Quantification of subendocardial and subepicardial blood flow using 15O-labeled water and PET: experimental validation.

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of quantifying subendocardial and subepicardial myocardial blood flow (MBF) and the relative coronary flow reserves (CFR) using (15)O-labeled water (H(2)(15)O) and 3-dimensional-only PET. METHODS: Eight pigs were scanned with H(2)(15)O and (15)O-labeled carbon monoxide (C(15)O) after partially occluding the circumflex (n = 3) or the left anterior descending (n = 5) coronary artery, both at rest and during hyperemia induced by intravenous dipyridamole. Radioactive microspheres were injected during each of the H(2)(15)O scans. RESULTS: In a total of 256 paired measurements of MBF, ranging from 0.30 to 4.46 mL.g(-1).min(-1), microsphere and PET MBF were fairly well correlated. The mean difference between the 2 methods was -0.01 +/- 0.52 mL.g(-1).min(-1) with 95% of the differences lying between the limits of agreement of -1.02 and 1.01 mL.g(-1).min(-1). CFR was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in the ischemic subendocardium (PET = 1.12 +/- 0.45; microspheres = 1.09 +/- 0.50; P = 0.86) and subepicardium (PET = 1.2 +/- 0.35; microspheres = 1.32 +/- 0.5; P = 0.39) in comparison with remote subendocardium (PET = 1.7 +/- 0.62; microspheres = 1.64 +/- 0.61; P = 0.68) and subepicardium (PET = 1.79 +/- 0.73; microspheres = 2.19 +/- 0.86; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Dynamic measurements using H(2)(15)O and a 3-dimensional-only PET tomograph allow regional estimates of the transmural distribution of MBF over a wide flow range, although transmural flow differences were underestimated because of the partial-volume effect. PET subendocardial and subepicardial CFR were in good agreement with the microsphere values.     

Global myocardial blood flow and global flow reserve measurements by MRI and PET are comparable

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) measurements have been widely used in assessing the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis because they are more sensitive in predicting major cardiac events than angiographically detected reductions of coronary arteries. Myocardial blood flow can be determined by measuring coronary sinus (CS) flow with velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging (VEC-MRI). The purpose of this study was to compare global myocardial blood flow (MBF) and CFR measured using VEC-MRI with MBF and CFR measured using positron emission tomography (PET). We measured MBF at baseline and after dipyridamole-induced hyperemia in 12 male volunteers with VEC-MRI and PET. With VEC-MRI, MBF was 0.64 +/- 0.09 (ml/min/g) at baseline and 1.59 +/- 0.79 (ml/min/g) at hyperemia, which yielded an average CFR of 2.51 +/- 1.29. With PET, MBF was 0.65 +/- 0.20 (ml/min/g) at baseline and 1.78 +/- 0.72 (ml/min/g) at hyperemia, which yielded an average CFR of 2.79 +/- 0.97. The correlation of MBFs between these two methods was good (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). The CFRs measured by MRI correlated well with those measured using PET (r = 0.76, P < 0.004). These results suggest that MRI is a useful and accurate method to measure global MBF and CFR. Therefore, it would be suitable for studying risk factor modifications of vascular function at an early stage in healthy volunteers.     

Bicycle exercise stress in PET for assessment of coronary flow reserve: repeatability and comparison with adenosine stress.

PET allows absolute measurements of myocardial blood flow (MBF). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility and repeatability of supine bicycle exercise stress, compared with standard adenosine stress, in PET. METHODS: In 11 healthy volunteers, MBF was assessed at rest, during adenosine-induced (140 microg/kg/min over 7 min) hyperemia, and immediately after supine bicycle exercise (mean workload, 130 W, which is 70% of the predicted value) using PET and (15)O-H(2)O. The assessment was then repeated after 20 min. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was calculated as hyperemic/resting MBF for adenosine stress and exercise stress. Repeatability was evaluated according to the method of Bland and Altman. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the paired resting MBF (1.22 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.26 +/- 0.21 mL/min/g; mean difference, 3% +/- 11%) and the hyperemic MBF with adenosine stress (5.13 +/- 0.74 vs. 4.97 +/- 1.05; mean difference, -4% +/- 14%) or exercise stress (2.35 +/- 0.66 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.61; mean difference, -4% +/- 19%). CFR was reproducible with adenosine stress (4.23 +/- 0.62 vs. 4.05 +/- 1.06, P = not statistically significant; mean difference, -5% +/- 19%) and exercise stress (1.91 +/- 0.46 vs. 1.80 +/- 0.44, P = not statistically significant; mean difference, -5% +/- 15%). Repeatability coefficients for MBF were 0.26 (rest), 1.34 (adenosine stress), and 0.82 (exercise stress) mL/min/g. CONCLUSION: Assessment of CFR with (15)O-H(2)O and PET using bicycle exercise in the PET scanner is feasible and at least as repeatable as using adenosine stress.     

Beta-adrenergic blockade and myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease: differential effects in stenotic versus remote myocardial segments.

Beta-adrenergic blocking agents are widely used in coronary artery disease (CAD), although their impact on myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) remains unclear. We studied the effect of long-term beta-blocker treatment (carvedilol or metoprolol) on coronary microcirculation in CAD patients using PET. METHODS: Regional and global resting and adenosine-induced hyperemic MBF and CFR were measured with 13N-ammonia and PET in 36 CAD patients before and after 12 wk of oral therapy with either carvedilol, 50 mg/d, or metoprolol, 100 mg/d. RESULTS: Beta-blockade decreased global resting MBF in proportion to cardiac work (from 0.86 +/- 0.20 to 0.77 +/- 0.14 mL/min/g, P < 0.05) without affecting global hyperemic flow. Hyperemic MBF was significantly lower in stenosis-dependent segments than in remote segments (1.76 +/- 0.64 vs. 2.04 +/- 0.67 mL/min/g, P < 0.05) at baseline but was comparable in both after treatment (2.02 +/- 0.68 vs. 1.90 +/- 0.78 mL/min/g, P = not statistically significant [NS]), resulting in a significant CFR increase in stenotic segments (+15%, P < 0.05) but not in remote segments (+9%, P = NS). CONCLUSION: The beneficial effect of beta-adrenergic blockade can be explained by the reduction in oxygen consumption (= decreased demand) but also by a modest improvement in vasodilator capacity (= increased supply). The improvement in CFR is found predominantly in stenosis-dependent rather than remote segments.     

Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 15O-labeled water and PET.

PET with 15O-labeled water allows noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) at baseline and during pharmacologically induced hyperemia to assess the coronary vasodilator reserve (CVR = hyperemic/baseline MBF). Despite widespread use of PET, its reproducibility during one study session has not been tested. Intravenous adenosine (Ado), a powerful coronary vasodilator with a very short decay time, is commonly used for the induction of hyperemia. However, it is not known whether Ado can induce tachyphylaxis after short-term repetitive administration. In this study, we aimed to test the reproducibility of PET assessment of CVR during Ado-induced hyperemia. METHODS: In 21 healthy volunteer men, baseline and Ado MBF were measured twice using PET with 15O-labeled water to obtain two CVR assessments within 1 h. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two baselines (0.89 +/- 0.14 versus 0.99 +/- 0.15 mL/min/g, mean difference 13% +/- 11%) or between the two hyperemic MBFs (3.51 +/- 0.45 versus 3.83 +/- 0.49 mL/min/g, mean difference 10% +/- 14%), resulting in comparable values of CVR (4.05 +/- 0.75 versus 3.93 +/- 0.72, mean difference 2% +/- 15%). The repeatability coefficient for MBF was 0.17 mL/min/g at baseline and 0.94 mL/min/g during hyperemia. The repeatability coefficient of the rate pressure product (RPP) was lower at baseline (1,304 mm Hg x beat/min) than during hyperemia (3,448 mm Hg x beat/min). CONCLUSION: Repeated measurements of MBF and CVR during the same study session were not significantly different, demonstrating the validity of the technique. The larger variability of hyperemic flow, as indicated by the larger repeatability coefficient, was paralleled by a greater variability of the RPP. This could mean that the greater variability of MBF during stress is more likely due to a variable response to Ado rather than to a measurement error.     

Validation of myocardial perfusion reserve measurements using regularized factor images of H(2)(15)O dynamic PET scans.

The use of H(2)(15)O PET scans for the measurement of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) has been validated in both animal models and humans. Nevertheless, this protocol requires cumbersome acquisitions such as C(15)O inhalation or (18)F-FDG injection to obtain images suitable for determining myocardial regions of interest. Regularized factor analysis is an alternative method proposed to define myocardial contours directly from H(2)(15)O studies without any C(15)O or FDG scan. The study validates this method by comparing the MPR obtained by the regularized factor analysis with the coronary flow reserve (CFR) obtained by intracoronary Doppler as well as with the MPR obtained by an FDG acquisition. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers and 10 patients with ischemic cardiopathy or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy were investigated. The CFR of patients was measured sonographically using a Doppler catheter tip placed into the proximal left anterior descending artery. The mean velocity was recorded at baseline and after dipyridamole administration. All subjects underwent PET imaging, including 2 H(2)(15)O myocardial perfusion studies at baseline and after dipyridamole infusion, followed by an FDG acquisition. Dynamic H(2)(15)O scans were processed by regularized factor analysis. Left ventricular cavity and anteroseptal myocardial regions of interest were drawn independently on regularized factor images and on FDG images. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and MPR were estimated by fitting the H(2)(15)O time-activity curves with a compartmental model. RESULTS: In patients, no significant difference was observed among the 3 methods of measurement-Doppler CFR, 1.73 +/- 0.57; regularized factor analysis MPR, 1.71 +/- 0.68; FDG MPR, 1.83 +/- 0.49-using a Friedman 2-way ANOVA by ranks. MPR measured with the regularized factor images correlated significantly with CFR (y = 1.17x - 0.30; r = 0.97). In the global population, the regularized factor analysis MPR and FDG MPR correlated strongly (y = 0.99x; r = 0.93). Interoperator repeatability on regularized factor images was 0.126 mL/min/g for rest MBF, 0.38 mL/min/g for stress MBF, and 0.34 for MPR (19% of mean MPR). CONCLUSION: Regularized factor analysis provides well-defined myocardial images from H(2)(15)O dynamic scans, permitting an accurate and simple measurement of MPR. The method reduces exposure to radiation and examination time and lowers the cost of MPR protocols using a PET scanner.     

Reproducibility of measurements of regional myocardial blood flow in a model of coronary artery disease: Comparison of H215O and 13NH3 PET techniques.

PET absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) with H(2)15O and 13NH3 are widely used in clinical and research settings. However, their reproducibility with a 16-myocardial segment model has not been examined in chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). We examined the short-term reproducibility of PET H(2)15O MBF and PET 13NH3 MBF in an animal model of chronic CAD. METHODS: Twelve swine (mean weight +/- SD, 38 +/- 5 kg) underwent percutaneous placement of a copper stent in the mid circumflex coronary artery, resulting in an intense inflammatory fibrotic reaction with luminal stenosis at 4 wk. Each animal underwent repeated resting MBF measurements by PET H(2)15O and PET 13NH3. Attenuation-corrected images were analyzed using commercial software to yield absolute MBF (mL/min/g) in 16 myocardial segments. MBF was also normalized to the rate.pressure product (RPP). RESULTS: By Bland-Altman reproducibility plots, the mean difference was 0.01 +/- 0.18 mL/min/g and 0.01 +/- 0.11 mL/min/g, with confidence limits of +/-0.36 and +/-0.22 mL/min/g for uncorrected regional PET H(2)15O MBF and for uncorrected regional PET 13NH3 MBF, respectively. The repeatability coefficient ranged from 0.09 to 0.43 mL/min/g for H(2)15O and from 0.09 to 0.18 mL/min/g for 13NH3 regional MBF. RPP correction did not improve reproducibility for either PET H(2)15O or PET 13NH3 MBF. The mean difference in PET H(2)15O MBF was 0.03 +/- 0.14 mL/min/g and 0.02 +/- 0.19 mL/min/g for infarcted and remote regions, respectively, and in PET 13NH3 MBF was 0.03 +/- 0.11 mL/min/g and 0.00 +/- 0.09 mL/min/g for infarcted and remote regions, respectively. CONCLUSION: PET H(2)15O and PET 13NH3 resting MBF showed excellent reproducibility in a closed-chest animal model of chronic CAD. Resting PET 13NH3 MBF was more reproducible than resting PET H(2)15O MBF. A high level of reproducibility was maintained in areas of lower flow with infarction for both isotopes.     

Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow with H(2)(15)O and 3-dimensional PET: an experimental validation.

The purpose of this study was to assess a 3-dimensional (3D)-only PET scanner (ECAT EXACT3D) for its use in the absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) using H(2)(15)O. METHODS: Nine large white pigs were scanned with H(2)(15)O and C(15)O before and after partially occluding the circumflex (n = 4) or the left anterior descending (n = 5) coronary artery at rest and during hyperemia induced by intravenous dipyridamole. Radioactive microspheres labeled with either (57)Co or (46)Sc were injected during each of the H(2)(15)O scans, which allowed comparison between microsphere and PET measurements of regional MBF. PET analyses of 3D acquisition data were performed using filtered backprojection reconstruction and region-of-interest definition by factor and cluster analysis techniques and single-compartment model quantification. RESULTS: The Hanning filter applied in image reconstruction resulted in a left atrial blood volume recovery factor of 0.84 +/- 0.06. Differences between repeated measurements of recovery were small (mean, -0.8%; range, -6.6% to 3.6%). In 256 paired measurements of MBF ranging from 0.05 to 4.4 mL. g(- 1). min(-1), microsphere and PET measurements were fairly well correlated. The mean difference between the 2 methods was - 0.11 mL. g(-1). min(-1) and the limits of agreement (+2 SD) were -0.82 and 0.60 mL. g(-1). min(-1) (Bland-Altman plot). CONCLUSION: Dynamic measurements with H(2)(15)O using a 3D-only PET tomograph provide reliable and accurate measurements of absolute regional MBF over a wide flow range. The 3D acquisition technique can reduce the radiation dose to the subject while maintaining adequate counting statistics.     

Repeatability of cold pressor test-induced flow increase assessed with H(2)(15)O and PET.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of endothelium-related myocardial blood flow (MBF) responses to cold pressor testing (CPT) as assessed by PET. METHODS: In 10 age-matched control subjects (26.6 +/- 3.4 y) and 10 tobacco smokers (24.9 +/- 3.3 y) MBF was assessed at rest and after repeated CPT (CPT1 and CPT2, 40 min apart) using PET with H(2)(15)O. CPT was performed by a 2-min immersion of the subject's foot in ice water. MBF values were corrected for cardiac workload (rate.pressure product), and the repeatability of CPT-related MBF values was assessed according to Bland and Altman. RESULTS: Corrected MBF at CPT1 and CPT2 were comparable in control subjects (1.79 +/- 0.37 vs. 1.70 +/- 0.35 mL/min/g; P = not significant [NS]) and in smokers (1.97 +/- 0.42 vs. 1.80 +/- 0.41 mL/min/g; P = NS). Repeatability coefficients in control subjects and smokers were 0.46 mL/min/g (27% of the mean MBF) and 0.51 mL/min/g (27%), respectively. MBF increased significantly after CPT in both groups but tended to be lower in smokers (P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: PET measured MBF combined with CPT is a feasible and repeatable method for the evaluation of endothelium-related changes of MBF.     

Assessment of the long-term reproducibility of baseline and dobutamine-induced myocardial blood flow in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Although physical exercise is the preferred stimulus for cardiac stress testing, pharmacologic agents are useful in patients who are unable to exercise. Previous studies have demonstrated short-term repeatability of exercise and adenosine stress, but little data exist regarding dobutamine (Dob) stress or the long-term reproducibility of pharmacologic stressors in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. PET allows accurate, noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR). The aim of the study was to investigate the long-term reproducibility of Dob stress on MBF and CFR in CAD patients using PET. METHODS: Fifteen patients with chronic stable angina and angiographically proven CAD (>70% stenosis in at least 1 major coronary artery) underwent PET with (15)O-labeled water and Dob stress at baseline (time [t] = 0) and after 24 wk (t = 24). MBF at rest and MBF during Dob stress were calculated for the whole left ventricle, the region subtended by the most severe coronary artery stenosis (Isc), and remote myocardium subtended by arteries with minimal or no disease (Rem). Reproducibility was assessed using the Bland-Altman (BA) repeatability coefficient and was also expressed as a percentage of the mean value of the 2 measurements (%BA). RESULTS: Dob dose (30 +/- 11 vs. 031 +/- 11 microg/kg/min; P = not significant [ns]) and peak Dob rate.pressure product (20,738 +/- 3,947 vs. 20,047 +/- 3,455 mm Hg x beats/min; P = ns) were comparable at t = 0 and t = 24. There was no significant difference in resting or Dob MBF (mL/min/g) between t = 0 and t = 24 for the whole left ventricle (1.03 +/- 0.19 vs. 1.10 +/- 0.20 and 2.02 +/- 0.44 vs. 2.09 +/- 0.57; P = ns for both), Isc (1.05 +/- 0.24 vs. 1.10 +/- 0.26 and 1.79 +/- 0.53 vs. 1.84 +/- 0.62; P = ns for both), or Rem (1.03 +/- 0.23 vs. 1.10 +/- 0.26 and 2.27 +/- 0.63 vs. 2.26 +/- 0.63; P = ns for both) territories. Global (1.98 +/- 0.40 vs. 1.90 +/- 0.46; P = ns) and regional CFR (Isc: 1.65 +/- 0.40 vs. 1.67 +/- 0.47, and Rem: 2.25 +/- 0.57 vs. 2.06 +/- 0.51; P = ns) were reproducible. The BA repeatability coefficients (and %BA) for MBF in ischemic and remote territories were 0.3 (28%) and 0.26 (24%) at rest and 0.49 (27%) and 0.58 (26%) during Dob stress. CONCLUSION: In patients with clinically stable CAD, Dob induces reproducible changes in both global and regional MBF and CFR over a time interval of 24 wk. The reproducibility of MBF and CFR with Dob was comparable with the short-term repeatability reported for adenosine and physical exercise in healthy subjects.     

Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow with 13N-ammonia and 3-dimensional PET.

The aim of this study was to compare 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) dynamic PET for the absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with (13)N-ammonia ((13)N-NH(3)). METHODS: 2D and 3D MBF measurements were collected from 21 patients undergoing cardiac evaluation at rest (n = 14) and during standard adenosine stress (n = 7). A lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate-based PET/CT system with retractable septa, enabling the sequential acquisition of 2D and 3D images within the same patient and study, was used. All 2D studies were performed by injecting 700-900 MBq of (13)N-NH(3). For 14 patients, 3D studies were performed with the same injected (13)N-NH(3) dose as that used in 2D studies. For the remaining 7 patients, 3D images were acquired with a lower dose of (13)N-NH(3), that is, 500 MBq. 2D images reconstructed by use of filtered backprojection (FBP) provided the reference standard for MBF measurements. 3D images were reconstructed by use of Fourier rebinning (FORE) with FBP (FORE-FBP), FORE with ordered-subsets expectation maximization (FORE-OSEM), and a reprojection algorithm (RP). RESULTS: Global MBF measurements derived from 3D PET with FORE-FBP (r = 0.97), FORE-OSEM (r = 0.97), and RP (r = 0.97) were well correlated with those derived from 2D FBP (all Ps < 0.0001). The mean +/- SD differences in global MBF measurements between 3D FORE-FBP and 2D FBP and between 3D FORE-OSEM and 2D FBP were 0.01 +/- 0.14 and 0.01 +/- 0.15 mL/min/g, respectively. The mean +/- SD difference in global MBF measurements between 3D RP and 2D FBP was 0.00 +/- 0.16 mL/min/g. The best correlation between 2D PET and 3D PET performed with the lower injected activity was found for the 3D FORE-FBP reconstruction algorithm (r = 0.95, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For this scanner type, quantitative measurements of MBF with 3D PET and (13)N-NH(3) were in excellent agreement with those obtained with the 2D technique, even when a lower activity was injected.     

Effect of caffeine intake on myocardial hyperemic flow induced by adenosine triphosphate and dipyridamole.

The aims of this study were (a). to compare absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) during adenosine triphosphate (ATP) infusion with that after dipyridamole administration without caffeine intake and (b). to evaluate the effect of caffeine intake on the hyperemic flow induced by these coronary vasodilator agents. METHODS: MBF was quantified with (15)O-labeled water and PET at rest, during ATP infusion (0.16 mg/kg/min for 9 min), and after dipyridamole administration (0.56 mg/kg over 4 min) after a 24-h abstinence from caffeine (baseline evaluation) in 10 healthy volunteers. Within 2 wk, the same PET studies were repeated after caffeine intake to evaluate the effect of caffeine on the hyperemic flow induced by these pharmacologic agents (caffeine study). Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), defined as the ratio of hyperemic to resting blood flow, was also evaluated. RESULTS: Resting MBF in baseline and caffeine studies did not differ significantly (0.79 +/- 0.29 vs. 0.75 +/- 0.31 mL/min/g, P = 0.88). Without caffeine intake, MBF during ATP infusion was significantly higher than that after dipyridamole administration (3.70 +/- 0.67 vs. 3.00 +/- 0.79 mL/min/g, P = 0.003), whereas there was no significant difference in MFR between ATP and dipyridamole stress (5.15 +/- 1.64 vs. 4.11 +/- 1.44, P = 0.07). After caffeine intake, the hyperemic flows induced by ATP and dipyridamole were not significantly different (1.68 +/- 0.37 vs. 1.52 +/- 0.40 mL/min/g, P = 0.50). MFR estimated by ATP and dipyridamole also did not differ significantly in the caffeine studies (2.44 +/- 0.88 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.94, P = 0.73). MBF during ATP infusion and after dipyridamole administration were significantly lower in the caffeine studies than that in the baseline evaluation (1.68 +/- 0.37 vs. 3.70 +/- 0.67 mL/min/g, P < 0.0001, and 1.52 +/- 0.40 vs. 3.00 +/- 0.79 mL/min/g, P < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that ATP has the potential to induce greater hyperemia than dipyridamole, whereas hyperemic responses to ATP and dipyridamole are similarly attenuated after caffeine intake. These findings suggest that abstinence from caffeine before ATP stress testing may be needed.     

Does myocardial fibrosis hinder contractile function and perfusion in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy? PET and MR imaging study

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate, by using positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, the interrelationships between regional myocardial fibrosis, perfusion, and contractile function in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the hospital ethics committee, and all subjects gave written informed consent. Sixteen patients with idiopathic DCM (mean age, 54 years +/- 11 [standard deviation]; nine men) and six healthy control subjects (mean age, 28 years +/- 2; five men) were examined with PET and MR tissue tagging. Oxygen 15-labeled water and carbon monoxide were used as tracers at PET to assess myocardial blood flow (MBF) and the perfusable tissue index (PTI), which is inversely related to fibrosis. MBF was determined at rest and during pharmacologically induced hyperemia. Maximum circumferential shortening (E(cc)) was determined with MR tissue tagging. Student t tests were performed for comparison of data sets, and linear regression was used to investigate the association between parameters. RESULTS: Mean global hyperemic MBF (2.23 mL/min/mL +/- 0.73), E(cc) (-10.5% +/- 2.9), and PTI (0.95 +/- 0.10) were lower in the patients with DCM than in the control subjects (4.33 mL/min/mL +/- 0.85, -17.4% +/- 0.6, and 1.09 +/- 0.12, respectively; P < .05 for all). In the patients with DCM, regional PTI was related to E(cc) (r = -0.21, P = .009) but not to resting or hyperemic MBF. Furthermore, regional E(cc) was correlated to both resting (r = -0.28, P = .004) and hyperemic MBF (r = -0.29, P < .001). In addition, the ratio of left ventricular end-diastolic volume to mass, as a reflection of wall stress, was related to global hyperemic MBF (r = -0.52, P = .047) and to global E(cc) (r = 0.69, P = .003). CONCLUSION: In idiopathic DCM, the extent of myocardial fibrosis is related to the impairment in contractile function, whereas fibrosis and perfusion do not seem to be interrelated. The degree of impairment of hyperemic myocardial perfusion is related to contractility and end-diastolic wall stress.     

PET-measured responses of MBF to cold pressor testing correlate with indices of coronary vasomotion on quantitative coronary angiography.

The aims of this study were to determine whether responses in myocardial blood flow (MBF) to the cold pressor testing (CPT) method noninvasively with PET correlate with an established and validated index of flow-dependent coronary vasomotion on quantitative angiography. METHODS: Fifty-six patients (57 +/- 6 y; 16 with hypertension, 10 with hypercholesterolemia, 8 smokers, and 22 without coronary risk factors) with normal coronary angiograms were studied. Biplanar end-diastolic images of a selected proximal segment of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (n = 27) or left circumflex artery (LCx) (n = 29) were evaluated with quantitative coronary angiography in order to determine the CPT-induced changes of epicardial luminal area (LA, mm(2)). Within 20 d of coronary angiography, MBF in the LAD, LCx, and right coronary artery territory was measured with (13)N-ammonia and PET at baseline and during CPT. RESULTS: CPT induced on both study days comparable percent changes in the rate x pressure product (%DeltaRPP, 37% +/- 13% and 40% +/- 17%; P = not significant [NS]). For the entire study group, the epicardial LA decreased from 5.07 +/- 1.02 to 4.88 +/- 1.04 mm(2) (DeltaLA, -0.20 +/- 0.89 mm(2)) or by -2.19% +/- 17%, while MBF in the corresponding epicardial vessel segment increased from 0.76 +/- 0.16 to 1.03 +/- 0.33 mL x min(-1) x g(-1) (DeltaMBF, 0.27 +/- 0.25 mL x min(-1) x g(-1)) or 36% +/- 31% (P 相似文献   

Reduction of coronary flow reserve in areas with and without ischemia on stress perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: A study using oxygen 15-labeled water PET

BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) occasionally fails to detect coronary stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We evaluated coronary flow reserve (CFR) using oxygen 15-labeled water in areas with and without ischemia on technetium 99m tetrofosmin stress perfusion SPECT in patients with angiographically documented CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with CAD and eleven age-matched normal subjects were studied. Baseline myocardial blood flow (MBF) and MBF during hyperemia induced by intravenous adenosine triphosphate infusion (0.16 mg. kg(-1). min(-1)) were determined with the use of O-15-labeled water positron emission tomography, and the CFR was calculated. Tc-99m tetrofosmin stress/rest SPECT was performed for comparison. On the basis of the results of coronary angiography and SPECT, coronary segments were divided into 3 types: segments with coronary stenosis and a perfusion abnormality on stress SPECT imaging (group A, n = 16), segments with coronary stenosis without a perfusion abnormality (group B, n = 42), and remote segments with no coronary stenosis or perfusion abnormality (group C, n = 18). Baseline MBF values were similar among the 3 groups. CFR in group A was lower (1.82 +/- 0.54) than in group B (2.22 +/- 0.87, P <.05), in group C (2.92 +/- 1.21, P <.01), and in normal segments (3.86 +/- 1.24, P <.001). CFR in group B was lower than in group C (P <.02) and in normal segments (P <.001). CFR in group C was lower than in normal segments (P <.02). CONCLUSIONS: Areas with a perfusion abnormality on stress SPECT had reduced CFR. In the areas without a perfusion abnormality and with coronary stenosis, lowering of CFR was intermediate between the areas with a perfusion abnormality and remote segments. Moreover, CFR was slightly, but significantly, lower in remote segments in patients with CAD compared with normal segments.     

Variability of myocardial blood flow measurements by magnetic resonance imaging in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows the noninvasive assessment of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) in mL/min/g during rest, and hyperemia induced by intravenous adenosine, a powerful coronary vasodilator with short decay time. The longitudinal variability in healthy volunteers of the hemodynamic response to adenosine, and of the MBF response, remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the longitudinal variability for resting and hyperemic MBFs in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty participants (19 women, 11 men, mean age 63.2 +/- 9.6; range 45-79 years) underwent 2 MRI exams with an average separation of 334 +/- 158 days (range: 20-645) between the 2 exams, using a rapid, multislice T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging technique at rest and during maximal vasodilation with intravenous adenosine. RESULTS: The absolute repeatability coefficient, corresponding to the 95% confidence intervals of the within subject differences, was 0.29 mL/min/g for rest studies, and 1.13 mL/min/g for hyperemic MBF. The relative repeatability coefficients, expressed as a percentage of the mean blood flow, averaged 30% at rest, and 41% during hyperemia. Differences in resting MBF between the 2 exams from 1.01 +/- 0.22 to 0.91 +/- 0.18 mL/min/g (P = 0.001) were associated with changes in hemodynamic conditions, but no such association was observed for hyperemic MBFs, which averaged 2.84 +/- 0.87 mL/min/g in the first examination, and 2.69 +/- 0.65 mL/min/g at follow-up. Over approximately 1 year of aging between perfusion studies there was no observable decline of the hyperemic response, but the variability of the hyperemic MBF response increased with the lag between baseline and follow-up measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The repeatability of MBF measurements by MRI at rest was similar to results from previous studies with positron emission tomography.     

Assessing coronary sinus blood flow in patients with coronary artery disease: a comparison of phase-contrast MR imaging with positron emission tomography

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine whether MR imaging can be used to reliably measure global myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease as compared with such measurements obtained by positron emission tomography (PET). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We measured myocardial blood flow first at baseline and then after dipyridamole-induced hyperemia in 20 patients with coronary artery disease. Myocardial blood flow as revealed by MR imaging was calculated by dividing coronary sinus flow by the left ventricular mass. Coronary flow reserve was calculated by dividing the rate of hyperemic flow by the rate of baseline flow. RESULTS: Using MR imaging, myocardial blood flow at baseline was 0.73 +/- 0.23 mL x min(-1) x g(-1), and at hyperemia the blood flow was 1.43 +/- 0.37 mL x min(-1) x g(-1), yielding an average coronary flow reserve of 1.99 +/- 0.47. Using PET, myocardial blood flow was 0.89 +/- 0.21 mL x min(-1) x g(-1) at baseline and 1.56 +/- 0.42 mL x min(-1) x g(-1) at hyperemia, yielding an average coronary flow reserve of 1.77 +/- 0.36. The correlation of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve measurements for these two methods was an r of 0.80 (p < 0.01) and an r of 0.50 (p < 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows that myocardial blood flow measurements obtained using MR imaging have a good correlation with corresponding PET measurements. Coronary flow reserve measurements obtained using MR imaging had only moderate correlation with PET-obtained measurements. Our results suggest that MR imaging flow quantification could potentially be used for measuring global myocardial blood flow in patients in whom interventional treatment for coronary artery disease is being evaluated.     

Quantitative evaluation of myocardial blood flow and ejection fraction with a single dose of (13)NH(3) and Gated PET.

To evaluate myocardial blood flow (MBF) and cardiac function with a single dose of (13)NH(3), electrocardiographically (ECG) gated PET acquisition was performed after a dynamic PET scan was obtained. Gated blood-pool (GBP) imaging with C(15)O PET was also performed to compare the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) obtained using the 2 methods. METHODS: Six healthy volunteers and 34 patients with cardiovascular disease were studied. Each subject underwent dynamic PET scanning after a slow intravenous injection of approximately 740 MBq (13)NH(3), followed by ECG gated PET scanning. MBF images were calculated by the Patlak plot method. Before obtaining the (13)NH(3) scan, the GBP image was obtained with a bolus inhalation of C(15)O. Twenty patients also underwent left ventriculography (LVG) to compare the value of the LVEF obtained using this technique with that determined using the gated PET method. RESULTS: The mean regional value of MBF calculated for healthy volunteers in the resting condition was 0.61 +/- 0.10 mL/min/g. The LVEF obtained using GBP PET (EF(CO)) was consistent with that obtained using LVG. The LVEF calculated from gated (13)NH(3) scans (EF(NH3)) correlated well with EF(CO), although EF(NH3) slightly underestimated the LVEF (EF(NH3) = 0.97. EF(CO) - 2.94; r = 0.87). EF(NH3) was significantly different from EF(CO) in patients with a perfusion defect in the cardiac wall (EF(NH3) = 39% +/- 11% vs. EF(CO) = 45% +/- 11%; n = 19; P < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was found between them in subjects with no defect (EF(NH3) = 58% +/- 13% vs. EF(CO) = 61% +/- 10%; n = 21). CONCLUSION: Gated PET acquisition accompanied by obtaining a dynamic PET scan with a single dose of (13)NH(3) is a promising method for the simultaneous clinical evaluation of MBF and cardiac function. However, in patients with a defect in the cardiac wall, EF(NH3) showed a tendency to underestimate the EF compared with EF(CO).     

Comparison of myocardial blood flow induced by adenosine triphosphate and dipyridamole in patients with coronary artery disease

Myocardial perfusion imaging with adenosine triphosphate (ATP) has been used increasingly to diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD) and assess risk for this disease. This study compared absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve index (MFR) with ATP and dipyridamole (DIP) in patients with CAD. MBF was quantified by 15O-H2O PET in 21 patients with CAD (17 male, 4 female), aged 55 to 81 years. MBF was measured at rest, during intravenous injection of ATP (0.16 mg/kg/min), and again after DIP infusion (0.56 mg/kg). Regions of interest were drawn in nonischemic and ischemic segments based on findings from thallium-201 (201T1) scintigraphy and coronary angiography (CAG). Absolute MBF values and indexes of MFR were calculated in nonischemic and ischemic segments. Intravenous injection of ATP and DIP significantly increased MBF in nonischemic (2.4 +/- 0.9 and 2.1 +/- 0.8 ml/g/min, respectively; p < 0.01, for both) and in ischemic segments (1.3 +/- 0.4 and 1.5 +/- 0.4 ml/g/min, respectively; p < 0.01, for both). There was a significant difference in MBF values between ATP and DIP in nonischemic segments (p < 0.05), which was not observed in ischemic segments. In nonischemic segments, ATP produced higher MFR than DIP (2.1 +/- 0.8 and 1.8 +/- 0.7, respectively; p < 0.05), while no significant difference was observed in ischemic segments (1.5 +/- 0.6 and 1.7 +/- 0.3, respectively). ATP produced a greater hyperemia than DIP between the ischemic and nonischemic myocardium in patients with CAD. ATP is as effective as DIP for the diagnosis of CAD.     

Noninvasive PET quantitative myocardial blood flow with regadenoson for assessing cardiac allograft vasculopathy in orthotopic heart transplantation patients

Background

Risk stratification and early detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is essential in orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) patients. This study assesses the changes in myocardial blood flow (MBF) noninvasively in OHT patients using quantitative cardiac PET with regadenoson.

Methods

Twelve patients (Group 1) (8 males, 4 females, mean age 55 ± 7 years) with no history of post OHT myocardial ischemia were enrolled 5.4 ± 2.0 years after OHT. Fifteen patients (Group 2) (9 males, 6 females, mean age 71 ± 9 years) with intermediate pretest probability but not documented evidence for coronary artery disease (CAD) were also included to serve as control. Global and regional MBFs were assessed using dynamic ¹³N-NH₃ PET at rest and during regadenoson-induced hyperemia. The coronary flow reserve (CFR) was also calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to resting MBF.

Results

Mean regadenoson-induced rate-pressure products were similar in both groups, while there was an increase in resting rate-pressure product in Group 1 patients. Both mean and median values of resting MBF were higher in Group 1 than Group 2 patients (1.33 ± 0.31 and 1.01 ± 0.21 mL/min/g for Groups 1 and 2, respectively, P < .001), while mean hyperemic MBF values were similar in both Groups (2.68 ± 0.84 and 2.64 ± 0.94 mL/min/g, P = NS) but median hyperemic MBF values were lower in Group 1 than Group 2 patients (2.0 vs. 2.60 mL/min/g, P = .018). Both mean and median CFR values demonstrated a significant reduction for Group 1 compared to Group 2 patients (2.07 ± 0.74 vs 2.63 ± 0.48, P = .025).

Conclusions

This study suggests that the MBF in OHT patients may be abnormal at resting state with diminished CFR. This hints that the epicardial and microvascular coronary subsystem may be exacerbated after OHT leading to the gradual progression of CAV.