Term breech and long-term morbidity -- cesarean section versus vaginal breech delivery

STUDY: Perinatal morbidity and mortality of term fetuses have been discussed extensively both for vaginal breech delivery and cesarean section. However, information regarding long-term morbidity and psychomotoric development of these children are scarce. DESIGN: Data of 154 children delivered after breech presentation at our institution between 1988 and 1994 were analyzed using a specific, standardized questionnaire (Enzephalopathiefragebogen, Meyer-Probst) with emphasis on psychomotoric development and skills. Hyperkinetic disorders, social adaptation, emotional instability, and intelligence were evaluated as subcategories and compared to perinatal data. RESULTS: pO(2) and base excess (BE) in the umbilical artery were lower in the vaginal group. pH, body weight and placental weight showed no difference between groups. Psychomotoric development and skills did not differ between children delivered vaginally or abdominally. Perinatal variables did not allow a prediction of long-term morbidity. CONCLUSION: Route of delivery has negligible influence on the measured values in the umbilical artery and no influence on long-term morbidity of fetuses presenting breech.     

Assisted vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in breech presentation

BACKGROUND: The Term Breech Trial (TBT), a well-known study conducted by Hannah and published in the Lancet, revealed a better outcome for neonates after primary caesarean section compared with attempted vaginal delivery. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the results of TBT have to be taken into account when counseling pregnant women in central Europe. METHODS: We investigated 882 women who had delivered infants in breech presentation over a period of 11 years. The neonates had a birthweight of >2500 g and no malformations. We compared mortality and serious neonatal morbidity after attempted vaginal delivery and after primary caesarean section. RESULTS: No infant or maternal mortality was registered in either group. Serious neonatal morbidity was higher (0.5%; n = 2) for attempted vaginal delivery than for primary caesarean section; in the latter group, no child fulfilled the criteria for serious neonatal morbidity. However, the difference was not statistically significant. As expected, after attempted vaginal delivery, the base excess, and 5-min APGAR scores were indicative of more markedly depressed children. CONCLUSION: After careful exclusion of risk factors and informing the patient in detail about the risks and possible complications, vaginal delivery from breech presentation is still warrantable.     

Vaginal breech delivery or cesarean section.

In 579 singleton breech deliveries the total perinatal mortality rate was 10.4% and the corrected perinatal mortality rate was 0.67%. There were 452 babies delivered vaginally (78.1%) and 127 delivered by cesarean section (21.9%). The perinatal mortality rate was very high in the premature breech delivery and in the low-birth-weight infant. Cesarean section should be used to avoid a traumatic vaginal delivery and it should be used more liberally in the mature breech, but it is unlikely that cesarean section rates in excess of 50% will significantly reduce the perinatal mortality mortality rate. More information is required as to whether extending the indications for cesarean section in the low-birth-weight infant will further reduce the perinatal mortality rate.     

Factors associated with successful vaginal delivery after cesarean section

To assess obstetric parameters that would predict successful vaginal delivery in patients with prior cesarean sections, the perinatal records of 579 such patients were reviewed. Sixty-six percent of the patients (385) had elective repeat cesarean sections. Of the 194 patients who attempted vaginal delivery, three-fourths (148) had success. Perinatal parameters that were statistically significant indicators of success included: nonrecurrent indication for cesarean section, vaginal delivery either prior or subsequent to cesarean section, duration of labor less than 24 hours prior to cesarean section, infant's birth weight less than 4,000 gm and cervical dilatation greater than 4 cm on admission for attempted vaginal delivery.     

Outcomes of term vaginal breech delivery

In December 2001, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists revised their recommendations for breech delivery. These recommendations acknowledge that although a planned vaginal delivery may no longer be appropriate, there are instances in which vaginal breech delivery is inevitable. Moreover, there continues to be patients who for any number of reasons will choose vaginal over cesarean delivery when faced with a fetus in the breech presentation. We sought to review maternal and fetal outcomes in such circumstances when vaginal breech delivery occurs, and compare these outcomes to elective cesarean deliveries for breech presentation. We performed a retrospective review of all singleton breech deliveries at our county hospital from January 2002 through June 2003. We reviewed maternal age, ethnicity, gestational age, gravity, parity, birthweight, mode of delivery, Apgar scores, umbilical arterial blood gases, and maternal and infant complications of both cesarean deliveries and vaginal breech deliveries. Univariate and logistic regression statistical analyses were performed with NCSS software. We had a total of 150 term breech deliveries with gestational ages between 37 and 42 weeks. Of these, 41 were vaginal breech and 109 were cesarean deliveries. Greater than 95% of patients are of Hispanic origin. There were no statistically significant differences in maternal age, ethnicity, gravity, or gestational age. Mean birthweight was significantly lower and parity was significantly higher in the vaginal delivery group. There was also a higher proportion of patients who underwent labor induction/augmentation in the vaginal group. We found no differences in the outcomes of 5-minute Apgar scores, umbilical arterial blood gas values, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, deaths or maternal/fetal complications reported between the two groups. Mean umbilical arterial blood gas values were greater than 7.18 in both groups. Vaginal breech delivery cannot always be avoided. Moreover, at our county hospital several patients continue to choose vaginal breech delivery. Our data would suggest that vaginal breech delivery remains a viable option in selected patients.     

Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to evaluate the perinatal mortality and morbidity of deliveries with fetuses presenting by the breech comparing outcomes of two groups according to mode of delivery: vaginal and cesarean section. RESULTS: Of 756 fetuses studied, 271 were delivered vaginally and 485 by cesarean section. In infants weighing > or = 1500 grams, "further corrected" mortality and morbidity rates were low and similar for both delivery routes: one neonatal death (NNM) in each. Among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (< 1500 grams) the "further corrected" mortality rate was higher in the vaginal group: 57.4%, and 18.0% in abdominal deliveries (odds ratio [OR] = 6.1, 95% CI: 3.1 to 12.1). Likewise, rate of depression at five minutes were higher in the vaginal group (p < 0.001). However, the average fetal weight among the vaginal deliveries VLBW (787 grams) was 250 grams less than in the cesarean section group (1040 grams). After adjustment for fetal weight, gestational age, and other prognostic variables the odds ratio for neonatal death was no longer statistically significant (adjusted OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 0.9 to 5.2, p = 0.105). Comparison of planned vaginal delivery with elective cesarean section yielded smaller differences (adjusted OR for neonatal death = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.6 to 2.9, p = 0.525). CONCLUSION: The poor perinatal outcomes of breech delivered infants are due primarily to VLBW, congenital malformations, and premature labor. Although abdominal delivery had a lower NNM rate than vaginal delivery, the difference was not significant after adjustment for confounding factors. The results confirm the findings of a previously analyzed similar series delivered at our institution between 1980 and 1987. They suggest that, with appropriate technique, abdominal delivery is not mandatory in breech presentation.     

Attempted vaginal versus planned cesarean delivery in 195 breech first twin pregnancies

BACKGROUND: To compare neonatal and maternal outcomes for breech first twins according to whether vaginal or cesarean delivery was planned and to verify that in appropriate selected cases, attempted vaginal delivery is a reasonable choice. METHODS: A retrospective study of all twin pregnancies with the first twin in breech position and gestational age at least 35 weeks at birth at two French university hospital centers from January 1994 through December 2000. The primary outcome was a combined indicator of neonatal mortality and severe morbidity, as defined by one or more of the following: death before discharge, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, 5-minute Apgar score <7, cord blood pH <7.10, or birth trauma. RESULTS: Cesarean delivery was planned for 71 (36.4%) patients, and attempted vaginal delivery for 124 (63.6%), 59 (47.6%) of whom were delivered vaginally and 65 (52.4%) by cesarean during labor. Neither the combined negative outcome indicator nor neonatal mortality differed significantly for either twin or either group. There were no significant differences in maternal mortality or morbidity between the two groups. The frequency of deep vein thrombophlebitis or pulmonary embolism requiring anticoagulant therapy was significantly higher in the planned cesarean group [3/71 (4.2%) versus 0/124; p=0.047]. CONCLUSION: When appropriate criteria are used to decide mode of delivery, a careful intrapartum protocol is followed, and an experienced obstetrician, midwife, and anesthesiologist are in attendance, attempted vaginal delivery is a reasonable option for first twins in breech position.     

Vaginal versus cesarean section oriented approaches in the management of breech delivery

In a 5-year retrospective study, 543 singleton breech presented infants weighing more than 1000 g were reviewed in two obstetric departments. Department "A" actively conducted the labor with lower cesarean section rate (26%). Department "B" attempted a trial of labor with less invasive procedures and performed more cesarean sections (38% P less than 0.05 S). The management of labor, fetal and maternal outcome were compared between the two departments. Both vaginal and abdominal routes of delivery in fetuses weighing more than 1500 g resulted in the same fetal and maternal outcome. For fetuses weighing 1000-1500 g cesarean section is probably the recommended delivery route.     

Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: vaginal versus repeat cesarean section

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the peripartum outcome of women weighing >300 pounds (135 kg) who were candidates for trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: All pregnant women who weighed in excess of 300 pounds and had a prior cesarean delivery were included in this prospective investigation. Student t test, chi(2) analysis, or Fisher exact tests were used. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. P <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: During a 2-year period, 69 patients met the inclusion criteria; 39 (57%) underwent an elective repeat cesarean delivery, and 30 (43%) women attempted a vaginal delivery after prior cesarean delivery. The demographics of age, race, gravidity, maternal weight, and preexisting medical conditions were similar for the two groups. Vaginal birth after prior cesarean delivery occurred in 13% (4/30). Reasons for failure included a labor arrest disorder in 46%, fetal distress in 38%, and failed induction in 15%. The rates of endometritis and wound breakdown were higher in the women undergoing trial of labor (30% and 23%, respectively) than in those undergoing repeat elective cesarean delivery (20% and 8%). The combined infectious morbidity rate was significantly higher for women attempting trial of labor (53%) than those undergoing elective repeat cesarean delivery (28%; odds ratio 1.78, 95% confidence intervals 1.05, 3.02). CONCLUSION: The success rate for a vaginal delivery in the morbidly obese woman with a prior cesarean delivery is less than 15%, and more than half of the patients undergoing a trial of labor have infectious morbidity.     

Delivery of the macrosomic infant: cesarean section versus vaginal delivery

The macrosomic fetus of a diabetic woman faces increased risk for injury at the time of birth. Cesarean section offers the potential for avoiding trauma to the fetus, but can result in increased morbidity in the mother as compared to vaginal delivery. In this article, the advantages and disadvantages of the 2 routes of delivery for the overgrown fetus of a diabetic mother are discussed. In addition, methods for diagnosing macrosomia by ultrasound are examined, along with the benefits and pitfalls of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation in the setting of diabetes. Finally, management approaches for selecting route of delivery for the macrosomic fetus are described and analyzed.     

Relation of steroids and prostaglandin at vaginal delivery and cesarean section.

The simultaneous determination of estradiol, estrone, progesterone, and prostaglandins E and F has been made in fetal and maternal compartments in patients with and without the onset of labor. The decidua rather than the fetus or placenta was considered to be the site of prostaglandin synthesis, and prostaglandins present in the amniotic fluid during labor were thought to be a byproduct by myometrial activity rather than the factor initiating the onset of labor. Progesterone levels in the maternal plasma were lower during labor but estradiol levels were elevated. It was concluded that the steroid environment may contribute to the clinical course of labor by facilitating the local uterine production of prostaglandins. Whereas estradiol was high and estrone low in maternal circulation, the ratio was reversed in the fetus. This reversal may serve to protect the fetus from high maternal levels of estradiol.     

Uterine tocolysis at cesarean breech delivery with epidural anesthesia

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of ritodrine and nitroglycerin for uterine relaxation during cesarean section with a breech-presenting fetus, performed under nongeneral anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of all breech singletons delivered by cesarean section under epidural anaesthesia in a two-year period. The study groups consisted of those who received ritodrine and those who received nitroglycerin. A group who received no relaxant served as a comparison group. The interval from uterine incision to delivery was recorded, and comparisons for potential complications of the medications included maternal changes in pulse and blood pressure, blood loss, and changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit. Fetal outcomes that were evaluated included five-minute Apgar score, cord pH and any recorded birth trauma. Statistical significance was set at P = .05. The Student t test, Yates's correlation for chi 2, Fisher's exact test and ANOVA were used as appropriate. RESULTS: The three groups had similar demographic characteristics. There was no significant difference in the uterine incision to delivery interval between the groups. In three cases the uterine incision to delivery interval was prolonged (> 5 minutes) in the nitroglycerin group, six cases in the ritodrine group and three in the comparison group (P = .002). There was no case of serious maternal morbidity or mortality, and no patient required a blood transfusion. The three groups had similar estimated blood loss, changes in maternal heart rate and systolic blood pressure intraoperatively and fall in hemoglobin and hematocrit 24 hours postoperatively. Neonatal outcome was similar among the three groups, and there was no case of neonatal birth trauma or intrapartum death. Cord blood analysis was similar in the three groups. One of the seven infants weighing < 1,500 g died within one hour of birth. CONCLUSION: Ritodrine and nitroglycerine are safe agents for use at cesarean breech delivery with epidural anesthesia and may be considered for uterine relaxation when a traumatic delivery is anticipated or encountered. Our results do not support the use of these tocolytics for "routine" cesarean breech delivery.     

Variables associated with successful vaginal birth after one cesarean section: a proposed vaginal birth after cesarean section score

The objective of this study was to define the variables associated with vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) and to develop a scoring system for the prediction of successful VBAC. We searched our computerized database for parturients with a history of one low-transverse cesarean section (CS) who were delivered during the year 2000. Variables were categorized according to the time period in which they were obtained: (1) first prenatal visit, (2) at the onset of labor, and (3) during labor. Univariate and multiple stepwise logistic regression models were fitted to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Of the 475 parturients with a history of one previous CS, 136 underwent elective CS and 339 underwent a trial of VBAC, of whom 82% were successful. Of the variables that can be obtained at the onset of labor, five were significantly associated with successful VBAC: abnormal presentation as the indication for the primary CS (OR, 7.4; 95% CI 2.8 to 19.2), a previous VBAC (OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 2.1 to 24.8), cervical dilation (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.9), gestational age < or = 41 weeks (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.1), and lower gestational age at the primary CS (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.4). In the proposed VBAC score, each of the four most significant variables was assigned a score ranging between 0 and 3 based on the probability for VBAC. A score < or = 2 was associated with a success rate of 42%, a score between 3 and 6 was associated with a rate of 81%, and a score between 7 and 10 was associated with a 98% successful VBAC rate (p < 0001). The proposed VBAC score may help obstetricians when counseling their patients regarding the individual likelihood of a successful VBAC.     

Maternal and neonatal copeptin levels at cesarean section and vaginal delivery

Objective

The objective of the study was to measure the copeptin levels in maternal serum and umbilical cord serum at cesarean section and vaginal delivery in normotensive pregnancy and pre-eclamptic women.

Study design

This was a prospective study at Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt. Ninety cases were included. They were divided into six groups: (1) normal pregnancy near term, as a control group, (2) primiparas who had vaginal delivery, (3) primiparas who had vaginal delivery and mild preeclampsia, (4) elective repeat cesarean section, (5) intrapartum cesarean section for indications other than fetal distress, and (6) intrapartum cesarean section for fetal distress. Serum copeptin concentrations were quantified with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Mean, standard deviation, and paired t-test were used to test for significant change in quantitative data.

Results

The vaginal delivery groups had higher levels of maternal serum copeptin than the elective cesarean section group (P < 0.01). Higher maternal serum copeptin levels were found in cases with pre-eclampsia as compared with the normotensive cases. The maternal copeptin levels during intrapartum cesarean section were higher than that during elective repeat cesarean section. There was a significant correlation between maternal copeptin levels and the duration of the first stage. In the presence of fetal distress, umbilical cord serum copeptin levels were significantly higher than other groups.

Conclusion

Vaginal delivery can be very painful and stressful, and is accompanied by a marked increase of maternal serum copeptin. Increased maternal levels of serum copeptin were found in cases with pre-eclampsia as compared with the normotensive cases, and it may be helpful in assessing the disease. Intrauterine fetal distress is a strong stimulus to the release of copeptin into the fetal circulation.     

Variation in vaginal breech delivery rates by hospital type

OBJECTIVE: To relate vaginal breech delivery rates to the following hospital types: public, health maintenance organization, private teaching, or private nonteaching. METHODS: In a retrospective study using administrative discharge data from Los Angeles County, California, we calculated the vaginal breech delivery rates of singleton breech deliveries during calendar years 1988 and 1991. RESULTS: Ten thousand four hundred breech deliveries were identified, 8988 (86.4%) term and 1412 (13.6%) preterm. Twelve percent (1252 of 10,400) were vaginal deliveries (10.1% term and 24.5% preterm). Term vaginal breech deliveries varied by hospital type and were more frequent in public hospitals (28.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 26.1%, 30.7%) and less frequent in private nonteaching hospitals (5.4%, 95% CI 4.8%, 5.9%). Term vaginal deliveries were 2.4 to 11.3 times more likely among black women and 1.3 to 6.3 times more likely for Hispanic women across all hospital types, compared with white women in private nonteaching hospitals. There was no difference in the proportion of preterm vaginal breech deliveries by hospital type (mean 24.5%). However, with the exception of public hospitals, the proportion of vaginal breech deliveries for both term and preterm deliveries varied significantly by ethnicity. CONCLUSION: The use of vaginal breech delivery varied by hospital type and patient ethnicity. Within private teaching and nonteaching hospitals, vaginal breech delivery was more likely for black women than for women of other ethnic groups. Further study is needed to understand the hospital policies or organizational factors, as well as the patient-related sociocultural and clinical factors, that contribute to those differences.