Evaluation of the Efficacy of Polidocanol in the Form of Foam Compared With Liquid Form in Sclerotherapy of the Greater Saphenous Vein: Initial Results

BACKGROUND: Foamed sclerosing agents have been used with enthusiasm by phlebologists for more than 5 decades. Any type of varicose veins can and has been treated with this technique. Numerous publications have stressed the advantages of foamed sclerosing agents on the basis of empiric and experimental criteria and have described various individual techniques to prepare foams. Until now, however, no comparative study for the treatment of large varicose veins with foam or liquid exists. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this first randomized, prospective, multicenter trial was to study the elimination of reflux, the rate of recanalization, and possible side effects of foam sclerotherapy (FS) compared with conventional liquid sclerotherapy for the greater saphenous vein (GSV). METHODS: Eighty-eight patients were randomized into two groups: One group was treated with sclerosing foam (45 patients) and the other with sclerosing liquid (43 cases). Sclerotherapy was performed with direct puncture of the vessel under duplex guidance. The reference sclerosing agent was polidocanol in a 3% solution. The foam was prepared using the Double Syringe System (DSS) method. Only one injection of 2.0 or 2.5 mL liquid or foam was allowed, depending on the diameter of the GSV. Results were assessed according to the protocol. RESULTS: Follow-up after 3 weeks showed 84% elimination of reflux in the GSV with DSS foam versus 40% with liquid sclerosant (P < 0.01). At 6 months, six recanalizations were found in the liquid group versus two in the foam group. After 1 year, no additional recanalization was observed with either foam or liquid. Longer term studies are underway. Side effects did not differ between both groups. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of sclerosing foam (DSS) compared with sclerosing liquid in therapy of the GSV is superior, a finding that had already gained empirical recognition but for which there has not been any clinical evidence to date.     

导管引导下泡沫硬化剂疗法治疗大隐静脉曲张

目的 探讨导管引导下的泡沫硬化剂疗法治疗下肢静脉曲张的临床效果.方法 选择2008年4月至8月间有微创治疗意愿的30例(条)中重度下肢静脉曲张患者.其中男性11例,女性19例;年龄34-85岁,平均年龄52岁.病史2～30年,平均20年.对其进行导管引导下患肢大隐静脉主干内注射1%聚桂醇泡沫硬化剂,观察大隐静脉主干的闭合情况.结果 30条患肢均在导管引导下成功注射硬化剂,平均每条患肢应用6.2 ml泡沫硬化剂,27条(90%)大隐静脉主干治疗后即刻可见反流消失.术后早期大隐静脉走行轻微浅静脉炎5例(条),2周内自行缓解,无严重的并发症发生.平均随访3个月,27例患者下肢活动后酸胀、乏力感消失,下肢明显的曲张畸形静脉消失;27条患肢(90%)于治疗后2周、3个月后复诊血管超声时大隐静脉主干闭塞.4例(条)患者(15%)仅有小腿局限的轻度曲张.结论 导管引导的泡沫硬化剂疗法治疗下肢静脉曲张的大隐静脉主干闭合率较高,是微创治疗下肢静脉曲张有效的新方法.     

Comparison of 1% and 3% polidocanol foam in ultrasound guided sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein: a randomised, double-blind trial with 2 year-follow-up. "The 3/1 Study".

OBJECTIVES: To compare 1% and 3% POL foam in treating the great saphenous vein (GSV) by ultrasound guided sclerotherapy. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective, randomised, double-blind trial with 2 year-follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 148 patients with GSV reflux (saphenous trunk diameter 4-8 mm) were randomised to undergo ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy using either 1% or 3% POL foam in a single session. Foam production was standardised using a sterile disposable syringe kit including sterile air and the Turbofoam machine. Duplex ultrasonography was used to assess the outcome at 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months and 2 years. The main criterion of success was the disappearance of the venous reflux. The length of occlusion of the vein (only measured at 3 week-echography assessment) was a secondary criterion. Side effects were assessed. RESULTS: 74 patients were included in each group. The mean volume of foam injected was 4.4 ml for the 3% group and 4.6 ml for the 1% group. After 3 weeks, reflux was abolished in 96% (71 patients) of the 3% group and 88% (68 patients) of the 1% group (NS). The mean occlusion length of the vein was 38 cm for the 3% group and 34 for the 1% group (NS). After 2-years, reflux was absent in 69% of the 3% group and 68% of the 1% group (NS). 14 patients were lost to follow-up at 2 years. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates equivalent efficacy for 1% POL and 3% POL foam in sclerotherapy of the GSV where the trunk is less than 8 mm in diameter. These data obtained two years of follow-up confirm our previously reported 6 month-follow-up data published in 2005.     

Comparative Study of Duplex-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy and Duplex-Guided Liquid Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Superficial Venous Insufficiency

PURPOSE: To compare the preliminary results of hemodynamic changes between duplex-guided foam sclerotherapy and duplex-guided liquid sclerotherapy. METHODS: Seventy Seven limbs in 77 patients with isolated greater saphenous vein incompetence were treated with duplex-guided sclerotherapy. Thirty Seven limbs were treated with duplex-guided foam sclerotherapy and the remaining 40 limbs were treated with duplex-guided liquid sclerotherapy. Pretreatment exam was performed using a color duplex scanner and air plethysmography. The sclerosing foam was produced by Tessari's method using 1% and 3% polidocanol. The varicose vein was injected with 2 mL of 1% polidocanol or 1% polidocanol foam, and then 1 mL of 3% polidocanol or 3% polidocanol foam was injected into the greater saphenous vein under duplex guidance. Venous obstruction and recanalization were screened by serial posttreatment duplex examination, and posttreatment air plethysmography analysis was performed 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the sclerotherapy. RESULTS: Duplex scanning demonstrated complete occlusion in the greater saphenous vein for duplex-guided foam sclerotherapy in 25 limbs (67.6%), which was a significantly higher proportion than for the duplex-guided liquid sclerotherapy (7 limbs, 17.5%, p<0.0001). Recurrent varicose veins were found in 3 patient (8.1%) in the duplex-guided foam sclerotherapy group and 10 (25%) in the duplex-guided liquid sclerotherapy group at 1-year (p=0.048). In duplex-guided foam sclerotherapy, venous filling index values remained normal during the subsequent follow-up examinations, whereas in duplex-guided liquid sclerotherapy, venous filling index began to increase, and there was a significant difference at 6 months between duplex-guided foam sclerotherapy and the duplex-guided liquid sclerotherapy (p<0.0005). At 9 months, there was a significant difference in the residual venous fraction between the two groups, and the residual venous fraction value continued to improve in duplex-guided foam sclerotherapy (p=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Duplex-guided foam sclerotherapy could have greater promise compared to duplex-guided liquid sclerotherapy in the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency.     

Catheter-Assisted Vein Sclerotherapy: A New Approach for Sclerotherapy of the Greater Saphenous Vein with a Double-Lumen Balloon Catheter

OBJECTIVE: We sought to optimize sclerotherapy of the greater saphenous vein (GSV) by targeted application of foamed sclerosant by using a catheter. METHODS: We designed a new double-lumen catheter that is inserted into the GSV. Via one lumen, a balloon at the tip of the catheter can be inflated to stop the blood flow. Via the second lumen, the sclerosing agent can be injected and aspirated. This method enabled us to perform a targeted application of the sclerosing agent [catheter-assisted vein sclerotherapy (KAVS)]. In an open study, outpatients suffering from varicosis of the GSV received a foam sclerotherapy under ultrasound guidance, using the newly developed KAVS catheter. RESULTS: Thirty patients with an insufficiency (reflux) of the GSV were treated with the newly developed KAVS method using foamed polidocanol. The intervention was well tolerated in all patients without the occurrence of serious side effects. In 27 of the 30 treated patients (90%), we found a closure of the GSV at control visits 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The KAVS method represents a feasible approach for sclerotherapy of the GSV. The efficiency and treatment modalities need to be explored in further studies.     

Prospective randomised comparative study of visual foam sclerotherapy alone or in combination with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for treatment of superficial venous insufficiency: preliminary report

ObjectiveThe aim of the study is to compare ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS: injection of foam sclerosant under ultrasound guidance) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) combined with visual foam sclerotherapy (VFS: injection of foam sclerosant under visual control) for varicose tributary veins and VFS alone in the treatment of GSV reflux.Design and methodsA total of 133 limbs in 97 patients with GSV reflux were randomised to receive either VFS alone or VFS combined with UGFS. In both groups, 1% polidocanol foam was used. Assessments included duplex ultrasonography, evaluation of Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSS) and CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, and pathophysiologic) scores. Ultrasonographic inspection of the foam in the GSV was carried out during 5 min before compression was applied. The primary ‘end’ point of the study was obliteration of the GSV at 6 months.ResultsA total of 51 limbs in 48 patients were treated with UGFS + VFS and the remaining 52 limbs in 49 patients were treated with VFS alone. There were no significant inter-group differences in patient age, male: female ratio, height, weight, body mass index, CEAP clinical scores or VCSS. The GSV diameter was 6.0 ± 1.7 mm (median ± interquartile range) in the UGFS + VFS group and 5.7 ± 1.6 mm in the VFS group (p = 0.419). The mean injected volume of foam for varicose tributary veins was 4 ± 2 ml in the UGFS + VFS group and 6 ± 2 ml in the VFS group, a significantly higher amount of foam being used in the latter (p < 0.001). However, the mean total amount of foam was greater in limbs treated with UFGS + VFS than in those treated with VFS alone (p = 0.017). Ultrasonographic inspection revealed complete vasospasm of the GSV in 37 (72.5%) limbs in the UGFS + VFS group and 29 (55.8%) in the VFS group during sclerotherapy (p = 0.097). At 6-month follow-up, complete occlusion was found in 23 limbs (45.1%) treated with UGFS + VFS and in 22 limbs (42.3%) treated with VFS. The difference between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.775). Reflux was absent in 30 limbs (58.8%) treated with UGFS + VFS and in 37 (71.2%) treated with VFS (p = 0.190). There was no inter-group difference in post-treatment VCSS (p = 0.223).ConclusionsThese results show that UGFS + VFS and VFS are equally effective for the treatment of GSV reflux, despite the lower volume of foam used for VFS alone.     

Outcomes and Side effects of Duplex-Guided Sclerotherapy in the Treatment of Great Saphenous Veins with 1% versus 3% Polidocanol Foam: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial with 1-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND: Eighty subjects were treated with either 1 or 3% polidocanol foam to compare the efficacy and adverse sequelae of each concentration of polidocanol foam. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the effects of two different concentrations of polidocanol foam. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During a 6-month period, we treated 80 consecutive patients with primary incompetent great saphenous veins in combination with saphenofemoral junction incompetence. These patients were treated with foam of either 1 or 3% polidocanol. Duplex analyses were made before treatment and in follow-up visits to determine the presence or absence of reflux. RESULTS: After 1 year, there was a clinically relevant difference in percentage of patients with occlusion of the treated great saphenous vein between both groups: 69.5% in the 1% foam group versus 80.1% in the 3% foam group; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=.249). After 1 year of follow-up, patients in the 3% polidocanol group noticed a larger cosmetic improvement than patients in the 1% group. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of primary incompetent greater saphenous veins, 3% polidocanol foam seems to be more effective than 1% polidocanol foam. The side effects were approximately similar in both groups.     

Patterns of Saphenous Venous Reflux in Women Presenting with Lower Extremity Telangiectasias

BACKGROUND: Telangiectasias have been treated with sclerotherapy without concomitant assessment or treatment of saphenous veins. OBJECTIVE: To clarify if ultrasound (US) mapping of saphenous veins is justifiable, this investigation determined prevalence of specific patterns of saphenous vein reflux in women with telangiectasias. METHODS: US mapping of the great and small saphenous veins (GSV, SSV) was performed in 1,740 extremities of 910 consecutive patients, mostly women (86%). A subgroup of 269 limbs of women with telangiectasias (CEAP C1 class) was included in this study. Patterns of GSV and SSV reflux were classified as perijunctional, proximal, distal, segmental, multisegmental, and diffuse. RESULTS: Reflux was detected in 125 extremities (46%): 5% had reflux in both the GSV and the SSV, 39% had GSV reflux, and 2% had SSV reflux. The most common pattern of GSV reflux was segmental (73%, 87/119). Prevalence of reflux was significantly greater in GSV versus SSV (p < .001). GSV segmental plus distal reflux (40%, 108/269) was significantly more prevalent than saphenofemoral junction or near junction reflux (4%, 11/269; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: US mapping of the GSV in women with telangiectasias is justifiable, even in asymptomatic extremities. Further research will determine if segmental reflux should be treated to avoid evolution to severe valvular insufficiency.     

Perforans Varicosis: Treatment of the Incompetent Perforating Vein Is Important

BACKGROUND: Varicose veins that arise from incompetent perforating veins are called perforans-varicosis. OBJECTIVE: This case report illustrates the relationship between incompetent perforating veins and varicosis. METHODS: An incompetent perforating vein, proximal of a varicose vein located at the dorsal side of the thigh, was treated by means of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy with 1% polidocanol foam. The varicose vein was not treated. RESULTS: After 1 week, the varicose vein and the incompetent perforating vein showed no reflux. The varicose vein was practically invisible. The residual vein was treated with sclerotherapy. After 6 weeks the varicose vein was still invisible. CONCLUSION: This proximal incompetent perforating vein was important for the development and maintenance of the varicose vein. Treatment of this incompetent perforating vein resulted in complete disappearance of the reflux in the varicose vein. In this case ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy was successful in treating the incompetent perforating vein. More studies are needed to investigate the long-term effect of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy as treatment of perforans-varicosis.     

Varicose vein surgery with preservation of the saphenous vein: A comparison between high ligation-avulsion versus saphenofemoral banding valvuloplasty-avulsion

Purpose: Surgical treatment of varicose veins with preservation of the greater saphenous vein (GSV) was studied.Methods: Patients with reflux at the saphenofemoral junction and grossly normal GSV were treated with two different surgical techniques: perivalvular banding valvuloplasty (PVBV-A) of the saphenous valve, wherein the diameter of the uppermost saphenous valve was narrowed by Dacron-reinforced silicone band (12 patients, 15 extremities); and high ligation (HL-A) of the saphenous vein, wherein the GSV was ligated flush with the femoral vein (14 patients, 16 extremities). Both groups also had varicose tributaries of GSV avulsed through multiple stab incisions.Results: In the HL-A group two GSV (13%) remained completely patent, 10 GSV (62.5%) thrombosed partially, and the remaining four GSV (25%) had complete thrombosis. In the PVBV-A group 12 GSV (80%) remained completely patent and without reflux, one GSV (7%) remained patent but showing reflux. Two GSV (13%) thrombosed completely. There were no surgical complications or recurrences (mean follow-up was 9.4 months for PVBV-A and 9.5 months for HL-A), and the postoperative recovery time was similar for both groups.Conclusions: Both techniques are equally effective in the early elimination of varicosities. Preservation of the saphenous vein is significantly better after PVBV-A (p < 0.01). A prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up is required. (J VASC SURG 1994;20:684-7.)     

Foam sclerotherapy combined with surgical treatment for recurrent varicose veins: short term results.

OBJECTIVE: To study the short term results of combined peroperative foam sclerotherapy (PFS) and surgical treatment for recurrent varicose veins. METHODS: PFS was used to treat 129 limbs with recurrent varices: 100 great saphenous (GSV), 29 small saphenous veins (SSV). Foam was prepared with 1% polidocanol mixed with 4 times its volume of air. The 100 GSVs comprised 28 trunks directly connected with the femoral vein, 28 connected to a lymph node venous network, 11 associated with perforators and 33 isolated trunks. The 29 SSVs comprised 4 trunks directly connected to the popliteal vein, 7 isolated trunks, 15 popliteal perforators and 3 recanalisations after SSV stripping. All operations included phlebectomies. In twenty limbs re-ligation of the SFJ and 4 SPJs was carried out. All were performed under local anaesthesia in an ambulatory setting. Patients were assessed clinically and by colour duplex ultrasound after 3 and 40 days follow-up. RESULTS: 120 patients (93%) showed complete obliteration of saphenous trunks, junctions and varices. The 9 incomplete obliterations were 3 venous recanalisations in the SSV compartment and 6 perforators (4 popliteal and 2 femoral). Two asymptomatic deep venous thromboses were detected by colour duplex 3 days after operation. CONCLUSION: PFS facilitates surgical treatment of recurrent varicose veins. There is a small risk of post-operative deep vein thrombosis.     

Saphenous ablation: sclerosant or sclerofoam?

During the last half of the 20th century, sclerotherapy as a major treatment of varicose veins came and went. At first, it was widely heralded as a substitute for surgery but after a prospective randomized study by Hobbs, interest in sclerotherapy waned. Just before the turn of the 21st century, Cabrera published his experience with foamed sclerosant in patients with great saphenous varices and arteriovenous malformations. Cabrera designed his treatment with the specific aim of obliterating the saphenous trunks. His technique consisted of filling the great saphenous vein in the thigh or the small saphenous vein in the calf with foamed sclerosant injected under ultrasound control. His initial report on long-term follow-up revealed that the results were at least comparable to surgery and perhaps somewhat better and his results have been confirmed by others. Investigations into treatment of small vein varices, including telangiectasias, has resulted in the finding that foam results in a 20% improved appearance compared to liquid sclerosant. The most popular sclerosants currently used as foams are polidocanol and sodium tetradecyl sulfate and of the many techniques used in making foams, the technique of Tessari has proven most popular. No randomized clinical trial comparing this technique to surgery has been published; however, the clinical series reports indicate that 80% to 90% of saphenous trunks remain occluded after 3 years when treated by foam sclerotherapy. Complications are seldom encountered but significant skin darkening and superficial thrombophlebitis are common. Temporary vision changes have occurred after foam and liquid sclerotherapy, with foam, these are always transient. Although the long-term efficacy of foamed sclerotherapy treatment is unlikely to be established for years, a number of phlebologists have taken up the practice because it has the advantage of not requiring general or regional anesthesia and takes much less time than equivalent surgical techniques.     

Venous reflux and venous distensibility in varicose and healthy veins.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse venous diameter changes and venous reflux parameters, assessed during a standardised Valsalva manoeuvre in healthy subjects and in patients with varicose veins. METHODS: Measurements were carried out in 444 vein segments, (96 legs of 48 healthy volunteers, 52 legs of 35 patients with varicose veins). The common femoral vein (CVF), the femoral vein (FV) and the great saphenous vein (GSV) were investigated. The parameters of reflux and the relative venous diameter change (VD diff %) were measured simultaneously during a standardised Valsalva manoeuvre. RESULTS: Venous diameter changes during Valsalva manoeuvre (VD diff) were significantly greater in the GSV and in the deep veins of varicose patients compared to healthy subjects. The median (Interquartile range) of VD max in the CFV was: 13.1 (3.5) mm and 11.2 (3.4) mm (p=0.0002, Mann-Whitney - U test), in the FV 7.8 (2.7) mm and 6.9 (2.0) mm (p=0.01, Mann-Whitney), in the GSV: 7.3 (3.7) mm and 4.2 (1.1) mm (p<0.0001, Mann-Whitney) for the varicose and healthy veins respectively. Good correlation was seen for the retrograde peak reflux velocity (PRV) and VD diff % in varicose veins (r=0.71 (0.57 - 0.81) p<0.0001, Mann-Whitney). CONCLUSION: Relative venous diameter--changes during a standardised Valsalva manoeuvre are significantly larger in the deep and superficial veins of varicose vein patients compared with healthy veins, the increased distensibility correlates with venous reflux parameters in varicose vein patients.     

腔内激光与腔内激光联合泡沫硬化剂治疗下肢静脉曲张的比较研究

目的探讨腔内激光联合泡沫硬化剂治疗下肢静脉曲张的疗效和安全性。方法 2010年7月～2011年10月将120例下肢静脉曲张按就诊顺序编号,每10例为一分配单元,1～10号为单纯激光组,11～20号为联合治疗组,以此类推,每组60例。单纯激光组:大隐静脉高位结扎后,用980 nm波长半导体激光腔内治疗大隐静脉主干、大隐静脉属支及曲张的静脉团;联合治疗组:大隐静脉高位结扎后,用980 nm波长半导体激光腔内激光治疗大隐静脉主干,泡沫硬化剂5 ml(1 ml聚桂醇注射液及4 ml空气经三通器混合制成5 ml泡沫硬化剂,现用现配)静脉注射治疗属支静脉及静脉团。结果所有患者随访6～12个月,平均9个月。单纯激光组痊愈56例,显效4例,总有效率100%;联合治疗组痊愈58例,显效2例,总有效率100%,2组疗效比较差异无显著性(Z=-0.834,P=0.404)。2组术后复发率无统计学差异[6.7%(4/60)vs.3.3%(2/60),χ2=0.175,P=0.675]。腔内激光组并发症发生率为35.0%(21/60),联合治疗组并发症发生率为3.3%(2/60),2组比较差异有显著性(χ2=19.417,P=0.000)。结论与单纯腔内激光治疗比较,腔内激光联合泡沫硬化剂治疗下肢静脉曲张并发症少,疗效无差别。     

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the early efficacy and complications of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) in a cohort of patients with varicose veins. METHODS: Of 192 consecutive patients referred with varicose veins over 15 months, only 11 chose surgery; the rest underwent UGFS treatment. Polidocanol was foamed 1 : 3 with air. Under ultrasound control via butterfly or Seldinger cannulation, 1 per cent foam was injected into superficial veins and 3 per cent foam into saphenous trunks, up to a total volume of 14 ml. Outcome was defined as complete when occlusion of the saphenous trunk and/or over 85 per cent of the varicosities was achieved, and partial closure when less. RESULTS: In 163 legs, complete occlusion occurred after one intervention, a further 32 after a second, and one after a third (overall 91 per cent). Of the remainder, all other legs achieved partial occlusion after up to three interventions, apart from two legs with great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence, which failed. All 23 legs with small saphenous veins had complete occlusion after one intervention compared with 64 of 97 legs with GSV incompetence (P < 0.010). Occlusion rates were also higher when the GSV was cannulated directly: 56 of 70 versus 8 of 27 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: UGFS achieved early complete occlusion safely in over 90 per cent of legs with varicose veins.     

Patterns of saphenous reflux in women with primary varicose veins

OBJECTIVE: Varicose veins have been linked to great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux and in particular, with reflux at the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ). Early stages of disease, however, may be associated with limited, localized reflux in segments of the GSV and/or small saphenous vein (SSV). Ultrasound mapping of saphenous veins was performed to determine patterns of GSV and SSV reflux in women with simple, primary varicose veins. METHODS: Ultrasound mapping was performed prospectively in 590 extremities of 326 women with varicose veins (CEAP C 2 class) but without edema, skin changes, or ulcers (C 3 to C 6 ). Average age was 42 +/- 13 (SD) years (range, 8 to 87). Patterns of GSV and SSV reflux, obtained in the upright position, were classified as I: perijunctional, originating from the SFJ or saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ) tributaries into the GSV or SSV; II: proximal, from the SFJ or SPJ to a tributary or perforating vein above the level of the malleoli; III: distal, from a tributary or perforating vein to the paramalleolar GSV or SSV; IV: segmental, from a tributary or perforating vein to another tributary or perforating vein above the malleoli; V; multisegmental, if two or more distinct refluxing segments were detected; and VI: diffused, involving the entire GSV or SSV from the SFJ or SPJ to the malleoli. RESULTS: Reflux was detected in 472 extremities (80%): 100 (17%) had reflux in both the GSV and SSV, 353 (60%) had GSV reflux only, and 19 (3%) had SSV reflux only, for a total prevalence of 77% at the GSV and 20% at the SSV. The most common pattern of GSV reflux was segmental (types IV and V) in 342 (58%) of 590; either one segment in 213 (36%) or more than one segment with competent SFJ in 99 (17%), or incompetent SFJ in 30 (5%), followed by distal GSV reflux (type III) in 65 (11%), proximal GSV reflux (type II) in 32 (5%), diffused throughout the entire GSV (type VI) in 10 (2%), and perijunctional (type I) in 4 (<1%). GSV refluxing segments were noted in the SFJ in 72 (12%) and in the thigh in 220 (37%), and leg (or both) in 345 (58%). CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of reflux justifies ultrasound mapping of the saphenous veins in women with primary varicose veins. Correction of SFJ reflux, however, may be needed in 相似文献   

大隐静脉传统剥脱术与泡沫硬化剂注射术的随机对照研究

目的 比较大隐静脉传统剥脱术与泡沫硬化剂注射联合高位结扎术治疗大隐静脉曲张的临床效果.方法 本研究为单中心前瞻性随机对照研究.2009年3月至11月,连续录入60例大隐静脉曲张患者,其中男性26例,女性34例,年龄37～66岁,中位年龄49岁.随机分为两组,每组30例,一组行大隐静脉剥脱术(手术组),另一组行高位结扎联合泡沫硬化剂注射治疗(硬化剂组).主要临床观察指标为患者术后恢复时间、术后疼痛程度和术后复发率,次要观察指标为围手术期并发症发生率.结果 1例患者术前退出研究,余59例手术按计划完成.硬化剂组手术时间短于手术组(43 min比65 min,P＜0.01),术后镇痛药应用少于手术组,术后平均恢复时间也少于手术组(3 d比6 d,P＜0.01).术后3个月随访,两组CEAP分级为C1,均较术前的C4明显改善(P＜0.01).术后6个月随访,硬化剂组大隐静脉闭塞率80.0%,手术组为89.5%,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 与大隐静脉剥脱术相比,大隐静脉高位结扎联合泡沫硬化剂注射术可以缩短手术时间,减少术后疼痛和术后恢复时间.     

Prevalence of varicose veins and venous anatomy in patients without truncal saphenous reflux.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and distribution of primary venous reflux in the lower limbs in patients without truncal saphenous reflux. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand and seven hundred and twelve patients with suspected venous disease were examined by duplex ultrasonography. Seven hundred and thirty-five patients had primary varicose veins with competent saphenous trunks. Limbs with truncal saphenous reflux, deep vein reflux or obstruction, previous injection sclerotherapy or vein surgery, arterial disease and inflammation of non-venous origin were excluded from further consideration. The CEAP classification system was used for clinical staging. Systematic duplex ultrasound examination was undertaken to assess the distribution of incompetent saphenous tributaries. RESULTS: The prevalence of primary reflux with competent saphenous trunks was 43%. Reflux of GSV calf tributaries was the most common. The majority of the limbs (96%) belonged to chronic venous disease classes C1 and C2 of the CEAP classification. CONCLUSIONS: Superficial venous reflux causing varicose veins in the presence competent saphenous trunks is very prevalent in this series in contrast to other studies, presumably reflecting differing patient populations. Our data clearly show that varicose veins may occur in any vein and do not depend on truncal saphenous incompetence. Careful duplex ultrasound evaluation allows the pattern of venous reflux to be established in this group of patient ensuring appropriate management of varices.     

Durability of reflux-elimination by a minimal invasive CHIVA procedure on patients with varicose veins. A 3-year prospective case study.

OBJECTIVES: to assess the outcome of a conservative and haemodynamic method for insufficient veins on an ambulatory basis (French acronym, "CHIVA") with preservation of the greater saphenous vein (GSV) for treatment of primary varicose veins. METHODS: duplex incompetence of the sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ) and the GSV trunk, with the re-entry perforating point located on a GSV tributary was demonstrated in 58 patients with varices (58 limbs). The re-entry point was defined as the perforator, whose compression of the superficial vein above its opening eliminates reflux in the GSV. Duplex scanning was performed preoperatively and at 7 days, and patients were followed prospectively at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after CHIVA. Operation consisted in flush ligation and division from the GSV of the tributary containing the re-entry perforating vein (no additional high ligation is included). If reflux returned, SFJ interruption was performed in a second surgical procedure. RESULTS: the GSV diameter showed an average reduction from 6.6 to 3.9 mm 36 months after surgery. Reflux in the GSV system was demonstrated in all but five (8%) patients. Of the 53 patients with recurrent reflux, 46 underwent SFJ interruption. CONCLUSIONS: elimination of reflux in the GSV after the interruption of insufficient collaterals is only temporary.     

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy combined with sapheno-femoral ligation compared to surgical treatment of varicose veins: early results of a randomised controlled trial.

AIM: This study is a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sapheno-femoral ligation, great saphenous stripping and multiple avulsions with sapheno-femoral ligation and ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy to the saphenous vein. Primary end points were patient recovery period and quality of life and secondary end points frequency of complications on the two arms of the trial and the cost of the treatment. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Sixty patients with primary varicose veins due to GSV incompetence and suitable for day case surgery were randomly allocated to undergo ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy with sapheno-femoral ligation under local anaesthesia (n=30) or sapheno-femoral ligation, stripping and multiple avulsions under general anaesthesia (n=30). The study protocol included history, physical examination, assignment of CEAP class and assessment venous clinical severity score (VCSS), completion of the aberdeen vein questionnaire (AVQ) and colour duplex ultrasound. RESULTS: All treatments were completed as intended. Median time to return to normal activities was significantly reduced in the foam sclerotherapy group (2 days) compared to the surgical group (8 days) (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney). AVQ score was also significantly reduced at 3 months by 46% in the sclerotherapy group, and by 40% in the conventional surgery group (p<0.001, Wilcoxon). The time taken to complete treatment was shorter in the foam sclerotherapy plus SFJ ligation group: 45 vs. 85 min (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney). The overall cost of the procedure in the sclerotherapy group ( 672.97 pounds) was significantly less compared to conventional surgery ( 1120.64 pounds). At 3 weeks, there was no statistical difference in the complication rate between the two groups. At 3 months, median CEAP class dropped from four pre-operatively to one following treatment in both groups and the median VCSS score dropped from five to one in group one and from seven to three in group two (p<0.001, Wilcoxon test). In group one four patients (13%) had a recanalised vein which needed further sessions of foam sclerotherapy, resulting in a short-term closure rate of 87%. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound guided sclerotherapy combined with sapheno-femoral ligation was less expensive, involved a shorter treatment time and resulted in more rapid recovery compared to sapheno-femoral ligation, saphenous stripping and phlebectomies.