两种BCR/ABL探针在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交检测中的不同信号模式及其意义

目的 比较BCR/ABL双色额外信号探针(dual color extra-signal BCR/ABL probe,ESFISH探针)及BCR/ABL双色双融合探针(dual color dual fusion BCR/ABL probe,D-FISH探针)在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测中信号模式的差异,探讨它们的诊断价值.方法 分别采用D-FISH和ES-FISH探针对74例伴有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)及37例伴有变异Ph易位或复杂核型异常的Ph阳性白血病患者骨髓细胞进行间期FISH检测.结果 所有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)易位的白血病患者应用两种探针均检测到BCR/ABL阳性信号,ES-FISH探针显示2个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号模式,而D-FISH探针显示1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号模式.ES-FISH探针在9例(12.2%)Ph阳性白血病患者中识别次要BCR断裂位点(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号),而D-FISH探针不能识别主要BCR和次要BCR断裂位点;D-FISH探针在8例(10.8%)Ph阳性白血病中区分ABL基因单独缺失(1个橙色信号、2个绿色信号、1个黄色信号)和ABL、BCR基因共同缺失(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号),ES-FISH则不能区分之.检测变异Ph易位和含Ph易位的复杂核型异常时,两种探针的信号模式分别有4种和6种之多,且以不典型者居多,对于它们的精确解释必须依赖常规染色体分析和中期FISH结果 .结论 ES-FISH及D-FISH探针由于BCR探针大小及覆盖区域不同,在Ph阳性白血病的FISH检测中显示不同信号模式,可分别作为Ph+急性淋巴细胞白血病和慢性髓系白血病患者FISH检测的首选.若采用伊马替尼治疗,主要BCR断裂点和次要BCR断裂点、伴或不伴有衍生9号染色体部分序列缺失均不影响预后,但鉴于ES-FISH探针性价比优于D-FISH探针,推荐其作为Ph阳性白血病FISH检测的首选.     

两种BCR/ABL探针在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交检测中的不同信号模式及其意义

目的 比较BCR/ABL双色额外信号探针(dual color extra-signal BCR/ABL probe,ESFISH探针)及BCR/ABL双色双融合探针(dual color dual fusion BCR/ABL probe,D-FISH探针)在Ph阳性白血病荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测中信号模式的差异,探讨它们的诊断价值.方法 分别采用D-FISH和ES-FISH探针对74例伴有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)及37例伴有变异Ph易位或复杂核型异常的Ph阳性白血病患者骨髓细胞进行间期FISH检测.结果 所有单纯t(9;22)(q34;q11)易位的白血病患者应用两种探针均检测到BCR/ABL阳性信号,ES-FISH探针显示2个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号模式,而D-FISH探针显示1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号模式.ES-FISH探针在9例(12.2%)Ph阳性白血病患者中识别次要BCR断裂位点(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和2个黄色信号),而D-FISH探针不能识别主要BCR和次要BCR断裂位点;D-FISH探针在8例(10.8%)Ph阳性白血病中区分ABL基因单独缺失(1个橙色信号、2个绿色信号、1个黄色信号)和ABL、BCR基因共同缺失(1个橙色信号、1个绿色信号和1个黄色信号),ES-FISH则不能区分之.检测变异Ph易位和含Ph易位的复杂核型异常时,两种探针的信号模式分别有4种和6种之多,且以不典型者居多,对于它们的精确解释必须依赖常规染色体分析和中期FISH结果 .结论 ES-FISH及D-FISH探针由于BCR探针大小及覆盖区域不同,在Ph阳性白血病的FISH检测中显示不同信号模式,可分别作为Ph+急性淋巴细胞白血病和慢性髓系白血病患者FISH检测的首选.若采用伊马替尼治疗,主要BCR断裂点和次要BCR断裂点、伴或不伴有衍生9号染色体部分序列缺失均不影响预后,但鉴于ES-FISH探针性价比优于D-FISH探针,推荐其作为Ph阳性白血病FISH检测的首选.     

双色双融合与额外信号探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中的比较及其意义

目的 探讨DCCF(dual color dual fusion)探针与ES(extra signal)探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中信号表现的特点,并明确其信号特征与染色体核型的相互关系.方法 对初治65例慢性粒细胞白血病(chronic myelocytic leukemia,CML)及50例急性淋巴细胞白血病(acute lymphoblastic leukemia,ALL)患者骨髓标本进行BCR/ABL的DCDF探针的荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测,FISH阳性标本则使用ES探针再次进行荧光原位杂交进行BCR断裂点的检测,同时对其中47例CML和40例ALL进行了核型分析.结果 FISH结果示65例CML均为BCR/ABL阳性,DCDFFISH中有17例为非典型信号表现,ES-FISH有12例为非典型信号表现;50例ALL中7例BCR/ABL阳性,ES探针显示5例BCR断裂点位于m-bcr,2例位于M-bcr.核型分析CML检出Ph阳性98%(43/44),ALL检出Ph阳性22%(7/32).结论 DCDF-FISH、ES-FISH以及核型分析各有其特性.根据每种方法的特性,对实验结果进行综合分析可对遗传学特征作出更准确判断.     

双色双融合与额外信号探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中的比较及其意义

目的 探讨DCCF(dual color dual fusion)探针与ES(extra signal)探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中信号表现的特点,并明确其信号特征与染色体核型的相互关系.方法 对初治65例慢性粒细胞白血病(chronic myelocytic leukemia,CML)及50例急性淋巴细胞白血病(acute lymphoblastic leukemia,ALL)患者骨髓标本进行BCR/ABL的DCDF探针的荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测,FISH阳性标本则使用ES探针再次进行荧光原位杂交进行BCR断裂点的检测,同时对其中47例CML和40例ALL进行了核型分析.结果 FISH结果示65例CML均为BCR/ABL阳性,DCDFFISH中有17例为非典型信号表现,ES-FISH有12例为非典型信号表现;50例ALL中7例BCR/ABL阳性,ES探针显示5例BCR断裂点位于m-bcr,2例位于M-bcr.核型分析CML检出Ph阳性98%(43/44),ALL检出Ph阳性22%(7/32).结论 DCDF-FISH、ES-FISH以及核型分析各有其特性.根据每种方法的特性,对实验结果进行综合分析可对遗传学特征作出更准确判断.     

双色双融合与额外信号探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中的比较及其意义

目的 探讨DCCF(dual color dual fusion)探针与ES(extra signal)探针在BCR/ABL融合基因检测中信号表现的特点,并明确其信号特征与染色体核型的相互关系.方法 对初治65例慢性粒细胞白血病(chronic myelocytic leukemia,CML)及50例急性淋巴细胞白血病(acute lymphoblastic leukemia,ALL)患者骨髓标本进行BCR/ABL的DCDF探针的荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测,FISH阳性标本则使用ES探针再次进行荧光原位杂交进行BCR断裂点的检测,同时对其中47例CML和40例ALL进行了核型分析.结果 FISH结果示65例CML均为BCR/ABL阳性,DCDFFISH中有17例为非典型信号表现,ES-FISH有12例为非典型信号表现;50例ALL中7例BCR/ABL阳性,ES探针显示5例BCR断裂点位于m-bcr,2例位于M-bcr.核型分析CML检出Ph阳性98%(43/44),ALL检出Ph阳性22%(7/32).结论 DCDF-FISH、ES-FISH以及核型分析各有其特性.根据每种方法的特性,对实验结果进行综合分析可对遗传学特征作出更准确判断.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the signal patterns of dual color dual fusion (DCDF) probe and extra signal (ES) probe in the detection of BCR/ABL fusion gene, and illustrate the relation between the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) pattern and the karyotype. Methods Sixty-five cases of chronic myelocytic leukemia(CML) and 50 cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were detected by FISH with DCDF probe, the BCR/ABL positive samples were detected by FISH with ES probe. Among these cases, 47 cases of CML and 40 cases of ALL perform conventional cytogenetics simultaneously. Results All 65 cases of CML were all BCR/ABL positive by FISH. 17 cases showed the atypical pattern by DCDFFISH, and 12 cases showed the atypical pattern by ES-FISH. There were 7 cases of BCR/ABL positive in 50 cases of ALL by FISH. By ES-FISH, there were 5 cases in which the break-point of BCR gene was located in m-bcr, 2 cases in which the break-point of BCR gene was located in M-bcr. Conventional cytogenetics demonstrated that 43/44(98 %) cases of CML and 7/32(22 %) cases of ALL were Ph positive.Conclusion The features of DCDF-FISH, ES-FISH and conventional eytogenetic are different from each other. According to the features of these method, it can increase the precision of the adjustment of genetic feature to analyze these results comprehensively.     

荧光原位杂交检测慢性粒细胞白血病

目的 探讨对慢性粒细胞白血病进行荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测的意义.方法 对158例慢性粒细胞白血病标本采用24 h短期培养法制备染色体,然后应用双色双融合BCR/ABL探针进行FISH检测,部分标本同时采用R显带技术进行染色体核型分析.结果 158例中共检出Ph阳性标本98例,其中69例(70.4%)为典型双色双融合BCR/ABL探针信号模式(1R1G2F),其余29例(29.6%)为3类12种非典型模式.各种非典型信号模式中出现频率较高的依次为:1R1G1F7例(7.1%)、2R1G1F 5例(5.1%)、1R1G2F&1R1G3F 4例(4.1%)、2R2G1F 3例(3.1%).对18例有核型资料的非典型信号的病例分析显示:其中3例特殊信号系由变异Ph易位引起;2例中出现的3个融合信号来源于附加的Ph染色体;4例核型与FISH结果不吻合,提示染色体分析存在错漏之处;3例染色体为典型Ph易位,而FISH结果为单个融合信号,系由der(9)号的部分缺失所致;3例核型中未发现Ph染色体.但FISH显示40%～64%的细胞中存在一个融合信号,从而明确慢性粒细胞白血病诊断;3例是移植或经格列卫治疗后的患者,染色体均为正常核型,而FISH检测到极小比例的阳性细胞.结论 FISH在慢性粒细胞白血病诊断、判断变异易位、隐匿Ph易位、衍生9号缺失、干扰素及格列卫的疗效观察以及移植后监测等诸多方面均具有重要价值.     

四例合并继发性der(9)t(9;22)(q34;q11)inv(9)(p22q34)异常的Ph阳性白血病的临床及分子遗传学研究

目的 探讨4例合并继发性der(9)t(9;22)(q34;q11)inv(9)(p22q34)异常的Ph阳性白血病的临床及分子遗传学特征.方法 应用骨髓细胞直接法或短期培养法制备染色体,经R显带进行核型分析.应用BCR/ABL双色双融合探针和9号染色体短臂及长臂涂染探针分别对4例伴有inv(9)(p22q34)的Ph阳性患者标本进行荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)和染色体涂染分析.用逆转录PCR检测BCR/ABL融合基因转录本.结果 1例急性髓细胞白血病患者核型中有3种克隆,分别为正常细胞、t(9;22)(q34；q11)异常细胞、同时合并der(9)t(9;22)衍生克隆和Ph以及其它异常,即t(8;12)(q12;p11),der(9) t(9；22)inv(9) (p22q34),der(22)t(9；22)细胞.其余3例慢性粒细胞白血病患者均同时合并Ph和der(9)t(9;22)(q34；q11)inv(9)(p22q34).FISH结果显示,3例有1红1绿两个融合信号、2红2绿1个融合信号、且在中期分裂相中发现1红1绿荧光信号分别位于9号染色体的两端；另1例67.5％的细胞有2红1绿1融合信号,有1绿色信号的缺失即表明BCR基因的缺失.染色体涂抹检测发现4例患者均有9号染色体的倒位.逆转录PCR检测均为b3a2转录本.该继发异常既可发生于Ph阳性CML慢性期或急变期,也可发生于原发性Ph阳性AML.该异常核型可能与预后不良相关.结论 合并继发性der(9)t(9;22)(q34；q11)inv(9)(p22q34)异常的Ph阳性白血病是一种少见但可再现的Ph继发性异常,具有独特的临床和分子遗传学特点.     

Ph阳性急性白血病的细胞遗传学和分子学概述

Ph染色体最初认为是慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)所特有。染色体显带技术问世后,发现大多数CML Ph染色体是t(9;22)(q34;q11)易位。分子学研究显示:染色体易位后(断裂点在bcr区),BCR与ABL基因融合成一个杂合基因,该基因转录成一个异常的杂合mRNA,进而翻译成为bcr-abl杂合蛋白即P21~(ber-abl)。60年代和70年代分别报导过Ph阳性急性粒细胞白血     

荧光原位杂交技术检测BCR/ABL融合基因的研究

目的建立荧光原位杂交技术平台,应用FISH技术检测在CML检测BCR/ABL融合基因,探讨FISH技术在在CML中应用的价值。方法应用FISH对BCR/ABL探针进行前期的验证,建立正常阈值,再应用该探针检测CML中BCR/ABL融合基因,进行临床检测评估。结果主要假阳性信号模式的正常阈值为1G1R1F 11%、1G1R2F 2%。75例样本FISH检测出48例阳性,15例经细胞遗传学检测,12例检测结果与FISH结果一致,3例CG为阴性,FISH检测为阳性。结论荧光原位杂交技术应用于临床检测之前应进行探针的前期验证,制定一套规范实验流程,且FISH技术在CML诊断、分型、临床治疗方案的制定、预后的判断以及微小残留病变检测上均有重要的价值。     

一例伴t(14;14)(q11;q32)易位的B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病的临床和分子细胞遗传学研究

目的 报告1例伴t(14;14)(q11;q32)易位的罕见B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-lineage acute lymphoblastie leukemia,B-ALL)病例,阐明其临床和分子细胞遗传学特征.方法 分析1例伴t(14;14)(q11;q32)易位B-ALL患者的临床资料;将患者骨髓细胞24h培养后按常规方法制备染色体标本,采用R显带技术进行核型分析;分别应用IGH双色断裂点分离探针、CEBPE双色断裂点分离探针、4号全染色体涂染探针和ALL组合探针进行荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)分析.结果 常规细胞遗传学分析显示患者核型为47,XX,+4,t(14;14)(q11;q32)[20],FISH分析进一步证实了这种核型异常.IGH双色断裂点分离探针FISH分析表明t(14;14)(q11;q32)易位累及IGH基因,CEBPE双色断裂点分离探针FISH分析提示t(14;14)(q11;q32)易位中IGH的伙伴基因为CEBPE基因.结论 在B-ALL中t(14;4)(q11;q32)易位同时累及IGH和CEBPE基因为少见的再现性遗传学异常,该异常可定义B-ALL中一种新的亚型.伴有t(14;14)(q11;q32) IGH/CEBPE易位的B-ALL患者可能预后较好.     

Interpretation of submicroscopic deletions of the BCR or ABL gene should not depend on extra signal-FISH: problems in interpretation of submicroscopic deletion of the BCR or ABL gene with extra signal-FISH

Several groups have demonstrated that a submicroscopic gene deletion in Ph+ chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is associated with a poor prognosis and reduced response to treatment. To assess the variation between detection methods in the interpretation of a submicroscopic gene deletion, we performed an extra signal (ES)-FISH BCR/ABL and double-FISH (D-FISH) BCR/ABL on frozen bone marrow cells from 79 patients with CML (63 in the chronic phase, 6 in the accelerated phase, and 10 in blast crisis) and 30 patients with a BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative disorder as determined by RT-PCR. The normal cutoff values were 0.22% for ES-FISH and 0.25% for D-FISH. The cutoff values for false-positive signals from a juxtaposition of the BCR and ABL gene were 11% in ES-FISH and 13% in D-FISH. Of the 14 patients who showed an ABL gene deletion by ES-FISH, 5 had an ABL deletion only, 5 had both a BCR and an ABL deletion, but 4 proved to have a classic BCR/ABL rearrangement without a submicroscopic deletion, as determined by D-FISH. Discrepant results between ES- and D-FISH were observed in 12 of the 79 patients (15.8%), and the main causes of a discrepancy were a false-positive ABL deletion (4 of 12, 33%), a variant Philadelphia chromosome (3 of 12, 25%), an inversion of derivative chromosome 9 at the very breakpoint of the ABL gene (9q32) (1 of 12, 8.3%), a cryptic variant Ph chromosome (1 of 12, 8.3%), and a marker chromosome (1 of 12, 8.3%). Although there was no significant difference in the sensitivity for the detection of the fusion signal between ES- and D-FISH, ES-FISH showed a high percentage of cells with false-positive fusion signals (1 orange, 1 green, 1 yellow), which makes it difficult to interpret the submicroscopic ABL deletion. In conclusion, an interpretation of the submicroscopic deletions of the BCR or ABL gene should not depend on ES-FISH.     

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization studies for the detection of 9q34 deletions in chronic myelogenous leukemia: a practical approach to clinical diagnosis

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is characterized by the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) in more than 90% of cases. Recent studies using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have shown that in a subset of patients with CML, deletions of 9q34 involving the argininosuccinate synthetase region occur at the time of the Philadelphia translocation and are associated with a poor prognosis. We performed interphase FISH studies in 152 cases of CML using a dual-color, dual-fusion probe system with a third probe directed at 9q34. Cytogenetic studies showed a simple (typical) Ph in 124/152 (82%), a cryptic Ph in 11/152 (7%), and a variant Ph chromosome with a complex translocation in 17/152 (11%) of cases. Interphase FISH studies showed single BCR/ABL fusion patterns in 48/152 (32%) of cases. Deletions of 9q34 were observed in 14% of all the cases and were present in 46% of cases with single BCR/ABL fusion pattern. All the 9q34 deletions occurred in cases with single BCR/ABL fusion signal. However, a single-fusion pattern is not specific for 9q34 deletions, and cases should be routinely screened for the presence of this prognostically significant abnormality by using a third probe directed specifically at 9q34.     

9q34 rearrangements in BCR/ABL fusion-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The t(9;22)(q11.2;q34) translocation is found in a subset of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The presence of this translocation involving the fusion of BCR/ABL genes represents a poor prognostic group. Because of the importance in detecting t(9;22) in ALL patients and because occasionally a cytogenetically cryptic BCR/ABL fusion is detected with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), our laboratory routinely performs BCR/ABL FISH tests on all newly diagnosed ALL patients. In the past year, 25 consecutive, newly diagnosed, untreated ALL cases were analyzed. We report the cytogenetics and FISH findings of three cases containing a rearranged 9q34 region with an intact BCR (22q11.2) region and an absence of the BCR/ABL fusion. A split ABL signal representing a translocation of the 9q34 region with chromosome segments other than 22q11.2 (BCR) was observed in 3 cases. Two of these patients were 3 years old; one was 21 at the time of diagnosis. A split ABL FISH signal without the involvement of BCR does not represent a t(9;22) translocation, and prognostic implications of this apparent subgroup of ALL cases have not been determined. Cytogenetic, pathologic, and clinical aspects of these three cases are presented.     

Deletions adjacent to BCR and ABL1 breakpoints occur in a substantial minority of chronic myeloid leukemia patients with masked Philadelphia rearrangements

Deletions at the t(9;22) breakpoint regions, found in 15% of chronic myeloid leukemia patients (CML) with an overt Philadelphia (Ph) translocation, are associated with an adverse disease prognosis in patients receiving interferon-alpha therapy. The incidence of deletions has been shown to vary for different cytogenetic subgroups of CML, with a significantly higher incidence of deletion in patients with a variant Ph translocation. To date, however, the frequency of such deletions in the subgroup of CML patients in whom the BCR/ABL1 fusion arises via submicroscopic chromosomal insertion (masked Ph) has not been investigated. We report the evaluation of 14 patients with masked Ph-positive CML for the presence of deletions extending 3' from BCR and 5' from ABL1 using two triple-color BCR/ABL probes. Deletions were identified in 3 patients (21%), encompassing sequences 5' to ABL1 in two of these and sequences 3' to BCR in the remaining patient, thus demonstrating that the phenomenon is a significant feature of the masked Ph CML subgroup. Furthermore, our findings are consistent with the notion that loss of genomic material is a potential side effect of any DNA breakage event at the 9q34.1 and 22q11.2 chromosomal regions, regardless of the subsequent mechanism of chromosomal rearrangement.