Pacemaker optimization in nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular pacing as an available option

Background: Echocardiographic (ECHO)‐guided pacemaker optimization (PMO) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) nonresponders acutely improves left ventricular (LV) function. However, the chronic results of LV pacing in this group are less understood. Methods: We retrospectively studied 28 CRT nonresponders optimized based on ECHO to LV pacing and compared them to 28 age‐ and gender‐matched patients optimized to biventricular (BiV) pacing. ECHOs with tissue Doppler imaging assessed LV hemodynamics before, immediately after, and 29 ± 16 months after PMO. Also, 56 age‐ and gender‐matched CRT responders were included for comparison of clinical outcomes. Results: PMO resulted in acute improvements in longitudinal LV systolic function and several measures of dyssynchrony, with greater improvements in the LV paced group. Chronic improvements in ejection fraction (EF) (3.2 ± 7.7%), and left ventricle end‐systolic volume (LVESV) (?11 ± 36 mL) and one dyssynchrony measure were seen in the combined group. Chronically, both LV and BiV paced patients improved some measures of systolic function and dyssynchrony although response varied between the groups. Survival at 3.5 years was similar (P = 0.973) between the PMO (58%) and nonoptimized groups (58%) but survival free of cardiovascular hospitalization was significantly (P = 0.037) better in the nonoptimized group. Conclusions : CRT nonresponders undergoing PMO to either LV or BiV pacing have acute improvements in longitudinal systolic function and some measures of dyssynchrony. Some benefits are sustained chronically, with improvements in EF, LVESV, and dyssynchrony. A strategy of ECHO‐guided PMO results in survival for CRT nonresponders similar to that of CRT patients not referred for PMO. (PACE 2012; 35:685–694))     

Transseptal left ventricular endocardial pacing reduces dispersion of ventricular repolarization

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be proarrhythmic in some patients. This may be due to the effect of left ventricular (LV) epicardial pacing on ventricular repolarization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of endocardial versus epicardial LV biventricular pacing on surface electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters that are known markers of arrhythmogenic repolarization. Methods: ECG markers of repolarization (QT dispersion, QTD; T peak to end, T_peak‐end; T_peak‐end dispersion, T_peak‐endD; QTc) were retrospectively measured before and after CRT in seven patients with transseptal LV endocardial leads (TS group), 28 matched patients with coronary sinus (CS) LV leads (CS group), and eight patients with surgical LV epicardial leads (SUR group). All ECGs were scanned and analyzed using digital callipers. Results: Compared to the CS group, the TS group CRT was associated with a significant postpacing reduction in QTD (?45.2 ± 35.6 vs ?4.3 ± 43.6 ms, P = 0.03) and T_peak‐end (?24.2 ± 22.1 vs 3.4 ± 26.7 ms, P = 0.02). There was a nonsignificant post‐CRT reduction in both T_peak‐endD (?11.3 ± 31.0 vs 2.4 ± 28.9 ms, P = 0.27) and QTc (?50.0 ± 46.4 vs 4.4 ± 70.2 ms, P = 0.06) in the TS versus the CS group. In contrast, there were no differences between the SUR and CS groups in terms of the effect of CRT on these repolarization parameters. Conclusions: CRT with (atrial transseptal) endocardial LV lead placement is associated with repolarization characteristics that are considered to be less arrhythmogenic than those generated by CS (epicardial) LV lead placement. Further work is needed to determine whether these changes translate to a reduction in proarrhythmia. (PACE 2011; 34:1258–1266)     

Latency during left ventricular pacing from the lateral cardiac veins: a cause of ineffectual biventricular pacing

We report three patients with cardiomyopathy and pronounced stimulus to QRS latency during left ventricular (LV) pacing from an epicardial cardiac vein. Delayed LV activation during simultaneous biventricular pacing produced an electrocardiographic pattern dominated by right ventricular stimulation. Hemodynamic parameters improved immediately after advancing LV stimulation (in one patient) or pacing the LV only (in two patients) coupled with dramatic improvement of heart failure symptoms.     

Inappropriate pacing due to autoperpetuation of the ventricular rate stabilization algorithm: a manifestation of T wave oversensing by ICDs

Preventive pacing algorithms designed to eliminate the pause that follows a premature ventricular depolarization have been incorporated in current implantable defibrillators. We report a patient in whom intermittent T wave oversensing frequently invoked the ventricular rate stabilization algorithm and resulted in periods of inappropriate VVI pacing. The problem was solved by decreasing the maximum sensitivity from 0.3 mV to 0.45 mV. Implant testing had revealed adequate sensing of ventricular fibrillation with a maximum sensitivity of 1.2 mV.     

The benefits of biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with narrow QRS, NYHA class II and right ventricular pacing

OBJECTIVE: To identify subgroups of heart failure patients who might benefit from biventricular pacing. BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves the quality of life, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and exercise capacity and decreases hospitalizations for heart failure for patients who have severe heart failure and a wide QRS. It is unclear if other populations of heart failure patients would benefit from CRT. METHODS: One hundred forty-four consecutive heart failure patients who underwent CRT and completed 3 months of follow-up were reviewed. Demographic, echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcome data were analyzed to assess the relationship of functional class and QRS duration before device implantation to postimplant outcomes. RESULTS: There were 20, 88, and 36 patients in NYHA functional class II, III, and IV, respectively. Thirty-four patients had right ventricular pacing and another 29 patients had a QRS duration < or = 150 ms. Patients who were in NYHA functional class II at baseline had significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and indices of left ventricular remodeling after CRT. Similar significant findings were seen in the subgroup with right ventricular pacing at baseline after CRT. However, in the subgroup with a narrow QRS duration, there were no significant changes in the indices of left ventricular remodeling or in the NYHA functional class and there was a significant increase in the QRS duration. For the study cohort as a whole, an improvement in NYHA functional class after CRT correlated with a significant decrease in adverse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure patients who were in NYHA functional class II and those with right ventricular pacing appeared to benefit from CRT.     

Prolonged paced QRS duration as a predictor for congestive heart failure in patients with right ventricular apical pacing

BACKGROUND: The recent studies showed that right ventricular (RV) pacing was associated with worsening of heart failure. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical significance of paced QRS duration during RV pacing to predict congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study enrolled in 92 patients with atrioventricular block who underwent initial pacemaker implantation. The paced QRS duration was automatically obtained by electrocardiography immediately after pacemaker implantation and then by routine attendance at a pacemaker clinic every 3 months. The paced QRS duration was positively correlated with left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (P < 0.05) and left ventricular end-systolic dimension (P < 0.05), and tended to negatively correlate with left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.0507). The paced QRS duration immediately after pacemaker implantation was 170.4 +/- 18.9 ms. During a mean follow-up period of 53 +/- 16 months, 16 patients developed CHF. We selected as a cut-off value the nearest whole number (190 ms) that was one standard deviation greater than the mean, and divided into two groups according to baseline paced QRS duration. Patients with a paced QRS duration of <190 ms comprised group A (n = 77, nine of which developed CHF) and the remainder comprised group B (n = 15, seven of which developed CHF). Prolonged paced QRS duration (> or =190 ms) was associated with a significant increase in the overall morbidity of CHF (P < 0.05). Additionally, paced QRS duration significantly prolonged during the follow-up period among group A patients with CHF (P < 0.05), but did not change among patients without CHF. CONCLUSION: We concluded that paced QRS duration can be a useful indicator of impaired left ventricular function in patients with RV pacing. Even in patients whose paced QRS duration is relatively shorter, progressive prolongation of paced QRS duration can predict the development of CHF.     

Performance of left ventricular versus biventricular pacing in chronic heart failure assessed by stress echocardiography

Acute hemodynamic studies suggest that resynchronization therapy using single-site left ventricular pacing (LVP) is equivalent to biventricular pacing (BIVP). The aim of this study was to assess the performance of LVP versus BIVP during exercise by means of stress echocardiography. A total of 28 patients (25 men and 3 women, mean age 60.9 +/- 8 years) with advanced chronic heart failure and impaired ventricular conduction (QRS > 150 ms) were studied. Patients were randomly allocated to either BIVP or LVP mode with a crossover on the next day and cardiac output was estimated at rest and during each stage of bicycle ergometry in supine position by means of velocity time integral formula. Maximum exercise level was comparable for both pacing modes (up to 100 W) and no significant differences were revealed either in heart rate or in blood pressure at rest and during any step of exercise. LVP was associated with significantly higher cardiac output at rest (3.2 +/- 0.5 vs 2.8 +/- 0.6 l/min, P < 0.01) and during low level exercise (4.4 +/- 0.8 vs 3.9 +/- 0.8 l/min at 25 W, P < 0.05) as compared with BIVP. There was a trend towards higher cardiac output for LVP even at higher levels of exercise. These effects were predominantly confined to patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. It is concluded that cardiac resynchronization therapy using single-site LVP results in better hemodynamic response as compared with BIVP, both at rest and during physical exercise.     

Electrocardiographic patterns during: pacing the great cardiac and middle cardiac veins

BACKGROUND: The electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns during pacing from the great cardiac vein (GCV) and the middle cardiac vein (MCV) are not well known. METHODS: We recorded 12-lead ECGs during GCV and MCV pacing in 26 patients undergoing implantation of a cardiac resynchronization device. The left ventricular (LV) lead was passed down the GCV (n = 19) or MCV (n = 7) prior to moving it to a lateral or posterolateral vein for permanent implantation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Pacing within the GCV resulted in a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology with no or minimal R-wave in V(1) in 14 patients and a right bundle branch block (RBBB) pattern (R > S in lead V(1)) in four patients. In one patient, lead V1 during GCV pacing was isoelectric (R = S). A more distal pacing site in the GCV yielded a LBBB pattern in all the patients. All leads placed in the MCV resulted in a LBBB configuration. An ECG pattern with a RBBB pattern was invariably recorded during LV pacing in 125 consecutive outpatients with biventricular pacemakers and LV leads in the posterolatral and lateral coronary veins. Knowledge of the ECG patterns from various pacing sites in the coronary venous system may be helpful for troubleshooting all types of pacing systems, especially those where the coronary venous pacing site is unintentional.     

Invasive optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: role of sequential biventricular and left ventricular pacing

BACKGROUND: Aim of this invasive study was to characterize and quantify changes in left ventricular (LV) systolic function due to sequential biventricular pacing (BV) as compared to right atrial triggered simultaneous BV (BV(0)), LV, and right ventricular (RV) pacing in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: In 22 CHF patients, all in sinus rhythm, temporary multisite pacing was performed prior to implantation of a permanent system. LV systolic function was evaluated invasively by the maximum rate of LV pressure increase (dP/dt(max)). Sequential BV pacing was performed with preactivation of either ventricle at 20-80 ms. RESULTS: In comparison to RV pacing, LV and BV(0) pacing increased dP/dt(max) by 33.9 +/- 19.3% and 34.0 +/- 22.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). In 9 patients, optimized sequential BV pacing further improved dP/dt(max) by 8.5 +/- 4.8% compared to BV(0) (range 3.3-17.1, P < 0.05). In 10 patients exhibiting a PR interval < or =200 ms, LV pacing was either superior (n = 6) or equal to BV(0) pacing (n = 4). In these 10 patients, LV pacing yielded a 7.4 +/- 8.0% higher dP/dt(max) than BV(0) pacing (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using sequential BV pacing, generally with LV preactivation, moderate improvements in LV systolic function can be achieved in selected patients. Baseline PR interval may aid in the selection of the optimum cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) mode, favoring LV pacing in patients with a PR interval < or =200 ms.     

Morphology of the RV electrogram during LV pacing is related to the hemodynamic effect in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background: Biventricular (BiV) pacing and left ventricular (LV) pacing both improve LV function in patients with heart failure and LV dyssynchrony. We studied the hemodynamic effect of the atrioventricular (AV) interval and the associated changes in the right ventricular (RV) electrogram (EGM) during LV pacing and compared this with the hemodynamic effect of optimized sequential BiV pacing.
Methods: In 16 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV, sinus rhythm with normal AV conduction, left bundle branch block (LBBB), QRS > 130 ms, and optimal medical therapy, the changes in RV EGM during LV pacing with varying AV intervals were studied. The hemodynamic effect associated with these changes was evaluated by invasive measurement of LVdP/dt_max and compared with the result of optimized sequential BiV pacing in the same patient.
Results: All patients showed electrocardiographic fusion during LV pacing. The morphology of the RV EGM showed changes in the RV activation that indicated a shift in the extent of fusion from LV pacing. These changes were associated with significant changes in LVdP/dt_max. Baseline LV dP/dt_max was 734 ± 177 mmHg/s, which increased to 927 ± 202 mmHg/s (P<0.0001) with optimized LV pacing and to 920 ± 209 mmHg/s (P<0.0001) with optimized sequential BiV pacing.
Conclusion: The RV EGM is a proper indicator for intrinsic activation over the right bundle during LV pacing and reveals the transition to fusion in the RV EGM that is associated with a decrease in LVdP/dt_max. The hemodynamic effect of optimized LV pacing is equal to optimized sequential BiV pacing.     

Altered left ventricular contraction pattern during right ventricular pacing: assessment using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography

Background: Chronic right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing has been associated with increased risk of heart failure and adverse outcome. The acute effects of RVA pacing on three‐dimensional (3D) ventricular function and mechanical dyssynchrony are not well known. We performed a real‐time 3D echocardiographic (RT3DE) study to assess global and regional left ventricular function during RVA pacing. Methods: Twenty‐six patients with implanted cardiac devices and normal intrinsic atrioventricular conduction were included in the study. RT3DE was performed during intrinsic sinus rhythm and during RVA pacing. Quantification of global and regional left ventricular function was performed offline by time‐volume analysis of 16 myocardial segments. Time to reach minimum regional volume was calculated for each segment as a percentage of the cardiac cycle. The systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI) was defined as the standard deviation of these time periods. Longitudinal function was assessed by time‐volume analysis of apical, midventricular, and basal segments. Results: During RVA pacing, a reversed apical‐to‐basal longitudinal contraction sequence was observed in 58% of all patients. RVA pacing was associated with increased left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony (SDI increase from 4.4 ± 2.2% to 6.3 ± 2.4%, P = 0.001) and reduced LV ejection fraction (decrease from 53 ± 13% to 47 ± 14%, P = 0.05). Conclusion: RT3DE assessment of LV function provides evidence that pacing from the RVA results in acute alterations in LV contraction sequence and increased LV dyssynchrony. Further studies are warranted to assess the potential of RT3DE to identify patients who might be at increased risk of pacing‐induced heart failure or who might benefit from alternate‐site or multisite pacing. (PACE 2011; 76–81)     

Maximizing biventricular pacing in patients with rate‐controlled atrial fibrillation using ventricular sense response

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is challenging because the ventricular rate of conducted AF exceeds the biventricular pacing rate. In the current report, we present a patient who received a CRT device that was programmed to ventricular sense response (VSR) on with VVI 40 beats per minute to allow the AF to be paced as fusion beats. We found that the pacing configuration resulting in the narrowest QRS in this patient was VVI 40 with VSR biventricular fusion pacing during AF. VSR mode allows for CRT delivery without the need to artificially increase heart rate.     

Understanding the Timing Cycles of a Cardiac Resynchronization Device Designed with Left Ventricular Sensing

Some devices used for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can sense from the left ventricular (LV) lead as in Biotronik CRT devices (Biotronik GmbH, Berlin, Germany), whose special LV timing cycles form the basis of this report. LV sensing (LVs) was designed to prevent competitive pacing outside the LV myocardial absolute refractory period. LVs works by inhibiting the release of an LV pacemaker stimulus (LVp) in the vulnerable period of the LV during a programmable period. LVs with stored LV electrograms may also provide recordings of diagnostic value in tachyarrhythmias. LVs has added a new dimension to the evaluation of the function of CRT devices, because it is manifested by unfamiliar timing cycles. In this respect, Biotronik devices can initiate an LV upper rate interval (URI) upon sensing a right‐sided event when LVs is turned off. An inhibited LVp can also initiate an LVURI. The LVURI should generally be programmed to a relatively short duration and shorter than the right ventricular URI to prevent a special form of desynchronization arrhythmia sustained by LVs. This arrhythmia is characterized by recurring delayed LVs events in sequences associated with RV pacing followed by LVs events with loss of LVp.     

Evaluation of the early hemodynamic changes in carotid arteries during ventricular and dual chamber pacing

In spite of a wide choice of pacemakers, there are some problems in making more rational clinical decisions for individual patients since mode selection and programming is usually performed on the basis of a clinical hunch. The aim of this study was to measure the differences in carotid flow in patients with a pacemaker programmed in the dual chamber and in the single chamber pacing modes. Sixty patients with implanted bipolar DDD pacemakers were enrolled in this study. Blood peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV), cross-sectional area, resistive index (RI), and pulsatility index (PI) were measured in the common (CCA), internal (ICA), and external (ECA) carotid arteries before pacemaker implantation and after dual chamber and ventricular pacing at 60 beats/min. PSVs in the left CCA (79.3 +/- 24.9 cm/s) and right CCA (84.1 +/- 18.7) were shown to significantly decrease after VVI pacing (60.1 +/- 16.6 and 62.1 +/- 20.0, respectively). There was also a similar significant decrease in PSV in the left and right ICAs and ECAs. Besides PSV, RI, and PI in the left and right CCAs, ICAs, and ECAs significantly decreased after VVI pacing. There was no similar decrease after DDD pacing. Cross-sectional area and flow volume in the CCA, ICA, and ECA were similar after DDD and VVI pacing and before pacemaker implantation suggesting that cardiac output was similar when the measurements were recorded. Carotid artery PSVs, pulsatility, and RIs were found to be significantly decreased during VVI pacing compared to baseline and DDD pacing. The greater incidence of adverse cerebral outcomes in patients with VVI rather than DDD pacing may be partly due to decreased carotid PSVs.     

Comparison of the efficacy of two surgical alternatives for cardiac resynchronization therapy: trans-apical versus epicardial left ventricular pacing

Background: Epicardial pacing lead implantation is the currently preferred surgical alternative for left ventricular (LV) lead placement. For endocardial LV pacing, we developed a fundamentally new surgical method. The trans‐apical lead implantation is a minimally invasive technique that provides access to any LV segments. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the outcome of patients undergoing either trans‐apical endocardial or epicardial LV pacing. Methods: In group I, 11 end‐stage heart failure (HF) patients (mean age 59.7 ± 7.9 years) underwent trans‐apical LV lead implantation. Epicardial LV leads were implanted in 12 end‐stage HF patients (group II; mean age 62.8 ± 7.3 years). Medical therapy was optimized in all patients. The following parameters were compared during an 18‐month follow‐up period: LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDD), LV end‐systolic diameter, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Results: Nine out of 11 patients responded favorably to the treatment in group I (LVEF 39.7 ± 12.5 vs 26.0 ± 7.8%, P < 0.01; LVEDD 70.4 ± 13.6 mm vs 73.7 ± 10.5 mm, P = 0.002; NYHA class 2.2 ± 0.4 vs 3.5 ± 0.4, P < 0.01) and eight out of 12 in group II (LVEF 31.5 ± 11.5 vs 26.4 ± 8.9%, P = < 0.001; NYHA class 2.7 ± 0.4 vs 3.6 ± 0.4, P < 0.05). During the follow‐up period, one patient died in group I and three in group II. There was one intraoperative LV lead dislocation in group I and one early postoperative dislocation in each group. None of the patients developed thromboembolic complications. Conclusions: Our data suggest that trans‐apical endocardial LV lead implantation is an alternative to epicardial LV pacing. PACE 2012; 35:124–130)