Impact of gender on statin efficacy

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the impact of statin therapy on the combined endpoint of cardiovascular events in women and men separately.

Research design and methods: A systematic literature search through May 2006 was conducted to identify randomized, controlled statin trials evaluating the gender specific incidence of cardiovascular events. Weighted averages were reported as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated via random-effects model.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measured was a composite endpoint of all cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes measured included death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke.

Results: Fifteen trials were included in this meta-analysis. Cardiovascular events were reduced in men (RR 0.76 [95% CI 0.70, 0.81]) and women (RR 0.79 [95% CI 0.69, 0.90]). Reductions in mortality, MI, and stroke predominantly contributed to the reduction in cardiovascular events in men taking statins. Women did not have a reduction in mortality or stroke, suggesting that the reductions in cardiac events may have been predominantly due to reductions in need for revascularization and/or unstable angina.

Conclusions: Statins reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in men and women, but women on statins may not have reductions in mortality and stroke like their male counterparts.     

Drug delivery techniques for treating age-related macular degeneration

Introduction: Currently, the standard therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration involves the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs, which are delivered by repeated office-based intravitreal injections. This treatment is generally very effective in stabilizing or improving vision, although repeated injections create a burden for patients, family members and physicians. In addition, the cumulative risks of endophthalmitis and other complications increase with the number of injections.

Areas covered: In the clinic, much attention is focused on the relative efficacies of the three major anti-VEGF medications (bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept) as well as the most popular re-injection regimens (monthly, as-needed and treat-and-extend). In theory, intravitreal anti-VEGF drug delivery with sustained-release devices would offer similar visual results with fewer required re-injections. Various approaches have been studied, including noninvasive techniques, intraocular implants and colloidal carriers, such as liposomes, microparticles and nanoparticles.

Expert opinion: Despite its theoretical appeal, sustained-release drug delivery will not replace current techniques unless it offers one or more advantages in efficacy, safety, convenience or cost. Currently, many patients maintain stable vision with intravitreal injections at intervals of 2 months or longer, so sustained-release techniques will have to lengthen these intervals substantially to become widely accepted. As we continue to collect data from clinical trials, the role of sustained-release techniques will become better defined.     

Accumulated safety data of micafungin in therapy and prophylaxis in fungal diseases

Objective: To define better the safety profile of micafungin, an analysis of micafungin clinical trial safety data was undertaken.

Research design and methods: Adverse event data were pooled worldwide from 17 clinical efficacy and safety studies. Adverse events were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 5.0.

Results: In the pooled clinical trial data set, 3028 patients received at least one dose of micafungin. The mean age of patients was 41.4 years; with 296 (9.8%) children (< 16 years) and 387 (12.8%) elderly patients (≥ 65 years). Common underlying conditions were hematopoietic stem cell and other transplantations (26.1%), malignancies (20.8%) and HIV (32.9%). Mean exposure was 18 days for adults and 29 days for children. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were nausea (2.8%), vomiting (2.5%), phlebitis (2.5%), hypokalemia (2.1%), fever/pyrexia (2.1%) and diarrhea (2%), as well as increases in alkaline phosphatase (2.7%), aspartate aminotransferase (2.3%) and alanine aminotransferase (2%). Although elderly adults had a higher incidence of renal impairment (1%) compared with non-elderly adult (0.1%) and pediatric patients (0.3%), there were no clear trends showing an association between higher doses of micafungin or longer treatment durations and increased incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events.

Conclusions: Analysis of a large database demonstrated a favorable clinical safety profile for micafungin similar to other echinocandins.     

A safety evaluation of ranibizumab in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration

Introduction: The use of intravitreal ranibizumab has transformed the outcomes for thousands of patients with wet age related macular degeneration (AMD), which is the leading cause of blindness in developed countries. Prior to its introduction, most patients with wet AMD would rapidly lose central vision. The use of intravitreal ranibizumab has been shown to reduce certifiable visual loss by about a half. Current treatment regimens with ranibizumab in wet AMD require multiple injections over several years and so it is highly relevant to review the safety record of this important drug.

Areas covered: This review considers the important ocular and systemic adverse events (AE) that have been reported in the literature, particularly in the context of the pivotal clinical trials that have been performed. It also reviews the safety of other anti-VEGF drugs that are used in wet AMD, namely bevacizumab and aflibercept, and compares these drugs with ranibizumab.

Expert opinion: Overall, intravitreal ranibizumab can be considered a safe and highly effective drug for patients with wet AMD. However recent concerns about retinal thinning following ranibizumab therapy, possible systemic AE associated with all anti-VEGF drugs and the occurrence of complications relating to drug preparation and delivery must be considered.     

Impact of renal function on ischemic stroke and major bleeding rates in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with warfarin or rivaroxaban: a retrospective cohort study using real-world evidence

Objectives: Renal dysfunction is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and is an independent predictor of stroke and systemic embolism. Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with renal dysfunction may face a particularly high risk of thromboembolism and bleeding. The current retrospective cohort study was designed to assess the impact of renal function on ischemic stroke and major bleeding rates in NVAF patients in the real-world setting (outside a clinical trial).

Methods: Medical claims and Electronic Health Records were retrieved retrospectively from Optum’s Integrated Claims–Clinical de-identified dataset from May 2011 to August 2014. Patients with NVAF treated with warfarin (2468) or rivaroxaban (1290) were selected. Each treatment cohort was stratified by baseline estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) levels. Confounding adjustments were made using inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTWs). Incidence rates and hazard ratios of ischemic stroke and major bleeding events were calculated for both cohorts.

Results: Overall, patients treated with rivaroxaban had an ischemic stroke incidence rate of 1.9 per 100 person-years (PY) while patients treated with warfarin had a rate of 4.2 per 100 PY (HR?=?0.41 [0.21–0.80], p?=?.009). Rivaroxaban patients with an eCrCl below 50?mL/min (N?=?229) had an ischemic stroke rate of 0.8 per 100 PY, while the rate for the warfarin cohort (N?=?647) was 6.0 per 100 PY (HR?=?0.09 [0.01–0.72], p?=?.02). For the other renal function levels (i.e. eCrCl 50–80 and ≥80?mL/min) HRs indicated no statistically significant differences in ischemic stroke risks. Bleeding events did not differ significantly between cohorts stratified by renal function.

Conclusions: Ischemic stroke rates were significantly lower in the overall NVAF population for rivaroxaban vs. warfarin users, including patients with eCrCl below 50?mL/min. For all renal function groups, major bleeding risks were not statistically different between treatment groups.     

Safety profile of HTX-019 administered as an intravenous push in cancer patients: a retrospective review

ABSTRACT

Objectives: HTX-019 (Cinvanti®) is a novel injectable emulsion formulation of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist (RA) aprepitant, approved (as 30-min infusion and 2-min injection) for preventing acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This retrospective analysis evaluated the safety of HTX-019 administered by 2-min injection in patients with cancer.

Methods: At a single center, HTX-019 was evaluated as a 2-min injection within a guideline-recommended three-drug regimen for CINV prophylaxis in patients receiving highly (HEC) or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed 0-60 minutes following initiation of HTX-019 administration, focusing on infusion-site adverse events and hypersensitivity reactions.

Results: Among 600 patients (78 MEC, 522 HEC), the most common diagnoses were lung (172) and breast (129) cancer. Patients received a 2-min injection of HTX-019, followed by a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 RA intravenously (IV) (palonosetron or ondansetron), dexamethasone IV, and chemotherapy regimen (most common was cisplatin-containing) via a central (76%) and peripheral line (24%). No TEAEs occurred within 60 min after start of HTX-019 administration.

Conclusion: HTX-019 administered by 2-min injection has a tolerable safety profile in patients with cancer, representing a viable method of HTX-019 administration for CINV prevention.     

The efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants for the preventive treatment in atrial fibrillation patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Novel oral anticoagulants, including direct factor Xa inhibitors and direct factor IIa inhibitors, have been used to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) for a decade. In this study, the efficacy and safety of the novel oral anticoagulants were assessed in AF patients.

Methods: No language restrictions were applied. Study selection and data extraction were carried out by searching PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, the BIOSIS, the Web of Science, Clinical Trials Registers, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the China Academic Library and Information System. Each database was searched from its inception date to June 2013. Using odds ratio (OR) as an indicator, we systematically evaluated the primary efficacy endpoints and safety endpoints, as well as 10 secondary endpoints.

Result: Compared to the control drugs, the novel oral anticoagulants showed an OR decreased by 26% (OR: 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62–0.88) for stroke or systemic embolism, decreased by 24% (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64–0.90) for major bleeding, decreased by 10% (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.95) for death from any cause, decreased by 27% for disabling or fatal stroke (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54–0.97), decreased by 31% (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60–0.8) for fatal bleeding, and decreased by 8% (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88–0.95) for serious adverse events. However, there was no significant difference in acute myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major, all bleeding events, all adverse events and liver function disorder, between the novel oral anticoagulants and control drugs (p?>?0.05).

Conclusions: Compared to the control drugs, the novel oral anticoagulants showed higher efficiency and safety in patients with AF, as evidenced by their superior performance not only in reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism with a lower risk of major bleeding but also in decreasing the incidence of death from any cause, disabling or fatal stroke, serious adverse events and fatal bleeding.     

Efficacy and safety analysis of new P2Y12 inhibitors versus clopidogrel in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis

Objective:

New P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, classified as oral (prasugrel and ticagrelor) and intravenous (cangrelor and elinogrel) drugs, have shown improved antithrombotic effects compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in landmark trials. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared new P2Y₁₂ inhibitors with clopidogrel to determine their efficacy and safety in patients undergoing PCI.

Methods:

Randomized controlled trials of at least 4 weeks, comparing new P2Y₁₂ inhibitors with clopidogrel in PCI, were identified using the electronic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from January 1, 1980, to July 31, 2014.

Main outcome measures:

The primary efficacy endpoints were all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). The primary safety endpoint was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding.

Results:

Twelve studies including 71,097 patients met the inclusion criteria. New P2Y₁₂ inhibitors significantly reduced all-cause death (odds ratio [OR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73–0.90, p?p?p?p?=?0.03) and cardiovascular death (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73–0.92, p?=?0.001) compared with clopidogrel. There were no significant differences between stroke (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.72–1.05, p?=?0.14) and major bleeding events (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.99–1.52, p?=?0.06) between the new P2Y₁₂ inhibitor and clopidogrel groups.

Conclusion:

New P2Y₁₂ inhibitors decreased death in patients undergoing PCI compared with clopidogrel with a considerable safety and tolerability profile; however, the risk/benefit ratio of ischemic and bleeding events should be further investigated.     

Antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events: a review of the clinical trial data and guidelines

ABSTRACT

Background: One strategy of reducing the burden of stroke is the prevention of recurrent stroke, following an initial ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) of arterial origin, by means of antiplatelet therapy.

Scope: This review article surveys and discusses the current clinical trial data and guidelines for the use of antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent stroke/TIA of arterial origin (not stroke due to atrial fibrillation). Based on the latest available evidence, a new antiplatelet treatment algorithm for the long-term treatment of patients following atherothromboembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA is proposed.

Findings: Meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials in patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of arterial origin indicate that, compared with control, the relative risk reduction (RRR) for recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events is 13% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6% to 19%) with aspirin, 13% (4% to 21%; p = 0.046) with dipyridamole and 34% (24% to 43%) with the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole. Compared with aspirin, the relative risk of recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events is reduced by 7.3% (95% CI –5.7% to 18.7%) with clopidogrel and 18% (9% to 26%; p = 0.0003) with the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel is not significantly more effective in preventing serious vascular events than clopidogrel alone (RRR 6.4%; –4.6% to 16.3%) in the long-term treatment of patients with previous ischaemic stroke and TIA, mainly because of a cumulative excess of bleeding complications. The relative risks and benefits of long-term treatment with clopidogrel and the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole are being compared in an ongoing large clinical trial (PRoFESS). Current Australian therapeutic guidelines for antiplatelet therapy among patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of arterial origin have incorporated important new findings from recently published clinical trials and recommend aspirin or the combination of dipyridamole plus aspirin as the preferred long-term antiplatelet therapy.

Conclusion: Whilst awaiting the results of the PRoFESS trial, the combination of dipyridamole plus aspirin is the preferred antiplatelet regimen to reduce the risk of recurrent vascular events among patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of arterial origin.     

Results of intravitreal ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity in infants

Purpose: To assess the results of intravitreal ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in infants.

Methods: A single-institution, retrospective consecutive case series.

Results: Thirty-one patients who received ranibizumab treatment for ROP were evaluated in this study. The mean follow-up time was 14?±?1.37?months. Vascularization of the peripheral retina had completed with delay in the majority of cases and also avascular areas were present in the peripheral retinas of five infants at one year of age. Although recurrence of ROP developed in 14 infants after single-dose ranibizumab treatment, only four infants received additional treatment due to recurrence of ROP requiring treatment. No serious ocular complications were reported, but, two infants died in this series.

Conclusion: Even so ranibizumab treatment is an effective therapy for ROP in early period, close monitoring after injection is necessary due to the high incidence of recurrence. In addition, questions remain regarding the systemic safety of ranibizumab. Further studies are needed to study the systemic and ocular side effects of ranibizumab.     

Comparing bimatoprost and travoprost in black Americans

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the intraocular pressurelowering efficacy and safety of topical bimatoprost 0.03% with that of travoprost 0.004% for the reatment of black patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT).

Research design and methods: Multicenter, prospective, randomized, investigator-masked trial of 94 black patients previously diagnosed with OAG or OHT. All patients completed washout of ocular hypotensive medications before study participation. Patients were assigned to either once-daily bimatoprost 0.03% or once-daily travoprost 0.004% for 3 months.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measures were mean intraocular pressure (IOP), mean change from baseline IOP, and percentage of patients who reached a target IOP reduction. Secondary measures included ophthalmologic examination and adverse events.

Results: Both bimatoprost and travoprost significantly lowered IOP at all study visits (?p < 0.001). Bimatoprost provided mean IOP reductions from baseline that ranged from 6.8?mmHg to 7.8?mmHg (27% to 31%). Travoprost provided mean IOP reductions from baseline that ranged from 6.2?mmHg to 6.9?mmHg (25% to 28%). By month 3, 85% of participants in the bimatoprost group had a mean IOP reduction of at least 20%, compared with 68% of those in the travoprost group. Furthermore, 31.9% of those in the bimatoprost group had a mean IOP reduction of more than 40% at month 3 compared with 20.9% of those in the travoprost group. There were no significant differences in biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, or visual acuity. Ocular redness was the most commonly reported adverse event in both treatment groups. No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Bimatoprost and travoprost each effectively lowered IOP in this population of black patients. More patients achieved clinically relevant IOP reductions with bimatoprost.     

Adverse clinical events in Japanese atrial fibrillation patients with and without coronary artery disease—findings from the SAKURA AF Registry

Abstract

Background: Although atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are increasing in prevalence in Japan, real-world data regarding clinical outcomes in Japanese AF patients with CAD are limited.

Methods: The SAKURA AF Registry is a prospective multi-center registry created to investigate outcomes of oral anticoagulant (OAC) use in Japanese AF patients. A study was conducted involving 3237 enrollees from 63 Tokyo-area institutions who were followed up for a median of 39.3?months. Clinical adverse events were compared between the patients accompanied with (n?=?312) and without CAD (n?=?2925).

Results: The incidence of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality rates were significantly higher among patients with CAD than among those without CAD (5.98 vs 2.52 events per 100 patient-years, respectively, p?<?0.001; 3.27 vs 1.94 deaths per 100 patient-years, respectively, p?=?0.012), but there was no difference in strokes/transient ischemic attacks or systemic embolisms (1.70 vs 1.34). After a multivariate adjustment, CAD remained a risk factor for cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR]?=?1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?1.08–2.25, p?=?0.018). Among CAD patients, the propensity score-adjusted risk for major bleeding was significantly decreased among direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users in comparison to that among warfarin users (HR?=?0.29, 95% CI?=?0.07–0.94, p?=?0.04), but other adverse clinical events did not differ significantly between these two groups.

Conclusions: CAD did not appear to be a major determinant of strokes/TIAs, major bleeding, or all-cause mortality, but appeared to increase the risk of cardiovascular events in Japanese AF patients. The risk of major bleeding in CAD patients appeared to decrease when a DOAC rather than warfarin was administered. The data suggested that patients with AF and concomitant CAD require careful management and follow-up to reduce cardiovascular risks, and DOACs may be a better choice over warfarin when considering the risk of major bleeding.     

An early evaluation of bleeding-related hospital readmissions among hospitalized patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoagulants

Objective:

Clinical trials have demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are efficacious in reducing stroke risk among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) with differences in the reduction of bleeding risks vs. warfarin. The objective of this study was to assess bleeding-related hospital readmissions among hospitalized NVAF patients treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in the US.

Research design and methods:

Patients (≥18 years) with a discharge diagnosis of NVAF who received apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban during hospitalization were identified from the Premier Hospital database (1 January 2012–31 March 2014) and the Cerner Health Facts hospital database (1 January 2012–31 August 2014). Patients identified from each database were analyzed separately and grouped into three cohorts depending on which DOAC was received. Patient characteristics, hospital resource use and costs, and frequency of readmissions within 1 month were evaluated.

Results:

Among study populations identified from the Premier database (N?=?74,730) and the Cerner database (N?=?14,201), patients who received apixaban were older, had greater comorbidity, and had higher stroke and bleeding risks. After controlling for patient characteristics, including comorbidity and stroke and bleeding risks, compared with patients who received apixaban during their index hospitalizations, the odds of bleeding-related hospital readmissions were significantly greater by 1.4-fold (p?<?0.01) for patients who received rivaroxaban and 1.2-fold (p?=?0.16) numerically greater for patients who received dabigatran among patients identified from the Premier Hospital database. Among patients in the Cerner Health Facts hospital database, bleeding-related hospital readmissions were significantly greater by 1.6-fold (p?=?0.04) for patients who received rivaroxaban and 1.3-fold (p?=?0.30) numerically greater for patients who received dabigatran compared to patients who received apixaban.

Limitations:

No causal relationship between treatment and outcomes can be concluded.

Conclusions:

NVAF patients using different DOACs had different characteristics, including stroke and bleeding risks. Use of rivaroxaban, compared to apixaban was associated with significantly greater risk of bleeding-related readmissions across two database claims analyses.     

The effect and safety of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab and bevacizumab on the corneal endothelium in the treatment of diabetic macular edema

Objective: To investigate the effect and safety of intravitreal injection (IVI) of bevacizumab and ranibizumab on corneal endothelial cell count and morphology in patients with diabetic macular edema.

Materials and methods: A total of 60 eyes from 60 consecutive patients who received 0.5?mg/0.05?ml IVIs of bevacizumab (n?=?30, IVB group) or 1.25?mg/0.05?ml ranibizumab (n?=?30, IVR group) for three consecutive months were investigated prospectively. Specular microscopy was performed to evaluate endothelial cell count, the percentage of hexagonal cells (pleomorphism), and the coefficient of variation of the cell size (polymegathism); optical biometry was performed to evaluate central corneal thickness. Results before injection and 1 month after the first and third injections were compared.

Results: The groups were matched for age (p?=?0.11) and gender (p?=?0.32). There was no significant difference in endothelial cell count (IVB group, p?=?0.66; IVR group, p?=?0.74), pleomorphism (IVB group, p?=?0.44; IVR group, p?=?0.88) and polymegathism (IVB group, p?=?0.21; IVR group, p?=?0.24) before injection or 1 month after the first and third injections. There was also no difference in central corneal thickness (IVB group, p?=?0.15; IVR group, p?=?0.58) before injection or 1 month after the first and third injections.

Conclusion: Monthly 1.25?mg/0.05?ml IVIs of bevacizumab or 0.5?mg/0.05?ml of ranibizumab for three consecutive months in the treatment of diabetic macular edema does not affect corneal morphology and has no harmful effects on the endothelium.     

Long-term safety and effectiveness of biosimilar insulin glargine in Japanese patients with diabetes mellitus in routine clinical practice: results of a post-marketing safety study

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of biosimilar insulin glargine (GLY) in real-world clinical practice.

Methods: This prospective, non-interventional, multicenter, observational, post-marketing safety study (PMSS) enrolled Japanese patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM) starting GLY therapy, and was required by Japanese Pharmaceutical Affairs Law mandating post-marketing safety surveillance to acquire safety and effectiveness data of biosimilar products. Data collected from the 12-month observation included patient characteristics, adverse events, and blood glucose control.

Results: The study enrolled 141 patients with T1DM and 1104 patients with T2DM. Pre-study insulin was used by 94.1% of patients with T1DM and 75.0% with T2DM. 65.4% of patients with T1DM and 64.3% with T2DM switched from the reference product (GLY-switched), while 25.0% with T2DM were insulin-naive. Adverse events were reported by 5.7% and 8.5% in T1DM and T2DM, respectively. Similar incidences were reported in GLY-switched. Adverse events were reported by 10.7% in insulin-naive T2DM. Baseline mean hypoglycemic events/month were 1.8 and 0.1 in T1DM and T2DM, respectively: the mean change from baseline (CFB) was –1.2 (p?=?.066) and 0.0 (p?=?.915), respectively. Baseline mean HbA1c was 8.4% and 8.7% in T1DM and T2DM, respectively; the mean CFB was –0.5% (p?<?.001) and –0.9% (p?<?.001), respectively, and –1.5% (p?<?.001) in insulin-naive T2DM.

Conclusions: This first long-term Japanese PMSS of GLY demonstrated adverse events, hypoglycemia, and glycemic control consistent with the known GLY profile for T1DM and T2DM patients, in routine clinical practice.     

Dabigatran etexilate,a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor,for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation

Importance of the field: Warfarin is the only oral anticoagulant recommended for the prevention of ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation. A newer and safer anticoagulant is needed because of increased hemorrhagic risks with warfarin, difficult-to-maintain therapeutic levels, and higher drug to drug and food interactions.

Areas covered in this review: Dabigatran etexilate is a new, effective, reversible, rapid-acting, oral direct inhibitor of thrombin. This review focuses on the results of major Phase II and III trials conducted to evaluate the use of dabigatran in prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation.

What the reader will gain: The objective of this paper is to discuss the use of dabigatran for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and to review its major advantages and disadvantages over warfarin.

Take home message: After the recent publication of Phase III trial RE-LY (randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulation therapy), the use of dabigatran in atrial fibrillation is more clearly defined. A higher dose of dabigatran may be beneficial in patients who have recurrent ischemic events, despite therapeutic levels of warfarin. A lower dose is potentially safer than warfarin because of fewer hemorrhagic complications. Disadvantages include twice-daily dosing, dyspepsia and higher cost.     

Stroke risk reduction outweighed bleeding risk increase from vitamin K antagonist treatment among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with high stroke risk and low bleeding risk

Objective: Warfarin is widely used for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We compared the rates of stroke and major bleeding in NVAF patients with a high stroke risk and low bleeding risk profile during warfarin treated (W+) and warfarin untreated (W?) periods.

Method: Insurance claims from six commercial, Medicaid or Medicare databases were analyzed from 2000 to 2014. NVAF patients treated with warfarin, with a CHADS₂/CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2, and an ATRIA score ≤3 at baseline were identified. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of stroke and major bleeding were calculated for W?+?versus W? episodes of person-time, as well as for first 30 days versus beyond 30 days of W?+?episodes.

Results: Among 316,145 patients, anticoagulant prophylaxis with warfarin significantly reduced stroke risk, with IRRs ranging from 0.48 (95% CI: 0.46–0.51) to 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70–0.91), and increased major bleeding risk, with IRRs ranging from 1.13 (95% CI: 1.10–1.15) to 1.95 (95% CI: 1.10–3.45). Stroke and major bleeding rates were higher during the first 30 days of W?+?than beyond.

Conclusion: In NVAF patients at high risk for stroke and low risk for bleeding, our data confirm the effectiveness of anticoagulation for stroke prevention. The decrease in stroke risk of anticoagulation may outweigh the risk of major bleeding events, particularly among elderly patients. Potential risks of warfarin during initiation warrant attention, especially among patients who stop and start therapy repeatedly.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of dabigatran versus rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation using real-world evidence in elderly US Medicare beneficiaries

Objective: Dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been approved by the US FDA to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Newly published real-world evidence based on the US population found that elderly Medicare patients with NVAF treated with rivaroxaban experienced statistically significant increases in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and major extracranial bleeding, and statistically nonsignificant decreases in thromboembolic stroke and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared with dabigatran. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban for the treatment of US Medicare NVAF patients.

Methods: A previously published Markov model was adapted to compare dabigatran and rivaroxaban. The model considered thromboembolic stroke, bleeding events, and AMI based on the published real-world event risks. Model outputs included clinical event rates, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

Results: Dabigatran patients experienced fewer ICH and major extracranial bleeding events than rivaroxaban patients, but more stroke and AMI events. Dabigatran was found to yield lower costs and higher QALYs than rivaroxaban, with incremental costs of ?$3534 and incremental QALYs of 0.004. Results remained consistent in sensitivity analyses, with a positive net monetary benefit (willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY) for dabigatran over rivaroxaban for all model inputs tested.

Conclusions: In this study using US Medicare real-world data, dabigatran was found to dominate rivaroxaban. The analyses were limited by the short follow-up period of the real-world data and results may not be generalizable to other patient populations.