Spatial Patterns of Breast Cancer Incidence and Uninsured Women of Mammography Screening Age

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer mortality in women in the United States. Women who lack insurance have mammography screening rates that are suboptimal. Our objective was to spatially correlate incidence rates of breast cancer and uninsured women aged 40–64 years and identify outliers—areas where women may be underscreened due to poor access. The eight‐county consolidated metropolitan statistical area centered on Harris County, Texas was selected as the study region. Breast cancer incidence data from 1995 to 2004 were acquired from the State of Texas Cancer Registry as individual case data geocoded at the census tract level. A bivariate local indicator of spatial autocorrelation was used to evaluate the spatial pattern of breast cancer incidence and uninsured. Statistically significant negative spatial autocorrelation was observed between breast cancer incidence and uninsured status in women aged 40–64 (Moran's I ?0.2065, p < 0.001), indicating that as breast cancer incidence increased, uninsured rates decreased globally. Statistically significant local clusters of low breast cancer incidence and high incidence of uninsured were found. Future research is needed to assess mammography screening behaviors and barriers to screening at the local level.     

Improving access to breast health services with an interdisciplinary model of care

Abstract:  This article reports a hospital's experience confronting a community crisis, stemming from local and national breast health access issues, and evaluates the subsequent effectiveness of the initiative to improve breast care service. An interdisciplinary Breast Care Facility was developed adjacent to a Community Hospital. Patients receiving breast cancer screening during the year prior to the Breast Center opening (2002) were compared with patients in subsequent years (2003–2005). Program effectiveness was evaluated by examining screening mammography volume, wait times and cancer detection rates. Screening volume increased by 29.6%. Wait times declined from 30 weeks to 3.5 weeks. Initially, patients with a suspicious screening mammography had a 2–3 week delay for diagnostic mammography and the subsequent evaluation took another 3–4 weeks. Both times improved to an average of 2–5 days. Screening cancer detection rates increased from 3.2 per 1,000, to 6.3 per 1,000. In addition, the number of cancers identified by screening increased from 40% to 58%, p = 0.002. Patient satisfaction measured by survey was over 95%, in areas of courtesy, counseling, and overall care. Our study demonstrates that a comprehensive breast center model can increase access to breast care services, improve patient satisfaction and address focal areas of shortage. Furthermore, in the years after the opening of the breast center the cancer detection rate during screening increased, an important observation that needs to be investigated with future studies.     

THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF BREAST CANCER SCREENING IN HONG KONG

Background : Breast cancer is the second most common cancer and cause of death in women from Hong Kong. The Well Women Clinic at Kwong Wah Hospital offers breast cancer screening (physical examination and mammography) for women over 40 years of age. Methods : Results of screening over a 2-year period revealed an overall malignancy detection rate of 2.6 per 1000 screens with a strong selection bias for symptomatic women. Results : Screening only slightly increased the proportion of stage I cancers detected; of the malignancies detected, a significant percentage were in situ cancers with doubtful effects on breast cancer mortality. Teamwork and communication were useful in keeping a low referral rate to the surgical clinic of 6.1%, as well as a low biopsy rate for mammographic abnormalities. Conclusions : A re-evaluation of the real risk of breast cancer in young women together with the lack of proven value from screening has suggested a need for reconsideration of offering screening to women 40 years and over in Hong Kong.     

Is surgical management compromised in elderly patients with breast cancer?

OBJECTIVE: The suggestion that breast cancer management is compromised in elderly patients had prompted our review of the results of policies regarding screening and early detection of breast cancer and the adequacy of primary treatment in older women (> or = 65 years of age) compared to younger women (40 to 64 years of age). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although breast cancer in elderly patients is considered biologically less aggressive than similar staged cancer in younger counterparts, outcome still is a matter of stage and adequate treatment of primary cancer. For many reasons, physicians appear reluctant to treat elderly patients according to the same standards used for younger patients. There is even government-mandated alterations in early detection programs. Thus, since 1993, Medicare has mandated screening mammography on a biennial basis for women older than 65 year of age compared to the current accepted standard of yearly mammograms for women older than 50 years of age. Using State Health Department and tumor registry data, the authors reviewed screening practice and management of elderly patients with primary breast cancer to determine the effects of age on screening, detection policies (as reflected in stage at diagnosis), treatment strategies, and outcome. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 5962 patients with breast cancer recorded in the state-wide Tumor Registry of the Hospital Association of Rhoda Island between 1987 and 1995. The focus of the data collection was nine institutions with established tumor registries using AJCC classified tumor data. Additional data were provided by the State Health Department on screening mammography practice in 2536 women during the years 1987, 1989, and 1995. RESULTS: The frequency of mammographic screening for all averaged 40% in 1987, 52% in 1987, and 63% in 1995. In the 65-year-old and older patients, the frequency of screening was 34% in 1987, 45% in 1989, and 48% in 1995, whereas in the 40- to 49-year-old age group, the frequency of mammography was 47% in 1987, 61% in 1989, and 74% in 1995 (p < 0.001). There was a lower detection rate of preinvasive cancer in the 65-year-old and older patients, 8.8% versus 13.7% in patients within the 40- to 64-year-old age group (p < 0.001). There was a higher percentage of treatment by limited surgery among elderly patients with highly curable Stage IA and IB cancer with 26.6% having lumpectomy alone versus 9.4% in the younger patients. Five-year survival in that group was significantly worse (63%) than in patients treated by mastectomy (80%) or lumpectomy with axillary dissection and radiation (95%, < 0.001). A similar effect was seen in patients with Stage II cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer management appears compromised in elderly patients (older than 65 years of age). Frequency of mammography screening is significantly less in elderly women older than 65 years of age. Early detection of preinvasive (curative cancers) is significantly less than in younger patients. The recent requirement by Medicare of mammography every other year may further reduce the opportunity to detect potentially curable cancers. Approximately 20% of patients had inferior treatment of favorable stage early primary cancer with worsened survival. Detection and treatment strategy changes are needed to remedy these deficiencies.     

Survival from primary breast cancer after routine clinical use of mammography

Clinical trials indicate that mammography provides a substantial breast cancer survival benefit; however, there is a need to demonstrate that this benefit extends to clinical practice and to determine the extent that current reductions in mortality are attributable to regular screening or adjuvant systemic therapy. Mammography was used routinely at our institution across a broad age range, in an era when most patients received no adjuvant systemic therapy. We examined breast cancer survival for a cohort of 678 stage I-III primary invasive breast cancer patients accrued from 1971 to 1990, and followed to 1996; 18% received adjuvant hormonal therapy and 15% received adjuvant chemotherapy. There were 61 women less than 40 years old; 136, 40-49 years; 341, 50-69 years; 140, > or =70 years. Factors available for multivariate investigations were age (years), tumor size (cm), nodal status (N-, Nx, N+), ER (fmol/mg protein), PgR (fmol/mg protein), adjuvant radiotherapy (no, yes), adjuvant hormonal therapy (no, yes), and adjuvant chemotherapy (no, yes). Forward stepwise multivariate regression with log-normal survival analysis was used to examine the effects of these factors on disease-specific survival. Ten-year survival by tumor size was adjusted for the effects of other significant factors. For women less than 40 years of age, 10-year survival at the T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2 cut-points for tumor size is, respectively, 0.77, 0.74, 0.67, 0.44; for 40-49 years it is 0.92, 0.90, 0.85, 0.62; for 50-69 years it is 0.81, 0.79, 0.75, 0.62; for > or =70 years it is 0.84, 0.81, 0.73, 0.44. With routine use of clinical mammography and up to 26 years of follow-up, we found breast cancer survival to be significantly better (p< or = 0.05) for all women with smaller tumors and that survival indicated a change in natural disease history with early detection. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) controls had significantly smaller tumors (p < 0.001) than our patients, which may indicate access to mammography outside of the NBSS that reduced the apparent survival benefit for clinical trial mammography.     

Commentary on the Canadian National Breast Screening Study

In the setting of the 25-year follow-up of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study, the Society of Surgical Oncology continues to endorse mammographic screening for women beginning at 40 years of age, while acknowledging that mammography has both risks and benefits. Further investigation is warranted to develop better screening methods and to determine optimal screening schedules for women based on their risk of future breast cancer and their imaging characteristics.     

The Effect of the 2009 USPSTF breast cancer screening recommendations on breast cancer in Michigan: A longitudinal study

In 2009, the revised United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines recommended against routine screening mammography for women age 40‐49 years and against teaching self‐breast examinations (SBE). The aim of this study was to analyze whether breast cancer method of presentation changed following the 2009 USPSTF screening recommendations in a large Michigan cohort. Data were collected on women with newly diagnosed stage 0‐III breast cancer participating in the Michigan Breast Oncology Quality Initiative (MiBOQI) registry at 25 statewide institutions from 2006 to 2015. Data included method of detection, cancer stage, treatment type, and patient demographics. In all, 30 008 women with breast cancer detected via mammogram or palpation with an average age of 60.1 years were included. 38% of invasive cancers were identified by palpation. Presentation with palpable findings decreased slightly over time, from 34.6% in 2006 to 28.9% in 2015 (P < .001). Over the 9‐year period, there was no statistically significant change in rate of palpation‐detected tumors for women age <50 years or ≥50 years (P = .27, .30, respectively). Younger women were more likely to present with palpable tumors compared to older women in a statewide registry. This rate did not increase following publication of the 2009 USPSTF breast cancer screening recommendations.     

Trends in breast cancer at a county hospital

Breast cancer mortality has changed dramatically with improvements in screening techniques. Mammography is essential for early detection; however, its contribution to the survival benefit in young women is questionable. We report our experience in breast biopsies at a county teaching hospital with a traditionally younger patient population. Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to data collection. A total of 550 breast biopsies were conducted between 1995 and 2000. Data regarding age, method of breast biopsy, and pathology was reviewed. One hundred twenty of 550 patients (21.8%) had breast carcinoma detected on breast biopsies with the predominant histologic subtype being invasive ductal carcinoma. The mean age of patients with carcinoma was 52.8 years, whereas that of patients with benign breast disease was 43.6 years (P < 0.05). Forty-three per cent of all breast cancers occurred in women under the age of 50 years. During the study period, there was neither an increase in the number of breast biopsies performed per year nor a decrease in the average age of women with breast cancer. However, observing a significant percentage of breast cancer patients under 50 years old, our data suggest the importance of strict adherence to current screening recommendations including self-breast examination and yearly mammography.     

Breast cancer screening in surgical patients]

Between January and August 1996, 304 patients of the Department of General and Abdominal Surgery of the University of Mainz who were at least 40 year old, were interviewed about their breast cancer screening behavior. The aim of our investigation was to evaluate the attitude of the target population to breast screening and the value of breast palpation, completed with mammography, during the women's treatment in hospital. 168 (55%) of the interviewed women reported that they had a yearly clinical breast examination in the past. All patients underwent a clinical breast examination. 185 (60%) did not have a mammography in the past or within the past 2 years. These women were offered a mammographic examination during their treatment in the hospital. The investigation revealed one invasive breast cancer. 13 patients had abnormal mammographic or sonographic findings. Our investigation shows, that the compliance of the target population for breast cancer screening is low. Therefore it is necessary to point out the value of breast cancer prevention with clinical examination and mammography also for patients treated in the hospital for an other disease. Every female patient should undergo breast examination. But early detection of breast cancer before micrometastases have occurred is only possible by mammography.     

Relationship between method of detection of breast cancer and stage of disease, method of treatment, and survival in women aged 40 to 49 years.

The optimal breast cancer screening program for women 40 to 49 years of age remains controversial. To help assess the value of screening mammography for this age group, we studied the relationship between the method of breast cancer detection and stage, therapy, and survival. Cases of breast cancer diagnosed at Sinai Hospital (Detroit, MI) between January 1985 and December 1994 were reviewed. A total of 181 cases involving 40- to 49-year-old women were available for analysis. The distribution of stage of disease significantly differed among the three methods of detection (P<0.0001). Breast-conserving surgery was more commonly performed in cases detected by screening mammography and clinical breast examination than in cases detected by breast self-examination (P = 0.001). Variation in the stage of disease resulted in improved survival for cases detected by screening mammography and clinical breast examination when compared with those detected by breast self-examination (P = 0.019). Women diagnosed with breast cancer between the ages of 40 and 49 years had earlier stage disease, were more likely to be treated with breast-conserving therapy, and had better survival if their disease was first recognized by screening mammography. Screening mammography has an important role for women of this age.     

Mammographisches Screening ab 5. oder 6. Lebensjahrzehnt?

Mammography is an established diagnostic procedure for breast cancer. Data concerning screening mammography are available from nine prospectively controlled trials, the largest series being presented from Sweden. Mammographic screening leads to a significant reduction of breast cancer of 30% in women ages 50-59 years. In younger women (40-49 years) the benefit accounts to only 20% and has not proven to be statistically significant. Nevertheless, the major advantage of mammographic screening is detection of the non-palpable tumor < or = 10 mm in size. The treatment of these small breast carcinomas leads to long-term survival rates of > or = 90%. Mammographic screening programs have been introduced in the USA, Canada, Iceland and Sweden for women in their 5th decade of life. Starting yearly lifelong mammography-screening at the age of 40, the theoretical cancer induction by radiation exposure does not exceed 0.1%. Under highly qualified conditions, it should be possible to minimize false-positive and false-negative screening results. In Germany, screening-mammography is only introduced in patients at high risk for breast cancer. Based on medical data, mammography must be a part of screening for women with an average risk--starting at the age of 40, although there are still open questions needing further clinical research.     

1989 Basel Mammography Action]

To evaluate the compliance for a breast cancer screening program in the region of Basel, a mammography and a clinical examination has been offered free of charge to women between 40 and 60 years of age, especially to women with familial breast cancer. From September to November 1989, 602 women participated. Results were obtained from an epidemiologic questionnaire and a two-view mammography. The median age was 55.1 years. 70.2% of the women never had a mammography before. 28.8% indicated a history of familial breast cancer. So far 444 women have been evaluated. No pathological results were obtained in 84.8% In 10.7% a second examination has been recommended in the near future. In 4.5% the mammography led to an aspiration biopsy or surgical lumpectomy where 5 (1.2%) neoplasms have been detected. Due to the limited duration of the campaign and the invitation especially addressed to women at risk, our results are not comparable with large-scale screening campaigns known from the literature. Nevertheless, we succeeded to sensitize the female population for this kind of breast care. The overwhelming success shows that the basis for a large-scale screening program may exist.     

Effects of screening mammography on the comparative survival rates of African American,white, and Hispanic beneficiaries of a comprehensive health care system

This study reviewed mammographic screening related to breast carcinoma diagnosis and treatment between 1987 and 1997 at Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX. Epidemiologic data from the Department of Defense Automated Central Tumor Registry were merged with data from patients' medical records and responses of the patients or their families to a mailed survey. The cases of 907 women grouped by race-white, African American, and Hispanic-were analyzed. Breast carcinoma diagnosed by mammographic screening showed a reversed ratio of early to late stage of cancer occurring for all three groups. That ratio was 1.45 for African Americans, 2.67 for Hispanics, and 3.08 for whites. For those women diagnosed with screening mammography, no statistically significant difference in 5-year survival was found between the races: 86% for whites, 83% for Hispanics, and 80% for African Americans. Mammographic screening as a diagnostic tool appears to equalize survival among whites, Hispanics, and African Americans, in spite of differences in age, stage of diagnosis, and military rank used as a proxy for socioeconomic status. When not controlling for mammographic diagnosis, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in survival patterns between whites, Hispanics, and African Americans. Five-year survival rates were 71% for whites, 74% for Hispanics, and 53% for African Americans. Screening mammography reduced 5-year mortality by almost 59% in African Americans, 52% in whites, and 36% in Hispanics. Whites were diagnosed with breast carcinoma, on average, at 57 years of age-11 years later than African Americans (average age 46 years) and 7 years later than Hispanic women (average age 50 years). As a diagnostic tool, screening mammography was used to discover breast cancer in 36% of white women, 33% of Hispanics, and 22% of African Americans. Further research is recommended to examine the use of mammography among various racial/ethnic groups.     

Trends in mammography and clinical breast examination: a population-based study

BACKGROUND: There are well-accepted clinical guidelines for early detection of breast cancer through mammography and clinical breast examination. The purpose of this study was to determine trends in the utilization of these techniques over the past 5 years. METHODS: The National Health Interview Survey is a population-based computer survey of noninstitutionalized civilian Americans conducted annually by the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We evaluated the reported use of mammography and clinical breast examination in women 40 years of age and older between 2000 and 2005. Data were evaluated using SAS and SAS-callable SUDAAN software. RESULTS: Surveyed were 10,994 and 11,128 women over age 40 in 2000 and 2005, respectively. Between these years, there was a decline in women >or=40 years old who reported ever having a mammogram (80.79% versus 79.52%, P<0.0001) and in those who had a mammogram within the preceding 2 years (87.98% versus 86.30%, P=0.0040). In addition, there was a drop in women reporting ever having a clinical breast exam (82.12% versus 75.91%, P<0.0001) and in those reporting having had a clinical breast exam in the 2 years prior to the survey (89.24% versus 87.63%, P=0.0012). Similar results were found in the population aged 50-69. CONCLUSIONS: Despite well-established clinical guidelines for early detection of breast cancer, there has been a decline in the rates of annual mammography and clinical breast exam in women over the age of 40 over the past 5 years.     

Mammographic screening of the high-risk woman

Annual screening mammography beginning at age 40 is recommended for the general population. For some women at high risk for developing breast cancer at a younger age, annual screening may be appropriate starting at an earlier age. These women include those with a personal history of breast cancer, nontherapeutic radiation to the breasts especially for Hodgkin's disease, BRCA positive women, women with a family history of a first-degree relative with breast cancer at a young age, and women with a biopsy diagnosis of lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical ductal hyperplasia. Women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical lobular hyperplasia develop breast cancer after age 40 and do not need earlier screening, unless they have a family history of breast cancer. Although increasing a woman's risk for breast cancer, radial scar does not increase risk for women younger than 40 years old and therefore does not require screening at a young age.     

Screening of cancer of the breast]

Breast cancer is the commonest cancer in women. Screening for a severe and frequent disease with a long doubling time can be applied to breast cancer. Mammography is accepted by the population as a screening test, as it is simple, painless and safe. Many foreign studies combining either clinical examination and mammography or using mammography alone have confirmed the following elements: cancers are detected at an earlier stage than in the control population, screening of women under the age of 50 years does not provide convincing results, as a decreased mortality is only observed for women over the age of 50 years. Screening was introduced in France in 1989 by law and is now performed in 8 departments. The number of deaths prevented as a result of this action is estimated to be a minimum of 1,000 per year. Screening has positive effects on the quality of radiological equipment, improvement of preoperative detection techniques and on the accuracy of the pathology report. Inversely, its disadvantages include false-negative and false-positive results, leading to a certain number of negative operations. Screening will decrease the incidence of invasive cancers and mastectomies and the role of reconstructive surgery after mastectomy for breast cancer. However, the indications for plastic surgery in clinically detectable breast cancer will increase based on collaboration between breast cancer specialists and plastic surgeons.     

Breast cancer burden in Maiduguri, North eastern Nigeria

Abstract:  Breast cancer is a global disease and incidence continues to rise especially in the sub-Saharan Africa. In Nigeria, breast cancer is currently the most common malignancy. This study aimed at describing the pattern of breast cancers in Maiduguri and to determine if there is any significant changing trend of frequency. This is a retrospective review data of breast cancers between 2001 and 2005 in the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital Cancer Registry. A total of 1,216 cases of cancers were registered within the study period and breast cancer accounted for 13.9%. There were 490 breast biopsy specimens and breast cancer accounted for 34.5%. There were 161 females and 8 males breast cancer within the study period giving a F:M ratio 20:1. There were four cases of bilateral breast cancers. The age ranges between 17 and 85 years and the peak age group was 40–49 years which accounted for 61 cases (36.1%). The commonest histologic type of breast cancer was invasive ductal carcinoma which accounted for 82.6%; invasive lobular (6.6%); medullary (4.3%); colloid (1.7%); papillary (1.1%); and others (5.1%). In conclusion, breast cancer is on the increase in our environment and therefore there is need for public enlightenment, screening all women at risk, early detection of the lesion, and proper management in our health institution.     

Stratification of palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer by method of detection and age

Background: Methods used to diagnose breast cancer in women under the age of 50 years are somewhat controversial. To determine the relationship between type and stage of breast cancer, clinical presentation, and age, we reviewed breast cancer diagnosed at our institution during a recent 3-year period. Methods: Records from 589 consecutive excisional biopsies and 372 needle placement biopsies performed over a 3-year period were reviewed. Carcinomas were staged according to the TNM system and results compared usingx ². Results: Breast carcinoma was diagnosed in 118 women during the study period, 33% in patients under 50 years of age. Breast cancer diagnosed by mammography in all age groups was more likely to be noninvasive than that diagnosed by physical examination (p<0.05). The few invasive cancers diagnosed by mammography in women under age 50 were lower in stage than those diagnosed by physical examination, although not by a statistically significant amount (p=0.125). Breast cancer diagnosed by mammography in women 50 years and older was significantly lower in stage than that diagnosed by physical examination (p<0.05). Conclusions: Invasive carcinoma detected as a nonpalpable lesion by mammography was earlier in stage than invasive carcinoma detected by physical examination, including in women under 50 years of age, although the number of invasive cancers detected in younger women was quite small. The role of mammography in this younger age group remains to be defined. Disclaimer: The viewpoints expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Navy or Department of Defense.