Donor Fas Is Not Necessary for T‐Cell‐Mediated Rejection of Mouse Kidney Allografts

It is important to resolve whether T‐cell‐mediated rejection (TCMR) is mediated by contact‐dependent cytotoxicity or by contact‐independent inflammatory mechanisms. We recently showed that the cytotoxic molecules perforin and granzymes A and B are not required for TCMR of mouse kidney transplants. Nevertheless, TCMR could still be mediated by cytotoxicity via Fas on donor cells engaging Fas ligand on host T cells. We examined whether the diagnostic TCMR lesions would be abrogated if donor Fas was absent, particularly in hosts deficient in perforin or granzymes A and B. Kidneys from Fas‐deficient donors transplanted into major histocompatibility complex (MHC)‐ mismatched hosts developed tubulitis and diffuse interstitial infiltration indistinguishable from wild‐type (WT) allografts, even in hosts deficient in perforin and granzymes A and B. Gene expression analysis revealed similar molecular disturbances in Fas‐deficient and WT allografts at day 21 transplanted into WT, perforin and granzyme A/B‐deficient hosts, indicating epithelial injury and dedifferentiation. Thus, donor Fas is not necessary for TCMR diagnostic lesions or molecular changes, even in the absence of perforin–granzyme mechanisms. We propose that in TCMR, interstitial effector T cells mediate parenchymal injury by inflammatory mechanisms that require neither the perforin–granzyme nor the Fas–Fas ligand cytotoxic mechanisms.     

IFN-γ is an Absolute Requirement for Spontaneous Acceptance of Liver Allografts

Experimental liver allografts undergo spontaneous acceptance despite undergoing rejection during the first few weeks post transplant. We explored the role of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) in the spontaneous acceptance of mouse liver allografts. Strain of mouse (CBA) liver allografts transplanted into normal BALB/c mice developed histologic changes typical of rejection that spontaneously regressed, permitting long-term survival of these allografts similar to that of syngeneic grafts. In contrast, CBA liver allografts in IFN-gamma-deficient hosts manifested not only infiltration but also hemorrhage and necrosis, with no survival beyond 14 days. Despite differences in survival, local expression of cytotoxic T-cell genes in the transplant was not increased in IFN-gamma-deficient hosts, but livers in interferon-gamma-deficient mice (GKO) hosts displayed much less induction of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II expression. To determine whether the difference in survival was secondary to the direct effects of IFN-gamma on the liver, we transplanted livers from IFN-gamma-receptor-deficient mice into normal hosts. Liver allografts lacking IFN-gamma receptors also developed hemorrhage and necrosis with minimal induction of MHC expression. Thus IFN-gamma mediates a direct effect on rejecting liver allografts that reduces hemorrhage and necrosis, induces MHC expression, and is absolutely required for spontaneous acceptance.     

T Cell‐mediated Rejection of Kidney Transplants: A Personal Viewpoint

In kidney allografts, T cell mediated rejection (TCMR) is characterized by infiltration of the interstitium by T cells and macrophages, intense IFNG and TGFB effects, and epithelial deterioration. Recent experimental and clinical studies provide the basis for a provisional model for TCMR. The model proposes that the major unit of cognate recognition in TCMR is effector T cells engaging donor antigen on macrophages. This event creates the inflammatory compartment that recruits effector and effector memory CD4 and CD8 T cells, both cognate and noncognate, and macrophage precursors. Cognate T cells cross the donor microcirculation to enter the interstitium but spare the microcirculation. Local inflammation triggers dedifferentiation of the adjacent epithelium (e.g. loss of transporters and expression of embryonic genes) rather than cell death, via mechanisms that do not require known T‐cell cytotoxic mechanisms or direct contact of T cells with the epithelium. Local epithelial changes trigger a response of the entire nephron and a second wave of dedifferentiation. The dedifferentiated epithelium is unable to exclude T cells, which enter to produce tubulitis lesions. Thus TCMR is a cognate recognition‐based process that creates local inflammation and epithelial dedifferentiation, stereotyped nephron responses, and tubulitis, and if untreated causes irreversible nephron loss.     

Tubulitis and Epithelial Cell Alterations in Mouse Kidney Transplant Rejection Are Independent of CD103, Perforin or Granzymes A/B

One of the defining lesions of kidney allograft rejection is epithelial deterioration and invasion by inflammatory cells (tubulitis). We examined epithelial changes and their relationship to effector T cells and to CD103/E-cadherin interactions in mouse kidney allografts. Rejecting allografts showed interstitial mononuclear infiltration from day 5. Loss of epithelial mass, estimated by tubular surface area, and tubulitis were minimal through day 7 and severe by day 21. Tubules in day 21 allografts manifested severe reduction of E-cadherin and Ksp-cadherin by immunostaining with redistribution to the apical membrane, indicating loss of polarity. By flow cytometry T cells isolated from allografts were 25% CD103+. Laser capture microdissection and RT-PCR showed increased CD103 mRNA in the interstitium and tubules. However, allografts in hosts lacking CD103 developed tubulitis, cadherin loss, and epithelial deterioration similar to wild-type hosts. The loss of cadherins and epithelial mass was also independent of perforin and granzymes A and B. Thus rejection is characterized by severe tubular deterioration associated with CD103+ T cells but not mediated by CD103/cadherin interactions or granzyme-perforin cytotoxic mechanisms. We suggest that alloimmune effector T cells mediate epithelial injury by contact-independent mechanisms related to delayed type hypersensitivity, followed by invasion of the altered epithelium to produce tubulitis.     

Role of Natural Killer Cell Subsets in Cardiac Allograft Rejection

To achieve donor-specific immune tolerance to allogeneic organ transplants, it is imperative to understand the cell types involved in acute allograft rejection. In wild-type mice, CD4(+) T cells are necessary and sufficient for acute rejection of cardiac allografts. However, when T-cell responses are suboptimal, such as in mice treated with costimulation-targeting agents or in CD28-deficient mice, and perhaps in transplanted patients taking immunosuppressive drugs, the participation of other lymphocytes such as CD8(+) T cells and NK1.1(+) cells becomes apparent. We found that host NK but not NKT cells were required for cardiac rejection. Ly49G2(+) NK cells suppressed rejection, whereas a subset of NK cells lacking inhibitory Ly49 receptors for donor MHC class I molecules was sufficient to promote rejection. Notably, rejection was independent of the activating receptors Ly49D and NKG2D. Finally, our experiments supported a mechanism by which NK cells promote expansion and effector function of alloreactive T cells. Thus, therapies aimed at specific subsets of NK cells may facilitate transplantation tolerance in settings of impaired T-cell function.     

Kidney Transplant Outcomes for Prior Living Organ Donors

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network gives priority in kidney allocation to prior live organ donors who require a kidney transplant. In this study, we analyzed the effect of this policy on facilitating access to transplantation for prior donors who were wait-listed for kidney transplantation in the United States. Using 1:1 propensity score–matching methods, we assembled two matched cohorts. The first cohort consisted of prior organ donors and matched nondonors who were wait-listed during the years 1996–2010. The second cohort consisted of prior organ donors and matched nondonors who underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation. During the study period, there were 385,498 listings for kidney transplantation, 252 of which were prior donors. Most prior donors required dialysis by the time of listing (64% versus 69% among matched candidates; P=0.24). Compared with matched nondonors, prior donors had a higher rate of deceased donor transplant (85% versus 33%; P<0.001) and a lower median time to transplantation (145 versus 1607 days; P<0.001). Prior donors received higher-quality allografts (median kidney donor risk index 0.67 versus 0.90 for nondonors; P<0.001) and experienced lower post-transplant mortality (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.08 to 0.46; P<0.001) than matched nondonors. In conclusion, these data suggest that prior organ donors experience brief waiting time for kidney transplant and receive excellent-quality kidneys, but most need pretransplant dialysis. Individuals who are considering live organ donation should be provided with this information because this allocation priority will remain in place under the new US kidney allocation system.     

Induction of Cardiac Allograft Tolerance Across a Full MHC Barrier in Miniature Swine by Donor Kidney Cotransplantation

We have previously shown that tolerance of kidney allografts across a full major histocompatibility complex (MHC) barrier can be induced in miniature swine by a 12‐day course of high‐dose tacrolimus. However, that treatment did not prolong survival of heart allografts across the same barrier. We have now tested the effect of cotransplanting an allogeneic heart and kidney from the same MHC‐mismatched donor using the same treatment regimen. Heart allografts (n = 3) or heart plus kidney allografts (n = 5) were transplanted into MHC‐mismatched recipients treated with high‐dose tacrolimus for 12 days. As expected, all isolated heart allografts rejected by postoperative day 40. In contrast, heart and kidney allografts survived for >200 days with no evidence of rejection on serial cardiac biopsies. Heart/kidney recipients lost donor‐specific responsiveness in cell‐mediated lympholysis and mixed‐lymphocyte reaction assays, were free of alloantibody and exhibited prolonged survival of donor, but not third‐party skin grafts. Late (>100 days) removal of the kidney allografts did not cause acute rejection of the heart allografts (n = 2) and did not abrogate donor‐specific unresponsiveness in vitro. While kidney‐induced cardiac allograft tolerance (KICAT) has previously been demonstrated across a Class I disparity, these data demonstrate that this phenomenon can also be observed across the more clinically relevant full MHC mismatch. Elucidating the renal element(s) responsible for KICAT could provide mechanistic information relevant to the induction of tolerance in recipients of isolated heart allografts as well as other tolerance‐resistant organs.     

Effects of Donor Age and Cell Senescence on Kidney Allograft Survival

The biological processes responsible for somatic cell senescence contribute to organ aging and progression of chronic diseases, and this may contribute to kidney transplant outcomes. We examined the effect of pre-existing donor aging on the performance of kidney transplants, comparing mouse kidney isografts and allografts from old versus young donors. Before transplantation, old kidneys were histologically normal, but displayed an increased expression of senescence marker p16 ^INK4a . Old allografts at day 7 showed a more rapid emergence of epithelial changes and a further increase in the expression of p16 ^INK4a . Similar but much milder changes occurred in old isografts. These changes were absent in young allografts at day 7, but emerged by day 21. The expression of p16 ^INK4a remained low in young kidney allografts at day 7, but increased with severe rejection at day 21. Isografts from young donors showed no epithelial changes and no increase in p16 ^INK4a . The measurements of the alloimmune response—infiltrate, cytology, expression of perforin, granzyme B, IFN-γ and MHC—were not increased in old allografts. Thus, old donor kidneys display abnormal parenchymal susceptibility to transplant stresses and enhanced induction of senescence marker p16 ^INK4a , but were not more immunogenic. These data are compatible with a key role of somatic cell senescence mechanisms in kidney transplant outcomes by contributing to donor aging, being accelerated by transplant stresses, and imposing limits on the capacity of the tissue to proliferate.     

En Bloc Liver Kidney Transplantation Using Donor Splenic Artery as Inflow to the Kidney: Report of Two Cases

The number of simultaneous liver–kidney transplants has been increasing. This surgery is associated with an increased risk of complications, longer duration of surgery and longer ischemia time for the renal allograft. Two patients listed for liver–kidney transplant at our center underwent en bloc combined liver–kidney transplantation using donor splenic artery as inflow. Patient 1 previously underwent cardiac catheterization that was complicated by a bleeding pseudoaneurysm of the right external iliac artery that required endovascular stenting of the external iliac artery and embolization of the inferior epigastric artery. Patient 2 was on vasopressor support and continuous renal replacement therapy at the time of transplant. In this paper, we described a novel technique of en bloc liver–kidney transplant with simultaneous reperfusion of both allografts using the donor splenic artery for renal inflow. This technique is useful for decreasing cold ischemia time and total operative time by simultaneous reperfusion of both allografts. It is a useful technical variant that can be used in patients with severe disease of the iliac arteries.     

Overcoming a Positive Crossmatch in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation

Many patients who have an otherwise acceptable living-kidney donor do not undergo transplantation because of the presence of antibodies against the donor cells resulting in a positive crossmatch. In the current study, 14 patients with a positive cytotoxic crossmatch (titer 相似文献   

Multiorgan transplantation from a deceased donor with intravascular diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: transmission of the disease and results of treatment

This report presents the transplantation of two kidneys and the liver from a deceased donor with suspected autoimmune encephalomeningitis (ADEM). Due to an atypical post‐transplantation clinical course, the transplanted kidneys were biopsied and this disclosed diffuse large B‐cell (DLBC) lymphoma of the intravascular type in each kidney. The same malignancy was found in the postmortem donor brain examination. The renal allografts from the two recipients were removed: despite every effort, one patient died, while chemotherapy was successful in the second. No malignancy was observed in the liver transplant recipient, who received prophylactic chemotherapy. These cases highlight the occasional failure of organ donor disease screening and the consequent unforeseen complications.     

The Indirect Alloresponse Impairs the Induction but Not Maintenance of Tolerance to MHC Class I-Disparate Allografts

We studied the effects of indirect allorecognition on the induction and maintenance phases of tolerance in miniature swine cotransplanted with heart and kidney allografts. MHC class I-mismatched heart and kidney grafts were cotransplanted in recipients receiving CyA for 12 days. Recipients were unimmunized or immunized with a set of donor-derived or control third-party MHC class I peptides either 21 days prior to transplantation or over 100 days after transplantation. T-cell proliferation, delayed type hypersensitivity reaction (DTH) and antibody production were assessed. All animals injected with donor MHC class I peptides developed potent indirect alloresponses specific to the immunizing peptides. While untreated recipients developed stable tolerance, all animals preimmunized with donor allopeptides rejected kidney–heart transplants acutely. In contrast, when peptide immunization was delayed until over 100 days after kidney–heart transplantation, no effects were observed on graft function or in vitro measures of alloimmunity. Donor peptide immunization prevented tolerance when administered to recipients pre transplantation but did not abrogate tolerance when administered to long-term survivors post transplantation. This suggests that the presence of T cells activated via indirect allorecognition represent a barrier to the induction but not the maintenance of tolerance.     

Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate (HTK) Is Associated with Reduced Graft Survival of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants

Single-center studies have reported equivalent outcomes of kidney allografts recovered with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) or University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. However, these studies were likely underpowered and often unadjusted, and multicenter studies have suggested HTK preservation might increase delayed graft function (DGF) and reduce graft survival of renal allografts. To further inform clinical practice, we analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database of deceased donor kidney transplants performed from July 2004 to February 2008 to determine if HTK (n = 5728) versus UW (n = 15 898) preservation impacted DGF or death-censored graft survival. On adjusted analyses, HTK preservation had no effect on DGF (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, p = 0.7) but was associated with an increased risk of death-censored graft loss (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, p = 0.008). The detrimental effect of HTK was a relatively late one, with a strong association between HTK and subsequent graft loss in those surviving beyond 12 months (HR 1.43, p = 0.007). Interestingly, a much stronger effect was seen in African-American recipients (HR 1.55, p = 0.024) than in Caucasian recipients (HR 1.18, p = 0.5). Given recent studies that also demonstrate that HTK preservation reduces liver and pancreas allograft survival, we suggest that the use of HTK for abdominal organ recovery should be reconsidered.     

Recipient Outcomes Following Transplantation of Allografts From Live Kidney Donors Who Subsequently Developed End‐Stage Renal Disease

Live kidney donors have an increased risk of end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) compared with nondonors; however, it is unknown whether undetected, subclinical kidney disease exists at donation that subsequently contributes to this risk. To indirectly test this hypothesis, the authors followed the donated kidneys, by comparing the outcomes of 257 recipients whose donors subsequently developed ESRD with a matched cohort whose donors remained ESRD free. The compared recipients were matched on donor (age, sex, race/ethnicity, donor–recipient relationship), transplant (HLA mismatch, peak panel‐reactive antibody, previous transplantation, year of transplantation), and recipient (age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index, cause of ESRD, and time on dialysis) risk factors. Median recipient follow‐up was 12.5 years (interquartile range 7.4–17.9, maximum 20 years). Recipients of allografts from donors who developed ESRD had increased death‐censored graft loss (74% versus 56% at 20 years; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5–2.0; p < 0.001) and mortality (61% versus 46% at 20 years; aHR 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8; p < 0.001) compared with matched recipients of allografts from donors who did not develop ESRD. This association was similar among related, spousal, and unrelated nonspousal donors. These findings support a novel view of the mechanisms underlying donor ESRD: that of pre‐donation kidney disease. However, biopsy data may be required to confirm this hypothesis.     

Interleukin-18 Affects Local Cytokine Expression But Does Not Impact on the Development of Kidney Allograft Rejection

Interleukin-18 is predominantly a macrophage-derived cytokine with a key role in inflammation and cell-mediated immunity. Having previously demonstrated IL-18 upregulation in a rat model of kidney rejection, here we examined IL-18 in a fully MHC-mismatched murine model of acute kidney rejection using IL-18-deficient recipients (IL-18-/-) and animals administered neutralizing IL-18 binding protein (IL-18BP). Gene expression of IL-18 and its receptor were significantly upregulated in allografts compared to isografts, as was the cellular infiltrate (T cells and macrophages) (p < 0.001). Allografts developed kidney dysfunction (p < 0.05) and tubulitis (p < 0.01) not observed in controls. There was a significant reduction in gene expression of IL-18 downstream pro-inflammatory molecules (iNOS, TNFalpha and IFNgamma) in IL-18-/- recipients (p < 0.01), and IL-18BP-treated animals. The CD4+ infiltrate and IL-4 mRNA expression was greater in the IL-18-/- recipients than wild-type (WT) allografts and IL-18BP-treated animals (p < 0.05), suggesting a Th2-bias which was supported by IFNgamma and IL-4 ELISPOT data and an increased eosinophil accumulation (p < 0.001). Neither IL-18 deficiency nor neutralization prevented renal dysfunction or tubulitis. This study demonstrates increased production of IL-18 in murine kidney allograft rejection and provides evidence that IL-18-induced pathways of inflammation are active. However, neither IL-18 deficiency nor neutralization was protective against the development of allograft rejection.