The endovascular management of splenic artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of the endovascular treatment of splenic artery aneurysms (SAAs) and pseudoaneurysms (SAPAs). From April 2003 to December 2009, 12 patients (mean age 46.8 years, range 29-58) with SAAs (n = 9) or SAPAs (n = 3) underwent endovascular treatment. Four patients were asymptomatic and three had ruptured aneurysms. Lesions were in the proximal splenic artery (n = 3), intermediate splenic artery (n = 3) and distal splenic artery (n = 6). Endovascular procedures included embolization by sac packing (n = 5), sandwich occlusion of the splenic artery (n = 4) or stent graft deployment (n = 3). Computed tomography (CT) was done before the operation, 3 and 12 months after the operation, then yearly. Endovascular treatment was successful at the first attempt in all 12 (100%) patients, with complete angiographic exclusion of the aneurysm at the end of the operation. The mean amount of contrast medium used was 165 mL (range 100-230), and the mean total procedure time was 92 minutes (range 55-160). No major complications occurred. Postoperational CT scans showed splenic multisegmental infarcts in eight patients (66.7%, 8/12) and among them postembolization syndrome developed in six patients, manifesting as abdominal pain and fever. The mean follow-up was 32 months (range 9-51). No patient demonstrated gross evidence of aneurysm sac growth, and no significant decrease in aneurysm sac size postintervention was noted on follow-up. The endovascular management of SAAs and SAPAs is safe and effective and may induce less mortality than open surgery. Regardless of the etiology, endovascular treatment can provide excellent mid-term results.     

脾动脉瘤7例诊治分析

目的：探讨脾动脉瘤的诊断和手术治疗方法。方法：回顾性分析7 例脾动脉瘤患者的临床资料。结果：6例经彩色多普勒超声（B超）初步诊断;4例经CT动脉造影（CTA）,2例经数字减影血管造影术（DSA）,1例经磁共振造影（MRA）确诊;无1例依靠临床症状而确诊。单纯脾动脉瘤切除术1例,脾动脉瘤加脾脏切除术1例,脾动脉瘤切除加动脉重建术1例,动脉瘤近远端脾动脉结扎术1例,脾动脉瘤栓塞术2例,脾动脉瘤栓塞术加脾切除术1例。随访2个月至3年。无死亡及严重并发症病例。结论：脾动脉瘤依赖临床表现难以诊断,B超有筛选价值,CTA,MRA,DSA均有诊断价值。一旦确诊应尽早选择腔内介入栓塞治疗或手术方法。     

The endovascular management of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms

OBJECTIVE: Visceral artery aneurysms may be treated by aneurysm exclusion, excision, revascularization, and endovascular techniques. The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of the management of visceral artery aneurysms with catheter-based techniques. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2005, 90 patients were identified with a diagnosis of visceral artery aneurysm. This was inclusive of aneurysmal disease of the celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery (SMA), inferior mesenteric artery, and their branches. Surveillance without intervention occurred in 23 patients, and 19 patients underwent open aneurysm repair (4 ruptures). The endovascular treatment of 48 consecutive patients (mean age 58, 60% men) with 20 visceral artery aneurysms (VAA) and 28 visceral artery pseudoaneurysms (VAPA) was the basis for this study. Electronic and hardcopy medical records were reviewed for demographic data and clinical variables. Original computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopic imaging were evaluated. RESULTS: The endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms was technically successful in 98% of 48 procedures, consisting of 3 celiac axis repairs, 2 left gastric arteries, 1 SMA, 12 hepatic arteries, 20 splenic arteries, 7 gastroduodenal arteries, 1 middle colic artery, and 2 pancreaticoduodenal arteries. Of these, 29 (60%) were performed for symptomatic disease (5 ruptured aneurysms). Procedures were performed in the endovascular suite under local anesthesia with conscious sedation (94%). The femoral artery was used as the preferential access site (90%). Coil embolization was used for aneurysm exclusion in 96%. N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (glue) was used selectively (19%) using a triaxial system with a 3F microcatheter for persistent flow or multiple branches. The 30-day mortality was 8.3% (n = 4). One patient died from recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding after gastroduodenal embolization, and the remaining died of unrelated causes. All perioperative deaths occurred in patients requiring urgent or emergent intervention in the setting of hemodynamic instability. No patients undergoing elective intervention died in the periprocedural period. Postprocedural imaging was performed after 77% of interventions at a mean of 16 months. Complete exclusion of flow within the aneurysm sac occurred in 97% interventions with follow-up imaging, but coil and glue artifact complicated CT evaluation. Postembolization syndrome developed in three patients (6%) after splenic artery embolization. There was no evidence of hepatic insufficiency or bowel ischemia after either hepatic or mesenteric artery aneurysm treatment. Three patients required secondary interventions for persistent flow (n = 1) and recurrent bleeding from previously embolized aneurysms (n = 2). CONCLUSION: Visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms can be successfully treated with endovascular means with low periprocedural morbidity; however, the urgent repair of these lesions is still associated with elevated mortality rates. Aneurysm exclusion can be accomplished with coil embolization and the selective use of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. Current catheter-based techniques extend our ability to exclude visceral artery aneurysms, but imaging artifact hampers postoperative CT surveillance.     

Splenic artery aneurysms: postembolization syndrome and surgical complications

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the endovascular embolization of splenic artery aneurysms and false aneurysms with special consideration given to postoperative complications. METHODS: Fifteen patients (11 women; mean age, 56 y; range, 39-80 y) with splenic artery aneurysm (n = 13) or false aneurysm (n = 2) were treated with coil embolization. The lesion was asymptomatic in 9 patients, symptomatic in 5 patients, and ruptured in 1 patient. The mean aneurysm diameter was 33 +/- 23 mm (range, 15-80 mm). Postoperative follow-up evaluation included a clinical visit and spiral computed tomography at 1, 4, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Endovascular treatment was possible in 14 patients (93%) (1 failure: neck cannulation). Perioperative mortality was not observed. Morbidity included postembolization syndrome in 5 patients (30%). Neither pancreatitis nor spleen abscess occurred. The mean follow-up period was 36 months (range, 3-60 mo). During follow-up evaluation we detected 1 sac reperfusion that was sealed successfully with additional coils. Surgical conversion or open repair were never required. CONCLUSIONS: At our institute, endovascular treatment represents the first-line treatment for splenic artery aneurysms. Postembolization syndrome and infarcts are common events but generally resolve without sequelae.     

Visceral artery aneurysms: a single center experience

BACKGROUND: Splanchnic artery areurysm is a rare but clinically relevant disease, showing a high mortality rate in emergency surgery. Reports on splanchnic aneurysms are rare and often anecdotal. The aim of this study is to discuss data obtained from 16 patients in a single vascular surgery center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1987 and December 2000, 16 patients underwent surgery for splanchnic artery aneurysms. In 13 patients the localization was single (in two associated with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm) and in 3 patients multiple. The arteries involved were: splenic (8), hepatic (4), celiac (3), superior mesenteric (3), ileocolic (2), and pancreatoduodenal (1). 13 patients were asymptomatic and 3 presentec with abdominal pain. All patients underwent CT scan, and abdominal aortic and selective visceral artery angiography. Before surgery, all patients underwent cerebral MR or cerebral CT scan. 13 patients underwent open vascular surgery; 3 patients (2 splenic and 1 hepatic) underwent endovascular procedure (angioembolization). Histological examination of the aneurysmal wall was obtained in 14 patients. Ultrasound examination was performed after 6 months, then yearly. 14 patients underwent abdominal CT scan during the long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality was absent. 12 cases were classified as displastic, with minor or major secondary atherosclerotic changes, and in many cases severe calcications. 2 cases were classified as atherosclerotic. Cerebral MR did not show any cases of intracerebral displastric aneurismal disease. One patient was lost at follow-up after 9 years. One patient showed a recurrence at 6 years (superior mesenteric artery): the patient underwent a new surgical procedure and died 20 days after surgery for intestinal infarction. All abdominal follow-up CT scans show good results of the vascular reconstruction and escluded other new visceral or aortic aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Visceral artery aneurysms are an uncommon form of abdominal vascular disease showing a high postoperative mortality rate in emergencies. Surgery, and in selected cases, endovascular treatment, can successfully manage splanchnic artery aneurysms with few complications and low recurrence.     

Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: long-term imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term results of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs) with the aid of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. METHODS: Between January 1998 and August 2001, 92 patients with 92 aneurysms treated by endovascular coiling with GDCs underwent contrast-enhanced MR angiography. These patients underwent long-term follow-up (range 32-78 months, mean 42.1 +/- 11.9 months [standard deviation]) after endovascular treatment. All images were compared with digital subtraction angiograms and contrast-enhanced MR angiograms that had been obtained during the short-term follow-up (range 5-25 months, mean 13 +/- 5.1 months after treatment). The MR angiograms were analyzed independently by 2 senior radiologists. Findings were assigned to 1 of 3 categories: complete obliteration (Class 1), residual neck (Class 2), or residual aneurysm (Class 3). RESULTS: Of 92 contrast-enhanced MR angiograms obtained at the long-term follow-up, complete obliteration of the aneurysm was noted in 57 patients (Class 1), a residual neck was seen in 22 (Class 2), and a residual aneurysm was observed in 13 (Class 3). One patient experienced aneurysm rehemorrhaging during the follow-up period. The comparison of short- and long-term follow-up angiograms demonstrated a change in aneurysm classification in 7 patients (7.6%), including 4 that progressed from Class 1 to Class 2 and 3 from Class 2 to Class 3. However, 4 (14.2%) of the 28 long-term recurrences were not detected on the short-term control images. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography after selective embolization of intracranial aneurysms can identify late aneurysm recanalization that is undetected at short-term follow-up.     

Ancillary techniques to facilitate endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms.

PURPOSE: The ability to treat abdominal aortoiliac aneurysms and thoracic aortic aneurysms may be limited by coexisting arterial disease. Device deployment may be impaired by occlusive disease and tortuosity of the arteries used to access the aneurysm or by suitability of the implantation sites. In this study we describe the auxiliary procedures performed to circumvent these obstacles and thereby enable endovascular aneurysm repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 1999, 390 patients treated for aneurysm of the aorta with endovascular devices were entered prospectively in a vascular registry. Fifty (12%) of the 390 patients required adjunctive surgical techniques to (1) create or extend the length of the proximal or distal device implantation site or (2) permit device navigation through diseased iliac arteries. Auxiliary techniques used to extend or enhance implantation sites were elephant trunk graft (n = 2), the construction of renovisceral bypass grafts (n = 1), and subclavian artery transposition (n = 2). Plication of the common iliac artery at its bifurcation was performed in conjunction with femorofemoral bypass graft in nine patients to allow preservation of pelvic circulation by avoiding internal iliac artery sacrifice. Construction of a bypass graft to transpose the internal iliac artery orifice was performed in one patient. The auxiliary techniques used to facilitate device navigation were iliac artery angioplasty or stenting (n = 8), external iliac artery endovascular endarterectomy or straightening (n = 14), endoluminal iliofemoral bypass conduit (n = 5), and the construction of an open iliofemoral bypass conduit (n = 8). RESULTS: Successful deployment of the endovascular devices was achieved in 49 (98%) of 50 patients. Auxiliary techniques were successful in providing access for endovascular device deployment in all 35 patients (100%). Mean follow-up for techniques to facilitate device navigation is 26 months for endovascular procedures and 42 months for the open bypass graft construction patients; no occlusions were observed at this moment. There were five patients with incisional hematomas that did not necessitate intervention. Fourteen (94%) of 15 patients underwent successful device implantation after the auxiliary maneuvers to enhance implantation site. Mean follow-up for implantation site manipulation is 28 months. One of the subclavian transpositions had a new onset of Horner's syndrome, two of nine patients who had common iliac artery ligated had retroperitoneal hematomas that did not necessitate interventions, and no colon ischemia was seen. The patient who underwent nonanatomic bypass grafting of viscero-renal arteries had a retroperitoneal hematoma that necessitated reexploration. CONCLUSIONS: Significant coexisting arterial disease may be encountered in patients with aortic or iliac aneurysms. Identification of coexisting arterial diseases is essential to help tailor the appropriate supplemental surgical procedure to allow the performance of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients who would otherwise require open surgical repair.     

Endovascular treatment of very small intracranial aneurysms

BACKGROUND: The treatment of very small cerebral aneurysms with maximal diameter less than 3 mm remains a challenge for endovascular and surgical treatment. Endovascular treatment of these lesions may be difficult and associated with high risk of complications because of their small size. Our purpose was to assess the feasibility and results of endovascular treatment of these lesions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of our experience and results of endovascular treatments for a series of 11 consecutive patients with 11 very small aneurysms. Of 11 aneurysms, 10 were acutely ruptured, and 1 was unruptured with a previous subarachnoid hemorrhage from another aneurysm. Aneurysms were located at the internal carotid artery (n = 4), the anterior communicating artery (n = 6), and the vertebral artery (n = 1). Seven patients were treated with coil embolization, and remodeling technique was used in 1 case. Three cases underwent intravascular stent implantation. Coil packing was done after in 2 of 3 aneurysms, and stent implantation alone was used in the remaining aneurysm. RESULTS: Coil embolization and stent deployment were carried out without difficulty in all cases. Coil packing was not available after stent implantation in 1 case for unsuccessful navigation of microcatheter into the aneurysm sac. Immediate angiography demonstrated complete occlusion in 10 cases and nearly complete occlusion in 1 case with stent implantation alone. No stent thrombosis and aneurysmal rupture was encountered during treatment. With the exception of 1 patient (Hunt and Hess grade 4) who died of pneumonia 4 weeks after treatment, no clinical evidence of neurologic deterioration and hemorrhagic complication was seen during the follow-up period in the remaining 10 patients. Follow-up angiography for 3 to 12 months (mean, 5.3 months) was available in 6 (60%) of 10 surviving patients, and no aneurysm recanalization was found. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment may be a feasible and effective therapeutic alternative for very small aneurysms. The long-term efficacy and durability of endovascular treatment for these lesions remains to be determined in a large series.     

经导管弹簧圈栓塞治疗脾动脉瘤

目的探讨经导管弹簧圈栓塞治疗脾动脉瘤的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析接受经导管弹簧圈栓塞治疗的18例脾动脉瘤患者的资料,其中真性脾动脉瘤14例,假性脾动脉瘤4例;近端型6例,中间型4例,脾门型8例。根据患者脾动脉造影情况,选择普通弹簧圈、微弹簧圈或机械可脱式弹簧圈进行栓塞。术后1周及1、3、9个月行CT增强或CTA复查,随后每月行电话随访。结果对18例均顺利完成手术,11例采用隔绝旷置术,4例采用瘤腔填塞术,3例采用隔绝旷置术+瘤腔填塞术。术后12例出现栓塞后综合征,其中8例出现不同程度的脾梗死,梗死体积约10%~35%;余4例为轻微并发症。随访中无瘤体增大、破裂或复发及相关并发症。结论经导管弹簧圈栓塞治疗脾动脉瘤简单可行、安全有效。     

Repair of juxtarenal para-anastomotic aortic aneurysms after previous open repair with fenestrated and branched endovascular stent grafts

Three patients with juxtarenal para-anastomotic aortic aneurysms after previous open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were treated with custom-designed fenestrated and branched Zenith endovascular stent grafts. Six renal arteries and two superior mesenteric arteries were targeted for incorporation by graft fenestrations and branches. The fenestration/renal ostium interface was secured with balloon-expandable Genesis stents (n = 5) or Jostent stent grafts (n = 1). Completion angiography demonstrated no endoleaks and antegrade perfusion in all target vessels. During follow-up, one patient developed asymptomatic renal artery occlusion and underwent further endovascular intervention for type I distal endoleak. Computed tomography at 12 months demonstrated complete aneurysm exclusion in all patients with antegrade perfusion in the remaining target vessels. Fenestrated and branched endovascular stent grafts may be an acceptable alternative to conventional open repair in this group of patients.     

Follow-up angiography of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular placement of Guglielmi detachable coils

OBJECTIVE: The success of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs) is dependent on the long-term exclusion of the aneurysm from the circulation. We reviewed our experience with the long-term angiographic follow-up monitoring of aneurysms that had been treated with GDCs. METHODS: All patients whose aneurysms had been treated with GDCs between January 1995 and August 1999 and who subsequently underwent follow-up angiography at 6 months or more were included in this study. We reviewed all of the angiographic findings, to determine the percentage of aneurysm occlusion on the initial angiograms and on the last available follow-up angiograms. The categories of aneurysm occlusion used were 100%, >or=95%, and less than 95% occlusion. RESULTS: One hundred thirty patients with 141 aneurysms underwent 143 endovascular coiling procedures and subsequently underwent angiographic follow-up monitoring of 6 months or more. There were 102 female and 28 male patients. The mean angiographic follow-up period was 16.7 months (range, 6-62 mo). The initial rates of occlusion were 100% for 56 aneurysms (39%), >or=95% for 65 aneurysms (46%), and less than 95% for 22 aneurysms (15%). Recurrence of one aneurysm (1.8%) was observed. Of the 87 aneurysms that were incompletely occluded initially, there was progressive thrombosis in 40 (46%), stable neck remnants in 23 (26%), and enlargement of the residual neck in 24 (28%). The final occlusion rates, determined on the last available angiograms, were 100% for 88 aneurysms (61%), >or=95% for 31 aneurysms (22%), and less than 95% for 24 aneurysms (17%). No patient experienced repeat or new subarachnoid hemorrhage more than 6 months after the initial treatment. CONCLUSION: Late angiographic follow-up monitoring of aneurysms that have been treated with GDCs demonstrates the durability of the treatment. Aneurysms with large residual neck remnants were subjected to further treatment, whereas aneurysms with small residual neck remnants remain under observation.     

血管内介入治疗腹腔内脏动脉瘤11例经验

目的评价介入治疗腹腔内脏动脉瘤的安全性和疗效。方法用介入技术治疗腹腔内脏动脉瘤11例,包括脾动脉瘤5例,胃-十二指肠动脉瘤5例,肠系膜上动脉(SMA)瘤1例。5例以假性动脉瘤破裂出血就诊,3例表现为上腹部疼痛和搏动性包块,3例无自觉症状。10例用血管内栓塞术,1例发自SMA的动脉瘤用联合动脉内栓塞和被覆膜支架置入术治疗。结果11例均治疗成功,无并发症。5例以出血为首发症状者,术后出血立即停止。1例SMA动脉瘤术后被完全封闭,主干及分支显影正常。3例术前有症状者术后腹痛逐渐消失、包块缩小。随访4～52个月(平均25.5个月),未发生与动脉瘤相关的并发症,超声波检查无动脉瘤复发表现。结论血管内介入技术是治疗腹腔内脏动脉瘤的安全有效方法。     

Midterm results of endovascular stented grafts for the treatment of isolated iliac artery aneurysms.

PURPOSE: Isolated aneurysms of the iliac arteries are uncommon lesions that require surgical repair to prevent rupture. METHODS: During a 4-year period, we used endovascular stented grafts (EGs) to treat 28 iliac artery aneurysms that were not associated with aortic aneurysms. Twenty-five patients, with a total of 24 common iliac (15 right, nine left) and four internal iliac (two right, two left) artery aneurysms, underwent endovascular grafting. There were 24 men and 1 woman, with a mean age of 74 years (range, 51 to 88 years). Combined common and internal iliac artery aneurysms were present in three patients. Nineteen patients who underwent treatment with EGs were administered epidural anesthesia (22 epidural, two local, one general). Before surgery, one patient had lower extremity embolization and ischemia from the aneurysm, three had abdominal or back pain, and the remaining were asymptomatic. The EGs were constructed of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts and balloon expandable stents. RESULTS: Four procedure-related complications (12%) occurred (distal extremity embolization, n = 1; wound complications, n = 2; colonic mucosal ischemia, n = 1). Only a minimal reduction in the aneurysmal diameter was seen in 90% of the iliac artery aneurysms treated. The remaining lesions showed no change in size, and no aneurysm had an increase in cross-sectional diameter on computed tomographic images enduring a follow-up period up to 4 years (mean, 24 months). One aneurysm ruptured after successful endovascular exclusion, and the patient underwent treatment with open repair. The 3-year primary patency rate of iliac EGs was 86%. CONCLUSION: EGs appear to show satisfactory safety and efficacy for the repair of isolated aneurysms of the iliac arteries.     

Midterm experience with the endovascular treatment of isolated iliac aneurysms.

PURPOSE: This report describes our 5-year experience with the endovascular repair of isolated iliac aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. METHODS: Between June 1993 and July 1998, 40 isolated iliac aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms were treated with endovascular grafts in 39 patients. Thirty-seven aneurysms were treated with endovascular grafts composed of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts and balloon expandable stents, and the other three underwent repair with a polycarbonate urethane endoluminal graft. RESULTS: All the patients underwent initially successful endovascular treatment of isolated iliac aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms and were followed from 1 to 51 months (mean, 18 months). The 4-year primary patency rate was 94.5% +/- 10%. The perioperative complications included one episode of distal embolization, an episode of colonic ischemia, five episodes of kinking or compression of the endovascular graft, and one early postoperative graft thrombosis. There was only one perioperative death in a patient whose aneurysm ruptured in the operating room just before endovascular repair. The median postoperative length of hospital stay was 3.0 +/- 1.3 days in this group of patients at moderate and high risk. The long-term complications included one graft thrombosis and two endoleaks. One small endoleak was followed until the patient died of unrelated causes, and the other one led to aneurysm rupture in the only patient temporarily lost to follow-up examination. This patient successfully underwent treatment in the standard open surgical fashion. To date, all the other aneurysms have remained stable or have decreased in size during the follow-up examinations with duplex or contrast-enhanced computed tomographic scans. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair of iliac aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms is a safe and effective technique with good midterm results in patients at standard and high risk. These grafts are particularly beneficial for patients with medical, surgical, or anatomic contraindications for open surgical repair.     

Is Endovascular Therapy the Preferred Treatment for All Visceral Artery Aneurysms?

Endovascular intervention can provide an alternative method of treatment for visceral artery aneurysms. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with visceral artery aneurysms at a single university medical center from 1990 to 2003, focusing on the outcome of endovascular therapy. Sixty-five patients with visceral artery aneurysms were identified: 39 splenic (SAA), 13 renal, seven celiac, three superior mesenteric (SMA), and three hepatic. Eleven patients (16.9%) had symptoms attributable to their aneurysms, which included a total of four ruptures (6.2%): three splenic and one hepatic. Management consisted of 18 (27.7%) endovascular interventions, nine (13.9%) open surgical repairs, and 38 (58.5%) observations. Mean aneurysm diameter for patients treated expectantly was significantly less than for those who underwent intervention (p = 0.001). Endovascular interventions included 15 (83.3%) embolizations (11 SAA, three renal, one hepatic) and three (16.7%) stent grafts (two SMA, one renal). The initial technical success rate of the endovascular procedures was 94.4% (17/18). However, there were four patients (22.2%) with major endovascular procedure-related complications: one late recurrence requiring open surgical repair, two large symptomatic splenic infarcts, and one episode of severe pancreatitis. These four patients had distal splenic artery aneurysms at or adjacent to the splenic hilum. There were no endovascular procedure-related deaths. Reasons for performing open surgical repair included three SAA ruptures diagnosed at laparotomy and complex anatomy not amenable to endovascular intervention (six patients). One surgical patient had a postoperative small bowel obstruction treated nonoperatively; and there was one perioperative death in a patient operated on emergently for rupture. Endovascular management of visceral artery aneurysms is a reasonable alternative to open surgical repair in carefully selected patients. Individual anatomic considerations play an important role in determining the best treatment strategy if intervention is warranted. However, four of 11 (36.4%) patients with distal splenic artery aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization developed major complications. Based on our experience, traditional surgical treatment of SAA with repair or ligation and concomitant splenectomy when necessary may be preferred in these cases.Presented at the Twenty-ninth Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Anaheim, CA, June 4, 2004.     

Transposition of the supraaortic branches for extended endovascular arch repair.

BACKGROUND: Supraaortic branches limit extended application of endovascular aortic repair. For this purpose, we applied extensive reconstructions. METHODS: Between October 2002 and March 2005, 11 patients (mean age 72.3 years) presented with acute or chronic aortic diseases originating from the aortic arch (arch aneurysms n=8, type B dissections n=3). Treatment was by autologous sequential transposition of the left carotid artery into the brachiocephalic trunk and of the left subclavian artery into the already transposed left common carotid artery in nine patients and by additional reconstruction of the brachiocephalic trunk in two patients. Endovascular stent-graft placement was successfully performed thereafter. RESULTS: Procedure-related mortality was 0%. At completion angiography, all reconstructions were fully patent. One patient had a small type Ia endoleak that resolved spontaneously within one week. Mean follow-up was 18 months (1-29 months). One patient underwent redo stent-graft placement after 25 months due to a type III endoleak. The remaining patients had normal follow-up CT scans with regular perfusion of the supraaortic branches without any signs of endoleaks. CONCLUSIONS: Extended application of this technique will enable safe and effective treatment of a highly selected group of patients by avoiding conventional repair.     

Midterm results of endoluminal stent grafting of the thoracic aorta

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall outcome of repair of thoracic aortic lesions with endoluminal grafts. Patients were studied prospectively following the implantation of a thoracic endovascular device. Preoperative imaging was performed by helical computed tomography (CT), angiography, transesophageal ultrasonography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Procedures were performed in an endovascular surgical suite under general anesthesia. All patients were evaluated with CT and chest radiography at discharge and at 1, 6, and 12 months. From December 1999 to November 2001, thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study (mean age 62 years; 20 male and 12 female patients). Seventeen patients had dissections, five patients had ruptured aortic ulcer, five patients had traumatic ruptures, three patients had atherosclerotic aneurysms, and two patients had pseudoaneurysms. An American Society of Anesthesiology score of III or IV was evaluated in 22 (69%) patients. The procedure was performed under emergency conditions in 11 cases. All prostheses were implanted successfully. There were no conversions. Three patients (9%) presented with a neurologic event following the implantation procedure, which was lethal in one case (hemorrhagic stroke). Two other patients died during early follow-up of myocardial infarction and multiorgan failure. The early death rate was 9%. The mean follow-up was 13.5 months. During follow-up, the maximal diameter of the aorta shrunk (> or = 5 mm) in 9 (28%) patients, remained stable in 17 (53%) patients, and increased (> or = 5 mm) in 6 (19%) patients. All patients presenting with an increased diameter were initially treated for dissections. A type 1 endoleak was diagnosed on the discharge CT scan in one patient. It sealed spontaneously thereafter. A type 3 endoleak was diagnosed 3 months after the procedure in one patient. A complementary stent graft was implanted in two patients presenting with a dissection with persistent patent false lumen and aortic enlargement. Three patients died during follow-up (two aneurysm-related and one aneurysm-unrelated death). The morbidity and mortality rates reported in our series related to the preoperative morbid conditions of the patients treated. Thoracic aorta endografting is an alternative to open surgery in this subset of patients.     

Hepatic and splenic artery aneurysms

Accounting for 80% of all visceral artery aneurysms, splenic and hepatic artery lesions are rare but potentially life threatening. Although their natural history has not been well-defined, the high mortality associated with emergent repair suggests an aggressive approach is indicated. While repair is clearly mandated in patients with a symptomatic aneurysm or contained rupture, the following asymptomatic lesions also warrant intervention: (1) splenic artery aneurysms in patients with the potential to become pregnant or requiring liver transplantation, (2) hepatic aneurysms in patients with polyarteritis nodosa or fibromuscular dysplasia, (3) splenic or hepatic artery aneurysms greater than 2.0 cm in diameter, and (4) splenic or hepatic pseudoaneurysms. Although open surgical interventions have traditionally been the mainstay of therapy, endovascular techniques have increasingly been applied to this problem. Dictated predominately by the need to maintain distal end-organ perfusion, potential therapies include open surgical ligation, autogenous reconstruction, endovascular coil embolization, or percutaneous endograft placement. While offering alternative approaches, endovascular techniques have not dramatically altered the risk-to-benefit ratio in asymptomatic lesions, and both open and percutaneous approaches present viable options for elective repair. Although explored in only a limited number of patients, the application of endovascular techniques to the symptomatic patient offers the greatest potential for significant improvements in morbidity and mortality.     

颅内外动脉狭窄合并颅内动脉瘤同期血管内治疗的效果分析

目的探讨同期治疗颅内外动脉狭窄合并颅内动脉瘤的策略及临床效果。方法回顾性分析2013年4月至2018年9月于北京大学第一医院神经外科行同期血管内治疗的15例颅内外动脉狭窄合并颅内动脉瘤患者的临床资料。男性6例,女性9例,年龄(63.9±9.1)岁(范围:43~79岁);动脉狭窄部位共15处,狭窄程度为75%~95%,其中前循环8处,后循环7处;动脉瘤共17个,最大径(5.3±1.2)mm(范围:3~7 mm),其中前循环动脉瘤11个、后循环动脉瘤6个。患者均行同期动脉狭窄支架成形及动脉瘤栓塞术治疗。记录患者围手术期及术后临床症状、影像学资料及并发症情况。结果15处动脉狭窄均成功置入支架(残余狭窄<30%);17个动脉瘤中,10个行单纯弹簧圈栓塞,7个行支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞,均完全栓塞。围手术期1例患者出现轻微脑梗死症状,其余未发生手术相关并发症。术后随访(43.8±8.2)个月(范围:24~85个月),患者术后6~12个月均复查数字减影血管造影,其中2例出现无症状性支架内再狭窄,所有动脉瘤未见复发。截至末次随访时,患者均未出现颅内出血、缺血性卒中等相关症状。结论颅内外动脉狭窄合并颅内动脉瘤应根据血管狭窄的部位、程度及动脉瘤的大小、形态、位置、数量及两者的位置关系等因素综合分析,制定个体化的治疗策略,给予同期血管内治疗可能是一种安全、有效的治疗方法。     

Endovascular and Surgical Treatment of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Assessment of Post-treatment Clinical Outcome

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are the most commonly encountered vascular malformation of the spinal cord and a treatable cause of progressive para- or tetraplegia. It is an elusive pathology that tends to be under-diagnosed, due to lack of awareness among clinicians, and affects males more commonly than females, typically between the fifth and eighth decades. Early diagnosis and treatment may significantly improve outcome and prevent permanent disability and even mortality. The purpose of our retrospective, single-center study was to determine the long-term clinical and radiographic outcome of patients who have received endovascular or surgical treatment of a spinal DAVF. In particular, during a 6-year period (2009–2014) 14 patients with a spinal DAVF were treated at our department either surgically (n = 4) or endovascularly (n = 10) with detachable coils and/or glue. There was no recurrence in the follow-up period (mean: 36 months, range 3–60 months) after complete occlusion with the endovascular treatment (n = 9; 90%), while only one patient (10%) had residual flow both post-treatment and at 3-month follow-up. All four surgically treated patients (100%) had no signs of residual DAVF on follow-up magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and/or angiography (mean follow-up period of 9 months). Since improvement or stabilization of symptoms may be seen even in patients with delayed diagnosis and substantial neurological deficits, either endovascular or surgical treatment is always justified.