A comparison of enflurane with alfentanil anaesthesia for gynaecological surgery

Forty patients undergoing gynaecological surgery were randomly assigned to receive either alfentanil and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia, followed by alfentanil-N2O/O2 (60%/40%) for maintenance of anaesthesia, or low-dose fentanyl and thiopentone, followed by enflurane-N2O/O2 (60%/40%). More patients given enflurane developed a tachycardia (P less than 0.03) and 20% decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Times to recovery were significantly shorter after alfentanil than after enflurane. Plasma concentrations of alfentanil during induction suggested that haemodynamic and catecholamine responses were either less than, or did not differ from, baseline levels when the plasma concentration of the drug exceeded 150 ng ml-1. At extubation and the beginning of spontaneous breathing, the plasma concentration was 278 +/- 129 ng ml-1. Values for pharmacokinetic parameters of alfentanil were as follows: clearance, 5.2 +/- 2.0 ml kg-1 min-1; volume of distribution, 0.63 +/- 0.20 1 kg-1; and elimination half-life, 96.9 +/- 52.5 min. Two patients who had extended surgery had significantly lower plasma clearance of alfentanil and increased half-life. The authors conclude that the alfentanil technique was preferable to maintenance with enflurane.     

Continuous opioid infusions for neurosurgical procedures: a double-blind comparison of alfentanil and fentanyl

The ability of continuous infusions of opioids to control hypertension at the end of neurosurgical procedures without compromising prompt emergence was studied in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumours. Four infusion regimens were compared in a randomized double-blind fashion; three of alfentanil and one of fentanyl. Low-dose alfentanil was administered to nine patients (35.1 micrograms.kg-1 then a continuous infusion of 16.2 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1); mid-dose alfentanil to eight patients (70.2 micrograms.kg-1 then 32.4 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1); high-dose alfentanil to eight patients (105.3 micrograms.kg-1 then 48.6 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1). Eight additional patients were given fentanyl (8.3 micrograms.kg-1 then 1.6 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1). Using published values for the pharmacokinetic variables of alfentanil and fentanyl, modelling predicted stable concentrations of 60, 120, 180 ng.ml-1 for the alfentanil infusion regimens respectively and 2 ng.ml-1 with the fentanyl regimen. Maintenance anaesthesia comprised the opioid infusion, 50% N2O in O2 and isoflurane titrated to control mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 20% of ward MAP. Isoflurane was discontinued after closure of the dura. Nitrous oxide was discontinued at the same time as reversal of neuromuscular blockade. The opioid infusion was discontinued with closure of the galea. A greater time-averaged isoflurane concentration was required to control MAP within the prescribed limits in the low alfentanil group (ANOVA; P less than 0.05). The PaCO2 at two, five and 30 min after extubation were not different among groups. The times from discontinuing N2O to eye opening and tracheal extubation were not different. The time to follow commands was longer in the low alfentanil group (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Anaesthesia for laparoscopy: alfentanil and fentanyl compared

A double blind comparison was made between alfentanil and fentanyl as analgesic components of anaesthesia. Sixty-six women undergoing laparoscopy received methohexitone, alcuronium, nitrous oxide and oxygen, with either alfentanil 0.75 mg or fentanyl 0.25 mg. Ten of the patients who received alfentanil and 1 patient who received fentanyl required supplementation of anaesthesia by enflurane. Recovery from anaesthesia was similar in the two groups of patients though the onset of spontaneous breathing occurred more quickly after alfentanil (P less than 0.002). The injection of fentanyl was followed by a fall in BP (P less than 0.05) and the mean minimum value for pulse rate occurring after fentanyl was slower than after alfentanil (P less than 0.05).     

Total intravenous anaesthesia with midazolam and flumazenil in outpatient clinics

Total intravenous anaesthesia with midazolam and alfentanil, reversed with the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil, was studied in patients admitted for outpatient gynaecological dilatation and curettage. One hundred patients were randomly allocated to four groups with different anaesthetic techniques: I: alfentanil and thiopentone induction, 66% N2O maintenance; II: alfentanil and midazolam sedation prior to isoflurane and N2O induction and maintenance; III: midazolam and alfentanil induction; oxygen/air, placebo reversal; IV: midazolam and alfentanil induction, oxygen/air, flumazenil reversal. All methods of anaesthesia proved satisfactory with no serious side-effects or complications. Induction was faster in Group I (26 s) compared with Group III and IV (37-38 s) and Group I (62 s). Respiration was less depressed in Group II compared with the other groups. Recovery function was better in Group IV during the first 30 postoperative min and worse in Group III during the first 120 postoperative min compared with the other groups. Reduced performances in P-deletion and 4-choice reaction-time tests in the midazolam patients were not reversed by 0.5 mg flumazenil, suggesting that flumazenil did not antagonize all benzodiazepine effects in our patients. Postoperative amnesia was most pronounced in Group III. There was no significant difference in patient function 7 h postoperatively, at home in the evening or during the next days. We conclude that total intravenous anaesthesia with alfentanil and midazolam with flumazenil reversal is a promising technique for short outpatient anaesthetic procedures.     

Analgesia for appendectomy: comparison of fentanyl and alfentanil in children

During etomidate-N2O vecuronium anaesthesia for appendectomy, three groups of 13 children received fentanyl as a 10 micrograms.kg-1 loading dose and 2 micrograms.kg-1 increments in Group F, alfentanil as a 100 micrograms.kg-1 initial loading dose and either 20 micrograms.kg-1 increments in Group AB or 1 microgram.kg-1.min-1 continuous infusion in Group AI. On the basis of intraoperative heart rate changes, the opioid regimen was less efficient in Group AB (P less than 0.05). Based upon equianalgesic cumulative dosage, the alfentanil/fentanyl potency ratio was in the range of 1/10 to 1/13. The awakening time was similar in all groups, as were the duration of postoperative analgesia, the incidence of postoperative pain and the incidence of nausea and vomiting. We conclude that high-dose alfentanil is as efficient as fentanyl for intra and postoperative analgesia in children undergoing appendectomy.     

Anaesthesia with desflurane-nitrous oxide in elderly patients. Comparison with isoflurane-nitrous oxide

BACKGROUND: Desflurane is a new volatile anaesthetic, very little soluble. We wished to compare efficacy, safety, and emergence and recovers; profiles of desflurane-N2O versus isoflurane-N2O anaesthesia in elderly patients. METHODS: Experimental design: single blind, prospective randomised study. Setting: operating rooms of two major teaching hospitals affiliated with the University of Milan. Patients: fifty-seven patients ASA physical status II or III, aged 65 or older, undergoing urological (non-endoscopic), orthopaedic or gynaecological (non-laparoscopic) surgery of at least one hour duration, were randomly assigned to receive general anaesthesia with either desflurane or isoflurane in 60% N2O- 40% O2, after standardised premedication and induction. MEASUREMENTS: vital signs, end-tidal agent, narcotic requirement, and adverse event appearance were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients received desflurane and 29 isoflurane. Demographics, anaesthesia duration and exposure, and intraoperative fentanyl requirement were comparable in the two groups. Immediate emergence from anaesthesia (time to extubation and hand grip on command) was faster in desflurane group, albeit not significantly (8.4 +/- 6.4 vs 11.0 +/- 6.5 min and 8.6 +/- 6.0 vs 11.8 +/- 6.0); on the contrary, early recovery (time to state the name and date of birth) was significantly shorter in patients receiving desflurane (11.1 +/- 6.2 vs 17.3 +/- 7.8 min and 13.1 +/- 6.0 vs 20.9 +/- 10.9 min). Only 24 patients (12 in desflurane and 12 in isoflurane group) did need postoperative fentanyl administration; among them, requirement was significantly higher in desflurane patients (3.4 +/- 1.1 vs 2.4 +/- 1.3 micrograms.kg-1. Total time in recovery room was not different between anaesthetics, as well as adverse event prevalence and severity. CONCLUSIONS: Early recovery in elderly patients is faster after desflurane than isoflurane anaesthesia; this might contribute to increased requirement of postoperative analgesia. Occurrence of adverse event is comparable between the two anaesthetics.     

The haemodynamic effects of bronchoscopy

The cardiovascular responses to bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia were investigated in 36 premedicated patients. Twelve patients acting as controls received a standard intravenous anaesthetic of intermittent thiopentone and suxamethonium. A further 24 patients were given either fentanyl 6 micrograms/kg or alfentanil 18 micrograms/kg intravenously, one minute prior to induction. There were significant rises in systolic arterial blood pressure (p less than 0.05) and in rate pressure product (p less than 0.05) in the patients in the control group, but these changes were not seen in those patients receiving either fentanyl or alfentanil. However, dysrhythmias and ST segment changes indicative of myocardial ischaemia were present in some patients in all three groups.     

Alfentanil supplemented anaesthesia for short procedures

Thirty-nine unpremedicated patients who presented for cystoscopy were given either alfentanil or saline in a random double-blind fashion immediately before anaesthesia with etomidate, nitrous oxide and enflurane. Alfentanil significantly reduced myoclonus associated with etomidate. During anaesthesia, patients who received alfentanil had smaller minute volumes, lower respiratory frequencies, and smaller increases in heart rate. The incidence of apnoea was not significantly increased. After operation, patients who received alfentanil were prescribed significantly more analgesia, possibly because of their reduced uptake of volatile anaesthetic agent. It is concluded that supplementation with alfentanil improves the quality of anaesthesia induced with etomidate.     

Effects of fentanyl or alfentanil as supplement to propofol anaesthesia for termination of pregnancy

One hundred and twenty patients undergoing early legal termination of pregnancy by dilatation and suction curettage before 12 weeks of pregnancy were randomly allocated to receive total intravenous propofol anaesthesia either alone or supplemented with fentanyl 1.5 μg·kg^-1 or alfentanil 15 μg kg^-1. Supplementation with fentanyl or alfentanil improved operating conditions ( P <0.01), reduced total propofol requirements ( P < 0.01) and reduced postoperative pain intensity ( P < 0.05). Immediate recovery, assessed by the time patients took to open the eyes, to give correct date of birth and by co–operation score, was more rapid in the alfentanil group compared to the control group ( P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between the alfentanil and fentanyl groups. The three anaesthetic techniques did not differ with regard to side effects.
In conclusion, total intravenous propofol anaesthesia in patients undergoing early termination of pregnancy was improved by supplementation with either fentanyl 1.5 μg kg^-1 or alfentanil 15 μg–kg^-1. The benefit was slightly greater with alfentanil than with fentanyl.     

Ventilatory effects of nitrous oxide during continuous infusion of fentanyl or alfentanil

Two groups of eight patients received infusions of either fentanyl at 3 micrograms kg-1 h-1 or alfentanil at 20 micrograms kg-1 h-1 as supplements to 66% N2O in oxygen anaesthesia, during and after body surface surgery. At the end of surgery, the N2O was reduced to 50% and after measurement of ventilatory frequency, minute ventilation, and the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide, N2O was discontinued. The opioid infusions were continued for a further hour and the ventilatory measurements repeated. Both sets of measurements were compared with preoperative values. Minute ventilation (P less than 0.01), frequency (P less than 0.01) and the response to carbon dioxide (P less than 0.01) were reduced during the infusion of fentanyl with N2O; with fentanyl alone, minute ventilation (P less than 0.05) and the response to carbon dioxide (P less than 0.01) were reduced but to a lesser degree. The elimination of nitrous oxide from the inspired gas mixture produced an increase in frequency (P less than 0.05) and increases in the slope (P less than 0.01) and ventilation at 7.3 kPa (P less than 0.025) of the carbon dioxide response curve. Minute ventilation (P less than 0.01) frequency (P less than 0.05) and response to carbon dioxide (P less than 0.01) were all reduced during the infusion of alfentanil with nitrous oxide; with alfentanil alone, minute ventilation (P less than 0.01), tidal volume (P less than 0.05), the slope (P less than 0.025) and the ventilation at 7.3 kPa (P less than 0.01) of the carbon-dioxide response curve were still reduced.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Randomized comparison of outcome after propofol-nitrous oxide or enflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia in operations of long duration

A randomized, prospective, comparative study was performed to evaluate induction characteristics, haemodynamic changes and recovery in 60 ASA I-II patients undergoing mainly gynaecological laparotomies with either propofol or thiopentone-enflurane anaesthesia. The propofol group (n = 30) received 2 mg.kg-1 propofol for induction of anaesthesia followed by propofol infusion. The thiopentone-enflurane group (n = 30) received thiopentone 4 mg.kg-1 for induction followed by enflurane (0.5-2 per cent). All patients received nitrous oxide (66 per cent] in oxygen begun one minute after tracheal intubation, and fentanyl (1.5 micrograms.kg-1) four minutes prior to induction. Other drugs administered during or after anaesthesia were similar among the groups. Haemodynamic measurements were similar between propofol and enflurane groups except after tracheal intubation when the mean arterial pressure was lower in the propofol group (P less than 0.05). The propofol group had significantly less (P less than 0.01) emesis in the recovery room than the enflurane group. The propofol group experienced significantly less (P less than 0.05) dizziness, depression/sadness and hunger than the enflurane group in the postoperative period as assessed with a visual analogue questionnaire. We conclude that propofol provided better outcome than enflurane in terms of these nonvital but annoying outcome measures after relatively long intra-abdominal operations.     

Recovery and morbidity after daycase anaesthesia

The anaesthetic conditions, recovery and side effects for 48 hours postoperatively were compared after anaesthesia for day surgery using propofol or thiopentone-enflurane with and without alfentanil. Propofol provided good conditions for surgery with faster immediate recovery (p less than 0.001); patients who received it were fit for discharge significantly sooner (p less than 0.001). Visual analogue scores of postoperative wellbeing showed an improvement in both propofol groups (p less than 0.01); after thiopentone and enflurane the scores were reduced and took 2 days to return to the pre-operative values. There was a significant (p less than 0.001) reduction in postoperative morbidity in both the groups that received propofol up to 24 hours after discharge. The addition of alfentanil improved anaesthetic conditions and reduced postoperative morbidity with both propofol and thiopentone-enflurane.     

Out-patient laparoscopy in general anaesthesia with alfentanil and atracurium A comparison with fentanyl and pancuronium

The effects of the new intravenous anaesthetic drugs alfentanil (50 micrograms/kg) and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) on per- and post-operative function in out-patients clinics were compared with fentanyl (5 micrograms/kg) and pancuronium (0.07 mg/kg). Sixty-two healthy female patients submitted for out-patient sterilization by laparoscopy participated in the study. Thirty patients receiving alfentanil and atracurium (the AA-group) had significantly less pain during analgetic injection, less coughing during intubation, and faster and more pronounced muscle relaxation during induction of anaesthesia, compared with 32 patients receiving fentanyl and pancuronium (the FP-group). The AA-group had less adrenocortical stress-response judged by systolic blood pressure and pulse rate during anaesthesia. Reversal of anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade were performed without differences in awakening parameters between the two groups. The AA-group had a significantly better score on P-deletion test 45 min after reversal of anaesthesia, a better street fitness score in the afternoon after the procedure and a better day-life function score at home in the evening. There was no difference between the groups in postoperative complaints and in function after the day of operation.     

A randomized trial of caudal block with bupivacaine 4 mg x kg-1 (1.8 ml x kg-1) plus morphine (150 microg x kg-1) vs general anaesthesia with fentanyl for cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: Regional anaesthesia has been used effectively in paediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery and is thought to be safe. METHODS: Thirty patients ASA physical status II-III undergoing scheduled palliative or corrective cardiac surgery, receiving premedication with midazolam and anaesthetic induction with sevoflurane, fentanyl and pancuronium were randomly allocated to two groups. In group 1, patients received bupivacaine 0.22% 4 mg.kg-1 (1.8 ml.kg-1) and morphine 150 microg x kg-1 by the caudal route. After a 20-min period for the block to take effect, sevoflurane 0.5-1.0% and fentanyl 5 microg x kg-1 were administered for maintenance of anaesthesia. In group 2, the anaesthetic technique was the same as in group 1, without a caudal block and fentanyl 25 microg x kg-1 was administered at the moment of surgical incision. RESULTS: Cardiovascular and haemodynamic responses of patients receiving caudal block showed minor variations during the 20-min period between caudal and general anaesthesia. Fentanyl requirements during surgery were lower (P = 0.001) in patients with caudal block than patients with general anaesthesia. Extubation time was shorter (P = 0.034) in the caudal group. Two patients in the general anaesthesia group and one in the caudal group died because of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal block with bupivacaine 0.22% 4 mg.kg-1 (1.8 ml.kg-1) and morphine 150 microg x kg-1 was safe and effective for paediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, patients might have a better outcome with a reduction of morphine dosage and administration of a muscle relaxant of shorter duration of action than pancuronium.     

Respiratory effects of nitrous oxide during halothane or enflurane anaesthesia in children

The respiratory effects of nitrous oxide (N2O) were studied during halothane and enflurane anaesthesia in 12 children (mean age 46.4 +/- 29.3 months, mean weight 15.3 +/- 4.2 kg) during surgery under continuous extradural anaesthesia. Four equipotent anaesthetic states were studied in random order: 1) halothane 1 MAC in oxygen, 2) halothane 0.5 MAC + 50% N2O, 3) enflurane 1 MAC in oxygen, 4) enflurane 0.5 MAC +50% N2O. End-tidal fractions of CO2 (PetCO2) and halothane and enflurane were measured using infrared analysers. The respiratory variables (tidal volume VT, minute ventilation VE, respiratory frequency F, inspiratory time Ti, mean inspiratory flow VI, effective inspiratory time Ti/Ttot) were measured using a pneumotachograph. Significant changes were observed between the four states for VE, VI, F and PetCO2, whereas the values of VT, Ti and Ti/Tot did not differ significantly. The respiratory depressant effect of 1 MAC of either halothane alone or of the mixture of halothane and N2O was very similar. During enflurane anaesthesia, PetCO2 was less increased when N2O was substituted for enflurane, owing to a significant increase in respiratory frequency. A marked decrease in VE together with an increase in PetCO2 was observed during enflurane anaesthesia (states 3 and 4) when compared to the corresponding states during halothane anaesthesia (states 1 and 2). The respiratory depressant effect of enflurane is greater than that of halothane in unpremedicated children, even when substituting N2O for an equal MAC fraction of enflurane.2+ The effect of N2O on respiratory patterns seems to depend on the inhalational agent used and/or on the vesting respiratory frequency.     

Alfentanil or fentanyl for anaesthetic procedures of two hours duration? A double-blind study

Eighty women undergoing surgery of at least 2-h duration were randomly allocated to receive either alfentanil or fentanyl to supplement a diazepam nitrous oxide/oxygen anaesthetic. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl 0.2 mg and diazepam 10-20 mg and continued with nitrous oxide/oxygen. Analgesia was provided by injection of the narcotic using unlabelled ampoules that contained either alfentanil 0.5 mg ml-1 or fentanyl 0.05 mg ml-1. Apart from a marginally higher heart rate when alfentanil was used, there was no significant difference between groups at any time during the operation. Patients woke 2.7 +/- 3.1 min following discontinuation of nitrous oxide and were extubated after 10.3 +/- 7.6 min (alfentanil) and 17.3 +/- 19.0 min (fentanyl) (P = 0.1). However, following alfentanil significantly more patients could be extubated within 20 min to 30 min after completion of the operation (P less than 0.01). The last top-up dose of alfentanil had to be given nearer the end of the operation than the last dose of fentanyl (P less than 0.01). Patients receiving alfentanil needed significantly more (P less than 0.01) post-operative analgesia.     

Comparison of a combination of fentanyl and alfentanil with propofol in brief surgery

We studied 96 patients undergoing short gynecological procedures. Anaesthesia has been induced with fentanyl 1.5 micrograms/kg (45 patients) or alfentanil micrograms /kg (51 patients) and a hypnotic dose of propofol, and maintained with 70% N2O via facial mask. We observed a better and more rapid control of surgical analgesia with alfentanil, and an earlier recovery of postoperative psychophysical functions. Post-induction apnea has been more frequent and prolonged in the alfentanil group, but no difference in the time necessary to recover an adequate ventilation has been observed between the two groups. Alfentanil anaesthesia determined a more marked intraoperative bradycardia. By virtue of the speed of onset and the short duration of action, alfentanil is a suitable anaesthetic agent for short surgical procedures, particularly in day-stay patients.     

Comparaison de l’incidence sur le saignement de deux techniques anesthésiques midazolam-alfentanil versus propofol-alfentanil lors de la cure d’otospongiose

This study was performed to compare the incidence of bleeding associated with two anaesthetic techniques during otolaryngological microsurgery. Twenty-eight venous interpositions for otospongiosis have been carried out at random either under local anaesthesia combined with light sedation (midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 and alfentanil 0 micrograms.kg-1) or using general anaesthesia (propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1, then 9 mg.kg-1.hr-1 and alfentanil 30 micrograms.kg-1, then 15 micrograms.kg-1). The patients' lungs were mechanically ventilated. Every ten minutes, heart rate, arterial blood pressure and FETCO2 were observed. Bleeding was assessed on a four-point scale and evaluated according to its duration and the annoyance that it caused. General anaesthesia was clinically better tolerated. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were lower than with general anaesthesia. The end-expiratory CO2 was 4.7 +/- 0.2 per cent. Bleeding was less frequent, lasted less time, but when it occurred the surgical disturbance was identical in the two groups. General anaesthesia produced a less bloody operating field and local anaesthesia required the cooperation of the patient.     

Influence of induction technique on intubating conditions after rocuronium in adults: comparison with rapid-sequence induction using thiopentone and suxamethonium

We have assessed the effect of anaesthetic technique on intubating conditions after rocuronium 0.6 mg kg-1 in four groups (n = 25 each) of unpremedicated patients in whom anaesthesia was induced with either thiopentone 5 mg kg-1 or propofol 2.5 mg kg-1 alone, or supplemented with alfentanil 20 micrograms kg-1. Fifty control patients were anaesthetized with thiopentone followed by suxamethonium. Laryngoscopy was commenced at 45 s. Overall intubating conditions after rocuronium were similar to those after suxamethonium (good and excellent > or = 96%) only when alfentanil was part of the induction regimen. However, intubation time was similar in all five groups and averaged 55 (SD 3.2) s, and the tube could be passed through open vocal cords within 70 s. After rocuronium the response of the diaphragm to intubation was more pronounced in the two groups of patients not receiving alfentanil (P < 0.0001) and in patients anaesthetized using propofol with alfentanil (P < 0.01) than in the control group. Opioids (in doses equivalent to alfentanil 20 micrograms kg-1) constitute an integral part of an induction regimen containing rocuronium 0.6 mg kg-1, regardless of whether or not thiopentone or propofol is used, in order to achieve overall intubating conditions similar to those after suxamethonium.      

Alfentanil in daycase anaesthesia

The effect of the addition of a single dose of 7 μg.kg⁻¹ of alfentanil to a propofol/enflurane anaesthetic on the quality of anaesthesia and recovery was assessed. A total of 53 ASA grade 1 or 2 patients who underwent daycase dental surgery were allocated randomly to receive either alfentanil or saline. The study was blinded so that neither the anaesthetist nor the assessor was aware of which solution had been given. Patients in the alfentanil group took signficantly longer to recommence spontaneous ventilation (p = 0.035). Both techniques provided good quality of anaesthesia. Postoperative morbidity was common (45% of patients), but there was no difference between the groups. The rate of recovery was similar in the two groups and no patient required hospital admission after the final assessment at 3 h. Drowsiness was only mild to moderate in both groups at 24 h. A single dose of alfentanil can be administered safely as part of a daycase anaesthetic without increasing morbidity, although there appears to be little advantage in doing so.