 18 clinical trials in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

Adalimumab is a powerful drug used to treat psoriasis, that has been specially designed to mimic normal human molecules, and for this reason it is classed as a ‘biological’ drug. It reduces inflammation by inhibiting the activity of a chemical ‘cytokine’ in the body called ‘tumour necrosis factor alpha’ (TNF-alpha). The aim of this study, from the USA, was to assess long-term safety for patients with psoriasis receiving adalimumab. The authors looked at data from 3727 patients receiving the drug as part of 18 different clinical trials in which adverse events (AEs, meaning unwanted side effects while on the drug) were recorded. Overall, there were 16,536 AEs during 5429.7 patient years (304.6 AEs for every 100 patient years). Patient years (PYs) means the number of patients, multiplied by the amount of time they were included in the study. Most common AEs were nasopharyngitis (a common throat complaint), upper respiratory infection, and headache (23.7, 12.9, and 7.9 AEs per 100 PYs, respectively). Incidence rates for serious infections, tuberculosis, and opportunistic infections were 1.8, 0.3, and 0.02 AEs per 100 PYs, respectively. Incidence of malignancy (cancer) excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) was 0.8 AEs per 100 PYs. Incidences of NMSC and melanoma were 0.6 and 0.2 AEs per 100 PYs, respectively. The authors conclude that AE rates remained stable in this analysis of patients with psoriasis receiving adalimumab; no new safety signals (such as increased AEs) were identified compared with earlier studies.     

Cardiovascular safety of ustekinumab in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: results of integrated analyses of data from phase II and III clinical studies

Background Patients with psoriasis are believed to be at an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity, and the effect of biological agents on CV safety is not fully understood. Objectives To evaluate the effect of ustekinumab on CV events using detailed analyses of pooled data from the phase II/III clinical studies of its use in moderate to severe psoriasis. Methods The incidence of major adverse CV events [MACE: myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or CV death] is reported. Meta‐analyses using risk difference and odds ratio estimates are presented based on data collected during the placebo‐controlled period of ustekinumab trials. The cumulative numbers of events and rates of MIs and strokes over time were compared with those expected in the psoriasis and/or general populations. Results During the placebo‐controlled period (12/20 weeks), five MACE were reported in 1582 ustekinumab‐treated patients [0·3%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·1–0·7%] compared with no events in 732 placebo‐treated patients (0·0%; 95% CI 0·0–0·5%). MACE rates were stable over time during both the controlled and uncontrolled study periods, with 19 of 3117 ustekinumab‐treated patients (0·6%) experiencing 21 events for a combined event rate per 100 patient‐years of follow‐up of 0·44 (95% CI 0·27–0·67) through up to 3 years. Standardized incidence ratios for comparison of ustekinumab clinical data with external data sources ranged from 0·34 to 0·52, suggesting no increased risk of MI or stroke in ustekinumab‐treated patients compared with the general U.S. and psoriasis populations. Conclusions The totality of available clinical data suggests neither a detrimental nor a beneficial effect of ustekinumab on serious CV events. Additional data are needed to define the net effect of ustekinumab on CV events.     

Interleukin 10 treatment of psoriasis: clinical results of a phase 2 trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and clinical effects of interleukin 10 (IL-10) treatment of psoriasis. DESIGN AND METHODS: In an open-label phase 2 trial, 10 patients with psoriasis subcutaneously received recombinant human IL-10 over a 7-week period in a dosage of 8 microg/kg daily (n=5) or 20 microg/kg 3 times per week (n=5). Patients were followed up for an additional 5 weeks. RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated. Antipsoriatic effects were found in all but 1 patient. A significant decrease of the psoriasis area and severity index by 55.3% +/- 11.5% (mean +/- SEM) was observed (P<.02). The antipsoriatic efficiency was confirmed by histological examination. Heterogeneity in the effectiveness was found among the patients, but seems to be independent of the dosage regimen. However, a tendency to a better response was found in the patients who received 20-microg/kg IL-10 3 times per week. Decreasing response in the delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction against recall antigens indicated immunosuppressive effects. Moderate effects on hematopoietic cells were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that IL-10 therapy for psoriasis is safe and possibly clinically effective. Consequently, its value in psoriasis and similar immune diseases should be further determined. Dose-finding, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials are necessary now.     

Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis who have an inadequate response to ustekinumab: results of the randomized,double‐blind,phase III NAVIGATE trial

Psoriasis is a chronic disease causing red and scaling skin lesions. Current treatments, especially biologics, which are either given by injection or intravenous infusion (IV), are very effective in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. However, most patients look to achieve clear skin, so there is room for improvement. One approved biologic, ustekinumab, blocks two of the body's internal proteins, interleukin (IL)‐12 and IL‐23. Blocking these proteins prevents signals that cause inflammation in psoriasis. While ustekinumab is effective in many patients, most will not achieve complete skin clearance. Because recent scientific evidence shows that IL‐23 may be more important than IL‐12 in causing psoriasis, guselkumab, a new treatment that specifically targets IL‐23, but not IL‐12, has been developed and was recently approved in the U.S. to treat moderate to severe psoriasis. In the NAVIGATE trial, 871 patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis received ustekinumab and if, after 16 weeks, patients were not clear or almost clear, they were randomly assigned to either continue ustekinumab or start treatment with guselkumab until week 44. From week 16 until week 40, the average number of visits (maximum = 4) at which patients were clear or almost clear was significantly greater in patients treated with guselkumab (1.5) than with ustekinumab (0.7). In addition, at week 28, twice the proportion of patients on guselkumab (31.1%) were clear or almost clear than on ustekinumab (14.3%). Infections were the most commonly reported adverse event among patients on either guselkumab or ustekinumab. The authors conclude that for patients who do not achieve clear or almost clear skin after ustekinumab treatment, switching to guselkumab could be an effective treatment strategy and did not raise safety concerns.     

Ustekinumab improves health-related quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the PHOENIX 1 trial

Background PHOENIX 1 was a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study that demonstrated the long‐term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. Objectives To assess the effect of ustekinumab maintenance therapy on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in PHOENIX 1 patients. Patients and methods Patients (n = 766) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 45 mg (n = 255) or 90 mg (n = 256) at weeks 0 and 4 and every 12 weeks thereafter, or placebo (n = 255) at weeks 0 and 4 with crossover to ustekinumab at week 12. Ustekinumab‐randomized patients achieving at least 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 at weeks 28 and 40 were re‐randomized at week 40 to continue ustekinumab or be withdrawn until loss of therapeutic effect. HRQoL was assessed using the SF‐36 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Results At baseline, more than 97% had a DLQI > 1 and the average DLQI was > 10, indicating a significant impact on patients’ HRQoL. Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving ustekinumab 45 and 90 mg achieved a normalized DLQI score (≤ 1) compared with placebo (53·2%, 52·4% and 6·0%, respectively, both P < 0·001) at week 12 and achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (increase of at least five points) in SF‐36 physical (23·1%, 33·7% and 15·6%) and mental (25·5%, 31·3% and 14·8%) component summary scores. At week 12, changes in individual DLQI and SF‐36 domains were significantly better in each ustekinumab group vs. placebo (P < 0·001). The magnitude of improvement across SF‐36 scales was greatest for the bodily pain and social functioning domains. Improvements in HRQoL were sustained with maintenance ustekinumab therapy through at least 1 year. Regression analysis showed that, after adjustment for improvement in PASI or Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA), ustekinumab‐treated patients demonstrated significant improvements in DLQI. Conclusions Ustekinumab improves HRQoL in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. Patient‐reported outcomes measured a treatment effect beyond that indicated by clinical measures.     

Apremilast,an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor,in the treatment of Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy,safety and tolerability results from a phase 2b randomized controlled trial

Apremilast, an oral, small‐molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, works intracellularly within immune cells to regulate inflammatory mediators. This phase 2b randomized, placebo‐controlled study evaluated efficacy and safety of apremilast among Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. In total, 254 patients were randomized to placebo, apremilast 20 mg b.i.d. (apremilast 20) or apremilast 30 mg b.i.d. (apremilast 30) through week 16; thereafter, all placebo patients were re‐randomized to apremilast 20 or 30 through week 68. Efficacy assessments included achievement of 75% or more reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI‐75; primary) and achievement of static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA; secondary) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (minimal) at week 16. Safety was assessed through week 68. At week 16, PASI‐75 response rates were 7.1% (placebo), 23.5% (apremilast 20; P = 0.0032 vs placebo) and 28.2% (apremilast 30; P = 0.0003 vs placebo); sPGA response rates (score of 0 or 1) were 8.8% (placebo), 23.9% (apremilast 20; P = 0.0165 vs placebo) and 29.6% (apremilast 30; P = 0.0020 vs placebo). Responses were maintained with apremilast through week 68. Most common adverse events (AEs) with placebo, apremilast 20 and apremilast 30 (0–16 weeks) were nasopharyngitis (8.3%, 11.8%, 11.8%), diarrhea (1.2%, 8.2%, 9.4%), and abdominal discomfort (1.2%, 1.2%, 7.1%), respectively. Exposure‐adjusted incidence of these AEs did not increase with continued apremilast treatment (up to 68 weeks). Apremilast demonstrated efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis through 68 weeks that was generally consistent with prior studies.     

Adalimumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from a Phase II/III randomized controlled study

Incidence of psoriasis vulgaris in Asians is estimated at 0.05–0.3%. Studies in North America and Europe demonstrated that adalimumab, a fully human, recombinant, immunoglobulin G₁ monoclonal antibody, was efficacious and well‐tolerated in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. This 24‐week, placebo‐controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of three different dosing regimens of adalimumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (n = 169). Patients were randomized to receive adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow), adalimumab 80‐mg loading dose at week 0 followed by adalimumab 40 mg eow starting at week 2, adalimumab 80 mg eow, or placebo eow given as s.c. injections. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving a 75% or greater improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) score at week 16. At week 16, PASI 75 response rates were significantly greater for all three adalimumab groups (40 mg eow: 57.9%, P < 0.001; 40 mg eow plus loading dose: 62.8%, P < 0.001; 80 mg eow: 81.0%, P < 0.001) versus placebo (4.3%). As early as week 4, the 40‐mg eow plus loading dose and 80‐mg eow groups achieved significantly greater PASI 75 response rates compared with placebo. Injection‐site reactions and hepatic events occurred in greater percentages of adalimumab‐treated patients compared with placebo. Adalimumab therapy demonstrated efficacy and safety at all three dosage regimens. Rapid response rate in patients receiving 40 mg eow plus loading dose supports using an 80‐mg loading dose in the treatment of psoriasis.     

Changes in the sex hormone profile of male patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis under systemic therapy: results of a prospective longitudinal pilot study

Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis exhibit increased cardiovascular mortality. Recent publications point towards psoriasis-induced insulin resistance as an important pathomechanism driving cardiovascular comorbidity in these patients. As the hormonal status in general and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) in particular serve as sensitive indicators for insulin resistance, we analysed these parameters in the context of a set of multiple additional clinical and laboratory measurements in a cohort of male patients. Of 33 consecutively enrolled male patients receiving continuous systemic therapy for their moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis, 23 male patients for whom all parameters could be collected over a 24-week treatment period were included in this analysis. At baseline, testosterone levels varied between 212 and 660 ng/ml (median: 377.0), and SHBG between 11.9 and 46.0 nmol/l (median: 29.2), thus documenting lack of hypogonadism among these patients. Clinically, 19/23 patients experienced at least a 50% reduction in their PASI under therapy. Using a multivariate regression model to further analyse the sub-group of patients responding to treatment, hs-CRP, PASI, leptin and resistin all improved under effective systemic anti-inflammatory therapy, thus losing their significant influence on SHBG. SHBG performed well as a sensitive biomarker for insulin resistance and systemic inflammation in these patients. Its improvement, as well as the reduction of resistin serum levels, most likely reflects a state of reduced cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing effective continuous systemic therapy. Long-term safety data, generated e.g. from psoriasis registries, are needed to assess whether this effect translates into reduced cardiovascular mortality.     

Efficacy and safety of infliximab vs. methotrexate in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results of an open-label, active-controlled, randomized trial (RESTORE1)

Background Infliximab is indicated for treatment of moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis in adults whose disease cannot be controlled with other systemic therapies, including methotrexate (MTX). To date, no studies have directly compared the efficacy and safety of infliximab and MTX. Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab vs. MTX in adults with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. Methods MTX‐naïve patients (n = 868) were randomized 3 : 1 to receive infliximab 5 mg kg^?1 at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22 or MTX 15 mg weekly with a dose increase to 20 mg weekly at week 6 if the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response was < 25%. At week 16, patients with < PASI 50 response could switch treatment groups. The primary efficacy endpoint was PASI 75 response at week 16. Major secondary efficacy endpoints were PASI 75 response at week 26, and the proportion of patients achieving a Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) score of cleared (0) or minimal (1) at weeks 16 and 26. Others included Dermatology Life Quality Index, 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey, and PGA, PASI 50, PASI 75 and PASI 90 responses over time. Results The primary endpoint was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of infliximab‐treated patients (508/653, 78%) than MTX‐treated patients (90/215, 42%; P < 0·001). Key secondary endpoints also were achieved by a greater proportion of infliximab‐treated patients. Similar responses were observed at week 26 in patients who switched from MTX to infliximab at week 16. Overall adverse event (AE) incidence was comparable between groups, but incidence of serious and severe AEs was slightly higher in the infliximab group. Conclusions Infliximab was well tolerated and more efficacious than MTX in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. Infliximab also was efficacious in patients who failed MTX and switched to infliximab.     

CLinical experience acquired with the efalizumab (Raptiva) (CLEAR) trial in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results from a phase III international randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Efalizumab (anti-CD11a), a humanized monoclonal antibody, blocks multiple T-cell-dependent functions implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, including T-cell activation, migration to the skin, reactivation in psoriatic skin and interactions with keratinocytes. OBJECTIVES: This multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous efalizumab 1.0 mg kg-1 once weekly for 12 weeks compared with placebo in a population that included high-need patients, defined as those for whom at least two systemic therapies were unsuitable because of lack of efficacy, intolerance or contraindication. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis [involvement of >or=10% of total body surface area and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)>or=12.0 at screening] were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive efalizumab or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving >or=75% PASI improvement (PASI-75 response) at week 12 in the intention-to-treat population; secondary endpoints included changes in PASI, static Physician's Global Assessment, Physician's Global Assessment of change from baseline and percentage of body surface area affected. Results We enrolled 793 patients (529 received efalizumab and 264 placebo), including 526 high-need patients (342 received efalizumab and 184 placebo). Week 12 PASI-75 rates were 29.5% for efalizumab compared with 2.7% for placebo among high-need patients (P<0.0001) and 31.4% for efalizumab compared with 4.2% for placebo in the full study population (P<0.0001). RESULTS: for all secondary efficacy endpoints showed superiority of efalizumab over placebo in both the high-need and the full populations. Efalizumab demonstrated a favourable safety profile, without evidence of systemic toxicity, in both the high-need group and the overall study population. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of efalizumab therapy were comparable between high-need patients and the more general moderate-to-severe psoriasis patient population. In view of its demonstrated efficacy and safety profile, efalizumab represents a valuable option for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, including high-need patients.