Predictors for successful sperm retrieval of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (TESE) following failed TESE in nonobstructive azoospermia patients

The purpose of this study was to observe the clinical utility and the possible determinants in predicting sperm retrieval of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) for nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients with failed conventional TESE at their first attempts. A total of 52 NOA males underwent salvage mTESE were recruited in this study. Related data, including age, BMI, the presence of Klinefelter's syndrome and varicocele, cryptorchidism, mean testicular volume, hormonal profile (total testosterone (TT), follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinising hormone (LH), inhibin B (INHB)), testicular histology and surgical duration, were collected and analysed. A multivariate logistic regression with likelihood ratio test revealed the following predictors of sperm retrieval: TT and testicular histology (chi‐square of likelihood ratio = 26.42, df = 4, p < .005). A formula was also established using multivariate regression analysis in predicting sperm retrieval probability. A predicted probability of more than 71% was determined of the formula as the cut‐off value in predicting sperm retrieval using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis with a sensitivity and specificity 78.0% and 72.4% respectively. In conclusion, salvage mTESE is of clinical value in NOA males with failed TESE attempts, whereas the established formula could be useful in determining the proper salvage mTESE candidates.     

In the era of micro‐dissection sperm retrieval (m‐TESE) is an isolated testicular biopsy necessary in the management of men with non‐obstructive azoospermia?

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? There are a number of ways to retrieve sperm from the testis however there is no universal consensus as to which is the best approach. Furthermore, there is controversy as to whether a diagnostic biopsy has a role in management of non‐obstructive azoospermia (NOA). This study gives support to the growing consensus that micro‐dissection TESE (m‐TESE) is the optimum approach to retrieve sperm in patients with NOA even when previous attempts have failed. Moreover, it strongly suggests that histology is unreliable in determining success rates with m‐TESE and therefore isolated diagnostic biopsies should not be performed.

OBJECTIVES

• ? To assess the outcome of sperm retrieval using micro‐dissection‐TESE (m‐TESE) and simultaneous diagnostic biopsy in NOA to determine if the final definitive histology correlated with the outcome of sperm retrieval by m‐TESE in men with NOA.
• ? To determine if there was a correlation between FSH levels and positive sperm retrieval rates and assessed the success rate of m‐TESE as either a primary or a salvage procedure after previous negative sperm retrieval.
• ? The EAU guidelines (2010) recommend that in men with non obstructive azoospermia ‘a testicular biopsy is the best procedure to define the histological diagnosis and the possibility of finding sperm’. However, these guidelines do not identify which patients should have a diagnostic biopsy and if this biopsy should be performed as an isolated procedure or synchronously with sperm retrieval. It is also suggested that there is a correlation between the histological diagnosis and possibility of finding sperm on testis biopsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? 100 men with NOA underwent a m‐TESE sperm retrieval between 2005 and 2010 at a single centre.
• ? All patients underwent hormonal analysis (serum FSH, Testosterone and LH levels) and genetic analyses after full counselling including; Y‐deletion, CF‐gene analysis and karyotype.
• ? Thirty five men had previously undergone unsuccessful TESA/TESE or diagnostic biopsy at other centres. All patients underwent synchronous sperm retrieval and biopsy of the testis, which was sent for histopathological examination on the day of an ICSI cycle or as an isolated procedure.

RESULTS

• ? Mean age of patients was 37.25 (range 29–56 years). The mean serum FSH levels in the Sertoli cell only, maturation arrest and hypospermatogenesis groups were 21.3 IU/L (2.8–75), 16.18 (1.6–67) and 14.17 IU/L (0.8–42.3) respectively. SR rates in the respective groups were 42.85%, 26.6% and 75.86% (P= 0.023). There were no post‐operative complications.
• ? In the 35 men who had previously undergone unsuccessful procedures elsewhere, the SR rates were 57.1%. The overall sperm retrieval rate was 50%. There was no correlation between SR and FSH levels (P= 0.28).

CONCLUSION

• ? M‐TESE should be considered the gold standard for retrieval of testicular sperm in NOA, even in cases where there has been previously unsuccessful attempts. FSH levels and histology cannot be used to predict the success of sperm retrieval. An isolated diagnostic testicular biopsy is not recommended in men with NOA, as a significant proportion of men undergoing m‐TESE will have successful a sperm retrieval irrespective of previous histology or previous unsuccessful surgery.

     

Are hormone measurements and ultrasounds really predictors of sperm retrieval in testicular sperm extraction? A case report and literature review

Azoospermia can be diagnosed in about 10%–15% of the infertile male population. To overcome the problem of failure to produce spermatozoa in the ejaculate in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), testicular sperm extraction (TESE) may be performed to find the focal area of spermatogenesis. A 47‐year‐old man with NOA presented for treatment of secondary couple infertility. The patient underwent a first TESE 7 years earlier with cryopreservation, and an intracytoplasmic sperm injection–embryo transfer ended in a term pregnancy. He reported a history of repeated testicular traumas. At the present time, a complete medical workup was carried out, including clinical history, general and genital physical examination, scrotal and transrectal ultrasounds. Hormone measurements showed follicle‐stimulating hormone level of 42.7 IU/L, luteinising hormone of 11.4 IU/L, total testosterone of 2.6 ng/ml and right and left testicular volume, respectively, of 4 and 3.9 ml. He underwent a second TESE, with successful sperm retrieval and cryopreservation. The histological pattern was hypospermatogenesis. In cases of extreme testicular impairment, although in the presence of very high follicle‐stimulating hormone value and small testicular volume, estimating poor sperm recovery potential, the integration of clinical and anamnestic data, could help the surgeon to practise the more appropriate method of treatment.     

Outcome of microsurgical testicular sperm extraction in familial idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia

The aim of the study was to evaluate the sperm retrieval rate by microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in familial idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). One hundred and nineteen patients with idiopathic NOA who underwent microsurgical TESE over the past 5 years were included. Patients were then divided into two groups; Group ‘A’ with familial idiopathic NOA (11 families with two brothers in each family, 22 patients) and Group ‘B’ with nonfamilial idiopathic NOA (97 patients). Clinical data as well as data of microsurgical TESE were recorded. In Group ‘A’, the sperm retrieval rate was 9.1% (2/22 patients) compared to 45.4% in Group ‘B’ (44/97 patients) (P ≤ 0.05). The two patients in Group ‘A’ with successful sperm retrieval belonged to one family. The histopathological diagnosis was the same in the brothers in each family. It can be concluded that the testicular sperm retrieval rate in familial idiopathic NOA is significantly lower than in nonfamilial idiopathic NOA.     

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection by testicular sperm in patients with aspermia or azoospermia after cancer treatment

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficiency of testicular biopsy and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients with aspermia or non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) after cancer treatment. From 1996 to 2003, 30 men with a history of cancer, affected by aspermia or NOA and without sperm cryopreserved before cytotoxic treatment underwent testicular sperm extraction (TESE). In these men, clinical, hormonal and histological characteristics were compared; 13 underwent 39 TESE-ICSI cycles using frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa (TESE-ICSI group). In the same period, 31 ICSI cycles were performed in 20 men with aspermia or NOA using ejaculated sperm frozen before cancer treatment (ejaculated sperm-ICSI group). Fertilization, blastocyst development, pregnancy and miscarriage rates were compared between the groups. Testicular volume, serum follicle-stimulating hormone level and Johnsen score indicated complete although reduced spermatogenesis in men with aspermia and abnormal spermatogenesis in men with NOA. After TESE, sperm retrieval was positive in 92% of men with aspermia and 58% of men with NOA. In TESE-ICSI patients with NOA a significantly lower proportion of embryos developed to the blastocyst stage than in patients with aspermia and in those after ICSI with frozen-thawed ejaculated sperm (23% vs. 43% and 47%, p = 0.03 and p < 0.01 respectively). In all groups the miscarriage rates were high; in patients with aspermia and NOA, characterized by increased age, the miscarriage rate tended to be higher in spite of similar female age and female indications of infertility. In patients affected by aspermia or NOA after cancer treatment and without sperm cryopreserved before treatment, TESE-ICSI using testicular sperm provide a chance to father a child.     

Can spermatozoa be retrieved in non‐obstructive azoospermic patients with high FSH level?: A retrospective cohort study

We aimed in this retrospective study to evaluate non‐surgical preoperative parameters and testicular histopathology in determining the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in non‐obstructive azoospermic (NOA) patients. We evaluated the data of 1,395 consecutive patients who underwent 1st time micro‐dissection testicular sperm extraction (micro‐TESE) that was done by fifteen different senior andrologists and a consequent undefined number of biologists assisting them in the operative rooms from January 2010 to May 2013 in a specialised IVF centre. Our study did not demonstrate any statistical significance between the mean age, the mean duration of infertility and finally, the mean of FSH levels of the patients with positive and negative micro‐TESE outcomes (p‐value 0.391, 0.543, 0.767 respectively). Moreover, our study did not demonstrate any association between different types of hormonal therapy prior to micro‐TESE and patients with positive micro‐TESE outcome (p‐value 0.219). Interestingly, our study showed positive associations between the testicular histopathology SCO (sertoli cell only syndrome) and high FSH and sperm retrieval rate (p < 0.001, 0.02 respectively). Logistic regression analysis revealed high statistical significance between sperm retrieval rate and high FSH level and testicular histopathology (OR 1.6, 0.21, 95% CI lower 1.2, 0.008 and upper 2.1, 0.06 and finally p 0.003, <0.001 respectively). This study reveals that preoperative testicular biopsy is unnecessary to predict the sperm retrieval rate in NOA patients.     

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update

Patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) were once considered to be infertile with few treatment options due to the absence of sperm in the ejaculate. In the last two decades, the advent of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and the application of various testicular sperm retrieval techniques, including fine needle aspiration (FNA), conventional testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) have revolutionized treatment in this group of men. Because most men with NOA will have isolated regions of spermatogenesis within the testis, studies have illustrated that sperm can be retrieved in most men with NOA, including Klinefelter''s syndrome (KS), prior history of chemotherapy and cryptorchidism. Micro-TESE, when compared with conventional TESE has a higher sperm retrieval rate (SRR) with fewer postoperative complications and negative effects on testicular function. In this article, we will compare the efficacy of the different procedures of sperm extraction, discuss the medical treatment and the role of testosterone optimization in men with NOA and describe the micro-TESE surgical technique. Furthermore, we will update our overall experience to allow counseling on the prognosis of sperm retrieval for the specific subsets of NOA.     

Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia

The development of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) opened a new era in the field of assisted reproduction and revolutionized the assisted reproductive technology protocols for couples with male factor infertility. Fertilisation and pregnancies can be achieved with spermatozoa recovered not only from the ejaculate but also from the seminiferous tubules. The most common methods for retrieving testicular sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) are testicular sperm aspiration (TESA: needle/fine needle aspiration) and open testicular biopsy (testicular sperm extraction: TESE). The optimal technique for sperm extraction should be minimally invasive and avoid destruction of testicular function, without compromising the chance to retrieve adequate numbers of spermatozoa to perform ICSI. Microdissection TESE (micro-TESE), performed with an operative microscope, is widely considered to be the best method for sperm retrieval in NOA, as larger and opaque tubules, presumably with active spermatogenesis, can be directly identified, resulting in higher spermatozoa retrieval rates with minimal tissue loss and low postoperative complications. Micro-TESE, in combination with ICSI, is applicable in all cases of NOA, including Klinefelter syndrome (KS). The outcomes of surgical sperm retrieval, primarily in NOA patients with elevated serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (NOA including KS patients), are reviewed along with the phenotypic features. The predictive factors for surgical sperm retrieval and outcomes of treatment were analysed. Finally, the short- and long-term complications in micro-TESE in both 46XY males with NOA and KS patients are considered.     

Effects of obesity on sperm retrieval,early embryo quality and clinical outcomes in men with nonobstructive azoospermia undergoing testicular sperm aspiration‐intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of body mass index (BMI) on sperm retrieval, early embryo quality and clinical outcomes in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) undergoing testicular sperm aspiration‐intracytoplasmic sperm injection (TESA‐ICSI). A total of 3,005 infertile couples were evaluated between January 2010 and June 2017, including 1585 normal‐weight (BMI < 25 kg/m²), 847 overweight (BMI 25–29.99 kg/m²) and 573 obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) patients. We found no significant relationship between BMI and sperm retrieval rate (22.4%, 24.3% and 25.1%, p = 0.327) or sperm motility. Among the 705 patients with NOA who underwent TESA‐ICSI cycles, obese individuals had lower T levels and higher E2 levels than normal‐weight and overweight individuals. However, there were no significant differences in other male hormones (follicle stimulating hormone [FSH], luteinizing hormone [LH], or prolactin [PRL]) among the groups. We also found that the sperm parameters, embryo quality and clinical outcomes of patients with NOA undergoing TESA‐ICSI were not influenced by high BMI levels. In conclusion, this study demonstrated a lack of obvious effects of obesity on sperm retrieval, early embryo quality and clinical outcomes in infertile men undergoing TESA‐ICSI cycles, although T and E2 levels were affected.     

Combined trifocal and microsurgical testicular sperm extraction is the best technique for testicular sperm retrieval in "low-chance" nonobstructive azoospermia

Background

There is no consensus for the best testicular sperm extraction (TESE) technique in patients with “low-chance” nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA).

Objective

To determine sperm retrieval rates in an intraindividual comparison using three locations of the testicle with and without the assistance of a microscope (microsurgical TESE [M-TESE]).

Design, setting, and participants

A series of 65 patients with low-chance NOA presenting with low testicular volume (<8 ml) and high serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (>12.4 IU/l) underwent trifocal-TESE plus M-TESE bilaterally (four biopsies per testis).

Intervention

Sperm retrieval was performed as trifocal-TESE (upper, middle, and lower testicular pole) with and without the assistance of a microscope in the middle incision.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The number of evaluated tubules, the mean spermatogenetic scores, and the sperm retrieval rates were evaluated to determine retrieval locations and the use of the microscope. The Friedman and Cochrane Q tests were applied to determine statistical differences. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used for the analysis of serum FSH and testicular volume as preoperative prognostic factors.

Results and limitations

The sperm retrieval success of 66.2% using the combined technique, meaning the percentage of patients with at least one tubule containing elongated spermatids, was the highest in the combination of trifocal- and M-TESE (p < 0.01), indicating this technique as optimal for patients with low-chance NOA. M-TESE and trifocal-TESE alone were not significantly better. The mean spermatogenetic score giving the number of tubules with elongated spermatids in relation to all tubules was significantly higher in M-TESE versus conventional TESE (p < 0.01), indicating the superior quality of the tissue harvested using the microscope. These results are limited by the definition of “success” using “one” spermatid/tubule. Preoperatively, high serum FSH and low testicular volumes did not exclude successful sperm retrieval.

Conclusions

The combination of trifocal- and M-TESE is the best technique to reach high sperm retrieval rates in patients with low-chance NOA.     

Impact of testicular histopathology as a predictor of sperm retrieval and pregnancy outcome in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: correlation with clinical and hormonal factors

In this study, our objective was to evaluate the impact of testicular histopathology on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia and correlate with clinical and hormonal parameters. For this purpose, 271 patients with nonobstructive azospermia (NOA) who underwent testicular sperm extraction (TESE) for ICSI cycles were retrospectively evaluated for sperm retrieval, fertilisation, embryo cleavage, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates among different testicular histology groups. We also correlated hormonal and clinical factors with histological findings. Sperm retrieval and fertilisation rates (FR) were found to be significantly different among all testicular histological groups of NOA except for embryo cleavage, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Furthermore, serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level was the most significant variable to predict sperm recovery on TESE. Separate analyses within each testicular histological group revealed that higher FSH was also associated with lower pregnancy rates in only maturation arrest group. In conclusion, testicular histology significantly influences sperm retrieval and FRs but not pregnancy and live birth rates in nonobstructive azoospermia. However, FSH is the best predictor of a successful TESE.     

The utility of optical loupe magnification for testis sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia

The testis of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) harbors sperm in approximately 30% to 60% of cases. Use of an operating microscope has been shown to result in better sperm retrieval rates. This investigation was undertaken to evaluate the ability of a modified microsurgical approach using magnifying loupes (3.5x) to improve the rates of sperm retrieval during testis sperm extraction (TESE). The study group consisted of patients with NOA who underwent TESE. Before December 1998, TESE was conducted in a standard fashion, and from 1999 on, loupe magnification was used. Comparison was made between the 2 groups with regard to sperm retrieval rates, need for bilateral TESE, and number of tunical incisions. Overall sperm retrieval rates did not differ between the 2 groups (45% vs 50%). However, in patients with testicular volumes of 10 mL or less, patients who underwent standard TESE had a retrieval rate of 27% compared with 42% when using the optical loupe magnification (P = .025). The use of loupe magnification may permit surgeons without access to or experience using an operating microscope to obtain better rates of sperm retrieval in men with NOA who have testicular volumes of 10 mL or less.     

Clinical analysis of patients with azoospermia factor deletions by microdissection testicular sperm extraction

Microdeletions of the azoospermia factor (AZF) locus on the Y chromosome have been implicated as a major genetic component of idiopathic male infertility, and the incidence of AZF deletions has been reported to be 15-20% in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Numerous studies have described AZF deletion rates in patients with azoospermia; however, a clinical comparison of azoospermic patients with AZF deletion and those with no deletion has not been reported well. A new technique for testicular sperm extraction, microdissection testicular sperm extraction (TESE), has been used widely on NOA patients. Although testicular spermatozoa are reliably detected and retrieved from NOA patients by microdissection TESE, sperm retrieval rates for patients with AZF deletions are not well known. Therefore, characteristics of NOA patients with AZF deletion were investigated. Six of 60 patients (10%) who underwent microdissection TESE were found to have AZF deletions by genomic polymerase chain reaction. Testicular data, outcome of sperm retrieval and endocrinological profiles, were compared between patients with AZF deletions (n = 6) and those with no deletions (n = 54). Testicular size, varicocele rates and testicular histology were similar between the groups. Significant differences were not detected in the endocrinological profiles. Sperm retrieval rates were not significantly different between the groups. In conclusion, AZF deletions do not appear to confer specific characteristics to NOA patients.     

无精子症患者睾丸内精子存在的评估

目的　检测无精子症患者睾丸内精子存在情况。　方法　睾丸活检病例 5 0例 ,每例均作血内分泌激素检测、睾丸体积测量、睾丸组织学检查及睾丸精子提取 (TESE) ,分析促卵泡生成素(FSH)、睾丸体积和睾丸组织学与睾丸内精子存在的相关性。　结果　血FSH和睾丸体积预测睾丸精子是否存在准确性不强 ,而睾丸组织学结果与TESE一致 (敏感性 96 % ,特异性 10 0 % ,准确性10 0 % )。　结论　血FSH高和睾丸体积小的无精子症患者 ,应行睾丸活检并同时行TESE以明确睾丸内是否有精子。     

Seminal plasma anti-Müllerian hormone level correlates with semen parameters but does not predict success of testicular sperm extraction (TESE)

AIM: To assess seminal plasma anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level relationships in fertile and infertile males. METHODS: Eighty-four male cases were studied and divided into four groups: fertile normozoospermia (n = 16), oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (n = 15), obstructive azoospermia (OA) (n = 13) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) (n = 40). Conventional semen analysis was done for all cases. Testicular biopsy was done with histopathology and fresh tissue examination for testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in NOA cases. NOA group was subdivided according to TESE results into unsuccessful TESE (n = 19) and successful TESE (n = 21). Seminal plasma AMH was estimated by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serum follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) was estimated in NOA cases only by radioimmunoassay (RIA). RESULTS: Mean seminal AMH was significantly higher in fertile group than in oligoasthenoteratozoospermia with significance (41.5 +/- 10.9 pmol/L vs. 30.5 +/- 10.3 pmol/L, P < 0.05). Seminal AMH was not detected in any OA patients. Seminal AMH was correlated positively with testicular volume (r = 0.329, P = 0.005), sperm count (r = 0.483, P = 0.007), sperm motility percent (r = 0.419, P = 0.021) and negatively with sperm abnormal forms percent (r = -0.413, P = 0.023). Nonsignificant correlation was evident with age (r = -0.155, P = 0.414) and plasma FSH (r = -0.014, P = 0.943). In NOA cases, seminal AMH was detectable in 23/40 cases, 14 of them were successful TESE (57.5%) and was undetectable in 17/40 cases, 10 of them were unsuccessful TESE (58.2%). CONCLUSION: Seminal plasma AMH is an absolute testicular marker being absent in all OA cases. However, seminal AMH has a poor predictability for successful testicular sperm retrieval in NOA cases.     

Comparison of efficacy of two techniques for testicular sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia: multifocal testicular sperm extraction versus multifocal testicular sperm aspiration

To compare the efficacy of 2 sperm-retrieval procedures, testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and testicular sperm aspiration (TESA), during the same procedure using the same subjects as their own controls. The presence of mature testicular sperm cells and motility were evaluated in 87 men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) by means of multifocal TESE and multifocal TESA, which were performed during the same procedure using the same subjects as their own controls. Sperm cells were recovered by TESE in 54 cases, but by TESA in only 36 cases. There were significantly more cases (n = 20) in which sperm cells were recovered by TESE only, compared with 2 cases in whom cells were recovered by TESA only (McNemar's test, P < .001). The mean number of locations in each testis in which sperm cells were detected was significantly higher in the TESE group. In significantly more cases (n = 27), motility was observed in TESE material only, compared with 3 cases in which motility was present in material extracted by TESA only (McNemar's test, P < .001). Mean number of locations in each testis with motile sperm cells was significantly higher in the TESE group. The TESE procedure yielded significantly more sperm cells, as was also reflected by the difference in number of straws with cryopreserved sperm. This comparative prospective clinical study revealed that multifocal TESE is more efficient than multifocal TESA for sperm detection and recovery in men with NOA and should be the procedure of choice for sperm retrieval for them.     

Correlation of genetic results with testicular histology,hormones and sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia patients with testis biopsy

To investigate the frequency and types of genetic results in different testicular histology of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), and correlated with hormones and sperm retrieval (SR), a retrospective study was conducted in 286 Chinese NOA patients who underwent testis biopsy and 100 age‐matched fertile men as the control group. Chromosome karyotype analyses were performed by the peripheral blood chromosome G‐band detection method. Screening of Y chromosome microdeletions of azoospermia factor (AZF) region was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of 11 sequence‐tagged sites (STS). The serum levels of follicle‐stimulating hormone, luteinising hormone and testosterone (T) and the appearance of scrotal ultrasound were also obtained. In 286 cases of NOA, 14.3% were found to have chromosomal alterations. The incidence of chromosomal abnormality was 2.8%. Sex chromosomal abnormalities were seen in six cases (four cases of Klinefelter's syndrome (47, XXY) and two cases of mosaics). The incidence of polymorphic chromosomal variants was 3% in the normal group and 11.5% in the NOA group. In total, 15.7% of NOA patients were found to have AZF microdeletions and AZF (c + d) was the most frequent one. The results of hormone and SR were found to be significantly different among all testicular histological types, whereas no significant differences were found when it comes to genetic alterations. It is concluded that the rate of cytogenetic alterations was high in NOA patients. So screening for chromosomal alterations and AZF microdeletions would add useful information for genetic counselling in NOA patients with testis biopsy and avoid vertical transmission of genetic defects by assisted reproductive technology.     

Open testicular mapping: A less invasive multiple biopsy approach for testicular sperm extraction

This study proposes a testicular sperm extraction technique that was inspired by testicular fine-needle aspiration. Here, we have described the technique of open testicular mapping (OTEM) and evaluated the successful sperm recovery in 92 patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). All patients underwent an OTEM biopsy. Patients were divided into two groups; group I included men with spermatozoa recovered and group 0 included men without spermatozoa recovered. Age, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level and testicular volume were compared between the groups. In 50 of 92 men (54%), viable spermatozoa were found after OTEM. No differences were noted in age, FSH level or testicular volume. Using OTEM, it was possible to retrieve spermatozoa in 54% of the NOA men.     

Anti-Müllerian hormone level as a predictor of sperm retrieval with microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia

Limited factors effectively predict sperm retrieval with microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. We therefore sought to evaluate the role of serum anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictive biomarker for successful sperm retrieval. We included patients with pre-operative anti-Müllerian hormone levels and stratified them based on prior history of prior sperm retrieval procedure. We compared hormone levels between those who did and did not have a successful sperm retrieval and used receiver operating curves to determine an optimal cut-off value. A total of 46 men were included, of whom 18 (39.1%) had no prior sperm retrieval and 11 (61.1%) had sperm successfully retrieved. Pre-operative serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels were predictive of sperm retrieval in patients with no prior attempts at retrieval (p = .03). Receiver operating curve for those without prior retrieval was 0.6753. The optimal anti-Müllerian hormone cut-off for those without prior sperm retrieval was 0.133 ng/ml with a sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.29. Therefore, serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels have modest predictive value for sperm retrieval in this cohort. The combination of clinical history, examination and laboratory investigations should continue to be used to guide surgeons in counselling patients regarding the chance of sperm retrieval.