A posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty shows condylar lift-off during deep knee bends

This prospective randomized study was done to examine whether any difference in presentation of condyler lift-off exists between posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties. Fluoroscopic analysis of flexion kinematics under weightbearing condition was done for 18 patients who had bilateral paired total knee arthroplasties. The posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized prostheses were from the same total knee arthroplasty series with comparable surface geometries and were implanted by one surgeon. At evaluation, five of 18 patients (28%) with posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties had condylar lift-off, compared with 12 of 18 patients (67%) with posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties. Consequently, a significant difference in its incidence was seen between the groups. Condylar lift-off in posterior-stabilized knees was observed at various flexion angles, and one knee in this group had lift-off laterally and medially at different flexion angles. These findings raise concern that the higher incidence of condylar lift-off in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty may lead to an increased wear rate of polyethylene associated with long-term prosthetic loosening.     

In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements

In vivo kinematic patterns were determined for subjects (patients participating in the study), having either a fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. While under fluoroscopic surveillance, subjects did normal gait and a deep knee bend. Video images were downloaded to a workstation computer and analyzed in three dimensions using an iterative model-fitting approach. Femorotibial contact paths for the medial and lateral condyles, axial rotation, and condylar lift-off were determined. During a deep knee bend, subjects having a posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty routinely experienced posterior femoral rollback of their lateral condyle and normal axial rotational patterns, whereas random subjects having a posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty experienced paradoxical anterior sliding and opposite axial rotational patterns. During gait, posterior-stabilized and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties experienced similar kinematic patterns, with the presence of paradoxical sliding and opposite axial rotational patterns. Subjects having posterior-stabilized and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties experienced condylar lift-off. Subjects having a posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty predominantly experienced lateral condylar lift-off whereas subjects with posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties experienced either medial or lateral condylar lift-off. Subjects having a posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty experienced significantly greater weightbearing range of motion.     

An algorithm for the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty.

The fate of the posterior cruciate ligament in primary total knee arthroplasty is controversial. An algorithmic approach is presented that is based on pathologic criteria for evaluating and treating patients with primary total knee arthroplasty that will aid in the posterior cruciate ligament decision-making process, producing more predictable procedures and outcomes. A consecutive series of the first 120 patients (171 knees) who had primary posterior cruciate-retaining arthroplasty and the first 120 patients (180 knees) who had primary posterior-stabilized arthroplasty with a minimum 5-year followup in which the Maxim Complete Total Knee System and the algorithmic approach were used were compared. No statistically significant differences in outcome between the groups were observed. Among the patients who had posterior cruciate-retaining arthroplasty, no revisions attributable to aseptic loosening have been reported at an average followup of 6.39 years. The average followup Knee Society total score was 162.16 points, with 91 (54.8%) knees having excellent outcome ratings. No revisions attributable to aseptic loosening have been reported among the patients who had posterior-stabilized arthroplasty at an average followup of 5.98 years. The average followup Knee Society total score was 158.05 points, with excellent outcome ratings reported in 96 (54.9%) knees. The use of a standardized algorithm has streamlined the treatment of patients having primary total knee arthroplasty, consistently providing excellent clinical results when either retaining or sacrificing the posterior cruciate ligament.     

Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components

BACKGROUND: Charnley total hip arthroplasty has been demonstrated to provide good clinical results and a high rate of implant survivorship for twenty years and longer. Most long-term series are not large enough to stratify the many demographic factors that influence implant survivorship. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of demographic factors and diagnoses on the long-term survivorship of the acetabular and femoral components used in Charnley total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Two thousand primary Charnley total hip arthroplasties (1689 patients) were performed at one institution from 1969 to 1971. Patients were contacted at five-year intervals after the arthroplasty. Twenty-five years after the surgery, 1228 patients had died and 461 patients were living. Hips that had not had a reoperation, revision or removal of a component for any reason, or revision or removal for aseptic loosening were considered to have survived. Survivorship data were calculated with use of the method of Kaplan and Meier. Patients were stratified by age, gender, and underlying diagnosis to determine the influence of these factors on implant survivorship. RESULTS: The twenty-five year rates of survivorship free of reoperation, free of revision or removal of the implant for any reason, and free of revision or removal for aseptic loosening were 77.5%, 80.9% and 86.5%, respectively. The twenty-five-year survivorship free of revision for aseptic loosening was poorer for each decade earlier in life at which the procedure was performed; this survivorship ranged from 68.7% for patients who were less than forty years of age to 100% for patients who were eighty years of age or older. Men had a twofold higher rate of revision for aseptic loosening than did women. CONCLUSIONS: Age, gender, and underlying diagnosis all affected the likelihood of long-term survivorship of the acetabular and femoral components used in Charnley total hip arthroplasty.     

Posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining total knee replacement: a randomized study.

A randomized controlled study was done to compare the clinical, radiographic, and quality of life outcomes between posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining primary total knee implants. One hundred forty-three patients were enrolled in the study. Patients ranged in age from 57 to 89 years, had a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis, and an intact functioning posterior cruciate ligament. Patients were excluded if they had a flexion contracture greater than 15 degrees, a varus deformity greater than 20 degrees, or a valgus deformity greater than 15 degrees. Patients were randomized to one of two study groups, posterior-stabilized AMK total knee implants (76 patients) or cruciate-retaining AMK total knee implants (67 patients). One hundred eight patients have had a minimum 2-year followup including 57 patients in the posterior-stabilized group and 51 patients in the cruciate-retaining group. Seventy-three patients have had a minimum 3-year followup including 37 patients in the posterior stabilized group and 36 patients in the cruciate-retaining group. The overall total Knee Society clinical rating score at 2 years averaged 157.1 points in the posterior-stabilized group and 156.5 points in the cruciate-retaining group. At 3 years, the scores averaged 156.8 points in the posterior-stabilized group and 163.5 points in the cruciate-retaining group. The range of motion component of the Knee Society score averaged 113.6 degrees for the posterior-stabilized group and 108.5 degrees for the cruciate-retaining group at 2 years, and 108.3 degrees in the cruciate-retaining group and 108.5 degrees in the posterior-stabilized group. Based on the various parameters analyzed, there were no notable differences between the groups with a posterior-stabilized and a cruciate-retaining total knee implant at 2 years. This trend seemed to be the same at 3 years.     

Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement

Clinical and radiographic analyses and survivorship were done on the initial cementless series of 309 posterior cruciate-retaining meniscal-bearing and rotating-platform New Jersey LCS total knee replacements followed up for 10 to 20 years (mean, 12.4 years). Clinical results in patients surviving at least 10 years using a strict knee scoring scale were similar for posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing designs. Good to excellent results were seen in 97.9% of primary posterior cruciate-retaining-bearing prostheses and in 97.9% of primary rotating-platform prostheses. Radiographic analysis of minimum 10-year followup radiographs showed generally stable fixation of all components with gross migration seen in one tibial component (0.6%) in a patient with a failed high tibial osteotomy. Significant osteolysis was present requiring bearing exchange and bone grating in three patients with cementless rotating-platform prostheses (1.8%) who had multiple knee surgeries at an average of 10.2 years from the index surgery. Survivorship of the primary cementless posterior cruciate-retaining meniscal-bearing prostheses with an end point of revision for any mechanical reason was 97.4% at 10 years and 83% at 16 years; using an end point of a poor clinical knee score, the survivorship was 98.9% at 10 and 16 years, respectively. Survivorship of the primary cementless rotating-platform prostheses with end points of revision for any mechanical reason or a poor clinical knee score was 98.3% survivorship at 10 and 18 years, respectively. In the current study, no cementless rotating-bearing patella loosened, fractured, or dissociated in patients without prior knee surgery although one cementless rotating-bearing patella (0.6%) in a patient who had multiple knee surgeries wore through the inferior marker wire after 10.8 years, causing metallosis that required revision.     

Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. A study of patients followed for a minimum of fifteen years

BACKGROUND: There have been a limited number of studies of total knee arthroplasties with durations of follow-up of fifteen years, but we are not aware of any involving modular fixed-bearing posterior cruciate-retaining prostheses. METHODS: A consecutive series of 139 total knee arthroplasties in 109 patients (average age, sixty-seven years), performed by one surgeon using a nonconforming posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis, was followed for fifteen years or longer. Forty-five patients (fifty-nine knees) were examined at a minimum of fifteen years postoperatively, fifty-seven patients (seventy knees) had died, five patients (eight knees) were too ill to return for assessment, and two patients (two knees) were considered lost to follow-up. The patients were assessed clinically with use of the Knee Society clinical rating system, and the knees were assessed radiographically. Survivorship analysis was performed with use of worst-case-scenario analysis and with failure defined as a reoperation for any reason. RESULTS: There were five reoperations, four of which were performed because of wear of the polyethylene insert. In addition, one loose cemented femoral component was revised at fifteen years. The survival rate without revision or a need for any reoperation was 92.6% at fifteen years. The mean Knee Society score and functional score at fifteen years were 96 and 78 points, respectively. The prevalence of radiolucent lines was 13%, with 2% around the femur, 11% around the tibia, and none around the patella. None of these lines were clinically relevant. There was no evidence of progressive radiolucent lines, and there was one case of asymptomatic femoral osteolysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-surgeon series, modular fixed-bearing posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties had good clinical and radiographic results with excellent survivorship for up to fifteen years. These results are comparable with those in long-term studies of posterior stabilized implants and of prostheses with mobile-bearing and nonmodular tibial inserts.     

Metal-backed patellar components: a brief report on 10-year survival.

Two hundred ninety-six total knee arthroplasties were performed with metal-backed patellar components in 206 patients with an average followup of 10 years. These total knee arthroplasties were reviewed retrospectively for survivorship, failure, and revision. There were 28 patellar component failures in 24 patients. Eighteen patellar components required revision. The average time to failure was 6.8 years. The average time to revision was 6.3 years. Survivorship analysis revealed .9662 survivorship at 5 years, which decreased to .8976 at 10 years, and .8641 at 14 years. These results do not compare favorably with the results of total knee arthroplasty with all-polyethylene patellar components. The use of metal-backed patellar components should be avoided.     

A comparative study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties. Ten-year survivorship

We have studied the long-term outcome of 408 primary medial St Georg Sled unicompartmental arthroplasties of the knee and 531 primary Kinematic total knee arthroplasties using survivorship analysis. The operations were performed by a number of surgeons under the supervision of two consultants at one orthopaedic centre. Prospective clinical assessment was carried out before and at 2, 5, 8, 10, 12 and 15 years after operation. Failure was defined as follows: revision or removal of the implant; the presence of moderate or severe pain; or 'worst-case' with all patients lost to follow-up. Cumulative survival rates at ten years were calculated using life tables. The follow-up rate was 97%. At ten years, 25 medial sled arthroplasties and 20 Kinematic knee arthroplasties had been revised. With revision or removal as the survivorship endpoint at ten years there was a success rate of 87.5% for the medial sled and 89.6% for the Kinematic knee arthroplasty. When moderate or severe pain was included these rates became 79.4% for both arthroplasties. There was no statistically significant (p > 0.05) difference between the rates of survival for the two arthroplasties using either of the endpoint criteria. Good or excellent results were recorded for 77.9% of the medial sled knees and 75.1% for the Kinematic knees. The former had 93.8% of cases with a final range of movement in excess of 90 degrees compared with 83.7% for the Kinematic knees (p < 0.01). We conclude that at a single orthopaedic centre in the UK, the St Georg Sled medial compartment arthroplasty for appropriate specific indications offers predictable survivorship at ten years which is comparable with that of the Kinematic total knee arthroplasty.     

Differences in articular track area of posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining retrieved total knee implants

Press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasties removed at revision surgery from 27 knees were examined. Fourteen of the implants were posterior-stabilized press-fit condylar systems and 13 were cruciate-retaining press-fit condylar systems. The articular track areas were examined using a digital camera and manual measurements. Findings revealed the track area in posterior-stabilized implants (93%) was larger than in cruciate-retaining implants (59%). Mean posterior distance ratio of the articular track from the posterior limit of the polyethylene was 2% (.08 cm) for posterior-stabilized implants versus 23% (.97 cm) for cruciate-retaining implants. No differences in wear rating were noted. The pattern of articular contact in cruciate-retaining knees demonstrated little migration of the femoral contact surface across the tibial polyethylene plateau.     

Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years and younger

Because the young patient with a total hip arthroplasty is presumed to place increased demands on a reconstruction for a longer period than the average patient with a hip replacement, long-term results are expected to be inferior. To determine the efficacy of total hip replacements in this population, the current authors reviewed the long-term results of patients who were 50 years and younger who had cementless total hip arthroplasties at their institution, and reviewed the literature on total hip arthroplasty in younger patients. The results from the study population and the literature were encouraging. At the author's institute, during the past 20 years, 561 hip replacements were done on 488 patients in this age group, using extensively porous-coated cobalt-chromium stems matched with beaded, press-fit acetabular components of cobalt-chrome or titanium. Using the Kaplan-Meier technique, the survival rates for femoral and acetabular components, using any revision as an end point, were 89% at 10-year followup and 60% at 15-year followup. A subset of the authors' patients who were 40 years and younger (256 hips, 223 patients) had slightly inferior results, with 85% 10-year survivorship and 54% 15-year survivorship, using any revision as an end point. A comprehensive literature review also showed that long-term success can be achieved with cemented or cementless total hip arthroplasties in young patients. Because some reconstructions exhibited inferior results in younger patients, the authors recommend that surgeons be much more critical of the components used in these patients and allow long-term data to guide their decisions.     

Advantage of Minimal Anterior Knee Pain and Long-term Survivorship of Cemented Single Radius Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty without Patella Resurfacing

BackgroundThe single radius total knee prosthesis was introduced with the advantage of reduced patellar symptoms; however, there is no long-term follow-up study of the same. The purpose of this study was to determine the survival rate of single radius posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty and patellofemoral complication rates in a consecutive series.MethodsSeventy-one patients (103 knees) who underwent arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing using a single radius posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis were followed up for a minimum 10 years. Clinical evaluation using Knee Society knee and function scores and radiologic evaluation were performed at regular intervals. Anterior knee pain as well as patellofemoral complications were evaluated with a simple questionnaire. The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to estimate survival.ResultsSeventeen patients (23 knees) were excluded due to death (12 knees) or lost to follow-up (11 knees). Of the 80 knees enrolled, all femoral components and 78 tibial components were well fixed without loosening at final follow-up. Two revisions were performed because of tibial component loosening and periprosthetic joint infection. One patient with tibial component loosening refused to have revision surgery. No obvious tibial insert polyethylene wear was observed. The survivorships at 132 months were 96.7% using revision or pending revision as end points. Anterior knee pain was present in 6 patients (6 knees, 7.5%) at the latest follow-up. No patellofemoral complication requiring revision was encountered.ConclusionsThe single radius posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis demonstrated an excellent minimum 10-year survivorship. The low rates of implant loosening and 7.5% of anterior knee pain as a patellofemoral complication are comparable with those reported for other modern total knee prosthesis.     

Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements.

Clinical results of the initial cemented and cementless series of 373 New Jersey Low Contact Stress total knee replacements in 282 patients surviving at least 10 years were analyzed using a strict knee scoring scale. The study showed excellent, good, fair, or poor results in 68.1%, 29.8%, 2.1%, or 0% of primary posterior cruciate-retaining meniscal bearing knee replacements, 46.7%, 53.3%, 0%, or 0% results in primary cemented rotating platform knee replacements, and 68.1%, 29.8%, 2.1%, or 0% results in primary cementless rotating platform knee replacements, respectively. Radiographic evaluation at minimum 10-year followup showed stable fixation of all components, no gross migration but significant osteolysis requiring bearing exchange and bone grafting in three cementless rotating platform knee replacements (1.8%) in three patients who underwent previous surgeries at an average of 10.2 years from the index surgery. Survivorship of the patients who underwent primary cementless posterior cruciate-retaining meniscal bearing knee replacements with an end point of revision for any mechanical reason was 97.4% at 10 years and 83% at 16 years; using an end point of a poor clinical knee score the survivorship was 98.9% at 10 years and at 16 years. Survivorship of the patients who underwent primary cemented rotating platform knee replacements with end points of revision for any mechanical reason or a poor clinical knee score was 97.7% at 10 years and at 20 years. Survivorship of the patients who underwent cementless rotating platform knee replacements with end points of revision for any mechanical reason or a poor clinical knee score was 98.3% at 10 years and at 18 years.     

Constraint in primary total knee arthroplasty

Instability is an important cause of failure following total knee arthroplasty. Increasing component constraint may reduce instability, but doing so also can cause increased forces to be transmitted to fixation and implant interfaces, which may lead to premature aseptic loosening. Constraint is defined as the effect of the elements of knee implant design that provides the stability needed to counteract forces about the knee after arthroplasty in the presence of a deficient soft-tissue envelope. Determining the amount of constraint necessary can be challenging. Most primary total knee arthroplasties are performed for knees without substantial deformity or the need for difficult ligament balancing; in these cases, either a posterior-stabilized or a posterior cruciate-retaining design is appropriate. In certain situations, such as patients with prior patellectomies, rheumatoid arthritis, or substantial preoperative deformities, a posterior-stabilized knee may be favored. With their large posts, varus-valgus constrained implants typically are reserved for patients with substantial coronal plane instability, which is difficult to balance with a posterior-stabilized or cruciate-retaining implant alone. Rotating-hinge knee implants usually are recommended for patients with severe deformity or instability that cannot be managed with a varus-valgus implant.