A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin in patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine when used in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin (ECC) in patients with oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma. Response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were also determined, and the effect of previous oesophago-gastric surgery or concurrent oesophago-gastric cancer on the absorption and metabolism of capecitabine was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma received up to six cycles of epirubicin (50 mg/m(2) i.v., 3-weekly), cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) i.v., 3-weekly) and capecitabine, the latter administered orally in an intermittent schedule (14 days treatment; 7-day rest period) at 3-weekly intervals. Patients were recruited into one of four escalating dose cohorts (500, 825, 1000 and 1250 mg/m(2) bd). Dose escalation occurred after six patients had completed at least one cycle of chemotherapy at the previous dose level, with DLT assessed on the toxicity of the first cycle only. Blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analyses was performed over the first 10 h of day 1 of cycle 1. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients, median age 63 years (range 32-76 years), ECOG performance status < or =2 with locally advanced (10) or metastatic (22) disease were recruited and were evaluable for toxicity. Two of five patients experienced DLT at 1250 mg/m(2) bd with grade II stomatitis (one patient) and grade III diarrhoea with febrile neutropenia (one patient). Cumulative toxicity for all cycles (n = 140) (worst grade per patient) includes grade IV oesophagitis (one patient), grade III diarrhoea (five), grade IV neutropenia with infection (seven), grade II stomatitis (four) and grade IV thrombocytopenia (one). Of 29 patients with evaluable disease, there was one complete response and six partial responses [24% response rate [95% confidence interval (CI) 10% to 44%]], a median PFS of 22 weeks (95% CI 17-27 weeks) and median overall survival of 34 weeks (95% CI 19-49 weeks). Capecitabine was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with a t(max) of 1-2 h for capecitabine, DFCR (5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine) and DFUR (5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine). The C(max) and AUC(0-)( infinity ) for capecitabine, DFCR and DFUR were similar to those observed in previous monotherapy studies of capecitabine taken after food. CONCLUSION: A dose of 1000 mg/m(2) bd of capecitabine is recommended for use on an intermittent schedule in combination with these doses and schedule of epirubicin and cisplatin. This regimen is tolerable and active in oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma. A randomised phase III comparison with ECF is justified.     

Phase I, dose-finding study of capecitabine in combination with docetaxel and epirubicin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine with considerable activity and minimal myelosuppression and alopecia. This phase I study evaluated the addition of capecitabine to epirubicin/docetaxel combination therapy as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three female patients with advanced breast cancer received capecitabine (765-1060 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of a 3-week treatment cycle) in combination with epirubicin and docetaxel (75 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1). RESULTS: The maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine was 985 mg/m2 and the principal dose-limiting toxicity was febrile neutropenia. No grade 3/4 anemia or thrombocytopenia occurred. There were no grade 4 non-hematological events and grade 3 events other than alopecia were rare. Alopecia occurred in all patients and treatment cycles, and asthenia occurred in all patients and in 84% of treatment cycles. Other frequent adverse events included nausea, vomiting, fever, paresthesia and elevated transaminase levels. An objective response to treatment was observed in 91% (95% confidence interval 72% to 99%) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of capecitabine to docetaxel/epirubicin combination therapy provides a well-tolerated and active first-line chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced breast cancer, and merits phase II/III evaluation.     

Combination chemotherapy with carboplatin, capecitabine and epirubicin (ECarboX) as second- or third-line treatment in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer: a phase I/II trial

Platinum-based combination chemotherapy has been proven to be superior to single-agent platinum in the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer after a treatment-free interval of more than 6 months. A response rate of 41% was previously reported by our group using a combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU in patients who relapsed within 12 months, we therefore assessed a similar, but more convenient combination of epirubicin, carboplatin and capecitabine in this phase-I/II trial. In total, 18 patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma, who had not received more than two lines of chemotherapy and the treatment-free interval exceeded 6 months were treated with carboplatin AUC5, epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) and capecitabine at several dose levels on continuous 21 day cycles and 14 of 21 day cycles. Patients were assessed for toxicity and by CT and CA-125 for response. The overall response rate was 61.1%, with three complete and eight partial responses. Grade 3/4 haematological toxicity was seen in 10 out of 18 patients and caused dose reductions and treatment delays. The combination of epirubicin, carboplatin and capecitabine showed good activity but caused excessive toxicity. A phase-II trial using carboplatin and capecitabine is underway.     

A phase II trial of S-1 and cisplatin in patients with metastatic or relapsed biliary tract cancer.

BACKGROUND: Optimal chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is yet to be defined. We carried out this study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin in metastatic or relapsed BTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pathologically proven BTC were eligible. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of S-1 (40 mg/m(2) p.o. b.i.d. from D1-14) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) on D1), repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-one BTC patients (metastatic:relapsed = 37:14, Gall-bladder:intrahepatic bile ducts:extrahepatic bile ducts = 16:25:10) were enrolled from January 2005 to December 2006. Median age was 57 years (range, 31-71) and most patients had a good performance status. The overall response rate was 30% [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.3-42.7] and complete response was observed in two patients (4%), partial response in 13 (26%), stable disease in 21 (42%), and progressive disease in 9 (18%). With a median follow-up of 12.4 months, the median time to progression was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.3-6.3) and median overall survival was 8.7 months (95% CI, 6.0-11.4). Major toxic effects were grade 3/4 neutropenia (8.9% of all cycles) and febrile neutropenia was observed in six cycles (2.7% of all cycles). CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin was a moderately effective outpatient-based regimen in BTC patients. Toxic effects were moderate but manageable.     

The Efficacy and Safety of Modified Docetaxel,Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil Vs. Epirubicin,Oxaliplatin, and Capecitabine Regimen in the Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Introduction: One of the major challenges of advanced gastric cancer treatment is the lack of a standard regimen for patients. However, several clinical trials have shown that modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (m-DCF) and epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (EOX) regimens are superior to other regimens. Methods: This randomized, single-center clinical trial was performed on 40 patients with advanced gastric cancer. The first group received the m-DCF regimen as follows: docetaxel (40 mg/m2) on the first day; cisplatin (40 mg/m2) on the first and second days; and 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2) from the first to fourth day. The second group received the EOX regimen, including epirubicin (50 mg/m2) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) i.v on the first day and capecitabine at a twice-daily dose of 625 mg/m2 p.o for 21 days. Treatment was applied every three weeks for a total of eight cycles in both groups. In each group, the overall and progression-free survival rates and toxicity were assessed. Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study (21 samples in the m-DCF group and 19 samples in the EOX group), 62.5% of whom were male. The median survival rate was 14.00 (95% CI: 11.82-16.18) months in the m-DCF group and 15.00 (95% CI: 9.56-20.43) months in the EOX group; however, differences between the groups were not significant. The progression-free survival rate was higher in the EOX group, although there was no significant difference between the two groups. Also, there was no significant difference regarding the side effects (e.g., toxicity) or need for supportive care between the groups. Conclusion: It seems that both m-DCF and EOX regimens are similar in terms of survival and toxicity and are recommended as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer with respect to the patient’s status.     

A dose-finding study of raltitrexed (tomudex) with cisplatin and epirubicin in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma

The standard treatment for advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer in the UK is epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-fluoruracil by an indwelling central venous catheter (ECF), which has significant morbidity. Raltitrexed (tomudex), a specific inhibitor of thymidylate synthase with a long plasma terminal half-life (50-100 h) has activity in gastro-intestinal tract malignancy. To reduce the Hickman line-associated morbidity of ECF; we have conducted a dose-finding study of tomudex combined with epirubicin and cisplatin. Twenty-four patients (22 males, two female), median age 63 years (range 21-75), ECOG performance status < or =2 with histologically proven, unresectable or metastatic gastric (14 patients), gastro-oesophageal junction (nine patients) or oesophageal (one patient) adenocarcinoma received treatment with 3-weekly cisplatin 60 mg m(-2), epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) and tomudex at doses of 2 mg m(-2), 2.5 mg m(-2) or 3 mg m(-2) in successive cohorts. Six patients were treated per dose level with no intra-patient dose escalation. Dose escalation occurred after six patients had completed at least one cycle of chemotherapy at the previous dose level. After defining the maximum tolerated dose a further six patients were treated at the preceding dose level to assess toxicity at the proposed phase II dose. A total of 102 cycles (50% completed 6 cycles) were administered. The dose-limiting toxicities are neutropenia and diarrhoea occurring in 2/6 patients at the 3 mg m(-2) dose level. Of those patients evaluable for response, there were eight partial and one complete response (overall response rate 38%). The median survival was 9.9 months. ECT is an active regimen in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The recommended dose of tomudex for further study in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin is 2.5 mg m(-2).     

Neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix with epirubicin, paclitaxel and cisplatin

PURPOSE: The present study was conducted to explore whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a combination of epirubicin, paclitaxel and cisplatin could improve the operability and pathological response rate in locally advanced cervical cancer patients. METHODS: Between April 1996 and July 2000, 42 patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix, FIGO stage Ib(2)-IVa, were treated with two or three 21-day cycles of an epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) regimen. RESULTS: All patients were eligible for evaluation of toxicity and response. A total of 92 courses of therapy were administered. Three patients had a 20% reduction from the starting dose due to haematological toxicity. Grade 3-4 leukopenia was observed in 15% of cycles, requiring G-CSF support in half of them. Major non-haematological toxicity consisted of grade 3 alopecia (100%), and grade 3 nausea and vomiting (40%). A total of 33 clinical responses (78.5%, 95% CI 63.8-93.2) were recorded, 8 complete responses (CR) and 25 partial responses (PR). Of the 42 patients, 32 (76.2%) underwent radical surgery. At pathological examination 8 complete or microscopic pathological responses, 17 PRs, and 9 patients with stable disease were observed. The median follow-up time was 17 months for the 42 patients enrolled (range 3-62 months). Among the patients submitted to radical surgery, five recurrences were observed, with a median disease-free survival of 47 months. Median overall survival had not been reached at the time of this report. These results appear to be in the range reported for other neoadjuvant cisplatin-based regimens not including paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the epirubicin, paclitaxel and cisplatin combination followed by radical surgery proved to be a safe and effective approach to advanced cervical cancer.     

Phase I/II pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed and epirubicin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed and epirubicin are each active in patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This phase I/II study evaluated these drugs as a combination regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with locally advanced or MBC were enrolled. Pemetrexed 400-600 mg/m2 and epirubicin 60-90 mg/m2 were administered on day 1 every 21 days. The recommended phase II dose was evaluated in a 2-stage design. RESULTS: Phase I enrolled 34 patients and evaluated 5 dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Patients received a median of 7.5 cycles (range, 1-8 cycles), and promising efficacy (partial response [PR], 32%; stable disease [SD], 50%) was observed. Pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed was unchanged when combined with epirubicin. Selected phase II regimen (pemetrexed 600 mg/m2 and epirubicin 75 mg/m2) was administered to 22 patients (median, 4.5 cycles; range 1-13 cycles). Five patients experienced a PR (23%), and 10 experienced SD (46%). This response was below the predefined efficacy requirements for subsequent enrollment, and accrual was stopped. Median time to progression was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.1-8.9 months), and median time to treatment failure was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.9 months). CONCLUSION: The regimen is safe but cannot be recommended as first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer because of the low response rate.     

A phase II study of epirubicin, cisplatin and uracil-tegafur for advanced gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Due to its greater convenience, a combination of uracil and tegafur (referred to as UFT) taken orally is an attractive alternative to continuous intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion. This phase II study assessed the response rate and toxicity profile of the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and UFT in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach. METHODS: Epirubicin (50 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) were administered i.v. to 35 patients with metastatic gastric carcinoma on day 1, and subsequently UFT (300 mg/m(2)/day) was administered orally in divided doses for 21 days. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. The response rate, time to disease progression, survival and toxic effects were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-two of the 35 enrolled patients were assessed subsequently for response. The median number of cycles was four. Thirteen patients (40.6%) showed partial responses, while none showed a complete response. The median time to progression of carcinoma was 20.4 weeks, and the median survival was 37 weeks. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 25% of patients. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting was observed in 28% of patients. No treatment-related death was observed. All patients received doses as planned, except for one who required a 75% dose reduction due to nephrotoxicity. Six of 132 cycles were delayed >7 days after four cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and UFT showed anticancer activity against metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, had a tolerable toxicity profile and showed excellent patient compliance.     

A phase 2 study of gemcitabine and epirubicin for the treatment of pleural mesothelioma: a North Central Cancer Treatment Study, N0021

BACKGROUND: The North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the antitumor activity of the combination of gemcitabine and epirubicin in patients with pleural mesothelioma who received no more than 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. METHODS: A total of 23 patients were accrued between August 2001 and April 2002 and received gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes weekly every 2 weeks and epirubicin at a dose of 90 mg/m(2) intravenously on Day 1 on an every-21-days cycle (high-dose patient group). Between August 2002 and April 2004, an additional 45 patients were treated at a reduced dose of gemcitabine of 750 mg/m(2) and epirubicin at a dose of 70 mg/m(2) with the same schedule (low-dose patient group). RESULTS: In the high-dose patient group, the confirmed response rate was 13% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3-34%). The median survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.4-10.7 months) and the median time to disease progression was 6.3 months (95% CI, 3.0-7.6 months). In the low-dose patient group, the confirmed response rate was 7% (95% CI, 0-28%). The median survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.7-8.7 months) and the median time to disease progression was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.7-5.6 months). Toxicity was moderate to severe. In the high-dose and low-dose groups, 87% and 60% of patients, respectively, experienced at least 1 adverse event of grade 4 or higher (according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]). The quality of life remained similar from baseline to the end of the 2 cycles of treatment in the high-dose group but worsened in the low-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the combination regimen of gemcitabine and epirubicin was found to demonstrate minimal antitumor activity against pleural mesothelioma.     

Phase I study of short-time oxaliplatin, capecitabine and epirubicin (EXE) as first line therapy in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer

A phase I trial of short-time oxaliplatin (E), capecitabine (X) and epirubicin (E) for patients with metastatic gastric cancer was initiated to establish the recommended dose for further therapy with short-time EXE. Patients received out-patient therapy with a fixed dose of epirubicin 50 mg/m² day 1; escalating doses of capecitabine (1 000 to 1 250 mg/m²/day continuously) and escalating doses of oxaliplatin (85 to 130 mg/m² day 1 as a 30 minutes infusion). Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. From June 2003 to June 2004, 31 patients were treated. Median age was 61 years (39-75 years), and median performance status was 0 (0-2). At level 3, one of six patients developed DLT and at dose level 4, two of six patients developed DLT (both patients had grade 4 hematological toxicities) and thus further dose escalation was not attempted. Median number of cycles was 6 (1-8), median survival was 9.2 months and median TTP was 7.5 months. A combination of epirubicin 50 mg/m² day 1, capecitabine 1 000 mg/m² continuously and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² day 1 each 3 weeks is an easily administered and well tolerated out-patient regimen for patients with non-resectable gastric cancer.     

Capecitabine in combination with docetaxel and epirubicin in patients with previously untreated,advanced breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of oral capecitabine in combination with docetaxel and epirubicin (TEX) as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced/metastatic breast carcinoma. METHODS: This open-label, Phase II study was conducted at six Italian centers. Treatment consisted of epirubicin, 75 mg/m(2) (intravenous bolus), and docetaxel, 75 mg/m(2) (1-hour infusion), both administered on Day 1, plus oral capecitabine, 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily, on Days 1-14 of each 3-week treatment cycle. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients received 392 cycles of treatment, with a median of 6 cycles in patients with Stage III disease (n = 34 patients) and a median of 8 cycles in patients with Stage IV disease (n = 33 patients). The objective response rate was 82%, including complete responses in 21% of patients. A greater proportion of patients with Stage III disease achieved tumor responses compared with patients who had Stage IV disease (97% vs. 67%, respectively). Among 34 patients with Stage III disease, pathologic complete responses were confirmed in 10 patients (29%). TEX chemotherapy demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. There was a low incidence of Grade 3 adverse events, and Grade 4 adverse events were particularly rare (4%). The most common Grade 3-4 adverse event was febrile neutropenia, which occurred in 16% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: TEX combination therapy has important antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in this setting. A large, randomized, Phase III trial is ongoing to compare TEX chemotherapy with an epirubicin plus docetaxel regimen in patients with untreated, advanced breast carcinoma.     

Non-infusional 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma

To reduce the Hickman line-associated morbidity of continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil combined with epirubicin and cisplatin (ECF) and to investigate the need for infusional regimens, we conducted a retrospective study in patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Thirty-six patients, with histologically proven irresectable gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma were given: 60 mg/m 2 cisplatin on day 1, 35 mg/m 2 doxorubicin on day 1 and 500 mg/m 2 5-fluorouracil on days 1 and 8 (NIACF) every 3-weeks. A median of 3 cycles was administered. The principal toxicity was myelosuppression with grade III/IV neutropenia in 47% of cycles. Neutropenic fever occurred in 5% of the cycles; non-haematological toxicity was mild and there were no treatment-related deaths. Administered dose intensity was 96.1% for doxorubicin, 93.6% for cisplatin and 90.5% for 5-fluorouracil. There were 16 partial responses and 1 complete response (overall response rate 47%, 95% confidence interval CI 31-63%); 8 patients had stable disease. Median progression-free and overall survival rates were 5 months (95% CI 4-6) and 8 months (95% CI 6-10), respectively. NIACF is a well-tolerated regimen in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma that precludes the need for central venous access, with activity similar to that observed with ECF.     

Weekly epirubicin plus docetaxel as first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a weekly schedule of epirubicin in combination with docetaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A total of 43 women with MBC not previously treated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease received weekly epirubicin 25 mg m(-2) and docetaxel 25 mg m(-2) for a maximum of five cycles (total cumulative epirubicin dose of < or =900 mg m(-2)). Dose reduction was not permitted. Objective response and evaluation of toxicity profile were the primary study end points; time to progression and overall survival were secondary end points. Patients were followed for a median of 21 (4-38) months. Analysis was by intent to treat; 33 patients completed five cycles of therapy, and the median dose of epirubicin administered to the 43 patients was 23 mg m(-2). Twenty-five patients (58%) achieved a partial response and one (2%) achieved a complete response. An additional 12 patients (28%) had stable disease. The median time to progression was 11 months (95% confidence intervals (CI) 7-14) overall, and 13 months (95% CI 12-14) in the 26 patients who responded to treatment. Median overall survival was 25 months for responders and 14 months for nonresponders. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 16% of patients and in 6% of cycles. One patient developed cardiac toxicity (20% reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction). The combination of epirubicin plus docetaxel is highly active in MBC, with a manageable toxicity profile. Such a weekly schedule might provide a valuable treatment option for MBC.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of weekly docetaxel, cisplatin, and daily capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine are three active chemotherapeutic agents with different mechanisms of action. This phase I study investigated the feasibility and pharmacokinetics of this combination given on a weekly schedule. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Docetaxel and cisplatin were given i.v. over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine was given orally bid on days 1 to 14 (every 21 days). Escalation occurred in cohorts of three patients until the maximum tolerated dose was defined. Pharmacokinetics studies of docetaxel and total and ultrafiltrate platinum after cisplatin administration were done on cycle 1 (with capecitabine) and cycle 2 (without capecitabine). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Two of six patients at dose level 5 had a dose-limiting infection and diarrhea. One of six evaluable patients at dose level 4 (27 mg/m2 docetaxel, 27 mg/m2 cisplatin, 825 mg/m2 capecitabine) had a dose-limiting hypomagnesemia. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were similar on cycles 1 and 2. Area under the plasma concentrations versus time curves of total platinum was significantly greater in cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 (P = 0.001). There was no difference in the disposition of docetaxel on cycles 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended docetaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine dose for phase II studies is 27/27/825 mg/m2. The alteration in total and ultrafiltrate platinum disposition on cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 may be inherent to sequential cisplatin administration; however, prior treatment with capecitabine cannot be ruled out as a factor.     

Salvage treatment with epirubicin and/or paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients relapsed after high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor cells

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To evaluate feasibility and efficacy of paclitaxel as a single agent or in combination with epirubicin in breast cancer taxane-naive patients who have failed previous high-dose chemotherapy. METHODS: Since February 1995, we have treated 32 patients in first relapse or progression after high-dose chemotherapy. Nineteen patients had metastatic breast cancer, 12 more than 3 involved axillary lymph nodes, and 1 inflammatory breast cancer at inclusion to the program. The median time to relapse after high-dose chemotherapy was 12 months (range, 2-43). At relapse, 12 patients were treated with epirubicin (90 mg/m2) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) administered on day 1 every 21 days. In 20 patients who had previously received more than 350 mg/m2 of a cumulative dose of epirubicin and in one patient pretreated with chemotherapy containing mitoxantrone, we employed paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) alone. A median number of five courses was administered (range, 2-10). RESULTS: The overall response rate after 3 courses (29 of 32 patients were assessable) was 55% and after 6 courses (21 of 32 patients were assessable) was 57%. The median time to progression was 7 months (95% CI, 5.7-9.2), and median survival was 27.5 months (95% CI, 17.8-37.0). Toxicity was recorded for 180 cycles (epirubicin + paclitaxel for 62 cycles and paclitaxel alone for 118 cycles). The main toxicity in both regimens was hematologic. We observed WHO grade 3-4 neutropenia (in 8 patients, 25%), for which G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day s.c.) was employed. WHO grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2 patients (6%) and WHO grade 3 anemia in 1 patient (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that paclitaxel (alone or in combination with epirubicin) is feasible as salvage treatment in heavily pretreated patients.     

A phase II study of epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antitumor activity and safety of an epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECX) combination in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or advanced measurable gastric adenocarcinoma received ECX combination chemotherapy. Epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 were administered on day 1 by intravenous injection. Capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily was administered orally on day 1-14. The cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty patients were assessable for responses and 53 for toxicity. A total of 250 cycles were administered. The overall best response rate by intent-to-treat analysis was 59% including 52% partial responses and 7% complete responses. Median response duration and time to progression was 5.8 and 6 months, respectively. Median survival for all patients was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.7-10.5 months). The most common grade 3/4 hematological adverse event was neutropenia in 31% (76 cycles) including febrile neutropenia in 4.8% (11 cycles). Non-hematological toxicity was generally mild and reversible. Grade 3/4 nausea, vomiting and stomatitis occurred in 8, 9, and 8% of the patients, respectively. Hand-foot skin reactions developed in 51% of patients, but most were self-limited. Grade 3 occurred in only 4%. One patient died of neutropenic sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: ECX combination regimen showed high anti-tumor activity with a tolerable toxicity pattern as a front-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer.     

Phase II study of capecitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary cancer.

BACKGROUND: A phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy and tolerability of substituting capecitabine for 5-fluorouracil in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable measurable biliary adenocarcinoma received oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14, and intravenous cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1. This cycle was repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 38 were assessable for efficacy and 41 were assessable for safety. A median of three cycles of treatment (range one to eight) were administered. One patient achieved a complete response, and eight had partial responses, giving an overall response rate of 21.4% in the intention-to-treat population (95% confidence interval 9.1% to 33.9%). The median response duration was 5.1 months. The median time to progression and median overall survival were 3.7 and 9.1 months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (20% of patients), vomiting (12%), diarrhea (7%) and stomatitis (5%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of capecitabine and cisplatin has promising antitumor activity and is well tolerated in patients with advanced biliary cancer.     

Capecitabine and radiation therapy preceded and followed by combination chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerance and toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) and capecitabine in patients with advanced, unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. To control micrometastatic disease, combination chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin) before and after combined modality therapy (CMT) was planned. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer were eligible. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 were administered on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for two cycles. RT was then given to a dose of 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions. Patients were treated with capecitabine 1330 mg/m2 daily during RT. After CMT, two additional cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin completed the treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were treated. Eighteen patients completed CMT. One patient was removed from study during CMT for toxicity issues. Treatment delays and dose reductions were common during the final two cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin as a result of myelosuppression. Median survival was 10.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.6, 13.7) for all 23 patients and 12.8 months (95% CI = 8.2, 18.9) for 18 patients without metastasis. CONCLUSION: Combined modality therapy with RT and capecitabine was well tolerated. Chemotherapy after CMT was difficult to complete owing to cumulative myelosuppression. Survival, response, and toxicity were comparable to infusional 5-fluorouracil and RT.     

The efficacy of epirubicin, cisplatin, uracil/tegafur, and leucovorin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Advanced biliary tract carcinoma is among the most prevalent fatal diseases in Korea. However, to our knowledge, to date no effective therapeutic modality has been shown to prolong the survival of patients in the inoperable stages of this disease. METHODS: This Phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of a combined regimen of epirubicin, cisplatin, and uracil/tegafur (UFT) modulated by leucovorin in patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract carcinoma. RESULTS: Eleven of 40 patients (27.5%) had gallbladder carcinoma, and the remaining patients had tumors arising from other sites in the biliary tract. All patients were treated with intravenous epirubicin (50 mg/m(2) on Day 1), intravenous cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) on Day 1), oral UFT (300 mg/m(2) per day on Days 1-21), and oral leucovorin (75 mg per day on Days 1-21). Nine patients exhibited a partial response, representing 22.5% of the possible response rate (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 12.8-32.2%) based on an intention-to-treat analysis. The median survival was 34 weeks (95% CI, 20-48 weeks), and the median time to disease progression was 16 weeks (95% CI, 7-25 weeks). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia comprised dose-limiting toxicity conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and UFT modulated by leucovorin was active marginally in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma and was capable of stabilizing the disease effectively. Because it was a safe and convenient treatment modality, it may be used in outpatient care with only minor toxicity in patients with advanced malignancies of the biliary tract.