Osteoarthritis: current concepts in diagnosis and management

Most patients with osteoarthritis seek medical attention because of pain. The safest initial approach is to use a simple oral analgesic such as acetaminophen (perhaps in conjunction with topical therapy). If pain relief is inadequate, oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid-like products should be considered. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections may provide short-term pain relief in disease flares. Alleviation of pain does not alter the underlying disease. Attention must also be given to nonpharmacologic measures such as patient education, weight loss and exercise. Relief of pain and restoration of function can be achieved in some patients with early osteoarthritis, particularly if an integrated approach is used. Patients with advanced disease may eventually require surgery, which generally provides excellent results.     

Orthèses plantaires et gonarthrose : évaluation des effets biomécaniques et cliniques à partir d''une revue de la littérature

OBJECTIVE: To determine the biomechanical and clinical effectiveness of foot insoles in patients with knee osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature (Medline, Pascal and Embase) using the MESH words knee, and insole and plantar orthosis for the biomechanical part and osteoarthritis, and insole and plantar orthosis for the clinical part. Clinical studies were classified by 2 independent readers using the Jadad scale. RESULTS: Two biomechanical theories were found: the adduction moment theory, which explains the effect of heel wedging, and articular chain theory, which explains the effect of lateral wedged insoles. The clinical effect was explained more by an anti-algesic effect than an anatomic or functional effect: the treated group consumed fewer nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs than the placebo group for up to 2-years of treatment. Evidence is lacking because of methodological weakness and few clinical trials. The information on side effects is limited. DISCUSSION: Laterally wedged foot insoles are proposed for the treatment of knee medial compartment osteoarthritis. The clinical effect is probably limited, but the treatment may reduce the digestive and renal side effects of prolonged use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Foot insoles could be recommended in clinical practice despite the lack of evidence in comparing the effectiveness of other therapeutics in knee osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: Use of foot insoles is a nonpharmacologic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee medial compartment.     

Osteoarthritis: diagnosis and treatment

Osteoarthritis is a common degenerative disorder of the articular cartilage associated with hypertrophic bone changes. Risk factors include genetics, female sex, past trauma, advancing age, and obesity. The diagnosis is based on a history of joint pain worsened by movement, which can lead to disability in activities of daily living. Plain radiography may help in the diagnosis, but laboratory testing usually does not. Pharmacologic treatment should begin with acetaminophen and step up to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Exercise is a useful adjunct to treatment and has been shown to reduce pain and disability. The supplements glucosamine and chondroitin can be used for moderate to severe osteoarthritis when taken in combination. Corticosteroid injections provide inexpensive, short-term (four to eight weeks) relief of osteoarthritic flare-ups of the knee, whereas hyaluronic acid injections are more expensive but can maintain symptom improvement for longer periods. Total joint replacement of the hip, knee, or shoulder is recommended for patients with chronic pain and disability despite maximal medical therapy.     

Shoulder osteoarthritis: diagnosis and management

Osteoarthritis of the shoulder is a gradual wearing of the articular cartilage that leads to pain and stiffness. As the joint surface degenerates, the subchondral bone remodels, losing its sphericity and congruity. The joint capsule also becomes thickened, leading to further loss of shoulder rotation. This painful condition is a growing problem in the aging population. In most cases, diagnosis of degenerative joint disease of the shoulder can be made with careful history, physical examination, and radiography. The symptoms and degree of shoulder arthritis visible on radiography determine the best treatment option. Mild degenerative joint disease can be treated with physical therapy and over-the-counter anti-inflammatory medications such as acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. More advanced cases of osteoarthritis that are refractory to nonoperative management can be managed with corticosteroid injections. In severe cases, surgery is indicated. Surgical options include arthroscopic debridement, arthroscopic capsular release, and, in the most severe instances, hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty.     

Treatment of lateral epicondylitis

Lateral epicondylitis is a common overuse syndrome of the extensor tendons of the forearm. It is sometimes called tennis elbow, although it can occur with many activities. The condition affects men and women equally and is more common in persons 40 years or older. Despite the prevalence of lateral epicondylitis and the numerous treatment strategies available, relatively few high-quality clinical trials support many of these treatment options; watchful waiting is a reasonable option. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroid injections, ultrasonography, and iontophoresis with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs appear to provide short-term benefits. Use of an inelastic, nonarticular, proximal forearm strap (tennis elbow brace) may improve function during daily activities. Progressive resistance exercises may confer modest intermediate-term results. Evidence is mixed on oral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, mobilization, and acupuncture. Patients with refractory symptoms may benefit from surgical intervention. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy, laser treatment, and electromagnetic field therapy do not appear to be effective.     

Review of the selective COX-2 inhibitors celecoxib and rofecoxib: focus on clinical aspects

The selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors celecoxib and rofecoxib were designed to have similar efficacy but less gastrointestinal toxicity than traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Their efficacy has been demonstrated in the treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, postoperative dental pain and dysmenorrhea. These agents produce fewer endoscopic ulcers, symptomatic ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeds than traditional NSAIDs; although the absolute benefit is small and the gastropreserving effect is negated by concurrent use of low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular risk reduction. Nephrotoxicity and hyptertension remain concerns with COX-2 inhibitors, as they are with traditional NSAIDs. COX-2 inhibitors may be safe alternatives to traditional NSAIDs for patients with aspirin-sensitive asthma.     

Management of patellofemoral pain syndrome

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is the most common cause of knee pain in the outpatient setting. It is caused by imbalances in the forces controlling patellar tracking during knee flexion and extension, particularly with overloading of the joint. Risk factors include overuse, trauma, muscle dysfunction, tight lateral restraints, patellar hypermobility, and poor quadriceps flexibility. Typical symptoms include pain behind or around the patella that is increased with running and activities that involve knee flexion. Findings in patients with PFPS range from limited patellar mobility to a hypermobile patella. To confirm the diagnosis, an examination of the knee focusing on the patella and surrounding structures is essential. For many patients with the clinical diagnosis of PFPS, imaging studies are not necessary before beginning treatment. Radiography is recommended in patients with a history of trauma or surgery, those with an effusion, those older than 50 years (to rule out osteoarthritis), and those whose pain does not improve with treatment. Recent research has shown that physical therapy is effective in treating PFPS. There is little evidence to support the routine use of knee braces or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Surgery should be considered only after failure of a comprehensive rehabilitation program. Educating patients about modification of risk factors is important in preventing recurrence.     

Adhesive capsulitis: a review

Adhesive capsulitis is a common, yet poorly understood, condition causing pain and loss of range of motion in the shoulder. It can occur in isolation or concomitantly with other shoulder conditions (e.g., rotator cuff tendinopathy, bursitis) or diabetes mellitus. It is often self-limited, but can persist for years and may never fully resolve. The diagnosis is usually clinical, although imaging can help rule out other conditions. The differential diagnosis includes acromioclavicular arthropathy, autoimmune disease (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis), biceps tendinopathy, glenohumeral osteoarthritis, neoplasm, rotator cuff tendinopathy or tear (with or without impingement), and subacromial and subdeltoid bursitis. Several treatment options are commonly used, but few have high-level evidence to support them. Because the condition is often self-limited, observation and reassurance may be considered; however, this may not be acceptable to many patients because of the painful and debilitating nature of the condition. Nonsurgical treatments include analgesics (e.g., acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), oral prednisone, and intra-articular corticosteroid injections. Home exercise regimens and physical therapy are often prescribed. Surgical treatments include manipulation of the joint under anesthesia and capsular release.     

Nonarticular pain syndromes. Differentiating generalized, regional, and localized disorders.

Nonarticular pain syndromes, although not inherently crippling, can have significant impact on patients' comfort, daily activities, and job performance. These syndromes include fibromyalgia, bursitis, tendinitis, and localized myofascial pain syndromes. Although differentiating these conditions from one another may be difficult, early diagnosis and follow-up are important for determining appropriate treatment. Depending on the diagnosis, treatment may include use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, or corticosteroid injections; trigger-point desensitization therapy; physical therapy; and patient education.     

Alternative therapies for traditional disease states: osteoarthritis

Americans spend more on natural remedies for osteoarthritis than for any other medical condition. In treating osteoarthritis, glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate, two of the molecular building blocks found in articular cartilage, are the most commonly used alternative supplements. In randomized trials of variable quality, these compounds show efficacy in reducing symptoms, but neither has been shown to arrest progression of the disease or regenerate damaged cartilage. Although few clinical trials on S-adenosylmethionine exist, preliminary evidence indicates that it relieves pain to a degree similar to that of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs but with fewer side effects. Clinical trials of dimethyl sulfoxide offer conflicting results. Neither ginger nor cetyl myristoleate has proven clinical usefulness.     

Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness and tolerability of nimesulide versus rofecoxib taken once a day in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis

The treatment of osteoarthritis, a common degenerative joint disease, is focused on the relief of symptoms, mainly pain, and sometimes joint stiffness. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are considered the treatment of choice in cases where the pain cannot be reduced with acetaminophen. This trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of 2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs taken once daily to relieve the symptoms of osteoarthritis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of 2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, nimesulide versus rofecoxib, given once a day in patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: 114 patients with the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis were recruited in a randomized, double-blinded fashion, and they received a daily dose of either 300 mg of nimesulide retard or 25 mg of rofecoxib. The effectiveness was evaluated by means of: visual analog scale 0 to 10 cm measured at 0, 15, 30, and 45 minutes after the first dose and then after 2, 3, 15, and 30 days of continuous drug dosing. The quality of life was assessed by the scale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities on days 0, 15, and 30. The patients' opinions and that of the physicians were recorded at the end of the study. RESULTS: The 2 groups of patients were matched for race, sex, menopause status (for females), pathologic antecedents, the duration of osteoarthritis, and the history of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy; however, patients' affected knees could differ in the 2 treatments. The 2 drugs were equally effective in terms of overall improvement of pain and the quality of life; they were equally well tolerated. However, significant differences were found between the 2 drugs in favor of nimesulide in the relief of the pain on days 2, 3, and 30, and in the scale of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index on day 15 and 30. DISCUSSION: In this trial, both medications were effective in improving the pain and the quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis; however, nimesulide, compared with rofecoxib, was quicker in reducing the pain and was more effective on days 2, 3, and 30. Nimesulide was also superior in improving the quality of life after 30 days of treatment.     

Effects of repetitive shortwave diathermy for reducing synovitis in patients with knee osteoarthritis: an ultrasonographic study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Shortwave (SW) diathermy can be used to improve vascular circulation and reduce inflammation and pain for patients with osteoarthritis. However, reduction in synovial inflammation has never been explored. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether repetitive SW diathermy, using ultrasonographic examination, could reduce synovitis in patients with knee osteoarthritis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty subjects with 44 osteoarthritic knees participated in this study. Eleven subjects received SW, and 10 subjects received SW and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Nine subjects received no treatment and served as a control group. Synovial sac thickness superior, medial, and lateral to the patella was measured using ultrasonography. The sum of these 3 measurements was taken as the total synovial sac thickness. Subjects in the treatment groups underwent ultrasonographic examination before and after 10, 20, and 30 treatments, whereas control subjects underwent ultrasonographic examination before the experiment and then once every 2 or 3 weeks for a total of 3 follow-up measurements. RESULTS: After 10 SW diathermy treatments, the total synovial sac thickness in both treatment groups was significantly less than the initial thickness, and the synovial sac continued to become significantly thinner with 20 sessions of treatment. These observations were not made in the control subjects. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The results indicate that SW diathermy in patients with knee osteoarthritis can significantly reduce both synovial thickness and knee pain. Such reductions of synovial sac thickness and pain index continue over treatment sessions.     

Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections for knee osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis is a common but often difficult problem to manage in primary care. Traditional nonsurgical management, consisting of lifestyle modification, physical therapy and pharmacologic therapy (e.g., analgesics, anti-inflammatory medications), is often ineffective or leaves residual symptoms. Viscosupplementation is a newly available option for patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis that involves a series of intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid. The exact mechanism of action is unclear, although increasing the viscoelasticity of the synovial fluid appears to play a role. Clinical experience and studies of the two hyaluronic acid products available, hyaluronan and hylan G-F 20, are inconclusive but seem to indicate beneficial effects with minimal adverse reactions in a significant number of patients. The exact indications for viscosupplementation are still evolving, but it currently can be considered for use in patients who have significant residual symptoms despite traditional nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments. In addition, patients who are intolerant of traditional treatments (e.g., gastrointestinal problems related to anti-inflammatory medications) can be considered for these injections. Family physicians with the ability to perform intra-articular knee injections should consider them an option in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.     

Intra-articular injections for osteoarthritis of the knee

If usual medical measures fail to control the pain of knee osteoarthritis and allow the patient to cope with its symptoms, intra-articular injections of a corticosteroid, a hyaluronan, or both can be tried.     

Minimizing cardiovascular complications during the treatment of osteoarthritis

Individuals with osteoarthritis face an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease compared with age-matched control subjects. Both conditions share some common risk factors (eg, age, obesity, and hypertension) and the consequences or treatment of osteoarthritis may increase CV risk by impairing physical activity and exacerbating CV risk factors. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may have prothrombotic and/or hypertensive effects and a negative impact on renal function, all of which contribute to the increased risk of CV disease associated with these agents. The magnitude of these effects differs between agents and is, in part, determined by the relative balance of cyclo-oxygenase-1 or cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibition. To minimize risk of CV disease in patients with osteoarthritis taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physicians need to 1) monitor blood pressure and the new appearance or exacerbation of edema; 2) encourage lifestyle changes/nonpharmacologic treatments for pain/risk factor management; 3) choose the lowest effective dose of appropriate drug therapy to achieve adequate pain relief while minimizing CV risk; 4) change nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as needed to one with lower propensity to aggravate CV risk; and 5) modulate antihypertensive therapy and diuretic management as needed to maintain target blood pressure and weight.     

Symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis: paracetamol or NSAIDs?

The clinical management of osteoarthritis (OA) is today symptomatic, its main goals being relief of pain and improvement of function. Therapy should be multimodal and composed of non-pharmacological, pharmacological and, if necessary, surgical procedures. Paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are evidence-based drugs for the symptomatic relief of OA. Newly published comparative studies have shown that NSAIDs are more effective than paracetamol--in contrast to studies from the early 1990s. Some studies have documented that more severe pain and the presence of inflammation can predict better response from NSAIDs than from paracetamol; on the other hand other studies have not confirmed this. Patient preference studies have shown that patients favour NSAIDs, but up to 40% consider paracetamol at least as effective as NSAIDs. With regard to efficacy, safety and cost, the majority of new guidelines recommend paracetamol as a first-choice analgesic for patients with OA of the knee or hip, and the use of NSAIDs only in cases of inadequate effect of paracetamol and especially in the presence of inflammation. There is much evidence that OA is a phasic disease and it may be that NSAIDs are useful during identifiable periods of inflammatory activity and can be avoided at other times. The concept of the short-term use of NSAIDs during flares and the use of a simple analgesic in the long term seems to be the best variant for the majority of patients with optimal benefit/risk and cost-effectiveness.     

Diagnostic and therapeutic injection of the shoulder region

The shoulder is the site of multiple injuries and inflammatory conditions that lend themselves to diagnostic and therapeutic injection. Joint injection should be considered after other therapeutic interventions such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, and activity-modification have been tried. Indications for glenohumeral joint injection include osteoarthritis, adhesive capsulitis, and rheumatoid arthritis. For the acromioclavicular joint, injection may be used for diagnosis and treatment of osteoarthritis and distal clavicular osteolysis. Subacromial injections are useful for a range of conditions including adhesive capsulitis, subdeltoid bursitis, impingement syndrome, and rotator cuff tendinosis. Scapulothoracic injections are reserved for inflammation of the involved bursa. Persistent pain related to inflammatory conditions of the long head of the biceps responds well to injection in the region. The proper technique, choice and quantity of pharmaceuticals, and appropriate follow-up are essential for effective outcomes.     

Methodological reflections on 20 randomized clinical hydrotherapy trials in rheumatology

The aim of this study was to estimate the level of scientific evidence contributed by randomized clinical trials in rheumatologic indication of spa therapy. A literature search was made of computer data banks, with analysis of 20 randomized hydrotherapy trials. On the 20 identified randomized hydrotherapy trials, four were carried out double-blind; nine included a comparison of inter-groups evolution. The indications assessed are chronic low back pain, osteoarthritis of the knee and hip joints, osteoarthritis of fingers, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis arthritis. The results suggest durable, persisting improvement several months after balneological care, in accordance with the following evaluation criteria: pain, handicap, quality of life, consumption of analgesics and of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). It was concluded that randomized evaluations, demonstrating a beneficial and prolonged clinical effect of balneologic treatments, exist in respect of the main indications for rheumatologic hydrotherapy. These results acknowledge the medical help given by hydrotherapy within the aforesaid parameters, to which may be added a reduction of the adverse gastrointestinal events of NSAIDs. Evaluation needs to be continued to clarify the medical benefit offered by rheumatologic hydrotherapy.     

Choosing a skeletal muscle relaxant

Skeletal muscle relaxants are widely used in treating musculoskeletal conditions. However, evidence of their effectiveness consists mainly of studies with poor methodologic design. In addition, these drugs have not been proven to be superior to acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses support using skeletal muscle relaxants for short-term relief of acute low back pain when nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or acetaminophen are not effective or tolerated. Comparison studies have not shown one skeletal muscle relaxant to be superior to another. Cyclobenzaprine is the most heavily studied and has been shown to be effective for various musculoskeletal conditions. The sedative properties of tizanidine and cyclobenzaprine may benefit patients with insomnia caused by severe muscle spasms. Methocarbamol and metaxalone are less sedating, although effectiveness evidence is limited. Adverse effects, particularly dizziness and drowsiness, are consistently reported with all skeletal muscle relaxants. The potential adverse effects should be communicated clearly to the patient. Because of limited comparable effectiveness data, choice of agent should be based on side-effect profile, patient preference, abuse potential, and possible drug interactions.