In vitro and in vivo metabolisms of 1-pentyl-3-(4-methyl-1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH-122)

1-Pentyl-3-(4-methyl-1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH-122) is an agonist of the cannabinoid receptors CB₁ and CB₂. In this study, the phase I and phase II metabolisms of JWH-122 were investigated using two models. In vitro studies using incubations of JWH-122 with human liver microsomes were performed to obtain metabolites of the drug at the initial step; 11 classes of metabolites were found and analyzed by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS–MS). Hydroxylation(s) on the naphthalene moiety and/or the indole moiety of the molecule took place as such or in combination with dehydrogenation or cleavage of the N-pentyl side chain. Furthermore, dihydrodiol metabolites were formed probably via epoxide formation on the naphthalene moiety, irrespective of the combination with hydroxylation(s). A metabolite carrying a carboxyl group on the N-pentyl side chain was also detected. As the second step of the study, in vivo experiments using chimeric mice were performed; the mice were orally administered JWH-122, and their urine samples were collected, subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis, and analyzed by LC–MS and LC–MS–MS. The urine samples without hydrolysis were also analyzed for their molecular formulae in the conjugated forms by LC–high resolution MS. The in vivo model using chimeric mice confirmed most metabolite classes and clarified the phase II metabolism of JWH-122. It was concluded that all metabolites formed in vivo were excreted conjugated as glucuronide or sulfate, with conjugation rates above 50 %.     

Identification and quantitation of cannabimimetic compound JWH-250 as an adulterant in products obtained via the Internet

During our careful survey of unregulated drugs in Tokyo, a new compound was disclosed as an adulterant in herbal and powder products. This compound was found to have a molecular weight of 335 by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and the accurate mass measurement suggested an elementary composition of C₂₂H₂₆NO₂. Using these mass data together with those obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance analysis, the compound was identified as 1-pentyl-3-(2-methoxyphenylacetyl)indole (JWH-250), which had been reported by Huffman and coworkers in 2005. This compound was classified as a phenylacetylindole and a cannabinoid receptor agonist. For quantitation of the compound in herbal and powder products, each product was extracted with methanol under ultrasonication to prepare the solution for analysis by liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. The contents of JWH-250 in five products ranged from 77.4 to 165 mg per pack.     

Identification and quantitation of two benzoylindoles AM-694 and (4-methoxyphenyl)(1-pentyl-1<Emphasis Type="Italic">H</Emphasis>-indol-3-yl)methanone,and three cannabimimetic naphthoylindoles JWH-210, JWH-122, and JWH-019 as adulterants in illegal products obtained via the Internet

During our careful surveillance of unregulated drugs, we found five new compounds used as adulterants in herbal and drug-like products obtained via the Internet. These compounds were identified by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, accurate mass spectrometry, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The first compound identified was a benzoylindole AM-694, which is 1-[(5-fluoropentyl)-1H-indol-3-yl]-(2-iodophenyl)methanone (1). The second compound was (4-methoxyphenyl)(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone (2), which was also classified as a benzoylindole. The three other compounds were identified as naphthoylindoles JWH-210 (4-ethylnaphthalen-1-yl-(1-pentylindol-3-yl)methanone; 3), JWH-122 (4-methylnaphthalen-1-yl-(1-pentylindol-3-yl)methanone; 4), and JWH-019 (1-hexyl-3-(naphthalen-1-oyl)indole; 5). All compounds except compound 2 had been reported to be cannabinoid receptor agonists. For quantitation of the five compounds and previously reported compounds, each product was extracted with methanol under ultrasonication to prepare a test solution for analysis by liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Each compound detected in 43 commercial products showed large variation in content ranging from 4.0 to 359 mg per pack.     

Simultaneous determination of tryptamine analogues in designer drugs using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

In recent years, a large number of tryptamine-based designer drugs have been encountered in forensic samples. We have developed simultaneous analytical methods for 14 tryptamine analogues using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS–MS). Trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivatives of the analytes were separated on a DB-1ms column within 15 min. The structural isomers could be differentiated by electron ionization GC–MS. LC–MS–MS with a C₁₈ column could separate structural isomers of tryptamines except for a combination of 5-methoxy-N,N-diethyltryptamine and 5-methoxy-N-methyl-N-isopropyltryptamine. Higher collision energy gave different product ion spectra between the structural isomers. The results indicate that GC–MS is the first choice for identification of tryptamines, preferably after TMS derivatization, and LC–MS–MS can be used as a complementary approach for the unequivocal differentiation of tryptamine isomers.     

Regioisomeric differentiation of the alkyl-substituted synthetic cannabinoids JWH-122 and JWH-210 by GC-EI-MS/MS

Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) are known to have structural or positional isomers. While regulations on synthetic drugs like synthetic cathinones and SCs have been placed worldwide for the ever-growing variety of new designer drugs, laws may not necessarily be applicable to their isomers. Toxicological differences may also exist among isomers for which most new designer drugs are still uninvestigated; thus, isomer differentiation becomes of forensic importance. The aim of this study was to differentiate the regioisomers of alkyl-substituted naphthoylindole-type SCs JWH-122 and JWH-210. Reference standards of the two drugs and their regioisomers were analyzed by gas chromatography–electron ionization-mass spectrometry (GC–EI-MS) first in full scan mode. Isomers that produced identical EI spectra were further analyzed by GC-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) by selecting appropriate precursor ions. For JWH-210, comparison of the product ion spectra and the relative ion intensity ratios obtained from precursor ions at m/z 312 and 183 enabled differentiation between all seven regioisomers. Complete isomeric differentiation by MS/MS analysis was not attainable for JWH-122; however, combining chromatographic results with MS/MS analysis results enabled differentiation for all isomers. Two basic fragmentation pathways were speculated for both SCs; for JWH-210, fragmentation pathway tendencies differed among the isomers, resulting in their distinguishability. Our results demonstrated that the difference between the methyl (JWH-122) and ethyl (JWH-210) group substituents contributed to fragmentation pathway tendency differences and further distinguishability between the regioisomers. Functional group differences, especially their stereochemistries, were indicated to be critical factors in positional isomer differentiation by GC-MS/MS.     

A large amount of new designer drug diphenidine coexisting with a synthetic cannabinoid 5-fluoro-AB-PINACA found in a dubious herbal product

Traffic police brought five dubious herbal product packages to our laboratory for toxicological analysis. These products usually contain one or multiple kinds of synthetic cannabinoids. In one of the packages, we identified the coexistence of a new type of dubious drug (diphenidine) with the synthetic cannabinoid 5-fluoro-AB-PINACA. Conclusive identification was performed by comparison of the mass spectra of the test herb extracts with those of the reference standards of diphenidine and 5-fluoro-AB-PINACA by both gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry. Both mass spectra of the test extracts coincided with those of the reference standards for each MS method. Diphenidine and 5-fluoro-AB-PINACA were quantitated in the herbal product by GC–MS using selected ion monitoring and the standard addition method. The content of diphenidine in the herbal product was as high as 289 ± 23.2 mg/g (n = 5); that of 5-fluoro-AB-PINACA was 55.5 ± 5.8 mg/g (n = 3). Diphenidine is known as an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor channel blocker. Although its human toxicity has not been studied, it is likely to have severe psychotropic action in humans. The very high content of diphenidine in the present herbal package should prompt law enforcement agencies to be aware of the potential harmful effects of diphenidine itself and also when consumed in combination with other drugs of abuse.     

Identification of (1-pentylindol-3-yl)-(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone and its 5-pentyl fluorinated analog in herbal incense seized for drug trafficking

Four herbal incense products were seized from suspected drug abusers in Korea. The major ingredients in the herbal incense samples were purified, and their structures were elucidated using gas chromatography–electron ionization–mass spectrometry (GC–EI–MS), liquid chromatography–time-of-flight–mass spectrometry (LC–TOF–MS), and 1D and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. As a result, ingredients in the herbal incense were identified as (1-pentylindol-3-yl)-(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone and its 5-pentyl fluorinated analog [1-(5-fluoropentyl)indol-3-yl]-(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone. The former is being sold via the Internet as a "research chemical" named UR-144, and the latter is sold as 5F-UR-144. UR-144 is a selective full agonist of CB₂ cannabinoid receptor, and was first developed by Abbott Laboratories as an analgesic. It exhibits analgesic activity against both neuropathic and inflammatory pain associated mainly with the CB₂ receptor, but shows less psychotropic effects associated with the CB₁ receptor. Fluorination of the N-pentyl side chain of cannabimimetic compounds increases their cannabinoid receptor affinity such as with AM-2201, which shows both increased analgesic and psychotropic effects simultaneously. UR-144 and 5F-UR-144 can be classified as research chemicals based on their analgesic effects, but in practice are abused as psychotropic agents and can cause unexpected toxic effects. Thus, the trade and diversion of these chemicals should be monitored carefully for possible abuse. To our knowledge, this is the first report disclosing cyclopropylcarbonylindoles in herbal products.     

Identification and quantitation of two cannabimimetic phenylacetylindoles JWH-251 and JWH-250, and four cannabimimetic naphthoylindoles JWH-081, JWH-015, JWH-200, and JWH-073 as designer drugs in illegal products

Six cannabimimetic indoles have been identified as adulterants in herbal or chemical products being sold illegally in Japan, with four of the compounds being new as adulterants to our knowledge. The identifications were based on analyses using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, high-resolution mass spectrometry, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The first two compounds were identified as phenylacetyl indoles JWH-251 (2-(2-methylphenyl)-1-(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)ethanone; 1) and its demethyl-methoxylated analog JWH-250 (2-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)ethanone; 2). Compound 2 was identical to that found as an adulterant in the UK and in Germany in 2009. The third compound was naphthoylindole JWH-081 (1-(4-methoxynaphthalenyl)-(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone; 3), and the fourth was JWH-073 (1-naphthalenyl(1-butyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone; 4), which had been identified as an adulterant in our previous study. Two additional compounds were JWH-015 (1-naphthalenyl(2-methyl-1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone; 5) and JWH-200 (1-naphthalenyl(1-(2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone; 6). Compounds 1–4 and 6 were reported to be synthetic cannabinoids with selective affinity for cannabinoid CB₁ receptors, while compound 5 was reported to be a selective CB₂ receptor agonist causing immunosuppressive effects without psychotropic affects. One product contained both CB₁ and CB₂ receptor agonists in our collection. Quantitative analyses of the six cannabimimetic compounds in 20 products revealed that there was large variation in concentrations of the detected compounds among products; for herbal cutting products, the total amounts of these cannabinoids ranged from 26 to 100 mg.     

Two new synthetic cannabinoids, AM-2201 benzimidazole analog (FUBIMINA) and (4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone (MEPIRAPIM), and three phenethylamine derivatives, 25H-NBOMe 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzyl analog, 25B-NBOMe, and 2C-N-NBOMe, identified in illegal products

Two new types of synthetic cannabinoids, an AM-2201 benzimidazole analog (FUBIMINA, 1) and (4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone (MEPIRAPIM, 2), and three newly emerged phenethylamine derivatives, 25B-NBOMe (3), 2C-N-NBOMe (4), and a 25H-NBOMe 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzyl analog (5), were detected in illegal products distributed in Japan. The identification was based on liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), high-resolution MS, and nuclear magnetic resonance analyses. Different from the representative synthetic cannabinoids, such as JWH-018, which have a naphthoylindole moiety, compounds 1 and 2 were completely new types of synthetic cannabinoids; compound 1 had a benzimidazole group in place of an indole group, and compound 2 had a 4-methylpiperazine group in place of the naphthyl group. Compounds 3 and 4 were N-o-methoxybenzyl derivatives of 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamines (25-NBOMe series), which had been previously detected in European countries, but have newly emerged in Japan. Compound 5 had an N-trimethoxybenzyl group in place of an N-o-methoxybenzyl group. Data on the chemistry and pharmacology of compounds 1, 2, and 5 have never been reported to our knowledge.     

Analysis of the prevalence and coexistence of synthetic cannabinoids in “herbal high” products in Poland

“Herbal highs” are a group of products marketed in recent years as legal substitutes for marijuana. This article presents the results of examinations performed on samples seized in “head shops” and from individuals during a 3.5-year period, between mid-2008 and the end of 2011 in Poland. Of over 2000 samples delivered for analysis, 420 preparations were selected for this study. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–quadrupole-time-of-flight–mass spectrometry were used for identification of psychoactive components, and high-performance liquid chromatography was used for their quantitation. The most common ingredients of herbal highs were: JWH-081 (144 products), JWH-018 (103), RCS-4 (92), JWH-073 (89), JWH-250 (75), JWH-122 (69), cannabicyclohexanol (55), and JWH-210 (38). Over 50 % of the products contained two or more active ingredients; 136 products (32.4 %) contained two; 56 products (13.3 %) contained three; and 22 (5.2 %) contained more than three. Common combinations of ingredients were investigated by the graph method; substances coexisted mainly with those introduced into the drug market in a similar period of time. The most common dual combinations were JWH-081 + RCS-4 (18 products), JWH-073 + JWH-250 (16), and JWH-081 + JWH-250 (12). JWH-081 was blended with almost all detected synthetic cannabinoids. The main risks of the use of these substances were due to ignorance of great variation in the content and composition of synthetic cannabinoids even if the products had identical labels. This inconsistency could cause serious health damage to users, while ignorance of the fact that more than one third of the products being sold at head shops contain illicit compound(s) could result in unexpected arrest.     

Identification and quantitation of two new naphthoylindole drugs-of-abuse, (1-(5-hydroxypentyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)(naphthalen-1-yl)methanone (AM-2202) and (1-(4-pentenyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)(naphthalen-1-yl)methanone, with other synthetic cannabinoids in unregulated “herbal” products circulated in the Tokyo area

During our continual surveillance of unregulated drugs in May–June 2011, we found two new compounds as adulterants in herbal products obtained at shops in the Tokyo area. These compounds were identified by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, accurate mass spectrometry, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The first compound identified was a naphthoylindole (1-(5-hydroxypentyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)(naphthalen-1-yl)methanone (AM-2202, 1), which is a side-chain hydroxyl analogue of JWH-018. The second compound was (1-(4-pentenyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)(naphthalen-1-yl)methanone (2), which is side-chain double bond analogue of JWH-018. This is the first report to identify 1 and 2 in a commercial “herbal” product to our knowledge. For quantitation of the above compounds 1 and 2, and chemical analysis for previously reported compounds (AM-2201, 3; JWH-203, 4; JWH-019, 7; JWH-210, 8; mitragynine, 9), each product was extracted with methanol under ultrasonication to prepare solutions for analysis by liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. For the sake of identifying JWH-203 (4) and its positional isomers [JWH-203-3-chloroisomer (5) and 4-chloroisomer (6)] correctly, simultaneous liquid chromatography analysis on fluorocarbon-bonded silica gel column was performed. And a case report of commercially available products containing synthetic cannabinoids 7 and 8, and a natural occurring alkaloid 9, was also shown. Each of 6 commercially circulated products contained compounds 1–4 and 7–9; the amounts of the compounds ranged from 4.1 to 222 mg per pack.     

Mass spectrometric differentiation of the isomers of mono-methoxyethylamphetamines and mono-methoxydimethylamphetamines by GC–EI–MS–MS

Mass spectrometric differentiation of the six isomers of mono-methoxyethylamphetamines (MeO-EAs) and mono-methoxydimethylamphetamines (MeO-DMAs) by gas chromatography–electron ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (GC–EI–MS–MS) was investigated. Based on their EI-mass spectra, the fragment ions at m/z 121 and 72 were selected as precursor ions for their regioisomeric and structurally isomeric differentiation, respectively. Collision-induced dissociation provides intensity differences in product ions among the isomers, enabling mass spectrometric differentiation of the isomers. Furthermore, high reproducibility of the product ion spectra at the optimized collision energy was confirmed, demonstrating the reliability of the method. To our knowledge, this is the first report on mass spectrometric differentiation of the six isomers of MeO-EAs and MeO-DMAs by GC–EI–MS–MS. Isomeric differentiation by GC–EI–MS–MS has a high potential to discriminate isomers of newly encountered designer drugs, making GC–MS–MS a powerful tool in the forensic toxicology field.     

Identification of a synthetic cannabinoid A-836339 as a novel compound found in a product

As a part of the work conducted in our laboratory, we encountered a case in which new chemical compound was contained in a certain product. This compound was found to have a molecular weight of 310 Da by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Accurate mass spectrometry measurements showed that the compound had an elemental composition of C₁₆H₂₆N₂O₂S. Using these mass data together with those obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance analysis and X-ray crystallographic analysis, this compound was identified as N-[3-(2-methoxyethyl)-4,5-dimethyl-2(3H)-thiazolylidene]-2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropanecarboxamide, which was reported in 2009 and named A-836339. It was described as a thiazol derivative and a selective agonist of G-protein-coupled cannabinoid receptor CB₂. This is the first report to identify this compound in a dubious product.     

Identification of a cannabimimetic indole as a designer drug in a herbal product

A cannabimimetic indole has been identified as a new adulterant in a herbal product being sold illegally in Japan for its expected narcotic effect. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses indicated that the product contained two major compounds. One was identified as a cannabinoid analog (1RS,3SR)-3-[4-(1,1-dimethyloctyl)-2-hydroxyphenyl]cyclohexan-1-ol (1) by direct comparison with the authentic compound, which we reported previously. The other compound (2) showed a molecular weight of 341 daltons, and accurate mass spectral measurements showed its elemental composition to be C₂₄H₂₃NO. Both mass and nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometric data revealed that 2 was 1-pentyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole [or naphthalen-1-yl-(1-pentylindol-3-yl)methanone] being identical to JWH-018, which was synthesized by Wiley and coworkers in 1998. This compound was reported as a potent cannabinoid receptor agonist possessing a pharmacological cannabimimetic activity.     

Characterization of the designer benzodiazepine pyrazolam and its detectability in human serum and urine

In 2012, online shops selling so-called research chemicals started offering pyrazolam, a new benzodiazepine that differs from phenazepam and etizolam, which have also recently appeared on the “gray market”, in that it is not marketed by pharmaceutical companies anywhere in the world. This article describes the characterization of pyrazolam (8-bromo-1-methyl-6-pyridin-2-yl-4H-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3–a][1, 4]benzodiazepine) using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS–MS), liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC–Q–TOF–MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In addition, a study was carried out in which one of the authors ingested two 0.5-mg pyrazolam tablets. Serum and urine samples were then obtained to investigate the metabolism of pyrazolam and to obtain preliminary results for the elimination half-life and the detectability of a 1-mg dose in serum and urine using a highly sensitive LC–MS–MS method and immunoassays. The results showed an elimination half-life of about 17 h and no detectable metabolism. The parent compound was detected with the described LC–MS–MS method in serum for more than 50 h and in urine for approximately 6 days. Immunoassays showed cross-reactivity, but poor detection in the study samples demonstrated that consumption or administration of this presumably potent drug could go undetected unless instrumental analytical techniques are also used.     

Identification of a new synthetic cannabinoid in a herbal mixture: 1-butyl-3-(2-methoxybenzoyl)indole

Two unknown cannabimimetic compounds were detected in a seized herbal mixture after gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) screening. To elucidate the chemical structures, 0.3 g of the dried plant material was extracted with methanol and concentrated under reduced pressure. The extract was purified by silica gel column chromatography with methylene chloride and methanol. Pure compounds were isolated by preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and then analyzed by electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry (MS) with direct flow injection, high-resolution ESI-time-of-flight (TOF)–MS and one-dimensional and two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. GC–MS spectra showed that the base ion at m/z 321 for compound 1 was the same as that of 1-pentyl-3-(4-methoxybenzoyl)indole (RCS-4), and the fragment ions were almost the same as those of RCS-4. The GC–MS spectrum of compound 2 was very similar to that of compound 1 except that the mass numbers of the fragment ions at m/z 290, 200, 186, and 173 of compound 2 were equally smaller than those of compound 1 by 14 amu. From these GC–MS results, compound 1 was assumed to be the 2- or 3-methoxy isomer of RCS-4, and compound 2 was assumed to be a 1-butylindole homologue of compound 1. The ESI mass spectra showed a single peak at m/z 322.33 for compound 1 and a single peak at m/z 308.25 for compound 2, which showed the masses of the protonated ions. High-resolution TOF–MS spectra showed the accurate mass numbers of protonated molecular ions at m/z 322.180512 for compound 1 and at m/z 308.164895 for compound 2, suggesting the molecular formulas of C₂₁H₂₃NO₂ and C₂₀H₂₁NO₂, respectively. The ¹H NMR spectra showed signals that suggested 23 and 21 protons for compounds 1 and 2, respectively, while the respective ¹³C NMR spectra showed 21 and 20 carbon signals. All protons and carbons were assigned by their couplings and correlations observed in ¹H–¹H correlation spectroscopy (COSY), ¹H–¹³C heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC), and ¹H–¹³C heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) spectra. On the basis of the spectral data, compound 1 was identified as the 2-methoxy isomer of RCS-4; compound 2 was identified for the first time as 1-butyl-3-(2-methoxybenzoyl)indole. Phenazepam and 5-methoxy-N,N-diallyltryptamine (5-MeO-DALT) were also identified as coexisting drugs in the herbal mixture. The contents of compounds 1 and 2 in the mixture were calculated to be 22.4 and 3.45 mg/g, respectively.     

Identification of N-ethyl-α-ethylphenethylamine in crystalline powder seized for suspected drug trafficking: a research chemical or a new designer drug?

A crystalline powder was found in an unclaimed lost article shipped from Vietnam to South Korea, and it was seized by narcotics agents as an item of suspicious trade. The chemical was suspected to be methamphetamine crystals, and was sent to the National Forensic Service for forensic identification. Elucidation of the chemical structure was carried out using gas chromatography–electron impact ionization–mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography–time-of-flight–mass spectrometry, and 1D and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The compound was identified as N-ethyl-α-ethylphenethylamine. Although the narcotic effect of this compound remains unverified, it may be classified as a phenethylamine-based designer drug on the basis of its structure. It appeared that the recipient of this article sought to abuse this chemical in the same way as amphetamines. There is a possibility that this chemical will be widely abused for recreational use in the near future.     

Differentiation of regioisomeric fluoroamphetamine analogs by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

In recent years, a large number of clandestinely produced controlled-substance analogs (designer drugs) of amphetamine with high structural variety have been detected in forensic samples. Analytical differentiation of regioisomers is a significant issue in forensic drug analysis because, in most cases, legal controls are placed only on one or two of the three isomers. In this study, we used gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) for the differentiation of regioisomers of fluoroamphetamine analogs (fluoroamphetamines and fluoromethamphetamines), which were synthesized in our laboratories. Free bases and their acylated and silylated derivatives were subjected to GC–MS analysis using DB-1ms, DB-5ms, and DB-17ms capillary columns. The separation of free bases was incomplete on all columns. Trifluoroacetyl derivatives of 3- and 4-positional isomers showed slight separation on DB-1ms and DB-5ms. On the other hand, trimethylsilyl derivatization enabled baseline separation of six fluoroamphetamine analogs on DB-1ms and DB-5ms columns, which was sufficient for unequivocal identification. For LC–MS/MS, a pentafluorophenyl column was able to separate six regioisomeric fluoroamphetamine analogs but a conventional C18 column could not achieve separation between 3- and 4-positional isomers. These results show that a suitable choice of derivatization and analytical columns allows the differentiation of regioisomeric fluoroamphetamine analogs.     

New cannabimimetic indazole derivatives, N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (AB-PINACA) and N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (AB-FUBINACA) identified as designer drugs in illegal products

Two new cannabimimetic indazole derivatives, N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (AB-PINACA, 1) and N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (AB-FUBINACA, 2), have been identified as designer drugs in illegal products. These identifications were based on liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, high-resolution mass spectrometry, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Because there have been neither chemical nor pharmacological data about compound 1 until now, this is the first report of this compound. Compound 2 was reported as a potent cannabinoid CB₁ receptor modulator when synthesized by Pfizer in 2009; but this is the first report of its detection in illegal products.