The premedication of cardiac surgical patients

One of four groups of patients was not premedicated; the others received diazepam 10 mg by mouth, diazepam 20 mg by mouth or a combination of pentobarbitone orally and morphine and hyoscine intramuscularly. The cardiovascular and respiratory parameters were studied before and after the premedication and any changes in sedation, apprehension and reaction to pain were noted. The ease of induction of anaesthesia in the four groups was compared. Most of the patients who received the pentobarbitone, morphine and hyoscine combination came to theatre calm, sedated and often asleep. They showed no significant cardiovascular or respiratory depression and the induction of anaesthesia was more satisfactory than in the other groups. Two of the patients who were not premedicated became very agitated in the ward and the remainder of the patients in this group were apprehensive in the anaesthetic room and during induction. The effects of diazepam in the two doses studied were intermediate between those who received the pentobarbitone, morphine and hyoscine and those who were not premedicated.     

Dextromethorphan reduces immediate and late postoperative analgesic requirements and improves patients' subjective scorings after epidural lidocaine and general anesthesia

Central N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors modulate postoperative pain. We compared the effects of preincision oral dextromethorphan (DM), an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, on postoperative IV patient-controlled analgesia morphine demand and on subjective variables in 80 patients undergoing lower-body procedures who were randomly assigned to epidural lidocaine (LA; 16 mL, 1.6%) or general anesthesia (GA). The patients were premedicated 90 min before surgery with placebo or DM 90 mg (20 patients per group) in a double-blinded manner. Postoperative IV patient-controlled analgesia morphine administration started when subjective pain intensity was > or =4 of 10 (visual analog scale) and lasted 2 h. Observation continued up to 3 days, during which patients could use diclofenac. LA-DM and GA-DM patients required 45%-50% less morphine and diclofenac compared with their placebo counterparts (P < 0.001). However, GA-DM patients made twice as many attempts to self-administer morphine as LA-DM patients (P = 0.005). Eight LA-DM versus two GA-DM patients (P < 0.01) used no morphine or diclofenac. All DM patients experienced significantly (P < 0.001) less pain, were less sedated, and felt better than their placebo counterparts; however, compared with placebo, DM improved subjective scorings in the GA patients more significantly (P < 0.05) than in the LA patients. We conclude that oral DM 90 mg in patients undergoing surgery under LA or GA reduces morphine and diclofenac use by approximately 50% in the immediate and late postoperative period compared with placebo. Subjectively scored levels of pain, sedation, and well-being were better as well.     

Patient–controlled analgesia (PCA) leads to more postoperative pain relief,but also to more fatigue and less vigour

This investigation evaluated patient–controlled analgesia (PCA) for subjective well–being and mood in the postoperative period in comparison with the intramuscular (im) administration of morphine given on demand. Patients scheduled for elective upper abdominal surgery were assigned at random to either PCA (n = 17) or im morphine (n= 14). The PCA group experienced significantly more pain relief and consumed more morphine than those who received im morphine. The PCA patients suffered from more fatigue and showed less vigour than the im group. Neither preoperative trait anxiety nor locus of control was associated with postoperative pain in either of the groups.     

Pretreatment with controlled-release morphine for pain after hysterectomy

In a double-blind randomised study, two dosing regimens for controlled-release morphine tablets were compared against placebo to ascertain the extent of prophylactic postoperative pain control in 51 women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. One group of patients received controlled-release morphine every 12 h for 2 days before surgery, a second group received a single dose of controlled-release morphine 2h before surgery and a third group received placebo. Patient-controlled analgesia system demands were compared for the first 38 h after surgery and 10-point pain scores and McGill pain questionnaires were compared for the first 6 postoperative days and at 6 weeks after surgery. During the first 2 days after surgery, patients reported high levels of pain which were similar in all groups. Pain scores on the third and fourth postoperative days were significantly lower in those who had a single pre-operative dose of controlled-release morphine compared with placebo and those who had been treated with morphine every 12 hfor 2 days (p = 0.043 and 0.024 for third and fourth day respectively). Patient-controlled analgesia demands were also fewer and less variable in those patients receiving the single dose of morphine 2h before surgery. The study shows a beneficial analgesic effect of a single pre-operative dose of morphine, but shows no benefit for a more prolonged pre-operative dosing regimen.     

Use of intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain relief after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Laparoscopic surgery has become popular in recent years, but few studies have addressed analgesia for this type of surgery. We conducted a prospective double-blind randomised trial on 36 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to determine the influence of intrathecal morphine on postoperative pain relief. All patients received a subarachnoid block with local anaesthetic in addition to general anaesthesia. One group also received intrathecal morphine. A patient-controlled analgesic (PCA) device was prescribed for pain control postoperatively and the visual analogue score (VAS) was used for pain assessment. The group who received intrathecal morphine used significantly less morphine. There were no adverse cardiovascular effects of the combined anaesthetic technique. Nausea and vomiting remained the main side-effect of intrathecal morphine but this was easily treated with anti-emetics.     

Pre-operative oral administration of morphine in day-case gynaecological laparoscopy

The analgesic effect of morphine sulphate 10 mg by mouth given pre-operatively on pain after gynaecological laparoscopy was studied in a randomised, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison. Two groups of 56 patients were studied, one group undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy and the other laparoscopic sterilisation. All patients received a standard anaesthetic after premedication with morphine or placebo 1 h before the operation. Morphine premedication did not significantly influence postoperative pain as assessed on a visual analogue scale in either group and postoperative opioid consumption was unaffected. Premedication with morphine Wmg orally does not significantly decrease pain after day-case gynaecological laparoscopy.     

Double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of dezocine and morphine for post-operative pain relief

Dezocine, a new mixed agonist-antagonist-type opioid analgesic, was compared in a double-blind trial with placebo and 10 mg of morphine in 190 patients with acute postoperative pain. The medications were given intramuscularly. Dezocine was administered at three dose levels (5, 10, and 15 mg). Pain relief scores, sedation, and side effects were recorded at 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min after injection. Significantly higher pain relief scores (p less than 0.05) were reported for the groups receiving dezocine 10 and 15 mg than the placebo group at all observation times, except for dezocine 15 mg at four hours. Morphine produced significantly better pain relief than placebo only between the second and fourth hour after administration. Significantly better pain relief was obtained with dezocine (10 and 15 mg) than with morphine during the first hour. The mean four-hour cumulative pain relief scores (TOTPAR) were significantly (p less than 0.05) higher than placebo for all active treatment groups. Side effects were few with no significant differences between the treatment groups. Seventy-nine per cent of the patients in the dezocine 15 mg group, and 73, 68, 58 and 50 per cent respectively, of the patients in the dezocine 10 mg, dezocine 5 mg, morphine 10 mg and placebo group had a satisfactory clinical response. Significantly (p less than 0.05) more patients in the groups receiving dezocine 10 and 15 mg than in the placebo group had a satisfactory clinical response; the difference was not significant for the dezocine 5 mg and morphine 10 mg groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Postoperative analgesic effects of celecoxib or rofecoxib after spinal fusion surgery

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are recommended for the multimodal management of postoperative pain and may have a significant opioid-sparing effect after major surgery. The analgesic efficacy of the cyclooxygenase-2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, celecoxib and rofecoxib, have not been evaluated after major orthopedic surgery. This study was designed to determine whether the administration of a preoperative dose of celecoxib or rofecoxib to patients who have undergone spinal stabilization would decrease patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine use and/or enhance analgesia. We evaluated 60 inpatients undergoing spine stabilization by one surgeon. All patients received PCA morphine. The patients were divided into three groups. Preoperatively, they were given oral celecoxib 200 mg, rofecoxib 50 mg, or placebo. The outcome measures included pain scores and 24-h morphine use at six times during the first 24 postoperative h. The total dose of morphine and the cumulative doses for each of the six time periods were significantly more in the placebo group than in the other two groups. The morphine dose was significantly less in five of the six time intervals in the rofecoxib group compared with the celecoxib group. The pain scores were significantly less in the rofecoxib group than in the other two groups at two of the six intervals, and less than the placebo group in an additional interval. Although both rofecoxib and celecoxib produce similar analgesic effects in the first 4 h after surgery, rofecoxib demonstrated an extended analgesic effect that lasted throughout the 24-h study. We thus recommend that rofecoxib be used as a preoperative component of pain management that includes PCA morphine in patients undergoing spine stabilization surgery. Implications: The cyclooxygenase-2-specific nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, celecoxib and rofecoxib, both demonstrate an opioid-sparing effect after spinal fusion surgery. Celecoxib resulted in decreased morphine use for the first 8 h after surgery, whereas rofecoxib demonstrated less morphine use throughout the 24-h study period.     

Epidural morphine prophylaxis of postoperative pain: report of a double-blind multicentre study

In a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 154 subjects, having intraperitoneal surgery or Caesarean section, and 53 patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery, received epidural morphine, 5 mg in 10 ml 0.9 per cent NaCl, or placebo, 10 ml 0.9 per cent NaCl, intraoperatively to determine duration of action and efficacy in preventing postoperative pain. Epidural morphine gave significantly longer postoperative analgesia (greater than 11 h) than placebo (3-6 h) in both groups (p less than 0.05) and patients who received morphine required less postoperative analgesic. Obstetric subjects experienced longer pain relief (18.3 +/- 1.3 h) than patients undergoing non-obstetric intraperitoneal surgery (9.2 +/- 1.2 h) (p less than 0.001). Generally mild pruritus affected more than 40 per cent of those receiving morphine, but over 90 per cent of obstetric patients receiving morphine. Respiratory depression occurred in 2-7 per cent of subjects who received morphine; unpredictable in onset, it responded rapidly to naloxone. Epidural bupivacaine, if employed for the surgical procedure, appeared to prolong epidural morphine analgesia. We consider epidural morphine useful in preventing postoperative pain, but its use demands close observation of respiratory rate in a high density nursing area.     

A placebo-controlled trial of midazolam as an adjunct to morphine patient-controlled analgesia after spinal surgery

Study ObjectiveTo investigate the potential benefit of postoperatively providing a patient-controlled anxiolytic agent, midazolam, in addition to morphine.DesignA double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of patient-controlled midazolam.SettingA Community hospital.Participants29 patients undergoing elective spinal surgery.InterventionsPostoperatively, via two separate patient-controlled pumps, the treatment group received morphine and midazolam, and the control group received morphine and saline solution.MeasurementsRepeated measures using numerical rating scales of the primary outcomes of pain and anxiety were obtained every two hours postoperatively. Amount of morphine and midazolam/placebo administered was assessed, as were other secondary outcomes.Main ResultsAnxiety level in the treatment group declined more rapidly over the 24 hours after surgery than in the control group. The treatment group used less morphine than the control. Preoperative positive affect was the only significant psychological predictor of postoperative outcomes.ConclusionsPatients who received both midazolam and morphine experienced a more rapid decline in anxiety and used less opioid medication than those receiving morphine alone.     

The efficacy of intravenous indomethacin in prevention of postoperative pain

Since intravenous prophylactic anti-inflammatory agents have been suggested to reduce or even replace opiates in postoperative pain therapy, we studied the demand for morphine in 45 patients recovering from abdominal surgery who had received a baseline infusion of either indomethacin, morphine or saline placebo. When extubated after inhalational anaesthesia, each patient received an i.v. bolus of either 0.5 mg.kg-1 indomethacin, 0.07 mg.kg-1 morphine or saline placebo. Thereafter a 20-h infusion of the same test analgesic was started, either 0.1 mg.kg-1.h-1 indomethacin, 0.03 mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine or saline placebo. For additional analgesia, a patient-controlled analgesia device (PCA) delivering 5-mg boluses of morphine was used. For the first 5 postoperative hours, significantly more (P less than 0.05) PCA morphine was needed in the indomethacin group (35 mg) than in the morphine group (24 mg), while the placebo group demanded mean 30 mg. For equal analgesia (measured by VAS and VRS) between 5-20 h, similar amounts (mean 23 and 19 mg) of PCA morphine were required in the indomethacin and morphine groups, in contrast to the placebo group (mean 40 mg) (P less than 0.001). Morphine infusion increased the total consumption of morphine by 25% as compared to placebo. We conclude that, following abdominal surgery, the analgesic effect of indomethacin infusion became apparent after the first 5 postoperative hours, thereafter reducing the demand for PCA morphine by about 40%. Continuous morphine infusion diminishes the postoperative demand for PCA morphine, but also increases the total morphine consumption.     

KETOROLAC TROMETAMOL FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY

We have compared the postoperative morphine requirements andanalgesic efficacy of four doses of i.m. ketorolac 30 mg administered6-hourly with placebo in a double-blind study of patients undergoingmajor or minor orthopaedic surgery. During the 24-h postoperativestudy period which began at the end of surgery, patients wereprescribed i.m. morphine 10 mg as required 2-hourly and assessmentswere made of pain at 4 and 24 h. After major surgery, the medianmorphine consumption over 24 h was 10 mg in patients who receivedketorolac, compared with 30 mg in those who received placebo(P = 0.008). Visual analogue pain scores and verbal pain assessmentswere better than placebo at 4 h (P = 0.028 and P = 0.008, respectively),but were not statistically different between the groups at 24h. Overall assessment of pain was similar in both groups whohad undergone major surgery. In the minor surgery groups, medianmorphine consumption was 0 mg in patients who received ketorolac,compared with 10 mg in those given placebo (ns). Visual analoguepain scores at 24 h after surgery were significantly less inpatients who had received ketorolac compared with placebo (P= 0.046) and the overall assessment of pain relief was betterin the ketorolac group (P = 0.0007). Mandatory administrationof ketorolac appeared to be of benefit in both major and minororthopaedic surgery, although the principal effects were reductionin requirement for supplementary morphine for major surgeryand better overall analgesia for minor surgery.     

Ondansetron, orally disintegrating tablets versus intravenous injection for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced nausea, vomiting, and pruritus in young males

In this study we compared the efficacy of orally disintegrating tablets (ODT) and IV ondansetron for preventing spinal morphine-induced pruritus and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in healthy young male patients. Patients who received bupivacaine with 0.20 mg morphine for spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to the ODT group (ODT ondansetron 8 mg, n = 50), the IV group (4 mg ondansetron IV, n = 50), or the placebo group (n = 50). Each individual was assessed for pruritus, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pain at 0, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after surgery using three distinct visual analog scales. The frequencies of postoperative nausea and vomiting and frequencies of requirement for rescue antiemetic and antipruritic were recorded. There were no significant differences among the three groups with respect to incidence or severity of PONV or postoperative pain visual analog scale scores. The incidences of pruritus in the ODT (56%) and IV (66%) groups were significantly different from that in the placebo group (86%) (P < 0.02 for both). Only the ODT group had significantly lower mean pruritus visual analog scale scores at 0, 2, 6, and 12 h postsurgery than the placebo group (P < 0.023 for all). The frequency of requirement for rescue antipruritic was significantly less in the ODT group than the placebo group (P = 0.013). Both ODT ondansetron 8 mg and IV ondansetron 4 mg are more effective than placebo for preventing spinal morphine-induced pruritus, but neither form of this agent reduces spinal morphine-induced postoperative nausea and vomiting in this patient group.     

Preemptive gabapentin reduces postoperative pain and opioid demand following thyroid surgery

PURPOSE: Gabapentin is reported to possess antihyperalgesic and antiallodynia properties. Recently, reports have indicated that gabapentin may have a place in the treatment of postoperative pain. In this study, we sought to determine whether preemptive use of gabapentin reduced postoperative pain and morphine demand following thyroidectomy. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial, we gave gabapentin 1200 mg or placebo two hours prior to induction of anesthesia to patients undergoing elective thyroidectomy. Post-thyroidectomy pain was assessed on a visual analogue scale at rest and during swallowing in the first 24 hr postoperatively. All patients received morphine 3 mg iv every five minutes until visual analogue scale scores were 4 or less at rest, and 6 or less with swallowing. Total morphine consumption for each patient was recorded from zero to 24 hr postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients in the gabapentin group and 35 patients in the placebo group completed the study. Overall, pain scores at rest and during swallowing in the gabapentin group were significantly lower when compared with the placebo group. Total postoperative morphine consumption in the gabapentin group was 15.2 +/- 7.6 mg (mean +/- SD) vs 29.5 +/- 9.9 mg in the placebo group (P < 0.001). No significant differences in side effects were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative gabapentin decreased pain scores and postoperative morphine consumption in patients following thyroid surgery.     

Indomethacin as a postoperative analgesic for total hip arthroplasty

This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial evaluated the efficacy of rectal indomethacin as an adjunct to morphine for controlling postoperative pain. Fifty healthy patients undergoing elective hip arthroplasty were investigated. Group 1 (n = 25) received placebo suppositories, Group 2(n = 25) received indomethacin suppositories, 100 mg q8hr for five doses, starting at the end of the procedure. Both groups received morphine via a PCA pump, which recorded the amount of morphine delivered each hour. After a standardized general anaesthetic, PCA was begun in the recovery room. Pain was measured with a standard 100 mm VAS at 2, 6, 20, 28, 42 hr after surgery and the morphine consumption recorded. Over the 42-hr study period, patients in Group 2 required less morphine than those in Group 1 (34.8 +/- 21.8 mg vs 89.6 +/- 43.7, P less than 0.01). Pain scores were lower in Group 2 at 20, 28, 42 hr postoperatively. The incidence of side-effects did not differ between groups and no patient had excessive postoperative bleeding. The combination of indomethacin and morphine provided superior pain relief to morphine alone even though the control group had liberal access to morphine. This synergistic effect would make indomethacin a useful adjunct to intramuscular or epidural narcotics.     

Low-dose intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate

Thirty patients undergoing lidocaine spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were studied to evaluate the effectiveness of low-dose intrathecal morphine (ITM) for postoperative analgesia. In a double-blinded fashion, groups of ten patients received either 0.1 mg morphine, 0.2 mg morphine, or placebo (control group) intrathecally with lidocaine 75 mg. Standard postoperative analgesics were available to all patients. Patients receiving 0.1 mg or 0.2 mg morphine reported significantly less postoperative pain as assessed by an inverse numerical visual pain scale and required significantly fewer postoperative analgesic interventions than the control group. There was no difference between the 0.1 mg ITM and 0.2 mg ITM groups with regard to severity of postoperative pain or analgesic requirements. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in the group receiving 0.2 mg ITM than in the control group. Six patients (60%) in the 0.2 mg ITM group, two patients (20%) in the 0.1 mg ITM group, and one patient (10%) in the control group experienced nausea and vomiting. No clinically evident respiratory depression occurred in any of the subjects. The authors conclude that administration of 0.1 mg or 0.2 mg of morphine intrathecally is effective in reducing postoperative pain following TURP and that 0.1 mg ITM is not associated with nausea and vomiting.     

A double-blind comparison of multiple intramuscular doses of ciramadol, morphine, and placebo for the treatment of postoperative pain

Ciramadol, an agonist-antagonist analgesic (in intramuscular doses of 30 and 60 mg) was compared with 10 mg of morphine and placebo in a double-blind, parallel study in 160 patients with postoperative pain. The patients were assigned randomly to one of the four treatment groups and could receive a dose of the medication every 3 hr as needed for 48 hr; a maximum of six doses was allowed in a 24-hr period. Formal efficacy assessments using standard pain intensity and pain relief scales were restricted to the initial dose period. The three active therapy groups had significantly (P less than 0.05) higher analgesia scores than the placebo group on all efficacy scales. The mean cumulative efficacy scores for the initial dose evaluation were highest for 60 mg of ciramadol; however, patients' overall evaluations of therapy were highest in the morphine group. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequent adverse experiences (15-25% incidence); however, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in their occurrence. A greater percentage (P less than 0.05) of patients reported skin reactions in the 60 mg ciramadol group (15%) than in the 30 mg ciramadol (0%) and placebo (0%) groups. Sedation was slightly higher with the active therapies than with placebo. Changes in vital signs were minimal. It is concluded that 60 mg of ciramadol compares favorably with 10 mg of morphine as a postoperative analgesic.     

Effects of postoperative pain on lung volume in patients undergoing aortic surgery

To evaluate the potential advantages of the administration of extradural morphine to control postoperative pain and its effects on respiratory function, 39 patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups before aortic surgery. The first group (20 patients) received intravenous analgesia as required (control group). The second group (19 patients) received extradural morphine in a programmed fashion. During the immediate postoperative period the following parameters were measured in both groups: respiratory rate, vital capacity, peak expiratory volume in the first second, PaO2, PaCO2, arterial pH, heart rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In the group treated with morphine the postoperative increase in heart and respiratory rate was significantly smaller than in the control group (p less than 0.01). Postoperative forced pulmonary volumes were higher in the morphine group (p less than 0.01). However, there were no differences in time of hospitalization between both groups. There were more complications in the control group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance.     

Premedication with intramuscular dixyrazine: (Esucos®)

Ninety patients scheduled for general or orthopaedic surgical procedures were randomly assigned to receive one of three i.m. premedications: dixyrazine 0.5 mg kg-1; morphine 0.15 mg kg-1 and scopolamine 0.0065 mg kg-1; or placebo. The premedication was administered and evaluated in a double-blind fashion. The patients were anaesthetized with thiopentone, fentanyl, pancuronium, and ventilated with nitrous oxide in oxygen. The three premedications had no noticeable anxiolytic effect. Although there was no difference in the frequency of observed postoperative nausea and vomiting between the three groups, premedication with dixyrazine nonetheless reduced the patients' experience of postoperative nausea as well as their need for postoperative antiemetics. Although patients in the two treatment groups were significantly more sedated immediately before induction of anaesthesia than patients receiving placebo, the degree of postoperative sedation was similar in all three groups. Morphine-scopolamine caused more postoperative dizziness than dixyrazine and placebo. Lack of recall was produced by both morphine-scopolamine and dixyrazine. It is concluded that premedication with dixyrazine is a useful alternative, especially in patients who have previously experienced postoperative nausea and vomiting.     

Stress reduction and analgesia in patients exposed to calming music postoperatively: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate, first, whether intra- or postoperative music therapy could influence stress and immune response during and after general anaesthesia and second, if there was a different response between patients exposed to music intra- or postoperatively. METHOD: Seventy-five patients undergoing open hernia repair as day care surgery were randomly allocated to three groups: intraoperative music, postoperative music and silence (control group). Anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia were standardized and the same surgeon performed all the operations. Stress response was assessed during and after surgery by determining the plasma cortisol and blood glucose levels. Immune function was evaluated by studying immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels. Patients' postoperative pain, anxiety, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation were also studied as stress markers. RESULTS: There was a significantly greater decrease in the level of cortisol in the postoperative music group vs. the control group (206 and 72 mmol L(-1) decreases, respectively) after 2 h in the post anaesthesia care unit. The postoperative music group had less anxiety and pain and required less morphine after 1 h compared with the control group. In the postoperative music group the total requirement of morphine was significantly lower than in the control group. The intraoperative music group reported less pain after 1 h in the post anaesthesia care unit. There was no difference in IgA, blood glucose, BP, HR and oxygen saturation between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that intraoperative music may decrease postoperative pain, and that postoperative music therapy may reduce anxiety, pain and morphine consumption.