Image registration improves human knee cartilage T1 mapping with delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC)

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of automated registration in delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of the knee on the occurrence of movement artefacts on the T1 map and the reproducibility of region-of-interest (ROI)-based measurements.

Methods

Eleven patients with early-stage knee osteoarthritis and ten healthy controls underwent dGEMRIC twice at 3?T. Controls underwent unenhanced imaging. ROIs were manually drawn on the femoral and tibial cartilage. T1 calculation was performed with and without registration of the T1-weighted images. Automated three-dimensional rigid registration was performed on the femur and tibia cartilage separately. Registration quality was evaluated using the square root Cramér–Rao lower bound (CRLB_σ). Additionally, the reproducibility of dGEMRIC was assessed by comparing automated registration with manual slice-matching.

Results

Automated registration of the T1-weighted images improved the T1 maps as the 90% percentile of the CRLB_σ was significantly (P?<?0.05) reduced with a median reduction of 55.8 ms (patients) and 112.9 ms (controls). Manual matching and automated registration of the re-imaged T1 map gave comparable intraclass correlation coefficients of respectively 0.89/0.90 (patients) and 0.85/0.85 (controls).

Conclusions

Registration in dGEMRIC reduces movement artefacts on T1 maps and provides a good alternative to manual slice-matching in longitudinal studies.

Key Points

? Quantitative MRI is increasingly used for biomedical assessment of knee articular cartilage ? Image registration leads to more accurate quantification of cartilage quality and damage ? Movement artefacts in delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) are reduced ? Automated image registration successfully aligns baseline and follow-up dGEMRIC examinations ? Reproducibility of dGEMRIC with registration is similar to that using manual slice-matching     

7 Tesla quantitative hip MRI: T1, T2 and T2* mapping of hip cartilage in healthy volunteers

Objectives

To evaluate the technical feasibility and applicability of quantitative MR techniques (delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC), T2 mapping, T2* mapping) at 7 T MRI for assessing hip cartilage.

Methods

Hips of 11 healthy volunteers were examined at 7 T MRI with an 8-channel radiofrequency transmit/receive body coil using multi-echo sequences for T2 and T2* mapping and a dual flip angle gradient-echo sequence before (T1₀) and after intravenous contrast agent administration (T1_Gd; 0.2 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA^2? followed by 0.5 h of walking and 0.5 h of rest) for dGEMRIC. Relaxation times of cartilage were measured manually in 10 regions of interest. Pearson’s correlations between R1_delta?=?1/T1_Gd???1/T1₀ and T1_Gd and between T2 and T2* were calculated. Image quality and the delineation of acetabular and femoral cartilage in the relaxation time maps were evaluated using discrete rating scales.

Results

High correlations were found between R1_delta and T1_Gd and between T2 and T2* relaxation times (all p?<?0.01). All techniques delivered diagnostic image quality, with best delineation of femoral and acetabular cartilage in the T2* maps (mean 3.2 out of a maximum of 4 points).

Conclusions

T1, T2 and T2* mapping of hip cartilage with diagnostic image quality is feasible at 7 T. To perform dGEMRIC at 7 T, pre-contrast T1 mapping can be omitted.

Key Points

? dGEMRIC of hip cartilage with diagnostic image quality is feasible at 7 T. ? To perform dGEMRIC at 7 T, pre-contrast T1 mapping can be omitted. ? T2(*) mapping of hip cartilage with diagnostic image quality is feasible at 7 T. ? T2 and T2* relaxation times of cartilage were highly correlated at 7 T. ? Best delineation of femoral and acetabular cartilage was found in T2* maps.

     

Reproducibility of dGEMRIC in assessment of hip joint cartilage: A prospective study

Purpose

To investigate the reproducibility of dGEMRIC in the assessment of cartilage health of the adult asymptomatic hip joint.

Materials and Methods

Fifteen asymptomatic volunteers (mean age, 26.3 years ± 3.0) were preliminarily studied. Any volunteer that was incidentally diagnosed with damaged cartilage on MRI (n = 5) was excluded. Ten patients that had no evidence of prior cartilage damage (mean age, 26.2 years ± 3.4) were evaluated further in this study. The reproducibility of dGEMRIC was assessed with two T1_Gd exams performed 4 weeks apart in these volunteers. The protocol involved an initial standard MRI to confirm healthy cartilage, which was then followed by dGEMRIC. The second scan included only the repeat dGEMRIC. Region of interest (ROI) analyses for T1_Gd‐measurement was performed in seven radial reformats. Statistical analysis included the student's t‐test and intra‐class correlation (ICC) measurement to assess reproducibility.

Results

Overall 70 ROIs were studied. Mean cartilage T1_Gd values at various loci ranged from 560.9 ms to 684.4 ms at the first set of readings and 551.5 ms to 662.2 ms in the second one. The mean difference per region of interest between the two T1_Gd‐measurements ranged from 21.4 ms (3.7%) to 45.0 ms (6.8%), which was not found to be statistically significant (P = 0.153). There was a high reproducibility detected (ICC range, 0.667–0.915). Intra‐ and Inter‐observer analyses proved a high agreement for T1_Gd assessment (0.973 and 0.932).

Conclusion

We found dGEMRIC to be a reliable tool in the assessment of cartilage health status in adult hip joints. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;30:224–228. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Cartilage quality in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of T2* mapping, native T1 mapping, dGEMRIC, ΔR1 and value of pre-contrast imaging

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate four non-invasive markers of cartilage quality—T2* mapping, native T1 mapping, dGEMRIC and ΔR1—in healthy volunteers and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

Materials and methods

Cartilage of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints II were imaged in 28 consecutive subjects: 12 healthy volunteers [9 women, mean (SD) age 52.67 (9.75) years, range 30–66] and 16 RA patients with MCP II involvement [12 women, mean (SD) age 58.06 (12.88) years, range 35–76]. Sagittal T2* mapping was performed with a multi-echo gradient-echo on a 3?T MRI scanner. For T1 mapping the dual flip angle method was applied prior to native T1 mapping and 40?min after gadolinium application (delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage, dGEMRIC, T1_Gd). The difference in the longitudinal relaxation rate induced by gadolinium (ΔR1) was calculated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC) was used to test for differentiation of RA patients from healthy volunteers.

Results

dGEMRIC (AUC 0.81) and ΔR1 (AUC 0.75) significantly differentiated RA patients from controls. T2* mapping (AUC 0.66) and native T1 mapping (AUC 0.66) were not significantly different in RA patients compared to controls.

Conclusions

The data support the use of dGEMRIC for the assessment of MCP joint cartilage quality in RA. T2* and native T1 mapping are of low diagnostic value. Pre-contrast T1 mapping for the calculation of ΔR1 does not increase the diagnostic value of dGEMRIC.     

Three-dimensional delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of hip joint cartilage at 3T: A prospective controlled study

Purpose

To assess acetabular and femoral hip joint cartilage with three-dimensional (3D) delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (dGEMRIC) in patients with degeneration of hip joint cartilage and asymptomatic controls with morphologically normal appearing cartilage.

Methods and materials

A total of 40 symptomatic patients (18 males, 22 females; mean age: 32.8 ± 10.2 years, range: 18–57 years) with different hip joint deformities including femoroacetabular impingement (n = 35), residual hip dysplasia (n = 3) and coxa magna due to Legg–Calve–Perthes disease in childhood (n = 2) underwent high-resolution 3D dGEMRIC for the evaluation of acetabular and femoral hip joint cartilage. Thirty-one asymptomatic healthy volunteers (12 males, 19 females; mean age: 24.5 ± 1.8 years, range: 21–29 years) without underlying hip deformities were included as control. MRI was performed at 3 T using a body matrix phased array coil. Region of interest (ROI) analyses for T1_Gd assessment was performed in seven regions in the hip joint, including anterior to superior and posterior regions.

Results

T1_Gd mapping demonstrated the typical pattern of acetabular cartilage consistent with a higher glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content in the main weight-bearing area. T1_Gd values were significantly higher in the control group than in the patient group whereas significant differences in T1_Gd values corresponding to the amount of cartilage damage were noted both in the patient group and in the control group.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates the potential of high-resolution 3D dGEMRIC at 3 T for separate acetabular and femoral hip joint cartilage assessment in various forms of hip joint deformities.     

T2* mapping and delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in cartilage (dGEMRIC) of glenohumeral cartilage in asymptomatic volunteers at 3 T

Objectives

To establish baseline T2* and T1_Gd values of glenohumeral cartilage at 3 T.

Methods

Forty asymptomatic volunteers (mean age: 24.8?±?2.2 years) without shoulder abnormalities were included. The MRI protocol comprised a double-echo steady-state (DESS) sequence for morphological cartilage evaluation, a gradient-echo multiecho sequence for T2* assessment, and a gradient-echo dual-flip-angle sequence for T1_Gd mapping. Statistical assessment involved a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to identify the differences between various regions of the glenohumeral joint and intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis comparing repetitive T2* and T1_Gd measures to assess intra- and interobserver reliability.

Results

Both techniques revealed significant differences between superior and inferior glenohumeral cartilage demonstrating higher T2* (26.2 ms vs. 23.2 ms, P value?<?0.001) and T1_Gd (750.1 ms vs. 720.2 ms, P value?=?0.014) values in the superior regions. No trend was observed in the anterior-posterior measurement (P value range: 0.279–1.000). High intra- and interobserver agreement (ICC value range: 0.895–0.983) was noted for both T2* and T1_Gd mapping.

Conclusions

T2* and T1_Gd mapping are reliable in the assessment of glenohumeral cartilage. The values from this study can be used for comparison to identify cartilage degeneration in patients suffering from shoulder joint abnormalities.

Key Points

? T2* mapping and dGEMRIC are sensitive to collagen degeneration and proteoglycan depletion. ? This study aimed to establish baseline T2*/dGEMRIC values of glenohumeral cartilage. ? Both techniques revealed significant differences between superior and inferior glenohumeral cartilage. ? High intra-/interreader agreement was noted for both T2* mapping and dGEMRIC. ? These baseline normal values should be useful when identifying potential degeneration.     

Validity of gradient-echo three-dimensional delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of hip joint cartilage: A histologically controlled study

Objective

To validate gradient-echo three-dimensional (3D) delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) by means of histological analyses in the assessment of hip joint cartilage.

Materials and methods

Twenty-one femoral head specimens collected from 21 patients (7 males, 14 females, mean age: 60.9 ± 9.6 years; range: 37.6–77.3 years), who underwent total hip replacement for symptomatic hip joint osteoarthritis, underwent MRI and histological assessment. A region of 2 cm² at the weight-bearing area was marked with four pins to enable multi-planar MRI reformatting to be matched with histological sections. MRI was performed at 3 T with a 3D double-echo steady-state (DESS) sequence for morphological cartilage assessment and 3D Volumetric Interpolated Breathhold Examination (VIBE) for T1_Gd mapping. Histological sections were evaluated according to the Mankin score system. Total Mankin score, grade of toluidine staining (sensitive for glycosaminoglycan content) and a modified Mankin score classification system with four sub-groups of cartilage damage were correlated with MRI data.

Results

Spearman's rho correlation analyses revealed a statistically significant correlation between T1_Gd mapping and histological analyses in all categories including total Mankin score (r = −0.658, p-value ≤ 0.001), toluidine staining (r = −0.802, p-value < 0.001) and modified Mankin score (r = −0.716, p-value < 0.001). The correlation between morphological MRI and histological cartilage assessment was statistically significant but inferior to the biochemical cartilage MRI (r-values ranging from −0.411 to 0.525, p-values < 0.001).

Conclusions

Gradient-echo dGEMRIC is reliable while offering the unique features of high image resolution and 3D biochemically sensitive MRI for the assessment of early cartilage degeneration.     

Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC), after slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content in hip joint cartilage in mature hips with a history of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) using delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC).

Methods

28 young-adult subjects (32 hips) with a mean age of 23.8 ± 4.0 years (range: 18.1-30.5 years) who were treated for mild or moderate SCFE in adolescence were included into the study. Hip function and clinical symptoms were evaluated with the Harris hip score (HHS) system at the time of MRI. Plain radiographic evaluation included Tonnis grading, measurement of the minimal joint space width (JSW) and alpha-angle measurement. The alpha-angle values were used to classify three sub-groups: group 1 = subjects with normal femoral head-neck offset (alpha-angle <50°), group 2 = subjects with mild offset decrease (alpha-angle 50°-60°), and group 3 = subjects with severe offset decrease (alpha-angle >60°).

Results

There was statistically significant difference noted for the T1_Gd values, lateral and central, between group 1 and group 3 (p-values = 0.038 and 0.041). The T1_Gd values measured within the lateral portion were slightly lower compared with the T1_Gd values measured within the central portion that was at a statistically significance level (p-value <0.001). HHS, Tonnis grades and JSW revealed no statistically significant difference.

Conclusion

By using dGEMRIC in the mid-term follow-up of SCFE we were able to reveal degenerative changes even in the absence of joint space narrowing that seem to be related to the degree of offset pathology. The dGEMRIC technique may be a potential diagnostic modality in the follow-up evaluation of SCFE.     

Using the dGEMRIC technique to evaluate cartilage health in the presence of surgical hardware at 3T: comparison of inversion recovery and saturation recovery approaches

Objective

To evaluate the effect of metal artifact reduction techniques on dGEMRIC T₁ calculation with surgical hardware present.

Materials and methods

We examined the effect of stainless-steel and titanium hardware on dGEMRIC T₁ maps. We tested two strategies to reduce metal artifact in dGEMRIC: (1) saturation recovery (SR) instead of inversion recovery (IR) and (2) applying the metal artifact reduction sequence (MARS), in a gadolinium-doped agarose gel phantom and in vivo with titanium hardware. T₁ maps were obtained using custom curve-fitting software and phantom ROIs were defined to compare conditions (metal, MARS, IR, SR).

Results

A large area of artifact appeared in phantom IR images with metal when TI?≤?700 ms. IR maps with metal had additional artifact both in vivo and in the phantom (shifted null points, increased mean T₁ (+151 % IR ROI_artifact) and decreased mean inversion efficiency (f; 0.45 ROI_artifact, versus 2 for perfect inversion)) compared to the SR maps (ROI_artifact: +13 % T₁ SR, 0.95 versus 1 for perfect excitation), however, SR produced noisier T₁ maps than IR (phantom SNR: 118 SR, 212 IR). MARS subtly reduced the extent of artifact in the phantom (IR and SR).

Conclusions

dGEMRIC measurement in the presence of surgical hardware at 3T is possible with appropriately applied strategies. Measurements may work best in the presence of titanium and are severely limited with stainless steel. For regions near hardware where IR produces large artifacts making dGEMRIC analysis impossible, SR-MARS may allow dGEMRIC measurements. The position and size of the IR artifact is variable, and must be assessed for each implant/imaging set-up.     

Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the meniscus (dGEMRIM) in patients with knee osteoarthritis: relation with meniscal degeneration on conventional MRI,reproducibility, and correlation with dGEMRIC

Objectives

To assess (1) whether normal and degenerated menisci exhibit different T1_GD on delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the meniscus (dGEMRIM), (2) the reproducibility of dGEMRIM and (3) the correlation between meniscus and cartilage T1_GD in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients.

Methods

In 17 OA patients who underwent dGEMRIM twice within 7 days, meniscus and cartilage T1_GD was calculated. Meniscus pathology was evaluated on conventional MRI. T1_GD in normal and degenerated menisci were compared using a Student’s t-test. Reproducibility was assessed using ICCs. Pearson’s correlation was calculated between meniscus and cartilage T1_GD.

Results

A trend towards lower T1_GD in degenerated menisci (mean: 402 ms; 95 % CI: 359–444 ms) compared to normal menisci (mean: 448 ms; 95 % CI: 423–473 ms) was observed (p?=?0.05). Meniscus T1_GD ICCs were 0.85–0.90. The correlation between meniscus and cartilage T1_GD was moderate in the lateral (r?=?0.52–0.75) and strong in the medial compartment (r?=?0.78–0.94).

Conclusions

Our results show that degenerated menisci have a clear trend towards lower T1_GD compared to normal menisci. Since these results are highly reproducible, meniscus degeneration may be assessed within one delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI simultaneously with cartilage. The strong correlation between meniscus and cartilage T1_GD suggests concomitant degeneration in both tissues in OA, but also suggests that dGEMRIC may not be regarded entirely as sulphated glycosaminoglycan specific.

Key Points

? dGEMRIM T1 _GD can possibly be used to assess meniscal degeneration; ? dGEMRIM yields highly reproducible meniscal T1 _GD in early stage osteoarthritic patients; ? Concomitant degeneration of cartilage and meniscus tissue occurs in early stage osteoarthritis; ? dGEMRIC cannot be regarded as entirely sulphated glycosaminoglycan specific.     

An in vitro comparative study of T2 and T2* mappings of human articular cartilage at 3-Tesla MRI using histology as the standard of reference

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlations between T2 value, T2* value, and histological grades of degenerated human articular cartilage.

Materials and methods

T2 mapping and T2* mapping of nine tibial osteochondral specimens were obtained using a 3-T MRI after total knee arthroplasty. A total of 94 ROIs were analyzed. Histological grades were assessed using the David–Vaudey scale. Spearman’s rho correlation analysis and Pearson’s correlation analysis were performed.

Results

The mean relaxation values in T2 map with different histological grades (0, 1, 2) of the cartilage were 51.9?±?9.2 ms, 55.8?±?12.8 ms, and 59.6?±?10.2 ms, respectively. The mean relaxation values in T2* map with different histological grades (0, 1, 2) of the cartilage were 20.3?±?10.3 ms, 21.1?±?12.4 ms, and 15.4?±?8.5 ms, respectively. Spearman’s rho correlation analysis confirmed a positive correlation between T2 value and histological grade (ρ?=?0.313, p?<?0.05). Pearson’s correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between T2 and T2* (r?=??0.322, p?<?0.05). Although T2* values showed a decreasing trend with an increase in cartilage degeneration, this correlation was not statistically significant in this study (ρ?=??0.192, p?=?0.129).

Conclusions

T2 mapping was correlated with histological degeneration, and it may be a good biomarker for osteoarthritis in human articular cartilage. However, the strength of the correlation was weak (ρ?=?0.313). Although T2* values showed a decreasing trend with an increase in cartilage degeneration, the correlation was not statistically significant. Therefore, T2 mapping may be more appropriate for the initial diagnosis of articular cartilage degeneration in the knee joint. Further studies on T2* mapping are needed to confirm its reliability and mechanism in cartilage degeneration.     

Alignment does not influence cartilage T2 in asymptomatic knee joints

Purpose

To investigate whether the static knee alignment affects articular cartilage ultrastructures when measured using T2 relaxation among asymptomatic subjects.

Methods

Both knee joints (n = 96) of 48 asymptomatic volunteers (26 females, 22 males; 25.4 ± 1.7 years; no history of major knee trauma or surgery) were evaluated clinically (Lysholm, Tegner) and by MRI (hip–knee–ankle angle, standard knee protocol, T2 mapping). Group (n = 4) division was as follows: neutral (<1° varus/valgus), mild varus (2°–4° varus), severe varus (>4° varus) and valgus (2°–4° valgus) deformity with n = 12 subjects/group; n = 24 knees/group. Regions of interest (ROI) for T2 assessment were placed within full-thickness cartilage across the whole joint surface and were divided respecting compartmental as well as functional joint anatomy.

Results

Leg alignment was 0.7° ± 0.5° varus among neutral, 3.0° ± 0.6° varus among mild varus, 5.0° ± 1.1° varus among severe varus and 2.5° ± 0.7° valgus among valgus group subjects and thus significantly different. No differences between the groups emerged from clinical measures. No morphological pathology was detected in any knee joint. Global T2 values (42.3 ± 2.3; 37.7–47.9 ms) of ROIs placed within every knee joint per subject were not different between alignment groups or between genders, respectively.

Conclusion

Static frontal plane leg malalignment does not affect cartilage ultrastructure among young, asymptomatic individuals as measured by T2 quantitative imaging.

Level of evidence

Cross-sectional study, Level II-III.     

Quantitative MRI in the evaluation of articular cartilage health: reproducibility and variability with a focus on T2 mapping

Purpose

Early diagnosis of cartilage degeneration and longitudinal tracking of cartilage health including repair following surgical intervention would benefit from the ability to detect and monitor changes of the articular cartilage non-invasively and before gross morphological alterations appear.

Methods

Quantitative MR imaging has shown promising results with various imaging biomarkers such as T2 mapping, T1 rho and dGEMRIC demonstrating sensitivity in the detection of biochemical alterations within tissues of interest. However, acquiring accurate and clinically valuable quantitative data has proven challenging, and the reproducibility of the quantitative mapping technique and its values are essential. Although T2 mapping has been the focus in this discussion, all quantitative mapping techniques are subject to the same issues including variability in the imaging protocol, unloading and exercise, analysis, scanner and coil, calculation methods, and segmentation and registration concerns.

Results

The causes for variability between time points longitudinally in a patient, among patients, and among centres need to be understood further and the issues addressed.

Conclusions

The potential clinical applications of quantitative mapping are vast, but, before the clinical community can take full advantage of this tool, it must be automated, standardized, validated, and have proven reproducibility prior to its implementation into the standard clinical care routine.     

Morphological imaging and T2 and T2* mapping of hip cartilage at 7 Tesla MRI under the influence of intravenous gadolinium

Objectives

To investigate the influence of intravenous gadolinium on cartilage T2 and T2* relaxation times and on morphological image quality at 7-T hip MRI.

Methods

Hips of 11 healthy volunteers were examined at 7 T. Multi-echo sequences for T2 and T2* mapping, 3D T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) and double-echo steady-state (DESS) sequences were acquired before and after intravenous application of gadolinium according to a delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) protocol. Cartilage relaxation times were measured in both scans. Morphological sequences were assessed quantitatively using contrast ratios and qualitatively using a 4-point Likert scale. Student’s t-test, Pearson’s correlation (ρ) and Wilcoxon sign-rank test were used for statistical comparisons.

Results

Pre- and post-contrast T2 and T2* values were highly correlated (T2: acetabular: ρ?=?0.76, femoral: ρ?=?0.77; T2*: acetabular: ρ?=?0.80, femoral: ρ?=?0.72). Gadolinium enhanced contrasts between cartilage and joint fluid in DESS and T1 VIBE according to the qualitative (p?=?0.01) and quantitative (p?<?0.001) analysis. The delineation of acetabular and femoral cartilage and the labrum predominantly improved with gadolinium.

Conclusions

Gadolinium showed no relevant influence on T2 or T2* relaxation times and improved morphological image quality at 7 T. Therefore, morphological and quantitative sequences including dGEMRIC can be conducted in a one-stop-shop examination.

Key Points

? Hip cartilage T2 values correlate highly before and after gadolinium at 7 T ? Hip cartilage T2* values correlate highly before and after enhancement at 7 T ? Morphological hip cartilage imaging benefits from intravenous gadolinium at 7 T ? The delineation of acetabular and femoral cartilage can be improved by gadolinium ? Morphological and quantitative sequences including dGEMRIC can be combined as a one-stop-shop examination

     

Delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage in the ankle at 3 T: Feasibility and preliminary results after matrix‐associated autologous chondrocyte implantation

Purpose:

To demonstrate the feasibility of delayed gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in the ankle at 3 T and to obtain preliminary data on matrix associated autologous chondrocyte (MACI) repair tissue.

Materials and Methods:

A 3D dual flip angle sequence was used with an eight‐channel multipurpose coil at 3 T to obtain T1 maps both pre‐ and postintravenous contrast agent (Magnevist, 0.2 mM/kg). Postcontrast T1 over time was evaluated in three volunteers; a modified dGEMRIC protocol was then used to assess 10 cases after MACI in the ankle.

Results:

Forty‐five minutes were found sufficient for maximum T1 decrease. MACI cases had a precontrast mean T1 of 1050 ± 148.4 msec in reference cartilage (RC) and 1080 ± 165.6 msec in repair tissue (RT). Postcontrast T1 decreased to 590 ± 134.0 msec in RC and 554 ± 133.0 msec in RT. There was no significant difference between the delta relaxation rates in RT (9.44 × 10^?4 s^?1) and RC (8.04 × 10^?4 s^?1, P = 0.487). The mean relative delta relaxation rate was 1.34 ± 0.83.

Conclusion:

It is feasible to assess the thin cartilage layers of the ankle with dGEMRIC at 3 T; MACI can yield RT with properties similar to articular cartilage. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;31:732–739. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

     

Value of precontrast T1 for dGEMRIC of native articular cartilage

Purpose

To evaluate if the difference between pre‐ and post‐Gd‐DTPA^2‐ relaxation rate (ΔR₁) provides better differentiation of osteoarthritic patients (OA) from healthy subjects (HS) with dGEMRIC, as compared to post‐Gd‐DTPA^2‐ spin‐lattice relaxation time (T_1Gd).

Materials and Methods

Seventeen OA and 14 HS underwent pre‐ and 90 minutes postcontrast (Gd‐DTPA^2‐) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee, using inversion recovery fast spin‐echo and/or Lock–Locker sequences for T₁ mapping. Effect sizes for T_1pre, T_1Gd, and ΔR₁ were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and regression analysis were also performed to assess the effectiveness of each parameter in the separation of OA and HS.

Results

T_1Gd and ΔR₁ were almost identical in terms of areas under ROC curves (0.903 and 0.914, respectively), and effect sizes (1.34 and 1.31, respectively). These were significantly higher than T_1pre. In addition, a high inverse correlation was observed between ΔR₁ vs. T_1Gd (R = 0.96).

Conclusion

Either T_1Gd or ΔR₁ could be used as an index in the evaluation of native cartilage. However, considering the practical logistical cost involved in terms of time and effort to acquire precontrast T₁ measurements, our data further support the continued use of T_1Gd as the dGEMRIC index in the evaluation of native cartilage. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;29:494–497. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The application of T1 and T2 relaxation time and magnetization transfer ratios to the early diagnosis of patellar cartilage osteoarthritis

Objectives

We compare the T1 and T2 relaxation times and magnetization transfer ratios (MTRs) of normal subjects and patients with osteoarthritis (OA) to evaluate the ability of these techniques to aid in the early diagnosis and treatment of OA.

Materials and methods

The knee joints in 11 normal volunteers and 40 patients with OA were prospectively evaluated using T1 relaxation times as measured using delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC), T2 relaxation times (multiple spin-echo sequence, T2 mapping), and MTRs. The OA patients were further categorized into mild, moderate, and severe OA.

Results

The mean T1 relaxation times of the four groups (normal, mild OA, moderate OA, and severe OA) were: 487.3?±?27.7, 458.0?±?55.9, 405.9?±?57.3, and 357.9?±?36.7 respectively (p?<0.001). The mean T2 relaxation times of the four groups were: 37.8?±?3.3, 44.0?±?8.5, 50.9?±?9.5, and 57.4?±?4.8 respectively (p?<?0.001). T1 relaxation time decreased and T2 relaxation time increased with worsening degeneration of patellar cartilage. The result of the covariance analysis showed that the covariate age had a significant influence on T2 relaxation time (p?<?0.001). No significant differences between the normal and OA groups using MTR were noted.

Conclusion

T1 and T2 relaxation times are relatively sensitive to early degenerative changes in the patellar cartilage, whereas the MTR may have some limitations with regard to early detection of OA. In addition, The T1 and T2 relaxation times negatively correlate with each other, which is a novel finding.     

The in vivo effects of unloading and compression on T1-Gd (dGEMRIC) relaxation times in healthy articular knee cartilage at 3.0 Tesla

Purpose

The purpose was to investigate the in vivo effects of unloading and compression on T1-Gd relaxation times in healthy articular knee cartilage.

Materials and methods

Ten volunteers were enrolled, and dGEMRIC images of their right knee joints were obtained using 3.0-T MR at three timepoints: directly following exercise (“baseline”), approximately 15 min after unloading (“unloading”) and during application of a compressive force (50% of the body weight) generated by a loading device via a footplate (“compression”).

Results

Our analysis of variance of pooled data from all cartilage zones demonstrated a significant mean T1-Gd decrease of 56.6 ms between baseline and compression (p?<?0.001), and a significant mean decrease of 42.1 ms between unloading and compression (p?<?0.001). No significant difference was found between baseline and unloading. Higher mean T1-Gd values were observed in the cartilage contact zone (central femoral and tibial zones; 698.3?±?162.2 ms) than in the non-contact zone (anterior and posterior femoral and tibial zones, and dorsal femoral zone; 662.9?±?149.3 ms; p?<?0.01).

Conclusion

T1-Gd times appear to be sensitive to mechanical cartilage stress, and thus, further studies are warranted that investigate the relationship between the biochemical load response and the biomechanical properties of articular cartilage.     

Comparison of 1.5- and 3-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee

Purpose

The aim of this prospective study was to compare routine MRI scans of the knee at 1.5 and 3 T obtained in the same individuals in terms of their performance in the diagnosis of cartilage lesions.

Methods

One hundred patients underwent MRI of the knee at 1.5 and 3 T and subsequent knee arthroscopy. All MR examinations consisted of multiplanar 2D turbo spin-echo sequences. Three radiologists independently graded all articular surfaces of the knee joint seen at MRI. With arthroscopy as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 1.5- and 3-T MRI for detecting cartilage lesions and the proportion of correctly graded cartilage lesions within the knee joint were determined and compared using resampling statistics.

Results

For all readers and surfaces combined, the respective sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting all grades of cartilage lesions in the knee joint using MRI were 60, 96, and 87 % at 1.5 T and 69, 96, and 90 % at 3 T. There was a statistically significant improvement in sensitivity (p < 0.05), but not specificity or accuracy (n.s.) for the detection of cartilage lesions at 3 T. There was also a statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in the proportion of correctly graded cartilage lesions at 3 T as compared to 1.5 T.

Conclusion

A 3-T MR protocol significantly improves diagnostic performance for the purpose of detecting cartilage lesions within the knee joint, when compared with a similar protocol performed at 1.5 T.

Level of evidence

III.     

Prevalence of cartilage lesions and early osteoarthritis in patients with patellar dislocation

Objectives

Assessment of cartilage lesions and osteoarthritis (OA) of the patellofemoral joint in patients following lateral patellar dislocation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

MR images of 129 knees (mean age 26?years, range 11–56) grouped as acute (A), recurrent (B), and chronic (C) dislocators were analysed regarding the prevalence and severity of patellofemoral cartilage lesions. Grades of OA were assessed using modified WORMS.

Results

In groups A, B, and C the prevalence of cartilage lesions was 71%, 82%, and 97%, respectively. Most lesions were located on the central patella in groups A and B (central 69% and 78%; medial 56% and 47%; lateral 31% and 42%), whereas group C revealed all regions affected (73%, 61%, and 67%). Of group A, 14% had mild OA and 64% of group B. Group C showed mild OA in 62% and moderate OA in 18%. Cartilage defect size and prevalence of OA was correlated with number of dislocations (r?=?0.41 and r?=?0.59; P?<?0.001).

Conclusions

Cartilage lesions and early OA are common after patellar dislocation and appear to increase with the frequency of dislocation. Both conditions should be considered when interpreting MRI in such patients, because of implications for treatment.

Key Points

? Cartilage lesions are very common after patellar dislocation. ? The severity of cartilage lesions increases with number of dislocations. ? Osteoarthritis is common after recurrent patellar dislocation, even in young patients. ? Detecting cartilage lesions is important after patellar dislocation.