Menstruation recovery after chemotherapy and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist plus tamoxifen therapy for premenopausal patients with breast cancer

Purpose  

Little is known about the period required for menstruation recovery after long-term luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist plus tamoxifen therapy following chemotherapy. In this study we investigated the period required for menstruation recovery after the therapy.     

乳腺癌内分泌治疗中三苯氧胺耐药机制的研究进展

乳腺癌内分泌治疗的耐药性影响乳腺癌治疗效果及预后,近年来对耐药性的研究越来越深入,笔者从雌激素受体,内皮生长因子受体及信号传导分子几方面对其耐药性机制进行综述.     

Effect of tamoxifen on breast tissue density in premenopausal breast cancer

It has been established that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) increases breast tissue density on mammography in up to 30% of women receiving treatment. The effects of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) on breast tissue have received limited attention, although there have been several reports of tamoxifen decreasing mammographic tissue density in some women undergoing adjuvant or prophylactic breast cancer treatment. We report a case of a premenopausal woman treated with tamoxifen for 5 years whose mammographic density decreased while on tamoxifen and returned to her baseline density following termination of the drug. A regression of breast tissue may be reflective of sensitivity to tamoxifen and possibly, indicative of therapeutic benefit associated with treatment. Furthermore, induction of a more radiolucent pattern by tamoxifen may independently benefit women by enhancing mammographic detection. The clinical significance of resumption of a dense breast pattern following discontinuation of tamoxifen remains to be determined.     

Ovarian reserve in premenopausal women with breast cancer

BackgroundAs a special reproductive hormone and ovarian reserve indicator, the role of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in premenopausal women with breast cancer deserves further study.MethodsWe conducted an in-depth analysis of the data from the EGOFACT study (NCT02518191), a phase Ⅲ, randomized, controlled trial involving premenopausal female breast cancer patients in two parallel groups: chemotherapy with or without gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHa). Three hundred thirty premenopausal women aged 25–49 years with operable stage I to III breast cancer were included in this study. The characteristics of ovarian reserve changes marked by AMH in the EGOFACT study and the factors affecting ovarian function in premenopausal women with breast cancer were analyzed.ResultsThe AMH level of the chemotherapy alone group decreased gradually within one year, while the AMH level of the GnRHa group was significantly higher as early as 6 months after chemotherapy and recovered to close to the baseline level 12 months after chemotherapy (F = 34.991, P < 0.001). Correlation analysis showed that the factors affecting AMH levels mainly included age, menarche age, body mass index (BMI), reproductive history, baseline follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level, pathological stage and GnRHa application, but they had different effects on the incidence of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) at different periods. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that menarche age younger than 14 years (OR 0.470 [0.259, 0.852], P = 0.013), baseline AMH level higher than 0.5 ng/mL (OR 9.590 [3.366, 27.320], P < 0.001), pathological stage Ⅰ(OR 0.315 [0.124, 0.798], P = 0.015) and GnRHa application (OR 0.090 [0.045, 0.183], P < 0.001) were independent factors conducive to protection of ovarian reserve, as well as to recovery of ovarian reserve.ConclusionsAge, menarche age, baseline AMH level, and GnRHa application are the most important influencing factors for ovarian reserve in premenopausal women with breast cancer.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02518191, registered on Aug 5, 2015.     

Indications for primary tamoxifen therapy in elderly women with breast cancer.

A group of 66 elderly women with primary breast cancer were treated with tamoxifen and followed for a minimum of 2 years. Of these, 32 whose disease remained controlled for the 2-year period were considered to have had a 'worthwhile' response, 27 in whom disease progressed were considered to have had an unsatisfactory result and seven opted for alternative treatment. By Union Internacional Contra la Cancrum (UICC) criteria, 14 women had a complete response, 20 a partial response, in five disease remained static and in 20 it progressed without response. Prediction of outcome after assessment according to UICC criteria at 3 and 6 months was unsatisfactory (19 and 34 of 59 correctly predicted respectively). Analysis of multiple tumour measurements over 12 weeks was no better (33 of 59 correctly predicted). Immunocytochemical assay of fine-needle aspirates for oestrogen receptor (ER) provided a better predictor (38 of 47 correct) and the difference in survival between patients with and without ER activity was significant (P < 0.001). Conventional assessments of response at 3 and 6 months are unsatisfactory for judging the long-term benefit to the patient. ER status is the best predictor of response and outcome.     

Adjuvant endocrine therapy for perimenopausal women with early breast cancer

Adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) improves outcomes in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer compared with tamoxifen. However, AIs should not be used in premenopausal women because they can paradoxically increase estrogen secretion and may therefore stimulate tumor progression. In perimenopausal women undergoing treatment for breast cancer, it can be difficult to determine true menopausal status because adjuvant chemotherapy, tamoxifen, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues can induce transient (or permanent) ovarian suppression. How can one determine whether these women are truly postmenopausal and therefore candidates for AI therapy? A panel of experts in the field of endocrine therapy in breast cancer met in Dubrovnik, Croatia, on October 23, 2006, to discuss this clinical dilemma. This report summarizes the conclusions and recommendations that arose from this discussion.     

A luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist plus an aromatase inhibitor as second-line endocrine therapy in premenopausal females with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer

Purpose

The aim of the current study was to explore the efficacy and safety of combination therapy using a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as second-line therapy in premenopausal females with hormone receptor (HR)-positive recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients registered in the breast cancer database of our institution between January 2001 and December 2012. The breast cancer database identified 14 premenopausal patients who had been treated with an LHRH agonist plus AI for HR-positive recurrent or MBC.

Results

Fourteen patients with recurrent breast cancer (N = 10) or metastatic disease at primary diagnosis (N = 4) were included in the present study. All patients had previously been treated with an LHRH agonist plus tamoxifen. The clinical benefit rate was 71.4 % and the median TTP was 11 months (95 % confidence interval 1.7–20.3 months). One patient discontinued treatment because of liver dysfunction (grade 3).

Conclusions

The combination of an LHRH agonist plus an AI is a treatment option for premenopausal females with HR-positive MBC that can prolong the chemotherapy-free interval and yield effective disease stabilization.     

Relationship between mammographic breast density and tamoxifen in women with breast cancer

Previous studies have reported that tamoxifen use is associated with a decrease in mammographic breast density. This is a potentially valuable finding since mammographic sensitivity is limited by breast density. Anything that reduces breast density would theoretically enhance the sensitivity of mammography for the detection of breast cancer in women at an earlier stage when it is more curable. We performed a retrospective study investigating the potential effect of tamoxifen on breast density. The data for this retrospective study were collected from the records of 52 charts from a single medical oncologist. Patients with breast cancer were selected regardless of stage or age at the time of diagnosis or treatment, as long as their charts had records of bilateral mammograms. For each breast on each woman, both mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal views were reviewed independently by two radiologists on two separate occasions to obtain inter- and intraobserver variability. Two methods of classifying breast density were used: the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), and measurements of percent density. Only age and menopausal status were found to be associated with breast density. There was no correlation between breast density and tamoxifen use (past or present). Our study shows no association between tamoxifen use and breast density. We confirm previous observations that breast density is inversely correlated with age and postmenopausal status.     

Addition of adjuvant tamoxifen to cyclophosphamide,methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil for premenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: To study the value of adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) in premenopausal women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer who received adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) polychemotherapy. METHODS: Four hundred and two premenopausal ER-positive breast cancer patients who received CMF chemotherapy between January 1990 and December 1999 were retrospectively studied. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were used to evaluate the clinical value of TAM therapy. The relationships between nodal status and TAM were also analysed. RESULTS: After a mean of 41 months of follow-up, 43 (13.7%) patients died of breast cancer and 68 (19.9%) patients suffered recurrence. There was a significant difference between TAM and non-TAM treatment groups for DFS (p=0.0058), but no significant difference for OS. For node-negative patients, there was no significant difference between the TAM and non-TAM treatment groups for either DFS or OS. For node-positive patients, the difference between TAM and non-TAM treatment groups was significant for both DFS and OS (p=0.0497 and p=0.0285, respectively). CONCLUSION: TAM resulted in additional benefit to premenopausal patients with node-positive ER-positive breast cancer who received the CMF polychemotherapy regimen.     

芳香化酶抑制剂新辅助内分泌治疗三苯氧胺耐药的老年性局部晚期乳腺癌的研究

目的探讨芳香抑制剂新辅助内分泌治疗三苯氧胺耐药的老年性局部晚期乳腺癌的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析既往接受三苯氧胺新辅助内分泌治疗失败,后改用芳香化酶抑制剂,且能够评估疗效和记录疾病进展时间的41例老年性局部晚期乳腺癌患者,主要观察终点为临床获益率（Clinical benefit rate,CBR）。结果分别接受阿那曲唑（n=16）、伊西美坦（n=14）和来曲唑（n=11）新辅助内分泌治疗的三组乳腺癌患者的临床病理特征相似（χ2=1.579,P=0.547）,不同的芳香化酶抑制剂均能获得明显改善三苯氧胺治疗失败的老年性局部晚期乳腺癌的治疗效果,其CBR分别为阿那曲唑62.5%,伊西美坦78.57%和来曲唑72.73%,治疗效果相似（χ2=3.787,P=0.327）。结论芳香化酶抑制剂新辅助内分泌治疗三苯氧胺耐药的老年性局部晚期乳腺癌,仍可以获得明显的临床缓解,且不同的芳香化酶抑制剂的CBR相似。     

Inclusion of premenopausal women in breast cancer clinical trials

BackgroundPatients with premenopausal breast cancer (PMBC) have been historically excluded from some clinical trials because of the limitations of using endocrine therapy (ET) in this population. We analyzed breast cancer randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to determine the rates of and factors associated with inclusion of PMBC patients to provide a benchmark for PMBC inclusion in RCTs moving forward.MethodsUsing ClinicalTrials.Gov, we identified breast cancer phase III RCTs and extracted inclusion criteria and patient enrollment information. Multiple binary logistic regression modeling was used to assess trial-related factors that were associated with PMBC patient inclusion.ResultsOf 170 breast cancer RCTs identified, 131 (77.1%) included PMBC patients. Sixty-five (38.2%) trials analyzed patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, of which 31 (47.7%) allowed for enrollment of PMBC patients. Lower rates of PMBC inclusion were seen in trials that studied HR+/HER2-patients (47.7% PMBC inclusion in HR+/HER2-trials vs. 94.3% in non-HR+/HER2-trials, aOR 0.07 [95% CI: 0.02–0.19], p < 0.001) and in trials that randomized or mandated ET (44.4% in ET trials vs. 83.2% in non-ET trials, aOR 0.21 [95% CI: 0.10–0.83], p = 0.02). Trials studying chemotherapy (CT) were associated with inclusion of PMBC patients (100% in CT trials vs. 70.5% in non-CT trials, a OR 14.02 [95% CI: 1.54–127.91], p = 0.01). All surgical and radiation therapy clinical trials allowed for the inclusion of PMBC patients in their eligibility criteria.ConclusionsBreast cancer clinical trials should carefully select their enrollment criteria and consider inclusion of premenopausal patients when appropriate.     

The effect of adjuvant therapy with or without tamoxifen on the endocrine function of patients with breast cancer

The ovarian and pituitary functions of 64 operable breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen were investigated. The post menopausal patients, divided into 3 treatment groups, one with tamoxifen alone, one with tamoxifen and chemotherapy and the other with chemotherapy alone had serum estradiol 17-β (E2) and progesterone levels lower than the evaluable limits. Although there was no significant difference in the level of estrone sulfate (E1-S) between these three groups, the level of lutainizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) in the patients treated with tamoxifen alone and tamoxifen and chemotherapy were significantly lower than those treated with chemotherapy alone. The decrease in gonadotropin levels induced by tamoxifen treatment was reversible as it appeared after the initiation of tamoxifen and recovered after its cessation. In the premenopausal patients, a group treated with tamoxifen and chemotherapy had significantly higher E1-S, E2 and progesterone levels and significantly lower gonadotropin levels than a group treated with chemotherapy alone or one treated with a cyclophosphamide regimen. These increases in the levels of estrogen and progesterone were also reversible, and induced by tamoxifen. Thus, adjuvant endocrinochemotherapy causes profound alteration in the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis and therefore, monitoring a variety of hormonal levels is thought to be necessary for assessing the consequences of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients, especially in premenopausal patients using tamoxifen.     

The effect of adjuvant therapy with or without tamoxifen on the endocrine function of patients with breast cancer

The ovarian and pituitary functions of 64 operable breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen were investigated. The post menopausal patients, divided into 3 treatment groups, one with tamoxifen alone, one with tamoxifen and chemotherapy and the other with chemotherapy alone had serum estradiol 17-beta (E2) and progesterone levels lower than the evaluable limits. Although there was no significant difference in the level of estrone sulfate (E1-S) between these three groups, the level of lutainizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) in the patients treated with tamoxifen alone and tamoxifen and chemotherapy were significantly lower than those treated with chemotherapy alone. The decrease in gonadotropin levels induced by tamoxifen treatment was reversible as it appeared after the initiation of tamoxifen and recovered after its cessation. In the premenopausal patients, a group treated with tamoxifen and chemotherapy had significantly higher E1-S, E2 and progesterone levels and significantly lower gonadotropin levels than a group treated with chemotherapy alone or one treated with a cyclophosphamide regimen. These increases in the levels of estrogen and progesterone were also reversible, and induced by tamoxifen. Thus, adjuvant endocrinochemotherapy causes profound alteration in the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis and therefore, monitoring a variety of hormonal levels is thought to be necessary for assessing the consequences of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients, especially in premenopausal patients using tamoxifen.     

Prognostic and predictive value of TFF1 for adjuvant endocrine therapy in Chinese women with early ER positive breast cancer: Comparing aromatase inhibitors with tamoxifen

Factors that predict in favor of an aromatase inhibitors (AIs) over tamoxifen (TAM) in estrogen receptor (ER) breast cancer remains to be identified. We compared progesterone receptor (PR) and trefoil factor 1 (TTF1) status (+ve versus −ve) as predictive of superior effect of AI’s over tamoxifen among a total of 1973 Chinese women with early ER+ breast cancer. The expression of TFF1 was independently associated with ER and PR. However, there was no correlation with TFF1 and HER-2 expression. Treatment effect was more pronounced in the ER+/TFF1+ postmenopausal patients with a hazard ratio favoring AIs (HR = 0.397, 95%CI 0.183-0.860), but not in the PR positive cohorts (HR = 0.466, 95%CI 0.186-1.164). We suggested that AIs was better than TAM especially in the postmenopausal patients with ER+/TFF1+ breast cancer; however the clinical application of this observation still requires further prospective studies.     

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer

The clinical benefits of endocrine therapy for patients with hormonosensitive breast cancer are well established. For many years, five years' treatment with tamoxifen was the gold standard of adjuvant treatment. The recent development of new endocrine agents provides physicians with the opportunity to take a more effective therapeutic approach. Nevertheless, the success of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is much more recent and less frequently reported in the literature. This article reviews the studies published on neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors). According to the literature, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy seems to be effective and well tolerated. The newer generation of aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane) appear to result in better overall response rates and more conservative surgery than tamoxifen. Patients with an ER Allred score of 6 and over are most likely to respond and gain clinical benefit. The optimal duration of neoadjuvant therapy has not yet been investigated in detail. These preliminary results are interesting and should be confirmed by further studies.     

Effect of long-acting LHRH analog (Zoladex) on prostate cancer: evaluated by transrectal ultrasonography

Transrectal ultrasonography has proved valuable in assessing the effect of primary treatment modalities for prostate carcinoma. This study shows patients who had a significant reduction in primary tumor volume had a significantly better prognosis and had less local symptoms than did the group of patients that did not have a significant reduction (less than 50%) in primary volume secondary to therapy. Patients were treated with either castration or Zoladex and all had Stage D2 cancer of the prostate.     

Comparison of LHRH analogue (Zoladex) with orchiectomy in patients with metastatic prostatic carcinoma.

Between November 1983 and February 1986, 358 patients with previously untreated metastatic prostatic carcinoma entered a multicentre, randomised trial in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, in which the LHRH analogue Zoladex (ICI Pharmaceuticals PLC), administered subcutaneously every 28 days, was compared with orchiectomy. Both treatments were equally effective in lowering serum testosterone concentrations to within the surgically castrate range and this was accompanied by equivalent subjective and objective response rates and times to treatment failure. At a median follow-up of 2 years there was no difference in overall survival, confirming that Zoladex is an effective medical alternative to orchiectomy in patients with metastatic disease.     

Clinical effects of a 3-month formulation LH-RH agonist (Zoladex LA 10.8 mg depot) in patients with prostate cancer]

Pharmacodynamics (PD), anti-tumor effects, safety and pharmacokinetics of a 3-month formulation of goserelin (Zoladex LA 10.8 mg depot: "10.8 mg depot") were investigated in a collaborative multicenter study. Study participants were 40 Japanese patients with prostate cancer comprising 20 untreated patients and 20 switch patients who had been receiving Zoladex 3.6 mg depot for 3 months or longer. Serum testosterone levels, serum LH levels, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and drug concentrations were measured until 12 weeks after a single subcutaneous dose of 10.8 mg depot. Anti-tumor effects were evaluated by means of changes in the tumor lesions and the PSA levels at 12 weeks. After administration to the untreated patients, 10.8 mg depot reduced serum testosterone to the castrate range within 4 weeks and the reduction was maintained for up to 12 weeks. In the switch patients, serum testosterone suppression that had been produced by previous treatment with Zoladex 3.6 mg depot was maintained for up to 12 weeks following 10.8 mg depot administration. The anti-tumor effect at 12 weeks was 90.0% including partial response cases. The ratio of PSA normalization at 12 weeks was 75.0%. Fifty-seven adverse reactions were observed in 27 of the 40 patients (67.5%), but none were clinically significant. Although a disease flare presented as urinary retention in 1 of the untreated patients, all patients completed the study. Serum goserelin was detected up to 12 weeks after the administration of 10.8 mg depot. In conclusion a single dose of 10.8 mg depot showed a satisfactory PD-effect and brought about clinical efficacy persisting for at least 12 weeks and was well tolerated in patients with prostate cancer.     

三苯氧胺治疗乳腺癌对子宫内膜的影响

三苯氧胺是一种有效的广泛应用于治疗乳腺癌的辅助性内分泌药物,它的抗雌激素作用用于治疗乳腺癌,而其雌激素作用可能引起子宫内膜病变。本文对三苯氧胺的作用机制、对子宫内膜的影响及发生子宫内膜病变后的诊治情况做一综述。