Rapid immunodiagnosis of active cytomegalovirus infection by monoclonal antibody staining of blood leucocytes

The appearance of cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigen positive blood leucocytes (CMV antigenaemia) was investigated in 52 renal transplant recipients during the first three months after transplantation. Using a mixture of three monoclonal antibodies, CMV (immediate early) antigens were detected in cytocentrifuged blood leucocytes within 3-5 h after sampling. The results were related to virus isolation from buffy coats (CMV viraemia), serology with a sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and clinical symptoms of CMV disease. The antigen test was positive in all 14 patients with CMV viraemia, in 25 out of 27 of patients with serological evidence of primary or secondary CMV infection, and in 2 out of 25 patients without active infection. In patients with a clinical CMV syndrome the presence of CMV antigen (CMV-Ag) positive blood cells correspond with the period of signs and symptoms. CMV antigens were not detected in 23 out of 25 patients without active infection, nor in healthy controls and patients with other herpesvirus infections. CMV-Ag positive blood cells appeared, on average, nine days before serological signs of active infection. This method provides a rapid and sensitive approach to CMV detection, enabling early clinical diagnosis and subsequent tapering of immunosuppression or commencement of antiviral therapy.     

Cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Current status, known challenges, and future strategies.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Significant progress has been made in the prevention of CMV disease over the past decade, but prevention of late CMV disease continues to be a challenge in selected high-risk populations. The pretransplantation CMV serostatus of the donor and/or recipient remains an important risk factor for posttransplantation outcome despite the use of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy; CMV-seropositive recipients of T cell-depleted grafts in particular continue to have a survival disadvantage compared with seronegative recipients with seronegative donors. The risk of developing antiviral drug resistance remains low in most patients; however, in a setting of intense immunosuppression (eg, after transplantation from a haploidentical donor), the incidence may be as high as 8%. Primary CMV infection via blood transfusion can be reduced by the provision of seronegative or leukocyte-depleted blood products; however, a small risk of 1% to 2% of CMV disease remains. Surveillance and preemptive therapy are effective in preventing the sequelae of transfusion-related CMV infection. Indirect immunomodulatory effects of CMV are increasingly recognized in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Strategies currently being investigated include long-term suppression of CMV with valganciclovir for the prevention of late CMV infection and disease, adoptive transfer of CMV-specific T cells, and donor and recipient vaccination strategies.     

Comparative clinical manifestations and immune effects of cytomegalovirus infections following distinct types of immunosuppression

BackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a well-recognised complication of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplantation. However, CMV infection also occurs in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, previously immunocompetent intensive care unit patients, and individuals on immunosuppressive medications for various underlying diseases.ObjectivesThis review describes the comparative effects of CMV infection in distinct types of acquired immunosuppression.SourcesSelected peer-reviewed publications on CMV infections published until December 2021.ContentCMV infection affects various organ systems through direct cytolytic mechanisms but may also exert indirect effects by promoting pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive responses. This has been well studied in transplant recipients, for whom antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy have now become standard practice. These strategies not only prevent direct CMV disease manifestations but also mitigate various immunopathological processes to reduce graft-vs.-host disease, graft rejection, and the occurrence of secondary bacterial and fungal infections. The efficacy of neither prophylactic nor pre-emptive treatment of CMV infection has been demonstrated for patients with critical illness- or medication-induced immunosuppression. Many observational studies have shown an independent association between CMV reactivation and a prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation or increased mortality in the intensive care unit. Furthermore, data suggest that CMV reactivation may increase pulmonary inflammation and prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation.ImplicationsA large number of observational and experimental studies suggest attributable morbidity and mortality related to CMV infection, not only in transplant recipients and patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection but also in patients with critically illness- or medication-induced immunosuppression. Adequately powered randomised controlled trials investigating the efficacy of prophylaxis or pre-emptive treatment of CMV infection in these patients are lacking, with a notable exception for transplant recipients.     

Hepatitis C therapy with long term remission after renal transplantation

Hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and long observation periods have shown the detrimental effect of HCV infection on patient and graft survival after renal transplantation. At present, interferon is the most important agent for the treatment of hepatitis C in ESRD; however, limited information exists concerning the long-term response of patients who undergo renal transplantation after successful antiviral therapy. We describe the evolution of HCV infection in a dialysis patient with hepatitis C who was successfully treated with interferon alpha and then underwent renal transplantation. He received aggressive immunosuppression during the induction phase and for allograft rejection; however, regular screening showed complete absence of biochemical and virological relapse of HCV over a 6-year post-transplantation period. We conclude that interferon can offer excellent response in selected dialysis patients with hepatitis C. Alternative strategies with newer antiviral agents are currently under active investigation.     

CMV Infection in Bone Marrow and Solid Organ Transplant Patients in the Era of Antiviral Prophylaxis

Recent developments in the diagnosis and therapy of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection have helped to reduce CMV-associated morbidity and mortality following allogeneic bone marrow and solid organ transplantation. The clinical symptoms of active CMV infection and the prevalence of life-threatening CMV disease vary widely between different patient populations according to the type of transplant and the intensity of immunosuppression employed. Antiviral prophylaxis with aciclovir, valaciclovir and ganciclovir has been shown to reduce CMV infection and disease following organ transplantation. Antiviral drugs, in particular ganciclovir and foscarnet, have varying sideeffects, however, and antiviral resistance due to prolonged administration of ganciclovir and foscarnet has been reported recently. Short courses of pre-emptive antiviral therapy for documented CMV infection help to reduce the duration and sideeffects of therapy, offering an alternative strategy to antiviral prophylaxis. Studies are required to compare the efficacy and costs of antiviral prophylaxis with pre-emptive therapy.     

Cytomegalovirus Infection Incidence and Risk Factors Across Diverse Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Platforms Using a Standardized Monitoring and Treatment Approach: A Comprehensive Evaluation from a Single Institution

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. Disruption of or weak reconstitution of virus-specific cellular immune function, such as with certain HCT approaches, poses significant risk for CMV-related complications. The incidence of and risk factors for CMV infection and the nature of CMV disease were evaluated retrospectively among 356 consecutive HCT recipients transplanted at the National Institutes of Health using all graft sources, including bone marrow, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC), and umbilical cord blood (UCB), and a range of in vivo and ex vivo approaches for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The cumulative incidence of CMV infection was higher for CMV-seropositive recipients at 33%, regardless of donor CMV serostatus. Patients transplanted with CMV-seropositive donors had a significantly shorter duration of antiviral therapy. Among graft sources UCB was associated with the highest cumulative incidence of CMV infection at 65% and significantly longer treatment duration at a median of 36days, whereas PBSC HCT was associated with the lowest incidence at 26% and the shortest CMV treatment duration at a median of 21days. There were significant differences in the cumulative incidence of CMV infection by T cell manipulation strategy when systemic steroids were included as a risk-modifying event. Over one-third of CMV infections occurred in the setting of systemic steroid administration. CMV disease occurred in 5% of HCT recipients, with 70% of cases in the setting of treatment for GVHD. Although factors related to serostatus, graft source, and GVHD prophylaxis were associated with varied CMV infection incidence, unplanned post-HCT corticosteroid therapy contributed greatly to the incidence of both CMV infection and disease across HCT approaches, highlighting this post-HCT intervention as a key time to potentially tailor the approach to monitoring, preemptive therapy, and even prophylaxis.     

Immune response to CMV in solid organ transplant recipients: current concepts and future directions

Despite advances in immunosuppression and antiviral therapy, CMV continues to be a significant opportunistic pathogen adversely affecting the outcome of solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. While a significant proportion of CMV disease is caused by reactivation of latent virus, the risk is highest among CMV donor+ and recipient- SOT patients. CMV is responsible for both direct (e.g., pneumonitis, colitis) and indirect (e.g., rejection, atherosclerosis) morbidity and mortality. Healthy CMV-seropositive individuals have a high frequency of CMV-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells that provide immune protection by limiting CMV reactivation and replication. Changes to the innate and adaptive immune system from immunosuppressive therapy following SOT contribute to CMV disease pathogenesis. CMV disease after SOT is associated with poorer outcomes, thus novel strategies to prevent it are an area of active research. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge on the immune response to CMV following SOT.     

The impact of prophylactic antiviral agents and statin administration on graft longevity in kidney allograft recipients

Context: In an earlier study, we compared the duration of kidney graft survival between two groups of recipients; one on triple (cyclosporine, prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil) and the other on quadruple (cyclosporine, prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil, and sirolimus) immunosuppressive therapy. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of antiviral and statin therapy on graft longevity. Materials and methods: One hundred five kidney allograft recipients were preoperatively assessed for serological markers of infection with various viral agents. All patients were on a prophylactic antiviral regimen of acyclovir and gancyclovir. Seventeen patients were on a statin. Patients were monitored for viral infections and graft rejection or loss for period of 3 years posttransplantation. Results: We detected a high preoperative prevalence rate of IgG immunoglobulins versus the latency-establishing Herpesviridae viruses. Two patients who were preoperatively IgG positive for CMV had cytomegalovirus disease after transplantation. One patient who was preoperatively IgG positive for VZV had shingles after the surgery. No other confirmed viral infections were reported. Thirteen of 88 patients (14.77%) whose treatment regimen did not include a statin suffered a rejection episode or lost the graft whereas 1 of 17 patients (5.88%) on a statin had a rejection episode. Conclusions: The low rate of viral infections observed in our study population supports the utility of prophylactic administration of antiviral agents to transplant recipients. However, statins seem to have a protective effect on graft longevity (odds ratio [OR]?=?0.361, 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?0.044-2.957).     

Clinical significance of the single nucleotide polymorphism TLR2 R753Q in heart transplant recipients at risk for cytomegalovirus disease

BackgroundThe toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) is a significant component of innate immunity against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection but information on the clinical significance of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (R753Q) is conflicting.ObjectivesThe inconsistent observations of the immunological and clinical significance of the TLR2 R753Q polymorphism for CMV infection indicates the influence of confounders.Study designThe presence of the TLR2 polymorphism was determined by a genotyping assay of 175 HTX patients and 281 healthy blood donors and evaluated in relation to selected virological and clinical parameters.ResultsRelative frequency of TLR2 polymorphism was similar in HTX patients and blood donors (homozygous wild-type, 94.3% vs. 94.0%; heterozygous, 5.1% vs. 5.7%; homozygous mutated, <1%). CMV viremia was detectable in 108 (61.7%) of HTX patients. The TLR2 polymorphism was neither associated with occurrence or level of CMV infection nor with survival, graft failure or rejection, or CMV serostatus of patient before transplantation. Nevertheless, CMV viremia occurred in 83.1% of R+/D+, 77.1% of R+/D-, and 64.3% of R-/D+ patients. Time of first CMV viremia was in R-/D+ patients later than in CMV-seropositive patients (median, 182 days versus 23 days; P < 0.001) corresponding to the duration of antiviral prophylaxis in R-/D+ patients.ConclusionsThe TLR2 R753Q polymorphism is extremely rare in the general population and HTX patients. Screening for this risk factor of CMV disease may not be cost-effective in contrast to testing for CMV viremia.     

Immune response to CMV in solid organ transplant recipients: current concepts and future directions

Despite advances in immunosuppression and antiviral therapy, CMV continues to be a significant opportunistic pathogen adversely affecting the outcome of solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. While a significant proportion of CMV disease is caused by reactivation of latent virus, the risk is highest among CMV donor+ and recipient- SOT patients. CMV is responsible for both direct (e.g., pneumonitis, colitis) and indirect (e.g., rejection, atherosclerosis) morbidity and mortality. Healthy CMV-seropositive individuals have a high frequency of CMV-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells that provide immune protection by limiting CMV reactivation and replication. Changes to the innate and adaptive immune system from immunosuppressive therapy following SOT contribute to CMV disease pathogenesis. CMV disease after SOT is associated with poorer outcomes, thus novel strategies to prevent it are an area of active research. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge on the immune response to CMV following SOT.     

Glomerulopathy in renal allografts from patients with and without active Cytomegalovirus infection

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection may affect renal graft survival, and a distinctive diffuse glomerulopathy has been described in renal grafts from patients with an active CMV infection. Fifty renal graft biopsies taken 30 to 180 days post-transplant from patients with primary, reactivated, inactive and no CMV infection were examined retrospectively for evidence of this glomerulopathy without knowledge of CMV status. The lesion was found in seven of 30 patients with reactivated CMV infection, one of 12 with primary infection, two of two with no evidence of active infection but evidence of previous infection, and in four of six with no evidence of past or present infection. The differences were not statistically significant. We concluded that the previously described distinctive diffuse glomerulopathy is not specifically associated with CMV infection, but may be a sign of graft rejection.     

抗CD3单克隆抗体在预防肾移植术后急性排斥反应中的作用

目的 :观察抗CD3单克隆抗体在预防肾移植术后急性排斥反应的作用。方法 :16 4例肾移植患者分为两组 ,4 2例移植术后应用抗CD3单克隆抗体 (5mg d)为治疗组 ;其它 12 2例为对照组。观察移植术后人 肾存活率、急性排斥反应及CMV感染的发生率。结果 :治疗组 1年、2年及 3年人存活率与对照组无显著差异 ,而治疗组移植肾存活率明显高于对照组(P <0 0 5 )。治疗组急性排斥反应发生率 (18 6 % )比对照组 (2 8 7% )低 ,P <0 0 5 ,且首次急性排斥反应发生时间明显延长 ,对MP冲击治疗效果好。治疗组CMV感染的发生率 (33 3% )高于对照组 ,P <0 0 5。结论 :肾移植术后预防性使用抗CD3单克隆抗体对提高移植肾存活率 ,降低急性排斥反应发生率有较好的作用 ;用药期间应注意预防及治疗CMV感染。     

Human herpesviruses 6 and 7 as potential pathogens after liver transplant: prospective comparison with the effect of cytomegalovirus.

Because cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important opportunistic infection after liver transplant, we conducted a prospective study to see if the same applied to human herpesviruses (HHV)-6 and -7. We used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods optimised to detect active, not latent, infection and studied patients not receiving antiviral prophylaxis for CMV. Post-transplant, 536 blood samples were tested by PCR (median 7; range 4-50). Active infection with CMV was detected in 28/60 (47%), HHV-6 in 19/60 (32%), and HHV-7 in 29/60 (48%) of patients. The PCR-positive samples were tested by quantitative-competitive PCR to measure the virus load of each betaherpesvirus. The median peak virus load for CMV was significantly greater than that for HHV-6 or HHV-7. Detailed clinicopathological analyses for the whole population showed that CMV and HHV-6 were each significantly associated with biopsy-proven graft rejection. Individual case histories suggested that HHV-6 and HHV-7 may be the cause of some episodes of hepatitis and pyrexia. It is concluded that HHV-6 is a previously unrecognized contributor to the morbidity of liver transplantation, that HHV-7 may also be important and that both viruses should be included in the differential diagnosis of graft dysfunction.     

The impact of prophylactic antiviral agents and statin administration on graft longevity in kidney allograft recipients

Context: In an earlier study, we compared the duration of kidney graft survival between two groups of recipients; one on triple (cyclosporine, prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil) and the other on quadruple (cyclosporine, prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil, and sirolimus) immunosuppressive therapy.

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of antiviral and statin therapy on graft longevity.

Materials and methods: One hundred five kidney allograft recipients were preoperatively assessed for serological markers of infection with various viral agents. All patients were on a prophylactic antiviral regimen of acyclovir and gancyclovir. Seventeen patients were on a statin. Patients were monitored for viral infections and graft rejection or loss for period of 3 years posttransplantation.

Results: We detected a high preoperative prevalence rate of IgG immunoglobulins versus the latency-establishing Herpesviridae viruses. Two patients who were preoperatively IgG positive for CMV had cytomegalovirus disease after transplantation. One patient who was preoperatively IgG positive for VZV had shingles after the surgery. No other confirmed viral infections were reported. Thirteen of 88 patients (14.77%) whose treatment regimen did not include a statin suffered a rejection episode or lost the graft whereas 1 of 17 patients (5.88%) on a statin had a rejection episode.

Conclusions: The low rate of viral infections observed in our study population supports the utility of prophylactic administration of antiviral agents to transplant recipients. However, statins seem to have a protective effect on graft longevity (odds ratio [OR]?=?0.361, 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?0.044–2.957).     

Update on post-liver transplantation infections, malignancies, and surgical complications

Complications of liver transplantation are not limited to acute and chronic rejection, and recurrence of original disease, but include surgical complications, most commonly hepatic artery occlusion, infections, and development of de novo malignancies. In the early posttransplantation period, procurement/preservation injury, non-immunologic injury to the graft during harvesting and implantation, is manifested by centrilobular hepatocyte pallor and cholestasis but rarely leads to significant graft dysfunction. Ischemic complications, such as hepatic artery thrombosis, are more serious complications and may lead to early graft loss or biliary stricture. Infectious complications generally occur in the mid-to-late period after transplantation; cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a common pathogen. Human herpes 6 virus infection has been implicated in allograft dysfunction, but is usually seen in the setting of co-infection with CMV. De novo malignancies are emerging as a significant cause of mortality after liver transplantation; risk is cumulative, and increases with time posttransplantation. Development of such malignancies in the setting of solid organ transplantation is multifactorial, and is related to individual and regional predispositions to malignancy, pre-transplantation disease states, recipient viral status, and use and intensity of immunosuppression regimens.     

A comparative randomised study of valacyclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients

An open, prospective, randomised study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of valacyclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. Eighty-three renal transplant recipients were assigned randomly to receive valacyclovir (n=43) or oral ganciclovir (n=40) for the first 3 months after transplantation. Both groups were similar in terms of demographics, primary renal disease, graft source, HLA matching, immunosuppressive therapy and donor-recipient CMV antibody status. CMV infection was diagnosed by detection of virus DNA in plasma with the Amplicor CMV Test. CMV disease was observed in only one patient belonging to the ganciclovir group, who developed enterocolitis 6 months post-transplantation. No difference was observed between the two treatment groups with respect to detection of CMV DNA, virus infections other than CMV, acute rejection episodes, and serum creatinine levels at 3 and 6 months following transplantation. An increased number of bacterial infections was noted in the ganciclovir group (p 0.003). No adverse reactions with either treatment were reported. The estimated cost of valacyclovir treatment was 20% higher than that of ganciclovir treatment. Overall, both valacyclovir and oral ganciclovir were found to be effective and safe for CMV prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. Decisions regarding prophylactic regimens should include additional criteria, such as cost or possible development of resistance.     

Quantification of DNA in plasma by an automated real-time PCR assay (cytomegalovirus PCR kit) for surveillance of active cytomegalovirus infection and guidance of preemptive therapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

The performance of a plasma real-time PCR (cytomegalovirus [CMV] PCR kit; Abbott Diagnostics) was compared with that of the antigenemia assay for the surveillance of active CMV infection in 42 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) recipients. A total of 1,156 samples were analyzed by the two assays. Concordance between the two assays was 82.2%. Plasma DNA levels correlated with the number of pp65-positive cells, particularly prior to the initiation of preemptive therapy. Fifty-seven episodes of active CMV infection were detected in 37 patients: 18 were defined solely by the PCR assay and four were defined on the basis of the antigenemia assay. Either a cutoff of 288 CMV DNA copies/ml or a 2.42-log₁₀ increase of DNAemia levels between two consecutive PCR positive samples was an optimal value to discriminate between patients requiring preemptive therapy and those not requiring therapy on the basis of the antigenemia results. The real-time PCR assay allowed an earlier diagnosis of active CMV infection and was a more reliable marker of successful clearance of CMV from the blood. Analysis of the kinetics of DNAemia levels at a median of 7 days posttreatment allowed the prediction of the response to CMV therapy. Two patients developed CMV colitis. The PCR assay tested positive both before the onset of symptoms and during the disease period. The plasma real-time PCR from Abbott is more suitable than the antigenemia assay for monitoring active CMV infection in Allo-SCT recipients and may be used for guiding preemptive therapy in this clinical setting.     

Frequent occult infection with Cytomegalovirus in cardiac transplant recipients despite antiviral prophylaxis

Despite antiviral prophylaxis, a high percentage (over 90%) of heart transplant patients experience active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, diagnosed by detection of viral DNA in peripheral blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes within the first few months posttransplantation. Viral DNA was detected in mononuclear cells prior to detection in granulocytes from CMV-seropositive recipients (R+) receiving a heart from a CMV-seropositive donor (D+). Based on assessment of systemic infection in leukocyte populations, both R+ subgroups (R+/D- and R+/D+) experienced a greater infection burden than the R-/D+ subgroup, which was aggressively treated because of a higher risk of acute CMV disease. Despite widespread systemic infection in all at-risk patient subgroups, CMV DNA was rarely (< 3% of patients) detected in transplanted heart biopsy specimens. The R+ patients more frequently exceeded the 75th percentile of the CMV DNA copy number distribution in leukocytes (110 copies/10(5) polymorphonuclear leukocytes) than the R-/D+ subgroup. Therefore, active systemic CMV infection involving leukocytes is common in heart transplant recipients receiving prophylaxis to reduce acute disease. Infection of the transplanted organ is rare, suggesting that chronic vascular disease attributed to CMV may be driven by the consequences of systemic infection.     

Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants

The main risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants (SCT) are recipient CMV seropositivity and acute graft-versus-host disease. Currently, two antiviral strategies, prophylactic or preemptive antiviral treatment, are used for prevention of CMV disease. Preemptive treatment is most favorable when short-term (14-day) treatment is applied. Several methods are available for monitoring of CMV reactivation. PCR-based CMV DNA detection assays are the most sensitive methods; however, the clinical benefit of this high sensitivity is unclear. Even more, there is lack of clarity whether PCR tests can better be performed with plasma, whole blood, or peripheral blood leukocyte samples. Recovery of a CMV-specific CD8(+) cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) response is necessary for preventing CMV reactivation and disease. Reconstitution of absolute CMV-specific CTL counts to values above 10 x 10(6) to 20 x 10(6) CTLs/liter is associated with protection from CMV disease. In the near future, preemptive therapy might be withheld in patients with CMV reactivation who are shown to have adequate CMV-specific cytotoxic T-cell levels. Antiviral therapy with (val)acyclovir has been studied only as prophylactic treatment for prevention of CMV infection. High-dose oral valacyclovir is more effective than acyclovir when used in addition to preemptive treatment of CMV reactivation with ganciclovir or foscarnet. Three antiviral drugs have been tested for preemptive therapy of CMV reactivation and/or treatment of CMV disease. Although intravenous ganciclovir is considered the drug of choice, foscarnet has similar efficacy and less toxicity, especially hematologic toxicity. Cidofovir has not been tested extensively, but so far the results are disappointing. Oral valganciclovir for preemptive treatment of SCT recipients is currently being studied. In addition to antiviral therapy, adoptive immunotherapy with CMV-specific cytotoxic T cells as prophylactic or preemptive therapy is a very elegant strategy; however, generation of these cells is expensive and time-consuming, and therefore the therapy is not available at every transplantation center. Magnetic selection of CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells from peripheral blood by using HLA class I-peptide tetramers may be very promising, making this strategy more accessible.     

Mycophenolate Mofetil

Mycophenolate mofetil is the morpholinoethyl ester prodrug of mycophenolic acid, an uncompetitive reversible inhibitor of the rate-limiting enzyme in de novo purine synthesis, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase. As an antimetabolite immunosuppressant, mycophenolate mofetil has been evaluated for the prevention and treatment of acute rejection of a variety of solid organ allografts. It is generally added to post-transplant therapy regimens in place of azathioprine, and in conjunction with cyclosporin and corticosteroids. In large, randomised controlled trials in renal and cardiac transplant recipients, mycophenolate mofetil has shown significant efficacy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection compared with azathioprine in the first year after transplantation. Whereas patient and graft survival rates are improved with mycophenolate mofetil in cardiac transplantation, significant benefits for patient or graft survival have not been demonstrated in clinical trials in renal transplant patients. Mycophenolate mofetil does, however, appear to reduce the incidence of renal graft loss due to rejection. Mycophenolate mofetil has been shown to reverse ongoing acute rejection episodes in heart, kidney and liver transplant patients, and to improve graft function when used to treat chronic lung or heart graft vasculopathy. The efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppression appears to allow sparing of other immunosuppressive agents, particularly cyclosporin and corticosteroids, in selected patients. The main adverse effects associated with oral mycophenolate mofetil are GI events, haematological toxicity (especially leucocytopenia) and an increased incidence of some types of infections relative to placebo. Lower dosages (2 g/day) are generally better tolerated than higher dosages (3 g/day). Although mycophenolate mofetil carries a high acquisition cost relative to azathioprine, when other direct costs of treatment of organ transplant patients are considered, it appears to be a cost-effective alternative, at least during the first post-transplant year. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits in terms of a reduction in the morbidity associated with acute organ allograft rejection indicate that mycophenolate mofetil should be considered as part of a primary therapy regimen in renal and cardiac transplant recipients, and as a treatment for reversal of acute refractory rejection in these patients. Further study is required to confirm its benefits in the transplantation of other solid organs.