Neuronal activity in the caudal frontal eye fields of monkeys during memory-based smooth pursuit eye movements: comparison with the supplementary eye fields

Recently, we examined the neuronal substrate of predictive pursuit during memory-based smooth pursuit and found that supplementary eye fields (SEFs) contain signals coding assessment and memory of visual motion direction, decision not-to-pursue ("no-go"), and preparation for pursuit. To determine whether these signals were unique to the SEF, we examined the discharge of 185 task-related neurons in the caudal frontal eye fields (FEFs) in 2 macaques. Visual motion memory and no-go signals were also present in the caudal FEF but compared with those in the SEF, the percentage of neurons coding these signals was significantly lower. In particular, unlike SEF neurons, directional visual motion responses of caudal FEF neurons decayed exponentially. In contrast, the percentage of neurons coding directional pursuit eye movements was significantly higher in the caudal FEF than in the SEF. Unlike SEF inactivation, muscimol injection into the caudal FEF did not induce direction errors or no-go errors but decreased eye velocity during pursuit causing an inability to compensate for the response delays during sinusoidal pursuit. These results indicate significant differences between the 2 regions in the signals represented and in the effects of chemical inactivation suggesting that the caudal FEF is primarily involved in generating motor commands for smooth-pursuit eye movements.     

Smooth pursuit-related information processing in frontal eye field neurons that project to the NRTP

The cortical pursuit system begins the process of transforming visual signals into commands for smooth pursuit (SP) eye movements. The frontal eye field (FEF), located in the fundus of arcuate sulcus, is known to play a role in SP and gaze pursuit movements. This role is supported, at least in part, by FEF projections to the rostral nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis (rNRTP), which in turn projects heavily to the cerebellar vermis. However, the functional characteristics of SP-related FEF neurons that project to rNRTP have never been described. Therefore, we used microelectrical stimulation (ES) to deliver single pulses (50-200 microA, 200-micros duration) in rNRTP to antidromically activate FEF neurons. We estimated the eye or retinal error motion sensitivity (position, velocity, and acceleration) of FEF neurons during SP using multiple linear regression modeling. FEF neurons that projected to rNRTP were most sensitive to eye acceleration. In contrast, FEF neurons not activated following ES of rNRTP were often most sensitive to eye velocity. In similar modeling studies, we found that rNRTP neurons were also biased toward eye acceleration. Therefore, our results suggest that neurons in the FEF-rNRTP pathway carry signals that could play a primary role in initiation of SP.     

Eye-pursuit and reafferent head movement signals carried by pursuit neurons in the caudal part of the frontal eye fields during head-free pursuit

Eye and head movements are coordinated during head-free pursuit. To examine whether pursuit neurons in frontal eye fields (FEF) carry gaze-pursuit commands that drive both eye-pursuit and head-pursuit, monkeys whose heads were free to rotate about a vertical axis were trained to pursue a juice feeder with their head and a target with their eyes. Initially the feeder and target moved synchronously with the same visual angle. FEF neurons responding to this gaze-pursuit were tested for eye-pursuit of target motion while the feeder was stationary and for head-pursuit while the target was stationary. The majority of pursuit neurons exhibited modulation during head-pursuit, but their preferred directions during eye-pursuit and head-pursuit were different. Although peak modulation occurred during head movements, the onset of discharge usually was not aligned with the head movement onset. The minority of neurons whose discharge onset was so aligned discharged after the head movement onset. These results do not support the idea that the head-pursuit-related modulation reflects head-pursuit commands. Furthermore, modulation similar to that during head-pursuit was obtained by passive head rotation on stationary trunk. Our results suggest that FEF pursuit neurons issue gaze or eye movement commands during gaze-pursuit and that the head-pursuit-related modulation primarily reflects reafferent signals resulting from head movements.     

The location probability effects of saccade reaction times are modulated in the frontal eye fields but not in the supplementary eye field

The visual system constantly utilizes regularities that are embedded in the environment and by doing so reduces the computational burden of processing visual information. Recent findings have demonstrated that probabilistic information can override attentional effects, such as the cost of making an eye movement away from a visual target (antisaccade cost). The neural substrates of such probability effects have been associated with activity in the superior colliculus (SC). Given the immense reciprocal connections to SC, it is plausible that this modulation originates from higher oculomotor regions, such as the frontal eye field (FEF) and the supplementary eye field (SEF). To test this possibility, the present study employed theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to selectively interfere with FEF and SEF activity. We found that TMS disrupted the effect of location probability when TMS was applied over FEF. This was not observed in the SEF TMS condition. Together, these 2 experiments suggest that the FEF plays a critical role not only in initiating saccades but also in modulating the effects of location probability on saccade production.     

Pursuit and saccadic eye movement subregions in human frontal eye field: a high-resolution fMRI investigation.

Recent positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies in humans have localized the frontal eye field (FEF) to the precentral sulcus (PCS). In macaque monkeys, low-threshold microstimulation and single unit recording studies have located a saccadic subregion of FEF in a restricted area along the anterior wall of the arcuate sulcus and a pursuit subregion located deeper in the sulcus close to the fundus. The functional organization and anatomical location of these two FEF subregions are still to be defined in humans. In the present study, we used fMRI with high spatial resolution image acquisition at 3.0 Tesla to map the saccade- and pursuit-related areas of FEF within the two walls of the PCS in 11 subjects. We localized the saccade-related area to the upper portion of the anterior wall of the precentral sulcus and the pursuit-related area to a deeper region along the anterior wall, extending in some subjects to the fundus or deep posterior wall. These findings localize distinct pursuit and saccadic subregions of FEF in humans and demonstrate a high degree of homology in the organization of these FEF subregions in the human and the macaque monkey.     

TMS evidence for smooth pursuit gain control by the frontal eye fields

Smooth pursuit eye movements are used to continuously track slowly moving visual objects. A peculiar property of the smooth pursuit system is the nonlinear increase in sensitivity to changes in target motion with increasing pursuit velocities. We investigated the role of the frontal eye fields (FEFs) in this dynamic gain control mechanism by application of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Subjects were required to pursue a slowly moving visual target whose motion consisted of 2 components: a constant velocity component at 4 different velocities (0, 8, 16, and 24 deg/s) and a superimposed high-frequency sinusoidal oscillation (4 Hz, +/-8 deg/s). Magnetic stimulation of the FEFs reduced not only the overall gain of the system, but also the efficacy of the dynamic gain control. We thus provide the first direct evidence that the FEF population is significantly involved in the nonlinear computation necessary for continuously adjusting the feedforward gain of the pursuit system. We discuss this with relation to current models of smooth pursuit.     

MEG tomography of human cortex and brainstem activity in waking and REM sleep saccades

We recorded the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) signal from three subjects before, during and after eye movements cued to a tone, self-paced, awake and during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. During sleep we recorded the MEG signal throughout the night together with electroencephalographic (EEG) and electromyographic (EMG) channels to construct a hypnogram. While awake, just prior to and during eye movements, the expected well time-locked physiological activations were imaged in pontine regions, with early 3 s priming. Activity in the frontal eye fields (FEF) was identified in the 300 ms before the saccade onset. Visual cortex activation occurred 200 ms after saccades. During REM, compared to the eyes closed awake condition, activity was higher in supplementary motor area (SMA) and lower in inferior parietal and precuneus cortex. Electro-occulographic (EOG) activity just prior to REM saccades correlated with bilateral pontine and FEF activity some 250-400 ms before REM saccade onset, which in turn was preceded 200 ms earlier by reciprocal activation of the pons and FEF. An orbitofrontal-amygdalo-parahippocampal-pontine sequence, possibly related to emotional activation during REM sleep, was identified in the last 100 ms leading to the REM saccade, but not linked to saccade initiation.     

The planning and guiding of reading saccades: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

A previous positron emission tomography study that investigated the cortical areas involved in directing eye movements during text reading showed two areas of extra-occipital asymmetry: left > right posterior parietal cortex (PPC), and right > left frontal eye-field (FEF). We used the temporal resolution of repetitive TMS (rTMS) to isolate the contributions of the left and right PPC and FEF to the planning and execution of rightward reading saccades. We present eye-movement data collected during text reading, which involves the initiation and maintenance of a series of saccades (scanpath). rTMS over the left but not right PPC slowed reading speeds for the whole array of words, indicating that this area is involved throughout the scanpath. rTMS over the right but not the left FEF slowed the time to make the first saccade, but only when triggered before the stimuli appeared, demonstrating that the role of this region is in the preparation of the scanpath. Our results are compatible with the hypotheses that the left PPC maintains reading saccades along a line of text while the right FEF is involved in the preparation of the motor plan for the scanpath at the start of each new line of text.     

Foot,hand, face and eye representation in the human striatum

The present study aimed at determining the three-dimensional organization of striatal activation during foot, hand, face and eye movements. Seven right-handed, healthy volunteers were studied at 1.5 T using blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) contrast. The tasks consisted of self-paced flexion/extension of the right and left fingers and right toes, contraction of the lips and saccadic eye movements. For foot, hand and face movements, striatal activation was mainly found in the putamen with a somatotopical organization, the foot area being dorsal, the face area more ventral and medial, the hand area in between. Overlap between somatotopic territories was present, more prominent for hand-face than for foot-face or foot-hand areas. In the putamen, the activated areas of the ipsi- and contralateral hand areas were not identical, suggesting a partial segregation of the ipsi- and contralateral striatal sensorimotor projections. For saccadic eye movements, bilateral activation was observed at the junction between the body and the head of the caudate nucleus and in the right putamen. These data present evidence for a somatotopic organization of the human striatum which corresponds with the topography of corticostriatal projections described in the non-human primates.     

The contribution of the human FEF and SEF to smooth pursuit initiation

Smooth pursuit eye movements function to keep moving targets foveated. Behavioral studies have shown that pursuit is particularly effective for predictable target motion. There is evidence that both the frontal eye field (FEF) and supplementary eye field (SEF) (also known as the dorsomedial frontal cortex) contribute to pursuit control. The goal of the current experiment was to determine whether these 2 areas made different contributions to the initiation of pursuit in response to predictable compared with unpredictable target motion. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used in 5 healthy human participants to temporarily disrupt each area around the time of target motion onset. TMS over the FEF delayed contraversive pursuit markedly more than ipsiversive pursuit and this direction-dependent difference was more deeply modulated during pursuit of unpredictable than predictable target motion. By contrast, TMS over the SEF resulted in a much more muted modulation of pursuit latency that was similar across both predictable and unpredictable conditions. Taken together, we conclude that the human FEF, but not the SEF, makes a significant contribution to the processing required during the preparation of contraversive pursuit responses to unpredictable target motion and this contribution is less vital during pursuit to predictable target motion.     

Brain and behavior: a task-dependent eye movement study

Recent electrophysiological and behavioral studies have found similarities in the neurology of pursuit and saccadic eye movements. In a previous study on eye movements using closely matched paradigms for pursuit and saccades, we revealed that both exhibit bimodal distributions of latency to predictable (PRD) and randomized (RND) stimuli; however, the latency to each type of stimulus was different, and there was more segregation of latencies in saccades than pursuit (Burke MR, Barnes GR. 2006. Quantitative differences in smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans. Exp Brain Res. 175(4):596-608). To investigate the brain areas involved in these tasks, and to search for correlates of behavior, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging during equivalent PRD and RND target presentations. In the contrast pursuit > saccades, which reflects velocity-dependent versus position-dependent activities, respectively, we found higher activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for pursuit and in the frontopolar region for saccades. In the contrast RND > PRD, which principally reflects activation related to visually driven versus memory-driven responses, respectively, we found a higher sustained level of activation in the frontal eye fields during visually guided eye movements. The reverse contrast revealed higher activity for the memory-guided responses in the supplementary eye fields and the superior parietal lobe. In addition, we found learning-related activation during the PRD condition in visual area V5, the DLPFC, and the cerebellum.     

Anaesthesia and saccadic eye movements

During the last 10 years, there has been a vast increase in day-case surgery under general anaesthesia, but this has not been accompanied by research into the residual cognitive and motor effects during recovery from anaesthesia. Part of the explanation for this phenomenon is the lack of a suitable biophysical monitor of anaesthetic sedation. This review discusses one of the most commonly used of these biophysical monitors - namely saccadic eye movements. In particular, the efficacy of peak saccadic velocity as a monitor of sedation will be evaluated. In addition, the physiology and pharmacology of saccadic eye movements will be discussed within the context of developing other parameters of saccadic eye movements as novel biophysical monitors of anaesthetic sedation.     

Modulation of antisaccades by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field

It has been suggested that the frontal eye field (FEF), which is involved with the inhibition and generation of saccades, is engaged to a different degree in pro- and antisaccades. Pro- and antisaccades are often assessed in separate experimental blocks. In such cases, saccade inhibition is required for antisaccades but not for prosaccades. To more directly assess the role of the FEF in saccade inhibition and generation, a new paradigm was used in which inhibition was necessary on pro- and antisaccade trials. Participants looked in the direction indicated by a target ('<' or '>') that appeared in the left or right visual field. When the pointing direction and the location were congruent, prosaccades were executed; otherwise antisaccades were required. Saccadic latencies were measured in blocks without and with single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the right FEF or a right posterior control site. Results showed that antisaccades generated into the hemifield ipsilateral to the TMS were significantly delayed after TMS over the FEF, but not the posterior control site. This result is interpreted in terms of a modulation of saccade inhibition to the contralateral visual field due to disruption of processing in the FEF.     

Cortical mechanisms for shifting and holding visuospatial attention

Access to visual awareness is often determined by covert, voluntary deployments of visual attention. Voluntary orienting without eye movements requires decoupling attention from the locus of fixation, a shift to the desired location, and maintenance of attention at that location. We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to dissociate these components while observers shifted attention among 3 streams of letters and digits, one located at fixation and 2 in the periphery. Compared with holding attention at the current location, shifting attention between the peripheral locations was associated with transient increases in neural activity in the superior parietal lobule (SPL) and frontal eye fields (FEF), as in previous studies. The supplementary eye fields and separate portions of SPL and FEF were more active for decoupling attention from fixation than for shifting attention to a new location. Large segments of precentral sulcus (PreCS) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) were more active when attention was maintained in the periphery than when it was maintained at fixation. We conclude that distinct subcomponents of the dorsal frontoparietal network initiate redeployments of covert attention to new locations and disengage attention from fixation, while sustained activity in lateral regions of PPC and PreCS represents sustained states of peripheral attention.     

Modulation of visual responses in macaque frontal eye field during covert tracking of invisible targets

The purpose of this study was to investigate the interaction between internal representations of invisible moving targets and visual responses of neurons in frontal eye fields (FEFs). Monkeys were trained to make saccades to the extrapolated position of a target that was temporarily rendered invisible for variable durations as if it had passed behind an occluder. Flashed, task-irrelevant visual probe stimuli were used to study the visual responsiveness of FEF neurons during this task. Probes were flashed at various times and locations during the occlusion interval. Net changes in neuronal activity were obtained by comparing the activity on trials with probes with randomly interleaved trials without any probe. Most neurons showed an increase in firing rate in response to the probe, but some showed a decrease. Both types of responses were enhanced when the invisible target moved toward the receptive field (RF) as compared with trials on which the target moved away from the RF. Some neurons showed a spatial shift in the visual response during the occlusion interval. For cells that were excited by the probe, the shift tended to be correlated with the direction of motion of the target, whereas for cells that were inhibited the shift tended to be in the opposite direction. These results suggest that the role of FEF in predicting invisible target motion includes a sensory/perceptual component.     

Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: an FMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements

Passive viewing of biological motion engages extensive regions of the posterior temporal-occipital cortex in humans, particularly within and nearby the superior temporal sulcus (STS). Relatively little is known about the functional specificity of this area. Some recent studies have emphasized the perceived intentionality of the motion as a potential organizing principle, while others have suggested the existence of a somatotopy based upon the limb perceived in motion. Here we conducted an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment to compare activity elicited by movement of the eyes, mouth or hand. Each motion evoked robust activation in the right posterior temporal-occipital cortex. While there was substantial overlap of the activation maps in this region, the spatial distribution of hemodynamic response amplitudes differentiated the movements. Mouth movements elicited activity along the mid-posterior STS while eye movements elicited activity in more superior and posterior portions of the right posterior STS region. Hand movements activated more inferior and posterior portions of the STS region within the posterior continuing branch of the STS. Hand-evoked activity also extended into the inferior temporal, middle occipital and lingual gyri. This topography may, in part, reflect the role of particular body motions in different functional activities.     

Theta-burst stimulation over human frontal cortex distorts perceptual stability across eye movements

We perceive a stable outside world despite the constant changes of visual input induced by our eye movements. Internal monitoring of a corollary discharge associated with oculomotor commands may help to anticipate the perceptual consequences of impending eye movements. The primate frontal eye fields have repeatedly been presumed to participate in the maintenance of perceptual stability across eye movements. However, a direct link between integrity of frontal oculomotor areas and perceptual stability is missing so far. Here, we show that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the right human frontal cortex impairs the integration of visual space across eye movements. We asked 9 healthy subjects to report the direction of transsaccadic stimulus displacements and applied TMS before the actual experiment in a novel offline stimulation protocol, continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS). A systematic perceptual distortion was observed after stimulation over the right frontal cortex that was best explained by an internal underestimation of executed eye movement amplitudes. cTBS apparently disturbed an internal prediction process for contraversive saccades, while the metrics of associated oculomotor actions remained unchanged. Our findings suggest an important role of the frontal cortex in the internal monitoring of oculomotor actions for the perceptual integration of space across eye movements.     

The frontal cortex of the rat and visual attentional performance: dissociable functions of distinct medial prefrontal subregions

A previous study using a rodent five-choice test of attention found poor choice accuracy and increased perseverative responding following medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) lesions. As this rat cortical area includes at least two anatomically distinguishable subregions, the present study investigated their specific contributions to performance of this task. Rats were trained on the five-choice task prior to receiving excitotoxic lesions or sham surgery. In the first experiment, lesions of the dorsal mPFC (Zilles's Cg1) resulted in poor accuracy, but no changes in perseverative responding. Introducing variable delays for stimulus presentation abolished these accuracy deficits, suggesting that Cg1-lesioned rats were impaired at using temporal cues to guide performance. In the second experiment, lesions of the ventral mPFC increased perseverative responding, but had only short-lasting effects on accuracy. Rats with complete mPFC lesions had both choice accuracy impairments and increased perseverative responding. Additional evidence of the functional dissociation of dorsal and ventral mPFC came from the analysis of the spatial and temporal distribution of the correct and incorrect responses. Only rats with ventral mPFC lesions showed delay-dependent deficits and bias towards a location that had recently been associated with reward. Taken together, these results suggest dissociable 'executive' functions of mPFC subregions. Circuits centred on Cg1 are critical for the temporal organization of behaviour, while networks involving the ventral mPFC are important for maintaining behavioural flexibility.     

Shape discrimination deficits during reversible deactivation of area V4 in the macaque monkey

The role of area V4 in the primate extrastriate cortex has received much attention in recent years. However, the deficit specificity following area V4 ablations has been difficult to determine due to the ablations including area V4 and additional adjacent areas, deficit attenuation and the numerous variations in the results of different research teams. In order to address these issues, we examined the role of area V4 during reversible deactivation of the lower visual field representation within this area while macaque monkeys performed simple pattern discriminations and their eye position was monitored. Specifically, the monkeys were trained to perform a match-to-sample task with the sample stimulus placed within or outside the visual field quadrant represented within the deactivated region of area V4. The sample and match stimuli had the same salience (same size or luminance). Using this approach, we identified significant simple shape discrimination deficits during deactivation of area V4 that did not attenuate with time. Deficits were also identified when the discriminanda were the same figure viewed at different orientations (rotated shapes). In contrast, no deficits were identified during simple hue discriminations. Furthermore, no saccadic eye movement deficits were identified during deactivation of area V4. Therefore, we conclude that deactivation of area V4 yields specific deficits on simple and rotated shape discriminations. These results show that area V4 is an important step in shape and form processing along the ventral visual stream leading to the inferotemporal cortex.