Topical tetracaine prior to arterial puncture: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

The objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to determine whether a topical anesthetic agent (tetracaine) provides effective local analgesia prior to radial arterial puncture. Tetracaine or placebo gel was applied 45 min prior to arterial puncture to patients who were referred for elective arterial blood gas. The primary outcome was the patient's perception of pain associated with the procedure as measured by a visual analog scale. Fifty patients were randomized into the study, 24 received tetracaine and 26 placebo. Mean pain score on the visual analog scale was 26.2 +/- 32.6 for the tetracaine-treated patients and 23.8 +/- 27.4 for the placebo-treated patients (P = 0.78). Mean time from the first skin puncture to successful procurement of 1 ml of arterial blood was 70 +/- 103s in the tetracaine group and 49 +/- 48s in the placebo group (P = 0.40). Difficulty of arterial puncture as assessed by the respiratory therapist performing the test was identical for the two groups (P = 0.86). We conclude that tetracaine gel did not decrease patient's perception of pain associated with arterial puncture, nor did its use facilitate the ABG procedure.     

The beta-agonist lung injury trial (BALTI): a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

RATIONALE: Experimental data suggest that manipulation of alveolar fluid clearance with beta-agonists can accelerate the resolution of alveolar edema and improve survival. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a sustained infusion of intravenous salbutamol (albuterol) would accelerate the resolution of alveolar edema in adult patients with acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: This was a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients with ALI/ARDS were randomized to treatment with intravenous salbutamol (15 microg kg(-1) h(-1)) or placebo for 7 d. The primary endpoint was extravascular lung water measured by thermodilution (PiCCO) at Day 7. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were screened; of these, 40 met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled during 2001-2003. Patients in the salbutamol group had significantly lower lung water at Day 7 than the placebo group (9.2 +/- 6 vs. 13.2 +/- 3 ml kg(-1); 95% confidence interval difference, 0.2-8.3 ml kg(-1); p = 0.038). Plateau airway pressure was lower at Day 7 in the salbutamol group (23.9 +/- 3.8 cm H2O) versus placebo (29.5 +/- 7.2 cm H2O; p = 0.049). There was a trend toward lower Murray lung injury score at Day 7 in the salbutamol group (1.7 +/- 0.9) versus placebo (2.0 +/- 0.6; p = 0.2). Patients in the salbutamol group had a higher incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias (26 vs. 10%; p = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Although further research is required to confirm the efficacy and safety of intravenous salbutamol in ALI/ARDS, this trial provides the first proof of principle that, in humans with ALI/ARDS, sustained treatment with intravenous beta-agonists reduces extravascular lung water.     

S-Adenosylmethionine in alcoholic liver cirrhosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial

BACKGROUND/AIM: The efficacy of S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) in the treatment of liver cell injury has been demonstrated in several experimental models. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of AdoMet treatment in human alcoholic liver cirrhosis. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind trial was performed in 123 patients treated with AdoMet (1200 mg/day, orally) or placebo for 2 years. All patients had alcoholic cirrhosis, and histologic confirmation of the diagnosis was available in 84% of the cases. Seventy-five patients were in Child class A, 40 in class B, and 8 in class C. Sixty-two patients received AdoMet and 61 received placebo. RESULTS: At inclusion into the trial no significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to sex, age, previous episodes of major complications of cirrhosis, Child classification and liver function tests. The overall mortality/liver transplantation at the end of the trial decreased from 30% in the placebo group to 16% in the AdoMet group, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.077). When patients in Child C class were excluded from the analysis, the overall mortality/liver transplantation was significantly greater in the placebo group than in the AdoMet group (29% vs. 12%, p = 0.025), and differences between the two groups in the 2-year survival curves (defined as the time to death or liver transplantation) were also statistically significant (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The present results indicate that long-term treatment with AdoMet may improve survival or delay liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis, especially in those with less advanced liver disease.     

Colchicine treatment of alcoholic cirrhosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of patient survival

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colchicine improved survival and reversed cirrhosis in several small clinical trials. We compared the efficacy and safety of long-term colchicine, as compared with placebo, in patients with advanced alcoholic cirrhosis. METHODS: Five hundred forty-nine patients with advanced (Pugh B or C) alcoholic cirrhosis were randomized to receive either colchicine 0.6 mg twice per day (n = 274) or placebo (n = 275). Treatment lasted from 2 to 6 years. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were liver-related morbidity and mortality. Liver biopsy was requested prior to entry and after 24 months of treatment. RESULTS: Attendance at scheduled clinic visits and adherence with study medication were similar in colchicine and placebo groups. Alcohol intake was less than 1 drink per day in 69% of patients. In an intention-to-treat analysis, all-cause mortality was similar in colchicine (49%) and placebo (45%) patients (P = .371). Mortality attributed to liver disease was 32% in colchicine and 28% in placebo patients (P = .337). Fewer patients receiving colchicine developed hepatorenal syndrome. In 54 patients with repeat liver biopsies after 24 or more months of treatment, cirrhosis improved to septal fibrosis in 7 patients (3 colchicine, 4 placebo) and to portal fibrosis in 1 patient (colchicine). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced alcoholic cirrhosis, colchicine does not reduce overall or liver-specific mortality. Liver histology improves to septal fibrosis in a minority of patients after 24 months of treatment, with similar rates of improvement in patients receiving placebo and colchicine. Colchicine is not recommended for patients with advanced alcoholic cirrhosis.     

Naltrexone depot for treatment of alcohol dependence: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Studies of the efficacy of naltrexone for alcohol dependence have yielded variable findings, which may be due, in part, to variation in compliance with oral naltrexone. Efforts to improve naltrexone compliance have included the development of injectable, long-acting depot formulations. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter trial in 315 subjects who were randomly assigned to receive an intramuscular injection of a depot formulation containing naltrexone (n = 158) or a placebo formulation (n = 157) monthly for 3 months. All patients received five sessions of manual-guided motivational enhancement therapy during the 12 weeks of the study. The outcomes of interest were based on self-reported alcohol use and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase level. Missing data or data from subjects who discontinued the study were conservatively treated as heavy-drinking days. RESULTS: Groups were comparable on pretreatment demographic and clinical measures. The medication was well tolerated; 73.7% of subjects received all injections. The time to the first heavy-drinking day, the percentage of subjects with no heavy drinking throughout the study, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase levels favored the naltrexone depot, although the effects did not reach statistical significance. There was a significant advantage for naltrexone depot treatment on the time to the first drinking day. Naltrexone depot subjects also had significantly fewer drinking days during treatment and a significantly greater abstinence rate than the placebo group (18% vs. 10%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multicenter study of a depot formulation of naltrexone for the treatment of alcohol dependence. Using a conservative intent-to-treat analysis, the study showed an advantage for the active medication. Further research with this formulation is warranted.     

Modulation of CCR2 in rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: CCR2 is a chemokine receptor expressed by monocytes, macrophages, and a subset of T cells. Its ligand, CCL2 (monocyte chemotactic protein 1), is abundantly present in the synovium of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Blocking CCR2 prevents CCL2-mediated chemotaxis in vitro and modulates arthritis in animal models of RA. In this study we examined the effects of CCR2 blockade on synovial inflammation in RA. METHODS: The study was designed as a phase IIa clinical trial with a human CCR2 blocking antibody (MLN1202) in patients with active RA. Thirty-two patients received 3 infusions, over a period of 6 weeks, with either placebo (n = 9) or anti-CCR2 monoclonal antibody at 0.5 mg/kg (n = 7), 1.5 mg/kg (n = 7), or 4.0 mg/kg (n = 9). Safety was monitored with laboratory tests, immunotoxicity assessments, and documenting of adverse events, and European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology response criteria were used to assess clinical improvement. Synovial tissue was obtained at baseline and after 43 days of treatment, for pharmacodynamic analysis using immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare groups, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess changes within the groups. RESULTS: All patients completed the study. Treatment with CCR2 blocking antibody reduced the levels of free CCR2 on CD14+ monocytes by at least 57% and up to 94% (P < 0.001), demonstrating the biologic activity of the compound. However, there was no reduction in the levels or expression of any of the synovial biomarkers. Accordingly, no clinical improvement was observed. CONCLUSION: Treatment with anti-CCR2 blocking antibody did not result in amelioration of synovial inflammation in active RA. The results do not support the notion that blockade of CCR2 may be sufficient to induce clinical improvement in RA.     

Beneficial effects of terlipressin in hepatorenal syndrome: a prospective,randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) occurs in about 18% of cirrhotic patients with ascites and is characterized by intense renal vasoconstriction, low glomerular filtration rate and preserved tubular function and normal renal histology. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of terlipressin on renal function, systemic hemodynamics and clinical outcome in patients with HRS. METHODS: The study was a randomized controlled single-blind trial. We randomly assigned 24 consecutive patients with HRS to treatment with terlipressin 1 mg i.v. at 12-h intervals (group A; n = 12) or placebo at 12-h intervals (group B; n = 12). The end-point of the study was improvement in renal functions defined as reversal of HRS and survival at 15 days. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable at baseline. After treatment with terlipressin, urine output significantly (P < 0.05) increased progressively in group A (day 4, 960 +/- 40 mL/24 h; day 8, 1068 +/- 56 mL/24 h) compared with group B (day 4, 451 +/- 40 mL/24 h; day 8, 291 +/- 45 mL/24 h). Creatinine clearance improved (P < 0.05) in group A (day 4, 20.2 +/- 2.1 mL/min; day 8, 35 +/- 2.8 mL/min) compared with group B (day 4, 11.3 +/- 1.3 mL/min; day 8, 9.3 +/- 1.7 mL/min). Serum creatinine decreased in group A but not in group B (day 8, 1.6 +/- 0.01 compared with 3.9 +/- 0.26, P < 0.05). Mean arterial pressure increased significantly (P < 0.05) in group A. Terlipressin administration was associated with transient self-limiting side-effects including crampy abdominal pain in two patients and cardiac arrhythmias in three patients. Five of the 12 patients survived in group A compared with none in group B at day 15 (P < 0.05) and all survivors had reversal of HRS. CONCLUSION: In patients with HRS, terlipressin significantly improved renal functions and systemic hemodynamics, and showed a trend towards better clinical outcome. The drug merits further evaluation with different dosages and longer schedules.     

Divalproex sodium in alcohol withdrawal: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Divalproex sodium, an anticonvulsant and antikindling agent and gamma-aminobutyric acid enhancer, has been proposed as an alternative to benzodiazepines for treating alcohol withdrawal. This study reports on a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of divalproex sodium in acute alcohol withdrawal. METHODS: Thirty-six hospitalized patients experiencing moderate alcohol withdrawal as measured by a score of at least 10 on the revised Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale (CIWA-Ar) were randomized to receive either divalproex sodium 500 mg three times per day for 7 days or matched placebo in a double-blind manner. All subjects received a baseline dose of oxazepam and had additional oxazepam available as a rescue medication in accordance with a standard, symptom-triggered detoxification protocol. Mean total milligrams of oxazepam received, progression of withdrawal symptoms, psychological distress as measured by the Symptom Checklist-90, side effects, and adverse outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Use of divalproex sodium resulted in less use of oxazepam (p < 0.033). Group differences seemed primarily driven by those subjects who experienced symptoms above threshold level (CIWA-Ar >or=10) after 12 hr. The progression in severity of withdrawal symptoms (increase in CIWA-Ar above baseline) was also significantly greater in the placebo group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This placebo-controlled pilot study suggests that divalproex sodium significantly affects the course of acute alcohol withdrawal and reduces the need for treatment with a benzodiazepine. A more aggressive loading dose strategy may demonstrate a more robust or earlier response.     

Experience with a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of a disease-modifying drug for osteoarthritis: the doxycycline trial

Little effort has gone into the development of more effective analgesics for osteoarthritic pain. Efforts to improve symptomatic therapy for osteoarthritis have been deflected or diluted by a decision to pursue the development of disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOADs). These agents' main mechanism of action is directed not at the relief of joint pain but at slowing the progression of structural damage. This article describes the results of a recent randomized placebo-controlled designed to examine the DMOAD effect in humans of the tetracycline antibiotic doxycycline, and reviews the experience gained from other recent DMOAD trials in humans.     

The role of routinely given hyoscine-N-butylbromide in colonoscopy: a double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled,clinical trial

Objective: Hyoscine-N-butylbromide (HBB) has been proposed to ease colonoscopy and improve mucosal visualization, yet the results from previous studies are conflicting. In our prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study we aimed at evaluating whether routine administration of HBB, before and during colonoscopy, ease the procedure or increase the detection rate for polyps. Material and methods: One hundred fifty outpatients scheduled for an elective colonoscopy were randomized to receive intravenous injections of either 10?mg hyoscine-N-butylbromide or saline before insertion and at cecum. Patient tolerance and technical ease of colonoscopy were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). Procedure times were recorded. Number of detected polyps per patient was evaluated as well. Heart rate was monitored with a pulse oximetry. Results: HBB did not improve patient tolerance or technically ease the procedure as evaluated by VAS. However, HBB led to faster ileal intubation (1.5 vs 2.0 min, p?p?=?0.03). Patients who received HBB also needed less often external abdominal pressure (48.6 vs 66.7%, p?=?0.03). HBB did not improve polyp detection rate (0.89 vs 0.91, p?=?0.90). HBB induced a significant rise in heart rate (p?p?Conclusions: Routine administration of HBB before and during colonoscopy yields only limited improvement in the technical performance of the examination compromised by high incidence of tachycardia.     

Low HDL predicts differential blood pressure effects from two weight-loss approaches: a secondary analysis of blood pressure from a randomized, clinical weight-loss trial

Examining predictors of blood-pressure (BP) response to weight-loss diets might provide insight into mechanisms and help guide clinical care. We examined whether certain baseline patient characteristics (e.g. diet, medical history and laboratory tests) predicted BP response to two weight-loss diet approaches that differ in macronutrient content. One hundred and forty-six overweight adult outpatients were randomized to either a low-carbohydrate diet (N = 72) or orlistat plus a low-fat diet (N = 74) for 48 weeks. Predictors of BP reduction were evaluated using a structured approach and random effects regression models. Participants were 56% African-American, 72% male and 53 (±10) years-old. Of the variables considered, low baseline high-density lipoprotein (HDL) predicted greater reduction in BP in those patients who received the low-carbohydrate diet (p = 0.03 for systolic BP; p = 0.03 for diastolic BP and p = 0.02 for mean arterial pressure). A low HDL level may identify patients who will have greater BP improvement on a low-carbohydrate diet.     

Slow-release lanreotide in Graves' ophthalmopathy: A double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

SS analogs are an attractive alternative in treating Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO). Most of the previous studies were uncontrolled and enrolled few patients. The present study was conducted as a larger scale, prospective, randomized controlled study to determine the effectiveness of a slow-release formulation of lanreotide in GO. Sixty patients with active GO received an im injection every two weeks of either lanreotide 30 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. They were then followed and further treated in the traditional way if necessary. The Clinical Activity Score (CAS) was the primary efficacy criterion. Proptosis, diplopia, corneal erosion or ulcer, visual acuity, extraocular muscle movement and intraocular pressure were also evaluated. At the end of the 12 weeks, the mean CAS was not significantly decreased in the lanreotide group compared to the placebo group. The overall mean difference of proptosis between these two groups also did not reach significance at 12 weeks. Only diplopia at downward gaze had significant improvement for the lanreotide- treated group vs placebo group (p = 0.03). No differences were observed between the two groups compared to other outcome measures. During the 24-month follow-up after the clinical trial, 14 patients received eye surgery in the placebo group compared with 10 patients in the lanreotide group (p = 0.29). Six patients received methylprednisolone pulse therapy in the placebo group and two patients in the lanreotide group (p = 0.25). In conclusion, lanreotide treatment had no significant effects on GO compared with placebo.     

Lack of efficacy of acetaminophen in treating symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled comparison trial with diclofenac sodium

BACKGROUND: Recommendations state that acetaminophen should be used in preference to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the initial treatment of symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee, because of lesser toxicity and the pervasive belief that acetaminophen is not only effective in treating OA pain but is of equal analgesic efficacy as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of diclofenac sodium, 75 mg twice daily, vs acetaminophen, 1000 mg 4 times daily, in 82 subjects with symptomatic OA of the medial knee. Osteoarthritis was quantitated radiographically, and subjects met stringent baseline pain criteria. The primary evaluation of efficacy used the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, with evaluations at screening, baseline, and 2 and 12 weeks after treatment. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. RESULTS: Twenty-five subjects were randomized to diclofenac, 29 to acetaminophen, and 28 to placebo. The groups were closely matched for age, sex, body mass index, prior use of OA medications, baseline pain, and radiographic features. At 2 and 12 weeks, clinically and statistically significant (P<.001) improvements were seen in the diclofenac-treated group; however, no significant improvements were seen in the acetaminophen-treated group (P =.92 at 2 weeks and.19 at 12 weeks). Stratification of subjects according to baseline pain, prestudy OA medication, and radiographic grade showed no clear pattern of preferential response to diclofenac, and did not reveal a subset of subjects who responded to acetaminophen. CONCLUSIONS: Diclofenac is effective in the symptomatic treatment of OA of the knee, but acetaminophen is not. A review of the literature reveals that there is scanty published evidence for a therapeutic effect of acetaminophen relative to placebo in patients with OA of the knee, because most published studies use active comparators (ie, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) only. The advocacy of acetaminophen use in subjects with OA of the knee should be reconsidered pending further placebo-controlled studies.     

Efficacy of a CO2-releasing suppository in dyschezia: A double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

BackgroundConstipation has a significant impact on quality of life. Aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and the efficacy for relieving dyschezia symptoms of a CO₂-releasing suppository in a randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.MethodsFifty-three office-based primary care physicians and 24 gastroenterologists conducted the study in France, between November 2010 and January 2012. Patients (aged 18–75 years) with dyschezia were eligible. Patients were randomly allocated a once-a-day suppository (CO₂-releasing suppository or placebo) for 21 days. Primary endpoint was the change, from Day 0 to Day 21, in the intensity of discomfort related to dyschezia based on a self-assessed 0–100 visual analogue scale.ResultsA total of 323 patients were randomized, i.e. 166 into the intervention group and 157 into the placebo group. Co-variance analysis showed a greater reduction in discomfort visual analogue scale score in the intervention group (−34.5 mm; standard error of the mean: 1.8 mm) than in the placebo group (−26.2 mm; standard error of the mean: 1.9 mm; p < 0.001). The greater efficacy of the CO₂-releasing suppository was confirmed for all secondary efficacy parameters. No significant side effects for either treatment were observed.ConclusionA CO₂-releasing suppository is more effective than a placebo for the relief of symptoms of dyschezia. This efficacy is associated with a good safety profile.     

Alendronate in primary hyperparathyroidism: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is often associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to determine whether alendronate (ALN), 10 mg daily, maintains or improves BMD in patients with PHPT. Eligible patients had asymptomatic PHPT and did not meet surgical guidelines or refused surgery. Forty-four patients randomized to placebo or active treatment arms were stratified for gender. At 12 months, patients taking placebo crossed over to active treatment. All patients were on active treatment in yr 2. The primary outcome index, BMD, at the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck, total hip, and distal one third radius was measured every 6 months by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Calcium, phosphorous, PTH, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) activity, urinary calcium, and urinary N-telopeptide (NTX) excretion were monitored every 3 months. Treatment with alendronate over 2 yr was associated with a significant (6.85%; micro(d) = 0.052; +/-0.94% se; P < 0.001) increase in LS BMD in comparison with baseline. Total hip BMD increased significantly at 12 months with alendronate by 4.01% (micro(d) = 0.027; +/-0.77% se; P < 0.001) from baseline and remained stable over the next 12 months of therapy. BMD at the one third radius site did not show any statistically significant change in the alendronate-treated group at 12 or 24 months of therapy. At 24 months, the alendronate-treated group showed a 3.67% (micro(d) = 0.022; +/-1.63% se; P = 0.038) gain in bone density at the femoral neck site in comparison with baseline. The placebo group, when crossed over to alendronate at 12 months, showed a significant change of 4.1% (micro(d) = 0.034; +/-1.12% se; P = 0.003) in the LS BMD and 1.7% (micro(d) = 0.012; +/-0.81% se; P = 0.009) at the total hip site in comparison with baseline. There was no statistically significant change seen in the placebo group at 12 months at any BMD site and no significant change at 24 months for the distal one third radius or femoral neck sites. Alendronate was associated with marked reductions in bone turnover markers with rapid decreases in urinary NTX excretion by 66% (micro(d) = -60.27; +/-13.5% se; P < 0.001) at 3 months and decreases in BSAP by 49% at 6 months (micro(d) = -15.98; +/-6.32% se; P < 0.001) and by 53% at 9 and 12 months (micro(d) = -17.11; +/-7.85% se; P < 0.001; micro(d) = -17.36; +/-6.96% se; P < 0.001, respectively) of therapy. In the placebo group, NTX and BSAP levels remained elevated. Serum calcium (total and ionized), PTH, and urine calcium did not change with alendronate therapy. In PHPT, alendronate significantly increases BMD at the LS at 12 and 24 months from baseline values. Significant reductions in bone turnover occur with stable serum calcium and PTH levels. Alendronate may be a useful alternative to parathyroidectomy in asymptomatic PHPT among those with low BMD.     

Pharmacodynamic assessment of prasugrel and clopidogrel in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke: a multicenter,randomized, active-control clinical trial

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis - Prasugrel, a novel P2Y12 receptor antagonist, has been shown to be more effective than clopidogrel for preventing cardiovascular events in patients with...