Advantages of a new technique of neck dissection using an ultrasonic scalpel.

The aim of the study was to see whether a new technique of a neck dissection applying an ultrasonic activated (harmonic) scalpel would improve patient recovery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized study was undertaken on 40 supraomohyoid neck dissections performed using a harmonic scalpel (20 pts) or electrocoagulation (20 pts). The evaluation included: operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative seroma formation and pattern of wound healing. RESULTS: The operative time (mean+/-SD) using a harmonic scalpel was significantly shorter (52+/-10 min vs. 86+/-22 min; p相似文献   

Use of knotless barbed sutures for closure of intraoral incisions for maxillofacial trauma: a randomised controlled trial

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of knotless barbed sutures in intraoral wound closure for maxillofacial trauma in comparison with conventional (vicryl) sutures. This was a randomised controlled clinical trial involving 40 patients with isolated mandibular angle fractures who required intraoral incisions for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The sample was randomised into the study group (20 patients) and control group (20 patients). Following fracture fixation by a standardised surgical protocol, the wound closure was done with bidirectional knotless barbed suture and vicryl for the study and control groups, respectively. The wounds were closed in layers (periosteum and mucosa). All operations were performed by a single surgeon. Outcome parameters measured were intraoperative wound closure time and wound healing using ‘Landry’s wound healing index’ on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days. Statistically significant difference in suturing time was noted between the study and control group (p value <0.001). The study group demonstrated a mean (SD) suturing time of 9.46 (2.01) minutes, compared with the 17.61 (2.57) minutes in the control group. Wound healing was found to be better and statistically significant in the study group than the control group (p value<0.001). Knotless barbed suture is a promising alternative to vicryl for intraoral wound closure.     

Diode laser surgery versus electrocautery in the treatment of inflammatory fibrous hyperplasia: a randomized double-blind clinical trial

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of diode laser and electrocautery techniques for inflammatory fibrous hyperplasia (IFH) removal.

Materials and methods

In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, 40 individuals were randomly allocated to two groups: group 1 (G1) consisted of 20 individuals assigned to treatment with diode laser and group 2 (G2) consisted of 20 individuals assigned to treatment with electrocautery. The following transoperative parameters were evaluated: bleeding, temperature, and surgical technique parameters (energy deposited on tissue, flow rate, and time of incision). The postoperative parameters evaluated were as follows: pain, functional alterations (chewing, speaking), analgesic medication intake, swelling, healing of the wound area, and patient satisfaction.

Results

Among the 40 individuals included in the study, four (two in G1 and two in G2) did not complete the entire follow-up. Therefore, 36 individuals (18 in G1 and 18 in G2) participated. Participants in G1 and in G2 had similar demographic characteristics. No difference regarding the trans- or postoperative parameters evaluated was observed between G1 and G2 (p > 0.05). Also, no difference regarding the time for healing was observed between groups.

Conclusions

Diode laser seems to be as effective and safe as electrocautery when applied under similar conditions for IFH removal.

Clinical relevance

IFH corresponds to 65% of the lesions observed in denture wearers. This study shows that under similar conditions diode laser is as effective and safe as electrocautery for removal of IFH.

     

High-level laser therapy versus scalpel surgery in the treatment of oral lichen planus: a randomized control trial

Objective

To compare the clinical effectiveness of various types of high-level laser therapy (HLLT) toward scalpel excision for the surgical treatment of erosive oral lichen planus (OLP).

Materials and methods

The total number of 128 individuals were enrolled in the study. The 35 did not meet the inclusion criteria due to malignancy signs and presence of diabetes mellitus. In total, 8 were lost to follow-up, and 10 were excluded from the analysis, due to analgesics intake. This way 75 patients with the erosive form of OLP were analyzed in three intervention groups (Er:YAG, n = 19; Nd:YAG, n = 15; Er:YAG + Nd:YAG combination, n = 20) and one control group with scalpel excision (n = 21). The therapy effectiveness has been assessed based on the comparison of salivary interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6 and interferon (IFN)-γ preoperative levels to 14, 30 days, and 2 years postoperation, as well as pain level and time of epithelization.

Results

All HLLT groups demonstrated a significantly (p > 0.05) higher IL-1β, IL-6, IFNγ and pain level reduction and quicker epithelization toward the control group on the 30th day, except Nd:YAG in case of IFNγ level. The highest IL-1β, IFNγ and pain level reduction and quicker epithelization on the 30th day was observed in Er:YAG group, followed by Er:YAG + Nd:YAG combination, Nd:YAG respectively. However no significant difference was observed between the HLLT groups with regard to IL-6 level reduction. After a 2-year follow-up, no significant difference was observed between all study groups with regard to all variables.

Conclusion

HLLT yields a superior clinical outcome compared to the scalpel excision for the surgical treatment of oral lichen planus, whereby the Er:YAG has been proposed as the most effective laser type at the end of the first postoperative month.

Clinical relevance

For the surgical treatment of erosive OLP the Er:YAG laser may be a preferable treatment option compared to Nd:YAG and scalpel surgery.

Trial registration

The present trial was registered retrospectively in the German Clinical Trials Register, as a member of WHO international clinical trials registry platform, on the 18.03.2020 with the following number: DRKS00020986

     

Prognostic value of elective neck dissection in adenoid cystic carcinoma of head and neck: a meta-analysis: A call for randomized trials and international consensus

Adenoid cystic carcinoma of head and neck (AdCCHN) is an uncommon salivary gland cancer characterized for infrequent neck metastases, and high rate of local and distant recurrence. The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyse the significance of elective neck dissection (END) in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients with AdCCHN. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis was performed. Endpoint assessed by this meta-analysis included 5-year OS (death from any cause). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I² statistic. A pooled odds ratio (OR) was reported with 95% confidence interval (CI). There were 1934 patients in the END arm and 3083 in the observation group. The pooled OR, calculated for END vs. observation, was 0.94. Patients receiving END had similar risk for death compared to observation cohort (P = 0.76). No significant difference in final outcome after patient stratification based on T stage was identified (OR for T1/T2 1.27, P = 0.39; OR for T3/T4 0.95, P = 0.90). Observation for cN0 neck is a reasonable option in AdCCHN. These findings suggest the need for prospective trials on indications and extent of END in AdCCHN.     

Photobiomodulation with low-level laser therapy reduces oral mucositis caused by head and neck radio-chemotherapy: prospective randomized controlled trial

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of photobiomodulation with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as a preventive and therapeutic procedure for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal mucositis caused by radio-chemotherapy in patients diagnosed with oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). An experimental, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study was conducted involving patients diagnosed with oral SCC undergoing oncological treatment. The variables analyzed included grade, appearance, and remission of mucositis. A final sample of 26 patients was included: 11 (42.3%) in the study group and 15 (57.7%) in the control group; their average age was 60.89 ± 9.99 years. Statistically significant differences between the groups were observed from week 5 of oncological treatment; 72.7% of the laser group showed normal mucosa (mucositis grade 0), while in the control group, 20.0% showed grade 0 mucositis and 40.0% showed grade 2 mucositis (P < 0.01). No statistically significant difference between the groups was found regarding the application or use of medication throughout the study period (P > 0.05). The tolerance evaluation did not show any statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the occurrence of side effects or adverse events during the trial (P > 0.05). Photobiomodulation with LLLT reduces the incidence and severity of mucositis in patients treated with radiotherapy ± chemotherapy.     

Supraomohyoid neck dissection and modified radical neck dissection for clinically node-negative oral squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study of prognosis,complications and quality of life

BackgroundTo assess the prognosis and morbidity between supraomohyoid neck dissection (SOND) and modified radical neck dissection (MRND) for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in patients with a clinically node-negative neck (cN0).Patients and methodsThis prospective randomized study began in June 1999, and patient accrual concluded in May 2010. The cN0 neck was confirmed on clinical palpation by senior doctors. Ultimately, there were 322 patients recruited into the study.ResultsPatient demographics were well balanced between the two groups. There were 10 patients in the SOND group and 21 patients in the MRND group who developed nodal recurrence without associated local recurrence or distant metastasis. The 3-year neck control rate (NCR) rate was 92.6% for the SOND group and 87.5% for the MRND group (in favor of SOND, P = 0.108). There was no significant difference between the SOND group and the MRND group in the 3-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate (79.0% vs. 76.9%, P = 0.659). Importantly, there were significantly fewer complications in the SOND group compared with the MRND group (13.0% vs. 21.9%, P = 0.040). The disease-free survivors in the SOND group also reported better pain relief (P = 0.013) and shoulder function (P < 0.001) than those in the MRND group one year after treatment.ConclusionsWe recommend SOND as a priority treatment for cN0 OSCC patients.     

Transmandibular implant versus intramobile cylinder implants: a randomized, prospective clinical trial

A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare two different implant treatment modalities for edentulous patients with severely resorbed mandibles. In one modality (the IMZ^® group), two intramobile cylinder implants were placed, connected by a Dolder bar and provided with an overdenture, and in the other (the TMI group), a transmandibular implant with a triple bar and cantilever extensions was placed, likewise provided with an overdenture. The conditions of the overdentures, the peri-implant tissues, and the implants were evaluated. Orthopantomograms were taken for radiologic evaluation. An overal complication scale which took account of all aspects was devised to compare the results. The follow-up period was 2–4 years, with a mean follow-up of 3 years. The condition of dentures and oral hygiene aspects were comparable for both groups. The complication rate in the TMI group was significantly higher than that in the IMZ group. The scores on the complication scale resulted in a significant difference between the TMI and the IMZ groups (Wilcoxon, P=0.0044).     

Single implants with different neck designs in the aesthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial

Objectives: To compare single implants in the aesthetic zone with different neck designs for marginal bone‐level changes and clinical outcome measures. Materials and methods: Ninety‐three patients with a missing anterior tooth in the maxilla were randomly assigned to be treated with an implant with a 1.5 mm smooth neck (“smooth group”), a moderately rough neck with grooves (“rough group”) or a scalloped moderately rough neck with grooves (“scalloped‐group”). Implants were installed in healed sites and were loaded after 3 months. Follow‐up visits were conducted at 6 and 18 months after implant placement. Results: The scalloped group showed significantly more radiographic bone loss from implant placement to 18 months (2.01 ± 0.77 mm) compared with the smooth group (1.19 ± 0.82 mm) and rough group (0.9 ± 0.57 mm). Furthermore the scalloped group showed significantly deeper pocket depths and a higher bleeding score. There were no between‐group differences in soft tissue levels. Survival rates were 97% for the smooth group and 100% for the rough and scalloped groups (P>0.05). No significant differences in outcome were found between the smooth group and rough group. Conclusion: For anterior tooth replacements, implants with a scalloped neck showed more marginal bone loss and less favourable clinical outcome compared with implants with a 1.5 mm smooth neck or implants with a rough neck. To cite this article:
den Hartog L, Meijer HJA, Stegenga B, Tymstra N, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Single implants with different neck designs in the aesthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 1289–1297.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02109.x     

Prevention of osteoradionecrosis: a randomized prospective clinical trial of hyperbaric oxygen versus penicillin

A prospective randomized trial comparing hyperbaric oxygen and systemic antibiotics in the prevention of osteoradionecrosis was presented. The results indicated, in a high-risk population who required tooth removal in irradiated mandibles, that up-front hyperbaric oxygen produced an incidence of osteoradionecrosis of 5.4% as compared with the antibiotic group of 29.9% (P = .005). Hyperbaric oxygen should be considered a prophylactic measure when post-irradiation dental care involving trauma to tissue is necessary.     

Periodontal healing after non-surgical therapy with a new ultrasonic device: a randomized controlled clinical trial

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and microbiological healing outcomes following non-surgical periodontal therapy using the new Vector ultrasonic system versus scaling and root planing (S/RP) with Gracey curettes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study comprised 20 chronic periodontitis patients. Using a split-mouth design, both treatment modalities were randomly applied to one quadrant of the upper and the lower jaws each. Clinical and microbiological parameters were assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 6 months after treatment. Furthermore, post-operative hypersensitivity was assessed. The Wilcoxon signed rank test (alpha=0.05) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Both therapies provided statistically significant clinical and microbiological improvements of periodontal conditions after 4 weeks and 6 months. Hypersensitive teeth were found only 4 weeks after S/RP. Besides a significantly better bleeding on probing reduction in deep S/RP sites, no other clinical and microbiological parameters revealed significant differences between the sites treated with the Vector system or S/RP. CONCLUSION: Both the Vector system and S/RP provided favourable periodontal healing results, although in deep pockets S/RP appeared to achieve a better resolution of inflammation.     

Hand instrumentation versus ultrasonic debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized clinical and microbiological trial

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of scaling and root planing (SRP) with the use of hand instruments to that of non-surgical treatment with the use of an ultrasonic device, using clinical and microbiological criteria.
Material and Methods: Thirty-three patients with chronic periodontitis participated in this randomized-controlled clinical trial divided into two groups. Patients in the control group received SRP with hand instruments, whereas patients in the test group received ultrasonic debridement (UD). Clinical recordings concerning probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, plaque index and gingival bleeding index were performed at baseline, 3 and 6 months after baseline. Subgingival samples were analysed using the "checkerboard" DNA–DNA hybridization technique for Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythia and Treponema denticola .
Results: Both treatments resulted in a significant improvement in all clinical recordings. Three months after treatment, a numerical decrease was observed for P. gingivalis, T. forsythia and T. denticola in both groups, which was statistically significant only for P. gingivalis ( p <0.05). Inter-group differences were observed at 6 months for T. forsythia and T. denticola ( p <0.05), favouring SRP.
Conclusions: Both treatment modalities provided comparable clinical results in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.     

Comparison between the use of an ultrasonic tip and a microhead handpiece in periradicular surgery: a prospective randomised trial

Innovations in periradicular surgery for failed treatment of orthograde root canal disease have been well-documented. We know of no prospective studies that have compared success rates of conventional methods with these presumed advances. In this prospective randomised trial we compare the use of an ultrasonic retrotip with a microhead bur in the preparation of a retrograde cavity. Outcome was estimated clinically by estimation of pain, swelling, and sinus, and radiographically by looking at infill of bone and retrograde root filling 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Both methods used other surgical techniques including microinstruments to place the retrograde root filling. The success rate of the ultrasonic method was higher (all patients, n=26) than that of the microhead method (n=19 of 21). A larger study with longer follow up is required to consolidate this evidence.     

Clinical evaluation of chlorhexidine and essential oils for adjunctive effects in ultrasonic instrumentation of furcation involvements: a randomized controlled clinical trial

To cite this article:
Int J Dent Hygiene 10 , 2012; 113–117
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601‐5037.2011.00538.x Yilmaz HG, Bayindir H. Clinical evaluation of chlorhexidine and essential oils for adjunctive effects in ultrasonic instrumentation of furcation involvements: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Abstract: Background: The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of subgingival ultrasonic mechanical instrumentation (UMI) irrigated with essential oils (EOs) and chlorhexidine (CHX) at the furcation involvements (FI). Methods: Forty‐five patients (244 FI) who presented with Class II FI were recruited to the study. Patients were randomly assigned to CHX (UMI irrigated with 0.2% CHX), EO (UMI irrigated with EOs) or control (UMI irrigated with distilled water) groups. All treatments were performed in one session. For all groups, plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), position of gingival margin (PGM), pocket depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment level (CAL) and horizontal attachment level (HAL) scores were recorded at baseline and 1 and 3 months after therapy. Results: In all groups, there were significant reductions in PI, GI, PD and BOP, increase in PGM scores and gain in CAL and HAL scores, at 1 and 3 months compared to baseline. Except in BOP scores, there were no significance differences among the groups at any time point. At 1 and 3 months, there were significant reductions in the BOP scores of the EO group compared with the CHX and control groups. Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, the use of EOs as a cooling liquid of UMI may promote slight adjunctive effects at FI compared to CHX and water.     

Flap extension attained by vertical and periosteal-releasing incisions: a prospective cohort study

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of vertical and periosteal‐releasing incisions (PRI) on the extension of the buccal flap in a trapezoidal flap design. Material and methods: Thirty patients scheduled for implant surgery accompanied by bone augmentation were recruited. The amount of flap extension pulled with a minimal tension of 5 g using a dynamometer was measured before and after the first and the second vertical incisions (VI) and PRI. The results were compared based on gender, surgical site and operator's experience. Results: The first VI extended flap length by 1.1 ± 0.6 mm, 113.4% more compared with the original flap length. The second VI increased flap length by 1.9 ± 1 mm (124.2%), and the PRI significantly extended flap length by 5.5 ± 1.5 mm (171.3%) (P<0.001). The length of the first and the second VI and the amount of flap extension by each incision were compared, and there were no statistically significant differences between gender, surgical site (maxilla vs. mandible) and operator's experience (faculty vs. residents). Conclusion: Vertical and PRI in a trapezoidal flap design can be successfully utilized to attain tension‐free primary closure during implant or periodontal surgeries. However, the PRI appears to be the only determinant key factor that can significantly extend the length of the flaps, while host‐ and operator‐related factors might not have any significant effect on such flap extension. To cite this article:
Park JC, Kim CS, Choi SH, Cho KS, Chai JK, Jung UW. Flap extension attained by vertical and periosteal‐releasing incisions: a prospective cohort study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012; 993–998
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02244.x