Arthroskopie nach Trauma des Hüftgelenks

Intra-articular injuries are common after dislocation and fracture of the hip joint and can be addressed using hip arthroscopy. The most common indications for this procedure are loose bodies, labral tears and chondral defects. In addition, preexisting femoroacetabular impingement can be addressed at the time of surgery. Arthroscopically guided fracture reduction and fixation has been described. We present two case reports of intra-articular lesions after traumatic hip dislocation. The first is a case of a man with an anterior labral tear and loose bodies after closed hip reduction. The second case is a man with a large anterior labral tear with preexisting femoroacetabular impingement. Both of them were treated by arthroscopic debridement of the unstable labrum. In addition loose bodies were removed in the first patient and a femoral osteoplasty was performed in the second patient. Hip arthroscopy has proven to be a safe and effective surgical technique for treating specific post-traumatic lesions and preexisting femoroacetabular impingement. The current case reports provide an overview of the indication for hip arthroscopy following traumatic injuries to the hip.     

髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击征的研究进展

股骨髋臼撞击征是近10余年才被逐渐认识的一种髋关节疾病,也是年轻人髋部疼痛的常见病因之一,其会导致髋关节运动过程中异常应力接触,这种病理力学机制与早期骨关节炎的发展密切相关。手术本身主要针对于病因进行治疗。随着关节镜技术和可折弯器械的发展,髋关节镜运用得越来越广泛,患者创伤小、术后康复较快且并发症发生率较低,短期和中期的效果令人满意,单纯盂唇修复的效果也优于单纯清理术,但是这些尚需要长期和大样本量的结果来进行随访。     

Abdominal Fluid Extravasation During Hip Arthroscopy

Hip arthroscopy has gained popularity in recent years as an alternative to open treatment for several conditions including bursitis, acetabular labral tears, synovitis, arthritis, extraction of loose bodies, and femoroacetabular impingement. Complications during hip arthroscopy are rare in the current literature, but reports include venous thromboembolism, peripheral nerve injury, septic arthritis, instrument failure, and various problems associated with joint traction. Extravasation of fluid into the abdomen during hip arthroscopy is another rare but known complication. We report an occurrence of extravasation of fluid into the abdomen during arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement and our management of the condition postoperatively.     

Iliopsoas Impingement: A Newly Identified Cause of Labral Pathology in the Hip

Labral tears typically occur anterosuperiorly in association with femoroacetabular impingement or dysplasia. Less commonly, labral pathology may occur in an atypical direct anterior location adjacent to the iliopsoas tendon in the absence of bony abnormalities. We hypothesize that this pattern of injury is related to compression or traction on the anterior capsulo-labral complex by the iliopsoas tendon where it crosses the acetabular rim. In a retrospective review of prospectively collected data, we identified 25 patients that underwent isolated, primary, unilateral iliopsoas release and presented for at least 1 year follow-up (mean 21 months). Pre-operative demographics, clinical presentation, intra-operative findings, and outcome questionnaires were analyzed. The injury was treated with a tenotomy of the iliopsoas tendon at the level of the joint line and either labral debridement or repair. Mean post-operative outcome scores were 87.17, 92.46, and 78.8 for the modified Harris Hip Score, activities of daily living Hip Outcome Score, and sports-related score, respectively. The atypical labral injury identified in this study appears to represent a distinct pathological entity, psoas impingement, with an etiology which has not been previously described.     

Editorial Commentary: Revision Hip Surgery After Arthroscopy—What Went Wrong? Are There Second Chances?

Hip arthroscopy allows minimally invasive treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with labral tears. Over the last 2 decades, the indications and techniques for treatment of FAI have evolved, and complex pathology can now be treated arthroscopically. Short- and medium-term patient-reported outcomes demonstrate the reliability of hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAI, although a subset of patients fail to achieve desired results and require revision surgery. The indications for revision surgery after a primary hip arthroscopy are not well described in a large series, and most reviews focus on revision arthroscopy at the exclusion of open surgery (notably periacetabular osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty). Furthermore, patient-reported outcomes after these revision procedures have not been recently summarized.     

Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients Older Than 50 Years—Proceed With Caution

Hip arthroscopy has been shown to be a successful procedure to treat young patients with labral pathology caused by femoroacetabular impingement. However, as patients age and there is an associated increase in hip pathology, the results become less consistent. Although some patients will have decreased symptoms, approximately 25% to 30% will require total hip arthroplasty 2 to 5 years after the procedure.     

Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement

The purpose of this study was to establish that anterior hip impingement, secondary to an anterior femoral offset deficiency from a pistol-grip deformity, was a common etiology of hip disorders. This impingement results in a spectrum of injury ranging from anterior hip pain, labral tears, damage to the acetabular articular cartilage and idiopathic arthritis. This was accomplished through three separate but closely related studies: (1) an arthroscopic labral tear study of 38 patients who had hip arthroscopy for a labral tear (2) a hip cheilectomy study of 10 patients who had a cheilectomy for anterior femoroacetabular impingement and (3) an idiopathic arthritis study of 200 consecutive patients having THA. In all three studies, a common etiology was identified. Repetitive anterior femoroacetabular impingement resulted in anterior groin pain, labral tears, chondral damage and eventually arthritis. This impingement was caused by a pistol-grip deformity of the proximal femur in 97% of the cases in the arthroscopic labral study and 100% of the cases in the idiopathic arthritis study. The identification of anterior hip impingement as a cause of labral tears and idiopathic arthritis may allow surgeons to correct it early in its natural history and delay or prevent end-stage arthritis.     

Patient Satisfaction after Arthroscopic Repair of Acetabular Labral Tears

Background

Acetabular labral tear is a main cause of hip pain and disability, often requiring surgical treatment. Improvements of hip arthroscopic technique have produced positive outcomes after labral repair with arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction after arthroscopic repair of acetabular labral tear.

Methods

We interviewed 21 patients (10 men and 11 women; mean age, 36 years [range, 22 to 57 years]) with acetabular labral tears that had been repaired arthroscopically in terms of satisfaction of the procedure. In addition, clinical outcome was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index, and Harris hip score, and radiologic outcome was assessed using serial radiography. The patients were followed for 24-50 months.

Results

The mean Harris hip score was 73 points (range, 64 to 84 points) preoperatively and 83 points (range, 66 to 95 points) postoperatively. Fifteen hips (71%) were rated excellent and good. The mean WOMAC osteoarthritis index and VAS scores were improved at final follow-up. UCLA activity at the latest follow-up improved in 16 patients. The Tonnis grade of osteoarthritis at the latest follow-up did not change in all patients. Eighteen of the patients (86%) were satisfied with the procedure.

Conclusions

High rate of satisfaction after arthroscopic repair of acetabular labral tears is an encouraging outcome. Arthroscopic treatment of labral tears might be a useful technique in patients with hip pathologies, such as femoroacetabular impingement with labral tears.     

Arthroscopic treatment for symptomatic bilateral cam-type femoroacetabular impingement

Arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty improves clinical outcome in patients with unilateral cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and pathological similarities in patients who have had bilateral arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasy for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. The study group included 82 patients who had sequential bilateral hip arthroscopies for symptomatic cam-type femoroacetabular impingement with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. All patients had bilateral restricted hips at presentation. We differentiated between patients who had bilateral painful hips and those with unilateral pain at presentation. Scores and surgical findings were compared between the 2 study groups and between bilateral surgeries in each group. Pre- and postoperative Modified Harris Hip Scores and Non-Arthritic Hip Scores were undertaken prospectively by an independent observer. Mean patient age at the first surgery was 29 years (range, 14-63 years). The average time difference between arthroscopies was 5 months (range, 0.3-30 months). Postoperative scores improved significantly in both study groups in the first and second (contralateral) surgeries. Intra-articular pathologies between sides were linearly correlated for both groups. The time interval between surgeries had a linear correlation to age, reverse correlation to chondral damage, and reverse correlation to postoperative scores at the first surgery. Our results suggest that symptomatic patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement have similar accompanied pathologies on both sides and can benefit from sequential arthroscopic osteochondroplasty.     

Patients’ Characteristics Can Predict Clinical Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy by Reflecting the Patterns of Labral Tears: A Retrospective Observational Study

PurposeTo evaluate the relationship between morphological differences in labral tears and clinical features of the hip joint in patients who underwent hip arthroscopy.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of labral tears. Hip labral tears were morphologically classified as longitudinal peripheral tears (group L), radial fibrillated tears (group FI), radial flaps (group FL), and an unstable labrum (group U). Radiographically, the center–edge angle, acetabular roof obliquity, vertical-center-anterior angle, alpha angle, femoral head-neck offset ratio, and crossover sign were evaluated and compared among the groups. The relationship between labral morphology and these radiographic findings, as well as clinical findings, such as age, gender, preoperative range of hip motion, and the clinical outcomes using modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) were also examined.ResultsThis study included fifty patients. Groups L and FI were often observed in late middle-aged patients with relatively shallow acetabular coverage. Group FL tears were frequently observed in young males with radiographic features, such as femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), compared to the other groups. Group U comprised mostly young females with relatively shallow acetabular coverage compared to the other groups. For the postoperative mHHS, group FL showed the best score among all groups, with a significant difference between groups FL and FI (p = 0.034).ConclusionsOur study revealed that morphologically, different labral tears were associated with different clinical features and radiological findings. Especially, our study can provide predictive findings for hip arthroscopists that younger males with FAI show better clinical outcomes when compared to middle-aged females with shallow acetabulum, which is indicative of degenerative hip labral tears.Level of evidenceIV case series.     

Timing in hip arthroscopy: does surgical timing change clinical results?

Purpose

To our knowledge, there is no report in the orthopaedic literature that correlates the duration of hip pain with the results of hip arthroscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) with patient satisfaction in a prospective study over a two year period.

Methods

We present a prospective single-surgeon series of 525 consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for a labral tear, femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), or a chondral lesion. Modified HHS was recorded for all patients at the time of surgery and at six weeks, six months and one, two and three years after hip arthroscopy. At the time of surgery, patients were divided into three groups based on duration of preoperative symptoms: group A, under 6 months; group B, six months to three years; group C, over three years.

Results

Mean age was 39 years. There were significantly better outcomes for patients who underwent surgery within six months of symptom onset compared with those who waited longer. Patients who had symptoms for over 3 years by the time of surgery had a significantly poorer result than those with a shorter symptom duration and a higher chance of requiring revision surgery.

Conclusions

We recommend that patients with a diagnosis of labral tear, FAI or a chondral lesion should undergo hip arthroscopic surgery within six months of symptom onset. Patients with persistent symptoms for over three years should be made aware of the poorer outcome after hip arthroscopy.     

Editorial Commentary: When Enough Is Enough—Orthopaedic Procedures With Long Learning Curves and the Case of Hip Arthroscopy

The incidence of hip arthroscopy is increasing over time, as is the rate of labral repairs performed by American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery candidates in general and by sports medicine fellowship-trained candidates in particular. However, both arthroscopic labral debridement and repair yield excellent minimum 10-year outcomes in well-selected femoroacetabular impingement patients. In my practice, most hip arthroscopy patients undergo labral repair, and labral reconstruction is performed in about 4%, so I view the rising use of labral repair as a step forward. But concerns remain. How many of these American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery candidates will be able to hone their arthroscopic skills (and clinical judgment) in anywhere near the number of cases needed to achieve demonstrably low reoperation rates? In addition, will these fledgling surgeons be able to perform labral reconstructions or augmentations when indicated, bearing in mind that only half of such cases could be predicted preoperatively? The definition of adequate hip arthroscopy training remains up for grabs.     

Treatment of failed arthroscopic acetabular labral debridement by femoral chondro-osteoplasty: a case series of five patients

Femoroacetabular impingement is recognised as being a cause of labral tears and chondral damage. We report a series of five patients who presented with persistent pain in the hip after arthroscopy for isolated labral debridement. All five had a bony abnormality consistent with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. They had a further operation to correct the abnormality by chondro-osteoplasty of the femoral head-neck junction. At a mean follow-up of 16.3 months (12 to 24) all had symptomatic improvement.     

Editorial Commentary: Hip Arthroscopy—A Microcosm in the Evolution of Arthroscopy in Sports Medicine

Hip arthroscopy represents a microcosm in the evolution of arthroscopy within sports medicine. It has evolved right before our eyes over a condensed time frame with current-day techniques in arthroscopy and concepts in sports medicine. Early on, arthroscopy identified labral tears and other painful problems that had previously gone unrecognized and untreated because open procedures were rarely performed for these poorly defined conditions. The evolution of hip arthroscopy changed when femoroacetabular impingement was described and open surgical procedures were used for treatment. Open procedures for the hip, like the knee and shoulder before it, then evolved to less invasive arthroscopic methods. Techniques, technology, and understanding of hip disorders have all evolved simultaneously, resulting in a quickly changing landscape in the role of arthroscopy. And an improved focus has been gained on disorders other than femoroacetabular impingement that can lead to hip problems. This evolution is not novel because we have seen it in other joints, as well as among other general surgical procedures; most important, this evolution is not complete. Miles to go before we sleep.     

Editorial Commentary: Labral Calcification in the Setting of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: The Gratification of Eradication and Treatment of the Problem

Acetabular labral calcifications are occasionally encountered during hip arthroscopy for labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement. Clinical outcomes after removal of this calcification and repair of labral tearing have been shown to be good. Since these are found in asymptomatic patients, the labral repair and treatment of femoroacetabular impingement seem to be more important than removal of the calcification. However, amorphous calcium deposits need to be distinguished from the more serious conditions of labral ossification or rim fractures, which require significant preoperative planning and patient counseling. Labral reconstruction or rim fixation will alter the surgical procedure and potentially the postoperative rehabilitation.     

Editorial Commentary: Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Adolescents Improves Outcomes: Don’t Forget the Young Guns

It has been said that youth is wasted on the young. This notion does not apply to the value that hip arthroscopy provides in managing hip pathology in adolescents. Multiple studies have shown the efficacy of hip arthroscopy as a treatment modality in the adult population for a multitude of hip pathologies, particularly femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. The implementation of hip arthroscopy in the management of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in the adolescent population is on the rise. More studies illustrating favorable outcomes following hip arthroscopy in adolescents will serve to reinforce its utility as a treatment option for this population. Early intervention and preservation of hip function are of critical importance in a youthful and active patient population. As a word of caution, acetabular retroversion predisposes these patients to an increased risk of revision surgery.     

Hip–Spine Syndrome in the Nonarthritic Patient

Hip–spine syndrome refers to concurrent hip and spine pathology with overlapping symptoms. Most of the literature has studied it in relation to total hip arthroplasty literature and has been shown to increase dislocation risk. Lumbar spine and pelvic mobility have been studied less frequently in relation to nonarthritic pathologic hip states. Understanding the biomechanical relationship between the lumbar spine, pelvis, and hip can help elucidate how hip–spine syndrome affects the nonarthritic hip and how it impacts outcomes of hip arthroscopy. Changes in lumbar spine motion may be the reason certain predisposed patients develop symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or ischiofemoral impingement. Some athletes may be “hip users” with a low pelvic incidence, making them more reliant on hip motion due to less-intrinsic lumbopelvic motion. When these patients have FAI morphology, their increased reliance on hip motion makes them prone to experiencing femoroacetabular contact and concurrent symptoms. Other athletes may be “spine users,” with larger pelvic incidence and more baseline lumbopelvic motion, making them less reliant on hip motion and therefore less prone to experiencing hip impingement even with hip FAI morphology. Hip–spine syndrome also appears to have an impact on patient selection, role of nonoperative treatment, and hip arthroscopy surgical outcomes. Identifying patients with concurrent pathology may allow surgeons to recommend targeted physical therapy or counsel patients better on their expectations after surgery.     

Editorial Commentary: Hip Arthroscopy Evolution and Causes of Failure

Hip arthroscopy use has grown as a result of expanding indications; improved imaging including higher resolution magnetic resonance imaging with stronger magnetic fields and the advent of 3-dimensional computed tomography revealing the nuances of hip joint morphology; increased specialized training; improvements in instruments and implants; a record of successful outcomes; and increased understanding of microinstability, focal acetabular undercoverage or occult dysplasia, indications for labral reconstruction and capsular plication, and, most of all, femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, the leading diagnosis for which hip arthroscopy is performed, in the orthopaedic community as well as the general medical and athletic communities. We now know that labral repair results in better outcomes than labral debridement, and evidence suggests that capsule closure leads to better long-term success. Osteoarthritis and its correlate, advanced age, result in inferior survivorship after hip arthroscopy, which is unsurprising; hip preservation surgery is not designed to treat irreparable cartilage damage. Association of female sex with hip arthroscopy failure requires additional investigation. More females undergo hip arthroscopy than males, and females initially present with greater disability. Females tend to have smaller alpha angles, greater femoral and acetabular anteversion, and lower center edge angles than males, consistent with increased prevalence of hip dysplasia. Thus surgeons indicating females for hip arthroscopy should be aware of atypical locations of cam lesions, borderline dysplasia, or ligamentous laxity, all of which must be appropriately respected at the time of surgery. With all of the improvements we have made in techniques, patient diagnosis and surgical indications, and our overall understanding of complex anatomy and a technically challenging surgery, we can speculate that our long-term survivorship will only improve. I await with interest the long-term outcomes we will see 10 years from today, with the addition of insight from patient-reported outcome measures to answer these questions with greater certainty.     

Editorial Commentary: Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes in Older Patients Can Equal Outcomes in Younger Patients With Proper Surgical Indications

Hip arthroscopy patients often present with clinical features that help broadly categorize them as the younger patient with femoroacetabular impingement, the microinstability- or instability-related patient, those patients with predominant peripheral compartment disease, and the older patient with femoroacetabular impingement plus peripheral compartment disease. Outcomes in older patients can equal outcomes in younger patients with proper surgical indications. Specifically, older hip arthroscopy patients do well in the absence of degenerative articular cartilage changes. Although some studies have suggested a potential for greater conversion rate to hip arthroplasty in an older age group, with proper patient selection, hip arthroscopy may lead to durable and significant improvements.